EXCELLENCE EXPERTISE INNOVATION
Tuberculosis
Infection Prevention in Health
Care Settings
Jeffrey L. Levin, M.D., M.S.P.H.
November 18, 2015
Tuberculosis Intensive
November 17‐20, 2015
San Antonio, TX
• No conflict of interests
• No relevant financial relationships with any
commercial companies pertaining to this
educational activity
Jeffrey L. Levin, M.D., M.S.P.H. has the
following disclosures to make:
EXCELLENCE EXPERTISE INNOVATION
Tuberculosis
Infection Prevention in Health Care Settings
Jeffrey L. Levin, M.D., M.S.P.H.*
for Heartland National TB Center *Department of Occupational Health Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at TylerTuberculosis Intensive
•
No conflict of interests
•
No relevant financial relationships with any
commercial companies pertaining to this
educational activity
Jeffrey L. Levin, M.D., M.S.P.H.
has the
following disclosures to make:
To describe the components of an effective infection
prevention program including:
Administrative controls to reduce risk of exposure
Environmental controls to prevent spread and reduce
concentration of droplet nuclei
Personal respiratory protection in areas with
increased risk of exposure
Infection prevention in the operating room
Objectives
CDC: Tuberculosis Infection Control and Prevention in Health Care Settings last accessed on 06‐29‐2014 at http://www.cdc.gov/tb/topic/infectioncontrol/default.htm#infection. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for preventing the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Health‐Care Settings, 2005. MMWR Recommendations and Reports, December 30, 2005, Vol. 54, No. RR‐17; last accessed on 06‐29‐2014 at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr5417.pdf. NIOSH Workplace Safety & Health Topics: Tuberculosis web page last accessed on 06‐29‐2014 at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/tb/. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSH respiratory protection program in health care facilities. September 1999; DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 99‐143. OSHA: Tuberculosis web page last accessed on 06‐29‐2014 at https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/tuberculosis/index.html.References & Resource Materials
Early identification
Prompt airborne infection isolation
Effective treatment of persons with active
TB
Guidance:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for preventing the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Health‐Care Settings, 2005. MMWR Recommendations and Reports, December 30, 2005, Vol. 54, No. RR‐ 17; http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr5417.pdf.Fundamentals of TB Infection Prevention
The Unsuspected Patient
with TB disease!!
What is the most dangerous type
of TB to Health Care Workers?
Aerosol (airborne droplet nuclei) transmits infection 21‐23% of close contacts become infected Patient factors Disease in lung, airway, and/or larynx Coughing or cough inducing procedure Concentration of droplet nuclei (cavitary>non‐cavitary). Sputum smear – • Positive: transmission occurs • Negative, but culture positive: transmission less often Environmental factors Duration of contact Small enclosed space Poor ventilation or recirculation of room air Other factors Susceptibility of the host Poorly understood bacteria characteristics Infection rate drops rapidly with treatment initiation
Transmission of Tuberculosis
How long should
patients be isolated?
Patients are not considered infectious if they
meet the following criteria:
Adequate therapy for 2 or 3 weeks
Favorable clinical response
Sputum smear negative x 3 (consecutive, 8‐24
hours apart, at least one early morning)
Traditional
CDC Isolation Recommendations
Disconnect:
Recommendation vs. Reality
Amended
CDC Isolation Recommendations
Many patients released from strict
isolation after 2 – 3 weeks
(cough resolved, energy improved,
smear grade↓, pan-susceptible
Guiding principle: Minimize transmission risk
Inpatient
therapy guidelines:
Is it worth putting more people at risk?
Clinical indications (e.g., massive hemoptysis,
concurrent disease complications)
High risk for poor adherence to therapy
Outpatient or Inpatient Therapy?
In general, patients who have suspected or confirmed
TB disease should be considered infectious if they
have disease in the lungs, airway, or larynx, or
are coughing, or
are undergoing cough inducing procedures, or
have positive AFB sputum smears,
And
are not on anti‐tuberculosis chemotherapy, or
have just started chemotherapy, or
have a poor clinical or bacteriologic response to
chemotherapy.
Recognition of Infectiousness
Exposure in small, enclosed spaces
Inadequate local or general ventilation that results in
insufficient dilution or removal of infectious droplet
nuclei
Recirculation of air containing infectious droplet nuclei
Inadequate cleaning of equipment
Environmental Factors that
Enhance Probability of Transmission
Advisory
CDC 2005 Guidelines
NIOSH and respirators
Regulatory
Federal OSHA
State OSHA (where applicable)
State public health agency for reporting
Accreditation
The Joint Commission
Agency “Oversight” for HCWs
Applies to entire health care setting rather
than selected areas
Scope of settings broader: laboratories, more
outpatient & non‐traditional settings
Overview of Scope Difference
2005 versus 1994 CDC Guidelines
All patients with confirmed drug‐susceptible TB disease should
remain in AII while hospitalized until they:
have had three consecutive, negative AFB sputum smear results
collected in 8‐24 hour intervals (at least one should be an early
morning specimen as respiratory secretions pool overnight).
Will generally allow patients with negative smear results to be
released from airborne precautions in 2 days;
demonstrate clinical improvement; and
are on adequate anti‐TB chemotherapy.
Continued isolation for those with multi‐drug resistant TB
Airborne Infection Isolation (AII)
TB Infection Prevention Program and
Three‐Level Hierarchy of Controls
Administrative Controls
Primary strategy for
infection prevention
intended to reduce risk of
exposing uninfected
persons to persons who
have infectious TB
Assigning responsibility for TB infection prevention
Conducting a TB risk assessment
Developing and instituting a written TB infection
prevention plan
Ensuring the timely availability of lab
Implementing effective work practices and work
assignments
Ensuring proper cleaning/disinfection of equipment
Training and education of HCWs
Screening and evaluating HCWs
Applying epidemiologic principles
Coordinating efforts with state/local health departments
Administrative Controls
TB infection prevention programs for settings where
patients with suspected or confirmed infectious TB
disease might be encountered (whether or not kept
beyond initial assessment or care)
TB risk assessment (CDC 2005, Appendix B)
Community rate of TB disease Number of patients with TB disease presenting for care Timeliness of recognition, isolation, and evaluation Evidence for transmission of MTB in the setting Types and condition of environmental controls present in facility Annual risk assessmentAdministrative Controls
Baseline testing for M. tuberculosis infection Serial testing for M. tuberculosis infection Serial screening for signs or symptoms of TB disease ‐ exempt HCWs who have a documented history of a positive screening test result or adequate therapy for TB infection or disease, from further testing unless symptomatic TB training and education Two step TST versus blood analysis for MTB (BAMT/IGRA) strengths andTB Screening for HCWs
(CDC 2005 – Appendix C)
Risk Classification to Determine Need for HCW
TB Screening and Frequency*
*CDC Guidelines, 2005Environmental Controls
Environmental controls
(the second level of the
hierarchy) prevent the
spread and reduce the
concentration of infectious
droplet nuclei.
Environmental controls
include technologies for
the removal or inactivation
of M. tuberculosis.
Primary
Controlling the source of infection by use of local exhaust ventilation (hoods, tents, or booths) Diluting and removing contaminated air by use of general ventilation Secondary
Controlling the airflow to prevent contamination of air in areas adjacent to the source (Airborne Infection Isolation rooms or AII) Cleaning the air by use of high‐efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration CDC guidelines recommend the use of ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI) only with the simultaneous use of HEPA filters and high rates of purge airflowEnvironmental Controls
Two types of general ventilation system
Single pass (preferred) Recirculation (use of air‐cleaning technologies like HEPA filtration) Constant air volume preferred over variable air volume systems as negative pressure differential easier to maintain Negative pressure
Achieved by exhausting air at higher volumetric rates of 12 air changes per hour (ACH) in new facilities (> 6 ACH for AII in existing facilities) Move air from less to more contaminated Ceiling to floor one option to reduce HCW exposure Importance of monitoring and regular maintenance
Environmental Controls
General Ventilation‐Special Issues
High‐efficiency particulate air filtration
Minimum removal efficiency of 99.97% of particles >
or = to 0.3 microns in diameter
HEPA
CDC Guidelines, 2005Room Air Flow Pattern
Designed to Provide Mixing of Air
An ante room is always recommended, as this provides a
barrier between the TB Room and hallways and limits the
impact of opening doors and traffic. Helps to maintain
Negative Isolation.
Patient
Room Ante room HEPA Filter
From CDC Guidelines, 2005
Monitoring Room Air Flow
Continuous Monitor with Pressure Alarm
Normal OR Airflow: OR Hallway
Bacterial contamination of surgical field
But… Dissemination of TB from surgical field
Measures to prevent TB dissemination in OR
Administrative: Schedule patient with TB disease during
low‐use period (few other patients/staff, extended time
after case for air purification)
Environmental: OR w/ ante room; Ante room air flow
pressure negative to OR & hallway; >95% efficiency filter
on expiratory port vent/anesthesia machine
Respiratory Protection: Staff wear N95 mask
Special Situation:
Operating Room (OR)
Personal Respiratory Protection
The third level of the
hierarchy is the use of
personal respiratory
protection in situations
that pose a relatively high
risk for exposure.
Implementing a respiratory protection program
Training HCWs on respiratory protection
Training patients on respiratory hygiene and cough
etiquette procedures
Respiratory Protection Measures
1994 – CDC Guidelines 10/17/1997 – OSHA published a proposed standard for occupational exposure to MTB (29 CFR 1910.139) Respirator usage for TB regulated by OSHA under 29 CFR 1910.139 and compliance policy directive (CPL) 2.106 (Enforcement Procedures and Scheduling for Occupational Exposure to Tuberculosis) and CPL 2‐254A (Respiratory Protection Program Guidelines) 12/31/2003 – OSHA announced termination of rulemaking for a TB standard Respirator usage for TB now regulated under the general industry standard for respiratory protection (29 CFR 1910.134) Consolidated Appropriations Act for 2005 and 2006 – none of the funds appropriated to administer or enforce Respirator Standard to require annual fit testing beyond initial testing Restrictions removed in 2008 – see OSHA at http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=INTERPRETATIONS&p_idRespirators‐Sequence of Events
When Should Personal
Respiratory Protection be Used?
In other settings where administrative
and environmental controls are not
likely to protect them from inhaling
infectious airborne droplet nuclei
While conducting aerosol‐producing
procedures
Entering areas in which patients with suspected or
confirmed infectious TB disease are being isolated
Present during cough inducing or aerosol generating
procedures performed on patients with suspected or
confirmed infectious TB disease
Respirator Program Steps (NIOSH)
Conduct a TB risk assessment
Select respirators
Write Standard Operating Procedures
(SOPs)
Medically screen all users
Provide training
User seal check, fit‐test, and issue
respirators
Inspect, clean, maintain, and store
respirators
Evaluate the program
At least N‐95 particulate filter respirators certified by
the National Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health (NIOSH) should be used and is adequate in most
situations
Ability to adequately fit respirator wearers who are
included in a formal respiratory protection program
Ability to fit the different facial sizes and characteristics
of health care workers. This can usually be met by
making respirators available in different sizes
In selecting respirator models, give preference to
models shown by their manufacturers to have
inherently well fitting characteristics
Respirator Selection Criteria for MTB
OSHA’s
Respiratory Protection Standard
29 CFR 1910.134
Filtering Face Piece
A negative pressure particulate respirator with a
filter as an integral part of the face piece or with
the entire face piece composed of the filtering
medium. Meets the CDC/NIOSH criteria for N95.
Also includes other higher efficiency (99 and 100)
models and different (P and R) mask materials.
Nine classes: three levels of filter efficiency, each
with three categories of resistance to filter
efficiency degradation due to the presence of oil
aerosols
Classes of Non‐powered
Air‐Purifying Particulate Filters
N – 95, 99, 100 ; N for Not resistant to oil
R – 95, 99, 100 ; R for Resistant to oil
P – 95, 99, 100 ; P for oil Proof
An air‐purifying respirator that uses a blower to
force the ambient air through air‐purifying
elements to the inlet covering.
Powered Air‐Purifying Respirator
(PAPR)
Physician or Other Licensed Health
Care Professional (PLHCP)
An individual whose legally permitted scope of
practice (i.e., license, registration, or
certification) allows him/her to independently
provide, or be delegated the responsibility to
provide, some or all of the health care services
required by paragraph (e), Medical evaluation.
Must provide a medical evaluation to determine employee’s ability to use a respirator, before fit testing and use Must identify a PLHCP to perform medical evaluations using a medical questionnaire or an initial medical examination that obtains the same information Medical evaluation must obtain the information requested by the questionnaire in Sections 1 and 2, Part A of App. C of the OSHA Standard Follow‐up medical examination is required for an employee who gives a positive response to any question among questions 1 through 8 in Section 2, Part A of App. C or whose initial medical examination demonstrates the need for a follow‐up medical examination
Medical Evaluation: Procedures
Annual review of medical status is not required
At a minimum, employer must provide additional medical
evaluations if:
Employee reports medical signs or symptoms related to the ability to use a respirator PLHCP, supervisor, or program administrator informs the employer that an employee needs to be reevaluated Information from the respirator program, including observations made during fit testing and program evaluation, indicates a need Change occurs in workplace conditions that may substantially increase the physiological burden on an employeeMedical Evaluation
Additional Medical Evaluations
Fit Testing
Before an employee uses any respirator with a
negative or positive pressure tight-fitting face
piece, the employee must be fit tested with the same
make, model, style, and size of respirator that will be
used – annual testing and training.
Qualitative Fit Test (QLFT)
A pass/fail fit test to assess the adequacy of respirator fit
that relies on the individual’s response to the test agent.
Agents prescribed in Appendix A in OSHA Regulations – •Isoamyl Acetate •Saccharin Sodium•Denatonium Benzoate (Bitrex) •Stannic Chloride (Irritant smoke)