• No results found

Business Process Modeling Introduction

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Business Process Modeling Introduction"

Copied!
45
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Business Process Modeling

Introduction

Stefano Angrisano, Consulting IT Specialist December 2007

(2)

Streamline or optimize business processes:

a Top Business priority

Streamline or optimize business processes

Boost worker productivity across company Improve customer service Gain better return on IT capital investments

Keep up with change Organize and use customer data

Use IT to achieve compliance Retain skilled staff members Reduce the cost of IT operations

85% 85% 84% 82% 81% 80% 79% 78% 78% Business priorities Business priorities Business priorities

Streamline or optimize business processes

Boost worker productivity across company Improve customer service Gain better return on IT capital investments

Keep up with change Organize and use customer data

Use IT to achieve compliance Retain skilled staff members Reduce the cost of IT operations

85% 85% 84% 82% 81% 80% 79% 78% 78% 85% 85%

(3)

What are Business Processes ?

ƒ

Coordinated chains of activities producing business value and results

ƒ

Typically consist of:

– Human activities (Human Workflow)

– Business system activities (such as ERP, or CRM,…)

– Combinations of human and system activities

ƒ

Define how the business runs at an operational level

ƒ

May be hidden or embedded:

– In the organization and culture of a company

– In the business systems of a company

ƒ

Are often poorly understood

(4)

What is Process Modeling ?

ƒ

The capturing of an ordered sequence of business activities and supporting information

– Business processes describe how a business pursues its objectives

ƒ

There are different levels of process modeling:

– Process Maps – simple flow charts of the activities

– Process Descriptions – flow charts extended with additional information, but not enough to fully define actual performance

– Process Models – flow charts extended with enough information so that the process can be analyzed, simulated, and/or executed

(5)

What is Process Mapping / Modeling ?

ƒ Provides a graphical

representation of the flow of a business process.

ƒ Depicts a set of activities that represent the alternative routes that the flow of execution can take.

ƒ The primary purpose of process mapping is to document the process.

ƒ Process Mapping can be done with any graphical tool (WBM, MS Visio, MS Powerpoint, etc.)

ƒ Business Process Modeling refers to the addition of operational data into the flow of activities.

ƒ It includes data such as the

resources required to perform a task and their timetable to work, the task duration and associated direct and indirect costs.

ƒ The primary purpose of process modeling is to conduct objective analysis in order to understand the costs, bottlenecks and resources constraints of a process.

ƒ Process Modeling can only be performed in more advanced software such as WBM.

(6)

What is Process Modeling ?

ƒ

Business Process Modeling is the activity of representing both the

current ("as is") and future ("to be") processes of an enterprise, so that the current process may be analyzed and improved. BPM is typically performed by business analysts and managers who are seeking to improve process efficiency and quality. The process improvements

identified by BPM may or may not require IT involvement, although that is a common driver for the need to model a business process

ƒ

Modeling language standards that are used for BPM include Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN), Business Process Execution

Language (BPEL), Unified Modeling Language (UML), Object Process Methodology (OPM), and Web Services Choreography Description Language (WS-CDL). Other technologies related to business process modeling include model-driven architecture and service-oriented

(7)

What is BPMN?

ƒ

BPMN is flow-chart based notation for defining Business Processes

ƒ

BPMN is an agreement between multiple modeling tools vendors, who had their own notations, to use a single notation for the benefit of end-user understand and training

ƒ

BPMN provides a mechanism to generate an executable Business Process (BPEL) from the business level notation

– A Business Process developed by a business analyst can be directly applied to a BPM engine instead of going through human

interpretations and translations into other languages

Receive Credit Report Approval Approve? Include History of Transactions Yes No Include Standard Text

(8)

A BPM Hourglass

Audiences:

Strategy Consultants Business Analysts Process Designers System Architects Software Engineers

Purposes:

Modeling Execution

Business Environment

Technology Implementation

BPMN

BP

BPEL

Intersection Point Scope

(9)

Process Models Goals

The goals of a process model are:

ƒ To be Descriptive

– Track what actually happens during a process.

– Takes the point of view of an external observer who looks at the way a process has been performed and determines the improvements that have to be made to make it perform more effectively or efficiently.

ƒ Prescriptive

– Defines the desired processes and how they should/could/might be performed.

– Lays down rules, guidelines, and behavior patterns which, if followed, would lead to the desired process performance. They can range from strict

enforcement to flexible guidance.

ƒ Explanatory

– Provides explanations about the rationale of processes.

– Explore and evaluate the several possible courses of action based on rational arguments.

– Establish an explicit link between processes and the requirements that the model needs to fulfill

(10)

Why Modeling Processes ?

ƒ Modeling for compliance/documentation

– Document processes for use by a business to understand the business process

– Customers use output for training, collaboration, documentation requirements for compliance regulations (Sarbanes-Oxley and Basel II)

– Linkage to real-time monitoring provides a feedback mechanism for reporting requirements needed for compliance

ƒ Modeling for redesign

– Document both the current state and future state business process and the comparison to determine Return on Investment (ROI) analysis

– Six Sigma and Process Improvement are common methodologies

ƒ Modeling for execution

– Modeler can create artifacts from the business model and make them available in technology development tools to reduce the overall implementation time of new business processes.

(11)

Why is There a Need for Business Modeling and Analysis?

Gap Gap

-Business Domain

Technical Domain

Strategy Consultant LOB Manager

Business Analyst Corporate Developer Data Architect IT Architect Process Specialists Issues

Inconsistent in information collectionCommunication issues with subject matter experts

Incomplete requirements documentation

Lack of visibility into the enterpriseNo view of complex behaviors

Limited documentation of processes and procedures

Issues

Incomplete requirementsDifficult to understand the scope of the business issues and how to solve them

(12)

Why Modeling Processes ?

ƒ

Model to bring business and IT together

– Communicate fully with subject matter experts

– Provide visibility into the enterprise

– Create complete

documentation of processes and procedures

– Deliver complete requirements documentation to IT

– Allow IT to understand the scope of the business issues and how to solve

Business Domain Technical Domain LOB Manager Business Analyst Corporate Developer Data Architect IT Architect Process Specialists

(13)

Understanding business needs…

“Customers don’t want a quarter-inch drill

– they want a quarter-inch hole.”

Theodore Levitt, Harvard Business Review

IT View

LOB View

Without understanding the nature of

the hole it’s difficult to prescribe a

drill…(maybe they need a punch!)

(14)

Value of Process Modeling

Process Modeling enables:

ƒ

Understanding potential areas for increased value

ƒ

Assessing the impact of new solutions and quantifying the expected improvement and ROI

ƒ

Improved logic, robustness of quantification, and unambiguous process maps

ƒ

Improved compliance with regulatory requirements

ƒ

Improved communication through increased level of detail

ƒ

Understanding of current business measures or KPI

(15)

Process Model Requirements Business Goals As-Is (Current State) To-Be (Future State) Static and Dynamic

Analysis

Simulation

(16)

Business Goals / Requirements

ƒ

Modeling for redesign / process improvement requires alignment to Business Goals

– Reduce max. process duration by 10%

– Increase chance of most favorable path by 25%

ƒ

Business Goals should be prioritized, as they could impact several processes

ƒ

Define requirements to achieve Business Goals, but:

– Avoid ‘impossible’ requirements

– Align to business strategic initiatives

(17)

Prioritization and evaluation matrix

Target area Larger reengineering project Minimize projects in this area

Look for a customer initiative that has momentum and that

can be leveraged over time. Consider

reusable services.

Look for a customer initiative that has momentum and that

can be leveraged over time. Consider

reusable services. Services opportunity Lower effort Lower,

non-strategic value Higher strategic value, linked to key initiative Greater

effort

Payback Use simulation to assist

with the calculation of payback and positioning

(18)

Potential shortfalls in IT system capabilities can be identified

ƒ Gaps – opportunity to

implement new IT systems where none exist before ƒ Deficiencies - the system

lacks key functionality, or is poorly designed

ƒ

Duplication – multiple systems compete for the same need. Opportunity for consolidation

ƒ

Over-Extension – a system designed to

support one component is extended beyond its core capability to help support others Direct Execute Control Business Admi n is tra ti on Ma rk et in g Asset M g m t & Pr o d uct Developm ent Sales & Channel M a nagement Ne w Business Cust o m er Service Cont ra ct Fin a nce Business Admi n is tra ti on Ma rk et in g Asset M g m t & Pr o d uct Developm ent Sales & Channel M a nagement Ne w Business Cust o m er Service Cont ra ct Admi n is tra ti on Operations Planning Service Management Contract & Policy Set-up Channel Management Campaign Management Alliance Management Product Management Manufacturing Planning Distribution Planning Operational Control Financial Control Accounting &Finance Planning Asset & Liability Management Funds Management Trading General Ledger Treasury Claims processing Contact Servicing In-force Processing Check Processing Contract Administration Correspondence Intelligent Routing Contact Repository Customer Profile Fees & Commissions End -customer marketing Campaign Execution Product Development Sales Support Product Profile End -Consumer Sales Conservation Human Resource Business Planning Management Manual Regulatory Reporting Training Council Services Systems & Facilities Helpdesk Advisor/ Intermediary Administration Advisor/ Intermediary Set-up Wholesales gaps gaps gaps duplication over-extension deficiency

(19)

Modeling Steps

ƒ

Model the Current State

ƒ

Validate Model

ƒ

Analyze

– Static and Dynamic Analysis (requires Simulation)

– Reports

ƒ

Identify potential improvements

ƒ

Model the Future State(s)

ƒ

Simulate

(20)

Model the Current State

ƒ

Gather existing documentation (if any)

ƒ

Interview Process Owner

– Don’t just stop there: different people might have different views / scopes

ƒ

There are several dimension to be considered: hilight what you want to address

– Process / Task durations, Exception paths, reworks, unnecessary approval steps

– Resources vs. Roles

– Business Items / Information – do they undergo transformation along the path (i.e. Value added) ?

(21)

True Business Understanding Requires Multi-Dimensional Models

ƒ Process Model

– Click & Drop to create the graphical view - the visual representation of the process model.

ƒ Resource Model

– Define resource types, templates and instances – and associate them to the process

ƒ Information Model

– Define the data & its attributes – show how data is used within a business process.

ƒ Organization Model

– Define organization units, locations – show roles, resources and other organizational elements in structured diagrams

ƒ Analysis Model

– Define and anlayze process elements for their static relationships, as well as their simulated dynamic behavior

ƒ Business Measures Model

– Define Key Performance Indicators and Metrics that represent the critical performance characteristics to be Monitored

ƒ Collaboration & Team Support

– Publish models for browser based access and commentary & share models in a centralized repository

ƒ Output Capabilities - Integration

(22)

Process Model Validation

ƒ

Once models are “Completed”, they must be validated

– Review meetings – Reports – Simulation

ƒ

Validate models – Syntax – Standards – Semantics – Sense

(23)

Analyze Current State

ƒ

Static Analysis is the first step to better understanding how a process is defined with respect to time and cost.

– It’s the process of extracting targeted types of information in a model in its static form.

– Analyze relationships between processes and tasks and their

assignments to resources, allocations, schedules, costs and timing.

ƒ

Dynamic Analysis allows you to perform detailed analysis on the results of simulations to extract information regarding scheduling, costs, output, and other statistics pertaining to a process.

ƒ

Simulation and Dynamic Analysis allow you to discover behaviors that would be difficult to discover otherwise (bottlenecks, resource

constraints, wait time).

ƒ

Compare results of Dynamic Analysis with Real Life: if they match closely, chances are that your model is correct.

(24)

Identify Potential Areas for Improvement

ƒ

Once you have the issues isolated, you can begin to consider potential areas of improvement

– Consolidate / Eliminate Tasks

– Maximize the use of Parallel paths

– Increase probability of most desirable paths

– Reduce task durations

– Modify resource requirements

– Improve the use of data and information

(25)

Probing questions to ask and things to consider

ƒ Questions

– If the process breaks, where does it break, when and how often?

– Where is there waste in the process – time, materials?

– Is process documentation followed? How do you know?

– What do the customers want from the process (accuracy, speed, reliability, low risk, low cost)? What do they do when they don’t get it (penalties, risk, go

elsewhere)?

ƒ Consider where exceptions occur in the process

– If they are found near the end of the process it’s likely that quality is being inspected in.

– Probe to determine if problems originate earlier in the process

– Consider ways to go around – one of the easiest ways to improve a process: make a change earlier (e.g. data integration, automation) and avoid the

exception. Most transactions then flow around and impact is minimized.

ƒ Consider information and data

– Is it missing? Is it re-keyed or recreated?

– Does the process launch without needed information?

(26)

Where to look and what to do

(After simulation) look for ways to eliminate unused paths and to bypass or minimize high cost activities using rules, integration, etc.

High cost activities, infrequently executed paths

Document the process – sometimes simply documenting a process delivers benefit Inconsistent output/process results

Create parallel processes that allow different work to be processed at the same time

Sequential processes with built-in wait time; excessive customer wait time

Consider a common process based upon best practices, allowing for planned, local variation as needed

Process duplication across multiple divisions or work units

Use electronic forms and workflow to track the process and capture status information

Paper-driven processes with printed forms and tracking logs

Use simulation to reveal hidden costs and to show how a business case may be made

Automated processes that have not been changed for years (no business case for change)

Replace (management) approvals with rules-based workflow

Processes supported through multiple management approvals and reviews

What to do Where to look

(27)

What to look for in the current and future states

Current state process

ƒ Bottlenecks and constraints

ƒ Rework, errors and exceptions

ƒ Missing, incomplete information

ƒ Fragmented processes held

together through spreadsheets, re-keying, informal workarounds

ƒ Numerous approvals and audits

ƒ Sequential activities creating delays

ƒ Paper-based processes

ƒ Lack of measures, performance indicators (decisions based on feelings vs. facts)

ƒ Lack of documentation

ƒ Processes that are too slow, too costly to be competitive

Future state process

Improved process

ƒ Streamlined with automated workflow

ƒ Exception-based including alerts and escalation (out of bounds conditions and time triggered)

ƒ Improved access to accurate information through integration

ƒ Rules-driven approvals and routing

ƒ Use of managed parallel activities

ƒ Dashboard monitoring and decision-making based on real-time Key Performance Indicators, results

ƒ Improved ability to respond to and implement required regulatory controls

(28)

Companies that have implemented Business Process Monitoring systems are seeing results…

“Three-quarters of 160 companies surveyed recently believe they are flying their business processes ‘blind and without instruments.’ This lack of visibility, often due to old application software, is inhibiting all levels of management from seeing bottlenecks

in such critical processes as capital risk management, claims tracking, compliance, inventory management, and customer service.”

ƒ

An average 9% improvement in revenues

ƒ

A median 12% decrease in process-related expenses

ƒ

A 10% return on assets (ROA)

ƒ

An 18% return on investment (ROI)

ƒ

94% are moderately or very pleased with the overall improvement Business Process Monitoring has delivered

(29)

Five Steps to Continuous Process Improvement

Define and Align Objectives

Assess and Analyze

Model Current State and Gather Data Cycle of

Improvement Model Future State,

Evaluate Options

Implement and Manage

ƒ Define improvement objective (e.g. “Reduce process cycle time by…”) ƒ Link to core process and/or

key initiative

ƒ Model exception paths including required corrective action

ƒ Gather and load cost and time (duration) data

ƒ Classify activities (value add vs. rework) ƒ Develop a simulation test plan

ƒ Simulate “As-Is” process to identify bottlenecks and high cost areas ƒ Eliminate unnecessary steps,

simplify as much as possible

ƒ Look for opportunities to automate (think business services!)

ƒ Model alternatives and rank by payback (use a simple matrix) ƒ Gather feedback on the proposed ƒ Develop pilot and

implementation plans ƒ Create measures ƒ Assign technical attributes ƒ Implement, Monitor performance

(30)

Model the Future State

ƒ

The future state model is focused on achieving the business goals defined at the start of the workshop

ƒ

Modifications should reflect improvements to the issues isolated during analysis and simulation

ƒ

Implementing changes to an existing process model is an iterative process

– Analysis and Simulation should be conducted after each change to understand the relative impact

ƒ

Finally, when all the changes made to the current state model have been validated by the customer, it becomes the future state model

(31)

Perform Comparison Analysis

Here resource loading is evaluated through simulation and analysis comparing current

vs. unlimited vs. balanced

Here resource loading is evaluated through simulation and analysis comparing current

vs. unlimited vs. balanced allocation.

Dynamic Analysis

Dynamic analysis includes ability to

compare multiple current- and future-state alternatives (both automated and non-automated) from cost, time, throughput perspectives and by exception path and classifier.

Result

Allows high-value/lowest cost improvement targeting and prioritization.

Dynamic Analysis

Dynamic analysis includes ability to

compare multiple current- and future-state alternatives (both automated and non-automated) from cost, time, throughput perspectives and by exception path and classifier.

Result

Allows high-value/lowest cost improvement targeting and prioritization.

(32)

Process Improvement

ƒ

Improvement frameworks and tools overview

(33)

Improvement Frameworks – knowing where to focus

ƒ Lean – Frequently found in manufacturing. Emphasis is placed on removing waste from a process. Sources of waste are generally known.

ƒ Six Sigma – Emphasis is on removing variation (exceptions) from a process with measures-driven new process management and design and iterative

improvement. Sources of variation must be discovered.

ƒ Lean Sigma – Combines both with an emphasis on waste removal first and then on elimination of variation. Normally driven by the Six Sigma improvement

method (Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control).

ƒ Kaizen – Typically a rapid execution improvement project – 4 to 5 days – used when data and problems are known. Required resources (IT, Management, etc.) are placed on call. Often driven by employee suggestion or idea. Still follows an improvement process/cycle.

ƒ Balanced Scorecard – A measurement system that typically seeks to account for and balance four perspectives: financial, customer, business process and

learning and growth.

ƒ Additional Frameworks include Malcolm Baldrige Assessment Criteria, ISO 9000, Rummler-Brache, etc.

(34)

What’s the big deal about Six Sigma?

ƒ Six Sigma means less than 3.4 defects per million opportunities (DPMO)

ƒ This means performance/quality that meets customer specifications 99.99966% of the time

ƒ Isn’t 99.9% good enough?

ƒ During everyday life in the US 99.9% means:

– Unsafe drinking water once per week

– No electricity for nearly one hour per month

– 500 wrong surgical procedures per week

– 2 short or long landings at most airports each week

– 20,000 wrong drug prescriptions per year

– 2,000 lost articles of mail per hour

16 841K .5σ 31 690K 1σ 50 500K 1.5σ 69.20 308K 2σ 84.10 159K 2.5σ 93.30 66,800 3σ 99.40 6210 4σ 99.97 230 5σ 99.99966 3.4 6σ % Defect free DPMO σ From Target

Airline crashes?

Lost luggage?

(35)

Graphing Six Sigma – using the bell curve or normal distribution

This process is performing at a Four Sigma level and includes variation that

drives cost up and profit down

Process performance Target Customer Specification 99.9% 1σ 2σ 3σ 4σ 2σ 4σ 6σ Target

This process is performing above Six Sigma levels against current customer

specifications

Customer Specification

Yield

Cost of corrective action, SLA penalties, opportunity cost, customer satisfaction, lost profit,

Defects

No Defects (exceptions) Achieved by eliminating sources

(36)

Example of Six Sigma

30

An employee leaves home every day at 8, must be at work at 8:30. He can choose between two routes: a city route, with possible traffic jams, which takes on average 25 mins. – and a suburb route, with less traffic, that takes on average 28 mins.

Which one should he choose ?

City 25 Target 28 Suburb Defects

Focus on Sources of variation /

No Defects (exceptions) Driving Time Pro b ab ilit y

(37)

Control charts

ƒ

Used to monitor process performance and initiate corrective action in Control step

ƒ

WebSphere Monitor allows Upper and Lower Control Limits to be set…

Mean 2σ 3σ

2σ 3σ

upper warning limit

lower warning limit upper control limit

lower control limit

Common-cause variation Special-cause variation

Monitor opportunity!

(38)

“Muda”

Muda

(

無駄

) is a Japanese term for

anything that is wasteful and doesn't

add value…

(39)

Where Muda (waste) is found

ƒ Toyota defined seven categories or types of waste.

– Overproduction (making more than what is needed, or making it earlier than needed)

– Transportation (moving products farther than is minimally required)

– Waiting (products waiting on the next production step, or people waiting for work to do)

– Inventory (having more inventory than is minimally required)

– Motion (people moving or walking more than minimally required)

– Processing itself

– Defects (the effort involved in inspecting for and fixing defects)

Medical device manufacturer Fishbone diagram example

Consider as the basis for probing questions

Consider as the basis for probing questions

(40)

Combining Lean and Six Sigma

Process

Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4

Lean = Balanced flows 6σ = Reduced variation Excess inventory Process waits 1 2 3 When Modeling:

• Focus on wait time, transfer times

• Use Value Add Classifiers

When Modeling:

• Focus on wait time, transfer times

• Use Value Add Classifiers

When Modeling: • Focus on errors,

exceptions

• Use exceptions and error type Classifiers

When Modeling: • Focus on errors,

exceptions

• Use exceptions and error type Classifiers

Don’t forget measures, KPI for

(41)

ƒ

Proven method of organizing both thinking and analysis

ƒ

In widespread use – Siemens, Microsoft, NTT, FedEx, Ford, IBM, others since 1985…

ƒ

Enables step-by-step problem solving and speeds analysis activity

ƒ

Simple and quick-to-learn way of controlling “yes, but…” (negative) personalities

ƒ

The Hats may or may not be revealed to workshop participants

ƒ

Proven method of organizing both thinking and analysis

ƒ

In widespread use – Siemens, Microsoft, NTT, FedEx, Ford, IBM, others since 1985…

ƒ

Enables step-by-step problem solving and speeds analysis activity

ƒ

Simple and quick-to-learn way of controlling “yes, but…” (negative) personalities

ƒ

The Hats may or may not be revealed to workshop participants

(42)

Using the Six Thinking Hats

Just the facts The emotional view

The White Hat

• Neutral and objective • Focus on data, facts

• Use two-tiered approach – tier one are verified facts, tier two are

assumptions-driven “facts”

• May be used when determining activity time estimates (durations) and when exploring KPIs

Say and do:

• Just the facts: how long, how many, how often…?

The White Hat

• Neutral and objective • Focus on data, facts

• Use two-tiered approach – tier one are verified facts, tier two are

assumptions-driven “facts”

• May be used when determining activity time estimates (durations) and when exploring KPIs

Say and do:

• Just the facts: how long, how many, how often…?

The Red Hat

• Focus on emotions and feelings

• Discussion may range from fear and dislike through to opinions

• Linked to the 10-40-50 rule

• May be used when exploring ideas, improvement alternatives, reaching consensus

Say and do:

• “This is how I feel about…” or “How do you feel about…?” or “How will others feel about…?” The Red Hat

• Focus on emotions and feelings

• Discussion may range from fear and dislike through to opinions

• Linked to the 10-40-50 rule

• May be used when exploring ideas, improvement alternatives, reaching consensus

Say and do:

• “This is how I feel about…” or “How do you feel about…?” or “How will others feel about…?” • Limit rationalizations and justification discussion

Worked in pairs

(43)

Using the Six Thinking Hats

Just the facts The emotional view

Inhibitors, risks Enablers and benefits

The Black Hat

• Focus on risk, weaknesses • Considers past and future

• High value – allows “can’t be done” attitude to be channeled

• May be abused if the only form of thinking

• May be used when evaluating barriers to and risks associated with the

implementation of the improved process

Say and do:

• What are the barriers, where are the risks…?

The Black Hat

• Focus on risk, weaknesses • Considers past and future

• High value – allows “can’t be done” attitude to be channeled

• May be abused if the only form of thinking

• May be used when evaluating barriers to and risks associated with the

implementation of the improved process Say and do:

• What are the barriers, where are the risks…?

The Yellow Hat

• Positive and constructive

• Used to probe for value and benefit • May be used when exploring benefits

of improvement alternatives

Say and do:

• “Yes, and…” (vs. “Yes, but…”) or “What makes this alternative possible The Yellow Hat

• Positive and constructive

• Used to probe for value and benefit • May be used when exploring benefits

of improvement alternatives Say and do:

• “Yes, and…” (vs. “Yes, but…”) or “What makes this alternative possible (or likely)…?”

(44)

Using the Six Thinking Hats

Just the facts The emotional view

Inhibitors, risks Enablers and benefits

The Green Hat

• Focus on creative alternatives

• Used by the facilitator to pause the thinking process (when use of Black Hat thinking becomes excessive) to set a new direction

• May be used when suggesting alternatives (brainstorming)

Say and do:

• Think creatively or “Let’s think outside of the box

• Can use outlandish or wild alternatives to force participants into creative mode The Green Hat

• Focus on creative alternatives

• Used by the facilitator to pause the thinking process (when use of Black Hat thinking becomes excessive) to set a new direction

• May be used when suggesting alternatives (brainstorming) Say and do:

• Think creatively or “Let’s think outside of the box

• Can use outlandish or wild alternatives to force participants into creative mode

The Blue Hat

• Summary and control (often the hat of the facilitator – calls for the use of other hats)

• Used to organize and think step-by-step (think like a computer!)

• Helpful when determining next steps, organizing results

Say and do:

• Use for periodic process checks The Blue Hat

• Summary and control (often the hat of the facilitator – calls for the use of other hats)

• Used to organize and think step-by-step (think like a computer!)

• Helpful when determining next steps, organizing results

Say and do:

(45)

References

Related documents

Data-driven design and management of services demand interdis- ciplinary knowledge from the business domain, processes, data analytics, and mathematical op- timisation. While

Recovery behavior when the Control Network Outage is longer than the IPSI Socket Sanity Timeout, but less than 60 seconds.. What happens to

Prior to January 1994, in India was carried out under administrative leadlines which required the project proponents of major irrigation projects, water body valley project,

The survey tools were designed by the assessment team and reviewed by a stakeholder group represent- ing academics, practicing clinicians, and public health officials from

product for such automotive applications, use and specifications, and (b) whenever customer uses the product for automotive applications beyond NXP Semiconductors’ specifications

Lietuvos tyrėjų dėmesio susilaukė įvairios temos,  vienaip ar kitaip susijusios su archeologijos paveldo apsaugos  raida,  pavyzdžiui:  Lietuvos 

• FDA Draft Guidance on Medical Device Data Systems (MDDS), Medical Image Storage Devices, and Medical Image Communications Devices.. • FDASIA Health

The meeting was attended by Park Board members Ed Batten, Mary Cortina and Tony Vellucci; Park Director Kirk Kincannon, Deputy Director Sarah Baldwin; Planning & Development