SEISMIC INTERPRETATION
&
RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION
UNIVERSITAS GAJAH MADA
20 OCT 2012
GERANICKY DELISATRA
PHE ONWJ
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Presentation Outline
• Introduction
• Fundamental of Seismic
• Seismic Data Acquisition & Processing
• Seismic Interpretation
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Presentation Outline
• Introduction
• Fundamental of Seismic
• Seismic Data Acquisition & Processing
• Seismic Interpretation
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Introduction
• Seismic play an important role in every phase of oil &
gas industry
• Exploration phase usually 2D seismic data;
exploration play concept, prospect identification,
exploration well drilling, appraisal well drilling
• Development phase usually 3D seismic data;
reservoir characterization, geological modeling, infill well
drilling, field development
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Exploration
Source Rock ?
Structural Trap
Stratigraphic Trap
• Working with minimum data; wells, seismic, etc • Building exploration
concept
• Prospect identification • Prove petroleum system • If exploration well succeed,
drill appraisal well to estimate reserve accumulation Mass Transport Complex Basement high/ Thinned section
Figure 7: Idealized GDE
Highlighting Additional Features with Patterns
SLOPE MUDSTONES SHELF MUDSTONES BASIN FLOOR MUDSTONES Nonmarine Deep Water Sands
(Fans)
Deep Water Sands (Fans)
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Development
• Dealing with numbers of well data, 3D seismic, engineering data
• More detailed work; field scale to reservoir scale • Reservoir characterization; property prediction, fluid
identification
• Building geological model as an input for reservoir simulation
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
EOR
• Using 4D seismic data
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Presentation Outline
• Introduction
• Fundamental of Seismic
• Seismic Data Acquisition & Processing
• Seismic Interpretation
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Basic Seismic Concepts
S = R * W S = Seismic R = Reflection Coeff. W = Wavelet RC IA1 IA2
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Polarity & Phase
Normal Polarity Reverse Polarity Minimum Phase Zero-Phase RC + RC +
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Knowing Polarity & Phase
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Exercise
Shale ρ = 2.4 g/cc V = 3000 m/s Tight Limestone ρ = 2.7 g/cc V = 6000 m/s Shale ρ = 2.4 g/cc V = 3000 m/sRC = (IA2 – IA1)
(IA2+IA1)
IA = ρ x V Wet Sandstone ρ = 2.6 g/cc V = 4000 m/s RC1 RC2 RC3*
=
RC SGeranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Vertical Resolution
Remember:
λ = V x f
Where λ = wave length (m) V = velocity (m/s) f = frequency (Hz)Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Presentation Outline
• Introduction
• Fundamental of Seismic
• Seismic Data Acquisition & Processing
• Seismic Interpretation
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Seismic Data Acquisition
• Type of survey:
– Land
– Transition
– Marine
• Type of data:
– 2D
– 3D
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Presentation Outline
• Introduction
• Fundamental of Seismic
• Seismic Data Acquisition & Processing
• Seismic Interpretation
Seismic 2D/3D data
Subsurface Geological
Information
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Required Data for Seismic Interpretation
• Basemap
• Well Data
Basemap
• Basemap is useful to know your map
view location while interpreting seismic
section
• Basemap will give us information about
coordinates, well location, 2D seismic
lines, 3D seismic area, scale bar, etc.
Well Data
• Type of well data:
Digital data (LAS or ASCII
format)
Hardcopy (Final well report,
well completion, etc.)
• Well Data:
Logs:
Gamma
Ray,
SP,
Resistivity, Density, Porosity,
Sonic
Checkshot
• Well data will give us information
about geological condition, interest
zone, tested zone, top formation, etc.
CS KORINCI-1A y = 0.0003x2 + 0.6078x + 9.5 R2 = 0.9992 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 TIME (ms) D E P T H ( m )
General Steps in Seismic Interpretation
WELL-SEISMIC-TIE
FRAMEWORK MAPPING
- HORIZON PICKING - FAULT MAPPINGTIME-STRUCTURE
MAP
DEPTH-STRUCTURE
MAP
TIME-DEPTH
CONVERSION
Well-to-Seismic Tie
• A process of tying well data
with seismic data by
correlating synthetic
seismogram with seismic
data
• Matching between well
marker (formation top,
top/bottom reservoir, etc.)
with certain reflector event in
seismic data
• Decide which reflector event
will be picked as horizon
Top B2a
Top B2b
Top B3a
Horizon Picking
• This step is done after defining
which recletor event will be
picked as horizon
• Most of seismic interpretation
work is horizon picking
• Purpose : framework mapping,
amplitude mapping
What event to be picked? Well-to-seismic
tie will give you the answer
Horizon Picking
Amplitude Extraction
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Fault Interpretation
•
Fault interpretation must be
confirmed with regional geology
(strike/dip), tectonic regime
(extensional/compressional), etc.
•
Know your fault better; is it normal
fault? Thrust fault? Wrong fault
interpretation will lead into wrong
framework
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Time-Structure Map
• Picked horizon and fault will be grid to
generate structure map. Since horizon
value is in time domain, the structure map
is called time-structure map
• To have a real subsurface information,
time-structure map should be converted
into depth-structure map
Time-Depth Conversion
•
Required data to convert
time-structure map to depth-time-structure
map is velocity
•
Remember; D = V x t
•
Velocity data can be obtained
from:
– Checkshot – Stacking data – VSP
•
Depth-structure map is a product
of multiplying time-structure map
with velocity function. Velocity is
varied with depth and geological
condition
CS KORINCI-1A y = 0.0003x2 + 0.6078x + 9.5 R2 = 0.9992 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 TIME (ms) D E P T H ( m )Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Depth-Structure Map
Time-structure Map Depth-structure Map
• Depth-structure map represent subsurface structural condition
• Due to velocity variation, depth-structure map can be different with time-structure map
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Direct Hydrocarbon Indicator (DHI)
• A quick look for hydrocarbon indicator
• Common DHI:
– Bright spot
– Dim spot
– Polarity reversal
– Flat spot
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Some Technique to Guide Seismic Interpretation
• There are some technique to guide seismic interpretation
• Using seismic attributes (phase, frequency, amplitude)
• Good for quick interpretation
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Coherency
Coherence
Reflectivity (amplitude)
• Coherency attribute
detects discontinuity
in seismic reflector
• Good in detecting
fault or stratigraphic
features
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Instantaneous Phase
Reflectivity (Amplitude)
Instantaneous Phase
• Instantaneous Phase
attribute balance the
weak
and
strong
reflector
• Good
in
tracing
reflector continuity
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Instantaneous Frequency
Reflectivity (Amplitude)Instantaneous Frequency
• Instantaneous Frequency gives an information
regarding frequency at certain time
• Gas column will absorp frequency content,
therefore, frequency below gas column will be
decreased
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Some Problems & Pitfall
• False Bright Spot
• Pull-up effect
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
False Bright Spot
• Gas sand and coal have a low impedance contrast with overlying shale
• Both gas sand and coal will give strong negative amplitude
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Mis-tie
• Mis-tie is a time gap between
intersecting seismic lines due
to different vintage or different
processing parameter ataupun
parameter processing yang
berbeda
• Mis-tie only occur in 2D
seismic data
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Presentation Outline
• Introduction
• Fundamental of Seismic
• Seismic Data Acquisition & Processing
• Seismic Interpretation
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Reservoir Characterization Method
• Seismic reservoir characterization is necessary
to predict reservoir property (porosity, Sw, etc.)
and its fluid contents (oil, gas, water)
• More quantitative analysis
• Require Rock Physics
• Basically, there are 2 main methods:
– Seismic AI Inversion
– Amplitude Variation with Offset (AVO)
– Multi-attribute
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Basic Theory
Seismic
Acquisition
Earth * Wavelet = Seismic
Seismic / Wavelet = AI
Seismic
Inversion
AI Earth
Reservoir
Characterization
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Workflow
Wavelet
Estimation
Feasibilty
Study
Buidling
Initial Model
Invert
Seismic
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Workflow
Wavelet
Estimation
Feasibilty
Study
Buidling
Initial Model
Invert
Seismic
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Workflow
Wavelet
Estimation
Feasibilty
Study
Buidling
Initial Model
Invert
Seismic
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Workflow
Wavelet
Estimation
Feasibilty
Study
Buidling
Initial Model
Invert
Seismic
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
AVO
AVO stands for Amplitude Variations with Offset, or
Amplitude Versus Offset
The AVO technique uses the amplitude variations of
pre-stack seismic reflections to predict reservoir fluid effects
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Basic Concept
Velocity
NMO
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Basic Theory
56
Offset
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
AVO Classification
57
The Rutherford and Williams classification scheme as
modified by Ross and Kinman (1995).
Class 1 AI Sand > AI Shale Class 2 AI Sand ≈ AI Shale Class 3 AI Sand < AI Shale
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Background
•
Shallow biogenic gas in Lower Petani
Fm. → main exploration target
•
Appear as
‘bright spot’ on Post-stack
seismic section
•
Coal in Upper Petani Fm. also appear
as ‘bright spot’
•
Bright spot can be a DHI, but also a
pitfall as well
•
Several dry-holes by the same pitfall
Coal
Gas Sand
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ Decrease Impedance Decrease Impedance Top Gas Sand Top Coal
What Makes it Happen?
Decrease in Impedance cause a negative Reflective Coefficient, and therefore appear as strong negative amplitude in seismic section
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Relationship Between AI & AVO Class
•
Shallow biogenic gas
are above 1200 m
•
AI value of gas sands
< shale Low
impedance sand
•
The crossplot between
AI and depth suggest
that those shallow gas
is classified into class
3 gas sand
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
AVO Modeling of Gas Sand and Coal
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
AVO Classification
Gas Sand Coal Intercept (-) Gradient (-) AVO Class 3 Intercept (-) Gradient (+/-) AVO Class ???Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
AVO cross-plotting
involves plotting the intercept against the gradient and
identifying anomalies. The theory of cross-plotting was developed by
Castagna et al (TLE, 1997, Geophysics, 1998) and Verm and Hilterman
(TLE, 1995)
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
AVO Crossplot Analysis
•
Cross-plot between intercept
and gradient of pre-stack
data confirms the model
•
Gas sand anomaly is fall into
class 3 gas sand region,
while coal is tend to fall
between mud-rock line and
class 4 region
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Multi-attribute
Multi-attribute analysis is a method
which uses more than one seismic
attribute to predict reservoir
physical properties based on well
logs data (Russell et. al, 1997)
You don’t have to remember this!
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Comparison between Inversion and
Multi-atttribute
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Workflow
Log
Prediction
Feasibilty
Study
Generate
Pseudo-log
Volume
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Workflow
Log
Prediction
Feasibilty
Study
Generate
Pseudo-log
Volume
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Workflow
Log
Prediction
Feasibilty
Study
Generate
Pseudo-log
Volume
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Other Methods
• Other methods in seismic reservoir
characterization is a combination of
Inversion and AVO
• For example:
– Lamda Mu Rho (AVO inversion)
– Simultaneous inversion (AVO inversion)
– Elastic Impedance/Extended Elastic
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ
Image Rights
Images are courtesy of:
• BP
• PHE ONWJ
• Chevron
• Fugro-Jason
• PGS
• Elnusa
• EMP
Geranicky Delisatra, Geophysicist – PHE ONWJ