• No results found

Corcon Design

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Corcon Design"

Copied!
24
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

SIMPLE DESIGN CHART & SAMPLE CALCULATIONS

INDEX



DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS P2



SIMPLE DESIGN LOAD AND SPAN CHARTS FOR CORCON P3



SAMPLE CALCULATION P6

BEAM DESIGN P15

(2)

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

CORCON is a hybrid moltiribbed slab +beam system using the best properties of a slab coupled with all the advantages of the beam used to stiffen the slab in deflection.

CORCON is a flexible system that can be applied to any span and loading

configuration by the use of inserts which can be used to vary the depth of the CORCON

rib beams - from a nominal 50 m2 depression to 300 m2 deep for extra heavy loads and or long Spam over 8 to 9m. Also by reducing the (c to c) centre to centre spacing from 1200 m2 and continuity the spam can be increased to 26m using post-tensioning.

Small spans - say 3m- use CORCON with "FLAT" insert mould (see the Figure below):

If require structural primary beams could always use upstand beams subject to requirements. (see the Figure below):

(3)

SIMPLE DESIGN LOAD AND SPAN CHARTS FOR CORCON

Beams @ 1200 Centres Single Span

Allowable superimposed live load (KPa) C to C spans metres Beam Depth d mm Reqd bar size overla p Avg Conc . vol m3/ m2* Total depth mm 4.0 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 10.0 11.0 14.0 50 2Y12 0.12 184 3 75 2Y12 0.12 209 5 .5^ 100 2Y12 0.12 234 5 1.5 150 2Y12 0.12 284 5 2.5 1 200 2Y12 0.12 334 4 4 2 1^ 250 2Y16 0.13 384 5 5 3.5 2 0.3 3** 300 2Y16 0,14 414 5 5 4 2 1^ 5** 3** 2***

1.5 hour fire rating, stc 49, min cover 85mm, f62 mesh top & 1/250 deflection

* based on 20m2 room ^ roof loads

** post tensioned

*** continuous post tensioned built in primary beam Single Span

Allowable superimposed live load (KPa)

C to C spans metres Beam Depth d mm Reqd bar size overlap Avg Conc. vol m3/m2* Total depth mm 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 50 2Y12 0.10 164 5 5 3 1 1 100 2Y12 0.10 214 5 4.5 2.5 .05 150 2Y12 0.10 264 5 3.5 1.5 200 2Y12 0.11 314 4 2 1 250 2Y16 0.11 364 5 5 4 2 1.5 0.5 300 2Y16 0.12 414 5 5 5 3.5 2 1

0.5-hour fire rating, min cover 65mm, f62 mesh top & 1/250 deflection * based on 20m2 room

^ roof loads Continuous Span

(4)

Allowable superimposed live load (KPa) and deflection to span ratio.

C to C spans metres Beam Depth d mm Reqd bar size overlap Avg Conc. vol m3/m2* Total depth mm 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10. 0 10. 5 11. 0 50 2Y12 0.12* 184 2 1/2 70 75 2Y12 0.12* 209 2 1/2 75 100 2Y12 0.12* 234 2 1/3 00 150 2Y12 0.12* 284 2 1/2 75 200 2Y12 0.13* 334 2 1/2 75 250 2Y16 0.13* 384 2 1/3 50 2 1/3 00 300 2Y16 0.13* 434 2 1/3 50 2 1/3 00 2 1/2 50

1.5 hour fire rating, stc 49, min cover 85mm, f62 mesh & y16 @ 1200mm top

(5)

SELECTED SECTION PROPERTIES b = 110mm B = 155Mm D = 485mm d = 300mm Fck = 30N/mm2 Fy = 460N/mm2 Conc. Cover = 25mm Rib Spacing = 900mm

Cross sectional Area = 177954.57mm2

Moment of Inertia Ixx = 2468.22E6 mm4

Reinforcement at Mid-Span = 2 * T16 mm Dia.

Reinforcement at Supports = 3 T 12mm Dia.

Moment Capacity at Mid Span = 69.08KN-m

Section Capacity at Support = 81.03

Actual Deflection = 1.14mm

Shear Capacity = 0.86N/Sq.mm

Shear Reinforcement = Please check CORCON test Results.

Concrete Volume per Sq.m of Plan Area = 0.15Cub.m

Reinforcement per Sq.m of Plan Area = 0.26Kg

B

d D

(6)

SAMPLE CALCULATION

PROJECT

The Sukhothai Bangkok

JOB REF DECOIN PTY LTD ACN 008 625 590 ABN 30 008 625 590 CALCULATION BY Upul Perera CHECKED BY CALC SHEET PART OF STRUCTURE PRINTED BY Decoin Pty Ltd DATE 09/02/2003

(7)

MEMBER REF

LOAD CALCULATIONS

Loading (Guest Room Area)

(A) Rib Self weight = 3.36 kN/m2 Screed + Finishes = 1.177 kN/m2 Services = 0.225 kN/m2 Ceilings = 0.225 kN/m2 Partitions = 421 . 8 434 . 3 kN/m2 - DL Imposed Lead 1.962 kN/m2 - LL n= 14.93 kN/m2 (ult)

Udl for Ribs DL = 8.421 x 1.2 = 10.1 kN/m

LL = 1.962 x 1.2 = 2.4 kN/m

(B) Plant Room Area

Rib Self wt. = 3.36 Screed = 1.1772 Services = 7622 . 4 225 . 0 kN/m2 - DL Live Leads = 7.35 8 kN/m2 - LL N= 18.439 kN/m2 (ULT)

Udl for Ribs DL = 5.715 kN/m LL = 8.829 kN/m (C ) Storage Room, Rib self wt. = 3.36 kN/m2 Screed = 1.177 Services = 7622 . 4 225 . 0 - kN/m2 - DL Imposed Load 4.905 - kN/m2 - LL OUT PUT R e f e r e n c e s t o B S 8 1 1 0

(8)

UDL  for Ribs, DL = 5.715 kN/m LL = 5.886 kN/m MEMBER

REF

Specimen Calculation

Loading for [live load of 300 kg/m2 Area]

Ribbed slab self wt = 0.14 x 24 = 3.36 kN/m2 Screed = 1.18 Services = 0.225 Ceilings = 0.225 4.99 kN/m2 – DL Live Load = 2.943 kN/m2 - LL

Design Ultimate Load n = 4.99 x 1.4 + 2.943 x 1.6

= 11.69 kN/m2

Uniformly Distributed Load on a Rib

DL = 1.2 x 4.99 = 5.88 kN/m

LL = 1.2 x 2.943 = 3.53 kN/m (service load)

Three load combinations were considered. Please refer Prokon print out sheets #01 to #03.

The rib beam is designed for max. sagging and hogging moment for each span, considering BM and SF envelopes.

OUT PUT MEMBER REF BS8110 Cl 3.3.4 CALCULATIONS

A. Durability and Fire Resistance of Rib Slab

Exposure conditions: It is assumed that these rib beams are used in areas where the concrete surfaces are protected

OUT PUT R e f e r e n c e s t o B S 8 1 1 0 Y20 Y20 Area=140561 mm2 = 0.14 m2 66 125 400

(9)

BS8110 Table 3.4 BS 8110 Table 3.5 BS 8110 Fig. 3.2

against weather or aggressive conditions.

Therefore treat as mild Exposure Conditions.

For Grade 30 Concrete (30 Mpa) the Nominal cover requirement is as 25 mm, for Durability requirement,

Note: Above cover requirement is including links

Nominal cover for Ribbed slab for : -

01 hr. Fire Period = 20 mm

02 hr. Fire Period = 35 mm for continuous beams 45 mm for Simply Supported beams

use 35 mm cover for bottom bars

Minimum member Dimensions regeared for Ribbed beams, is 125 mm and Slab thickness of 95 mm for 1 hr fire rating?

Same for 2-hr fire rating is 125 mm ribs & 125 mm slab thickness. MEMBER REF BS 8110 Cl.3.4.4.4 CALCULATIONS

Design for bending.

MaxM + re moment in the span = 71.1 kNm.

Effective Depth (d) = 400 – (35+6+15) = 344 mm

(10)

BS 8110 Table 3.27 K=  cu f bd M 2 30 344 1179 10 1 . 71 2 6   =0.017 < k’ = 0.156

Hence Compression R/F is not required.

Z=d [0.5 +        9 . 0 25 . 0 k ] < 0.95d =344 x [0.5+        9 . 0 017 . 0 25 . 0 ] =344 x 0.98 >0.95d  Z=0.95d=0.95x344=327mm

Depth to Neutral axis ‘x’ = (d-z)/0.45 =(344-327)/0.45

=37.8mm <100mm min. flange thickness

Hence, Neutral airs is within flange thickness.

area of tension R/F, As =  fyz M 87 . 0 2 6 555 327 450 87 . 0 10 1 . 71 mm    

 

h b As w min 100 =0.18 for 0.08 0.4 1179 5 . 95    b bw  (As)min = 2 2 555 7 . 68 100 400 5 . 95 18 . 0 mm mm    

Minimum Steel requirement is satisfactory.

As =555 mm2

MEMBER REF

CALCULATIONS

Maxm Support (at 1st intention Support) = -63 kNm

Effective depth to tension R/F; d=400-(25+6+25+20/2)=334mm

Effective depth to compression R/F; d’=35+6+15= 56mm

(11)

BS 8110 Table 327 M/bd2 fcu = 30 334 66 10 63 2 6    = 0.285 > k’=0.156

Compression Steel is required.

Z=d [0.5 +        9 . 0 ' 25 . 0 k ] = 334[0.5 +        9 . 0 156 . 0 25 . 0 ] = 334 x 0.776 = 259 mm x= (d-z)/0.45 = (384-259) / 0.45 = 166.6 mm

Area of compression Reinforcements:

A's=(k-k') fcubd 2 /0.87 fy(d-d') =

334 56

450 87 . 0 334 66 30 156 . 0 285 . 0 2       =261.8 mm2

Area of tension R/F : As = k' fcu bd2 / 0.87fyz +A's

As = 259 450 87 . 0 334 66 30 156 . 0 2      +261.8 = 601.6 mm2 minimum tension R/F h b As w . min 100 =0.26 Asmin. = 100 400 5 . 95 26 . 0   = 99.3 mm2 <601.6 mm2 minimum steel requirement is satisfactory.

Compression steel area at support A's = 261.8 mm2

Tension steel area at support As = 601.6mm2

(12)

MEMBER REF BS 8110 Table 3.9 Or from equation: BS 8110 Table 3.8 BS 8110 cl.3.4.56 Table 3.8 CALCULATIONS

Check for Shear

Maxm. shear force at 1st interior support = 60.6 kN, Take Maxm shear force at ‘d’ away from face of the support:

V=54.8 kN

Tension Steel provided 2 Y 20 (628 mm2 )

bd As 100 = 334 5 . 95 628 100   =1.968 v = 334 5 . 95 10 8 . 54 3   =1.718 N/ mm2

Design concrete shear stress vc

vc = 0.79 3 1 100       bvd As 4 1 400       d /γm  3 1 25     fcu = 0.79 3 1 628 100        bvd 4 1 25 . 1 334 / 400        3 1 25 30       vc = 0.79  1.250        25 . 1 046 . 1  1.0625 = 0.878 N/ mm2 Asv  bv sv (v-vc) / 0.87 fyv sv 

c

v sv yv v v b A f  87 . 0 

1.718 0.898

5 . 95 2 3 . 28 250 87 . 0      sv  153mm  provide R6-150 c/c

max shear link spacing 0.75d= 0.75 x 334 = 250 mm

minimum link requirement Asv  0.4 bv sv / 0.87 fyv

sv  v sv yv b A f 4 . 0 87 . 0 

5 . 95 4 . 0 2 3 . 28 250 87 . 0     = 322 mm OUT PUT

Provide Shear links at 1st interior support

(13)

provide nominal links @ R6 -225 c/c

Provide Nominal links R6-225 mm c/c. MEMBER REF Ref. BS 8110 Table 3.10 CALCULATIONS

Check for Deflection, (250mm Rib -n = 11.69kN/m2

      b bw =       1179 5 . 95 = 0.081

basic span/Depth ratio = 16.76 (Value between simply supported & continuous)

fs= b sprov req s y A A f 1 8 5 . .    = 1 629 538 450 8 5 = 240 N/ mm2 M/bd2 = 2 6 344 1179 10 1 . 71   = 0.509 Modification factor = 0.55 +

2.0 9 . 0 120 477 2          bd M fs M.F. = 0.55 +

0.9 0.509

1.95 2.0 120 240 477     Allowable span = 16.76 x 1.95 x 344 mm =11,242 mm > actual span 7,258 mm

Hence: Deflection is satisfactory.

(14)

CHECK FOR DEFLECTION (BS8110)

DATA

Bending moment at mid span = 114 kNm (Ultimate) Average web width (bw) = 95.5 mm

Effective Flange width (b) = 1179 mm Effective depth at mid span (d) = 394 mm Actual span of rib = 7525 mm

Strength of reinforcement (fy) = 450 N/mm 2

Area of steel required (Asreq.) = 778 mm2

Area of steel provided (Aspro.) = 805 mm 2

Moment redisribution ratio = 1

CALCULATIONS

Basic Span/Span Depth ratio = 16.76

The design service stress (fs) = 271.82 N/mm2

Modification factor = 1.67 1.673

Allowable Span = 11,046 mm Deflection is Satisfactory

Table 3.10 of BS8110

See the BS 8110- Table 3.10 Support Conditions

Rectangular Sections

Flanged Beams with bw/b

<=0.3

Cantilever 7 5.6

bw/b = 0.1 Simply Supported 20 16

Continuous 26 20.8

Note: Linear Interpolation between values given above can be used.

(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)

References

Related documents

Laser micro-dissection followed by real-time PCR revealed lower levels of Sirt1 mRNA expression in PECs and PT cells of WT+STZ mice than in those of WT+Sal mice (Fig.. Claudin-1

Table 6 shows the differences between perceived and measured accessibility by different age groups and travel modes at Greenwood Station with perceived

Results: The fathers experienced many difficulties in terms of day- to-day care: emotional burden, trying to balance work with caring for their child, administering

nia have been observed to affect high-level and some low-level integration mechanisms, suggesting that people with schizophrenia may experience anomalies across dif- ferent stages

(ii) Submitted electronically to the Commission and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, all Interactive Data Files required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of

Understanding how population, age structure, and income per capita differentially affect the energy inten- sity of output and carbon intensity of energy is an important step

Actuellement, Patrick Sheridan est professeur associe (tuba) du Royal Northern College of Music de Manchester (Angleterre), de la Royal Scottish Academy of Music and Drama

4.  In  the  event  that  the  Owner  has  not  fulfilled  all  of  the  obligations  set  out  in