The
1993 IllinoisHousing Needs
Survey:An
Analysis ofIllinois'
Housing Concerns and
Resources
from
the Perspective ofHousing
Pro-viders by
Mark
McCann
The
IllinoisHousingDevelopmentAuthority(IHDA)
commissionedthe1993IllinoisHousingNeeds
Surveytodetermine
how
IHDA
canbetterservetheneedsofstate residents.
The
surveywas
sent to over 700community
developmentcorporations,publichousingauthorities,municipalgovernments,non-profitclient
serviceorganizations,andregional
planningcommis-sions.
Two
hundred responses from throughout thestate revealed the housing needs ofthe residents of
Illinois" diverseregions.Pressing concernswere
evi-dent in the City of Chicago, the Chicago suburbs,
downstatecities(Rockford,Springfield,
Champaign,
Bloomington), and rural areas.The
consensusabout housing needs within regionsandthe diversityof needsfrom region to region were noteworthy. This paper analyzestheresultsofthesurvey,incorporatescensus
results,anddrawsconclusionsabout
how
IHDA
canimprovehousing conditionsinIllinois.
Sports
FacilityDevelopment:
The
Urban
Planner's Perspective by Chris Steele
The
1990'shavewitnessedawave
ofsports facili-ties construction unheard ofsince the first steel andconcrete, or "fireproof, baseball parks were
con-structedinthe 1910s.
The
largemajorityofthesenew
facilitiesarepublicly
owned
andoperated,duelargely toteam owners" implicit or explicit threats tomove
Ifyouwuuldliketoobtaina copy ofany ofthelistedMastersProjects, please contact Patricia Coke,
DCRP
Student ServicesManager,at(919) 962-3983. Thecostofthecopy is $0.10perpageplus shippingandhandling charges.cherishedsports franchisesfromtheir
home
towns.It is these threats, real or otherwise, that give sportsteams great negotiating
power
and leveragewhen
facilities, lease arrangements, and revenue streams
are discussed.
The
resultisthatcities, ormore
accu-rately politicians,areonly toohappytobuildfacilitiesto
savetheirteams,and hencetheir city's"image.""
The
same
can besaidofcitiesattemptingtowoo
existing franchisesto relocatetotheir area.Problemsarise
when
townsrealize,usuallytoolate, thatmany
ofthese facilitieshave been poorlysited,poorly designed,and lose
money.
Fiscal policy andurban designanalysis are familiar tools for theurban
planner.This paper exploresthe
ways
plannerscan be includedto improve the sportsfacility developmentprocess.
An
Evaluation ofTransportationand
Land
Use
Measures
to ProtectUrban
Air Quality byAndy
Bollman
This paper focuses on the use of transportation controlmeasures
(TCMs)
toreduceairpollutionintheU.S.
TCMs
havetheability to reducemobilesource emissions by eliminating or reducing vehicle trips,vehicle milestraveled,and/or congestion.
TCMs
are policiesandprogramsthatattempttoeitherreducethedemand
forinefficienttransportation alternatives(es-peciallythe single-occupantvehicle) or increase the
capacityand efficiencyofthecurrent transportation
network(e.g..throughtrafficsignalsynchronization).
An
overviewoftheimplementation historyofTCMs
follows,includinga descriptionofthecurrent legisla-tive and political frameworks
upon
which plannersmust build. For example, the 1990 Clean Air Act
Amendments
andtheIntermodal Surfacenew
planningenvironmentforTCMs,
which
includesmandatesfor
TCMs
inareaswiththemost
severeairqualityproblems andincreasedfederalfunding forthe
implementationof
TCM
programs.Thisbackgroundisfollowedbya detailed descrip-tionandevaluationof
TCMs
that are availableto local,regional, andstateplannerstomitigate the effectsof
transportation activity on air quality'.
The
paper de-scribes the evidence that has been developed onTCMs
basedon implementationexperienceandmod-elingstudies.For each
TCM,
estimatesareprovidedofthe potentiallevelofreductionsinvehicletrips,vehicle
milestraveled,and mobilesourcehydrocarbon
emis-sions.
Next
isadescriptionofTCM
designandimple-mentation issues,includingtheproperstructuringof
the
TCM
planningprocess, the interactive relationshipbetween individual
TCMs,
and estimates ofcost-effectiveness for each
TCM.
The
paper concludes withaprojectionoftheoutlookforTCMs
overthenexttwo
decades, and prescriptions for short-term andlong-term
TCM
programs forthe Research Triangleregion.Theseprescriptions arebasedonthe transpor-tationandlandusecharacteristicsoftheregionandthe
lessons learned from
TCM
implementation in other areas ofthe country.The
Triangle
Land
Conservancy's Richland
Creek
Corridor
Preservation Project:Corridor
Management
Plan byDave
FeinsteinThis
document
isthefirstpartofatwo-partplanningproject ofthe Triangle
Land
Conservancy (TLC), a local land trust operating in the Raleigh-Durham-ChapelHill,NorthCarolinaregion. In 1993,TLC
setout to prepare a long-term preservation plan and
acquisition strategy for the landalongRichlandCreek
inrapidly-developing northwest Raleigh.Located
be-tween
two
largetractsof open space,Umstead
StatePark and
NC
State University's Schenck Forest,RichlandCreekflowsthroughoneofthelast
substan-tially undevelopedstream corridorsin Raleigh.
As
aresult,thecreekconnectsthese
two
separate areasof permanent open space into a single, highly-viablehabitatunit.
The
corridoralongthecreekencompassesa mixture ofprivate and public trust lands, and the
scenic beautyofthenearby natural areashave
made
thesepropertieshighlyvaluableforresidentialdevel-opment.While
some
developmentoftheareaislikely,much
ofthecreekmay
bedegradedorclosedtopublicaccess in the process.
To
help ensureasoundfutureforthe corridor,thisdocument
has been created for the TriangleLand
Conservancy (TLC).Itservesasan information
data-baseandstatementof
TLC
spreferred planofactiontoguidetheorganization'seffortjinpreservinglandin
the corridor.
The
plan describesthe naturalandhistoricfeaturesofthe corridor.Italsoprovidestract-by-tract
management
guidelinesforpreservingand enhancingthe corridor's ecosystem. Because all private land withinthecorridorcannotbe acquiredforpreservation
by
TLC,
theplanemphasizesthe identificationofthe bestopportunities tomaximize
corridor conservation.It also suggests the
methods by which
thismay
be accomplished.The
informationprovidedby
thedatabaseandplanisexpected toformthe basis for thesecond phase of
the project—an expansionoftheplanning processto
involve landowners, governing agencies, and other
stakeholders.
Through
this project,TLC
hopes to createapermanentlyviableopenspace corridor con-necting Schenck Forest andUmstead
Park.Applying
Neo-Traditional Principles toLarge-Area
Planning:A
Framework
forBuildingaCom-munity
Development
Planand Guidance System
by Toby
MiUinau
Many
suburbancommunitiesarebeginningtorec-ognizethatconventionalapproachestoplanningand development
management
are resultingin unsatisfac-tory environments for their residents. Oft-citedex-amples of suburban ills include loss of
community
character, lackof
community
identity,inadequateandinaccessible parks, suburbansprawl,and pooraccess
tourban services.
The
principlesespoused byneo-traditionalplanning advocates holdprom
iseforcorrecting theseproblems. Theiremphasis on compact,pedestrian-friendlydevel-opment
directly addressesmany
ofthe growthprob-lemsafflictingsuburbia.
To
date,however,most
neo-traditionalendeavorshave beenconfinedtoindividual projectson isolatedsites.
While
thesedevelopmentsarewell-intentionedintheirgoalstoimprove
quality-of-life.theyarelargelyineffectiveiftheover-arching
landuse policies,andthe resultingadjacent
develop-ment
are incompatible with the principles ofneo-traditionaldevelopment.
The
benefitsof neo-traditionalismcanonly bereal-ized through a comprehensive re-orientation ofthe
community'splanninganddevelopment
management
systems. This
document
is intended as a guide forcommunities wishing to incorporate neo-traditional principles in the land use, transportation, and urban design
components
oftheircomprehensive plan.To
thisend,itisdividedintothreeparts:l)Establishingthenexus betweenneo-traditionalprinciplesandsuburban
development
management
techniques available toimplementneo-traditional principles,and3)
Establish-ing a
framework
through whichneo-traditionalplansand guidance systemscan bebuilt.
A
Coordinated Housing
Development
forOr-ange County's
Low
Income
Population:Prelimi-nary
Feasibilityand
Recommendations
by PeteFarquhar
Orange
Community
Housing
Corporation(OCHC)
receivedagrantin 1993tocoordinatethe effortsofall
organizations providinghousingfor
Orange
County's lowincome
population.The
resulthasbeenanagree-ment
todevelopseveral neighboringprojectson onefifteenacre sitenorth of
downtown
Chapel Hill.The
site will include a shelter for homeless families, a shelter for battered
women,
apartments for the low incomeelderly,andapartmentsforlow-incomefami-lies.
Despite potential conflicts between elderly
resi-dents and the younger low-income population, the projectisanexcellent
way
tomeet
avarietyofOrange
County's housing needs. Locating the projects asneighbors presents several opportunities for shared
services, including shuttleservice, clinic space,and permanent housing placementservices.
The
sitewillbordertheplanned Southern
Orange
Services Center,which willprovide servicesneeded byeach groupof
residents.Additionally,thecoordinateddevelopment
effortwi1 1
min
imizeconflictover funding sourcesandsites.
This paper firstexaminesthe planningand social
science literature that relates to each of the
sub-projects.Next,the potentialshapeof each sub-project
isdescribed,basedoninterviewswitheach sponsoring agency.
An
assessmentoftheneedforeach projectisalso included, based on statistics provided by local
agenciesandcensusdata.
The most
strikingportionofthis section describes the alarming growth in the
number
offamilieswithchildrenusingChapelHill'sCommunity
House
homeless shelter. Finally, the capital and operating budgets for each project are estimated,andpotentialfunding sourcesaresurveyed.An
Evaluation ofClusterZoning
in Practiceby Angela Gayle
Shape
StiefboldClusterdevelopmentisanalternativetotraditional subdivision,andisusedtoprovide
common
recreationareas,conserve environmentallysensitiveareas,
main-tain open space, and preserve rural character and
farmland. Proponents have provided
many
site-spe-cificexamples ofthe benefitsofclusterdevelopment.
but therehasbeen1ittleevaluationoftheimpactcluster
zoning hashadondevelopmentpatternsinjurisdictions
where
ithas been adopted.This study evaluatestheuseofruralclusterzoning
in
Montgomery
County,Marylandandresidential clus-terzoninginChapelHill,NorthCarolina.Both jurisdic-tionsallowcluster asanoptionalmethodofsubdivision.However, in
Montgomery
County
the intent is topreserve agriculture and open space.
Between
1981and 1991,85 percentofthesubdivisionapplicationsin
Montgomery
County'sPatuxent PlanningArea
werefor cluster projects; in Chapel Hill, 30 percent of
preliminary subdivision applications in the last ten
years have been clustered.
The
contrast in theper-centages is relatedto differences in the ordinances' requirements regardingopenspace dedicationandlot
dimensionreductionsandtheirresultantbenefitsand
coststodevelopers.
Evaluationofclustersubdivisionsinthese
twojuris-dictions revealsthatalthough significant
amounts
of open space have been preserved, there areweak-nessesinthe detailsoftheordinancesthatarelimiting theirsuccesses.
Very
fewagriculturalusesremainonthe reserved areas of
Montgomery
County's ruralcluster subdivisions'; insteadtheyhave
become
largelots for old farmhouse residences.
The
majorweak-ness ofthe Chapel Hill ordinance is that itdoes not
require a
minimum
amount
ofopenspace.This allows developers to benefitfrom reduced setbackrequire-ments whilededicating primarilysteepslopeand flood-plain areas as open space.
An
Analysisof StrategicPlanning
inNorth
Caro-lina
Communities
by StaceyHodges
This research, sponsored by the North Carolina Rural
Economic Development
Center,seekstodeter-mine
the shape that strategic planning has taken inNorthCarolinacounties.
The
purpose ofthestudyistodiscoverthecommonalities,pointsofdiversity,results,
andlessonslearnedbyplanners.
The
following sources ofinformationwereanalyzed:countyand multi-county region strategic plans; responses to questionnairessent toasampleofstrategic planners;and telephone interviewswithstrategicplanners.Forty countiesand one region have completed the strategic planning
process;fifteencountiesandfourmulti-county regions
arein theprocessofcompletingthe process.
The
plansandtheprocessesfromwhichthey derive varywidely from countytocounty.Some
oftheplansare very achievable;
some
are visionary;some
areoverly expansive.
Some
plansareorganizedandvisu-ally friendly or use powerful and earthy language;
un-friendlyformat.
Results varied as greatly as did the plans.
Geo-graphicregion,size,andrural/urbancharacterdonot
accountforthe variances.Despitethe diversity,
many
plannersshared
common
"lessonslearned."The
mostimportantelementofasuccessfulplan
was
foundtobethe inclusionof broad-basedparticipation.Citizen par-ticipation led to better decisions. Other important considerations that affected the success ofa given planincluded: theleveloffunding,careful
implemen-tation
management,
prioritysetting,andthe selectionof
manageable
issues.The
researchrevealedmany
stumbling blockstothe strategic planningprocess.However,
strategicplan-ning canprovetobe aneffectivepublicplanningtool
withexciting potentialiftheproperinput,commitment, andconsiderationsareallowed.
Preservation
and Development:
A
Development
Management
Plan forOld
Havana
byManuel
T.Ochoa, Jr.
The
falloftheSovietUnion
andtheEastern blochas created political andeconomic
difficukies forCuba
since 1989.
The
lossofsubsidieshasresultedinsevererationing,frequentblackouts,andcontinued deteriora-tionofinfrastructure.Meanwhile, American,foreign,
and
Cuban-
American
businessesarecloselymonitor-ing the situation and are considering strategies for
development and reinvestment on the island. Rapid redevelopmentcouldendangerthe historic fabricand
character ofOld
Havana
which isdeemed
of"out-standinguniversalvalue"bythe
World
Heritage Com-mittee ofUNESCO.
This paper describes the urban history and the
planningandpreservationhistoryofOld
Havana
andthenproposesadevelopment
management
systemfor the area.The
goal ofthe developmentmanagement
systemisto provideacomprehensive andconsistentframework
thataccommodates
tourism andcom-merce, while maintaining the character of
Old
Ha-vana.
The
developmentmanagement
systemisbasedonHavana'splanningtraditionsthatbalance preserva-tionand development.
The main
featuresofthedevel-opment
management
systeminclude:• an institutionalplanthatcoordinates various
plan-ning and
government
institutions and encouragesconsistentand comprehensiveplanning;
• a
new
generalplanandcapitalimprovementsplantoguide planning,preservation,and development; and
• aproposedplanofactiontoimplementthegeneral
planandcapitalimprovementsplanthrough
regula-tions,propertyacquisition,anda financial strategy.
The
Transportation Effects of Neo-TraditionalDevelopment
by MichaelBerman
Neo-traditionaldevelopment emphasizesa returnto
the gridpatternsand walkablestreetsofthe early part
ofthiscenturyinan attempttoimproveconditionsin
thesuburbs.Itsproponentsclaim,
among
otherthings,thatneo-traditionaidevelopmentwilllead todramatic reductions in driving. This paper argues that
neo-traditional development
may
reduce drivingandin-crease walking and transit use, but the benefits will
likely be
more
limited thansome
ofits proponentsclaim.
Intoday'senvironment,itisdifficult,ifnot
impos-sible, to have meaningful accesstothefullrangeof
activities in suburban areas without an automobile. Therefore,neo-traditional developmentswill reduce
drivingsignificantlyonlyifthey providesimilarlevelsof access to activities.
The
greatest effects can be expectedfor shoppingtrips in areaswhere
there arefewavailableshoppingcentersandforother
non-work
trips that can be
accommodated
on foot in aneo-traditionaldevelopment.This impliesaplanning
strat-egythatemphasizesneo-traditionaldevelopmentsin
fringe areas ratherthan in well-developed suburban
areas.
Application of
GIS
Techniques
toOpen
Space
Suitability
Modelling
intheWestern
Gary
Extra-territorial Jurisdiction by
Ed
WilsonThis paper analyzes the useof
GIS
techniques inopen space planning.
The
study area is a mostly undeveloped 1,500 acretractintheGary
Extraterrito-rial Jurisdiction(ETJ),justoutside ofpresent
Town
limits.
The
tractoccupiesthe entireareabounded
byfiveroads
(NC Highway
55andfourruralroads)and formstheupperportion ofthe PantherCreekwater-shed, which drains into Jordan Lake.
The
projectinvolvedcollectingdigitalandhardcopyspatialdataof various factors forthis tract, mostly landscape fea-tures1iketopography,land cover,andhydrology.Using
Arc-Info
GIS
software, these datawere
processed(manuallydigitized
where
required) andoverlaid inorderto
model
themost
suitableopenspaceareas.The
landscapefeaturesandresultsofthesuitability
model-lingwerepresentedina seriesofcolor
maps
plottedonaCalcomp
electro-staticplotter(approximately 40"by30").
The
possibleplanningapplicationsofsuch aninfor-mationbasearediscussed, buttheemphasisisonthe
processofselecting,obtaining,andprocessingthedata
fortheir ievel ofreliabilityand applicabilityin open
space planning.
Federal
Urban
Mass
TransportationFunding
and
theCase
ofNew
York
City'sSecond
Avenue
Subway
byMatt
Lawlor
New
railtransit systems intheU.S. have beenthe subjectofmuch
debateinthe lasttwentyyears. This debate has centeredontwo
aspectsofthese systems: constructioncostsandridershiplevels.By
and large,the
new
systems have cost farmore
than originallyplanned and attracted far fewer riders than fore-casted. Criticshave argued thattheserecent failures arecause
enough
to call intoquestiontheprocessby whichthe federalgovernment'sdiscretionary capital grantsprogramisrun.These programs haveprovidedamajorityofthefundingfortherecently buih systems.
Some
have evensuggested eliminatingthegrantpro-grams.
Thispaperseeksto
move
thedebatea stepfurther,and
compare
the relative capital cost and ridership benefits ofthenew
systems to the SecondAvenue
Subway,
asystemextensionprojectinNew
York
Citywhich
was
aborted due to lack of capital funding.Simplyput,thepaperpointsoutthatthefailureofthe
new
systemstoachievetheirobjectives,andthefailureofthe Second
Avenue
tobebuilt, areclosely linked.This provides further support forthose