• No results found

“CIGARETTE SMOKING…

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "“CIGARETTE SMOKING…"

Copied!
38
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Copyright © 1999-2012 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Updated February 2012.

Rx for CHANGE

Clinician-Assisted Tobacco Cessation

TRAINING OVERVIEW

Epidemiology of Tobacco Use

Forms of Tobacco

Nicotine Pharmacology & Principles of Addiction

Drug Interactions with Smoking

Assisting Patients with Quitting

Aids for Cessation

Tobacco Trigger Tapes

Role Playing with Case Scenarios and Video Counseling Sessions

EPIDEMIOLOGY

of TOBACCO USE is the chief, single,

avoidable cause of death in our society and the most

important public health issue of our time.”

C. Everett Koop, M.D., former U.S. Surgeon General

“CIGARETTE SMOKING…

All forms of tobacco are harmful.

World Health Organization Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic (2008).

WORLDWIDE ADULT TOBACCO USE PREVALENCE (Men/Women)

USA 21.5/17.3

UK/

Northern Ireland 27.0/25.0

China 66.0/3.1 Russian Federation

60.4/15.5

Japan 43.3/12.0

India 32.7/1.4 Brazil

20.3/12.8

South Africa 36.0/10.2

Iran 24.1/4.3

Philippines 57.5/12.3 France

33.3/26.5

TRENDS in ADULT CIGARETTE CONSUMPTION

U.S., 1900

2006

Annual adult per capita cigarette consumption and major smoking and health events

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (1999). MMWR 48:986–993.

Per-capita updates from U.S. Department of Agriculture, provided by the American Cancer Society.

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000

1900 1910192019301940 1950 19601970198019902000

1964 Surgeon General’s Report

Great Depression End of WW II

First modern reports linking smoking and

cancer Federal cigarette tax doubles

Master Settlement Agreement;

California first state to enact ban on smoking in bars Broadcast ad ban

Cigarette price drop Nonsmokers’

rights movement begins

Number of cigarettes

Year U.S. entry into

WW I

20 states have > $1 pack tax Marketing

of filtered cigarettes

(2)

Copyright © 1999-2012 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Updated February 2012.

Chaloupka FJ. (2010). The economics of tobacco taxation. Chicago, IL:

ImpacTEEN, University of Illinois at Chicago.

$1.50

$2.00

$2.50

$3.00

$3.50

$4.00

$4.50

15950 17950 19950 21950 23950 25950 27950 29950

1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 Price per pack (Oct 2009 dollars)

Sales (million packs)

Year

Sales Price

CIGARETTE PRICES and

CIGARETTE SALES, 1970–2009 TRENDS in ADULT SMOKING, by SEX—U.S., 1955–2010

Trends in cigarette current smoking among persons aged 18 or older

Graph provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1955 Current Population Survey; 1965–2010 NHIS. Estimates since 1992 include some-day smoking.

Percent

68.8% want to quit 52.4% tried to quit in the past year

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Male

Female 21.5%

17.3%

19.3% of adults are current

smokers

Year

STATE-SPECIFIC PREVALENCE of SMOKING among ADULTS, 2010

* Has smoked ≥ 100 cigarettes during lifetime and currently smokes either every day or some days.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2011). MMWR 60:1207–1212.

< 13.0%

13.0 – 15.9%

16.0 – 18.9%

19.0 – 21.9%

≥ 22.0%

Prevalence of current* smoking (2010)

PREVALENCE of ADULT SMOKING, by RACE/ETHNICITY—U.S., 2010

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2011). MMWR 60:1207–1212.

0 10 20 30 40

9.2%

25.9%

20.6%

21.0%

12.5%

31.4%

Percent Asian

American Indian/Alaska Native

Black White

Hispanic Multiple races

PREVALENCE of ADULT SMOKING, by EDUCATION—U.S., 2010

0 10 20 30 40 50

Percent Undergraduate degree

No high school diploma GED diploma High school graduate Some college

9.9%

Graduate degree

25.1%

23.8%

23.2%

6.3%

45.2%

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2011). MMWR 60:1207–1212.

TRENDS in TEEN SMOKING, by ETHNICITY—U.S., 1977–2010

Trends in cigarette smoking among 12th graders: 30-day prevalence of use

0 10 20 30 40 50

1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007

Year

Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Monitoring the Future Project www.monitoringthefuture.org

Percent

White

Hispanic

Black

(3)

Copyright © 1999-2012 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Updated February 2012.

PUBLIC HEALTH versus

“BIG TOBACCO”

The biggest opponent to tobacco control efforts is the tobacco

industry itself.

Nationally, the tobacco industry is outspending our state tobacco control funding.

For every $1 spent by the states, the tobacco industry spends $23 to market its products.

TOBACCO INDUSTRY MARKETING

$12.49 billion spent in the U.S. in 2006

$34.2 million a day

85.6% increase over 1998 figures

0 5 10 15

1970 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Billions of dollars spent

Year

Federal Trade Commission (FTC). (2009). Cigarette Report for 2006.

New marketing restrictions

The TOBACCO INDUSTRY

For decades, the tobacco industry publicly denied the addictive nature of nicotine and the negative health effects of tobacco.

April 14, 1994:Seven top executives of major tobacco companies state, under oath, that they believe nicotine is not addictive: http://www.jeffreywigand.com/7ceos.php

Tobacco industry documents indicate otherwise

Documents available at http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu

The cigarette is a heavily engineered product.

Designed and marketed to maximize bioavailability of nicotine and addictive potential

Profits over people

An EFFECTIVE MARKETING STRATEGY: “LIGHT” CIGARETTES

The difference between Marlboro and Marlboro Lights…

an extra row of ventilation holes

Image courtesy of Mayo Clinic Nicotine Dependence Center - Research Program / Dr. Richard D. Hurt The Marlboro and Marlboro Lights logos are registered trademarks of Philip Morris USA.

1932

(4)

Copyright © 1999-2012 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Updated February 2012.

1936 1990

SMOKING in MOVIES

Cigarette smoking is pervasive in movies

Evident in at least ¾ of box-office hits

Average, 10.9 smoking incidents per hour

Superman II (1980)

There is a dose-response, causal relationship between exposure to smoking in movies and youth smoking initiation

70% of adults support assigning an

“R” rating to movies with smoking.

National Cancer Institute. (2008). The Role of the Media in Promoting and Reducing Tobacco Use.

For more information on smoking in movies, go to http://smokefreemovies.ucsf.edu Charlesworth and Glantz. (2005). Pediatrics 116:1516–1528.

COMPOUNDS in TOBACCO SMOKE

Carbon monoxide

Hydrogen cyanide

Ammonia

Benzene

Formaldehyde

Nicotine

Nitrosamines

Lead

Cadmium

Polonium-210 An estimated 4,800 compounds in tobacco smoke,

including 11 proven human carcinogens

Gases Particles

Nicotine is the addictive component of tobacco products, but it does NOT cause the ill health effects of tobacco use.

ANNUAL U.S. DEATHS ATTRIBUTABLE to SMOKING, 2000–2004

29%

28%

23%

11%

8%

<1%

Cardiovascular diseases 128,497

Lung cancer 125,522

Respiratory diseases 103,338 Second-hand smoke 49,400 Cancers other than lung 35,326

Other 1,512

Percent of all smoking- attributable deaths

TOTAL: 443,595 deaths annually

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2008). MMWR 57:1226–1228.

ANNUAL SMOKING-ATTRIBUTABLE ECONOMIC COSTS

0 50 100 150 200

Health-care expenditures

Societal costs: $10.28 per pack of cigarettes smoked

Lost productivity costs

Total economic burden of smoking, per year

Billions of US dollars

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2008). MMWR 57:1226–1228.

Total Medicare program costs Total federal-state Medicaid program costs

$96.7 billion

$97.6 billion

$30.9 billion

$18.9 billion

$194 billion

(5)

Copyright © 1999-2012 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Updated February 2012.

2004 REPORT of the SURGEON GENERAL:

HEALTH CONSEQUENCES OF SMOKING

Smoking harms nearly every organ of the body, causing many diseases and reducing the health of smokers in general.

Quitting smoking has immediate as well as long-term benefits, reducing risks for diseases caused by smoking and improving health in general.

Smoking cigarettes with lower machine-measured yields of tar and nicotine provides no clear benefit to health.

The list of diseases caused by smoking has been expanded.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS). (2004).

The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General.

FOUR MAJOR CONCLUSIONS:

HEALTH CONSEQUENCES of SMOKING

Cancers

Acute myeloid leukemia

Bladder and kidney

Cervical

Esophageal

Gastric

Laryngeal

Lung

Oral cavity and pharyngeal

Pancreatic

Pulmonary diseases

Acute (e.g., pneumonia)

Chronic (e.g., COPD)

Cardiovascular diseases

Abdominal aortic aneurysm

Coronary heart disease

Cerebrovascular disease

Peripheral arterial disease

Reproductive effects

Reduced fertility in women

Poor pregnancy outcomes (e.g., low birth weight, preterm delivery)

Infant mortality

Other effects:cataract, osteoporosis, periodontitis, poor surgical outcomes

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS). (2004).

The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General.

HEALTH CONSEQUENCES of SMOKELESS TOBACCO USE

Periodontal effects

Gingival recession

Bone attachment loss

Dental caries Oral leukoplakia Cancer

Oral cancer

Pharyngeal cancer Oral Leukoplakia Image courtesy of Dr. Sol Silverman -

University of California San Francisco HERMAN ® is reprinted with permission from

LaughingStock Licensing Inc., Ottawa, Canada All rights reserved.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS). (2006).

The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: Report of the Surgeon General.

There is no safe level of second-hand

smoke.

Second-hand smoke causes premature death and disease in nonsmokers (children and adults)

Children:

Increased risk for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), acute respiratory infections, ear problems, and more severe asthma

2006 REPORT of the SURGEON GENERAL:

INVOLUNTARY EXPOSURE to TOBACCO SMOKE

Respiratory symptoms and slowed lung growth if parents smoke

Adults:

Immediate adverse effects on cardiovascular system

Increased risk for coronary heart disease and lung cancer

Millions of Americans are exposed to smoke in their homes/workplaces

Indoor spaces: eliminating smoking fully protects nonsmokers

Separating smoking areas, cleaning the air, and ventilation are ineffective

SMOKE-FREE WORKPLACE LAWS

Data current as of October 21, 2010.

Smoke-free offices, restaurants, and bars

Smoke-free restaurants and bars Smoke-free offices and restaurants

Smoke-free offices Smoke-free restaurants No statewide law

(6)

Copyright © 1999-2012 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Updated February 2012.

QUITTING: HEALTH BENEFITS

Lung cilia regain normal function

Ability to clear lungs of mucus increases

Coughing, fatigue, shortness of breath decrease

Excess risk of CHD decreases to half that of a continuing smoker

Risk of stroke is reduced to that of people who have never smoked

Lung cancer death rate drops to half that of a continuing smoker Risk of cancer of mouth, throat, esophagus, bladder, kidney, pancreas decrease

Risk of CHD is similar to that of people who have never smoked 2 weeks

to 3 months

1 to 9 months

1 year

5 years

10 years

after 15 years Time Since Quit Date Circulation improves,

walking becomes easier Lung function increases up to 30%

BENEFICIAL EFFECTS of QUITTING:

PULMONARY EFFECTS

Reprinted with permission. Fletcher & Peto. (1977). BMJ 1(6077):1645–1648.

Disability

Death

Smoked regularly and susceptible to effects of smoke

Never smoked or not susceptible to smoke

Stopped smoking at 45 (mild COPD)

Stopped smoking at 65 (severe COPD) 25

FEV1(% of value at age 25) 25 50 75 100

0

50 75

Age (years)

COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

AT ANY AGE, there are benefits of quitting.

Reduction in cumulative risk of

death from lung cancer in men

Reprinted with permission. Peto et al. (2000). BMJ 321(7257):323–329.

Cumulative risk (%)

Age in years

0 5 10 15

30 40 50 60

Years of life gained

Age at cessation (years)

Prospective study of 34,439 male British doctors

Mortality was monitored for 50 years (1951–2001) On average, cigarette smokers die approximately

10 years younger than do nonsmokers.

Among those who continue smoking, at least half

will die due to a tobacco-related disease.

SMOKING CESSATION:

REDUCED RISK of DEATH

Doll et al. (2004). BMJ 328(7455):1519–1527.

FINANCIAL IMPACT of SMOKING

Packs per day

Buying cigarettes every day for 50 years @ $5.95 per pack Money banked monthly, earning 2% interest

Dollars lost, in thousands

$755,177

$503,451

$251,725

0 200 400 600

$186,649

$373,298

$559,947

EPIDEMIOLOGY of TOBACCO USE: SUMMARY

About one in five adults are current smokers; smoking prevalence varies by sociodemographic characteristics.

Nearly half a million U.S. deaths are attributable to smoking annually.

Smoking costs the U.S. $193 billion per year. Lifetime financial costs of smoking approaches one million US dollars for a heavy smoker.

At any age, there are benefits to quitting smoking.

The biggest opponent to tobacco control efforts is the tobacco industry.

(7)

Copyright © 1999-2012 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Updated February 2012.

FORMS of TOBACCO

FORMS of TOBACCO

Cigarettes

Smokeless tobacco (chewing tobacco, oral snuff)

Pipes

Cigars

Clove cigarettes

Bidis

Hookah (waterpipe smoking)

Electronic cigarettes (“e-cigarettes”)*

Image courtesy of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention / Rick Ward

*e-cigarettes are devices that deliver nicotine and are not a form of tobacco.

AMERICAN CIGARETTES

Most common form of tobacco used in U.S.

Sold in packs (20 cigarettes/pack)

Total nicotine content, per cigarette:

-Average 13.5 mg (range, 11.9 to 14.5 mg)

Machine-measured nicotine yield:

Smoker’s nicotine yield, per cigarette:

-Approximately 1 to 2 mg

Marlboro and Marlboro Light are registered trademarks of Philip Morris, Inc.

Type of cigarette Yield per cigarette Full-flavor (regular) 1.1 mg

Light 0.8 mg

Ultra-light 0.4 mg

Average (all brands) 0.9 mg

SMOKELESS TOBACCO

Chewing tobacco

Looseleaf

Plug

Twist Snuff

Moist

Dry

The Copenhagen and Skoal logos are registered trademarks of U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Company, and Red Man is a registered trademark of Swedish Match.

SMOKELESS FORMS of TOBACCO

Estimated 8.6 million users in the U.S. in 2009

Males (6.7%) more likely than females (0.3%) to be current users

Prevalence highest among

Young adults aged 18-25 years

Residents of the Midwest and Southern U.S.

Residents of nonmetropolitan areas

Significant health risks

Numerous carcinogens

Nicotine exposure comparable to that of smokers, leading to

Physical dependence

Withdrawal symptoms after abstinence

NICOTINE CONTENT in

SMOKELESS TOBACCO PRODUCTS

Dose Product pH Total free

nicotine (mg/g)

Low Hawken Wintergreen 5.2 – 5.7 0.01 – 0.02 Skoal Bandits Wintergreen 6.9 – 7.1 0.5 – 1.0 Medium Skoal Long Cut Straight 7.5 – 7.6 2.4 – 3.7

High Kodiak Wintergreen 8.2 – 8.4 5.8 – 6.5

Copenhagen 7.6 – 8.6 3.1 – 9.4

Data from Hatsukami et al. (2007). Am J Prev Med 33(6S):S368–78.

(8)

Copyright © 1999-2012 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Updated February 2012.

HEALTH CONSEQUENCES of SMOKELESS TOBACCO USE

Periodontal effects

Gingival recession

Bone attachment loss

Dental caries Oral leukoplakia Cancer

Oral cancer

Pharyngeal cancer Oral Leukoplakia Image courtesy of Dr. Sol Silverman - University of California San Francisco

PIPE TOBACCO

Prevalence of pipe smoking in the U.S. is less than 1%

Pipe smokers have an increased risk of death due to:

Cancer (lung, oral cavity, esophagus, larynx)

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Risk of smoking tobacco-related death:

cigarettes > pipes ≈ cigars

CIGARS

Estimated 13.3 million cigar smokers in the U.S. in 2009

Tobacco content of cigars varies greatly

One cigar can deliver enough nicotine to establish and maintain dependence

Cigar smoking is not a safe alternative to cigarette smoking

CLOVE CIGARETTES (also known as KRETEKS)

Mixture of tobacco and cloves

Imported from Indonesia

In 2010, an estimated 4.6% of 12th graders in the U.S. reported smoking kreteks in the past year

Two times the tar and nicotine content of standard cigarettes

BIDIS

Imported from India

Resemble marijuana joints

Available in candy flavors

In 2010, an estimated 1.4% of 12thgraders in the U.S. reported smoking bidis in the past year

Deliver 3-fold higher levels of carbon monoxide and nicotine and 5-fold higher levels of tar when compared to standard cigarettes

Image courtesy of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention / Dr. Clifford H. Watson

HOOKAH (WATERPIPE SMOKING)

Also known as

Shisha, Narghile, Goza, Hubble bubble

Tobacco flavored with fruit pulp, honey, and molasses

Increasingly popular among young adults in coffee houses, bars, and lounges

An estimated 7-10% of U.S. college students currently smoke hookah

Nicotine, tar and carbon monoxide levels comparable to or higher than those in cigarette smoke

Image courtesy of Mr. Sami Romman / www.hookah-shisha.com

(9)

Copyright © 1999-2012 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Updated February 2012.

ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES

Battery operated devices that deliver vaporized nicotine

Cartridges contain nicotine, flavoring agents, and other chemicals

Battery warms cartridge; user inhales nicotine vapor or ‘smoke’

Available on-line and in shopping malls

Not labeled with health warnings

Preliminary FDA testing found some cartridges contain carcinogens and impurities (e.g., diethylene glycol)

No data to support claims that these products are a safe alternative to smoking

POTENTIALLY REDUCED-EXPOSURE PRODUCTS (PREPs)

Tobacco formulations altered to minimize exposure to harmful chemicals in tobacco

Cigarette-like delivery devices

Eclipse, Heatbar

Oral noncombustible tobacco products

Ariva, Marlboro Snus, Stonewall, Camel Snus

No evidence to prove that PREPs reduce the risk of developing tobacco-related disease

FORMS of TOBACCO: SUMMARY

Cigarettes are, by far, the most common form of tobacco used in the U.S.

Other forms of tobacco and nicotine delivery devices exist, and some are increasing in popularity.

All forms of tobacco are harmful.

The safety/efficacy of e-cigarettes is not established.

Attention to all forms of tobacco is needed.

NICOTINE PHARMACOLOGY and PRINCIPLES of ADDICTION

NICOTINE ADDICTION

U.S. Surgeon General’s Report (1988)

Cigarettes and other forms of tobacco are addicting.

Nicotine is the drug in tobacco that causes addiction.

The pharmacologic and behavioral processes that determine tobacco addiction are similar to those that determine addiction to drugs such as heroin and cocaine.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1988). The Health Consequences of Smoking: Nicotine Addiction. A Report of the Surgeon General.

(10)

Copyright © 1999-2012 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Updated February 2012.

Nicotiana tabacum Natural liquid alkaloid Colorless, volatile base pKa = 8.0

N CH3 N

H

Pyridine ring

Pyrrolidine ring

CHEMISTRY of NICOTINE PHARMACOLOGY

Effects of the body on the drug

Absorption

Distribution

Metabolism

Excretion

Effects of the drug on the body Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacodynamics

NICOTINE ABSORPTION

Absorption is pH dependent

In acidic media

Ionized  poorly absorbed across membranes

In alkaline media

Nonionized  well absorbed across membranes

At physiologic pH (7.4), ~31% of nicotine is nonionized

At physiologic pH, nicotine is readily absorbed.

NICOTINE ABSORPTION:

BUCCAL (ORAL) MUCOSA

The pH inside the mouth is 7.0.

Acidic media (limited absorption)

Cigarettes

Alkaline media (significant absorption)

Pipes, cigars, spit tobacco, oral nicotine products

Beverages can alter pH, affect absorption.

NICOTINE ABSORPTION: SKIN and GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT

Nicotine is readily absorbed through intact skin.

Nicotine is well absorbed in the small intestine but has low bioavailability (20-45%) due to first-pass hepatic metabolism.

NICOTINE ABSORPTION: LUNG

Nicotine is “distilled” from burning tobacco and carried in tar droplets.

Nicotine is rapidly absorbed across respiratory epithelium.

Lung pH = 7.4

Large alveolar surface area

Extensive capillary system in lung

Approximately 1 mg of nicotine is absorbed from each cigarette.

(11)

Copyright © 1999-2012 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Updated February 2012.

NICOTINE DISTRIBUTION

Henningfield et al. (1993). Drug Alcohol Depend 33:23–29.

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Minutes after light-up of cigarette Plasma nicotine (ng/ml) Arterial

Venous

Nicotine reaches the brain within 10–20 seconds.

Metabolized and excreted

in urine

NICOTINE METABOLISM

CH3 N

H 10–20%

excreted unchanged in urine

Adapted and reprinted with permission. Benowitz et al. (1994). J Pharmacol Exp Ther 268:296–303.

70–80%

cotinine ~ 10% other metabolites

N

NICOTINE EXCRETION

Half-life

Nicotine t½= 2 hr

Cotinine t½= 16 hr

Excretion

Occurs through kidneys (pH dependent;

 with acidic pH)

Through breast milk

NICOTINE

PHARMACODYNAMICS

Nicotine binds to receptors in the brain and other

sites in the body.

Other:

Neuromuscular junction Sensory receptors Other organs

Central nervous system

Exocrine glands Adrenal medulla

Peripheral nervous system Gastrointestinal system

Cardiovascular system

Nicotine has predominantly stimulatory effects.

NICOTINE

PHARMACODYNAMICS

(cont’d) Central nervous system

Pleasure

Arousal, enhanced vigilance

Improved task performance

Anxiety relief

Other

Appetite suppression

Increased metabolic rate

Skeletal muscle relaxation

Cardiovascular system

 Heart rate

 Cardiac output

 Blood pressure

Coronary vasoconstriction

Cutaneous vasoconstriction

NEUROCHEMICAL and RELATED EFFECTS of NICOTINE

Dopamine

Norepinephrine

Acetylcholine

Glutamate

Serotonin

-Endorphin

GABA N I C O T I N E

 Pleasure, appetite suppression

 Arousal, appetite suppression

 Arousal, cognitive enhancement

 Learning, memory enhancement

 Mood modulation, appetite suppression

 Reduction of anxiety and tension

 Reduction of anxiety and tension

Benowitz. (2008). Clin Pharmacol Ther 83:531–541.

(12)

Copyright © 1999-2012 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Updated February 2012.

WHAT IS ADDICTION?

”Compulsive drug use, without medical purpose, in the face of

negative consequences”

Alan I. Leshner, Ph.D.

Former Director, National Institute on Drug Abuse National Institutes of Health

BIOLOGY of NICOTINE ADDICTION:

ROLE of DOPAMINE

Nicotine stimulates dopamine release

Repeat administration

Tolerance develops Discontinuation leads to

withdrawal symptoms.

Pleasurable feelings

Nicotine addiction

is not just a bad habit.

Benowitz. (2008). Clin Pharmacol Ther 83:531–541.

Nicotine enters brain

Stimulation of nicotine receptors Dopamine release

DOPAMINE REWARD PATHWAY

Prefrontal cortex

Nucleus accumbens

Ventral tegmental

area

CHRONIC ADMINISTRATION of NICOTINE: EFFECTS on the BRAIN

Perry et al. (1999). J Pharmacol Exp Ther 289:1545–1552.

Nonsmoker Smoker

Human smokers have increased nicotine receptors in the prefrontal cortex.

High

Low

Image courtesy of George Washington University / Dr. David C. Perry

Irritability/frustration/anger

Anxiety

Difficulty concentrating

Restlessness/impatience

Depressed mood/depression

Insomnia

Impaired performance

Increased appetite/weight gain

Cravings

NICOTINE PHARMACODYNAMICS:

WITHDRAWAL EFFECTS

Hughes. (2007). Nicotine Tob Res 9:315–327.

Most symptoms manifest within the first 1–2 days, peak within the first week, and subside within

2–4 weeks.

HANDOUT

NICOTINE ADDICTION CYCLE

Reprinted with permission. Benowitz. (1992). Med Clin N Am 2:415–437.

(13)

Copyright © 1999-2012 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Updated February 2012.

NICOTINE ADDICTION

Tobacco users maintain a minimum serum nicotine concentration in order to

Prevent withdrawal symptoms

Maintain pleasure/arousal

Modulate mood

Users self-titrate nicotine intake by

Smoking/dipping more frequently

Smoking more intensely

Obstructing vents on low-nicotine brand cigarettes

Benowitz. (2008). Clin Pharmacol Ther 83:531–541.

ASSESSING

NICOTINE DEPENDENCE

Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND)

Developed in 1978 (8 items); revised in 1991 (6 items)

Most common research measure of nicotine dependence;

sometimes used in clinical practice

Responses coded such that higher scores indicate higher levels of dependence

Scores range from 0 to 10; score of greater than 5 indicates substantial dependence

Heatherton et al. (1991). British Journal of Addiction 86:1119–1127.

HANDOUT

CLOSE TO HOME © 2000 John McPherson.

Reprinted with permission of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE.

All rights reserved.

FACTORS CONTRIBUTING to TOBACCO USE

Physiology

Age, sex

Genetic predisposition

Coexisting medical conditions

Environment

Tobacco advertising

Conditioned stimuli

Social interactions

Pharmacology

Alleviation of withdrawal symptoms

Weight control

Pleasure, mood modulation

Tobacco Use

TOBACCO DEPENDENCE:

A 2-PART PROBLEM

Tobacco Dependence

Treatment should address the physiological and the behavioral aspects of dependence.

Physiological Behavioral

Treatment Treatment

The addiction to nicotine

Medications for cessation

The habit of using tobacco

Behavior change program

NICOTINE PHARMACOLOGY and ADDICTION: SUMMARY

Tobacco products are effective delivery systemsfor the drug nicotine.

Nicotine is a highly addictive drugthat induces a constellation of pharmacologic effects.

Nicotine activates the dopamine reward pathwayin the brain, which reinforces continued tobacco use.

Tobacco users who are dependent on nicotine self- regulate tobaccointake to maintain pleasurable effects and prevent withdrawal.

(14)

Copyright © 1999-2012 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Updated February 2012.

NICOTINE PHARMACOLOGY and ADDICTION: SUMMARY

(cont’d)

Nicotine dependence is a chronic disorder.

Tobacco use is complex, involving the interplay of the following:

Pharmacology of nicotine (pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics)

Environmental factors

Physiologic factors

Treatment of tobacco use and dependence requires a multifaceted treatment approach.

DRUG INTERACTIONS with SMOKING

PHARMACOKINETIC DRUG INTERACTIONS with SMOKING

Drugs that may have a decreased effectdue to induction of CYP1A2:

Bendamustine Olanzapine

Caffeine Ropinirole

Clozapine Tacrine

Erlotinib Theophylline

Fluvoxamine

Irinotecan(clearance increased and systemic exposure decreased, due to increased glucuronidation of its active metabolite)

Smoking cessation will reverse these effects.

HANDOUT

PHARMACOKINETIC DRUG

INTERACTIONS with SMOKING, cont’d Drug that might have an increased effect and efficacy due to induction of CYP1A2:

Clopidogrel

Smoking cessation will reverse these effects.

HANDOUT

PHARMACODYNAMIC DRUG INTERACTIONS with SMOKING

Smokers who use combined hormonal

contraceptives have an increased risk of serious cardiovascular adverse effects:

Stroke

Myocardial infarction

Thromboembolism

This interaction does not decrease the efficacy of hormonal contraceptives.

Women who are 35 years of age or older AND smoke at least 15 cigarettes per day are at significantly elevated risk.

DRUG INTERACTIONS with SMOKING: SUMMARY

Clinicians should be aware of their patients’

smoking status:

Clinically significant interactions result the combustion products of tobacco smoke, not from nicotine.

Constituents in tobacco smoke (e.g., polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; PAHs) may enhance the metabolism of other drugs, resulting in an altered pharmacologic response.

Smoking might adversely affect the clinical response to the treatment of a wide variety of conditions.

Drug interactions with smoking should be considered when patients start smoking, quit smoking, or markedly alter their levels of smoking.

(15)

Copyright © 1999-2012 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Updated February 2012.

ASSISTING PATIENTS

with QUITTING

Update released May 2008

Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Heath Service with:

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

National Heart, Lung, & Blood Institute

National Institute on Drug Abuse

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Cancer Institute

www.surgeongeneral.gov/tobacco/

CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE for TREATING TOBACCO USE and DEPENDENCE

HANDOUT

EFFECTS of CLINICIAN INTERVENTIONS

0 10 20 30

No clinician Self-help

material Nonphysician clinician Physician

clinician Type of Clinician

Estimated abstinence at 5+ months

1.0 1.1

1.7 2.2

n = 29 studies

Fiore et al. (2008). Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update.

Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: USDHHS, PHS, May 2008.

With help from a clinician, the odds of quitting approximately doubles.

Compared to patients who receive no assistance from a clinician, patients who receive assistance are 1.7–2.2 times as likely to quit successfully for 5 or more months.

Estimated abstinence rate at 5+ months 0 10 20 30

None One Two Three or more

Number of Clinician Types

1.0

1.8

(1.5,2.2)

2.5

(1.9,3.4) 2.4

(2.1,3.4) n = 37 studies

NUMBER of CLINICIAN TYPES CAN MAKE a DIFFERENCE, too

Compared to smokers who receive assistance from no clinicians, smokers who receive assistance from two or more clinician types are 2.4–2.5 times as likely to quit successfully for 5 or more months.

Fiore et al. (2008). Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update.

Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: USDHHS, PHS, May 2008.

Tobacco users expect to be encouraged to quit by health professionals.

Screening for tobacco use and providing tobacco cessation counseling are positively associated with patient satisfaction (Barzilai et al., 2001).

Barzilai et al. (2001). Prev Med 33:595–599.

Failure to address tobacco use tacitly implies that quitting is not important.

WHY SHOULD CLINICIANS ADDRESS TOBACCO?

ASK ADVISE ASSESS ASSIST ARRANGE

The 5 A’s

HANDOUT Fiore et al. (2008). Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update.

Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: USDHHS, PHS, May 2008.

(16)

Copyright © 1999-2012 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Updated February 2012.

The 5 A’s

(cont’d)

Ask about tobacco use

“Do you ever smoke or use any type of tobacco?”

“I take time to ask all of my patients about tobacco use—because it’s important.”

“Condition X often is caused or worsened by smoking.

Do you, or does someone in your household smoke?”

“Medication X often is used for conditions linked with or caused by smoking. Do you, or does someone in your household smoke?”

ASK tobacco users to quit (clear, strong,

personalized)

“It’s important that you quit as soon as possible, and I can help you.”

“Cutting down while you are ill is not enough.”

“Occasional or light smoking is still harmful.”

“I realize that quitting is difficult. It is the most important thing you can do to protect your health now and in the future. I have training to help my patients quit, and when you are ready, I will work with you to design a specialized treatment plan.”

ADVISE

The 5 A’s

(cont’d)

The 5 A’s

(cont’d)

Assess readiness to make a quit attemptASSESS

Assist with the quit attempt

Not ready to quit: provide motivation (the 5 R’s)

Ready to quit: design a treatment plan

Recently quit: relapse prevention ASSIST

Arrange follow-up careARRANGE

The 5 A’s

(cont’d)

Number of sessions Estimated quit rate*

0 to 1 12.4%

2 to 3 16.3%

4 to 8 20.9%

More than 8 24.7%

* 5 months (or more) postcessation

Provide assistance throughout the quit attempt.

Fiore et al. (2008). Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update.

Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: USDHHS, PHS, May 2008.

The 5 A’s: REVIEW

ASK about tobacco USE

ADVISE tobacco users to QUIT

ASSESS READINESS to make a quit attempt

ASSIST with the QUIT ATTEMPT

ARRANGE FOLLOW-UP care

Faced with change, most people are not ready to act.

Change is a process, not a single step.

Typically, it takes multiple attempts.

HOW CAN I LIVE WITHOUT TOBACCO?

The (DIFFICULT) DECISION

to QUIT

(17)

Copyright © 1999-2012 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Updated February 2012.

HELPING PATIENTS QUIT IS a CLINICIAN’S RESPONSIBILITY

THE DECISIONTO QUIT LIES IN THE HANDS OF EACH PATIENT.

TOBACCO USERS DON’T PLAN TO FAIL.

MOST FAIL TO PLAN.

Clinicians have a professional obligation to address tobacco use and can have

an important role in helping patients plan for their quit attempts.

STAGE 1: Not ready to quit in the next month STAGE 2: Ready to quit in the next month STAGE 3: Recent quitter, quit within past 6 months STAGE 4: Former tobacco user, quit > 6 months ago

ASSESSING

READINESS to QUIT

Patients differ in their readiness to quit.

Assessing a patient’s readiness to quit enables clinicians to deliver relevant, appropriate counseling messages.

Former tobacco user

Recent quitter

Ready to quit

Not ready to quit Relapse

Not thinking about it

Thinking about it, not ready

For most patients, quitting is a cyclical process, and their readiness to quit (or stay quit) will change over time.

Assess readiness to quit

(or to stay quit) at each patient

contact.

ASSESSING

READINESS to QUIT

(cont’d)

IS a PATIENT READY to QUIT?

Does the patient now use tobacco?

Is the patient now ready to quit?

Provide treatment

The 5 A’s Enhance

motivation

Yes

Yes No

Did the patient once use tobacco?

Prevent

relapse* Encourage

continued abstinence Yes

No

No

*Relapse prevention interventions not necessary if patient has not used tobacco for many years and is not at risk for re-initiation.

Fiore et al. (2008). Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update.

Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: USDHHS, PHS, May 2008.

STAGE 1: Not ready to quit

Not thinking about quitting in the next month

Some patients are aware of the need to quit.

Patients struggle with ambivalence about change.

Patients are not ready to change, yet.

Pros of continued tobacco use outweigh the cons.

GOAL:Start thinking about quitting.

ASSESSING

READINESS to QUIT

(cont’d)

STAGE 1: NOT READY to QUIT Counseling Strategies

DON’T

Persuade

“Cheerlead”

Tell patient how bad tobacco is, in a judgmental manner

Provide a treatment plan DO

Strongly advise to quit

Provide information

Ask noninvasive questions;

identify reasons for tobacco use

Raise awareness of health consequences/concerns

Demonstrate empathy, foster communication

Leave decision up to patient

(18)

Copyright © 1999-2012 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Updated February 2012.

Consider asking:

“Do you ever plan to quit?”

“What might be some of the benefits of quitting now, instead of later?”

“What would have to change for you to decide to quit sooner?”

STAGE 1: NOT READY to QUIT Counseling Strategies

(cont’d)

If YES If NO

Advise patients to quit, and offer to assist (if or when they change their mind).

Most patients will agree: there is no “good” time to quit, and there are benefits to quitting sooner as opposed to later.

Responses will reveal some of the barriers to quitting.

The 5 R’s—Methods for enhancing motivation:

Relevance

Risks

Rewards

Roadblocks

Repetition

Tailored, motivational

messages

STAGE 1: NOT READY to QUIT Counseling Strategies

(cont’d)

Fiore et al. (2008). Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update.

Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: USDHHS, PHS, May 2008.

STAGE 1: NOT READY to QUIT A Demonstration

CASE SCENARIO:

Ms. Lilly Vitale

You are a clinician providing care to Ms. Vitale, a young woman with early-stage emphysema.

VIDEO # V6a

Ready to quit in the next month

Patients are aware of the need to, and the benefits of, making the behavioral change.

Patients are getting ready to take action.

STAGE 2: Ready to quit

GOAL:Achieve cessation.

ASSESSING

READINESS to QUIT

(cont’d)

Assess tobacco use history

Discuss key issues

Facilitate quitting process

Practical counseling (problem solving/skills training)

Social support delivered as part of treatment

STAGE 2: READY to QUIT

Three Key Elements of Counseling STAGE 2: READY to QUIT Assess Tobacco Use History

Praise the patient’s readiness

Assess tobacco use history

Current use: type(s) of tobacco, amount

Past use: duration, recent changes

Past quit attempts:

Number, date, length

Methods used, compliance, duration

Reasons for relapse

References

Related documents

STAGE 1: Not ready to quit in the next month STAGE 2: Ready to quit in the next month STAGE 3: Recent quitter, quit within past 6 months STAGE 4: Former tobacco user, quit &gt; 6

 The Tobacco Use Log is most appropriate for patients who are getting ready to quit.  Documenting tobacco use helps patients to understand when and why they

We’ll also need to work hard on preparing your environment to make it conducive to quitting; getting support from your friends and family; and preparing you, mentally, to be ready

There are several different methods of quitting, but because you’re pregnant, it’s best not to use medications to help you quit.. Two options are to quit cold turkey or to try to

STAGE 2: READY to QUIT Facilitate Quitting Process (cont’d) Tobacco Use Log: Instructions for use. „ Discuss

STAGE 2: READY to QUIT Facilitate Quitting Process (cont’d) Tobacco Use Log: Instructions for use. „ Discuss

STAGE 2: READY to QUIT Facilitate Quitting Process (cont’d) Tobacco Use Log: Instructions for use. „ Discuss

STAGE 2: READY to QUIT Facilitate Quitting Process (cont’d) Tobacco Use Log: Instructions for use.  Discuss