• No results found

Accounting 2. Lecture no 6. Prepared by: Jan Hájek

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Accounting 2. Lecture no 6. Prepared by: Jan Hájek"

Copied!
32
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Prepared by:

Jan Hájek

Accounting 2

(2)

Share-based Payment

Related standards

IFRS 2

Current GAAP comparisons

Looking ahead

(3)

Related Standards

(4)

IFRS 2 – Overview

Objective and scope

Recognition

Equity-settled share-based payment

transactions

Cash-settled share-based payment

transactions

Share-based payment transactions with cash

alternatives

(5)

IFRS 2 – Objective and Scope

Deals with transactions where equity instruments are used as

consideration

Entities must recognize these types of transactions

 If they create liabilities, they must be remeasured after the transaction date

Examples of share-based payment transactions

 Remunerative option plans such as employee stock options plans  Acquisitions where shares are used as consideration

 Situations where services are paid for with equity instruments

Accounting for employee remuneration plans can be complex

 These plans often span numerous reporting periods

(6)

IFRS 2 – Objective and Scope

(7)

IFRS 2 – Objective and Scope

 The third category is where there is a choice to settle in cash or equity

 Either the entity has the option to determine whether to settle the transaction in cash

or equity, or the counterparty has this option

Share-based payment transactions

 Defined as transactions in which the entity receives goods or services as

consideration for equity instruments of the entity (including shares or share options), or

 Acquires goods or services by incurring liabilities to the supplier of those goods or

services for amounts that are based on the price of the entity’s shares or other equity instruments of the entity

 Situations where the employee is dealing with the entity as a shareholder  Not covered by IFRS 2

(8)
(9)

IFRS 2 – Recognition

In general, the standard requires that the

transaction be recognized when the goods

are received or services rendered

The credit is booked to equity in an

equity-settled transaction and the liability in a

cash-settled transaction

The debit is booked to expense or asset (if

(10)

IFRS 2 – Equity-settled Share-based Payment

Transactions

Overview

For equity-settled transactions

 Transaction is measured at the fair value of the goods or services received  If the fair value cannot be reliably measured, then the fair value of the equity

instrument is used

There is a rebuttable presumption that the fair value of the goods and

services may be reliably measured

 In most cases, the fair value of the equity instruments would not be used

An exception to this is where the transaction involves employees rendering

services

 Transactions are measured by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments  May be too difficult to measure the services if the equity instruments are given to

(11)

IFRS 2 – Equity-settled Share-based Payment

Transactions

Transactions in which services are received

Accounting might be affected by the vesting provisions

Share-based transactions such as options have conditions attached to them

 Must be met before the counterparty has legal entitlement to them

Legal entitlement is referred to as vesting

Vesting

 If the equity instruments vest upfront when the contract is entered into

○ The entity assumes that the services have already been provided and recognizes the

full amount of the transaction at that date

 If the equity instruments vest over time

(12)

IFRS 2 – Equity-settled Share-based Payment

Transactions

Transactions in which services are received (continued)

Options granted conditional upon the employee achieving certain goals

 Vesting period must also be conditional upon achieving those goals

 Entity must estimate the vesting period in order to calculate the amount of expense

to recognize in each period

 Estimate may be revised in a subsequent period as a change in estimate

 If the condition is a market condition (such as the shares reaching a certain price)

no subsequent revision is allowed

○ Market would have already included expectations about the future share price into the

(13)

IFRS 2 – Equity-settled Share-based Payment

Transactions

Transactions measured by reference to the fair value of the equity

instruments granted

Determining the fair value of equity instruments granted

 Estimated as at the measurement date based on market conditions and prices

 Measurement date

 Generally the grant date for transactions with employees

 For other transactions, is the date that the goods are received or the services

rendered

 Grant date

(14)
(15)

IFRS 2 – Equity-settled Share-based Payment

Transactions

Determining the fair value of equity instruments granted (continued)

Market values

 If the equity instruments are publicly traded shares, they are available  If they are stock options, they may or may not be available

Options pricing models

 Valuation techniques - often used

 E.g., Black-Scholes and binomial models

Model inputs

(a) Exercise price (b) Life of the option

(c) Current price of the shares

(16)

IFRS 2 – Equity-settled Share-based Payment

Transactions

Treatment of vesting conditions

 There may be certain conditions attached to the transaction that must be met before

the counterparty or employee has legal entitlement (i.e., before the instruments vest)

 At the grant date

 The transaction is recognized and measured but the vesting conditions are not factored

into the measurement

 After the grant date

 The transaction is remeasured for the change in the number of equity instruments due

to the conditions being met/not met, but not for the fair value of the equity instrument itself

 Subsequent remeasurements are treated as a change in estimate in subsequent

periods

(17)

IFRS 2 – Equity-settled Share-based Payment

Transactions

Treatment of non-vesting conditions

 Uncertainty might also be introduced with non-vesting conditions

 Number of equity instruments to be issued might vary depending on some future event

 In these cases, the transaction is recognized and measured at the grant date and the

uncertainty is factored in at that point

 No remeasurement after the vesting date

Treatment of a reload feature

 Contract may allow the entity to automatically issue new options when an old one is

exercised using shares to satisfy the exercise price

 These are treated as new option grants and reload features are not taken into account

(18)

IFRS 2 – Equity-settled Share-based Payment

Transactions

After vesting date

 After initial recognition upon vesting

 Equity-settled transactions are not remeasured even if the equity instruments are

forfeited

 Entity may transfer amounts from one category of equity to another

If the fair value of the equity instrument cannot be reliably estimated

 Where the entity is required to measure the transaction at fair value, it may use the

intrinsic value

Intrinsic value

 Difference between the fair value of the shares to which the counterparty has the right to

subscribe or which it has the right to receive, and the price the counterparty is required to pay for those shares

 Transaction continues to be remeasured until the equity instrument is settled/exercised

(19)

IFRS 2 – Equity-settled Share-based Payment

Transactions

Modifications to the terms and conditions

 If the equity instrument is modified afterwards and the total fair value of the

transaction is increased, then this additional amount is recognized

 If the entity cancels or settles the grant of the equity instrument during the vesting

period

 Treats this as an acceleration of the vesting period

 Recognizes all remaining amounts

 Any cash payments are treated as a repurchase of equity (deducted from equity)  Only exception is where the payment is greater than the fair value of the equity

instruments granted

 Excess is charged to expense

(20)

IFRS 2 - Equity-settled Share-based Payment

Transactions -

Example 1

On 1 July 2011, Supplier X provides Reporting Entity

Ltd with some inventory, which has a fair value of $140

000. In exchange for the inventory, Reporting Entity Ltd

provides Supplier X with 10 000 shares in Reporting

Entity Ltd

As it is considered that the fair value of the inventory

can be determined ‘reliably’, this is deemed to be the

value of the shares being issued. The accounting entry

would be:

Dr Inventory

140 000

(21)

Employee X provides her services to Reporting Entity Ltd in

exchange for 10 000 options in the entity. All services have been

performed and the options have been granted to Employee X. The

options are considered to have a market value of $1.50 each

In this case, which involves an employee, the reporting entity would

not determine the fair value of the services being provided but

instead would consider the fair value of the options

Dr Employee benefits expense

15 000

Cr Share capital

15 000

If the goods or services were received in an equity-settled

share-based payment transaction, an increase in equity is recognised. If

they were received as part of a cash-settled share-based

transaction, a liability is to be recognised

(22)

IFRS 2 – Cash-settled Share-based Payment

Transactions

 Where the transaction will eventually be settled in cash

 Liability is recognized

 Transaction is measured at the fair value of the liability at the measurement date  Liability is subsequently remeasured at every reporting date

 Additional expenses/income due to the remeasurement are booked to profit and loss

Share appreciation rights (SARs)

 For transactions involving options/share appreciation rights the fair value of the liability

is measured at the fair value of the options/SAR

 Under this type of contract, an employee is granted a certain number of rights as

remuneration for services

 Rights allow the employee to be paid the excess of the market value of a share

(23)

IFRS 2 – Cash-settled Share-based Payment

Transactions

Share appreciation rights (SARs) continued

Accounting may be inconsistent with IAS 32

 In cases where the SAR may be settled in shares (according to the terms of the SAR)

Under IFRS 2

 If the SAR is to be settled with shares (i.e., a variable number of shares) it is

accounted for as equity

• Measured at the fair value of the SAR at the grant date • Credited to equity

• Not subsequently remeasured after vesting date

Under IAS 32

 If the number of shares is variable, the instrument would be accounted for as a

(24)

On 1 July 2012 Coogee Ltd provides its managing director with a

share-based incentive according to which she is offered a bonus that is

calculated as 200 000 times the increase in the fair value of the entity’s

share price above $2.50

When the bonus was offered the share price was $2.25

If the managing director does not leave the organisation the accrued

entitlement will be paid after three years. However, if she leaves the

organisation the accrued entitlement will be paid out upon departure—that

is, the benefit will not be forfeited

Other information

The share price at 30 June 2013 is $3.00

The share price at 30 June 2014 is $2.90

The share price at 30 June 2015 is $4.10

The managing director stays for three years and is paid the bonus on 1

July 2015

REQUIRED

Prepare the journal entries that would appear in the accounting records of

Coogee Ltd to account for the issue of the share appreciation rights

(25)

Remuneration

Year end Calculation expense for period

30 June 2013 200 000 × ($3.00 – $2.50) $100 000 30 June 2014 200 000 × ($2.90 – $2.50) – $100 000 ($20 000) 30 June 2015 200 000 × ($4.10 – $2.50) – $80 000 $240 000

30 June 2013

Dr Employee benefits expense 100 000

Cr Accrued salaries payable 100 000

30 June 2014

Dr Accrued salaries payable 20 000

Cr Employee benefits expense recouped (revenue) 20 000

30 June 2015

Dr Employee benefits expense 240 000

Cr Accrued salaries payable 240 000

1 July 2016

Dr Accrued salaries payable 320 000

Cr Bank 320 000

(26)

IFRS 2 – Share-based Payment Transactions

with Cash Alternatives

Share-based payment transactions in which the terms of the arrangement

provide the counterparty with a choice of settlement

Where the counterparty has the option to dictate settlement, it is beyond the

control of the entity and a liability may exist

In reality, this is a compound instrument

 Part debt (the right to demand payment in cash)  Part equity (the right to demand payment in shares)

For transactions other than with employees and where the entire transaction

is measured at fair value of the goods/services

 The equity component is the difference between the total transaction value and fair

(27)

IFRS 2 – Share-based Payment Transactions

with Cash Alternatives

Share-based payment transactions in which the terms of the arrangement

provide the counterparty with a choice of settlement (continued)

For other transactions, where the equity instrument is used to value the

transaction

• Measure fair value of debt component

• Measure the equity component (considering that the entity must forfeit the right to the shares if the counterparty exercises the option to be paid in cash)

As an added complexity, the entity must split the transaction into two parts

 the debt part

 the equity part

The debit side of the journal entry (the expense) is also split into two parts

 The debt part is accounted for as a cash-settled transaction

(28)

IFRS 2 – Share-based Payment Transactions

with Cash Alternatives

Share-based payment transactions in which the terms of the arrangement

provide the entity with a choice of settlement

Where the entity has the choice of settlement options, the entity determines

whether it has a liability (a present obligation to settle in cash)

Where the choice has no commercial substance

 A liability exists

 The transaction is accounted for as a cash-settled transaction  Otherwise, it is accounted for as an equity-settled transaction

If the entity assumes equity settlement and subsequently settles in cash

 This is treated as a share buyback or repurchase of an equity interest (debit equity)  Unless the settlement alternative is the one with the higher fair value, in which case

(29)

IFRS 2 – Disclosures

 The entity must disclose sufficient information for the users

 To understand the nature and extent of these transactions  To understand the impact on the profit or loss statement

 Specific disclosures

(a) A description of each type of share-based payment arrangement that existed at any time during the period

(b) The number and weighted average exercise prices of share options for each of the following groups of options

(i) Outstanding at the beginning of the period (ii) Granted during the period

(iii) Forfeited during the period (iv) Exercised during the period (v) Expired during the period

(30)

IFRS 2 – Disclosures

(c) For share options exercised during the period, the weighted average share price at the date of exercise.

(d) For share options outstanding at the end of the period, the range of exercise prices and weighted average remaining contractual life.

(31)

Current GAAP Comparisons

If fair value of received goods/services not reliably

measurable, IFRS uses fair value of non-tradable

equity instruments

Measurement dates for share-based payments

differ

(32)

Current GAAP Comparisons

Differences in dealing with modifications of

awards

Cash-settled share-based payments

measured at fair value of liability under

IFRS (intrinsic value under Canadian

GAAP)

Where counterparty has choice of

settlement, IFRS requires treatment as

cash settled transaction if entity has

References

Related documents

Fair value of the individual equity instrument, measured at measurement date B: Number of instruments expected to vest C: Total amount to be recognised for the goods/..

If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss has been incurred on an unquoted equity instrument that is not carried at fair value because its fair value cannot be

c) investments in equity instruments not quoted in the active market, whose fair value cannot be reliably measured, as well as related to them derivatives

If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss on an unquoted equity instrument that is not carried at fair value since its fair value cannot be reliably measured, or on

If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss on an unquoted equity instrument that is not carried at fair value because its fair value cannot be reliably measured, or on

According to the law of conservation of energy: A.Energy can neither be created nor destroyed B.Energy can be converted from one form to another C.Kinetic Energy can be changed

Learn how to use Environmental Monitoring Data Trends to evaluate cleaning efficacy Discussion on FDA 483 observations related disinfectant qualification and cleaning procedures.

Cohen Mimis : IPRAS Chairman of the Scientific Advisory Board Honorary Chairman Cohen Mimis Course Director Tsoutsos Dimosthenis Course Co-organizer Yiacoumettis Andreas Members