• No results found

ANSI A250.4 Test Procedure and Acceptance Criteria for Physical Endurance for Steel Doors, Frames and Frame Anchors

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "ANSI A250.4 Test Procedure and Acceptance Criteria for Physical Endurance for Steel Doors, Frames and Frame Anchors"

Copied!
23
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

ANSI A250.4

Test Procedure and

Acceptance Criteria for

Physical Endurance for

Steel Doors, Frames and

(2)

Learning Session Description

• This training aid focuses on the revisions to ANSI A250.4-2011 and both the content and intent of this performance standard. • The focus is on commercial hollow metal doors, frames and their

applicable hardware and how ANSI A250.4 can be used by the design professional in both the selection and specification of commercial door openings.

(3)

Learning Objectives:

This session will provide the following learning:

• Provide an overview and history of ANSI A250.4 • Changes in 2011 revision and updates

– ANSI canvas revision process – Reaffirmation of standard

– Minor changes, content not changed • Outline the purpose of A250.4

– Why developed – Methods of testing

(4)

Discussion Items: • History

• Recent Changes

• Overview and Purpose • Test Method

(5)

Discussion Items: • History

• Recent Changes

- Overview and Purpose - Test Method

(6)

History

• 1980 - First adopted as and SDI Standard

– First attempt to replicate on-site door usage in operable test environment

• Door • Frame • Hardware

– Provided manufacturers with uniform method of evaluation • Life cycle testing of components and assembly

• 1994 – Adopted as ANSI A156.4

(7)

2011 Revisions: Minor Content Changes

• ANSI requires a ballot on standards every 5 years

• Hardware reinforcements were removed from test scope

– Test focus on the door, frame, anchors, and components – Title prior to revision:

Test Procedure and Acceptance Criteria for – Physical Endurance for Steel Doors, Frames, Frame Anchors and Hardware Reinforcings

– Title after revision:

Test Procedure and Acceptance Criteria for – Physical Endurance for Steel Doors, Frames and Frame Anchors • ANSI A250.4's terminology was revised:

(8)

Discussion Items:

• History

• Recent Changes

Overview and Purpose

(9)

Overview

ANSI A250.4 Purpose:

– Establishes a performance test method for commercial Hollow Metal openings

ANSI Standards Committee A250:

– Secretariat is the Steel Door Institute

– Recently approved the revision of ANSI/SDI A250.4, Test Procedure and Acceptance Criteria for Physical Endurance for Steel Doors, Frames and Frame Anchors

(10)

Overview - Purpose

• Why developed

– Provided manufacturers with uniform method of evaluation • Life cycle testing of components and assembly

• Methods of testing

– Two (2) part test procedure:

• Cycle test at designated level of cycles • Twist tests at designated cycle points – Operable test:

• Door cycles with commercial hinges, exit device and closer • Replicates on site use and abuse

(11)

Overview – Performance Test

Purpose of the standard:

– ANSI/SDI A250.4 establishes a performance test method for commercial hollow metal openings

– Replicates field operating conditions

• Operable hardware

• Door swings opens 60°± 5°

• Cycles 15 cycles / minute • Twist tests at predefined

intervals

(12)

Overview – Performance Test

Test Apparatus:

– Test fixture with pneumatic cylinder to cycle the door at designated rates

(13)

Overview – Performance Test

Test Apparatus:

– Test fixture with pneumatic cylinder to cycle the door at designated rates Two part test:

– Cycle Test – Twist Test Cycle Test Twist Test

(14)

Overview – Performance Test

Operable Opening: – Exit device – Door closer – Hinges

(15)

Overview – Performance Test

Test specimen: – Door:

• 3070 nominal size door • Production doors shall

be used

• Detailed description of the construction

(16)

Overview – Performance Test

ANSI A250.4 Page #2

Test specimen: – Frame: • Production frame • Detailed construction description • KD or Welded – Anchors: • Snap-in or welded

(17)

Discussion Items:

- History

- Recent Changes

- Overview and Purpose

(18)

Swing Test

• Purpose:

– Full-sized operable door to simulate actual applications – Evaluate door panel

degradation • Cycles:

– Level “A” = 1,000,000 cycles – Level “B” = 500,000 cycles – Level “C” = 250,000 cycles

(19)

Swing Test Report

• Report filled out by technician witnessing test

• Test can be witnessed and certified by test lab

Page #7 Page #8

Page #7 – Door Evaluation Page #8 – Frame Evaluation

(20)

Twist Test

• Purpose:

– Simulate abuse

– Evaluate door panel degradation • Conducted at:

– 25,000 cycle intervals for the first – 100,000 cycles and at 50,000 cycle

intervals for the balance of the test. • Load pressure:

– Loads in 30 lb. increments – Max 300 lb. load applied

(21)

Twist Test Report

Plotted curve drawn through the points shall graphically demonstrate the reaction of the door to increasing and decreasing pressures at different cycle intervals.

(22)

Summary:

– Recent revisions are minor in nature

– Performance test to evaluate door, frame and anchor construction – Performance levels add rational for:

• Selection • Usage

• Specification

(23)

References

Related documents

Portage Home Visitors, Occupational Therapists, Physiotherapists, and Speech and Language Therapists can make home visits to support and advise you on appropriate programmes to

LDAP Sserver Directory Access Interface Authentication Assurance Service User Manager Assertion Storage User Database Credible third-party Authentication Center Security

In this paper, joint use of frequency-domain equalization and antenna diversity combining was considered for improving the DS-CDMA signal transmission performance in a

To evaluate genetic resistance of parental lines actively used in maize breeding programs to major foliar diseases, 152 maize inbred lines were tested against northern corn leaf

Nonetheless, due to the ill- posed nature of the inverse problem, linear mixing and inaccurate source localization complicate MEG/EEG connectivity analyses both by distorting phase

The study reveals that the monotonous and stressful nature of work, disruption in social and family life and lack of career growth may be held major factors for low sustainability

Table 2: Geographic Concentration, by Non Localized Industries According to eγ 3-digit SIC Industry eγ Number of Rank (Portuguese CAE-Rev2) Plants eγ bγ A bγ EG 160- Tobacco 0.000 2

To determine which of the liver damage indices better ex- plains changes in methadone metabolism (Table 2), we compared them in terms of explanatory power (R 2 ) for