www.nrpa.no
CT dose
reconstruction
based on RIS
and PACS data
Hilde M. Olerud. Dr.ing. Head of section, NRPA
1. Amanuensis II UiO, Inst. of Physics
Hiii, if you
understand the
technology you may
understand the CT
dosimetry also...
Pst, Urvin, what can
I say about CT
dosimetry?
www.nrpa.no
What I would like to talk about….
•
Principle of CT
– Registration – Reconstruction – Imaging
•
Energy deposit in patient during CT scanning
•
Practical dose quantities monitored in i CT
– CTDIvol and DLP
– ICRU’s new concepts of CT dosimetry
•
Calculation of
organ doses
and effective dose
– MC simulations, Conversion factors, Available software
•
Norwegian CT dose surveys
– Dose data available for adults and pediatric patients
•
What do we find in RIS and what in PACS?
www.nrpa.no
Computed Tomography (CT)
GIVES TRANSVERSIAL RECONSTRUCTED SLICES
•
REGISTRATION
The X-ray tube is rotating around the patient who is irradiated with a fan beam. The detectors registrates the transmitted radiation through different body parts
•
RECONSTRUCTION
By interpolation and filtered backprojection the computer reconstructs transversal
slices of the volume of interest and enhance small differences in density between tissues and organs
•
IMAGE VIEWING
The pixels are given shades of grey or
colours depending of X-ray density. Contrast may be manipulated by window settings
(WL and WW). The pixel information may be transferred to workstation for processing.
X-ray tube X -ra y b eam in x y p la ne Det ecto rs in xy plan e Continues scan
www.nrpa.no
CT coordinate system
x
y
Fan beam
z
Narrow beam –
Cone beam
MDCT
NxT
www.nrpa.no
Measurment of CT dose index,
CTDI
100
IEC 32 cm phantom, 10 cm chamber and electrometer
∫
+ −×
=
mm 50 mm 50 a 100K
(
z
)
dz
T
N
1
CTDI
CTDI
D
max NxTz
Longitudinal directionwww.nrpa.no
Current dosimetry in CT
ICRU REPORT 74 www.msct.eu
( )
z
dz
K
T
N
1
C
CTDI
a K∫
a +∞ ∞ −×
=
=
p , 100 , PMMA , K c , 100 , PMMA , K w , PMMA , K wC
3
2
C
3
1
C
CTDI
=
=
⋅
+
⋅
T
N
d
factor
pitch
CT
×
Δ
=
factor
pitch
CT
/
C
factor
pitch
CT
/
CTDI
CTDI
vol=
w=
K,PMMA,wL
CTDI
DLP
=
vol×
CTDI
100, cwww.nrpa.no
The “practical dose parameters”
recorded
• For radiography and fluoroscopy the practical dose parameter is the dose area product, DAP,
• for mammography it is the calculated “mean glandular dose”, MGD,
• while for CT it is the weighted and pitch corrected CTDIvol and the dose length product, DLP
• ALL these parameters are recorded as part of DICOM
Radiography and fluoroscopy Mammography CT
DAP MGD Dair CTDIw CTDIvol DLP ESD
Effective dose, ICRP 1990
•
Various organs and tissue are exposed
differently during an X-ray examination
•
Various organs and tissues have different
sensitivity to radiation
•
Think of a dose, if given to the whole body,
would result in the same stochastic risk, as if
you exposed a part of the body for a higher
dose
•
This calculated dose is called ”effective
dose”, and is given in units of sievert (Sv)
•
Effective dose is the sum of doses given to
selected ICRP organs, weighted accounting
for the organ sensitivity to radiation
E =
Σ
w
T⋅
H
TORGAN/TISSUE
w
TGonades 0.20
Red bone marrow
Colon
Lung tissue
Stomack
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
Bladder
Breasts
Liver
Oesophagus
Thyroid
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
Skin
Bone
0.01
0.01
Rest 0.05
Σ
w
T= 1.00
ICRP revised 2007
w
Tis tissue weighting factors
www.nrpa.no
The basis for organ dose assessments in CT
• A number of radiation protection organisations around the world have
performed Monte Carlo simulations for a large number of types of x-ray
examination under a range of exposure conditions and published organ and effective dose conversion coefficients to be integrated in software
”Freeware” Dose calculators for CT :
• Impact http://www.impactscan.org/index.htm
• CT-Expo http://www.mh-hannover.de/kliniken/radiologie/str_04.html
Voxel phantom series B created at the University of Florida.
Oak Ridge National Laboratory Cristy and Eckerman, 1987
www.nrpa.no
CT dose calculator
ADULTS
http://www.impactscan.org/index.htm
Input parameters
•
Scanner model
•
kV
•
Head/body FOV
•
Scan region
•
mA og rotation time
•
”collimation”
•
Pitch
The calculation of
•
Organ doses
•
CTDI
w– CTDI
vol•
DLP –
effective dose
Scanner Model: Acquisition Parameters:
Manufacturer: mA 300 mA
Scanner: Rotation time 0.8 s
kV: mAs / Rotation 240 mAs
Scan Region: Collimation mm
Data Set MCSET05 Slice Width 5 mm
Current Data MCSET05 Pitch 1.5
Scan range Rel. CTDI 1.02 at selected collimatio
Start Position 0 cm CTDI (air) 19.1 mGy/100mAs
End Position 43 cm CTDI (soft tissue) 20.4 mGy/100mAs
Patient Sex: f nCTDIw 5.3 mGy/100mAs
Organ wT HT wT.HT Remainder Organs HT
Gonads 0.2 9.364 1.873 Adrenals 8.461
Bone Marrow (red) 0.12 4.371 0.525 Brain 0.001
Colon 0.12 9.059 1.087 Upper Large Intestine 10.797
Lung 0.12 1.135 0.136 Small Intestine 10.086
Stomach 0.12 11.190 1.343 Kidney 12.712
Bladder 0.05 11.239 0.562 Pancreas 8.234
Breast 0.05 0.317 0.016 Spleen 10.530
Liver 0.05 10.240 0.512 Thymus 0.249
Oesophagus (Thymus) 0.05 0.249 0.012 Uterus 9.722
Thyroid 0.05 0.021 0.001 Muscle 5.240
Skin 0.01 4.950 0.049
Bone Surface 0.01 6.532 0.065 CTDIw (mGy) 12.6
Kidneys 0.025 12.712 0.318 CDTIv ol (mGy) 8.4
Remainder 2 0.025 5.191 0.130 DLP (mGy.cm) 361.2
Total Effective Dose (mSv) 6.629
CT Bekken/abdomen ved Lab 2, Indre enfold, HF SØR v/ kvalitetsradiograf Berta Lohne
ImPACT CT Patient Dosimetry Calculator
version 0.99m, 1/07/2002
Scan Description / Comments
Update Data Set
GE
GE HiLight, HiSpeed, CT/i (No SmB) 120
Body
Look up
Get From Phantom Diagram
5
www.nrpa.no
Effective dose for 7 typical CT exams in 90ties
RESULTs BASEDT ON 49 LABORATORIES
Olerud, HM. Radiat Prot Dosim 1997;71(2):123-133
•
NRPB -
SR250 phantom and conversion factors
– Scanner model, kV, mAs, slice thickness, increment, CTDI, scan length
•
CTDOSE software for calculations of effektive dose
•
New scanners:
http://www.impactscan.org
CT examination E (mSv) Country mean E (mSv) median E (mSv) 3. quartile Max/Min value Head/brain 2,0 1,8 2,7 8,0 Thorax 11,5 10,0 15,5 19,5 Abdomen 12,8 9,9 17,2 13,3 Lumbal spine 4,5 4,4 5,2 10,5 Liver 11,9 11,1 16,4 8,7 Kidneys 9,9 10,1 14,4 19,7 Pelvis 9,8 8,3 11,8 17,2
www.nrpa.no
Variation in CT doses in Norway
• www.nrpa.no publikasjoner/Strålevernrapport 11:1995: "Computer tomografi ved norske sykehus. Undersøkelsesteknikk og stråledose til pasient”
www.nrpa.no
Explanations for dose variation
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
•
The difference in scanner technology (manufacturer, model)
•
Examination protocol (scan volume, use of contrast, mAs)
•
Clinical question
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4 Effektiv dose (mSv) Antall scannereWith and without contrast With contrast
Without contrast
CT head/brain: suspected tumour/metastase
Effective dose 2.4 mSv (mean)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4 Effektiv dose (mSv) Antall scannere
With and without contrast With contrast
Without contrast
CT head/brain : hemorrhage versus thromboses/emboli
www.nrpa.no
Exposure of the lense of the eyes
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
• May be considerable when repeating
CT examinations of the head/brain for follow-up reasons/chronic ill patients
– Ex. Children with hydrocephalus treated with shunt
• Dependent of the tilt of the gantry
Lense doses (mGy)
Parallel
with
scull basis
axiale slices
Mean
Min
Max
3.9
1.1
9.4
80.9
39.1
108.6
ICRP threshold values :
•
Measurable changes in
lenses 0.5 -
2 Gy
www.nrpa.no
P
ati
en
t ID
age
/s
ex
C
lini
ca
l q
u
es
tion
E
xa
m
in
at
ion
C
o
d
es
S
ca
n
p
ar
am
ete
rs
D
o
se
p
ar
am
ete
rs
Im
age
s
RiS and PACS a chest of treasures
•
Frequencies of examinations
•
Dosedata as defined by
DICOM/IEC/IHE profil
•
Gathered from RIS or
DICOM/PACS to electronic
patient journal or central
databases for statistics
www.nrpa.no
IEC/DICOM standards for dose reporting in CT
• When ordering a new examination
the agreed dose quantities are
popping up on the operators consol
• CTDIvol
A measure of the average dose deposit in a slice
– when the whole organ is covered by the primary scan volume, it is also a measure of the organ dose
• DLP
A measure of the total energy imparted during the whole examination
• Desired that the dose parameters
www.nrpa.no
The work in IEC, DICOM and IHE ... – 09/06/2011 17/15
Dose reporting evolution
•
To overcome
limitations of DICOM header
, a work was
undertaken by DICOM in collaboration with IEC to register,
separately from the images
, dosimetric and related data.
•
This work led to the creation in 2004 of a DSR (Dose Structured
Report) to capture and collect all information dedicated to
dosimetry.
•
The DSR contains a set of individual Irradiation Event (IE) which
contains the relevant technical and dosimetric details for one single
continuous irradiation. Whether or not the images are stored, IE
and DSR are registered.
•
Two Dose SR exist:
• Supplement 94: Diagnostic X-Ray Radiation Dose Reporting (2005)
www.nrpa.no
The new IHE profile was tested in 2009
Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise http://www.ihe.net/
X-ray equip.
•
GE
•
Philips
•
Siemens
•
Toshiba
•
xx
•
yy
RiS/PACS
•
Agfa
•
Fuji
•
Kodak
•
Sectra
•
Siemens
•
aa
•
bb
IHE
profile
www.nrpa.no
The work in IEC, DICOM and IHE ... – 09/06/2011 19/15
IHE REM Profile status (info from IRSN, France)
During Connectathons IHE provides a detailed implementation and testing process to promote the adoption of standards-based interoperability by vendors and users of healthcare information systems.
▌
In 2011 the REM profile was tested at two
Connectathons: IHE North America Connectathon 2011 - January 17-21, Chicago (USA)
IHE-Europe Connectathon 2011 - April 11-15, Pisa (Italy).
www.nrpa.no
Dose reconstruction based on PACS data
•
PerMos: Automatic calculation of organ doses based on PACS data
– Data from the DICOM-header is transferred, no images
– Pseudonymization, no patient information leave the hospital
– Work on all PACS-systems from all manufacturers
•
Developed by Research Centre Henry Tudor, Luxembourg,
www.tudor.lu
•
Based on new software NCICT: beta version available SEP 2011
www.nrpa.no
User can change the scan range by dragging upper and lower lines.
Organ/effective dose are presented here and automatically copied to clipboard. User can “paste”into Excel spreadsheet or somewhere else.
Predefined scan range for different age phantoms are provided based on common scan protocol. Will be extended.
Scan start/end slice can be entered (e.g. 1 means 1 cm from the top of the head). Scan range bars will be automatically changed.
ED60 and ED103 are effective doses based on ICRP 60 and 103, respectively. “Splitting rule” in ICRP 60 was applied.
User can select phantoms from newborn to adult male/female. Reference height and weight are provided but not editable.
User can select from four major manufacturers. The list of scanner models are changed depending on manufacturer.
User can select from head and body filters.
CTDIw normalized to 100 mAs will be displayed from
Choonsik Lee, PhD
National Cancer Institute, NIH, DHHS Rockville MD 20852
www.nrpa.no
Dose reconstruction based on RIS data
TO ALLOCATE DOSE VALUES TO CHILDREN EXAMINAED BEFORE PACS FROM RIS
• Date
• CT room/Hospital
• Patient ID, i.e. AGE/SEX
• Examination type
– hospital terminology
• NORAKO codes
• Clinical indication
• FROM PREVIOUS CT SURVEY 1993
– 49 CT rooms
• CT manufacturer/Model
• Typical scan protocol for various
examination types ADULT
– head, thorax, abdomen, liver, kidney, spine, pelvis
– 12 clinical indications
• Assumption
– adult protocols were used for pediatrics
• Use new software, NCICT, to calculate
organ doses
– for the protocols used at site in the 90thies
– for all age groups/both sexes
When coho rt is c reated from RIS the ca lculated dose s can be allo cated indivi dual ch ildren base d on 1 993 s ite info
www.nrpa.no
EPI-CT: Estimates of organ doses in pediatric CT
Cohort of children found in RIS Retrospective based on RIS
• NRPA will estimate organ
doses to children
– for CT scanners used in the 90thies
– for typical CT procedures
– for different age/sex
– based on new software, NCICT
• From the RIS cohort or
manual collected info
– the name of the hospital
– the CT scanner model
– age/sex of the child
– CT procedure
• General dose values can be
allocated to individuals
When PACS data available
• Automatic gathering of CT
scan parameters for individual patients by the program
PerMos
– From DICOM header the scanner model, scan region, FOV, kV, mA/rotation time, collimation, pitch….
– New NCICT will calculate the organ doses for individual children
• Individual dose values can be
www.nrpa.no
New knowledge and spin-off from EPI-CT
•
Organ doses in CT may
exceed 50 mGy for adults
– Even higher for children
previously
•
We are in the range
epidemiological proofs of
possible risks may be found
– the cohort has to be followed
for a long time
•
National experience in use of
new CT software and image
quality phantoms
•
Automatic gathering of data
from PACS/DICOM
– Can be used in all radiology
for QC, optimisation and dose records
www.nrpa.no
Effective dose from CT examinations 2002 –
2008
country mean values from national surveys ADULTS
CT exam Effective dose mSv
2002 Effective dose mSv 2008 Change mSv 2002-2008 Head/brain 1,8 1,5 -0,3 Neck 3,4 2,6 -0,8 Thorax 11,5 4,7 -6,8 Columna 4,3 5,6 +1,3 Abdomen 12,6 10 -2,6 Pelvis 9,3 7,3 -2
www.nrpa.no
Trends in CT doses
CT doses should increase because:
•
”Overbeaming”
•
High spatial resolution claims more dose if the noise level in
images are to be maintained
•
Larger scan volume per CT serie
•
More fast CT series to follow different contrast phases
CT doses should decrease because:
•
More sensitive detectors
•
Use of pitch>1
•
Tube current modulation/AEC
•
Focus on quality control and optimisation
– Development of new CT protocols is a multidisciplinary task
– The use of diagnostic reference levels (DRL’s)
– Regulations: authorization, inspection and audits
Technical development standardisation
QA,
www.nrpa.no
EU EPI-CT WP4 Dose reconstruction/Norway
•
RIS information alone may be used to establish estimates of the
radiation doses in cases when PACS data are not available. This would
increase the statistical power in the EPI-CT project.
•
NRPA have information of the range of CT scan parameters used
during the 90’thies in Norway for adult patients. The national survey
included 49 CT rooms, all vendors and scanner models in use at that
time were represented (GE, Siemens, Thoshiba and Phillips).
– 7 exam types, 12 indications
•
We could recalculate the paediatric organ doses using the
NCI-CT (Choonsik Lee/National Cancer Institute/Rockville MD)
software based on the range of known adult scan protocols, and
provide this information to the EPI-CT project.
•
In the 90’thies adult protocols were more commonly used also for
children, resulting in quite high organ doses. We may approximate that
adult protocols were quite generally used
•
Good estimates of organ doses may be allocated to individual children
having CT during the ninethies just based on RIS
www.nrpa.no
NCICT SEP 2011 mail
• Please go ahead with installing the software and begin the test. I appreciate your comments and help to improve this tool.Your comment on the different CT scanner is exactly what we (together) need to deal with.
• Currently, the organ dose provided from the NCICT is normalized to CTDIw of the
Siemens Sensation 16 scanner which was actually modeled. To deal with other
scanners, the NCICT is using the library of CTDIw for a total of 70 old and current CT scanners as you can see when you install the NCICT.
• Looks like the scanner list you sent me is pretty much covered by the list I'm using.
• However, I definitely need to extend the library to cover more scanners. I plan to visit Dr. Paul Shrimpton at HPA UK to discuss this issue during the visit to Newcastle University to work on UK CT study with Mark Pearce. I also work with US FDA to extend the library.
• Do you have any resources to help? I need CTDIw for head (16 cm) and body (32 cm) phantoms for more CT scanners.
Choonsik Lee, PhD
National Cancer Institute, NIH, DHHS Rockville MD 20852
www.nrpa.no
EU EPI-CT WP7 Optimisation/Norway
• The new ICRU phantom presented by John M. Boone Chairman, ICRU committee on CT Image Quality and Patient Dosimetry
• Evaluates image quality (CNR, MTF) and dose (z-sensitivity profile) in the same phantom, ends the out of date concept of CTDI100
• In collaboration with the partner in
Luxembourg/Henry Tudor
– Have this phantom manufactured by PTW
– Develop software that
automatically evaluates image quality and dose
• Scan it with current paediatric CT
protocols for the range of current CT scanner models
– Survey as input to EPI-CT WP7
• Compare results with results from
survey of clinical images using the same protocols
• Input to further development of
the phantom for paediatric use
www.nrpa.no
http://www.rti.se/products/barracuda/
CT-SD16 CT Slice Detector
• The CT-SD16 is based on solid-state technology, it is robust and it fits into existing standard phantoms used for CTDI measurements.
• The CT-SD16 detectors are very thin (width 250
μm). Thanks to their small width, the detectors are completely irradiated when the table is moving and the CT scans over the probe.
• The dose is measured in every point of the X-ray beam and the total dose profile is acquired regardless of how wide the beam is.
• There is no limitation of the beam width due to limited length of the probe. This makes it possible to
measure without the limitation of traditional probes:
– CTDI100
– CTDIvol
– CT dose profile
– Scan speed
www.nrpa.no
100mm active length
CT –ion chamber
0,3 mm active lenght
CT-SD16 solid state detector
www.nrpa.no
CT-slice probe collecting Dose
profile based on manuel trig
(Timed mode)
Only one measurement in the central hole
is needed to collect data when using the
CT-slice probe for routine QA.
CtDIw (mGy) DLP (mGycm) Print CtDIw (mGy) DLP (mGycm) Print
CT-SD16 Program and application
(RTI Electronics AB, Sweden)www.nrpa.no
Size specific dose
estimates
•
Provide a method to
estimate CTDI
volfor
individual patients based on
– Their circumference/ AP-lat
dimensions
– Conversion factors from
measurements either related to 16cm or 32 cm phantoms
– How to apply this report for
measurements with the new ICRU 30cm phantom…?
– For EPI-CT individual
www.nrpa.no
Useful
links
• ImPACT Group, St. George’s Hospital, London: http://www.impactscan.org/
• European Comission. Europrean guidlines on quality criteria for computed
tomography. EUR 16262 EN (1999)
http://www.drs.dk/guidelines/ct/quality/index.htm
The 2004 CT Quality Criteria
http://www.msct.eu/CT_Quality_Criteria.htm
• EU DOSE DATAMED prosjektene (2003 – 2007) & DDM2 (2011 – 2013)
www.ddmed.eu
• IAEA/IDOS symposium 8. – 12. Nov 2010 Vienna
http://www-pub.iaea.org/mtcd/meetings/announcements.asp?confid=38093
John M. Boone, chair ICRU committe on CT dosimetry and image quality
• http://www.nrpa.no
• http://www.uio.no/studier/emner/matnat/fys/FYS4760/index.xml