Efficacy of the KISS Programme:
Self Control of Drug Consumption in
Severely Dependent Drug Addicts:
A Randomised Controlled Trial
ICMI Conference 2012, Venice
Gabi Becker (managing director, Integrative Drogenhilfe Ffm., IDH) Prof. Dr. Hans Volker Happel, (University of Applied Sciences, Ffm.) Prof. Dr. Joachim Körkel, (University of Applied Sciences, Nürnberg) Prof. Dr. Gero Lipsmeier, (University of Applied Sciences, Ffm.)
© 2012 Gabi Becker, Volker Happel, Joachim Körkel & Gero Lipsmeier
KISS – Implementation and Evaluation in Frankfurt
Overview
IDH Frankfurt
KISS Programme
Research Questions
Study Design
Results
Integrative Drogenhilfe
•
founded in 1986 in the City of Frankfurt/Germany
•
runs 8 low treshold institutions
Overnight accomodation for homeless drug addicts,
flatsharing community,
crisis centers,
safe injection rooms,
handicraft-workshops,
vocational training facilities
shelter and counselling for sex workers
Consultancy and guidance for (HIV*+) children and their
drug using parents
•
150 employees (social workers, craftsmen,
psychologists, administrators, manager)
•
5.000 different clients per year
IDH-Institutions with KISS groups („Study centers“)
Eastside
(Shelter, contact center, safe injection room,
working programs, methadone maintenance
treatment, psychosocial care)
Niddastraße
(Safe injection room in the red-light district)
© Körkel, Becker, Happel & Lipsmeier (2008)
FriedA
(Contact center with
methadone maintenance
© 2012 Gabi Becker, Volker Happel, Joachim Körkel & Gero Lipsmeier
KISS – Implementation and Evaluation in Frankfurt
Starting point 2005
All 150 employees were trained in Motivational Interviewing
(social workers 7 days, the rest 4 days)
We had 2 goals, when we started to have MI as a
foundation of our work:
•
Increase of competence and satisfaction of our employees
•
Increase of the willingness for change in our clients
The main question became: How to raise the motivation for
change of the consumption behaviour of our clients
Consequence: Search for suitable programmes
Result: KISS Programme
Definition: Self Controlled Consumption
Self-controlled drug intake = a person is following a
predetermined consumption plan set up by himself/ herself.
This means to plan ahead for one week:
•
the number of abstinent days
•
the maximum number of standard consumption units (SCU)
on a consumption day
•
the maximum number of SCU in the whole week
•
and to set other constraints (such as when, where, and with
whom to consume)
© 2012 Gabi Becker, Volker Happel, Joachim Körkel & Gero Lipsmeier
KISS – Implementation and Evaluation in Frankfurt
Characteristics of „KISS“
created by Prof. Dr. Joachim Körkel
•
Group programme (max. 12 participants), also
available as individual programme, 1-2 skilled
KISS-trainers
•
Goal: Reducing the use of legal / illegal drugs.
Abstinence is of course also possible!
•
In the strict sense of MI: Client decides, which
drugs to reduce and how quick it will be changed.
•
Structure of behavioral therapy (BSCT), ca. 3,5
months:
Ö
1-2 preliminary talks
Ö
12 structured weekly
modules (à 2¼ hrs.)
Ö
Contents
Content of the 12 KISS Modules
1. Basic knowledge of drugs
2. Pros & cons for change
3. Consumption balance
4. Initial definition of individual goals
5. Strategies for reaching the goal (control)
6. Dealing with risky situations
7. Handling episodes
8. Leisure activities
9. Identifying strains
10. Dealing with strains
11. Social competences („Say-no“)
Crack
1 Stein = 10 €3
14
1
1
1
1
4
6
2
3
12
2
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
1
0
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
0
4
2
1
Consumption Diary (Example)
Consumption
Consumption
Diary
Diary
(
(
Example
Example
)
)
© Körkel, Becker, Happel & Lipsmeier (2008)
1
Research Questions for the Evaluation
•
Is KISS attractive for socially excluded,
heavily addicted drug users, do they
cooperate and stick to the programme?
•
Does KISS reduce substance consumption?
•
Is KISS effective in reducing addictions?
•
Does KISS have positive effects on other
important areas in the life of addicts?
•
How do participants evaluate the programme
© 2012 Gabi Becker, Volker Happel, Joachim Körkel & Gero Lipsmeier
KISS – Implementation and Evaluation in Frankfurt
Study Design
•
Randomized clinical trial with participants randomly
assigned to
either
a KISS Group starting within the
near future
or
a waiting-list control group
•
Computer assisted personal interviews at 3 to 4
occasions:
a) Pre-Assessment
b) Post-Assessment (KISS-clients after completion of
programme and waiting-list clients after 3 months
c)
Waiting-list clients after their completion of
programme
d) Follow-Up (6 months after last interview)
•
Extensive urine sample analysis at each interview
occasion and half way through the programme
Participants of the study
230 people showed interest in KISS
123 came to an interview, 113 took part in the study
81 men, 32 women
2,5 : 1
Average age: 38.9 years
89 % detoxification, 60 % abstinence oriented therapy,
82% counselling
72 % methadone maintenance treatment
90% living on social welfare, 70% unemployed
48 % homeless
70 % single
© 2012 Gabi Becker, Volker Happel, Joachim Körkel & Gero Lipsmeier
KISS – Implementation and Evaluation in Frankfurt
Consumption Information 1
Standard Consumption Units (SCU)
alcohol:
0,5 l beer
1 SCU
0,50 €
cannabis:
1 joint, 0,2 g
1 SCU
1,00 €
heroin:
1 pack, 0,2 g
1 SCU 10,00 €
crack:
1 stone, 0,2 g
1 SCU 10,00 €
cocaine:
0,2 g powder
1 SCU 20,00 €
© 2012 Gabi Becker, Volker Happel, Joachim Körkel & Gero Lipsmeier
© 2012 Gabi Becker, Volker Happel, Joachim Körkel & Gero Lipsmeier
KISS – Implementation and Evaluation in Frankfurt
Consumption Information 2
Client Nr. 64
monthly consumption at t1
alcohol
336 SCU
168 €
cannabis
28 SCU
28 €
heroin
245 SCU
2.450 €
crack
84 SCU
840 €
cocaine
2 SCU
40 €
benzos.
56 SCU
84 €
total costs
3.610 €
Consumption Information 3
Number of substances used at t1 (n=113)
1 substance
13 persons
2 substances
28 persons
3 substances
28 persons
4 substances
19 persons
5 substances
16 persons
6 substances
5 persons
Plus: 111
persons are smokers!
81 persons take methadone
Ø 4,5 substances
© 2012 Gabi Becker, Volker Happel, Joachim Körkel & Gero Lipsmeier
KISS – Implementation and Evaluation in Frankfurt
Consumption Information 4
Substance number of
Average per
maximum
users
users
amount
Alcohol
45
81,66 SCU
448 SCU
Cannabis
63
80,20 SCU
515 SCU
Heroin
67
91,15 SCU
560 SCU
Crack
70
57,55 SCU
525 SCU
Cocaine
28
15,25 SCU
100 SCU
Benzos
66
59,00 SCU
300 SCU
96 66 63 60 60 46 29 39 58 56 48 27 21 18
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Cigarettes Crack Heroin Benzod. Cannabis Alcohol Cocaine Consumption (last 28 days)
Desire for Changes
Consumption Frequency and Desire for Change
at the Beginning of the Study all Participants, N = 113)
© 2012 Gabi Becker, Volker Happel, Joachim Körkel & Gero Lipsmeier
KISS – Implementation and Evaluation in Frankfurt
Number of KISS-Sessions attended (KISS-ITT, N= 59)
0 5 10 15 Frequency 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 KISS-Sessions attended
TPP-Subsample
Pre-Post-Reductions in all consumption –
relevant alteration indicators
(%)
-30
-19
-31
-36
-6
-3
-10
-3
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
Overall
consumption
days with
consumption
number of
diagnosis
money spent
for drugs
KISS-ITT
Warte-KG
© 2012 Gabi Becker, Volker Happel, Joachim Körkel & Gero Lipsmeier
KISS – Implementation and Evaluation in Frankfurt
Reduction of the total amount of
substances consumed
233 156 284 162 141 298 245 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300Pre Post Follow up
to ta l a m ount of s u bs ta nc e s c ons um e d i n w e ig ht e d S C U (N u tts I n d e x) KISS ITT (n=44)
ITT mit Kata (n=37) WG (n=37)
Reduction of the total amount of money
spent for drugs
522 310 681 437 321 728 703 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750
Pre Post Follow up
m o ne y s p e n t f o r dr ugs pe r m o nt h i n Eur o KISS ITT (n=44) ITT mit Kata (n=37) WG (n=34)
© 2012 Gabi Becker, Volker Happel, Joachim Körkel & Gero Lipsmeier
KISS – Implementation and Evaluation in Frankfurt
Reduction of the number of additional
diagnoses
1,46 0,73 1 1,43 0,97 1,45 1,63 0,7 0,8 0,9 1 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,6 1,7Pre Post Follow up
N u m b e r of a d di ti ona l di a g nos is KISS ITT (n=49) ITT mit Kata (n=37) WG (n=35)
consumption-free days
19,1 18,1 15,7 19,4 16,2 16,2 15,8 15 15,5 16 16,5 17 17,5 18 18,5 19 19,5 20Pre Post Follow up
co n s u m p ti o n fr e e d ays p e r m o n th KISS ITT (n=45) ITT mit Kata (n=37) WG (n=35)
© 2012 Gabi Becker, Volker Happel, Joachim Körkel & Gero Lipsmeier
KISS – Implementation and Evaluation in Frankfurt
How strongly are you currently stressed by….
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
t1
t2
t1
t2
Waiting-list
KISS-TPP
not at
all
Very
strong
(at Post-assesement, TPP-analysis)
5 5,7 5 5,5 4,9 5,1 4,5 5,2 5,2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Satisfaction w ith K ISS-Progr am overall Satisfaction with KI SS-trainer KISS helped with redu ctio n … the KISS users guide? … the definition of weekly goals? ... the c onsumption behaviour graph? … it, to d o KISS in group s? … the weekly recurrence? … the KISS-consumption d iar y ?Rating
from
0 (very
low) to 6 (very
h
igh / a lot)
© 2012 Gabi Becker, Volker Happel, Joachim Körkel & Gero Lipsmeier
KISS – Implementation and Evaluation in Frankfurt
Conclusions
•
Many drug addicts can be motivated to reduce their drug
consumption – even seemingly „hopeless“ cases.
•
The motivation for change is enormous (2,77 substances on
average).
•
KISS seems to work: Significant reductions in consumption
level and DSM-IV addiction diagnoses.
•
Clients (and trainers) are very satisfied with the different
aspects of KISS.
•
KISS opens the door to abstinence for some clients.
•
KISS seems to be a suitable additional treatment option for
many different settings (e.g. MMT, shelters, safe injection
rooms …)
Thank you very much for your attention!
Contact:
Gabi Becker, IDH Frankfurt, Germany
g.becker@idh-frankfurt.de
www.idh-frankfurt.de
www.kiss-heidelberg.de
© 2012 Gabi Becker, Volker Happel, Joachim Körkel & Gero Lipsmeier
© 2012 Gabi Becker, Volker Happel, Joachim Körkel & Gero Lipsmeier
KISS – Implementation and Evaluation in Frankfurt
N = 46
Waiting-list
control group
with Post-Assesement
N = 113
Cl. with complete entrance diagnosticsN = 55 (ITT)
KISS-ITT
-Cl. with
Post-Assesement
N = 20
Joined 0-3
KISS-sessions
N = 54
Waiting-list
control group
N = 59
KISS
-group
N = 23
‚KISS‘ WL
N = 39
Joined min 4
KISS-sessions
N = 37 (TPP)
KISS-TPP
-Cl. with
Post-Assesement
N = 30
WL with
KISS
t4
t2
t3
t1
N = 8
‚Pure‘ WL
N = 46
KISS-ITT
N = 30
KISS-TPP
5´ Welcoming and overview
10´
Flashlight
45´
7- Day review
& exchanges
15´ Break
50´ Working
on new topic
10´ Final &
feedback
e.g.. ,
balancing,
appointing new weekly goals,
choosing the strategies,
© 2012 Gabi Becker, Volker Happel, Joachim Körkel & Gero Lipsmeier
KISS – Implementation and Evaluation in Frankfurt
Pre-Post-Reductions in all consumption –
relevant alteration indicators
(%)
Changes in Addiction I:
Number of DSM-IV Addiction Diagnosis at
t1
(TPP, N = 83)
22
22
11
5
11
43
28
13
4
41
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
1
2
3
4
KISS-TPP (N = 37)
Waiting-list (N = 46)
Mean KISS-TPP:
1.38
Mean Waiting-list:
1.57
© 2012 Gabi Becker, Volker Happel, Joachim Körkel & Gero Lipsmeier
KISS – Implementation and Evaluation in Frankfurt
Changes in Addiction II:
Number of DSM-IV Addiction Diagnosis at
t2
(TPP, N = 83)
46
11
5
0
13
41
30
13
2
38
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
1
2
3
4
KISS-TPP (N = 37)
Waiting-list (N = 46)
Mean KISS-TPP:
0.76
Mean Waiting-list:
1.50
© 2012 Gabi Becker, Volker Happel, Joachim Körkel & Gero Lipsmeier