• No results found

National Information Assurance Partnership. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme. Validation Report

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "National Information Assurance Partnership. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme. Validation Report"

Copied!
22
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

Figure

Table 2. Differences Between TOE Models
Table 3. TOE Security Assurance Requirements  Assurance Component ID  Assurance Component Name

References

Related documents

The presumption of fact is still in the trial stage in the judicial practice, the law has not yet clear and detailed provisions, dual absence and legal theory, lead to many

The Target of Evaluation (TOE) identified in this Validation Report has been evaluated at a NIAP approved Common Criteria Testing Laboratory using the Common Methodology for

Topic: Bank Loans Learning Obj.: LG 3 Learning Outcome: F-24 Question Status: Revised AACSB Tag: Analytic Skills.. 44) A ________ is an agreement between a commercial bank

By addressing the two research questions (RQ1: What are the motives that drive sport consumers in Hanoi, Da Nang, and Saigon to support their local football team? and RQ2: How

[5] Common Criteria, Evaluation and Validation Scheme for Information Technology Security, Guidance to Validators of IT Security Evaluations, Scheme Publication #3, Version

This report documents the assessment of the National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) validation team of the evaluation of the Protection Profile for Software Full Disk

The TOE, Arbor Networks Peakflow X version 3.1.4, is a network integrity system (NIS) consisting of collector and controller appliances.. The collectors capture network

Evaluation team action during the course of the ST evaluation ensured that the ST contained a description of the environment in terms of threats, assumptions and policies; a