• No results found

Coupled simulation of shock-wave/turbulent boundary-layer interaction over a flexible panel

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Coupled simulation of shock-wave/turbulent boundary-layer interaction over a flexible panel"

Copied!
15
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

Loading

Figure

Figure 1: Schematic of the oblique shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction with mean separation [15].
Figure 2: (a) Schematic of the experimental model. The baseplate consists of a fixed part (red) and an optional flexible insert (green)
Figure 3: (a) Incompressible skin friction evolution. (– ●–) Blasius; (–▾–) Kàrmàn-Schoenherr; (—) Smits; ( — ) LES;
Figure 5: Top: Instantaneous temperature distribution T /T ∞ in x −y mid-plane. Bottom: Time- and spanwise-averaged temperature distribution ⟨T⟩/T ∞
+7

References

Related documents

Paper presented at the 99 th annual convention of the National Communication Association, Intercultural and International Communication Division, Washington, DC.. Different

South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, Spring 2013 Communication Studies (Area: Qualitative Methods).. Advisor: Karla

To add art, first make sure the art space for the front cover is selected to place front cover art, the spine to place the spine art, or the back cover space to place the back

We believe that the dropping technique is a useful experimental approach because it represents differences among species in adherence capability much more sensitively

Method: Two southern elephant seals were fitted with a head‑mounted time depth recorder (TDR) (recording depth at 1 Hz) and an accelerometer (recording 3 axes of acceleration at

Gariglio, “High prevalence of autoantibodies against the nuclear high mobility group (HMG) protein SSRP1 in sera from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, but not other

Економіко-географічні райони України Економіко-географічна характеристика (за типовим планом: економіко- географічне положення та його господарська оцінка; природні

Maxillary canines are the 2nd most commonly impacted teeth by Johnston WD have shown that about two-thirds of maxillary canines are impacted on palatal side, one third