• No results found

Improving Chunking Accuracy on Croatian Texts by Morphosyntactic Tagging

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Improving Chunking Accuracy on Croatian Texts by Morphosyntactic Tagging"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Improving Chunking Accuracy on Croatian Texts by Morphosyntactic Tagging

Kristina Vu

č

kovi

ć

*, Željko Agi

ć

*, Marko Tadi

ć

**

*Department of Information Sciences **Department of Linguistics

Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb Ivana Lučića 3, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia

{kvuckovi, zeljko.agic, marko.tadic}@ffzg.hr

Abstract

In this paper, we present the results of an experiment with utilizing a stochastic morphosyntactic tagger as a pre-processing module of a rule-based chunker and partial parser for Croatian in order to raise its overall chunking and partial parsing accuracy on Croatian texts. In order to conduct the experiment, we have manually chunked and partially parsed 459 sentences from the Croatia Weekly 100 kw newspaper sub-corpus taken from the Croatian National Corpus, that were previously also morphosyntactically disambiguated and lemmatized. Due to the lack of resources of this type, these sentences were designated as a temporary chunking and partial parsing gold standard for Croatian. We have then evaluated the chunker and partial parser in three different scenarios: (1) chunking previously morphosyntactically untagged text, (2) chunking text that was tagged using the stochastic morphosyntactic tagger for Croatian and (3) chunking manually tagged text. The obtained F1-scores for the three scenarios were, respectively, 0.875 (P: 0.826, R: 0.930), 0.900 (P: 0.866, R: 0.937) and 0.930 (P: 0.912, R: 0.949). The paper provides the description of language resources and tools used in the experiment, its setup and discussion of results and perspectives for future work.

1.

Introduction

Implementing procedures for automatic processing of morphology and syntax are seen today as one of the most important milestones in enabling advanced language technologies for any language (cf. Krauwer, 2003). This is mainly due to the fact that:

• language processing modules such as current state-of-the-art morphosyntactic taggers or partial and deep parsers (cf. ACLWiki, 2010) make possible the fast creation of large quantities of annotated language resources without imposing high demands on manual annotators and

• these modules are very efficient pre-processing tools in large-scale natural language processing systems as their demands on processing time and space are small when compared to more complex systems.

These facts are especially true for languages with less complex morphology and syntax, such as English, where tasks like morphosyntactic tagging and parsing are today considered as more or less resolved issues. However, morphologically and syntactically complex languages – such as Slavic languages or, more specifically, Croatian language – still pose a challenge, in terms of both accuracy and overall system efficiency, even in these basic tasks (cf. Agić et al., 2009; Buchholz and Marsi, 2006; Nivre et al., 2007). In addition, pipelining natural language processing tools has shown to be a well-investigated and straight-forward way to increase the performance in many basic tasks such as morphosyntactic tagging and parsing.

With an overall goal of enabling advanced language technologies for Croatian language (cf. Dalbelo Bašić et al., 2007) we have developed, among other modules, a stochastic morphosyntactic tagger (cf. Agić et al., 2008) and a rule-based chunker and partial parser (Vučković et

al., 2008; Vučković, 2009). In this paper, we present results of an experiment in the attempt to improve the performance of the chunker by using a morphosyntactic tagger as a pre-processing module for the chunker.

Development and improvement of parsers brought a belief that the role of morphosyntactic taggers as pre-processing tools is weakening (cf. Charniak et al., 1996; Charniak, 1997) and that modern parsers do not really benefit from pre-tagging the input, or at least not substantially. However, in our opinion, this claim may be shown to be valid mainly for languages with less complex morphology and syntax and not for morphologically complex languages. From this specific perspective, our experiment was also targeted to show whether such a claim is applicable to Croatian and whether pre-tagging of the input text provide better chunking results when compared to chunking previously untagged text. Other related work might include approaches such as (Pla et al., 2000), (Nasr and Volanschi, 2006) and (Domínguez and Infante-Lopez, 2008).

The following chapter of the paper presents the setup of the experiment or, namely, the language resources and tools we used in conducting it. Further, we discuss the obtained results and conclude by stating an outline for our future work plans.

2.

The experiment

In this chapter, we provide a brief description of language resources and tools used in the experiment, along with the experiment framework.

2.1

Morphosyntactic tagger

(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)

Lecture Notes In Artificial Intelligence 5221. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Advances in Natural Language Processing (ANLP).

Gothenburg, Sweden, pp. 126 - 137.

Erjavec, T. (2004). MULTEXT-East Version 3: Multilingual Morphosyntactic Specifications, Lexicons and Corpora. Proceedings of the Fourth International

Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation.

ELRA, Paris-Lisbon 2004, pp. 1535-1538.

Halácsy, P., Kornai, A., Oravecz, C. (2007). HunPos - an open source trigram tagger. Proceedings of the 45th

Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Companion Volume, Proceedings of the

Demo and Poster Sessions. Association for

Computational Linguistics, Prague, Czech Republic, 2007, pp. 209-212.

Krauwer, S. (2003), The Basic Language Resource Kit (BLARK) as the First Milestone for the Language Resources Roadmap. Proceedings of SPECOM 2003. Moscow, 2003.

Nasr, A., Volanschi, A. (2006). Integrating a POS Tagger and a Chunker Implemented as Weighted Finite State Machines. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4002 –

Finite-State Methods in Natural Language Processing.

Springer, pp. 167-178.

Nivre, J. (2006). Inductive Dependency Parsing. Text,

Speech and Language Technology, Vol. 34. Springer,

Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

Nivre, J., Hall, J., Kübler, S., McDonald, R., Nilsson, J., Riedel, S., Yuret, D. (2007). The CoNLL 2007 Shared Task on Dependency Parsing. Proceedings of the

CoNLL Shared Task of EMNLP-CoNLL 2007. Prague,

Czech Republic, pp. 915-932.

Pla, F., Molina, A., Prieto, N. (2000). Improving Chunking by Means of Lexical-Contextual Information in Statistical Language Models. Annual Meeting of the

ACL. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Learning Language in Logic and the 4th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning - Volume 7,

pp. 148-150.

Silberztein, M. (2004). NooJ: an Object-Oriented Approach. INTEX pour la Linguistique et le Traitement

Automatique des Langues. Muller, C., Royauté, J.,

Silberztein, M. (eds), Cahiers de la MSH Ledoux. Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté, pp. 359-369. Silberztein, M. (2005). NooJ’s Dictionaries. Proceedings

of the 2nd Language and Technology Conference.

Poznan University, 2005.

Silberztein, M. (2006). NooJ Manual. Available at URL http://www.nooj4nlp.net/NooJ%20Manual.pdf. Tadić, M. (2000). Building the Croatian-English Parallel

Corpus. Proceedings of the Second International

Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation.

ELRA, Paris-Athens 2000, pp. 523-530.

Tadić, M. (2002). Building the Croatian National Corpus.

Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. ELRA, Paris-Las

Palmas 2002, Vol. II, pp. 441-446.

Tadić, M., Fulgosi, S. (2003). Building the Croatian Morphological Lexicon. Proceedings of the EACL2003

Workshop on Morphological Processing of Slavic Languages. Budapest, ACL, 2003. pp. 41-46.

Tadić, M. (2005). The Croatian Lemmatization Server.

Southern Journal of Linguistics 29:1/2, pp. 206-217.

Tadić, M. (2006). Developing the Croatian National Corpus and Beyond. Contributions to the Science of

Text and Language. Word Length Studies and Related Issues. Kluwer, Dordrecht 2006, pp. 295-300.

Tadić M. (2007). Building the Croatian Dependency Treebank: the initial stages. Suvremena lingvistika 63, pp. 85-92.

Vučković, K., Tadić, M., Dovedan, Z. (2008). Rule Based Chunker for Croatian. Proceedings of the 6th

International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. Marrakech-Paris, ELRA, 2008.

Figure

Figure 1  Examples of phrases
Table 3 Distribution of cases on NP and PP chunks
Table 6 Chunking accuracy with case assignment

References

Related documents

This paper explains a method for arranging dialogues into chunks, and also shows how discourse chunking can be used to improve performance for a dialogue act tagger that uses

Since N EGRA is the newspaper corpus on which the default version of T N T was trained, its statistical comparison with M ED should elucidate the tagger’s performance on medical

LNAI 3651 Chunking Using Conditional Random Fields in Korean Texts R Dale et al (Eds ) IJCNLP 2005, LNAI 3651, pp 155 ? 164, 2005 ? Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005 Chunking

This is not the case for all the following (arbiter type) combination methods, a fact which we have recently exploited in bootstrapping a word class tagger for a new

Earlier editions of the VarDial workshop featured the DSL shared task, and the ADI shared tasks, which focused on discriminating between similar languages and language varieties in

As neither annotated corpora nor parallel corpora are electronically avail- able for Rusyn, we propose to com- bine existing resources from the etymo- logically close Slavic