• No results found

Advanced Planning in Supply Chains - Illustrating the Concepts Using an SAP APO Case Study

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Advanced Planning in Supply Chains - Illustrating the Concepts Using an SAP APO Case Study"

Copied!
21
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Advanced Planning in Supply Chains -

Illustrating the Concepts Using an SAP APO Case Study

2 Hierarchical Planning and the Supply Chain Planning Matrix

(2)

Contents

2 Hierarchical Planning and the Supply Chain Planning Matrix

2.1 Principles of Hierarchical Planning 2.2 Rolling Schedules

2.3 The Supply Chain Planning Matrix 2.4 Planning Tasks in the Frutado Case

(3)

Contents

2 Hierarchical Planning and the Supply Chain Planning Matrix

2.1 Principles of Hierarchical Planning 2.2 Rolling Schedules

2.3 The Supply Chain Planning Matrix 2.4 Planning Tasks in the Frutado Case

(4)

2.1 Principles of Hierarchical Planning

• Def. Hierarchical planning (HP) system:

It comprises a set of decision units (DU) where each DU

• is assigned to a specific planning level,

• has a single superior DU at an upper planning level which controls or limits its potential decisions by imposing instructions

(except for the DU at the top). (see fig 2.1)

• 5 principles of HP:

• Decomposition and hierarchical structure

• Coordination

• Aggregation

(5)

2.1 Principles of Hierarchical Planning

Hierarchical Planning System

Advanced Planning in Supply Chains 5

(6)

2.1 Principles of Hierarchical Planning

Decomposition and hierarchical structure

• A monolithic model of all operational planning tasks of a company

would have several drawbacks, namely,

• vast amount of up-to-date data required at the top,

• detailed planning throughout the planning interval of the top level,

• little acceptance of the model´s results by bottom level managers …

• Way out: Decomposition such that each organizational unit possesses its own planning model

Coordination

• Aim: Align decisions of linked DU (at least achieve overall feasibility)

(7)

2.1 Principles of Hierarchical Planning

Aggregation

• Aim: Reduce complexity

• Entities: Resource, products, time (examples?)

Model building, anticipation, and disaggregation

• 1 planning model for each DU (mostly mathematical models)

• Anticipation:

• Takes into account the main characteristics of the subordinate DUs,

• ranges from simple to perfect anticipation

• Disaggregation: Instructions from the superior DU have to be broken down to the level of detail required at the subordinated DU

(e.g. seasonal stock for a product groupseasonal st. for each end product)

Model solving

• Solvability of models within given time limits

(e.g. by manual planning, simple or meta heuristics, LP …)

(8)

Contents

2 Hierarchical Planning and the Supply Chain Planning Matrix

2.1 Principles of Hierarchical Planning 2.2 Rolling Schedules

2.3 The Supply Chain Planning Matrix 2.4 Planning Tasks in the Frutado Case

(9)

2.2 Rolling Schedules

• Def. Rolling schedules (RS):

Assuming a planning interval consisting of several periods, RS result if re-planning takes place whenever the re-planning interval (usually 1 period) has passed (see Fig. 2.2).

• Advantages of RS:

• Since only decisions in the re-planning interval are implemented, future decisions may be revised (if advantageous in light of latest information)

• A means to cope with uncertainty even when using deterministic models

• Drawbacks of RS:

• Re-planning takes time and causes cost

• Re-planning may result in system nervousness

(to counteract, a frozen horizon is introduced)

(10)

2.2 Rolling Schedules

(11)

2.2 Rolling Schedules

• Note:

• RS are also used in HP.

• RS are trivial, if each planning level uses the same period length (see Fig. 2.3 – however, this is unusual in industrial practice).

• RS become tricky, if the period length of a subordinate planning

level is smaller (then ´some´ periods at the subordinate level may be

without instructions, see Fig. 2.4) . Way out?

(12)

2.2 Rolling Schedules

(13)

2.2 Rolling Schedules

Hierarchical Planning Levels & Intervals (2)

Advanced Planning in Supply Chains 13

Figure 2.4: Shorter re-planning intervals on lower hierarchical planning levels, variable planning intervals

(14)

Contents

2 Hierarchical Planning and the Supply Chain Planning Matrix

2.1 Principles of Hierarchical Planning 2.2 Rolling Schedules

2.3 The Supply Chain Planning Matrix 2.4 Planning Tasks in the Frutado Case

(15)

2.3 The Supply Chain Planning Matrix

The Supply Chain Planning Matrix

Advanced Planning in Supply Chains 15

(16)

2.3 The Supply Chain Planning Matrix

Top Level

• Planning interval of several years

• Company-wide strategic planning

Mid-Level

• Planning interval of 6 – 12 months

• Quantities in “time buckets” (months or weeks), no single operations considered (e.g. vehicle trips)

• Coordination of all SC processes by Master Planning

Bottom Level

• Planning interval of some days or a few weeks

(17)

2.3 The Supply Chain Planning Matrix

Decoupling point in a supply chain

• Separates upstream processes (forecast-driven)

from downstream processes (fulfillment of known customer orders)

Typical decoupling points

• Before the first production stage (Make-to-Order, MTO)

• Before the final assembly (Assemble-to-Order, ATO)

• At the finished product stock (Make-to-Stock, MTS)

(18)

Contents

2 Hierarchical Planning and the Supply Chain Planning Matrix

2.1 Principles of Hierarchical Planning 2.2 Rolling Schedules

2.3 The Supply Chain Planning Matrix 2.4 Planning Tasks in the Frutado Case

(19)

2.4 Planning Tasks in the Frutado Case

Forecasting

• Weekly for each DC region, for at least 6 months (seasonality!)

• Daily for short-term production scheduling and distribution

Master Planning

• Allocation of weekly production quantities to plants and FL’s

• Distribution to the DC’s

• Anticipating bottlenecks by combination of building up stocks, overtime and cross-shipping

Production Scheduling

• Locally in each plant

• Lot-sizing and scheduling for each FL

Distribution

• Shipping of finished products to the DC’s

• Deliveries of the customer orders, vehicle routing

(20)

• Fleischmann, B.; Meyr, H.; Wagner, M. (2008) Advanced planning, in: H. Stadtler; C. Kilger (Eds.) Supply Chain Management and Advanced

Planning, Springer, Berlin et al., 4th ed., 81–109

• Gebhard, M. (2009) Hierarchische Produktionsplanung bei Unsicherheit, Gabler, Wiesbaden

• Hax, A. C.; Meal, H. C. (1975) Hierarchical integration of production

planning and scheduling, Logistics: TIMS Studies in Management

Sciences, vol. 1, North–Holland, Amsterdam, 53–69

• Rohde, J. (2004) Hierarchical supply chain planning using artificial

neural networks to anticipate base-level outcomes, OR Spectrum, vol.

26, no. 4, 471–492

• Schneeweiss, C. (2003) Distributed Decision Making, Springer, Berlin,

2 Hierarchical Planning and the Supply Chain

Planning Matrix - Bibliography

(21)

• Timm, T. (2008) Ein Verfahren zur hierarchischen Struktur-,

Dimensions- und Materialbedarfsplanung von Fertigungssystemen,

Universität Paderborn,Paderborn

• Volling, T. (2008) Auftragsbezogene Planung bei variantenreicher

Serienproduktion, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig

• Zäpfel, G.; Mitter, J. (2010) Hierarchische Planung für industrielle Logistikdienstleister, Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, vol. 80, no. 12, 1277–1304

Advanced Planning in Supply Chains 21

2 Hierarchical Planning and the Supply Chain

Planning Matrix - Bibliography

References

Related documents

technology becoming embedded in all facets of a business, perhaps the students at JCC should be given choices as to which path they take, application programming, mac

Purpose To evaluate the utility of percentage of free serum PSA (%fPSA) as a predictor of adverse rebiopsy findings, treatment change and radical prostatectomy (RP) findings in

• Provides ”wrapped” look when used with top grille and top kits • Side panel kits include panels for both sides.

In the second part of the thesis, a methanol plant is simulated using Aspen Plus, where chemical grade methanol is synthesised from exhaust carbon dioxide and

Effects of cognate status and language of therapy during intensive semantic naming treatment in a case of severe non-fluent bilingual aphasia.. Treatment-induced

Peer assisted learning (PAL) has the potential to increase the value of hours spent on clinical placements by providing students with supplementary observation and

There are substantial research studies available detailing the importance and effects of multicultural counselling competence (for example, Constantine (2002),