Value Stream Mapping
1
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Value Stream Mapping:
Theory & Cases
Value Stream Mapping
2
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Lean Enterprise Research Centre
Cardiff Business School
Formed in 1994 by Prof Dan Jones &
Prof Peter Hines
–
30 staff now
“Researching, applying,
& communicating
lean thinking”
“Researching, applying,
& communicating
lean thinking”
Value Stream Mapping
3
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Overview
Value Stream Mapping Background
Some of the Value Stream Maps
Value Stream Mapping
4
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Value Stream Mapping
Value Stream Mapping
5
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
My Involvement with VSM
1993-1997
Supply Chain Development Programme
* Process Activity Mapping
* Brown Paper Mapping
1997
Paper: The Seven Value Stream Mapping Tools
* Codified Mapping Approach
1997
First Rother & Shook publication
* Big Picture Mapping
1999
Corus-Forge-Volvo Transmission VSM work
2000
Going Lean publication
* see
www.leanenterprise.org.uk
2002
Lean Profit Potential
Value Stream Mapping
6
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
What Have I Learned?
Don’t be a ‘happy mapper’
Start by understanding what you are trying to
achieve
–
Can anyone tell me the 4 Lean Principles?
–
And what about a link to Strategy?
Involve the recipients in the mapping
–
Don’t ‘do mapping’ to people
Don’t Just Map Internally
Don’t Just Map Order Fulfilment
No one map will do the job
7
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Relation of Value, Cost &
Waste
Customer
Perceived
Value
Waste/Cost
x
1
2
Creating Lean Solutions:
1. Reduce Internal Waste
2. Develop Customer Value
Creating Lean Solutions:
1. Reduce Internal Waste
2. Develop Customer Value
Cost-Value
Equilibrium
Value Stream Mapping
8
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
PROCESS ACTIVITY MAPPING SUPPLY CHAIN RESPONSE MATRIX BIG PICTURE MAPPING FOUR FIELDS MAPPING DEMAND AMPLIF- ICATION MAPPING DECISION POINT ANALYSIS PHYSICAL STRUCTURE VOLUME VALUE Over Production
L M L M M
WaitingH H L H M M
TransportationH H L
Inappropriate ProcessingH M
M L
Unnecessary InventoryM H M L H M L
Unnecessary MotionH L M
DefectsL H
H
We need to find the waste first
Value Stream Mapping
9
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Awareness Stage: 1980-1990
Theme
Shop Floor Practice
Focus
JIT Techniques, Tools
Business Process
Shop Floor Manufacturing
Industry Sector
Automotive Assembly
Gaps
Outside Shop Floor
Outside Single Firm
Narrow Focus
Value Stream Mapping
10
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Quality Stage: 1990-mid 1990s
Theme
Best Practice Benchmarking
Focus
Cost, Quality, Reengineer
Business Process
Manufacturing & Mat. Mgt
Industry Sector
Automotive Ass./ Supply
Gaps
Human Element
Supply Chain
Value Stream Mapping
11
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Quality, Cost, Delivery Stage:
Mid 1990s-2000
Theme
Lean Enterprise
Focus
Cost / Process QCD
Business Process
Order Fulfilment:
Val. Str.
Industry Sector
(Repetitive) Manufacture
Gaps
(Other) Process Integrate
Relationships
Value Stream Mapping
12
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Value System: 2000+
Theme
System Capability
Focus
Value & Cost
Business Process
Integrated Processes
Industry Sector
All Manufacturing/Service
Gaps
Low Volume Manufacture
Strategic Integration
Lean Network Systems
Demand
Variability
Volume
Adapted from: Fisher, 1997
Runner
Repeater
Stranger
Low Variability/
Complexity
Kanban
Medium
Variety/Complexity
Make To Order
High
Variety/Complexity
Avoid? Stock?
Value Stream Mapping
14
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Inventory Profile of the
UK Automotive Supply Chain
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Ra w Material Bo ug ht-o ut Parts In-h
ouse built Parts
Pre-Assembly WIP Assembly WIP F inished Compone nts In bo un d T ra nsit On-site P art (VM) Ve hicle Production W IP Loa ding & Despatch Ou tb ou nd T ransit Marketplace Customer
Days of I
nvent
ory
Max
Average
Min
First Tier Suppliers VehicleManufacturers Distribution& Retail
Outbound Logistics Inbound
Logistics
Value Stream Mapping
15
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Some of the Maps
Back Office Area
Sales Staff Desks
New Car Showroom
Coffee
Area
Service Desks
Parts
Store
Service Workshop
Valeting Area
In-Servicing Vehicle Storage
Customer Car Park
Used Car Storage Area
New Car Storage Area
Customer
Delivering
Car
Technician
& Valeter
Activity
Customer
Collecting
Car
Spaghetti Diagram
Big Picture Map: Current State
C/T = 5 sec Uptime = 100% 450 sec av Batch = 10 Variety = 3 Operation 1 Red Blocks 510 sec5 blocks 4 blocks 4 blocks 2 blocks
1 piece per time
Variety = 3
30 pieces per 7.5 min 1 every 15 secLean Ltd.
Operation 2 C/T = 7 sec Uptime = 100% 450 sec av Batch = 7 Variety = 3 C/T = 7 sec Uptime = 100% 450 sec av Batch = 9 Variety = 3 Operation 3 C/T = 5 sec Uptime = 100% 450 sec av Batch = 1 Variety = 3 Operation 4Batches
Numerous Variety
Random SupplyBlocks R Us
I I I I I15s Order
30 round
Forecast
Planning
Operator
Manager’s Schedule
30 sec 510 sec 5 sec 60 secProdn Lead Time = 735 sec VA Time = 24 sec 75 sec 7 sec 7 sec 60 sec 5 sec
Big Picture Map: Future State
Red
Blocks
White
Blocks
Batch
1 piece per time
Variety = 3
TAKT = 15 secLean Ltd.
Standard Number
Supply to PullBlocks R Us
C/T = 5 sec Uptime = 100% 300 sec av Batch = 1 Variety = 1 Operation 1 Operation 2 C/T = 5 sec Uptime = 100% 300 sec av Batch = 1 Variety = 1 C/T = 5 sec Uptime = 100% 300 sec av Batch = 1 Variety = 1 Operation 3 C/T = 5 sec Uptime = 100% 300 sec av Batch = 1 Variety = 3 Operation 4R
Y
G
60 sec 20 sec 5 sec 20 secProdn Lead Time = 160 sec VA Time = 20 sec 20 sec 5 sec 5 sec 20 sec 5 sec
1
1
1
1
1
Daily Order
30 round
Forecast
10s Order
Planning
Forecast
Order
Changeover Waste Elimination Milk Round Cycle TimeValue Stream Mapping
19
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Some of the Maps
Value Stream Mapping
20
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Process Activity Map
Value Stream Mapping
21
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Identifies where quality problems exist in
the supply chain
3 types of quality defect
–
Product defects - defects in goods that are not caught
by in-line or end-of-line inspection and are therefore
passed on to customers
–
Service defects - problems given to a customer not
directly related to the product but to the level of service
–
Internal scrap - defects produced in a company that
have been caught by in-line or end-of-line inspection
Value Stream Mapping
22
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Quality Filter Chart
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
800000
900000
1000000
Blanking
Pressing
Assembly
Paint
Despatch
Parts Pe
r Millio
n
Product Defects
Service Defects
Scrap
Value Stream Mapping
23
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Product Variety Funnel
PIECE PART CUT (SIZING) PACKED PRODUCT (FGS) SEW PRODUCT PIECE PARTS CUT DYE KNIT YARN GREY FABRIC COLOURED FABRIC (TUBE) VARIANT FLEXIBILITY LEAD TIME PACK SIZE COLOUR GAUGE YARN GAUGE KNIT
RS Components Course
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Value Analysis Time Profile
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Time (hours) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
cum cost total cum cost val add
c o s t r e d u c tio n o p p o r tu n ity H o riz o n ta l p la te a u s h o w o p p o rtu n itie s fo r le a d -tim e re d u c tio n re c e iv e g o o d s in P re s s o p e ra tio n s P o s t-A s s e m b ly d e c a n tin g , in s p e c tin g e tc A s s e m b ly o p e ra tio n s W IP s to re s to re g o o d s in
RS Components Course
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Value Analysis Time Profile
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Time (hours) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
cum cost total cum cost val add
£ 2 .2 9 T o ta l
£ 2 .0 1 V A
3 3 7 h r s
*
*
*
*
*
*
RS Components Course
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Value Analysis Time Profile
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Time (hours) 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
cum cost total cum cost val add
£ 2 .0 3 T o ta l
£ 1 .9 6 V A
2 2 5 h r s
Value Stream Mapping
27
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Four Field Map:
Current State
Customer Service Team
Finance Charge C/W Non Charge
C/W
Filing Reception Senior
Finance C/W
Standards & Comments
Finance Phase 2A
Time Reso-urce Monica’s Table Finance Legal/Means Phase 2 ChargeCharge ChargeNon
Tag No No Yes Yes Pull Need File Skills Skills Get File Yes No Process
Post ProcessPost Post Bucket Post Bucket 4 Senior Case Work’ Yes Yes No No Post Bucket 2 - 7.5 hrs 2 hrs 1 wk -34 wks 1 hr 3 – 9 hrs 1 wk 13 to 248 days
Total
Variance depends on Case Worker, variable location of sort
Backlog calculated using oldest date (worst case scenario) Not FIFO
Reception Tag & Filing All file requests dealt with at the same time
Assume 1 person processing post
Unable to quantify referral time
2 hrs 1 hr 0.25 hr 0.1 –2 hrs 0.5 hr 3:20 to 5:15 hrs
Value Stream Mapping
28
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Four Fields Map:
Future State
Charge Non Charge Filing Senior
Case Worker
Standards & Comments
Finance Phase 2A
Time Reso-urce Charge with files Non Charge With files Pull File Skills Skills Referral Yes Yes No No 10 – 15 mins Read Letter Read Letter Need File Need File Yes Yes NoGet File Get File
Process Process Process
Post Bucket Post Bucket Post Bucket No 5 mins 2 hrs if rqrd 10 mins – 2 hrs 5 mins 30 mins to 4 hrs 25 mins 10 – 15 mins 5 mins 5 mins 10 mins – 2 hrs 5 mins 30 mins to 2 hrs 30 mins
Training needed / cultural issues to be addressed
Charge post is sent to C/W with File (no need to pull file at later stage)
Referral process: Matter would always be passed back to C/W after the Senior C/W has considered it, either with a work solution or guidance notes. This box to be emptied once daily (allocation rota)
Non Charge post, where file needed, files to be supplied by filing 4 times daily (2 am, 2 pm) from a tray in each pod. This activity is a priority
Calculated per piece of post Post split into 1st, 2nd, Dx
Value Stream Mapping
29
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Cases and Examples
Value Stream Mapping
30
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
The Research Model
Strategic Level
Operational Level
Business Strategy
Formation and
Policy Deployment
Customer
Understanding
Process Activity
Understanding
Process Costing
Understanding
Business Strategy
Validation and
Action Planning
Value Stream Mapping
31
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Critical Success Factors
Continue to grow markets share in the 3 channels
Recruitment, development and retention of skilled &
motivated workforce
External influenced innovation
Developing the right balance between the 3 channels
Close existing & new customer relationships
Keep the franchise
Long term focus & profitability
Value Stream Mapping
32
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Key Business Targets
Vision
KPIs
Unit
Now Year 1
Year 2
Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Gross Profit/New Car
%
2.0%
2.3%
2.6%
2.9%
3.2%
3.5%
Gross Profit/Used Car
%
7.0%
7.6%
8.2%
8.8%
9.4%
10.0%
Finance Penetration New Cars %
23.0%
23.0%
23.0%
23.0%
23.0%
23.0%
Finance Penetration Used Cars %
16.0%
17.8%
19.6%
21.4%
23.2%
25.0%
Admin Expenses
%
0.9%
1.0%
1.1%
1.0%
0.9%
0.9%
Market Share: Region vs Nation
%
6.8/6.8
7.0/7.0
7.3/7.3 7.5/7.5 7.8/7.8
8.0/8.0
Retention New: First Service
%
80%
80%
80%
80%
80%
80%
Retention New: 3 years
%
30%
36%
42%
48%
54%
60%
Retention Used: First Service
%
25%
26%
27%
28%
29%
30%
Return on Total Turnover
%
1.4%
1.9%
2.4%
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
Volumes: New Cars
#
550
580
610
640
670
700
Volumes: Used Cars
#
270
296
322
348
374
400
Service Parts Absorption
%
60%
68%
76%
84%
92%
100%
Stock Turn: Used Cars
#
8
8
8
8
8
8
Stock Turn: Parts
#
7.9
8
8
8
8
8
OCE: New Cars
%
39.5%
41.0%
42.5%
44.0%
45.5%
47.0%
OCE: Used Cars
%
38.4%
45.6%
52.8%
60.0%
67.2%
74.5%
OCE: Service
%
51.1%
55.2%
59.3%
63.4%
67.4%
71.5%
Value Stream Mapping
33
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
New Car Value Attributes Importance vs Satisfaction
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 Bran d Prod uct Cha racteristi cs Pric e Pay men t Terms Order/De liver y Tim e Dealer R eput ation Staf f at th e Dealer Dealer F acilities Afte r Sales Serv ice Importance Satisfaction
Value Stream Mapping
34
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
The Service Process
Process Activity Mapping Example
FLOW (O/T/I/D/D')
ACTIVITY (FVA/VA/SA
/W)
AREA DIST MTS TIME MIN PEOPLE
Customer comes through the door
Customer arrives to Service desk and sits T SA Showroom 20 0.25 1
Customer waits D W' Showroom 0 2 1
Identify the customer I SA Showroom 0 0.5 2
Control if job card information are correct I W Showroom 0 2 2
Customer signs O SA Showroom 0 0.1 2
Collect customer's keys O SA Showroom 0 0.1 2
Arrangement to return car I SA Showroom 0 1 2
Write arrangement on job card O SA Showroom 0 0.25 1
Find a place for job card D W Showroom 3 0.5 1
Waits for workshop controller D W' Showroom 0 120 0
. .
. .
Ian checks job cards I W Showroom 0 0.5 1
Ian informs Darren who is going to do the service O SA Showroom 0 0.1 2
Darren up-dates Time Sheet O W Showroom 0 0.1 1
Ian hands out work between technicians T SA Showroom/Workshop 20 2 2
TOTALS 43 129.4 20
Value Stream Mapping
35
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
The Service Process
Big Picture Map
Lead Time
3,6 days
Lead Time
3,6 days
Routine Regular service Understanding Requirements & Booking 90% phone call 10%personal visit Service at Dealer Concerns :break down , warranty Car Collection 90% customer brings the car 10% car collected at home/work 75% 25% Prepare Service Job Cards 5 min - the day before service Investigation & Paperwork Large Repair Small Repair Done immediatly 5% 95% Hot orders Check parts & Pre -picking 3,5 min 5 min 2 days later 35 cars = 1 day Mechanical Work 5 operators Valeting Service 95% 22 min 5% 1,5 h Custom .collectio n & Payment 50% customers come back laterAccountant (invoice registr .) the day after Found more repairs Call customer Work division Continue scheduling during day Final Road Test 30% 70% 3 cars
= 1 h 15% pick up fromcity centre
Quality Feed -back Ring 3-5 days later inv oic e 2 valeters Parts storage PC Replenish System 24h - Local storage center 48h -From other dealer Automatic replenishment 1/1,5 hours cur rier 25% waits at dealer 10% courtesy car
Value Stream Mapping
36
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Activities Activity cost %
Visit at Dealer & take order
??
0.0%??
0.0%??
0.0%??
0.0%??
Source car 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Car arrival, Delivery arrang. & Service Booking 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Invoice&AFRL 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
PDI - Mechanical Work&Road Testing 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Valeting 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Customer Collection 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Totals - - - - -
New Car Sales Process
VA FVA SA W
Value Stream Mapping
37
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
The Process
Costing Perspective
ASC Area
Storage Centre New CarSource & Take OrderFinalise Deal & Test DriveDealer Visit to PurchaseDecision
Sales DP - 3 Sales DP - 2 Sales DP - 1
10,081.24 4,750.40 6,577.48
Other Dealer Stock
Own Stock Factory Order Visit Other DealerThink &/or
Invoice Emission & AFRL - Trigger
VW Payment 58,746.75
71,486.00 Administration DP - 1 26,632.86 2,840.40
Car Arrival
& Delivery Check ArrangementDelivery PDI Valeting CollectionCustomer
Sales DP - 5 Sales DP - 6 Mech.Service DP - 6 Mech.Service DP - 1 Sales DP - 4
7,125.60 2,740.61 5,899.91 2,859.94 8,404.55
General
>> Sales DP General Costs >> Commission Stock Mantaining 19% 9% 13% 5% 13% 5% 15% 5% 16%
Value Stream Mapping
38
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
The Strategic Change
Programme
Value Creation
Used Car Loyalty Scheme
Service Customer Care
Service Pricing incl. Courtesy Car
Used Car Replacement Cycle
Waste Reduction
Scheduling of Service Bay incl. PDI
Scheduling of Valeting
Right First Time Lean Servicing
Infrastructure
Annualised Hours
Measurement Scheme
Skills/Competency Scheme
External
Improved Supplier New Car
OTD Cycle
Value Stream Mapping
39
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
The Profit Potential
(£ annually by end 2002)
Level 1 (Internal Waste Reduction)
£ 49.6K
Level 2 (Customer Value Added)
£ 62.5K
Level 3 (Multiplier Effects)
£ 43.2K
Annual Profit Potential by end 2004
£155.3K
Equivalent to a 105%
increase in profitability
Value Stream Mapping
40
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Cases and Examples
#2 Supply Chain:
Corus - Automotive
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Corus
Steel & Alloy British Steel DistributionAlbion Pressed Metal
Tallent Engineering
LDV
GKN Sankey
Krupp Camford
Wagon Group
LEAP: Participating Companies
First Tier Component
Producers
Steel Service
Centres
Steel
Mill
Automobile
OEM’s
Value Stream Mapping
42
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Specific Improvement Targets
Improvement Area British Steel Strip Products Steel Service Centres Metal Processing Customers
Total for the Three Tiers
1. Lead Time Reduction 40% 40% 40% 40%
2. Time to Market Reduction 30% 30% 30% 30% 3. Stock Reduction 10% 20% 20% 15% 4. Quality Improvement 50% 20% 50% 45% 5. Productivity Improvement
5% per annum 5% per annum 5% per annum 15% over 3 years 6. Increased Mutual
Business
RS Components Course
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Week number0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
Quantity Blanking plan Blanking Actual Pressing PlanDemand Amplification
RS Components Course
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
0
50
100
150
200
Tonnes
Enduser Demand Wide coil ordersBSSP Deliveries
C/T = 1 sec C/O = 20 min Uptime = 70% 27,000 secav EPE 10 Days 5 Month Forecast Lead Time = 47 to 69 days VA Time = 7262 sec (121 min) C/T = 1 sec C/O = 30 min Uptime = 70% 27,000 sec av EPE 10 Days C/T = 13 min C/O = 0 min Uptime = 85% 2 shifts 27,000 secav C/T = 1 hour C/O = Uptime = 65% 2 shifts 27,000 secav C/T = 9 min C/O = 0 min Uptime = 85% 2 Shifts 27,000 secav Tray = 14 off 2 shifts 12,000 pcs/mo Coils 3 Days
1200 Sec. 900 Sec. 1 Sec. 1 Sec. 780 Sec.
1.2 Days 2 Days
2 Days 10 Daysto 32 Days 6 Days
2 Days
I
I I I I I
Vehicle Assembler
Blanking Pressing Assembly Paint Assembly Dispatch Slit Dispatch Daily Order With Time slots 1 x hours Shipping Schedule 2 shifts
Coils
Steel Service Centre 3 Month Forecast Weekly Order Fax Revision PRODN. CONTROL Weekly Schedule by Day I I Dispatch I Pack I Pickle I Hot roll Iron & SteelMaking
C/T = 120 hrs (includes cooling)
C/T = 15 min
C/O = 10 min C/T =4min/coil C/O = 45 min Uptime = 55% 2 shifts 27,000 secav Weekly Schedule & Revisions STEEL MILL SCHEDULING Check vs
Production Plan Sales PlanCheck vs COMMERCIAL Order (3 months in advance) Promise (Negotiation) Call off weekly
or by day Revisions to Missed Deliveries Individual Schedules
3 Days1 Day 16 Days
240 Sec.
3 Days
3600 Sec. 540 Sec. 0.6 Days 0.27 Days
coi
l
tote
C/T = 1 sec C/O = 5 min Uptime = 85% 27,000 secav EPE Day Lead Time = 11.5 days VA Time = 6902 sec C/T = 1 sec C/O = 5 min Uptime = 85% 27,000 sec av EPE Day C/T = 60 min C/O = 0 min Uptime = 65% 2 Shifts 27,000 secav Tray = 14 off 2 shifts 12,000pcs/mo1200 Sec. 1 Sec. 1 Sec.
4 Hours 1 Day
1 Day
Vehicle Assembler
Blanking Pressing Dispatch Slit Dispatch Daily Order With Time slots 1 x hours OXOX 2 shifts
Coils
Steel ServiceCentre CONTROLPRODN.
Dispatch Pack
Pickle
Hot roll Iron & Steel
Making C/T = 120 hrs (includes cooling) RFT = 85% C/T = 15 min
C/O = 10 min C/T =4min/coil C/O = 5 min Uptime = 85% 2 shifts 27,000 secav STEEL MILL SCHEDULING Orders 1 Day 7 Days 1200 Sec. 1 Day 3600 Sec. 1 Day
1414
14
900 Sec.600
600
600
Forecast Transmission (Supply Chain Syvchronisation) 5 Month Forecast14
Assembly & Paint14
Batchtote
Batch Coil 600 Daily Order600
600
coi
l
Coil 600 F I F OValue Stream Mapping
47
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
LEAP Targets & Results
Area
Target
Results
Lead Time
40%
u
20-90%
u
Stock Reduction
15%
u
20-75%
u
Quality
50%
t
50 ppm
Productivity
15%
t
8-33%
t
Increased Business
30%
t
40-50%
t
Design Time
30%
u
30%
u
Value Stream Mapping
48
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Cases and Examples
#3 An Information Based Process:
Insurance Company
Value Stream Mapping
49
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
The Twelve Phases Map
1.
Planning
2.
Pre-audit
3.
Initial visit
4.
Billing
5.
Cert. production
6.
Tech. Cert. review
7.
Outsourcing
8.
Cert. completion
9.
Visit cycle
10.
Billing Amf
11.
Visit 1
12.
Strategic review
Mapped at the ‘point of activity’
Value Stream Mapping
50
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Completing the Flow
Current
State
Maps
Paper
work
flow
© S A Partners, 1993-2005Value Stream Mapping
51
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Current state map
Start
Value Stream Mapping
52
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Current state map
Finish
Value Stream Mapping
53
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Current State
4 4 14 147. Outsourcing
26 21 3 2.58. Cert. completion
55 27 6 0.59. Visit cycle
12 12 7 110. Billing AMF
15 4 15 2 31 211. Visit 1
50 10 50 2 26 912. Strategic review
57 24 49 8 201.5 42.5Total of process
30 10 8 24. Billing
40 2 32 10 15. Cert. Production & proof reading
1 3 9 1 47.5 17.5
6. Tech. cert. review
40 20 30 3
3. Initial audit
Mins
Mins
Hours
Hours
Days
Hours
Hours
Days
40 20 25 30 32. Pre-audit
1 10 21. Planning process
Maximum
Minimum
Maximum
Minimum
Resource
Time Line (calendar days)
Phases –
Value Stream Mapping
54
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
[1]
© S A Partners 2004
Phase 1 – Resource Planning
Modules for clients. Education of client. Staff training (pick up on buying signals/leads etc). Opportunity to influence ass via financial incentives etc Always done it this
way Sales target driven.
Communications/Edu cation of client. Information not right Readiness of client
Culture
Comfort/lack of trust Always done it this way Lack of trust Comfort factor Culture Investigate system capability Current systems do not allow for monitoring as per s/s Use of planning spreadsheet/correspondence
log
Obtain alternative contacts from client (education of client re: status of registration) Planning to fail
Single point of contact (1sttime)
Review format of data – sales brief and sales application checklist. Planning to fail (brief may say 6-8 months) Ownership from sales – resp/training to get it right
Information not right Validation of data
Read electronically Print of email (sales brief)
Process Process Major Wastes Opportunities Root Cause © S A Partners, 1993-2005
Value Stream Mapping
55
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005
Future State
6
3
0
9
0
Post visit support service
26
18
55
3
32
4
Total
30
13
10
3
15
3
Visits and reports
Min
Min
Hour
s
Hour
s
Hour
s
Hour
s
Days
Days
15
35
10
35
3
1
Pre-Audit visit and Reports
1
5
1
Planning
Maximum
Minimum
Maximum
Minimum
Resource
Time Line (calendar days)
Phases –
85% reduction in time
50% reduction in resources
Value Stream Mapping
56
© Professor Peter Hines, 2005