Evans Spears, Ph.D., CRC MRC Program Director
From Sloan Consortium and Managing Online Education surveys :
Enrollment- at least one online course
1.6 million in Fall 2002
5.58 million in Fall 2009
Account for 29% of enrollment in education in US
94% of universities expect online enrollment to increase in next 3 years
44% of campuses report online programs profitable
63% of survey participants agree “Online
education is critical to the long-term strategies of my institution”
Greatest threat is believed to be budget cuts, lack of key human resources, and faculty
resistance
http://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/digital_tweed/mapping_the_terrain_of_online_educ ation
Face to Face
Most common
Traditional “Butts in seats”
Commonly referred to as “Brick and Mortar”
Online
Many forms
Classroom mirroring
Correspondence
Blended
Combination of brick and mortar and distance
Common first step for universities entering into distance arena
Gaining a lot of ground with traditional programs
Lectures online
Literature Based
General Areas
Covers Multiple Facets
Two Major Groupings
Institutional Factors
Resource Allocation and Planning
Technology Infrastructure
Instructor Enthusiasm Pedagogy Comfort Student Interactions Communication Learning Styles Course Size Technology Support
Only one model
Need to adapt models to:
Program
Teaching Style
Content
Some control at the program and faculty level
Many areas determined at school or university level
These factors are very resource intensive
Key is to discover how best to operate with resources provided
Distance Education can be very expensive at the start
Low # students in beginning
High cost both financially and time/effort
MRC Program
10 students and 1 professor at start
SOAHS very supportive
Full IT Dept with TTUHSC
School IT Dept
Individual IT support for each program
Materials
Hardware (e.g., servers, computers)
Different Approaches
Usually a much more focused marketing
Must look at Target Market
Often non-traditional students
Go beyond school fairs
Viral Marketing
Can be very expensive
Can apply to both the individual students and the Program/Faculty
Program and faculty have much more control over these sets of factors
More concentration paid to these factors in this presentation
From Student Perspective
Do they feel part of the university?
Priority of Schooling?
Individuals or members of a class?
From Program/Faculty Perspective
How do address these issues?
Pedagogy
Delivery methods
Student interactions
Encourage interaction with other members of class
Enthusiasm in lectures
How lectures are delivered
Energy level
Understanding of student limits
Approach as a classroom
Set up as weekly sessions
Adapt to needs of class
New approaches to test-taking
Forced interactions
Multiple forms of delivery
Moving beyond “correspondence”
Lectures are not set to “fill” a certain amount of time
Probably the most important aspect
Most powerful way to increase student belonging
Play to strengths of students
Re-educate that discussion of material can go beyond single class experience
Striving to make online as interactive as “brick and mortar”, if not more so
Discussions are a key component
Present information in multiple formats to adapt to student learning style
Auditory
Visual
Mobility
Asynchronous and synchronous
Manageable course sizes
Discussions of topic can go on for weeks as opposed to single class period
Be aware of technology knowledge base of students
Be aware of wide breadth of ages and abilities
SOAHS provides individual IT person for each program
Support provided for both students and faculty
Distance teaching can be very different than a traditional classroom
Know your own teaching style and adapt
What can be done the same
What needs adaptation
Don’t wait to last minute
More time necessary for prep
Have to have time for conversion, posting, etc
Night before lecture planning is dangerous
Up-front work
MRC needs to have semester done before it starts
Solid planning can save time in long run
Well planned courses can be re-used multiple times
Change mindset for how courses are run
No longer a 2 hour lecture
Discussions can continue for weeks
Course is always “open”
Allows time to process material and still discuss