An Official 'Journal of the American Heart Association BRIEF REVIEWS. Stimulus-Secretion Coupling of Renin. Role of Hemodynamic and Other Factors

Loading....

Loading....

Loading....

Loading....

Loading....

Full text

(1)

Circulation Research

OCTOBER 1980 VOL. 47 NO. 4

An Official 'Journal of the American Heart Association

BRIEF REVIEWS

Stimulus-Secretion Coupling of Renin

Role of Hemodynamic and Other Factors

JOHN C.S. FRAY

IT IS generally agreed that three intrarenal recep-tors control renin secretion. The macula densa re-ceptor responds to some yet unknown function of the fluid passing the distal nephron (Thurau, 1964; Vander, 1967; Kotchen et al., 1978). The neurogenic receptor, which presumably is on the juxtaglomer-ular cell membrane, stimulates renin secretion by a /?-adrenergic mechanism and inhibits by an a mech-anism (Ganong, 1972; Vandongen et al., 1973; Cap-poni and Valloton, 1976). The vascular stretch re-ceptor, presumably the juxtaglomerular cell itself, responds to the degree of stretch of the afferent arteriole such that a decreased stretch increases renin secretion (Tobian, 1960; Fray, 1976). Since it has been demonstrated that the neurogenic recep-tor and the stretch receprecep-tor can function indepen-dently of the macula densa (Davis and Freeman, 1976), several investigators have sought to deter-mine the chemical or physical events connecting the receptors to the secretory process. If we accept the proposition that decreased stretch and jS-adre-nergic stimulation increase renin secretion, then it is natural to enquire about the hemodynamic fac-tors that affect the stretch and about the cellular mechanism by which 0 stimulation leads to in-creased secretion.

In one approach to seek answers to these enqui-ries, a mathematical formula has been developed to account for the hemodynamic factors and to point to possible mechanisms by which these factors ac-tivate the release process (Fray, 1976; Fray, 1978a). Recent reports have provided compelling evidence confirming some predictions of the formula and provided fresh clues to the stimulus-secretion cou-pling process. In another approach, it has been postulated that the cellular mechanisms controlling renin secretion are analogous to those controlling smooth muscle relaxation (Peart, 1977). This ap-proach has been particularly useful, for it has al-From the Department of Physiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, Massachusetts.

This research was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant HL23516.

lowed us to identify possible mechanisms by which /?-adrenergic and other agents may trigger the se-cretory process. Both approaches have converged on this single conclusion, that the movement of calcium ion plays a central role in the mechanisms controlling renin secretion.

However, the role the movement of calcium plays in renin secretion must be exactly opposite to the one it plays in other secretory systems, despite the fact that several workers have drawn the analogy between catecholamine secretion and renin secre-tion. Douglas and Rubin (1961) suggested that ace-tylcholine interacts with the chromaffin cell to de-polarize the cell membrane and to increase the calcium permeability of the cell; since calcium con-centration usually is higher outside the cell than inside, it enters the cell and this initiates the secre-tion process. When calcium is removed from the perfusion fluid, acetylcholine still induces depolari-zation but not catecholamine secretion. When cal-cium is added in excess of normal physiological levels, acetylcholine induces depolarization and subsequently a greater release of catecholamines (Douglas, 1968). In fact, the chromaffin cells can be depolarized directly by perfusing glands with high concentrations of potassium (56 HIM) but, again, catecholamine secretion is induced only when cal-cium is present in the perfusion fluid. This general scheme, stimulus —* membrane depolarization —» increased calcium permeability —» increased cal-cium influx and cytoplasmic calcal-cium —» increased secretion, has been defined in several contexts (Douglas, 1968; Rubin, 1970). It is understandable, then, that some workers have suggested that the stimulus-secretion coupling process for renin secre-tion may be similar to that of catecholamine release from the adrenal medulla (Morimoto et al., 1970; Michelakis, 1971; Chen and Poisner, 1976; Abe et al., 1977; Lester and Rubin, 1977; Harada and Rubin, 1978).

However, it is becoming increasingly clear that the sequence in the stimulus-secretion coupling for renin may not be parallel to that for catecholamine

(2)

486 CIRCULATION RESEARCH VOL.47, No.4, OCTOBER 1980 release. The process of renin secretion under normal

physiological conditions may be initiated by hyper-polarization of the juxtaglomerular cell membrane (instead of depolarization), and by a subsequent reduction of cytoplasmic calcium (instead of an elevation). Several lines of evidence support this hypothesis. It now seems proper to review some of the evidence concerning the manner in which he-modynamic and other factors control renin secre-tion by this process. Because the theoretical anal-ysis used to identify the hemodynamic factors is fairly new, it will be discussed briefly.

Hemodynamic Control of Renin Secretion

Tobian (1960) postulated that renin secretion is inversely related to the stretch of the afferent ar-teriole. This hypothesis has been approximated by assuming that renin secretion (RS) is inversely

proportional to the stretch (RS = k [STRETCH]"1,

where k is a constant of proportionality) (Fray, 1976). From this first approximation the following formula was derived:

RS = K l - ( r i / r )2

(ri/r)2Pi-P (1)

where K = kE/2(l - 2v)\ E and v are Young's modulus of elasticity and Poisson's ratio for the arteriole; rj and ro are the internal and external radii

of the afferent arteriole; Pi is the mean perfusion pressure, and Po is the mean extravascular or

intra-renal tissue hydrostatic pressure.

Figure 1 represents a graph of renin secretion as a function of each independent variable, and illus-trates three distinct effects of hemodynamic vari-ables on renin secretion. First, renin secretion is related inversely to renal perfusion pressure (Fig. 1A); second, renin secretion is related directly to extravascular or interstitial pressure (Fig. IB); third, renin secretion is related directly to the ratio of the radii such that when the ratio decreases (as in vasoconstriction), renin secretion is stimulated, and when it increases (as in vasodilation), renin secretion is inhibited (Fig. 1C). The above equation also indicates that renin secretion is directly pro-portional to the elastic modulus E, but this point will be discussed below. It might be of importance to note that renin secretion is not influenced by transmural pressure (Pi — Po) directly, but by a

more complex function of transmural pressure, namely (ri/ro)2 Pj - Po.

An important observation emerges when two of the variables change simultaneously. Increasing Po

stimulates renin secretion (Fig. IB), whereas in-creasing Pi inhibits secretion (Fig. 1A). However, when both variables are increased simultaneously, renin secretion may increase, decrease, or remain unchanged, depending on the magnitude of the increase in each variable. It has been shown that Po

is twice as effective as Pi for the same magnitude of change (Fray, 1976), implying that in the formula

(ri/ro)2 Pi — Po, (ri/ro)2 may be 0.5 in some

circum-stances. A similar phenomenon can be demon-strated by changing ri/ro and Pi simultaneously.

Thus the renin secretion induced by vasoconstric-tion (lowering ri/ro) can be counteracted by raising

Pi, and the secretion induced by lowering Pi can be counteracted by vasodilation (raising ri/ro). In

cer-tain circumstances, as in autoregulation, inhibitory effects of vasodilation may mask the stimulatory effect of lowering Pi to a certain extent. Thus in any study relating the effects of hemodynamic variables on renin secretion, these variables must be mea-sured carefully.

The mathematical analysis has indicated that tissue elasticity, extravascular and intravascular pressures, and afferent arteriolar radii modulate renin secretion. Some experimental evidence sup-ports this indication. Raising the modulus of the elasticity (E) of the afferent arteriole increases renin secretion. Although direct demonstration re-lating afferent arteriolar elasticity to renin secretion is difficult to obtain, indirect evidence supports the concept. For example, vasopressin reduces the elas-ticity of arteries in vitro (Monos et al., 1978) and reduces renin secretion. An intact tubular organi-zation is not required for the inhibitory action of vasopressin on renin secretion (Davis and Freeman, 1976), but an intact vascular organization may be required, since vasopressin is ineffective in kidney slices (DeVito et al., 1970). Sympathetic nerve stim-ulation also increases tissue elastic modulus (Som-lyo and Som(Som-lyo, 1968) and renin secretion. There-fore, at least one of the mechanisms whereby va-sopressin infusion and increased sympathetic nerve stimulation increase renin secretion might involve increasing the modulus of elasticity.

Intrarenal Tissue Pressure

Raising renal extravascular or tissue hydrostatic pressure increases renin secretion. Skinner et al.

(1964) have demonstrated that the direct raising of extravascular or tissue pressure by 20-40 mm Hg caused increased renin secretion that was indepen-dent of changes in renal perfusion pressure and afferent arteriolar resistance. When extravascular pressure was raised 35 mm Hg in their experiments, renin secretion increased substantially, but re-turned toward control when perfusion pressure was raised by 70 mm Hg. This suggests that the effective pressure is not a straightforward transmural pres-sure (Pi — Po), but rather /?P; — Po. If it were a

straightforward transmural pressure, then a 35 mm Hg rise in perfusion pressure would be required to abolish completely the effect of a 35 mm Hg rise in extravascular pressure. From the experiments of Skinner et al. (1964), it appears that /? might be close to 0.5 under certain circumstances. By analogy with the equation for renin secretion, we might speculate that /? might actually be (ri/ro)2, in which

case the effectiveness of renal perfusion pressure

(3)

STIMULUS-SECRETION COUPLING OF RENIN/Fray 487 I 1 I \

HEMOOTNAMIC FACTORS CONTROUMG RENM SECRETION(RS) AS PLOTTED FROM THE EQUATION: RS = K - ' (' | /' °

P, (mmHB) PjmmHg) r,/ro

FIGURE 1 Hemodynamic factors controlling renin secretion (RS) through an intrarenal stretch receptor as plotted from Equation 1. For all calculations v = 0.3 and E = l(f dynes/cm1. The point (<&) on each curve represents control

renin secretion (50 ng/min), assuming Pi = 70 mm Hg, Po = 5 mm Hg, and rjro = 0.75. From these values k was

calculated to be 2.645 X 10~3 ng-cm2-mm Hg/dynes-min. This value was calculated for animals receiving a normal

sodium chloride diet. The value is different for other diets (Fray, 1978b).

(Pi) and extravascular pressure (Po) to stimulate

renin secretion might depend very strikingly on the resistance of the afferent arteriole (Fray, 1976).

Other maneuvers may stimulate renin secretion by raising intrarenal tissue pressure. For example, ureteral occlusion and renal venous pressure ele-vation increase renal tissue pressure and renin se-cretion (Eide et al., 1977; Kaloyanides et al., 1973; Ott et al., 1971; Kishimoto et al., 1972). This rise in renin secretion can be inhibited by simultaneously raising renal perfusion pressure (Kaloyanides et al., 1973), as predicted by the theoretical analysis. The infusion of mannitol and some other diuretics is associated with a rise in intrarenal tissue pressure and renin secretion (Raeder et al., 1975; Eide et al., 1975). In addition, Tobian (1960) has suggested that the renin secretion induced by renal encapsulation may be mediated by an increase in renal tissue pressure. Thus, although direct measurements are not immediately available, the renin secretion in-duced by ureteral occlusion, mannitol and other diuretic infusion, and renal encapsulation may in-volve a rise in intrarenal tissue pressure.

Perfusion Pressure and Vascular Resistance

It is difficult to discuss the effect of renal perfu-sion pressure on renin secretion without at the same time discussing the effect of renal resistance. The formula predicts that lowering perfusion pressure

stimulates renin secretion, whereas raising pressure inhibits secretion. This has been demonstrated ex-perimentally (Fray, 1976; Davis and Freeman, 1976; Hofbauer et al., 1976). However, in most instances a reduction of renal perfusion pressure is associated with dilation of the afferent arteriole (Navar, 1978), and it is often difficult to separate the stimulatory effect of pressure reduction from the inhibitory effect of vasodilation. Nevertheless, recently it has been shown that lowering renal perfusion pressure stimulates renin secretion in the absence of vaso-dilation, although this occurred below the autoreg-ulatory range. On the other hand, vasodilation in-hibited renin secretion when renal perfusion pres-sure was kept constant (Fray, 1976). In fact, the effect of vasodilation, which is associated with low pressure-induced renin secretion, can be completely dissociated from the effect of low pressure with inhibitors of prostaglandin synthesis (Blackshear et al., 1979). Similarly, the vasodilation and renin se-cretion induced by ureteral occlusion (Eide et al., 1977) may be attributed to increased renal tissue pressure (see above).

Despite these observations, some workers have proposed that renal vasodilation itself is the stim-ulus activating the stretch receptor to secrete renin (Eide et al., 1973, 1975, 1977; Kiil, 1975). There are, however, at least four reasons why afferent arter-iolar dilation itself may not be a stimulus that

(4)

488 CIRCULATION RESEARCH VOL. 47, No. 4, OCTOBER 1980 triggers renin secretion. The first is that agents such

as papaverine, acetylcholine, bradykinin, eledoisin, and prostaglandins dilate arterioles, but only a few prostaglandins stimulate renin secretion (Davis and Freeman, 1976; Osborn et al., 1978; Gerber et al, 1979; Seymour and Zehr, 1979). In fact, the vaso-dilation induced by papaverine has a decidedly inhibitory effect on renin secretion under a variety of circumstances (Davis and Freeman, 1976).

The mechanism by which prostaglandins stimu-late renin secretion is unclear, but the fact that prostaglandins are effective, even in kidney slices (Weber et al., 1976; Whorton et al., 1977) suggests that their sole mechanism of action may not be afferent arteriolar dilation (Seymour and Zehr, 1979; Osborn et al., 1978). Ito and Tajima (1979) have suggested that prostaglandins may affect nor-epinephrine release by modifying calcium channels. If this proposition is applicable to the juxtaglomer-ular cell, it suggests that prostaglandins stimulate renin secretion either by preventing influx of cal-cium into the cell or by promoting its efflux from the cell. Furthermore, prostaglandins hyperpolarize cells in the pulmonary artery and portal vein (Ki-tamura et al., 1976), and this suggests that they also may stimulate renin secretion by hyperpolarizing the juxtaglomerular cells.

The second reason why renal vasodilation may not be a powerful stimulus for renin secretion is that in the physiological and pathophysiological instances, where the greatest increases in renin secretion have been observed, increased secretion is associated with renal vasoconstriction, not vaso-dilation (Davis and Freeman, 1976). In fact, in most of such instances, vasodilation inhibits renin secre-tion (Davis and Freeman, 1976). The third reason is that the vasodilation-induced renin secretion hy-pothesis holds that renin secretion peaks when the kidney is maximally dilated and hemodynamic stimuli are no longer effective (Kiil, 1975). It has been shown recently that, even in a maximally dilated state, hemodynamic stimuli still have a pow-erful effect in stimulating renin secretion (Fray and Karuza, in press). The fourth reason is that the increased rate of renin secretion which results from direct pharmacological constriction of the renal vas-culature provides additional evidence against the vasodilation-induced secretion hypothesis (Fray, 1976; Fray and Karuza, in press; Nolan and Reid, 1978). Taken together, these lines of evidence sup-port the concept that low perfusion pressure and renal vasoconstriction stimulate renin secretion, whereas vasodilation inhibits secretion; and though, in certain circumstances, vasodilation may be as-sociated with a rise in renin secretion, this associa-tion may not be causal.

Low perfusion pressure, which hyperpolarizes vascular smooth muscles (Anderson, 1976), and vas-oconstriction stimulate renin secretion by hyper-polarizing the juxtaglomerular cell membrane and

lowering the cytoplasmic calcium according to the current hypothesis. Two lines of evidence support this view. First, high concentrations of extracellular potassium (56 mM) which depolarize the juxtaglo-merular cell completely abolish the stimulatory ef-fects of renal hypotension and renal vasoconstric-tion (Fray, 1978a). Second, low perfusion pressure stimulates renin secretion only when calcium is present in the extracellular fluid, and it becomes less effective as calcium concentration is raised (Fray and Park, 1979). High perfusion pressure, on the other hand, inhibits renin secretion when cal-cium is present in the extracellular fluid, but stim-ulates secretion when calcium is absent (Fray and Park, 1979).

This single discovery has provided a clue for the cellular mechanism by which stretch controls the secretory process. Stretch must somehow control calcium movement across the juxtaglomerular cell. In fact, as calcium is raised in the perfusion fluid, high perfusion pressure becomes more effective in inhibiting renin secretion (Fray, in press), presum-ably by promoting a greater net influx of calcium. Verapamil, which blocks inward movement of cal-cium in other secretory cells (Eto et al., 1974; Wol-lheim et al., 1978), prevents the renin inhibitory effect of high pressure (Fray, in press). One inter-esting finding is that high concentrations of extra-cellular potassium, which depolarize the juxtaglo-merular cell membrane (Fishman, 1976), mimic high perfusion pressure in its calcium dependence and in its inhibitory effect on renal vasoconstrictor-and /?-adrenergic-induced renin secretion (Park vasoconstrictor-and Malvin, 1978; Fray, 1978a). Since verapamil and its derivative, D600, block voltage-dependent calcium permeability channels in stretch receptors and other cells (Hunt et al., 1978; Baker and Glitsch, 1975), it is likely that high perfusion pressure in-creases calcium permeability in the juxtaglomerular cell (Fray and Park, 1979). Supporting this view is the observation that changing calcium concentra-tion in the medium bathing kidney slices has no effect on renin secretion, but when the slices are depolarized with high concentrations of potassium (59 mM) then changing calcium has a dramatic effect on renin secretion (Park and Malvin, 1978). Whether the increased calcium permeability results from a direct effect of high pressure or an indirect effect linked to membrane depolarization has not been ascertained. Since renal prostaglandins have been implicated in the mechanisms by which pres-sure controls renin secretion (Berl et al., 1979; Oates et al., 1979), it is quite possible that renal prosta-glandins may play some intermediate role between changes in perfusion pressure and changes in cal-cium permeability.

Humoral Control of Renin Secretion

Several lines of evidence suggest that humoral agents which stimulate renin secretion

(5)

STIMULUS-SECRETION COUPLING OF BENIN/Fray 489

ize cell membranes and lower cytoplasmic calcium and those which inhibit secretion depolarize cell membranes and raise calcium.

Catecholamines

Catecholamines that stimulate renin secretion (Ganong, 1972; Vandongen et al., 1973; Davis and Freeman, 1976) also hyperpolarize the juxtaglomer-ular cell membrane (Fishman, 1976) and extrude calcium from the perfused kidney, and presumably the juxtaglomerular cell (Harada and Rubin, 1978). The stimulatory effect of catecholamines can be prevented by high concentrations of potassium which depolarize the juxtaglomerular cell mem-brane (Fishman, 1976; Fray, 1978a) and by lan-thanum, the potent blocker of net calcium efflux (Logan et al., 1977). Raising extracellular calcium or lowering extracellular sodium attenuates the powerful stimulatory effect of catecholamines (Fray and Park, 1979), and ouabain or potassium depri-vation completely obliterates it (Fray, in press). Since these observations are entirely consistent with the mechanism by which catecholamines lower cytoplasmic calcium in smooth muscle (Scheid et al., 1979), a similar mechanism has been proposed for the effect of catecholamine on the juxtaglomer-ular cell (Fray, in press). That is, catecholamines stimulate renin secretion by hyperpolarizing the juxtaglomerular cell membrane and thereby pre-vent the influx of extracellular calcium and by ex-truding cellular calcium through a cascade of events which begins with the Na-K pump and ends with Na-Ca exchange (Fray and Park, 1979; Fray, in press).

The stimulatory effects of catecholamines can be overcome completely by the inhibitory effect of high perfusion pressure (Fray, 1978a) and angioten-sin (Vandongen and Peart, 1974). This suggests that factors which inhibit renin secretion by raising cy-toplasmic calcium are more potent than those which stimulate by lowering calcium.

Parathyroid Hormone and Glucagon

Parathyroid hormone and glucagon, which have no known adrenergic activity, stimulate renin secre-tion (Powell et al., 1978; Smith et al., 1979; Vandon-gen et al., 1973; Lester and Rubin, 1977). Parathy-roid hormone also extrudes calcium from kidney cells and, presumably, from juxtaglomerular cells (Borle, 1973), whereas glucagon hyperpolarizes some cell membranes (Somlyo et al., 1971; Dam-bach and Friedmann, 1974) and extrudes calcium from the juxtaglomerular cells (Harada and Rubin, 1978). Since parathyroid hormone and glucagon produce their physiological effect by increasing cyclic AMP production, it might be well to ask whether adenosine compounds affect renin secre-tion. Cyclic AMP and dibutyryl-cyclic AMP stim-ulate renin secretion (Davis and Freeman, 1976), hyperpolarize cell membranes (Dambach and

Friedmann, 1974; Somlyo et al., 1971), and extrude calcium from cellular compartments (Dambach and Friedmann, 1974; Borle, 1974).

Angiotensin

Angiotensin, an agent which depolarizes cell membranes and increases cytoplasmic calcium (Ha-mon and Worcel, 1979; Bolton, 1979; Natke and Kabela, 1979), also inhibits renin secretion by acting specifically on the juxtaglomerular cells (Naftilan and Oparil, 1978; Davis and Freeman, 1976). The magnitude of the angiotensin-induced inhibition of renin secretion depends very strikingly on the cal-cium concentration in the extracellular fluid, the inhibition being greatest when extracellular calcium concentration is largest (Vandongen and Peart, 1974). This suggests that at least one of the mech-anisms whereby angiotensin inhibits renin secretion is dependent on extracellular calcium and possibly on the influx of extracellular calcium, but direct evidence has not been provided. It is interesting to note that the mechanism by which angiotensin stimulates aldosterone secretion from the adrenal cortex also involves depolarization of the glomeru-losa cells (Natke and Kabela, 1979).

Calcium, Magnesium, and Ionophores

Calcium ion concentration in the extracellular fluid plays a key role in the mechanisms controlling renin secretion. Lowering extracellular calcium stimulates renin secretion powerfully (Vandongen and Peart, 1974; Fray, 1977; Fray and Park, 1979; Baumbach and Leyssac, 1977; Logan et al., 1977; Harada and Rubin, 1978), whereas raising calcium inhibits secretion (Kotchen et al., 1977; 1974; Kisch et al., 1976; Watkins et al., 1976). Recently it was shown that lowering extracellular calcium hyper-polarized the membrane potential of parathyroid cells (Bruce and Anderson, 1979). Depolarizing con-centrations of extracellular potassium (50 HIM) par-tially inhibit the renin stimulatory effect of low calcium (Fray and Park, 1979), which suggests that at least one of the mechanisms by which lowering extracellular calcium stimulates renin secretion in-volves membrane hyperpolarization. Whether renal prostaglandins are involved in the stimulatory ef-fect of calcium deprivation is unclear, but this might be possible, especially since renal prostaglandin pro-duction is dependent on calcium transport (Zenser and Davis, 1978).

As with lowering extracellular calcium, raising extracellular concentrations of magnesium stimu-lates renin secretion (Churchill and Lyons, 1976; Fray, 1977; Wilcox, 1978; Ettienne and Fray, 1979). High magnesium concentrations hyperpolarize cell membranes and inhibit net calcium influx (Sigurds-son and Uvelius, 1977; Altura and Altura, 1971; 1974; Woods et al., 1979). Recently it has been shown that depolarizing concentrations of extracel-lular potassium inhibited the stimulatory effect of high magnesium (Ettienne and Fray, 1979).

(6)

490 CIRCULATION RESEARCH VOL. 47, No. 4, OCTOBER 1980 The calcium ionophore A23187, which promotes

calcium entry into cells (Pressman, 1973), inhibits renin secretion in the presence of extracellular cal-cium, presumably by increasing net calcium influx and cytoplasmic calcium (Fynn et al., 1977; Baum-bach and Leyssac, 1977); the ionophore stimulates renin secretion in the absence of extracellular cal-cium, presumably by removing calcium from the cytoplasm. A23187 also depolarizes some cell mem-branes when calcium is present but not when it is absent from the extracellular fluid (Poulsen and Williams, 1977; Cochrane and Douglas, 1975).

Calcium ionophores have exactly the opposite effect on most other secretory systems; that is, they stimulate hormone and transmitter release in the presence of calcium but not in its absence (Nord-mann and Dyball, 1978; Kita and Van der Kloot, 1974). Since calcium ionophores may also break down the integrity of the cell membrane (Williams, 1978) and may release calcium from intracellular storage sites (Desmedt and Hainaut, 1976; Chandler and Williams, 1978), the foregoing results must be interpreted with extreme caution. This last point is particularly important since some workers have shown that calcium ionophores stimulate renin se-cretion in the presence of extracellular calcium

(Worley et al., 1978; Harada et al., 1979).

In summary, renal arterial hypotension, renal vasoconstriction, and intrarenal tissue pressure el-evation stimulate renin secretion by hyperpolariz-ing the juxtaglomerular cell membrane and decreas-ing the permeability to calcium. Conversely, hyper-tension and vasodilation inhibit secretion by depo-larizing the cell and increasing the calcium perme-ability. Movement of calcium then, is, critically dependent on the calcium concentration of the ex-tracellular fluid. During inhibition of renin secre-tion, for example, if the calcium concentration out-side the cell is greater than inout-side and the calcium electrochemical gradient favors movement into the cell, then when the cell is stretched, as by raising perfusion pressure, calcium will enter and increase cytoplasmic calcium. Humoral factors such as /?-adrenergic agonists also may hyperpolarize the jux-taglomerular cell membrane and impede the influx of extracellular calcium. However, such agonists also may stimulate net calcium efflux through a cascade of events beginning with the sodium-potas-sium pump linked to a sodium-calcium exchange mechanism. The net effect of these factors is a reduction of cytoplasmic calcium. Thus, humoral agents such as parathyroid hormone, glucagon, methylxanthines, adenosine compounds, and cal-cium ionophores that have profound effects on membrane potential and calcium movements in cells might be expected to regulate renin secretion in an ordered and predictable fashion.

Acknowledgments

I gratefully acknowledge discussions with Drs. A.J. Cohen, C.S. Park, T.W. Honeyman, C.R. Scheid, Ms L.E. Whitaker, and

Ms N.J. Laurens. I am indebted to Debra George for expert secretarial assistance.

References

Abe Y, Iwao H, Okahara T, Yamamoto K (1977) Control of renin secretion. Jap Circ J 41: 251-257

Altura BM, Altura BT (1971) Influence of magnesium on drug-induced contractions and ion content in rabbit aorta. Am J Physiol 220: 938-944

Altura BM, Altura BT (1974) Magnesium and contraction of arterial smooth muscle. Microvasc Res 7: 145-155

Anderson DK (1976) Cell potential and the sodium-potassium pump in vascular smooth muscle. Fed Proc 35: 1294-1297 Baker PF, Glitsch HG (1975) Voltage-dependent changes in the

permeability of nerve membranes to calcium and other diva-lent cations. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond B 270: 389-409 Baumbach L, Leyssac PP (1977) Studies on the mechanism of

renin release from isolated superfused rat glomeruli: Effects of calcium, calcium ionophore and lanthanum. J Physiol (Lond)

273: 745-764

Berl T, Henrich WL, Erickson AL, Schrier RW (1979) Prosta-glandins in the beta-adrenergic and baroreceptor-mediated secretion of renin. Am J Physiol 236: F472-F477

Blackshear JL, Spielman WS, Knox FG, Romero JC (1979) Dissociation of renin release and renal vasodilation by pros-taglandin synthesis inhibitors. Am J Physiol 237: F20-F24 Bolton TB (1979) Mechanisms of action of transmitter and other

substances on smooth muscle. Physiol Rev 59: 606-718 Borle AB (1973) Calcium metabolism at the cellular level. Fed

Proc 32: 1944-1950

Borle AB (1974) Cyclic AMP stimulation of calcium efflux from kidney, liver and heart mitochondria. J Membr Biol 16: 221-236

Bruce BR, Anderson NC (1979) Hyperpolarization in mouse parathyroid cells by low calcium. Am J Physiol 236: C15-C21 Capponi AM, Valloton MB (1976) Renin release by rat kidney slices incubated in vitro: role of sodium and of a- and /?-adrenergic receptors, and effect of vincristine. Circ Res 29: 200-203

Chandler DE, Williams JA (1978) Intracellular divalent cation release in pancreatic acinar cells during stimulus-secretion coupling II. Subcellular localization of the fluorescent probe chlorotetracycline. J Cell Biol 76: 386-399

Chen DS, Poisner AM (1976) Direct stimulation of renin release by calcium. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 152: 565-567

Churchill PC, Lyons HJ (1976) Effect of intrarenal arterial infusion of magnesium on renin release in dogs. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 152: 6-10

Cochrane DE, Douglas WW (1975) Depolarizing effects of the ionophores X-537A and A23187 and their relevance to secre-tion. Br J Pharmacol 54: 400-402

Dambach G, Friedmann N (1974) The effects of varying ionic composition of the perfusate on liver membrane potential, gluconeugenesis and cyclic AMP responses. Biochim Biophy Acta 332: 374-386

Davis JO, Freeman RH (1976) Mechanisms regulating renin release. Physiol Rev 56: 1-56

Desmedt JE, Hainaut K (1976) The effect of A23187 ionophore on calcium movements and contraction processes in single barnacle muscle fibers. J Physiol (Lond) 257: 87-107 DeVito E, Gordon SB, Cabrera RR, Fasciolo JC (1970) Release

of renin by rat kidney slices. Am J Physiol 219: 1036-1041 Douglas WW (1968) Stimulus-secretion coupling: the concept

and clues from chromaffin and other cells. Br J Pharmacol 34: 451-474

Douglas WW, Rubin RP (1961) The role of calcium in the secretory response of the adrenal medulla to acetylcholine. J Physiol (Lond) 159: 40-57

Eide I, Loyning E, Kiil F (1973) Evidence for hemodynamic autoregulation of renin release. Circ Res 32: 237-245 Eide I, Loyning E, Langard O, Kiil F (1975) Influence of

etha-crynic acid on intrarenal renin release mechanisms. Kidney Int 8: 158-165

(7)

STIMULUS-SECRETION COUPLING OF RENIN/Fray 491 Eide I, Loyning E, Langard O, Kiil F (1977) Mechanism of renin

release during acute ureteral constriction in dogs. Circ Res 40: 293-299

Eto S, Wood JM, Hutchins M, Fleischer N (1974) Pituitary 45Ca++ uptake and release of ACTH, GH, and TSH: Effect of verapamil. Am J Physiol 226: 1315-1320

Ettienne EM, Fray JCS (1979) Influence of potassium, sodium, calcium, perfusion pressure, and isoprenaline on renin release induced by high concentrations of magnesium. J Physiol (Lond) 292: 373-380

Fishman MC (1976) Membrane potential of juxtaglomerular cells. Nature (Lond) 260: 542-544

Fray JCS (1976) Stretch receptor model for renin release with evidence from perfused rat kidney. Am J Physiol 231: 936-944

Fray JCS (1977) Stimulation of renin release in perfused kidney by low calcium and high magnesium. Am J Physiol 232: F377-F382

Fray JCS (1978a) Stretch receptor control of renin release in perfused rat kidney: effect of high perfusate potassium. J Physiol (Lond) 282: 207-217

Fray JCS (1978b) Mechanism of increased renin release during sodium deprivation. Am J Physiol 234: F376-F380

Fray JCS (in press) Mechanism by which renin secretion from perfused rat kidneys is stimulated by isoprenaline and in-hibited by high perfusion pressure. J Physiol (Lond)

Fray JCS, Karuza AS (in press) Influence of raising albumin concentration on renin release in isolated perfused rat kidneys. J Physiol (Lond)

Fray JCS, Park CS (1979) Influence of potassium, sodium, perfusion pressure, and isoprenaline on renin release induced by calcium deprivation. J Physiol (Lond) 292: 363-372 Fynn M, Onomakpome N, Peart WS (1977) The effects of

ionophores (A23187 and R02-2985) on renin secretion and renal vasoconstriction. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 199: 199-212 Ganong WF (1972) Sympathetic effects on renin secretion:

mech-anism and physiological role. Adv Exp Med Biol 17: 17-32 Gerber JG, Branch RA, Nies AS, Gerkens JF, Shand DG,

Hollifield J, Oates JA (1978) Prostaglandins and renin release. II. Assessment of renin secretion following infusion of PGI2, E2, and D2 into the renal artery of anesthetized dogs. Prosta-glandins 15: 81-88

Hamon G, Worcel M (1979) Electrophysiological study of the action of angiotensin II on the rat myometrium. Circ Res 45: 234-243

Harada E, Rubin RP (1978) Stimulation of renin secretion and calcium efflux from the isolated perfused cat kidney by nor-epinephrine after prolonged calcium deprivation. J Physiol (Lond) 274: 367-379

Harada E, Lester GE, Rubin RP (1979) Stimulation of renin secretion from the intact kidney and from isolated glomeruli by the calcium ionophore A23187. Biochim Biophy Acta 583: 20-27

Hofbauer KG, Zschiedrich H, Gross F (1976) Regulation of renin release and intrarenal formation of angiotensin. Studies in the perfused rat kidney. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 3: 73-93 Hunt CC, Wilkinson RS, Fukami Y (1978) Ionic basis of the

receptor potential in primary endings of mammalian muscle spindles. J Gen Physiol 71: 683-698

Ito Y, Tajima K (1979) An electrophysiological analysis of the actions of prostaglandin on neuromuscular transmission in the guinea-pig vas deferens. J Physiol (Lond) 297: 521-537 Kaloyanides GJ, Bastron RD, DiBona GF (1973) Effect of

ure-teral clamping and increased renal arterial pressure on renin release. Am J Physiol 225: 95-99

Kiil F (1975) Influence of autoregulation on renin release and sodium excretion. Kidney Intern 8: S203-S218

Kisch ES, Dluhy RG, Williams GH (1976) Regulation of renin release by calcium and ammonium ions in normal man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 43: 1343-1350

Kishimoto T, Mackawa M, Miyazaki M, Yamamoto K, Ueda J (1972) Effects of renal venous pressure elevation on renal hemodynamics, urine formation and renin release. Jap Circ J

36: 439-448

Kita H, Van der Kloot W (1974) Calcium ionophore X537A increases spontaneous and phasic quantal release of acetyl-choline at frog neuromuscular junction. Nature 250: 658-660 Kitamura H, Suzuki H, Kuriyama H (1976) Prostaglandin action on the main pulmonary artery and portal vein of the rabbit. Jap J Physiol 26: 681-692

Kotchen TA, Maull KI, Luke R, Rees D, Flamenbaum W (1974) Effect of acute and chronic calcium administration on plasma renin. J Clin Invest 54: 1279-1286

Kotchen TA, Maull KI, Kotchen JM, Luke RG (1977) Effect of calcium gluconate infusion on renin in the dog. J Lab Clin Med 89: 181-189

Kotchen TA, Galla JH, Luke RG (1978) Contribution of chloride to the inhibition of plasma renin by sodium chloride in the rat. Kidney Intern 13: 201-207

Lester GE, Rubin RP (1977) The role of calcium in renin secretion from isolated perfused cat kidney. J Physiol (Lond)

269:93-108

Logan AG, Tenyi I, Peart WS, Breathnach AS, Martin BGH (1977) The effect of lanthanum on renin secretion and renal vasoconstriction. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 195: 327-342 Michelakis AM (1971) The effect of sodium and calcium on renin

release in vitro. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 137: 833-836 Monos E, Cox RH, Peterson LH (1978) Direct effect of

physio-logical doses of arginine vasopressin on the arterial wall in vivo. Am J Physiol 234: H167-H172

Morimoto S, Yamamoto K, Horiuchi K, Tanaka H, Ueda J (1970) A release of renin from dog kidney cortex slices. Jap J Pharmacol 20: 536-545

Naftilan AJ, Oparil S (1978) Inhibition of renin release from rat kidney slices by the angiotensins. Am J Physiol 235: F62-F68 Natke E, Jr, Kabela E (1979) Electrical responses in cat adrenal cortex: possible relation to aldosterone secretion. Am J Physiol

237: E158-E162

Navar LG (1978) Renal autoregulation: Perspective from whole kidney and single nephron studies. Am J Physiol 234: F357-F370

Nolan PL, Reid IA (1978) Mechanism of suppression of renin secretion by clonidine in the dog. Circ Res 42: 206-211 Nordmann JJ, Dyball REJ (1978) Effects of veratridine on Ca

fluxes and the release of oxytocin and vasopressin from the isolated rat neurohypophsis. J Gen Physiol 72: 297-304 Oates JA, Whorton AR, Gerkens JF, Branch RA, Hollifield JW,

Frolich JC (1979) The participation of prostaglandins in the control of renin release. Fed Proc 38: 72-74

Osborn J, Noordewier B, Hook JB, Baile MD (1978) Mechanism of prostaglandin E2 stimulation of renin secretion. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 159: 249-252

Ott CE, Navar LG, Guyton AC (1971) Pressures in static and dynamic states from capsules implanted in the kidney. Am J Physiol 221: 394-400

Park CS, Malvin RL (1978) The role of calcium in the control of renin release. Am J Physiol 235: F22-F25

Peart WS (1977) The kidney as an endocrine organ. Lancet 2: 543-548

Poulsen JH, Williams JA (1977) Effects of the calcium ionophore A23187 on pancreatic acinar cell membrane potentials and amylase release. J Physiol (Lond) 264: 323-339

Powell HR, McCredie DA, Rotenberg E (1978) Renin release by parathyroid hormone in the dog. Endocrinology 103: 985-989 Pressman BC (1973) Properties of ionophores with broad range

cation selectivity. Fed Proc 32: 1698-1703

Raeder M, Omvik P Jr, Kill F (1975) Renal autoregulation: evidence for the transmural pressure hypothesis. Am J Physiol

228: 1840-1846

Rubin RP (1970) The role of calcium in the release of neuro-transmitter substances and hormones. Pharmacol Rev 22: 389-428

Scheid CR, Honeyman TW, Fay FS (1979) Mechanism of /?-adrenergic relaxation of smooth muscle. Nature (Lond) 277: 32-36

Seymore AA, Zehr JE (1979) Influence of renal prostaglandin synthesis on renin control mechanisms in the dog. Circ Res

45: 13-25

(8)

492 CIRCULATION RESEARCH VOL. 47, No. 4, OCTOBER 1980

Sigurdsson SB, Uvelius B (1977) The effects of variations in extracellular magnesium concentration on electrical and me-chanical activity of rat portal vein. Acta Physiol Scand 99: 368-376

Skinner SL, McCubbin JW, Page IH (1964) Control of renin secretion. Circ Res 15: 64-76

Smith JM, Mouw DR, Vander AJ (1979) Effect of parathyroid hormone on plasma renin activity and sodium excretion. Am J Physiol 236: F311-F319

Somlyo AP, Somlyo AV (1968) Vascular smooth muscle I. Nor-mal structure, pathology, biochemistry, and biophysics. Phar-macol Rev 20: 197-272

Somlyo AP, Somlyo AV, Friedmann N (1971) Cyclic adenosine monophosphate, cyclic guanosine monophosphate, and glu-cagon: effects on membrane potential and ion fluxes in the liver. Ann NY Acad Sci 185: 108-114

Thurau K (1964) Renal hemodynamics. Am J Med 36: 698-719 Tobian L (1960) Interrelationship of electrolytes,

juxtaglomeru-lar cells and hypertension. Physiol Rev 40: 280-312

Vander AJ (1967) Control of renin release. Physiol Rev 47: 359-382

Vandongen R, Peart WS, Boyd GW (1973) Adrenergic stimula-tion of renin secrestimula-tion in the isolated perfused rat kidney. Circ Res 32: 290-296

Vandongen R, Peart WS (1974) Calcium dependence of the inhibitory effect of angiotensin on renin secretion in the iso-lated perfused kidney of the rat. Br J Pharmacol 50: 125-129 Watkins BE, Davis JO, Lohmeier TE, Freeman RH (1976) Intrarenal site of action of calcium on renin secretion in dogs.

Circ Res 39: 847-853

Weber PC, Larsson C, Anggard E, Hamberg M, Corey EJ, Nicolaou KC, Samuelsson B (1976) Stimulation of renin release from rabbit renal cortex by arachidonic acid and pros-taglandin endoperoxides. Circ Res 39: 868-874

Whorton AR, Misono K, Hollifield J, Inagami T, Frolich JC, Oates JA (1977) Prostaglandins and renin release. I. Stimula-tion of renin release from rabbit cortical slices by PGI2. Pros-taglandins 14: 1095-1104

Wilcox CS (1978) The effect of increasing the plasma magnesium concentration on renin release from the dog's kidney: inter-actions with calcium and sodium. J Physiol (Lond) 284: 203-217

Williams JA (1978) The effect of the ionophore A23187 on amylase release, cellular integrity and ultrastructure of mouse pancreatic acini. Cell Tissue Res 186: 287-295

WoUheim CB, Kikuchi M, Renold AE, Sharp GWG (1978) The roles of intracellular and extracellular Ca++ in glucose-stimu-lated biphasic insulin release by rat islets. J Clin Invest 62: 451-458

Woods WT, Katholi RE, Urthaler F, James TN (1979) Electro-physiological effects of magnesium on cells in the canine sinus node and false tendon. Circ Res 44: 182-188

Worley RTS, Rich GT, Pryor JS (1978) Effect of calcium iono-phore Br-X537A on renin synthesis and release in Amphiuma

means kidney culture. Nature 271: 174-176

Zenser TV, Davis BB (1978) Effects of calcium on prostaglandin E2 synthesis by rat inner medullary slices. Am J Physiol 235: F213-F218

Figure

Updating...

References

Updating...

Related subjects :