• No results found

IRS Level 2 Processing Concept Status

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "IRS Level 2 Processing Concept Status"

Copied!
43
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

IRS Level 2 Processing

Concept

Status

Stephen Tjemkes, Jochen Grandell and Xavier Calbet

(2)

Introduction

Level 2 Processing Concept

Description of Modules

Proxy data

Conclusion

(3)

MTG-IRS mission objective

• Primary mission objective is to monitor small scale water vapour structures in support of regional and global NWP • A secondary objective is to support the monitoring of

atmospheric dynamics through e.g. the provision of clear sky wind, global instability,..

• A further objective is to support emerging applications regarding chemical weather and air quality

(4)

• Thus primary mission objective calls for accurate

moisture and to a lesser degree temperature profiles

from MTG-IRS observations.

• The development of operational L2 processing

scheme is presented next. How this will be used for

the implementation of an operational scheme is TBD.

(5)

L2 Processing Concept

• Input:

– radiometrically and spectrally calibrated spectra with geometrical information appended

– auxilliary data • Processing split into

Pre-processing to determine the type of scene:

clear/cloudy, dusty, fire, cloud parameter determination. – Quick processing: retrievals using a fast statistical

technique like EOF linear regression, neural networks, etc… – Processing: Physical retrieval (optimal estimation).

Post-processing: formating, gridding, QA, … • Output

(6)

Processing: The Challenge

• Retrievals can be performed for all scenes (though the quality depends on presence of clouds)

• Example iasi L2 (processing 235 channels per spectrum):

– On current system (2CPU IBM power 4 processor): 0.008333 min/spectrum – IRS: >7 106 spectra / BRC

– => 60 000 min to process one BRC

• Note that this is with respect to IBM power 4 Machines (several years old technology). Current state of the art machines (e.g. Power 6) are significant factors faster.

• Still we need to explore all possibilities to keep the L2 processing affordable. So we need to look at

– Implementation:

– Efficient codes (e.g. different RTM) – Parallelisation

– …

– Processing

(7)

End-to-End L2 Processing Chain

• Radiative transfer modeling

• Scenes Analysis

(8)

RTM

• Need for an efficient radiative transfer module – Scene – Inversion PCRTM OSS RTTOV Community ? + ++ ++ Maintenance ? +

(9)

RTTOV vrs OSS: two different approaches

• RTTOV:

– Statistical model for mean transmission – Multiple scattering (TBC)

– Includes Jacobians

– Difficulties wide band imagers • OSS:

– Course resolution line-by-line

– Multiple scattering (Not yet procured) – Jacobians

(10)

RTTOV-OSS Comparison

• 5801 diverse profiles • Sea surface emissivity • T, q, O3 from ECMWF • Rest: climatology • RTTOV-9 – GENLN2, HITRAN 2000, CKD2.4 • OSS – LBLRTM V11.3, HITRAN2004, MT_CKD 1.0 • LBLRTM V11.3 as reference (for 500 profiles)

(11)

Timing Results (in sec/profile)

Direct only Direct + Jacobians

RTTOV – 9 1.11 11.42

OSS - 0.67

(12)

Comparison to IASI

• First OSS

• Second RTIASI

• Averaged results over 500 cases

– Red line mean

(13)
(14)
(15)

Comparison to LBLRTM

• RTTOV SAD were generated using GENLN2

• OSS SAD were generated using LBLRTM

• Difference in performance could be result of

difference in GENLN2 and LBLRTM.

• Single profile

• Red line OSS

(16)
(17)

Summary

• For hyperspectral applications:

– Performance: OSS = RTTOV/16

– Accuracy: OSS compares favourable to reference

• Not shown: For Imager applications:

– Performance OSS = 2*RTTOV

– Accuracy: OSS compares favourable to reference

• We will use OSS for our development of IRS L2

(18)

Expert Note:

• Reduce the number of mono-chromatic calculations

by OSS significantly through the so-called global

training, as opposed to the localised training applied

here (up to factor 10)

• There is room to improve OSS efficiency, by how

much will depend on application (hyperspectral,

imagery)

(19)

Pre-processing: Scenes Analysis

• At Day-1 process only cloud free FOV (+ maybe Low

Level clouds)

• Implemented the SCE by Watts & McNally for

AIRS/IASI.

(20)
(21)
(22)

Cloudy - clear radiances (provided by phil

watts)

Clear radiances *RTTOV- 6 (Matricardi et al.) *Ecmwf T,Q,O3 *Model noise (H.B.HT + F) Cloudy radiances *RTTOV-6 + (Chevallier et al.) Small difference Big difference
(23)

Measured

-M

odel (K)

Model noise (in 6 μm band)

Pressure ranking: all channels

(228 NESDIS NRT)

Cloud emissivity effect

(24)

Measured

-M

odel (K)

Clear-channel id 1: Low-pass filter

δBT(j)

LP[δBT(j)] 10-20 ch

Detect ‘gross’

cloud signal (+ or -)

*

Proceed > higher until LP gradient & signal small
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)

• IASI L2 cloud

mask

(29)

Quantitative Comparson

IASI L2 Cloud Mask

No data Cloudy Clear

No data 1818 0 0

Cloudy 66 1571 84

Clear 4 105 73

ECMWF cloud detection (ECD)

(30)

Conclusion

• Successfully implemented

• Not yet an extensive validation

• Need to apply to MTG-proxy data

• Integrate into end-to-end development chain

• Replace current rtm with OSS

CO2 slicing

alternative methods to be considered

– Gives cloud top pressure and cloud fraction

(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)

IRS L2 Prototype Processor tests

• IRS L2 Prototype Processor running with:

– IASI real data converted to IRS with IASI2IRS tool

– IRS spectra have the original noise coming from IASI – RTM: RTTOV-9.1+IASI2IRS

– Clear sky over ocean selection scenes as for IASI (threshold test method only)

– Bias corrected

– Optimal estimation

– First guess from EOF retrieval – Background from Chevallier

(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)

IRS L2 Inversion: future

• Improve fast retrieval method -> Neural networks? • Introduce faster radiative transfer model -> OSS

• Keep on verifying with real IASI data correct scene classification • Introduce realistic noise into IRS synthetic measurements

• Introduce pseudo-noise diffraction effects into IRS synthetic measurements using proxy data

• Determine minimal set of channels for with Inversion will be applied

• Analyse co-registration errors

• Analyse correlated noise in observations • Analyse spectral calibration errors

• Apply to field experiements (jaivex), proxy data • Compare to independent methods

(40)

Other components

• Surface emissivity retrieval

• Improve accuracy through exploitation of the time

domain (e.g. Kalman filter)

(41)

Proxy Data

• For end-to-end processing chain

• For technical studies like compression, error budgets

• Source

– IASI

– Synthetic based on models run by

– SSEC

(42)

IASI as proxy for IRS

• IASI L1C can be converted into IRS – Select LWIR or MWIR

– Generate Interferogram – De-apodise interferogram – Truncate Interferogram – Convert into spectrum

• Tool to do this is available upon request

(43)

IRS proxy data from WRF

• In support of GOES-R H. Huang, T. Greenwald and xx generated two case studies based upon WRF

• Consider here the European simulation

• Hope to get a sample tape soon, to see if we can transfer data using LTO III data-tapes • Data needs to be converted into IRS (and possible other candidate mission) radiances

16-17 August 2006

00-09 UTC 09-15 UTC 15-00 UTC

Temporal Resolution (minute)

Full disk 103 GB 16 TB 3 15 5 15

WRF model output data volume and spatial and temporal resolution for the NCSA MSG simulation.

Domain File Size per Output Time (GB) Total Dataset Size (TB) Spatial Resolution (km)

References

Related documents