O R I G I N A L A R T I C L E UDC: 616.31::616.716.1/.4-053.2-071.3DOI: 10.2298/VSP110224042S
Cephalometric assessment of maxillary length in Serbian children
with skeletal class III
Kefalometrijska procena dužine maksile kod srpske dece sa skeletnom klasom III
Zdenka Stojanoviü*, Predrag Nikoliü†, Angelina Nikodijeviü†, Jasmina Miliü‡,Branislav Stojanoviü§
*Clinic for Dentistry, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia; †Clinic for Jaw Orthopedics, School of Dental Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia;, ‡Clinic for Jaw Orthopedics,
School of Dental Medicine, Panþevo, Serbia; §Military Health Department, Ministry of Defence, Belgrade, Serbia
Abstract
Background/Aim. Malocclusion of skeletal class III is a complex irregularity of sagittal inter-jaw relationship, which is due to irregularities of sagittal position of one or both of the jaw bones, which is often associated with disproportionate ratio of their length. The aim of this study was to determine whether the length of the jaw of children with skeletal class III in the period of mixed dentition was changed. Methods. Fifty children with skeletal class III and the same number of those with skeletal class I, of both sexes, have been selected on the basis of cephalometric analysis of profile tele-x-ray of the head. All the children aged 6–12 had mixed dentition, and were divided according to sex and age into three sub-groups within each group. The length of maxilla, mandible and cranial base were measured. Proportions among the lengths measured within each group were found and differ-ence significance in the measured lengths and their propor-tions among groups and subgroups were evaluated. Results. The children with skeletal class III, compared with the find-ings in the control group, had significantly lower values of maxillary length, total maxillary length, as well as lower values of their lengths in proportion to lengths of the front or the total length of cranial base and in proportion to mandibular lengths (p < 0.05). Among the patients of different sexes, both in the test and the control group, a significant difference in the values of the measured lengths was found. Conclu-sion. The children with skeletal class III have significantly shorter maxilla than those with skeletal class I.
Key words:
cephalometry; maxilla; child; serbia; malocclusion, angle class III.
Apstrakt
Uvod/Cilj. Malokluzija skeletne klase III je kompleksna nepravilnost sagitalnog meĀuviliÿnog odnosa, koji nastaje usled nepravilnosti sagitalnog položaja jedne, ili obe viliÿne kosti, što je ÿesto udruženo sa neproporcionalnim odno-som njihovih dužina. Cilj ove studije bio je da se utvrdi da li je kod dece sa skeletnom klasom III u doba mešovite denticije izmenjena dužina gornje vilice. Metode. Pede-sotoro dece sa skeletnom klasom III i isto toliko sa skelet-nom klasom I, oba pola, selekcionisano je na osnovu ke-falometrijske analize profilnih telerendgenskih snimaka glave. Sva deca su imala mešovitu denticiju, bila su starosti 6–12 godina i podeljena su prema polu i uzrastu na tri podgrupe u svakoj grupi. Merene su dužine maksile, man-dibule i kranijalne baze. UtvrĀivane su proporcije izmeĀu izmerenih dužina unutar svake grupe i procenjivana zna-ÿajnost razlika izmerenih dužina i njihovih proporcija iz-meĀu grupa i podgrupa. Rezultati. Kod dece sa skelet-nom klasom III, u poreĀenju sa nalazom u kontrolnoj grupi, utvrĀene su znaÿajno manje vrednosti dužine tela maksile, totalne dužine maksile, kao i manje vrednosti nji-hovih dužina proporcionalno dužinama prednje, odnosno totalne dužine kranijalne baze i proporcionalno dužinama mandibule (p < 0,05). IzmeĀu ispitanika razliÿitog pola, i u ispitnoj i u kontrolnoj grupi, utvrĀena je znaÿajnost razlike za vrednosti merenih dužina. Zakljuÿak. Kod dece sa skeletnom klasom III, maksila je znaÿajno kraýa nego kod dece sa skeletnom klasom I.
Kljuÿne reÿi:
kefalometrija; maksila; deca; srbija; malokluzija, anglova klasa III.
Introduction
Malocclusion of skeletal class III is a complex irregu-larity of sagittal inter-jaw relationship, which is due to
ir-regularities of sagittal position of one or both of the jaw bones. Position irregularity of the jaw bones is often associ-ated with disproportionate ratio of their length. One of the most common components present in the facial morphology
of patients was insufficient development of middle face, with consequently lower maxillary length, which is why some authors suggest that the anatomical structure itself was a de-cisive factor for classifying patients with malocclusion class III 1–5. During the development of human fetuses, studies
show that the central part of facial complex is clearly distin-guishable pretty early, in the week 9 of fetal life. The size of premaxilla is an important indicator in the development of mid-facial complex. In humans, at birth, premaxillary region remains recognizable on maxilla, separated from it by pre-maxillary–maxillary suture and retains the ability of active osteogenesis, which is visible on palate and floor of nose. For these reasons, the size of spine nazalis anterior depends on the time of healing premaxillary–maxillary suture, which can have an impact on the growth of middle face. Nasal septum has an important, direct role in the growth of pre-maxilla, and thus an indirect role in the growth of maxilla. In accordance with the hypothesis of the septomedial traction in the growth of facial massif (middle face), the development process associated with malocclusion class III, can be asso-ciated with cartilaginous growth on septopresfenoidal joint 6.
Nasal capsule and nasal septum affect the forward movement of upper parts of maxilla, the expansion of space the lateral walls of nasal cavity and the development of premaxilla. Many authors are also convinced that vomero-palatine suture is important for anterior-inferior displacement of palatal bone. Traumatic nasomaxillary complex leads to abnormali-ties in the growth of nasal septum, and surrounding muscle dysfunction may affect the subsequent growth of the facial massif 7. Accordingly, the growth of nasomaxillary complex
is the result of two main mechanisms: passive transfer, which is due to the growth of cranial base, which “pushes” maxilla forward and active growth of maxillary and nasal structures. A growth model requires the face to grow “below the cra-nium”, which means that during growth and development, the jaw must be moved down and forward in relation to cra-nial base, thanks to the sutures by which it is attached to the cranial base. During this shift, the space to open on sutures is filled with the bone proliferation in these areas. Apposition of bone occurs on both sides of the suture, so that the bone to which maxilla is attached also becomes greater. In addition, the front structures of maxilla are subject to remodeling, so that almost its entire front surface is the resorption area 8.
Although cranial growth can affect the position of maxilla, maxillary growth takes place by translation, rotation and elongation within their skeletal dimensions. So, Marcus et al. 9 believe that maxillary growth in people is expressed in:
the anterior translation of maxilla because of moving forward the anterior cranial base; pneumaticizing frontal sinuses and maxillary leaning forward; moving maxilla down; lateral shifting due to appositional growth on medium-palatal su-ture. Having said thath, the direction of growth of the upper jaw can influence the direction of eruption of upper perma-nent iucisors, which is an important early correction of their oral inclination 10, 11. Deviations in the normal development
of the maxillary complex can have a significant impact on the development of skeletal class III. This fact has focused our study in children with skeletal class III just on maxilla, as
the anatomical structure whose prepubertal development, be-sides genetic predisposition, may be compromised by an of-ten present adenoid problem and respiratory diseases that make it difficult to breath through the nose, which directly threatens the maxillary growth in children at this age.
Methods
The study used tele-x-ray profile head shots made in its natural position, with lateral teeth in maximum intercuspid-ity. The recordings are drawn through acetate paper, marking relevant cephalometric points, lines, planes and angles, which are used in the angular and linear measurements. The study included children with mixed dentition, aged 6–12, which were classified into two groups, 50 patients each, both sexes (25 males and 25 females). The first, test group, con-sisted of children with skeletal class III, selected on the basis of the value of angle ANB 0°. The second, control group, consisted of children with skeletal class I, selected on the ba-sis of normal values of angles of sagittal jaw position in re-lation to the cranial base, SNA = 80°–82°, SNB = 78°–80° and the angle of sagittal interjaw relationship, ANB = 2°–4° (Figure 1). The average age in the first group was 8 years
and 9 months, in the second group, 9 years and three months. The patients from both groups were divided into subgroups according to age: the subgroup a – children aged 6–7 years and 11 months, subgroup b – children aged 8–9 years and 11 months and subgroup c – children aged 10–11 years and 11 months. Testing did not include the children with congenital anomalies, clefts and anodontia of some teeth. The length of Fig. 1 – Angular cephalometric measurements for the
selection into groups used in the study.
SNA – angle of sagittal maxillary position in relation to the cranial base an-terior; SNB – angle of sagittal mandibulary position in relation to the cranial
maxilla, mandible and cranial base were measured (Figure 2). Proportions among the lengths measured within each
group were found and difference significance in the meas-ured lengths and their proportions among the groups and subgroups were evaluated. The results of measurement in children with skeletal class III were compared to the results of measuring the same parameters in children with skeletal class I, and to determine the difference significance of the obtained values test method Multiple Comparisons, Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon test were used. Statistical interpretation was accepted on the probability level *p 0.05 significant, **p 0.01 highly significant, NS – p > 0.05 -no significant.
Results
Length of anterior cranial base (Nse) (Tables 1, 2)
Measuring the length of anterior cranial base in the group I of the patients, its average length of 72.20 mm was found in the range of values from 64.00 mm to 84.00 mm. In the group II of the patients, its length ranged from 64.00 mm
to 82.00 mm, an average of 73.52 mm. The difference in the measured average values in the groups I and II was not sta-tistically significant (p > 0.05). Significance of the difference in the values of this parameter in males and females, in the same age subgroups was not found in either of the groups (p > 0.05).
Total length of the cranial base (Nba) (Tables 1, 2)
Total length of the cranial base in the group I of the pa-tients ranged from minimum 96.00 mm to a maximum of 121.00 mm, an average of 106.53 mm. Significance of the difference in the measured values in the patients of different sex was found only in the oldest subgroup (p 0.05). In the group II of the patients, the measured total lengths of the cranial base ranged from 99.00 mm to 120.00 mm, an aver-age of 109.06 mm. These values were significantly different from those measured in the patients of the group I (p 0.05). The average values of the parameter NBa measured in the males and females of the same age subgroups were not sig-nificantly different (p > 0.05).
Total length of the upper jaw (CdA) (Tables 1, 2)
Total length of the upper jaw in the group I, ranged from minimum 75.00 mm to a maximum of 97.00 mm, an average value was 82.82 mm. The difference in average values of this parameter males and females of the same age subgroups was not significant (p > 0.05). In the group II of the patients, the values of total length of the upper jaw were measured, ranging from 75.00 mm to 99.00 mm, an average of 87.46 mm. These values were significantly different from those set forth in the group I (p 0.05). The values of this parameter in the patients of different sexes were significantly different only in the oldest subgroup (p 0.05).
Length of maxilla body (A*Snp*) (Tables 1, 2)
In the patients of the group I the values of the body length of the upper jaw were set in the interval from 39.00 mm to 52.00 mm, an average of 44.44 mm. Significance of the difference in the values of the measured parameter in the patients of different sexes of the same age subgroups was found only in the subgroup of the oldest (p 0.05). Body length of the upper jaw in the group II of the patients was 47.52 mm on average, ranging from 41.00 mm to 54.00 mm, which was significantly different from the value of this pa-rameter in the group I (p 0.05). There was significant dif-ference in its value in patients of different sexes of middle age subgroup (p 0.05).
Total mandibular length (CdGn) (Tables 1, 2)
The average total length of mandible in the group I was 116.52 mm, and the measured values ranged from 105.00 mm to 141.00 mm. A significant difference of average total mandibular lengths in the patients of different sexes was not proven in either of the age groups (p > 0.05). In the patients of the group II, the average total mandibular length of 115.76 mm was found with ranging from 105.00 mm to 127.00 mm. These values were not significantly different from those in
Fig. 2 – Cephalometric landmarks, reference lines and linear measurements for assessing maxillary length used in the
study.
S – indicates sella (the center of sella turcica); Se – the center of apertura sella turcica; N – nasion (the most anterior limit of suture nasofrontalis); Ba – basion (the posterior inferior point of the occipital bone at the anterior margin of the foramen magnum); A – subspinale (the most posterior point on the concave an-terior border of the maxillary alveolar process); A* – A point of contact of a perpendicular line drawn from point A to the FH; Snp – spina nasalis anterior (the apex of the anterior nasal spine); Snp* – a point of contact of a perpendicu-lar line drawn from point Snp to the FH; Cd – condylion (the most posterior point on the outline of the mandibular condyle); Pg – pogonion (the most ante-rior point on the mandibular symphysis); Pg* – a point of contact of a perpendi-cular line drawn from point Pg to the MP; Gn – gnathion ( the most anteroinfe-rior point on the mandibular symphysis); Go – gonion (the most outward point on the angle formed by the junction of the ramus and body of the mandible on its posterior. inferior aspect); Me – menton (the lowermost point on the shadow of the mandibular symphysis); Po – porion (the superior aspect of the external auditory meatus); Or – orbite ( the lower border of the orbit of the eye); NSe – length of anterior cranial base (Schwarz); NBa – total length of the cranial base;. CdA – total length of the upper jaw; A*Snp* – length of maxilla body; CdGn – total mandibular length; Pg*Go – mandibular body length.
Table 1 The parameters measured in the study and the results of the groups comparison
Parameters Group Min Med Max ʉ ± SD p
1 39.00 44.50 52.00 44.44 ± 2.98 A*Snp* 2 41.00 47.00 54.00 47.52 ± 2.66 -3.08* 1 75.00 82.00 97.00 82.82 ± 4.74 CdA 2 75.00 88.00 99.00 87.46 ± 4.90 -4.64* 1 68.00 75.50 95.00 75.86 ± 4.94 Pg*Go 2 66.00 76.00 85.00 75.98 ± 4.10 -0.12NS 1 105.00 116.50 141.00 116.52 ± 7.10 CdGn 2 105.00 115.00 127.00 115.76 ± 5.69 0.76NS 1 64.00 72.00 84.00 72.20 ± 4.18 NSe 2 64.00 73.50 82.00 73.52 ± 3.75 -1.32NS 1 96.00 106.00 121.00 106.53 ± 5.15 NBa 2 99.00 109.00 120.00 109.06 ± 4.71 0.04*
NS – no significant difference; * – significant difference (Method of multiple comparisons); A*Snp*/NSe – Proportional relationships of body length of the upper jaw to the anterior cranial base; A*Snp*/Pg*Go – Proportional relationship of body lenght of the upper jaw to mandibulan body length; CdA/CdGn – Proportional relationship of the total lenght of the upper jaw to the total length of the lower jaw; CdA/Nba – Proportional relationship of the total lenght of the upper jaw to the total length of the cranial base; Min – minimal value; Med – median; Max – maximal value; ʉ –mean; SD – standard deviation;
group 1 – children with skeletal class III (test group); group 2 – children with skeletal class I (control group).
Table 2 The parameters measured in the study and the results of the subgroups comparison
ʉ ± SD
Parameters Group Subgroup M F p
a 44.67 ± 3.39 44.00 ± 2.19 0.63 (NS) b 44.50 ± 2.46 44.83 ± 3.71 0.89 (NS) 1 c 45.78 ± 2.05 42.14 ± 3.13 0.03 * a 45.67 ± 5.03 45.75 ± 2.75 1.00 (NS) b 48.18 ± 2.71 46.15 ± 1.82 0.04 * A*Snp* 2 c 49.09 ± 2.12 48.25 ± 2.12 0.48 (NS) a 81.50 ± 4.55 82.00 ± 3.46 0.63 (NS) b 84.30 ± 3.86 82.17 ± 3.64 0.25 (NS) 1 c 85.67 ± 6.50 80.00 ± 4.97 0.06 (NS) a 85.00 ± 4.58 85.50 ± 5.07 0.86 (NS) b 87.91 ± 5.89 85.23 ± 4.57 0.38 (NS) CdA 2 c 91.09 ± 3.96 87.38 ± 2.83 0.03 * a 74.33 ± 3.45 73.17 ± 3.66 0.81 (NS) b 76.70 ± 2.41 74.17 ± 4.39 0.10 (NS) 1 c 81.11 ± 7.37 74.43 ± 1.13 0.01 ** a 74.33 ± 2.08 72.50 ± 5.32 0.59 (NS) b 75.73 ± 4.78 74.62 ± 4.17 0.73 (NS) Pg*Go 2 c 79.18 ± 2.44 76.50 ± 2.27 0.04 * a 112.33 ± 4.63 113.50 ± 4.76 0.75 (NS) b 119.60 ± 5.25 114.25 ± 7.12 0.09 (NS) 1 c 121.11 ± 10.22 116.29 ± 4.07 0.43 (NS) a 114.33 ± 5.03 113.00 ± 5.10 0.72 (NS) b 116.27 ± 5.02 112.23 ± 5.76 0.06 (NS) CdGn 2 c 121.18 ± 4.47 115.25 ± 3.41 0.01 * a 73.17 ± 4.02 71.67 ± 2.07 0.63 (NS) b 73.90 ± 2.42 71.42 ± 3.80 0.05 * 1 c 74.33 ± 6.04 68.00 ± 2.65 0.03 * a 71.00 ± 3.61 74.00 ± 2.31 0.27 (NS) b 73.82 ± 4.31 71.46 ± 3.82 0.21 (NS) NSe 2 c 75.91 ± 3.36 73.88 ± 2.23 0.16 (NS) a 105.33 ± 4.18 103.50 ± 2.59 0.52 (NS) b 107.70 ± 2.98 106.67 ± 6.13 0.35 (NS) 1 c 111.13 ± 6.36 103.00 ± 2.71 0.02 * a 108.33 ± 2.08 108.25 ± 4.92 0.86 (NS) b 109.18 ± 5.65 106.92 ± 4.66 0.50 (NS) NBa 2 c 112.09 ± 3.53 108.88 ± 4.36 0.08 (NS)
NS – no significant difference; * – significant difference; ** (Mann–Whitney and Wilcoxon test) A*Snp* - length of maxilla body; CdA – total length of the upper jaw; Pg*Go – mandibular body length;
CdGn – total mandibular length; Nse – length of anterior cranial base; Nba – total length of the cranial base; M – male; F – female;ʉ– mean; SD – standard deviation; group 1 – children with skeletal clas III (test group); group 2 – children with skeletal class I (control group); a – children aged 6– 7 years and 11 months; b – children aged 8–9 years and 11 months; c – children aged 10–11 years.
the group I (p > 0.05). A significant difference in the values of this parameter in the patients of different sexes was found in the oldest subgroup (p 0.01).
Mandibular body length (Pg*Go) (Tables 1, 2)
The patients of the group I had an average mandibular length of 75.86 mm, and the measured values were within the range of 68.00 mm to 95.00 mm. A significant difference of the measured values was found in the oldest subgroup of male and female patients (p 0.05). In the patients of the group II, the measured mandibular body lengths ranged from 66.00 mm to 85.00 mm, the average of 75.98 mm. A signifi-cant difference was not found in the values of this parameter in the tested groups (p > 0.05). A significant difference in the measured values of this parameter in the patients of different sexes was found in the oldest subgroup (p > 0.05).
Proportional relationship of body length of the upper jaw to the anterior cranial base (A*Snp*/Nse) (Tables 3, 4)
The average value of this proportion in the group I was 0.62, and the measured values ranged from 0.54 to 0.72. In the patients of the group II, its average value of 0.65 was es-tablished with the measured values ranging from 0.60 to 0.71. These values were significantly different from those in the group I (p 0.05). There was no significant difference in the values of this proportion in the patients of different sexes, or in any age subgroup, test or control group (p > 0.05).
Proportional relationship of body length of the upper jaw to mandibular body length (A*Snp*/Pg*Go) (Tables 3, 4)
In the patients of the group I, the measured values of this proportional relationship ranged from 0.49 to 0.71, with
Table 3 The proportional relationships measurements and the results of the groups comparison Proportional relationships Group Min Med Max ʉ ± SD p
1 0.56 0.62 0.72 0.62 ± 0.04 A*Snp*/NSe 2 0.60 0.65 0.71 0.65 ± 0.03 0.03* 1 0.49 0.58 0.71 0.59 ± 0.04 A*Snp*/Pg*Go 2 0.55 0.63 0.68 0.63 ± 0.03 0.04* 1 0.65 0.72 0.77 0.71 ± 0.03 CdA/CdGn 2 0.69 0.76 0.80 0.76 ± 0.03 0.04* 1 0.72 0.77 0.85 0.78 ± 0.03 CdA/NBa 2 0.72 0.80 0.87 0.80 ± 0.03 0.02*
* significant difference (Method of multiple comparisons) A*Snp* - length of maxilla body; CdA – total length of the upper jaw; Pg*Go – mandibular body length; CdGn – total mandibular length; Nse – Length of anterior cra-nial base; Min – minimal value; Med – median; Max – maximal value; ʉ –mean; SD – standard deviation; group 1 – children with skeletal class III (test group); group 2 – children with skeletal class I (control group).
Table 4 The proportional relationships measurements and the results of the subgroups comparison
ʉ ± SD
Proportional relationships Group Subgroup/years M F p
a 0.61 ± 0.03 0.62 ± 0.03 0.69 (NS) b 0.60 ± 0.04 0.63 ± 0.05 0.27 (NS) 1 c 0.62 ± 0.04 0.62 ± 0.04 0.83 (NS) a 0.64 ± 0.06 0.62 ± 0.02 0.71 (NS) b 0.65 ± 0.03 0.65 ± 0.03 0.68 (NS) A*Snp*/NSe 2 c 0.65 ± 0.03 0.65 ± 0.03 0.71 (NS) a 0.60 ± 0.06 0.61 ± 0.06 0.87 (NS) b 0.58 ± 0.03 0.61 ± 0.04 0.11 (NS) 1 c 0.57 ± 0.04 0.57 ± 0.04 0.56 (NS) a 0.62 ± 0.06 0.63 ± 0.04 0.86 (NS) b 0.64 ± 0.03 0.62 ± 0.03 0.10 (NS) A*Snp*/Pg*Go 2 c 0.62 ± 0.03 0.63 ± 0.04 0.26 (NS) a 0.77 ± 0.03 0.79 ± 0.02 0.20 (NS) b 0.78 ± 0.05 0.77 ± 0.02 0.77 (NS) 1 c 0.77 ± 0.04 0.78 ± 0.04 0.75 (NS) a 0.78 ± 0.04 0.79 ± 0.05 0.71 (NS) b 0.80 ± 0.04 0.80 ± 0.03 0.95 (NS) CdA/NBa 2 c 0.81 ± 0.03 0.80 ± 0.03 0.43 (NS) a 0.73 ± 0.03 0.72 ± 0.03 0.63 (NS) b 0.71 ± 0.03 0.72 ± 0.02 0.18 (NS) 1 c 0.71 ± 0.02 0.69 ± 0.03 0.11 (NS) a 0.74 ± 0.03 0.76 ± 0.04 0.48 (NS) b 0.76 ± 0.03 0.76 ± 0.03 0.68 (NS) CdA/CdGn 2 c 0.76 ± 0.02 0.76 ± 0.02 0.56 (NS)
NS – no significant difference (Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon test) A*Snp*/Nse – Proportional relationships of body length of the upper jaw to the anterior cranial base; A*Snp*/Pg*Go – Proportional relationships of body length of the upper jaw to the mandibular body length; CdA/Nba – Proportional relationships of the total length of the cranial base; CdA/CdGn – Proportional relationships of body length of the lower jaw M – male; F – female;ʉ– mean; SD – standard deviation; group 1 – children with skeletal clas III (test group); group 2 – children with skeletal class I (control group); a – children aged 6–7 years and 11 months; b – children aged 8–9 years and 11 months; c – children aged 10–11 years.
the average of 0.59. The patients of the group II had the av-erage value of the proportion A*Snp*/Pg*Go of 0.63, rang-ing from 0.55 to 0.68. These values were significantly differ-ent from those in the patidiffer-ents of the (p 0.05). A significant difference in the average values of the tested proportional relationship was not found in the patients of different sexes within the same age groups, test or control group (p > 0.05).
Proportional relationship of the upper – lower jaws total length (CdA/CdGn) (Tables 3, 4)
The set values of the proportional relationship in the group I of patients ranged from 0.65 to 0.77, with the aver-age of 0.71. The results of measuring the proportion CdA/CdGn in the patients of the group II were significantly different from those found in the group I (p 0.05). Its val-ues in the group II ranged from 0.69 to 0.80. The average value for the whole group was 0.76. As in the group I, there was no significant difference in the measured values in the patients of different sexes, belonging to the same age sub-groups (p > 0.05).
Proportional relationship of the total length of the upper jaw to the total length of the cranial base (CdA/Nba) (Tables 3, 4)
By measuring this proportional relationship in the group I of the patients values ranged from 0.72 to 0.85, with the average of 0.78, were found. In the group II of the patients, the same proportion ranged from 0.72 to 0.87, with the aver-age of 0.80, which was significantly different from values in the group I (p 0.05). A significant difference in the values of the tested proportional relationship among the members of different sexes, within the same age groups, was not found in either of the groups (p > 0.05).
Discussion
Data from the literature indicate that the size and pro-portion of the maxilla are the major etiological factor during its growth for skeletal class III development. The authors often point out that the maxillary retrognatism is usually masked and cannot be recorded through angular analysis, due to the changed length and angulations of the cranial base, which affect the position of the point nasion, directly responsible for the size of many indicators of sagittal maxil-lary position (SNA, FHNA, ANV...) 11–13. Therefore, some
authors prefer to use linear measures, which do not represent actual anatomical length of the jaw bones, but a linear dis-tance from the tip of the condylary process to the body limit of the jaw bone and its alveolar processus (total length), or the distance between the farthest anatomical points, or their structures, which limit the bodies of the jaw bones. However, those sizes are very individual and depend on age, sex and physical dimensions of patients, so that their absolute values do not say much. We get much more data when we look at these sizes compared to the total length of the cranial base and the total length of the other jaw bone, thus determining its relative or proportional value. It is accepted that the pro-portion of length of the upper jaw body should be a 7/10
length of NSe (A*Snp*/NSe = 0.7) and 2/3 length of the lower jaw body (A*Snp*/Pg*Go = 0.67). In the literature, we find conflicting opinions on the issue of finding the total length and body length of the maxilla in patients with skele-tal class III during growth. Thus, the results of maxilla length in children during primary dentition show that there is a highly significant difference in its size in children with skeletal class III, where its body is shorter, compared to chil-dren with skeletal class I 14. The results of measurements of
maxilla total length show that it is shorter in patients with skeletal class III than in those with skeletal class I, in all age groups from 6 to 16, but that the difference in its length is not statistically significant 15. Neither the results of maxilla
total length measurements in a study performed in Korean children with primary dentition indicate significant differ-ences between the measured lengths in children with skeletal class I and those with skeletal class III 16. The research
con-ducted on adult patients with skeletal class III found the ex-istence of significantly lower total maxillary length, com-pared to patients with skeletal class I 17. In our study, the
group with skeletal class III showed significantly lower val-ues of the body length and total maxillary length, both their absolute values (A*Snp*, CdA), and relative values in rela-tion to the cranial base (A*Snp*/NSe, CdA/NBa) and the mandibular length (A*Snp*/Pg*Go, CdA/CdGn) as com-pared to children with skeletal class I. Proportional relation-ships CdA/NBa, A*Snp*/NSe are, apart from a reduced maxillary length, additionally distorted by significantly lower total length of the cranial base, and the length of the anterior cranial base, which is lower in the group with skeletal class III, although the difference compared to the re-sults of the control group is not significant. Irregularities of the tested proportions, A*Snp*/Pg*Go, CdA/CdGn can be considered to be the sole consequence of significantly lower maxillary lengths, since mandibular lengths were not signifi-cantly changed in children with skeletal class III, also shown by the results of our previous studies 18. The degree of
pro-portion irregularities of total maxillary and mandibular lengths is considered to be an important factor in predicting effectiveness of the therapy, so if it is very high, it is a bad prognostic sign 19. Therefore, the application of orthodontic
and orthopedic appliances to encourage sagittal maxillary growth in the period of mixed dentition is imposed as an im-perative. In patients of different sex within the same age subgroups, significant differences of the values of some tested parameters were found, both in the group with skeletal class III and in the group with skeletal class I. It is interesting that a significant difference in the values of absolute and not proportional jaw lengths was found. In children with skeletal class I, the total lengths of both jawbones and mandibular body length were significantly higher in male patients in the oldest, and maxillary body length in the middle age sub-group. In children with skeletal class III, the body length of both jawbones were significantly higher in male patients in the oldest subgroup, while a significant difference in their total lengths was not found in either of the age subgroups. Data on the value of total maxillary length, measured in a longitudinal study on growth in children with normal
occlu-sion at the age of 6, 9, 12, 14, 16 and 18, indicate its greater length in male patients of all age groups, but also that the dif-ference in length becomes significant only from the age of 14, when in female patients the growth in the length stag-nates, and in male patients it continues after the tested pe-riod 20. Similar information is also found in the longitudinal
study of growth in untreated patients with skeletal class III, of the same age interval, where significantly higher total length of maxilla in the male patients can be found only at the age of 13 and over 21. A significant difference in maxillary
length among patients of different sexes also depends on eth-nicity. The results of comparative studies in Chinese and Cau-casian patients with normal occlusion show that in both ethnic groups in female patients a significantly lower total maxillary length and significantly greater difference between the total jaw lengths than in male patients were found 22. In the oldest
subgroups of the test and control groups of children, signifi-cantly higher mandibular body length in male patients was found. In children with skeletal class III, difference signifi-cance of the measured mandibular total lengths among patients of different sexes within the same age subgroups was not found while in the group with skeletal class I, in the oldest subgroup, a significantly higher mandibular total length in male patients was found. A significant difference of the meas-ured average lengths of the cranial base in patients of different sexes was found only in the group with skeletal class III, for the values of anterior cranial base in the middle and oldest groups, and for the values of total length of the cranial base, in the oldest subgroup, where male patients had significantly higher length of these parameters. These findings clearly indi-cate the existence of sexual dimorphism in terms of linear lengths of various anatomical structures of the craniofacial
complex. In the same age subgroups, in children with skeletal classes I and III, there was a significant difference in linear values of maxillary but not mandibulary lengths. This finding could be explained by the fact that mandibular growth, usually longer than the length of maxillary growth, lasts longer in pa-tients with skeletal class III, since studies show that the pu-bertal peak of growth in them is also significantly longer, for about five months 23. Therefore, a significant difference of
mandibular lengths could be expected only before the end of the pubertal peak, when the results of application of functional orthodontic and orthopedic appliances for modification of the growth type are already very limited. For these reasons, the estimated lower maxillary lengths, could be considered an early indicator of development of skeletal class III and impor-tant signal for the start of its timely treatment.
Conclusion
The results obtained in the study show that children with skeletal class III have significantly lower maxillary length than children with skeletal class I. Children with skeletal class III, compared to children with skeletal class I, have a lower absolute maxillary body length, lower total maxillary length, lower maxillary body length proportional to the lengths of anterior cranial base and mandibular body, and lower total maxillary length proportional to the total lengths of the cranial base and mandible. Comparing the re-sults of measuring the proportional maxillary lengths in pa-tients of different sex, in the same age subgroups, a signifi-cant difference was not found, while signifisignifi-cantly higher lengths in male patients were found for the absolute values of the measured parameters.
R E F E R E N C E S
1. Dibbets JM. Morphological associations between the Angle classes. Eur J Orthod 1996; 18(2): 111î8.
2. Singh GD, McNamara JA Jr, Lozanoff S. Localisation of defor-mations of the midfacial complex in subjects with class III malocclusions employing thin-plate spline analysis. J Anat 1997; 191(Pt 4): 595î602.
3. Singh GD, McNamara JA Jr, Lozanoff S. Finite element mor-phometry of the midfacial complex in subjects with Angle's Class III malocclusions. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1997; 17(3): 112î20.
4. Singh GD, McNamara JA Jr, Lozanoff S. Morphometry of the midfacial complex in subjects with class III malocclusions: Procrustes, Euclidean, and cephalometric analyses. Clin Anat 1998; 11(3): 162î70.
5. Park JU, Baik SH. Classification of Angle Class III malocclu-sion and its treatment modalities. Int J Adult Orthodon Or-thognath Surg 2001; 16(1): 19î29.
6. Moss-Salentijn L. Melvin L. Moss and the functional matrix. J Dent Res 1997; 76(12): 1814î7.
7. Singh GD. Morphologic determinants in the etiology of class III malocclusions: a review. Clin Anat 1999; 12(5): 382î405. 8. Proffit W. Contemporary orthodontics. 2nd ed. St. Louis: CV
Mosby Co; 1993.
9. Marcus AF, Corti M, Loy A, Naylor GJP, Slice DE. Advances in morphometrics. New York: Plenum Press; 1996.
10. Ostyn JM, Maltha JC, van 't Hof MA, van der Linden FP. The role of interdigitation in sagittal growth of the maxillomandibular complex in Macaca fascicularis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 109(1): 71î8.
11. Tollaro I, Baccetti T, Franchi L. Craniofacial changes induced by early functional treatment of Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 109(3): 310î8.
12. Mouakeh M. Cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial pattern of Syrian children with Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 119(6): 640î9.
13. Stojanoviý ZM, Miliý J, Nikoliý P. Radiographic cephalometry as-sessment of the linear and angular parameters on cranial base in children with skeletal class III. Vojnosanit Pregl 2007; 64(9): 604î10. (Serbian)
14. Chang HP, Kinoshita Z, Kawamoto T. Craniofacial pattern of Class III deciduous dentition. Angle Orthod 1992; 62(2): 139î44.
15. Reyes BC, Baccetti T, McNamara JA Jr. An estimate of craniofa-cial growth in Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod 2006; 76(4): 577î84.
16. Choi HJ, Kim JY, Yoo SE, Kwon JH, Park K. Cephalometric characteristics of Korean children with Class III malocclusion in the deciduous dentition. Angle Orthod 2010; 80(1): 86î90. 17. Ramezanzadeh B, Pousti M, Bagheri M. Cephalometric
Adults of Mashhad. Iran J Dent. Res Dent Clin Dent Pros-pects 2007; 1(3): 125î130.
18. Stojanoviý Z, Nikodijeviý A, Udoviciý B, Miliý J, Nikoliý P. Size of lower jaw as an early indicator of skeletal class III develop-ment. Vojnosanit Pregl 2008; 65(8): 589î95. (Serbian) 19. Zentner A, Doll GM, Peylo SM. Morphological parameters as
predictors of successful correction of Class III malocclusion. Eur J Orthod 2001; 23(4): 383î92.
20. Ursi WJ, Trotman CA, McNamara JA Jr, Behrents RG. Sexual di-morphism in normal craniofacial growth. Angle Orthod 1993; 63(1): 47î56.
21. Baccetti T, Reyes BC, McNamara Jr JA. Gender Differences in Class III Malocclusion, Angle Orthod 2004; 75(4): 510î20. 22. Wu J, Hägg U, Rabie AB. Chinese norms of McNamara's
cephalometric analysis. Angle Orthod 2007; 77(1): 12î20. 23. Kuc-Michalska M, Baccetti T. Duration of the pubertal peak in
skeletal Class I and Class III subjects. Angle Orthod 2010; 80(1): 54î7.
Received on Februar 24, 2011. Revised on December 31, 2011. Accepted on February 7, 2012. OnLine-First November, 2012.
