• No results found

Correctional Social Work

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Correctional Social Work"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

BACKGROUND

The United States imprisons a larger propor-tion of its populapropor-tion than any other industri-alized nation (Singer, Bussey, Song, & Lunghofer, 1995). In fact, the present U.S. rate of incarceration is six times the global average (Franklin, 1998). There are now 1.6 million Americans behind bars, more than twice as many as a decade ago, and new facilities are constantly being built. Of these numbers, an increasing percentage is female. In 1990, 10 percent of all jail detainees were women, a 273 percent increase since 1985 (Versay, 1998). Even from a purely economic standpoint, we must be concerned about this overwhelming growth of those who are in prisons and jails and begin looking at ways to reduce rates of incarceration and recidivism. Social work professionals are uniquely qualified to assist in this area.

Institutionalized racism has contributed to the fact that over 50 percent of those in prisons are of African descent and another 15 percent are Latino (Kupers, 1999). Racial profiling, dis-crimination, and the denial of vital resources have contributed to people of color being over represented in the prison population. One out of three males of African descent aged 20–24 are under some form of correctional supervi-sion. Most are young; many are parents of dependent children. New admissions to correc-tional settings in recent years are increasingly for nonviolent-related crimes (Roberts, 1997).

Numbers of individuals incarcerated for drug offenses increased from 50,000 in 1980 to 400,000 today. Recent findings show younger prisoners staying longer due to inconsistencies between state and federal sentencing. Many states are looking for alternatives to mandatory sentencing, mainly treatment programs (Egan, 1999). NASW has not taken a position on

mandatory sentencing that is overcrowding prisons with drug-related offenses.

Jails and prisons have become receiving facilities for a host of disguised health, welfare, and social problems. The number of inmates that test positive for the human ciency virus (HIV) and acquired immunodefi-ciency syndrome (AIDS) is on the rise. The dis-mantling of psychiatric hospitals and fragmentation of the community mental health system have shifted the care of people with chronic mental illnesses to correctional institu-tions. Two to three times as many jail detainees suffer from severe mental disorders than the general population; 610,000 inmates with severe mental illnesses are admitted annually to U.S. jails (Morris & Steadman, 1994). Abuse of alcohol and drugs is a major contributor to criminal behavior as well as family disintegra-tion, economic instability, and social isolation.

The correctional system has evolved to meet several social functions. Among these are social control, protection of the public, retribu-tion, and—perhaps the most debated func-tion—rehabilitation. In recent years, the focus of the correctional system has been on punish-ment rather than on rehabilitation. A system focused on social control, protection, and retri-bution can lead to policies that promote dis-crimination and social injustice, as is evidenced by the disproportionately high rate of incarcer-ation of people of color, and thwart social inte-gration of those who serve time and are ready for release into society. Without proper resources to advocate for emotional, intellec-tual, vocational, physical, and social growth, people serving time are at risk of unemploy-ment, homelessness, lack of social support, dis-crimination, and recidivism after release. In

(2)

turn, their families, communities, and society as a whole are affected.

The incarcerated population in the United States has increased, on average, 6.6 percent per year from 1990 to 1996. In 1996 there were 1,630,940 offenders behind bars (U.S. Department of Justice, 1996). Increasing num-bers of women being incarcerated, over-repre-sentation of people of color, and the trend toward incarcerating youthful offenders create a need for change within the correctional sys-tem. The cost of incarcerating offenders is also escalating, putting an overwhelming strain on federal, state, and municipal budgets. Many institutions are overcrowded and understaffed. Recidivism rates are also high, further exacer-bating societal problems. Clearly, some changes must be made within the correctional system to curtail these ever-increasing num-bers, and social work can be a key factor in addressing many of these issues.

THE DRUG–CRIME

CONNECTION

Involvement in a criminal episode frequently occurs following the use of drugs or alcohol (McNeece & Roberts, 1996). According to a 1996 survey by the U.S. Department of Justice, 40 percent of the incarcerated individuals inter-viewed reported they were under the influence of drugs or were very drunk at the time they committed their offense. Fully one-third of females incarcerated are arrested for drug charges (Versay, 1998). The number of individu-als incarcerated for drug-related offenses increased from 50,000 in 1980 to 400,000 today (Egan, 1999). Social workers, especially those with training and experience in addictions, can provide valuable input and leadership in the planning, development, and implementation of rehabilitation and drug treatment programs. Counseling, education, and advocacy are other important roles that social workers can play in correctional drug treatment settings.

HEALTH CARE NEEDS

Increasing numbers of individuals entering correctional facilities are seropositive for HIV

and have been exposed to hepatitis, tuberculo-sis, and other infections. Sexually transmitted diseases, pregnancy services. and general health care needs are also increasing. Health care for these and other conditions needs to be adequately provided within the correctional system. Social workers need to be available who are knowledgeable about health care issues and who can provide prevention and education programs as well as support services for people incarcerated with HIV/AIDS, other health conditions, and those battling chronic or terminal illnesses. The special health care con-cerns of aging prisoners also urgently need to be addressed.

MENTAL HEALTH

Among the consequences of deinstitutional-ization of state mental hospitals in the early 1970s was the release of thousands of individ-uals with severe mental illness into community settings (Bachrach, 1980). Subsequently, home-lessness of the seriously mentally ill and use of illegal substances have led to increased arrests. An estimated 200,000 or 7.2 percent of individ-uals in prison settings have severe mental dis-orders (Torrey, Nobel, & Flynn, 1992). In addi-tion, a substantial number of incarcerated individuals have mental health disorders that have not been diagnosed or treated.

FAMILY ISSUES

Prisoners describe their inability to be involved in the daily lives of their children and other loved ones as a source of great psycho-logical stress and pain (Lanier, 1993). Common problems of everyday living—death of a par-ent or child, divorce, or chronic illness—are all exacerbated when natural support systems and family functioning are disrupted by incar-ceration. Approximately 70 percent of females incarcerated lived with their minor children prior to incarceration. In about one-third of the cases, child protective services and other agen-cies are involved in the out-of-home place-ment of children (Versay, 1998). Studies show that incarcerated individuals who maintain strong family and friendship ties during imprisonment and assume responsible marital

(3)

and parental roles on release have lower recidivism rates (Hairston, 1988). Current trends of moving prisoners to other states due to overcrowding create further cutoffs of fam-ily continuity and connectedness. Social work-ers have the knowledge and skills in this area to develop and advocate for these necessary family programs as well as provide supportive services to individual inmates during their incarceration.

Privatization

The concept of prison privatization has given rise to a wide debate. Proponents argue that private contractors can build prisons faster and operate more efficiently without encum-brances of bureaucracy. In order to safeguard the interests of society and the rights of indi-viduals, the government must retain responsi-bility for the direct provision of programs for the incarceration and rehabilitation of offend-ers. There are currently more than 30,000 inmates in private facilities. Development of standards and continued research are neces-sary to ensure that the interests of society are protected and responsible care and rehabilita-tion occur.

INCARCERATED WOMEN

Female prisoners present a range of situa-tions needing intervention. The majority of women booked into jails have at least one issue such as substance abuse, pregnancy, or health, responsibility for minor children, self-esteem, or history of physical or sexual abuse. Since jails tend to be designed for the male population without regard for the differences in the sexes, increased stress is likely for women (Versay, 1998). Social workers can assist in the adapta-tion of the correcadapta-tional system to more effec-tively manage issues related to the increasing number of women being incarcerated.

YOUTHFUL OFFENDERS

The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 required juveniles to be housed separate from adults. Many states,

however, are moving toward treating juvenile offenders as adults. This leads to the housing of youthful offenders with the adult popula-tion (Schiraldi & Soler, 1998). The trend toward incarceration of juveniles within the adult jail population needs special considera-tion. Vulnerability to exploitation and abuse is high for these youth. Exposure to individuals with more extensive criminal backgrounds may assist in developing a pattern of incarcer-ation rather than preventing further legal involvement. The role of social workers within the juvenile justice system can work toward appropriate options for youths convicted of crimes.

ISSUE STATEMENT

Social workers trained in the corrections field are uniquely qualified to provide services addressing all of the problem areas. In fact, social workers fill the majority of clinical posi-tions in the detention and correcposi-tions field (Otero, McNally, & Powitzky, 1981). Yet little has been written about delivery of services in this field, and schools of social work rarely address correction and criminal justice. Incarceration deserves social work attention because the offender is in need of counseling, treatment, deprogramming, and education during the time served. The functioning of the incarcerated person’s family is affected as well, resulting in economic burdens, stigma, emo-tional distress, and increased risk of children to commit crimes (Rowe & Farrington, 1997), which also cause difficulties for inmates, their families, and society as a whole. With 1.6 mil-lion people incarcerated, social workers must become involved in corrections and rehabilita-tion as advocates and treatment providers for this vulnerable population.

Several specific areas are pertinent to the domain of social work. Our mission of promot-ing social functionpromot-ing requires us to examine some of the following:

■ safe and humane environments that protect the public, provide cost-effective services, and are responsive to the needs of the community

■ the role of social work within the criminal justice system

(4)

■ integration of social work services within the framework of the criminal justice system

■ prevalence of substance abuse and mental health issues within the criminal justice system

■ trends toward incarceration and manda-tory sentencing instead of the provision of community-based treatment

■ the biopsychosocial needs of all incarcer-ated individuals.

POLICY STATEMENT

Over 1.6 million people are currently incar-cerated in the United States, and the number continues to grow. These individuals bring with them a myriad of social, economic, health, men-tal health, and addiction problems. Providing services to these individuals has created an ever-expanding need for social work services. NASW recognizes the importance of providing quality social work interventions to incarcer-ated individuals. Adequate services provision could reduce rates of recidivism and incarcera-tion for the betterment of the individual as well as society as a whole. Therefore, advocating the following principles is recommended:

■ People of color are disproportionately rep-resented in the population of those incarcer-ated. With this in mind, ongoing advocacy from the wide range of policy initiatives that affect this issue is imperative.

■ The role of social work within the correc-tional setting includes the provision of appro-priate treatment that is sensitive to the needs of the offender as well as the community at risk. As the numbers of persons incarcerated increases, so must the availability of social work services within the correctional system.

■ The social work profession must advocate for safe, humane, and equitable treatment of all individuals in prisons and jails, including ces-sation of sexual abuse and sexual harassment and differential sentencing and treatment.

■ Because of prevalence of physical and men-tal health and alcohol and other drug addiction problems, social workers must advocate for access to health care, medications, treatment, and support.

■ Social workers in correctional settings should receive specialized training on the unique application of social work values and skills in the correctional setting. Practice stan-dards for social work must be developed. Bilingual social workers should provide ser-vices in the areas of health, mental health, and rehabilitation for cultural affirmation to better serve the population.

■ The social work profession must take an active role in national policy debates on crimi-nal justice, corrections, and prisons, collaborat-ing with such organizations as the Federal Bureau of Prisons, the National Association of Blacks in Criminal Justice, and the American Correctional and Juvenile Officers Associations.

■ The social work profession should engage in research to (1) identify effective approaches such as alternative dispute resolution, includ-ing alternatives to prison or jail terms; and (2) evaluate effectiveness of treatment interven-tions in correctional settings.

■ The social work profession must advocate to ensure humane treatment and adequate nutri-tion, health care, and rehabilitation programs. Standards for treatment and rehabilitation to govern both public and private facilities are needed.

■ Prevention efforts including screening and treatment for alcohol and chemical depen-dency, education regarding sexually transmit-ted and blood and air borne disease and confi-dential testing, family violence prevention and treatment services, and counseling services must be instituted.

■ Funding for community-based options must be maximized in order to prevent and treat problems such as alcohol and substance addictions and serious mental illness prior to involvement in the criminal justice system.

REFERENCES

Bachrach, L. (1980). Overview: Model programs for chronic mental patients. American Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 1023–1031.

Egan, T. (1999, June 10). In states: Anti-drug fight: A renewal for treatment. The New York Times.

(5)

Franklin, H. (1998, February 22). Judgment in our jails. Washington Post, pp. 9, 14.

Hairston, C. (1988). Family ties during impris-onment: Do they influence future criminal activity? Federal Probation, 52, 48–52.

Kupers, T. (1999). Prison madness: The mental health crisis behind bars and what we must do about it. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Lanier, C. (1993). Affective states of fathers in prison. Justice Quarterly, 10, 49–65.

McNeece, C. A., & Roberts, A. (1996). Policy and practice in the justice system. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

Miller, J. G. (1995). Criminal justice: Social work roles. In R. L. Edwards (Ed.-in-Chief), Encyclopedia of social work (19th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 653–659). Washington, DC: NASW Press.

Morris, S. M., & Steadman, H. J. (1994). H. J. Keys to successfully diverting mentally ill jail detainees. American Jails, July/August, 47–49.

Otero, R., McNally, D., & Powitzky, R. (1981). Mental health services in adult correctional systems. Corrections Today, 43, 8–18.

Roberts, A. R. (1997). Social work in juvenile and criminal justice settings. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.

Rowe, D., & Farrington, D. (1997). The familial transmission of criminal convictions. Criminology, 35, 177–183.

Schiraldi, V., & Soler, M. (1998). The will of the people: The public’s opinion of the Violent and Repeat Juvenile Offender Act of 1997. Washington, DC: Youth Law Center/ Justice Policy Institute.

Singer, M., Bussey, J., Song, L., & Lunghofer, L. (1995). The psychosocial issues of women serving time in jail. Social Work, 40, 103–113. Torrey, E. F., Nobel, J. H., & Flynn, L. M. (1992). Criminalizing the seriously mentally ill: The abuse of jails as mental hospitals. Washington, DC: National Alliance for the Mentally Ill and the Public Citizens Health Research Group.

U.S. Department of Justice. (1996). Bureau of justice statistics sourcebook. Washington, DC: Author.

Versay, B. (1998). Specific needs of women diagnosed with mental illness in U.S. jails. In B. L. Levin, A. K. Blanch, & Jennings, A. (Eds.), Women’s mental health services (pp. 368–389). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Policy statement approved by the NASW Delegate Assembly, August 1999. For further information, contact the National Association of Social Workers, 750 First Street, NE, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20002-4241. Telephone: 202-408-8600; e-mail: press@naswdc.org

References

Related documents

Description: Percent of patients aged 18 years and older undergoing cardiac surgery whose prophylactic antibiotics were ordered to be discontinued OR were discontinued within 48

First, section 3 provides evidence on the importance of liquidity constraints affecting consumption levels in developing countries and thus gives indirect support to the notion

Next, for each galaxy, we modeled the full galaxy-wide Chandra plus NuSTAR spectrum using the two thermal components ( with temperatures fi xed at the previous best- fi t values ) plus

The results of the patient oriented intervention studies were consistent with those of the Cochrane review on lay led self management support programmes, which found no evidence

Now that we have the posterior description defined up to a constant and we have a proposal Markov chain, then we need the test function to see if we accept or rejected the

directions to ensure the results do not depend on the position within the magnet (a process called diffusion tensor imaging), measurements in the spinal cord can be acquired only

We examine the nature of business cycles correlation trying to disentangle between regional spillover e ffects (expansion and reces- sion phases among the ASEAN-5 are correlated)