• No results found

Lecture 10: Dispersion Trading

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Lecture 10: Dispersion Trading"

Copied!
41
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Lecture 10:

Dispersion Trading

Marco Avellaneda

G63.2936.001

Spring Semester 2009

(2)

What is dispersion trading?

• Dispersion trading refers to trades in which one

-- sells index options and buys options

on the index components, or

-- buys index options and sells options on the index components

• All trades are delta-neutral (hedged with stock)

• The package is maintained delta-neutral over the horizon of the trade

Dispersion trading:

-- selling index volatility and buying volatility of the index components

-- buying index volatility and selling volatility on the index components

(3)

Why Dispersion Trading?

Motivation: to profit from price differences in volatility markets

using index options and options on individual stocks

Opportunities: Market segmentation, temporary shifts in correlations

between assets, idiosyncratic news on individual stocks

(4)

Index Arbitrage versus Dispersion

Trading

Stock 1

Index

Stock N

Stock 3

Stock 2

*

*

*

*

Index Arbitrage:

Reconstruct

an index or ETF

using the

component stocks

Dispersion Trading:

Reconstruct an index

option

using

options

on the

component stocks

(5)

Main U.S. indices and sectors

Major Indices

: SPX, DJX, NDX

SPY, DIA, QQQQ (Exchange-Traded Funds)

Sector Indices

:

Semiconductors: SMH, SOX

Biotech: BBH, BTK

Pharmaceuticals: PPH, DRG

Financials: BKX, XBD, XLF, RKH

Oil & Gas: XNG, XOI, OSX

High Tech, WWW, Boxes: MSH, HHH, XBD, XCI

Retail: RTH

(6)

ij

j

ij

i

j

i

I

ij

j

j

i

i

j

i

n

i

i

i

i

I

i

i

i

n

i

i

i

i

n

i

i

i

i

i

n

i

i

i

i

n

i

i

i

p

p

S

dS

S

dS

Cov

p

p

S

dS

p

Var

I

dI

Var

I

S

w

p

S

dS

p

S

dS

I

S

w

dS

w

I

I

dI

w

S

w

I

ρ

σ

σ

σ

σ

=





=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

,

1

index

in

shares

of

number

2

1

2

1

1

1

1

Intuition…

Fair value relation for

volatilities assuming a

given correlation matrix

(7)

The trade in pictures

Index

Stock 1

Stock 2

Sell index call

Buy calls on different stocks.

(8)

Profit-loss scenarios for a

dispersion trade in a single day

-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 stock # s ta n d a rd m o v e -3 -2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 stock # s ta n d a rd m o v e

Scenario 1

Scenario 2

Stock P/L: - 2.30

Index P/L: - 0.01

Total P/L: - 2.41

Stock P/L: +9.41

Index P/L: - 0.22

Total P/L: +9.18

(9)

(

)

(

)

(

,

,

)

(

,

,

)

0

,

max

0

,

max

1

1

1

T

K

S

C

w

T

K

I

C

K

S

w

K

I

K

w

K

i

i

i

M

j

i

I

i

i

M

j

i

i

M

j

i

=

=

=

=

First approximation to the dispersion

package: ``Intrinsic Value Hedge’’

'

``divisor'

by

scaled

shares,

of

number

1

=

=

=

i

i

M

i

i

S

w

w

I

IVH:

premium from index

is less than premium

from components

“Super-replication”

Makes sense for

deep--in-the-money options

IVH: use index

weights for option

hedge

(10)

Intrinsic-Value Hedging is `exact’ only if

stocks are perfectly correlated

( )

( )

( )

(

I

T

K

)

w

(

S

( )

T

K

)

T

e

F

K

e

F

w

K

X

N

N

e

F

w

T

S

w

T

I

M

i

i

i

i

T

X

i

i

T

X

i

M

i

i

i

ij

T

N

i

M

i

i

i

M

i

i

i i i i i i i

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

0

,

max

0

,

max

:

Set

:

in

for

Solve

normal

ed

standardiz

1

1

2

1

2

1

1

2

1

1

1

2 2 2

σ

σ

σ

σ

σ

σ

ρ

Similar to

Jamshidian (1989)

for pricing bond

options in 1-factor

model

(11)

IVH : Hedge with ``equal-delta’’

options

( )

constant

tas

Del

constant

moneyness

-log

constant

N

2

1

ln

1

2

1

ln

1

2

2

2

1

2

=

=





=

+





=

=

d

d

T

K

F

T

X

T

F

K

T

X

e

F

K

i

i

i

i

i

i

i

i

T

T

X

i

i

i i

σ

σ

σ

σ

σ

σ

(12)

What happens after you enter an

option trade ?

€ 0 € 5 € 10 € 15 € 20 € 25 € 30 € 35 € 70 € 75 € 80 € 85 € 90 € 95 € 100 € 105 € 110 € 115 € 120 € 125 € 130 -€ 1 € 0 € 1 € 2 € 3 € 4 € 5 € 6 € 7 € 70 € 75 € 80 € 85 € 90 € 95 € 100 € 105 € 110 € 115 € 120 € 125 € 130

Unhedged call option

Hedged option

Profit-loss for a hedged single option position (Black –Scholes)

(

)

σ

σ

σ

θ

σ

σ

θ

=

=

=

=

+

C

NV

t

S

S

n

d

NV

n

L

P

Vega

normalized

,

(dollars),

decay

time

1

/

2

n ~ standardized move

(13)

Gamma P/L for an Index Option

(

)

(

)

(

)

1

Index P/L

1

Gamma P/L

Index

2

2

1

2

2

2

1

2

1

1

2

ij

j

i

j

i

I

j

i

j

i

I

i

M

i

I

i

i

I

ij

j

i

j

M

ij

i

I

M

j

j

j

i

i

i

i

M

i

I

i

i

I

I

I

n

n

p

p

n

p

p

p

S

w

S

w

p

n

p

n

n

ρ

σ

σ

σ

θ

σ

σ

θ

ρ

σ

σ

σ

σ

σ

θ

+

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

Assume

d

σ

=

0

(14)

Gamma P/L for Dispersion

Trade

(

)

(

)

(

i

j

ij

)

j

i

I

j

i

j

i

I

i

M

i

I

I

i

i

i

i

i

n

n

p

p

n

p

n

ρ

σ

σ

σ

θ

θ

σ

σ

θ

θ

+





+

=

2

2

1

2

2

2

2

th

1

P/L

Trade

Dispersion

1

stock P/L

i

diagonal term:

realized single-stock

movements vs.

implied volatilities

off-diagonal term:

realized cross-market

movements vs.

implied correlation

(15)

Dispersion Statistic

(

)

(

) (

)

Θ





+

=

Θ

+

+

=

+

Θ

Θ

+

=

+

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

1

2

1

2

1

2

2

2

1

2

2

1

2

2

2

2

1

2

1

1

P/L

,

D

n

n

p

n

n

p

n

p

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

p

D

I

I

Y

S

S

X

Y

X

p

D

I

I

i

N

i

i

I

i

i

i

I

I

I

N

i

i

i

i

I

I

N

i

i

i

i

I

I

N

i

i

i

I

N

i

i

I

I

N

i

i

i

I

I

i

N

i

i

I

I

N

i

i

i

i

i

i

i

i

N

i

i

σ

θ

θ

σ

σ

θ

θ

σ

σ

θ

σ

σ

θ

θ

θ

θ

θ

θ

θ

θ

σ

σ

(16)

Summary of Gamma P/L for

Dispersion Trade

Θ





+

=

=

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

Gamma P/L

p

n

n

D

I

I

i

N

i

i

I

i

i

i

I

σ

θ

θ

σ

σ

θ

“Idiosyncratic”

Gamma

Dispersion

Gamma

Time-Decay

Example: ``Pure long dispersion” (zero idiosyncratic Gamma):

0

1

1

2 2 2 2 2 2

>

=

Θ

=

I i i i I I i i i I I i i I i

p

p

p

σ

σ

θ

σ

σ

θ

σ

σ

θ

θ

(17)

7 0 7 5 8 0 8 5 9 0 9 5 1 0 0 1 0 5 1 1 0 1 1 5 1 2 0 1 2 5 1 3 0 70 80 90 100 110 120 130

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 70 8 0 90 10 0 110 120 130

0

5

10

15

20

25

Payoff function for a trade

with short index/long

options (IVH), 2 stocks

Value function (B&S) for the

IVH position as a function of

stock prices (2 stocks)

In general: short index IVH

is short-Gamma along the

diagonal, long-Gamma for

``transversal’’ moves

(18)

5.80

10.31

20.49

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

-6.80

+7.88

-2.29

+10.84

Gamma Risk: Negative exposure for ‘parallel’ shifts, positive

‘exposure’ to transverse shifts

5

.

%

40

%

30

12

2

1

=

=

=

ρ

σ

σ

(19)

-0

.1

5

-0

.0

8

-0

.0

1

0

.0

6

0

.1

3

1

.2

1

0

.3

0

.0

7

0

.0

1

2

0

-1.E+06

-1.E+06

-8.E+05

-6.E+05

-4.E+05

-2.E+05

0.E+00

2.E+05

4.E+05

6.E+05

8.E+05

1.E+06

i

n

d

e

x

norma lize d

dispe rsion

Gamma-Risk for Baskets

D= Dispersion, or cross-sectional move,

D/(Y*Y)= Normalized Dispersion

(

)

(

)

2

1

2

2

1

1

/

/

=

=

=

=

=

=

N

i

i

i

N

i

i

i

i

i

i

Y

X

p

Y

D

Y

X

p

D

I

I

Y

S

S

X

(20)

Vega Risk

Sensitivity to volatility: perturb all single-stock implied volatilities

by the same percent amount

( )

( )

( ) ( )

σ

σ

σ

σ

σ

σ

σ

σ

σ

σ

=

=

+

=

+

=

+

=

=

=

=

V

NV

NV

NV

NV

NV

I

M

j

j

I

I

I

j

j

M

j

j

I

I

j

M

j

j

vega

normalized

Vega

Vega

Vega P/L

1

1

1

(21)

Market/Volatility Risk

7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % 1 1 0 % 1 2 0 % 1 3 0 % 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 vol % multiplier m a rk e t le v e l 7 0 % 85% 100 % 1 1 5 % 1 3 0 % 7 0 7 5 8 0 8 5 9 0 9 5 1 0 0 1 0 5 1 1 0 1 1 5 1 2 0 1 2 5 1 3 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Vol % multipler Market level

 Short Gamma on a perfectly correlated move

(22)

``Rega’’: Sensitivity to correlation

( ) ( )

[

]

( ) ( )

( )

( ) ( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

I I I I I I I I I I I I I j M j j I j M j j I I I I j i j j i i ij j i j M ij i I ij ij

NV

NV

p

p

p

p

p

p

j

i

×

=

=

=

=

=

=

+

+

= = ≠ = 2 2 0 2 1 2 2 ) 0 ( 2 ) 1 ( 2 2 ) 0 ( 2 ) 1 ( 2 1 2 ) 0 ( 1 ) 1 ( 2 ) 0 ( 2 ) 1 ( 2 1 2

2

1

ega

R

2

1

P/L

n

Correlatio

2

1

,

,

σ

σ

σ

ρ

σ

σ

σ

ρ

σ

σ

σ

σ

σ

σ

σ

σ

σ

ρ

σ

σ

σ

ρ

σ

σ

ρ

σ

σ

σ

ρ

ρ

ρ

(23)

Market/Correlation Sensitivity

-0 .3 -0 .2 -0 .1 0 0 .1 0 .2 0 .3 70 90 110 130 0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2 4.5 4.8 5.1 corr change market level -0 .3 -0 .2 -0 .1 0 0 .1 0 .2 0 .3 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 corr change market level

 Short Gamma on a perfectly correlated move

(24)

A model for dispersion trading

signals (taking into account volatility skews)

• Given an index (DJX, SPX, NDX) construct a proxy for the index with

small residual.

)

regression

(multiple

1

ε

β

+

=

=

k

k

m

k

k

S

dS

I

dI

• Alternatively, truncate at a given capitalization level and keep the

original weights, modeling the remainder as a stock w/o options.

• Build a Weighted Monte Carlo simulation for the dynamics of the m stocks

and value the index options with the model

• Compare the model values with the bid/offer values for the index options

traded in the market.

(25)

Morgan Stanley High-Technology 35

Index (MSH)

ADP

JDSU

AMAT

JNPR

AMZN

LU

AOL

MOT

BRCM

MSFT

CA

MU

CPQ

NT

CSCO

ORCL

DELL

PALM

EDS

PMTC

EMC

PSFT

ERTS

SLR

FDC

STM

HWP

SUNW

IBM

TLAB

INTC

TXN

INTU

XLNX

YHOO

35 Underlying Stocks

 Equal-dollar weighted index, adjusted

annually

Each stock has typically O(30) options

(26)

Test problem: 35 tech stocks

Number of constraints

: 876

Number of paths

: 10,000 to 30,000 paths

Optimization technique

: Quasi-Newton method (explicit

gradient)

(27)

ZQN AC-E AMZN 1/20/01 15 Call 0 4.125 4.375 13 3058 16.6875 12/20/00 ZQN AT-E AMZN 1/20/01 16.75 Call 0 3.125 3.375 0 1312 16.6875 12/20/00 ZQN AO-E AMZN 1/20/01 17.5 Call 0 2.875 3.25 20 10 16.6875 12/20/00 ZQN AU-E AMZN 1/20/01 18.375 Call 0 2.625 2.875 10 338 16.6875 12/20/00 ZQN AD-E AMZN 1/20/01 20 Call 0 1.9375 2.125 223 5568 16.6875 12/20/00 ZQN BC-E AMZN 2/17/01 15 Call 0 5.125 5.625 30 1022 16.6875 12/20/00

ZQN BO-E AMZN 2/17/01 17.5 Call 0 4 4.375 0 0 16.6875 12/20/00

ZQN BD-E AMZN 2/17/01 20 Call 0 3.125 3.5 10 150 16.6875 12/20/00 ZQN DC-E AMZN 4/21/01 15 Call 0 5.875 6.375 0 639 16.6875 12/20/00 ZQN DO-E AMZN 4/21/01 17.5 Call 0 5 5.375 0 168 16.6875 12/20/00 ZQN DD-E AMZN 4/21/01 20 Call 0 3.875 4.125 5 1877 16.6875 12/20/00 ZQN DS-E AMZN 4/21/01 22.5 Call 0 3.125 3.375 20 341 16.6875 12/20/00 ZQN GC-E AMZN 7/21/01 15 Call 0 6.875 7.375 0 134 16.6875 12/20/00 ZQN GO-E AMZN 7/21/01 17.5 Call 0 5.625 6.125 0 63 16.6875 12/20/00 ZQN GD-E AMZN 7/21/01 20 Call 0 4.875 5.25 5 125 16.6875 12/20/00 ZQN GS-E AMZN 7/21/01 22.5 Call 0 4.125 4.5 0 180 16.6875 12/20/00 ZQN GE-E AMZN 7/21/01 25 Call 0 3.5 3.875 65 79 16.6875 12/20/00

AOE AZ-E AOL 1/20/01 32.5 Call 0 6.6 7 20 1972 37.25 12/20/00

AOE AO-E AOL 1/20/01 33.75 Call 0 5.6 6 0 596 37.25 12/20/00

AOE AG-E AOL 1/20/01 35 Call 0 4.7 5.1 153 5733 37.25 12/20/00

AOE AU-E AOL 1/20/01 37.5 Call 0 3.4 3.7 131 3862 37.25 12/20/00 AOE AH-E AOL 1/20/01 40 Call 0 2.5 2.7 1229 19951 37.25 12/20/00

AOE AR-E AOL 1/20/01 41.25 Call 0 2 2.3 6 1271 37.25 12/20/00

AOE AV-E AOL 1/20/01 42.5 Call 0 1.65 1.85 219 4423 37.25 12/20/00 AOE AS-E AOL 1/20/01 43.75 Call 0 1.3 1.5 44 3692 37.25 12/20/00 AOE AI-E AOL 1/20/01 45 Call 0 1.2 1.25 817 11232 37.25 12/20/00

AOE BZ-E AOL 2/17/01 32.5 Call 0 7 7.4 0 0 37.25 12/20/00

AOE BG-E AOL 2/17/01 35 Call 0 5.4 5.8 31 4 37.25 12/20/00

AOE BU-E AOL 2/17/01 37.5 Call 0 4.1 4.5 0 0 37.25 12/20/00

AOE BH-E AOL 2/17/01 40 Call 0 3.1 3.4 299 48 37.25 12/20/00

AOE BV-E AOL 2/17/01 42.5 Call 0 2.15 2.45 191 266 37.25 12/20/00 AOE BI-E AOL 2/17/01 45 Call 0 1.55 1.75 235 1385 37.25 12/20/00

AOE DZ-E AOL 4/21/01 32.5 Call 0 8.4 8.8 16 10 37.25 12/20/00

AOE DG-E AOL 4/21/01 35 Call 0 6.9 7.3 32 179 37.25 12/20/00

AOE DU-E AOL 4/21/01 37.5 Call 0 5.5 5.9 36 200 37.25 12/20/00

AOE DH-E AOL 4/21/01 40 Call 0 4.5 4.9 264 2164 37.25 12/20/00

AOE DV-E AOL 4/21/01 42.5 Call 0 3.6 3.9 209 632 37.25 12/20/00

AOE DI-E AOL 4/21/01 45 Call 0 2.9 3.1 415 3384 37.25 12/20/00

AOE DW-E AOL 4/21/01 47.5 Call 0 2.15 2.45 37 1174 37.25 12/20/00 AOO DJ-E AOL 4/21/01 50 Call 0 1.75 1.95 224 7856 37.25 12/20/00

AOE GZ-E AOL 7/21/01 32.5 Call 0 9.4 9.8 0 0 37.25 12/20/00

OptionNameStockT ickerExpDate Strike Type Intrinsic Bid Ask Volume OpenInterestStockPriceQuoteDate

Fragment of data for

(28)

Near-month options

(Pricing Date: Dec 2000)

MSH Basket option: model vs. market

Front Month

60

62

64

66

68

70

72

74

76

78

80

600 610 620 630 640 650 660 670 680 690 700

strike

im

p

li

e

d

v

o

l

model

midmarket

bid

offer

(29)

Second-month options

Basket option: model vs. market

50

52

54

56

58

60

62

64

66

68

70

600

620

640

660

680

700

strike

im

p

li

e

d

v

o

l

model

midm arket

bid

offer

(30)

Third-month options

Basket option: model vs. market

45

50

55

60

65

70

600

640

680

720

760

strike

im

p

li

e

d

v

o

l

model

midm arket

bid

offer

(31)

Six-month options

Basket option: model vs. market

35

40

45

50

55

60

600

640

680

720

760

840

strike

im

p

li

e

d

v

o

l

model

midmarket

bid

offer

(32)

Skew Graph

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

500

510

520

530

540

550

555

560

565

570

580

Strike Price

V

o

la

ti

li

ty

----

Bid Price

---- Ask Price

----

Model Fair Value

Broad Market Index Options (OEX)

(33)

Hedging

• Covering the ``wings’’ in every name implies an excess Vega risk.

Intrinsic Value Hedge implies long Volatility

• Use the WMC sensitivity method (regressions) to determine the best

single co-terminal option to use for each component.

• Implement a Theta-Neutral hedge using the most important names with

the corresponding Betas.

(34)

Simulation for OEX Group:

$10MM/ Targeting 1% daily stdev

Constant-VaR portfolio (1% stdev per day)

Capital is allocated evenly among signals

Transaction costs in options/ stock trading included

SIGNALSTRENGTH > threshold

1080 trades

OEX

2001

2002

2003 2001-2003

turnover time

60 days

annualized return

$4,239,794

$3,029,015

$1,339,717

$2,966,986

percentage

42.40

30.29

13.40

29.67

(35)

Dispersion OEX (return on $100)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

c-00

ju

il-01

vr

-0

2

ao

ût

-0

2

m

ar

s-

03

se

pt

-0

3

av

r-0

4

$

-r

e

tu

rn

signal

realized

Results of Back-testing

(36)

signal >threshold

trades 296

QQQ

2001

2002

2003 2001-2003

turnover time

76

annualized return

-$1,369,462 $1,078,541 $5,339,452 $1,533,241

percentage

-13.69

10.79

53.39

15.33

Sharpe Ratio

-0.91

0.72

3.56

1.02

Simulation for QQQ group

(37)

QQQ, return on $100

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

sept-01

déc-01

avr-02

juil-02

oct-02

janv-03

mai-03

août-03

nov-03 mars-04

$

-r

e

tu

rn

signal

realized

(38)

QQQ; number of signals

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

m

ai

-0

1

ju

il-01

se

pt

-0

1

no

v-01

ja

nv

-0

2

vr

-0

3

av

r-0

2

ju

in

-0

2

ao

ût

-0

2

oc

t-0

2

c-02

vr

-0

3

av

r-0

3

ju

in

-0

3

ao

ût

-0

3

oc

t-0

3

s

ig

n

a

ls

p

e

r

d

a

y

QQQ

(39)

QQQ + OEX

2001

2002

2003

2001-2003

turnover time

65

annualized return

$3 054 673 $2 878 561

$2 264 803 $2 672 645

percentage

30.5

28.8

22.6

26.7

Sharpe Ratio

1.9

1.8

1.4

1.7

Simulation for QQQ+OEX

$10MM with 1% daily stdev

(40)

OEX + QQQ, return on $100

0.00

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00

120.00

vr

-0

1

se

pt

-0

1

av

r-0

2

oc

t-0

2

m

ai

-0

3

no

v-03

ju

in

-0

4

$

-r

e

tu

rn

signal

realized

(41)

Dispersion Capacity Estimate

USD 10 MM ~ 100 OEX contracts per day

If we assume 1000 contracts to be a liquidity

limit, capacity is 100 MM just for OEX

Capacity is probably around 200 MM

if we use sectors and Europe

Dispersion has higher Sharpe Ratio:

It is an arb strategy based on waiting for

profit opportunities

References

Related documents

atrophaeus demonstrated a greater resistance to extreme space conditions such as desiccation, UV-radiation and vacuum compared to Hvr. Their increased

Compliance with federal, State and local regulations, combined with proposed General Plan policies outlined below, would reduce the potential for a significant adverse effect on

One point of emphasis when advising financial service- providers is the implementation of ongoing responsibilities in the field of compliance, money laundering and fraud prevention,

However, it is interesting to obtai of “true” colors that collapse to a single color same exterior conditions and sensor param purpose a numerical experiment has b Calculating

Slowly add 5ml of MEF Cell Culture Medium drop-wise to cells in the 15ml conical tube.. While adding the medium, gently move the tube back and forth to mix the

How often does the internal economic environment (financial resources available to the various efforts pursued of the church or organization) surrounding a Christian leader

In this paper, we report the extraction and fractionation of sirih merah (Indonesian red betel), Piper crocatum Ruiz & Pav., from West Sumatra, Indonesia, based on the polarity

Security Health Plan offers Medication Therapy Management (MTM) services to all Medicare Advantage plan members with Part D Coverage at no additional charge.  The services