• No results found

Effective Power/Ground Plane Decoupling for PCB

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Effective Power/Ground Plane Decoupling for PCB"

Copied!
104
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Effective Power/Ground

Plane Decoupling for PCB

Dr. Bruce Archambeault

IBM Distinguished Engineer

IEEE Fellow

IBM

Research Triangle Park, NC

[email protected]

(2)

“Ground

Bounce”

(3)

Power/Ground-Reference Plane Noise

• Must consider TWO Major Factors

– EMC -- Reduce noise along edge of board from IC

somewhere else

– Functionality -- Provide IC with sufficient charge

• Decoupling strategies are FULL of

Myths

– Consider the physics

(4)

Source of Power/Ground-Reference

Plane Noise

• Power requirements from IC during

switching

(5)

Power Bus Spectrum

(6)

Noise Injected between Planes Due

to Critical Net Through Via

Signal Via

I/O Pin/Via

30 cm

20 cm

(7)

Transfer Function from Via to I/O Pin

Transfer Function From Via-to-Via 20x30cm Board -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 Tr ans fe r Fun ct io n ( d B) 5 mil Seperation 10 mil Seperation 15 mil Seperation 25 mil Seperation 35 mil Seperation

(8)

Decoupling Must be Analyzed in

Different Ways for Different Functions

• EMC

– Resonance big concern

– Requires STEADY-STATE analysis

• Frequency Domain

– Transfer function analysis

• Eliminate noise along edge of board due to

ASIC/IC located far away

(9)

Decoupling Must be Analyzed in

Different Ways for Different

Functions

• Provide Charge to ASIC/IC

– Requires TRANSIENT analysis

– Charge will NOT travel from far corners of the

board fast enough

– Local decoupling capacitors dominate

– Impedance at ASIC/IC pins important

(10)

Steady-State Analysis

• Measurements and Simulations

• Test Board with Decoupling capacitors

every 1” square

(11)

5” 1” 9” 10” 1” 3” 11” 12” Figure 1

Test Board Ports

#1

#2

#3

#4

#5

#6

#7

#8

#9

#10

(12)

S21 Used for Decoupling “Goodness”

• Ratio of Power ‘out’ to power ‘in’

• Better Indicator of EMI noise transmission

across board

(13)

Measured S21 for 12" x 10" PC Board Between Power/Ground Planes with No Decoupling Capacitors

(Measured Center to Corner)

-80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 S21 (dB)

Board

Capacitance

Dominates

(14)

Test Board Decoupling Capacitor

Placement for 25 .01 uf Caps

Possible Cap

Location

Populated

Cap

(15)

Test Board Decoupling Capacitor

Placement for 51 .01 uf Caps

Possible Cap

Location

Populated

Cap

(16)

Measured S21 for 12" x 10" PC Board Between Power/Ground Planes with Various Amounts of Decoupling Capacitors

(Measured Center to Corner)

-100 -90 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0

0.0E+00 2.0E+08 4.0E+08 6.0E+08 8.0E+08 1.0E+09 1.2E+09 1.4E+09 1.6E+09 1.8E+09

Frequency (Hz) S21 (dB) No Caps 25 Caps 50 Caps 99 Caps

Measured S21 for 12" x 10" PC Board Between Power/Ground Planes with Various Amounts of Decoupling Capacitors

(Measured Center to Corner)

-100 -90 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0

0.0E+00 2.0E+08 4.0E+08 6.0E+08 8.0E+08 1.0E+09 1.2E+09 1.4E+09 1.6E+09 1.8E+09

Frequency (Hz) S21 (dB) No Caps 25 Caps 50 Caps 99 Caps

(17)

S21 Between Port #8 and Port #1 on Test Board

With Various Amounts of .01 uf Decoupling Capacitors

-60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 S21 (dB) No Caps 25 Caps 51 Caps 99 Caps

(18)

1.00E+6 1.00E+7 1.00E+8 1.00E+9 1.00E+10

Freq (Hz)

0.1

1

10

100

1000

10000

|Z| (Ohms)

0.01uF 22pF

0.01uF in parallel with 22pF

Cap Impedance

(19)

Test Board Decoupling Capacitor Placement

for 41 22pf Caps

(In Addition to 99 .01uf Caps)

Possible Cap

Location

Populated

Cap

(20)

S21 Between Port #8 and Port #1 on Test Board

With 99 .01 uf Decoupling Capacitors and Various Amounts of 22pf

Capacitors Added

-60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0

0.0E+00 2.0E+08 4.0E+08 6.0E+08 8.0E+08 1.0E+09 1.2E+09 1.4E+09 1.6E+09 1.8E+09

S21 (dB) 9 22pf Caps 17 22pf Caps 21 22pf Caps 33 22pf Caps 41 22pf Caps 99 22pf Caps 99 Caps

(21)

Measured Comparison of Multiple and Single Value

Decoupling Capacitor Strategies

-100 -90 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0

0.0E+00 2.0E+08 4.0E+08 6.0E+08 8.0E+08 1.0E+09 1.2E+09 1.4E+09 1.6E+09 1.8E+09

S21 Transfer Function (dB)

No Caps

99 0.01 uF Caps

(22)

Comparison of Model and Measured Data for 10" x 12" Board

99 caps -- alternating .01uF and 330pF

-100.0 -90.0 -80.0 -70.0 -60.0 -50.0 -40.0 -30.0 -20.0 -10.0 0.0

0.0E+00 1.0E+08 2.0E+08 3.0E+08 4.0E+08 5.0E+08 6.0E+08 7.0E+08 8.0E+08 9.0E+08 1.0E+09

S21 (dB)

CIAO - .01uF & 330 pF Measured

(23)

S21 Transfer Function for Different Value Capacitors Center-to-Corner 10" x 12" Board -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 S21 (dB) 99 .01uF caps 99 0.1uF caps 99 0.33uF caps

99 Caps (0.01uF and 330pF) 99 2nh shorts

(24)

Voltage Distribution @ 350 MHz

.01uF and 330pF Case

(Source in

(25)

Voltage Distribution @ 750 MHz

.01uF and 330pF Case

(Source in

(26)

Voltage Distribution @ 950 MHz

.01uF and 330pF Case

(Source in

(27)

Decoupling Capacitor Mounting

• Keep as to planes as close to capacitor

pads as possible

Height above Planes Via Separation

Inductance Depends

on Loop AREA

(28)

Decoupling Capacitor Mounting

• Keep as to planes as close to capacitor

pads as possible

Capacitor

IC

Capacitor Connection

Inductance Loop

IC Connection

Inductance Loop

(29)

Via Configuration Can Change

Inductance

Via Capacitor Pads SMT Capacitor

The “Good”

The “Bad”

The “Ugly”

Really “Ugly”

Better

Best

(30)

Comparison of Decoupling Capacitor Impedance 100 mil Between Vias & 10 mil to Planes

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

1.0E+06 1.0E+07 1.0E+08 1.0E+09 1.0E+10

Impedance (ohms)

1000pF 0.01uF 0.1uF 1.0uF

(31)

Via Seperation (mils)

Inductance (nH)

Impedance @ 1 GHz (ohms)

20 .06 .41

40 0.21 1.3

60 0.36 2.33

80 0.5 3.1

100 0.64

4.0

150 1.0 6.23

200 1.4

8.5

300 2.1 12.69

400 2.75 17.3

Comparison of Decoupling Capacitor

Via Separation Distance Effects

0.1 uF Capacitor

10 mils

(32)

Example Connection Inductance Values

2.07 nH 2.4 nH 4.3 nH 4.2 nH 0603 + 2*160mil 1.5 nH 2.1 nH 3.15 nH 3.3 nH 0603 + 2*100mil 0.8 nH 1.1 nH 1.74 nH 2.3 nH 0603 + 2*10mil 2.5 nH 3.5 nH 5.1 nH 5.1 nH 0805 + 2*160mil 2.0 nH 3 nH 4.3 nH 4.1 nH 0805 + 2*100mil 1.38 nH 2 nH 3.1 nH 3.0 nH 0805 + 2*10mil

Simple rect loop (10 mils to plane) Complex Formula

(10 mils to plane) Simple rect loop

(20 mils to plane) Complex Formula (20 mils to plane) Spacing between Vias

Fan, Jun, Wei Cui, James L. Drewniak, Thomas Van Doren, and James L. Knighten, “Estimating the Knighten, James L., Bruce Archambeault, Jun Fan, Samuel Connor, James L. Drewniak, “PDN Design

Strategies: II. Ceramic SMT Decoupling Capacitors – Does Location Matter?,” IEEE EMC

Society Newsletter, Issue No. x, Winter 2006, pp. 56-67. (www.emcs.org)

(33)

Transient Analysis

(Time Limited)

• Provide charge to ASIC/IC

• Inductance dominates impedance

– Loop area 1

st

order effect

• Traditional analysis not accurate

enough

(34)

switch

IC load

IC

driver

V

DC

GND

C

L

V

CC

Z

0

, v

p

GND

IC load

IC

driver

V

CC

V

CC

charge

logic 0-1

Z

0

, v

p

shoot-thru

current

IC load

IC

driver

GND

V

CC

0 V

discharge

logic 1-0

Z

0

, v

p

shoot-thru

current

Current in IC During Logic Transitions

(CMOS)

(35)

Typical PCB Power Delivery

GND

V

DC/DC converter

(Power source)

GND

V

CC

IC load

V

CC

GND

SMT capacitors

V

CC

GND

IC driver

GND

V

CC

electrolytic

capacitor

V

CC

GND

(36)

Equivalent Circuit for Power Current

Delivery to IC

switch

V

DC

L

trace

L

ps

L

bulk

C

bulk

L

via

C

SMT

C

planes

connector

and wiring

capacitor

leads

electrolytic

capacitors

via interconnect

SMT

capacitors

V

CC

/GND

plane

IC load

PCB

wiring

DC/DC

converter

(37)

Traditional Analysis #1

• Use impedance of capacitors in parallel

Impedance to IC

ESR

1

ESR

2

ESR

3

ESR

4

ESL

1

ESL

2

ESL

3

ESL

4

1uF

0. 1uF

0.01uF

.001uF

(38)

Traditional Impedance Calculation

for Four Decoupling Capacitor Values

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

1.00E+07 1.00E+08 1.00E+09

Impedance (ohms) .1uF .01uF .001uF .0001uF All in Parallel

(39)

Traditional Analysis #2

• Calculate loop area – Traditional loop

Inductance formulas

– Which loop area? Which size conductor

Impedance to IC

power/gnd pins

ESR

1

ESR

2

ESR

3

ESR

4

ESL

1

+L

d1

1uF

0. 1uF

0.01uF

.001uF

(40)

More Accurate Model Includes

Distributed Capacitance

Distributed capacitors Intentional Decoupling Capacitors

Distributed capacitors IC Power Pin

(41)

Distributed Capacitance

Schematic

Loop L

C

apacitance

ESR

Distributed Capacitance

Intentional

Capacitor

Source

Note: L increases

as distance from

source increases

Loop L

C

apacitance

ESR

Distributed Capacitance

Intentional

Capacitor

Source

Source

Note: L increases

as distance from

source increases

(42)

Effect of Distributed

Capacitance

• Can NOT be calculated/estimated using

traditional capacitance equation

• Displacement current amplitude changes

with position and distance from the source

(43)

Displacement Current

500 MHz via @450 mils from

Source

(44)

Need to Find the Real Effect of

Decoupling Capacitor Distance

• Perfect decoupling capacitor is a via

between planes

• FDTD simulation to find the effect of

shorting via distance from source

• Vary spacing between planes, distance

to via, frequency, etc

(45)

Impedance of Shorting Via vs. Frequency Four Via Case (20 mil Seperation Between Plates)

0.1 1 10 100 Impedance (ohms) 20mils 40mils 50mils 60mils 70mils 80mils 90mils 100mils 120mils 130mils 140mils 150mils 160mils 180mils 200mils 220mils 240mils 250mils 350mils 450mils

(46)

Impedance Result

• Linear with frequency (on log scale)

• Looks like an inductance only!

• Consider this inductance an Apparent

Inductance

• Apparent inductance is constant with

frequency

(47)

Apparent Inductance for One Shorting Via Case 20 mil Plate Separation

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Inductance (nH) 50mils 110mils 120mils 200mils 250mils 350mils 450mils

(48)

Formulas to Predict Apparent

Inductance

)

1592

.

0

2774

.

0

(

)

(

)

0403

.

0

1192

.

0

(

)

1763

.

0

2848

.

0

(

)

(

)

0447

.

0

1242

.

0

(

)

1943

.

0

2948

.

0

(

)

(

)

0492

.

0

1307

.

0

(

)

2675

.

0

2609

.

0

(

)

(

)

0654

.

0

1336

.

0

(

+

+

=

+

+

=

+

+

=

+

+

=

s

dist

Ln

s

L

s

dist

Ln

s

L

s

dist

Ln

s

L

s

dist

Ln

s

L

via

four

via

three

via

two

via

one

s = separation between plates (mils/10)

dist = distance to via

(49)

L

apparent

L

IC

L

cap

IC

Capacitor

Power

Gnd

L

apparent

ESR

L

cap

+

L

IC

Nominal

Source

(50)

Impedance Calculation with Apparent Inductance for Four Decoupling Capacitor Values

0.01 0.1 1 10

1.E+07 1.E+08 1.E+09

Impedance (ohms)

Case1 Case2 Case3

Traditional Calculation

Cap Value Distance to Cap from IC

Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 0.1 uF 800mils 1200mils 1500mils 0.01 uF 600mils 900mils 1100mils 0.001uF 400mils 700mils 800mils 0.0001uF 200mils 400mils 400mils

(51)

Effect of Distributed

Capacitance

• Can NOT be calculated/estimated using

traditional capacitance equation

• Displacement current amplitude changes with

position and distance from the source

• Following examples use cavity resonance

technique (EZ-PowerPlane)

– Frequency Domain to compare to measurements

– Time Domain using SPICE circuit from cavity

(52)

Parameters for Comparison to

Measurements

• Dielectric thickness = 35 mils

• Dielectric constant = 4.5, Loss tan = 0.02

• Copper conductivity = 5.8 e7 S/m

(53)

Measured vs Model (MoM) S21 for 12" x 10" PC Power/gnd with 25 .01uF caps

Position 8-to-1 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 S21 (dB) No Caps - Measured EZ-PP No Caps

(54)

Measured vs Model (EZ-PP) S21 for 12" x 10" PC Power/gnd with 25 .01uF caps

Position 8-to-1 -100.0 -90.0 -80.0 -70.0 -60.0 -50.0 -40.0 -30.0 -20.0 -10.0 0.0

1.0E+07 1.0E+08 1.0E+09 1.0E+10

S21 (dB)

Measured EZ-PP 25 caps

(55)

Measured vs Model (EZ-PP) S21 for 12" x 10" PC Power/gnd with 95 .01uF caps

Position 8-to-1 -100.0 -90.0 -80.0 -70.0 -60.0 -50.0 -40.0 -30.0 -20.0 -10.0 0.0 S21 (dB) 95 Caps - Measured 95 Caps - EZ-PP

(56)

Impedance at Port #1

Single 0.01 uF Capacitor at Various Distances (35mil Dielectric)

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 Im pedance (dB ohm s) no caps 300 mils 500 mils 700 mils 1000 mils

(57)

Z11 Phase Comparison as Capacitor distance Varies for 35 mils FR4 ESL = 0.5nH -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Phas e ( rad) 100 mils 200 mils 300 mils 400 mils 1000 mils 2000 mils

(58)

Impedance at Port #1

Single 0.01 uF Capacitor at Various Distances (10mil Dielectric)

-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 Im pedance ( d Bohms) no caps 300 mils 500 mils 700 mils 1000 mils

(59)

Cavity Resonance (EZ-PowerPlane)

Equivalent Circuit for HSPICE

L

ii

L

jj

L

ij

N

00i

N

01i

N

mni

N

mnj

N

01j

N

00j

C

0

C

0

C

0

G

00

G

01

G

mn

L

01

L

mn

Port i

Port j

Port

n

(60)

Impedance Comparison (EZ-PP vs HSPICE) at Port #1 Single 0.01 uF Capacitor at Various Distances (10mil Dielectric)

-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 Im pedance ( d Bohms) 300 mils 300 mils (HSPICE) 1000 mils 1000 mils (HSPICE)

(61)

Current Source Pulse for Simulated IC Power/GND 750 ps Rise/Fall -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 C u rrent (amps)

(62)

Time Domain Noise Voltage Across Simulated IC Power/GND Pin (1 amp) Single Capacitor (with 2 nH) at Various Distances (Fullwave Simulation)

-1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Level (vol ts )

750ps Rise, 35 mil planes,1uF @ 10mils 750ps Rise, 35 mil planes, 1uF @ 400mils 750ps Rise, 35 mil planes,1uF @ 800mils 750ps Rise, 35 mil planes,1uF @ 1200mils 750ps Rise, 35 mil planes,1uF @ 1600mils

(63)

Time Domain Current through Capacitor From Simulated IC Power/GND (1 amp) Single Capacitor (with 2nH) at Various Distances

-400 -350 -300 -250 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 C u rre n t (m illia mp s)

750ps Rise, 35 mil planes,1uF @ 10mils 750ps Rise, 35 mil planes,1uF @ 400mils 750ps Rise, 35 mil planes,1uF @ 800mils 750ps Rise, 35 mil planes,1uF @ 1200mils 750ps Rise, 35 mil planes,1uF @ 1600mils

(64)

Time Domain Noise Voltage Across Simulated IC Power/GND Pin (1 amp) Single Capacitor (with No L) at Various Distances

-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Level (vol ts )

750ps Rise, 35 mil planes,1uF @ 10mils 750ps Rise, 35 mil planes,1uF @ 400mils 750ps Rise, 35 mil planes,1uF @ 800mils 750ps Rise, 35 mil planes,1uF @ 1200mils 750ps Rise, 35 mil planes,1uF @ 1600mils

(65)

Time Domain Current through Capacitor From Simulated IC Power/GND (1 amp) Single Capacitor (with no L) at Various Distances

-1200 -1000 -800 -600 -400 -200 0 200 400 C u rre n t (m illia mp s)

750ps Rise, 35 mil planes,1uF @ 10mils 750ps Rise, 35 mil planes,1uF @ 10mils 750ps Rise, 35 mil planes,1uF @ 800mils 750ps Rise, 35 mil planes,1uF @ 1200mils 750ps Rise, 35 mil planes,1uF @ 1600mils

(66)

Time Domain Noise Voltage Across Simulated IC Power/GND Pin (1 amp) Single Capacitor with Various Capacitor Connection Inductance

-0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 Level (vol ts )

750ps Rise, 10 mil planes, 1uF @ 400mils 750ps Rise, 10 mil planes, (2nH) 1uF @ 400mils 750ps Rise, 10 mil planes, (1nH) 1uF @ 400mils

(67)

Time Domain Noise Voltage Across Simulated IC Power/GND Pin (1 amp) Single Capacitor with Various Capacitor Connection Inductance

-1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Level (vol ts )

750ps Rise, 10 mil planes, 1uF @ 400mils

750ps Rise, 10 mil planes, (2nH) 1uF @ 400mils 750ps Rise, 35 mil planes,1uF @ 400mils

(68)

Maximum Time Domain Noise Voltage Across Simulated IC Power/GND Pin Single Capacitor at Various Distances (Fullwave Simulation)

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800

Voltage (volts) 750 ps Rise, 10 mil planes,1uF, 2 nH

750 ps Rise, 10 mil planes,1uF, 1 nH 750 ps Rise, 10 mil planes,1uF, 0.5 nH 750 ps Rise, 10 mil planes,1uF, No L

(69)

Maximum Time Domain Noise Voltage Across Simulated IC Power/GND Pin Single Capacitor at Various Distances (Fullwave Simulation)

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

Voltage (volts) 1 ns Rise, 10 mil planes,1uF, 2 nH

1 ns Rise, 10 mil planes,1uF, 1 nH 1 ns Rise, 10 mil planes,1uF, 0.5 nH 1 ns Rise, 10 mil planes,1uF, No L

(70)

Maximum Time Domain Noise Voltage Across Simulated IC Power/GND Pin Single Capacitor at Various Distances (Fullwave Simulation)

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 Voltage (volts)

750 ps Rise, 35 mil planes,1uF, 2 nH 750 ps Rise, 35 mil planes,1uF, 1 nH 750 ps Rise, 35 mil planes,1uF, 0.5 nH 750 ps Rise, 35 mil planes,1uF, No L

(71)

Maximum Time Domain Noise Voltage Across Simulated IC Power/GND Pin Single Capacitor at Various Distances (Fullwave Simulation)

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 Voltage (volts)

1 ns Rise, 35 mil planes,1uF, 2 nH 1 ns Rise, 35 mil planes,1uF, No L 1 ns Rise, 35 mil planes,1uF, 0.5 nH 1 ns Rise, 35 mil planes,1uF, 1 nH

(72)

Maximum Voltage vs Distance to Capacitor for 1 ns Rise/fall time 0.01 uF Capacitor with 0.5 nH ESL and 30 mOhm ESR

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 M axi mum Vol tage at source ( vol ts ) 35 mil FR4 10 mil FR4 2 mil FR4 1 mil FR4 0.5 mil FR4

(73)

So Far……

• Frequency domain simulations not

optimum for charge delivery decoupling

calculations (phase not considered)

• Time domain simulations using single

pulse of current indicate limited capacitor

location effect

– Connection inductance of capacitor much

higher than inductance between planes

(74)

Charge Depletion

• IC draws charge from planes

• Capacitors will re-charge planes

(75)

Model for Plane Recharge

Investigations

Port2 Port2 (4,5) (4,5) Port1 Port1 (8,7) (8,7) a = 12 a = 12 b = 10 b = 10 d = 35 mil d = 35 mil Cdec Cdec (4.05,5) (4.05,5) Decoupling Capacitor : C = 1uF ESR = 30mOhm ESL = 0.5nH

5

.

4

=

r

ε

DC voltage used to DC voltage used to

charge the power

charge the power

plane plane Vdc Vdc I input I input Port3 Port3 (4,4.95) (4,4.95) Port2 Port2 (4,5) (4,5) Port1 Port1 (8,7) (8,7) a = 12 a = 12 b = 10 b = 10 d = 35 mil d = 35 mil Cdec Cdec (4.05,5) (4.05,5) Decoupling Capacitor : C = 1uF ESR = 30mOhm ESL = 0.5nH

5

.

4

=

r

ε

DC voltage used to DC voltage used to

charge the power

charge the power

plane plane Vdc Vdc I input I input Port3 Port3 (4,4.95) (4,4.95)

(76)

Charge Between Planes vs..

Charge Drawn by IC

Board total charge : C*V = 3.5nF*3.3V = 11nC

(77)
(78)

(a)

(b)

Noise Voltage from Inductive Effect

of Current Draw

Current pulses too small to see charge

depletion effects in this time scale

(79)

Charge Depletion Æ Voltage Drop

0

2

4

6

8

10

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

V

pl

an

e

[V

]

L

s

= 1nH

L

s

= 10 nH

L

s

= 50 nH

(80)
(81)

Charge Depletion for Capacitor @ 400 mils

for Various Connection Inductance

(82)

Effect of Multiple Capacitors While Keeping

Total Capacitance Constant

(power-ground pins at IC center)

10” Port1 (8,7) (Ls 50nH) Port2 (4,5) (power pin)

ε

r =4.5 Decap Ground pin 1 inch

The decap locations are 800mils, 1200mils, 2700mils from the power pin

C=1uF

• ESL=0.5nH

• ESR=1Ω

(83)

Effect of Multiple Capacitors While Keeping

Total Capacitance Constant

(power-ground pins at IC center)

10” Port1 (8,7) (Ls 50nH) Port2 (4,5) (power pin)

ε

r =4.5 Decap Ground pin 1 inch

The decap locations are 800mils, 1200mils, 2700mils from the power pin

C=0.5uF

• ESL=0.5nH

• ESR=1Ω

(84)

Effect of Multiple Capacitors While Keeping

Total Capacitance Constant

(power-ground pins at IC center)

10” Port1 (8,7) (Ls 50nH) Port2 (4,5) (power pin)

ε

r =4.5 Decap Ground pin 1 inch

The decap locations are 800mils, 1200mils, 2700mils from the power pin

C=0.25uF

• ESL=0.5nH

• ESR=1Ω

(85)

Constant Capacitance

800 mil Distance

(86)

Constant Capacitance

800 mil Distance

(87)

Constant Capacitance

1200 mil Distance

(88)

Constant Capacitance

1200 mil Distance

(89)

Constant Capacitance

2700 mil Distance

(90)

Constant Capacitance

2700 mil Distance

(91)

Example #1

Low Cap Connection Inductance

IC

GND PWR

Cap

(92)

Example #2

High Cap Connection Inductance

IC

GND PWR

Cap

(93)

Example #1

Hi Cap Connection Inductance

IC

GND PWR

Cap

(94)

Example #1

Lower Cap Connection Inductance

IC

GND PWR

Cap

PCB

(95)

Do’s

Don’ts

Mutual Inductance Helps Reduce Path

Inductance

J. L Knighten, B. Archambeault, J. Fan, et. al., “PDN Design Strategies: II. Ceramic SMT Decoupling Capacitors – Does Location Matter?,” IEEE EMC Society Newsletter, Issue No.

(96)

Effect of Capacitor Value??

• Need enough charge to supply need

• Depends on connection inductance

(97)

Time Domain Noise Voltage Across Simulated IC Power/GND Pin (1 amp) Single Capacitor (with No L) with Various Capacitor Values

-0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Level (vol ts )

750ps Rise, 10 mil planes, (0.0 nH) 1uF @ 400mils 750ps Rise, 10 mil planes,0.01uF @ 400mils 750ps Rise, 10 mil planes, 100pF @ 400mils

(98)

Time Domain Noise Voltage Across Simulated IC Power/GND Pin (1 amp) Single Capacitor (with 0.5 nH Connection L) with Various Capacitor Values

-0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Level (vol ts )

750ps Rise, 10 mil planes, (0.5nH) 1uF @ 400mils 750ps Rise, 10 mil planes, (0.5nH) 0.01 uF @ 400mils 750ps Rise, 10 mil planes, (0.5nH) 100 pF @ 400mils

(99)

Time Domain Noise Voltage Across Simulated IC Power/GND Pin (1 amp) Single Capacitor (with 1 nH Connection L) with Various Capacitor Values

-0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Level (vol ts )

750ps Rise, 10 mil planes, (1nH) 1uF @ 400mils 750ps Rise, 10 mil planes, (1nH) 0.01uF @ 400mils 750ps Rise, 10 mil planes, (1nH) 1000pF @ 400mils 750ps Rise, 10 mil planes, (1nH) 100pF @ 400mils

(100)

Noise Voltage is INDEPENDENT of

Amount of Capacitance!

As long as there is

‘enough’ charge

Dist=400 mils

ESR=30mOhms

ESL=0.5nH

(101)

Decoupling Summary (1)

• EMC Frequency Domain analysis

– Steady-state conditions Æ resonances

– Transfer function across the board

– Measurements and simulations agree well

– Distance of capacitors from ASIC load does

(102)

Decoupling Summary (2)

• Charge Delivery Time-Limited analysis

– Using equivalent SPICE circuit from simulations

– Current from capacitors change significantly as

capacitor moves further away from ASIC

– Noise at ASIC pins increase significantly as capacitor

moves further away from ASIC

– Steady-state frequency domain analysis not sufficient

for c

harge delivery design of decoupling

(103)

Decoupling Summary (3)

• Recharge the planes

– Location of Capacitor does matter!

• Effect more significant for thick dielectrics

– Connection Inductance is important

– Value of capacitance not important

– More capacitors is better than

(104)

References

Related documents

The HathiTrust Digital Library (HTDL) consists of digitized print materials contributed from the collections of some of the foremost research libraries of the

Keywords: game-based learning, visual communication, graphic design, good learning tools, good learning framework, video games, grid, modularity, hybrid learning environments

After spending some time here in Rovaniemi and getting engaged with your studies, realising that there are lot of student parties and trips you would like to do, try to remember

In February 2015, Southern Arizona Legal Aid’s (SALA) Volunteer Lawyers Program (VLP) partnered with the Navajo County Superior Court to launch a monthly self-service clinic to

The turn- around strategy provides charter- like autonomy to all schools, allowing both existing schools and new, proven school operators to run neighborhood schools. The

• Keep as to planes as close to capacitor pads as possible Capacitor IC Capacitor Connection Inductance Loop IC Connection Inductance Loop. Plane

Each 0.01µF decoupling capacitor should be mounted on the component side of the board as close to the VDD pin as possible. No vias should be used between decoupling capacitor and

Given these low probabilities for DRF and RD occurrences, the rest of the paper will be focused on analyzing the cell reliability under write and read failures (WF0,