• No results found

1,2,3 Tri­hydroxy­benzene–1,3,5 triazine (1/1)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "1,2,3 Tri­hydroxy­benzene–1,3,5 triazine (1/1)"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

organic papers

o3416

Liliana Dobrzan´ska C

6H6O3C3H3N3 doi:10.1107/S1600536805029995 Acta Cryst.(2005). E61, o3416–o3418 Acta Crystallographica Section E

Structure Reports

Online

ISSN 1600-5368

1,2,3-Trihydroxybenzene–1,3,5-triazine (1/1)

Liliana Dobrzan´ska

Department of Chemistry, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa

Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Key indicators

Single-crystal X-ray study

T= 100 K

Mean(C–C) = 0.003 A˚

Rfactor = 0.050

wRfactor = 0.107

Data-to-parameter ratio = 14.5

For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see http://journals.iucr.org/e.

#2005 International Union of Crystallography Printed in Great Britain – all rights reserved

In the title molecular co-crystal, C6H6O3C3H3N3, two hydrogen-bonded R4

4

(18) tetrameric arrangements of mol-ecules involving symmetry-related O—H N hydrogen bonds link molecules of 1,2,3-trihydroxybenzene and 1,3,5-triazine to form an infinite double-chain motif. The one-dimensional array associates with neighbouring strands, via C—H O interactions, to form supramolecular sheets that are stacked together by–interactions in a three-dimensional assembly.

Comment

Understanding the nature of non-covalent interactions is essential for the development of crystal engineering, in order to facilitate the rational design of supramolecular structures (Desiraju, 1989, 2005; Braga, 2003). As an extension of our studies of supramolecular synthons and crystal packing in molecular co-crystals formed by ‘acidic’ and ‘basic’ compo-nents, we now report the crystal structure of a (1/1) adduct, (I), of pyrogallol (1,2,3-trihydroxybenzene) and 1,3,5-triazine.

In the crystal structure of a (1/1) complex of pyrogallol and pyrimidine (Dobrzan´ska, 2005), two distinct synthons were identified, namely a heterosynthon formed via O—H N hydrogen bonds and a homosynthon formed via weaker poorly directed O—H O hydrogen bonds, coded asR4

4(18) andR2

2(10) graph sets, respectively. The crystal structure was stabilized by offset –and C—H interactions, resulting in a herringbone packing mode. The same heterosynthon was also found in another co-crystal, of pyrogallol and hexa-methylenetetramine, where a three-dimensional supramol-ecular framework was generated by C—H (arene) interactions (Tremayne & Glidewell, 2000).

The title co-crystal was prepared in order to investigate the effect on the hydrogen-bonding motif of introducing an additional N acceptor site in the heterocyclic ring. The asymmetric unit consists of one molecule of each of pyrogallol and 1,3,5-triazine (Fig. 1). The molecules are held together by hydrogen-bonded O1—H1 N1, O2—H2 N3i and O3— H3 N2iiinteractions (symmetry codes as in Table 1). This facilitates the formation of an infinite double-chain along [010] consisting of R4

4(18) tetrameric arrangements. The one-dimensional hydrogen-bonded chains of supramolecular

(2)

heterosynthons are further linked to one another via C5— H5 O1iii[symmetry code: (iii)3

2x, 1 2+y,

3

2z] interactions [C O = 3.448 (3) A˚ ], to form supramolecular sheets (Fig. 2). Moreover, benzene and triazine rings from adjacent parallel sheets interactviaoffset–interactions (centroid centroid distances 3.418 and 3.621 A˚ ), to form a three-dimensional assembly (Fig. 3).

Only R4

4(18) heterosynthons formed via O—H N hydrogen bonding are present in the structure of (I), and this motif seems to be favoured in supramolecular structures comprising pyrogallol and compounds containing two or more N acceptor sites.

Experimental

Colourless crystals of (I) suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction were obtained by slow evaporation of an ethanolic solution of 1,2,3-trihydroxybenzene and 1,3,5-triazine (1:1 molar ratio) at room temperature.

Crystal data

C6H6O3C3H3N3 Mr= 207.19 Monoclinic, P21=n a= 8.7299 (8) A˚ b= 10.8999 (10) A˚ c= 9.7586 (8) A˚ = 98.363 (2)

V= 918.71 (14) A˚3 Z= 4

Dx= 1.498 Mg m3 MoKradiation Cell parameters from 2011

reflections = 2.8–27.1

= 0.12 mm1 T= 100 (2) K Block, colourless 0.270.250.20 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer

!scans

Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1997) Tmin= 0.666,Tmax= 0.977 5630 measured reflections

2011 independent reflections 1049 reflections withI> 2(I) Rint= 0.062

max= 27.1

h=8!11 k=13!11 l=11!12

Refinement

Refinement onF2 R[F2> 2(F2)] = 0.050 wR(F2) = 0.107 S= 0.89 2011 reflections 139 parameters

H-atom parameters constrained w= 1/[2

(Fo2) + (0.0395P)2] whereP= (Fo2+ 2Fc2)/3 (/)max< 0.001

max= 0.20 e A˚

3

min=0.20 e A˚3

Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (A˚ ,).

D—H A D—H H A D A D—H A O1—H1 N1 0.84 2.08 2.863 (2) 155 O2—H2 N3i

0.84 2.14 2.892 (2) 149 O3—H3 N2ii

0.84 1.96 2.781 (2) 167

Symmetry codes: (i)x;yþ1;zþ1; (ii)x;yþ1;z.

H atoms were positioned geometrically, with C—H = 0.95 A˚ and O—H = 0.84 A˚ , and were constrained to ride on their parent atoms, withUiso(H) = 1.2 timesUeq(C,O).

Data collection:SMART(Bruker, 2001); cell refinement:SAINT (Bruker, 2002); data reduction:SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure:SHELXS97(Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: X-SEED(Atwood & Barbour, 2003; Barbour, 2001); software used to prepare material for publication:X-SEED.

organic papers

Acta Cryst.(2005). E61, o3416–o3418 Liliana Dobrzan´ska C

[image:2.610.45.301.69.218.2]

6H6O3C3H3N3

o3417

Figure 1

[image:2.610.313.562.73.277.2]

The asymmetric unit of (I), with atom labels and 50% probability displacement ellipsoids.

Figure 2

[image:2.610.315.566.326.487.2]

A perspective view of a two-dimensional supramolecular sheet in the structure of (I). Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines (N—H N indicated in red and C—H O in yellow).

Figure 3

(3)

The author thanks the Claude Harris Leon Foundation for financial support and further acknowledges the Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun´, Poland, for study leave.

References

Atwood, J. L. & Barbour, L. J. (2003).Cryst. Growth Des.3, 3–8. Barbour, L. J. (2001).J. Supramol. Chem.1, 189–191.

Braga, D. (2003).Chem. Commun.pp. 2751–2754.

Bruker (2001).SMART. Version 5.625. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Bruker (2002).SAINT. Version 6.36a. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Desiraju, G. R. (1989).Crystal Engineering. The Design of Organic Solids. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Desiraju, G. R. (2005).Chem. Commun.pp. 2995–3001. Dobrzan´ska, L. (2005).Acta Cryst.E61, o2981–o2983.

Sheldrick, G. M. (1997).SHELXS97,SHELXL97 andSADABS(Version 2.05). University of Go¨ttingen, Germany.

Tremayne, M. & Glidewell, C. (2000).Chem. Commun.pp. 2425–2426.

organic papers

o3418

Liliana Dobrzan´ska C

(4)

supporting information

sup-1

Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o3416–o3418

supporting information

Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o3416–o3418 [doi:10.1107/S1600536805029995]

1,2,3-Trihydroxybenzene

1,3,5-triazine (1/1)

Liliana Dobrza

ń

ska

S1. Comment

Understanding the nature of non-covalent interactions is essential for the development of crystal engineering, in order to facilitate the rational design of supramolecular structures (Desiraju, 1989, 2005; Braga, 2003). As an extension of our studies of supramolecular synthons and crystal packing in molecular co-crystals formed by `acidic′ and `basic′

components, we now report the crystal structure of a (1/1) adduct, (I), of pyrogallol (1,2,3-trihydroxybenzene) and 1,3,5-triazine.

In the crystal structure of a (1/1) complex of pyrogallol and pyrimidine (Dobrzańska, 2005), two distinct synthons were identified, namely a heterosynthon formed via O—H···N hydrogen bonds and a homosynthon formed via weaker poorly directed O—H···O hydrogen bonds, coded as R4

4(18) and R22(10) graph sets, respectively. The crystal structure was

stabilized by offset ππ and C—H···π interactions, resulting in a herringbone packing mode. The same heterosynthon was also found in another co-crystal, of pyrogallol and hexamethylenetetramine, where a three-dimensional supramolecular framework was generated by C—H···π (arene) interactions (Tremayne & Glidewell, 2000).

The title co-crystal was prepared in order to investigate the effect on the hydrogen-bonding motif of introducing an additional N acceptor site in the heterocyclic ring. The asymmetric unit consists of one molecule of each of pyrogallol and 1,3,5-triazine (Fig. 1). The molecules are held together by hydrogen-bonded O1—H1···N1, O2—H2···N3i and O3—

H3···N2ii interactions (symmetry codes as in Table 1). This facilitates the formation of an infinite double-chain along

[010] consisting of R44(18) tetrameric arrangements. The one-dimensional hydrogen-bonded chains of supramolecular

heterosynthons are further linked to one another via C5—H5···O1iii [symmetry code: (iii) 3/2 − x, 1/2 + y, 3/2 − z]

interactions [C···O = 3.448 (3) Å], to form supramolecular sheets (Fig. 2). Moreover, benzene and triazine rings from adjacent parallel sheets interact via offset ππ interactions (centroid···centroid distances 3.418 and 3.621 Å), to form a three-dimensional assembly (Fig. 3).

Only R44(18) heterosynthons formed via O—H···N hydrogen bonding are present in the structure of (I), and this motif

seems to be favoured in supramolecular structures comprising pyrogallol and compounds containing two or more N acceptor sites.

S2. Experimental

Colourless crystals of (I) suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction were obtained by slow evaporation of an ethanolic solution of 1,2,3-trihydroxybenzene and 1,3,5-triazine (1:1 molar ratio) at room temperature.

S3. Refinement

(5)

supporting information

[image:5.610.131.485.72.278.2]

sup-2

Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o3416–o3418

Figure 1

The asymmetric unit of (I), with atom labels and 50% probability displacement ellipsoids.

Figure 2

[image:5.610.124.483.317.616.2]
(6)

supporting information

[image:6.610.126.484.70.305.2]

sup-3

Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o3416–o3418

Figure 3

A capped-stick representation, showing the offset ππ interactions in the crystal packing of (I) (dashed blue lines). Dashed red and yellow lines represent N—H···N and C—H···O hydrogen bonds, respectively.

1,2,3-trihydroxybenzene:1,3,5-triazine (1/1)

Crystal data

C6H6O3·C3H3N3

Mr = 207.19

Monoclinic, P21/n

Hall symbol: -P2yn

a = 8.7299 (8) Å

b = 10.8999 (10) Å

c = 9.7586 (8) Å

β = 98.363 (2)°

V = 918.71 (14) Å3

Z = 4

F(000) = 432

Dx = 1.498 Mg m−3

Mo radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å Cell parameters from 2011 reflections

θ = 2.8–27.1°

µ = 0.12 mm−1

T = 100 K Block, colourless 0.27 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer

Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Graphite monochromator

ω scans

Absorption correction: multi-scan

(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1997)

Tmin = 0.666, Tmax = 0.977

5630 measured reflections 2011 independent reflections 1049 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

Rint = 0.062

θmax = 27.1°, θmin = 2.8°

h = −8→11

k = −13→11

l = −11→12

Refinement

Refinement on F2

Least-squares matrix: full

R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.050

wR(F2) = 0.107

S = 0.89

2011 reflections 139 parameters 0 restraints

(7)

supporting information

sup-4

Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o3416–o3418

Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map

Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites

H-atom parameters constrained

w = 1/[σ2(F

o2) + (0.0395P)2]

where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3

(Δ/σ)max < 0.001

Δρmax = 0.20 e Å−3

Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2,

conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used

only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2

are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq

O3 0.25207 (18) 0.89079 (14) 0.59666 (18) 0.0346 (5)

H3 0.2643 0.9670 0.5919 0.042*

O1 0.52346 (19) 0.52246 (13) 0.72620 (18) 0.0355 (5)

H1 0.4440 0.4936 0.6781 0.043*

C2 0.3880 (3) 0.7098 (2) 0.6593 (2) 0.0237 (6) O2 0.25916 (18) 0.64060 (14) 0.61386 (18) 0.0312 (5)

H2 0.1837 0.6872 0.5885 0.037*

C4 0.5210 (3) 0.9022 (2) 0.7044 (2) 0.0303 (6)

H4 0.5213 0.9892 0.7004 0.036*

C6 0.6534 (3) 0.7129 (2) 0.7686 (2) 0.0277 (6)

H6 0.7439 0.6705 0.8090 0.033*

C3 0.3890 (3) 0.8371 (2) 0.6531 (2) 0.0247 (6) C1 0.5214 (3) 0.6477 (2) 0.7165 (2) 0.0251 (6) C5 0.6533 (3) 0.8389 (2) 0.7619 (2) 0.0286 (6)

H5 0.7444 0.8831 0.7968 0.034*

N2 0.2491 (2) 0.14320 (17) 0.5545 (2) 0.0266 (5) N3 0.0615 (2) 0.28987 (17) 0.4636 (2) 0.0275 (5) N1 0.3066 (2) 0.35516 (17) 0.5783 (2) 0.0280 (5) C8 0.1115 (3) 0.1755 (2) 0.4894 (2) 0.0285 (6)

H8 0.0417 0.1112 0.4580 0.034*

C9 0.1645 (3) 0.3751 (2) 0.5111 (2) 0.0283 (6)

H9 0.1340 0.4582 0.4958 0.034*

C7 0.3420 (3) 0.2374 (2) 0.5965 (2) 0.0286 (6)

H7 0.4422 0.2184 0.6436 0.034*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23

(8)

supporting information

sup-5

Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o3416–o3418

O2 0.0232 (10) 0.0207 (9) 0.0455 (11) 0.0031 (7) −0.0090 (9) −0.0012 (8) C4 0.0313 (16) 0.0233 (14) 0.0360 (16) −0.0035 (12) 0.0036 (13) −0.0012 (12) C6 0.0178 (14) 0.0346 (16) 0.0297 (15) 0.0028 (12) 0.0002 (12) 0.0031 (12) C3 0.0224 (14) 0.0248 (14) 0.0255 (14) 0.0021 (11) −0.0008 (11) −0.0002 (12) C1 0.0237 (15) 0.0224 (14) 0.0294 (14) 0.0027 (11) 0.0048 (12) −0.0004 (12) C5 0.0209 (14) 0.0339 (16) 0.0308 (16) −0.0072 (11) 0.0025 (12) −0.0022 (12) N2 0.0248 (12) 0.0242 (12) 0.0301 (12) 0.0040 (9) 0.0016 (10) 0.0012 (10) N3 0.0279 (13) 0.0210 (11) 0.0316 (12) 0.0040 (9) −0.0028 (10) 0.0003 (10) N1 0.0239 (12) 0.0258 (12) 0.0330 (13) 0.0033 (9) 0.0000 (10) 0.0001 (10) C8 0.0261 (15) 0.0270 (14) 0.0324 (16) −0.0015 (11) 0.0037 (12) −0.0026 (12) C9 0.0282 (15) 0.0223 (14) 0.0343 (15) 0.0027 (12) 0.0042 (12) −0.0006 (12) C7 0.0205 (15) 0.0313 (16) 0.0339 (15) 0.0031 (11) 0.0033 (12) 0.0000 (12)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

O3—C3 1.373 (3) C6—C1 1.386 (3)

O3—H3 0.8400 C6—H6 0.9500

O1—C1 1.369 (2) C5—H5 0.9500

O1—H1 0.8400 N2—C8 1.322 (3)

C2—O2 1.373 (3) N2—C7 1.335 (3)

C2—C3 1.389 (3) N3—C9 1.329 (3)

C2—C1 1.391 (3) N3—C8 1.332 (3)

O2—H2 0.8400 N1—C7 1.326 (3)

C4—C3 1.383 (3) N1—C9 1.334 (3)

C4—C5 1.392 (3) C8—H8 0.9500

C4—H4 0.9500 C9—H9 0.9500

C6—C5 1.375 (3) C7—H7 0.9500

C3—O3—H3 109.5 C6—C1—C2 120.1 (2)

C1—O1—H1 109.5 C6—C5—C4 120.6 (2)

O2—C2—C3 123.0 (2) C6—C5—H5 119.7

O2—C2—C1 117.5 (2) C4—C5—H5 119.7

C3—C2—C1 119.5 (2) C8—N2—C7 114.3 (2)

C2—O2—H2 109.5 C9—N3—C8 113.7 (2)

C3—C4—C5 119.4 (2) C7—N1—C9 113.9 (2)

C3—C4—H4 120.3 N2—C8—N3 126.2 (2)

C5—C4—H4 120.3 N2—C8—H8 116.9

C5—C6—C1 120.0 (2) N3—C8—H8 116.9

C5—C6—H6 120.0 N3—C9—N1 126.3 (2)

C1—C6—H6 120.0 N3—C9—H9 116.9

O3—C3—C4 123.9 (2) N1—C9—H9 116.9

O3—C3—C2 115.6 (2) N1—C7—N2 125.7 (2)

C4—C3—C2 120.5 (2) N1—C7—H7 117.2

O1—C1—C6 118.9 (2) N2—C7—H7 117.2

O1—C1—C2 120.9 (2)

C5—C4—C3—O3 178.8 (2) O2—C2—C1—C6 −177.7 (2)

(9)

supporting information

sup-6

Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o3416–o3418

O2—C2—C3—O3 −0.7 (4) C1—C6—C5—C4 0.7 (4)

C1—C2—C3—O3 −179.2 (2) C3—C4—C5—C6 −0.3 (4) O2—C2—C3—C4 178.0 (2) C7—N2—C8—N3 0.2 (4) C1—C2—C3—C4 −0.6 (4) C9—N3—C8—N2 −0.4 (4) C5—C6—C1—O1 −179.0 (2) C8—N3—C9—N1 0.4 (4) C5—C6—C1—C2 −1.0 (4) C7—N1—C9—N3 −0.1 (4)

O2—C2—C1—O1 0.3 (3) C9—N1—C7—N2 −0.2 (3)

C3—C2—C1—O1 178.9 (2) C8—N2—C7—N1 0.2 (3)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A

O1—H1···N1 0.84 2.08 2.863 (2) 155

O2—H2···N3i 0.84 2.14 2.892 (2) 149

O3—H3···N2ii 0.84 1.96 2.781 (2) 167

Figure

Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 3

References

Related documents

Pressing the MENU button while in the Media Browser mode will access the Picture, Sound and Settings menu options.. Pressing the MENU button again will exit from

16 iSCSI PDU ● PDU (Protocol Data Unit):  The initiator and target divide  their communications into  messages. The term &#34;iSCSI 

In the previous sections, we dis- cuss the expectation that a neural network exploiting the fractional convolution should perform slightly worse than a pure binary (1-bit weights

Recording Data for New or Revised Course (Record only new or changed course information.) Course prefix (3 letters) Course Number (3 Digits) Effective Term (Example:

We are now using the second part of our test database (see Figure 4 ) ; the boxpoints table which contains 3000 customer points, and the box table with 51 dierent sized bounding

Political Parties approved by CNE to stand in at least some constituencies PLD – Partido de Liberdade e Desenvolvimento – Party of Freedom and Development ECOLOGISTA – MT –

College Mathematics (3 Credits) Biology (6 Credits) Arts and Humanities 3 Arts and Humanities 3 TOTAL 35 20 8.00 **Total up RED # ** Excess credits 0.00 8.00 Analyzing and

• Taxpayers subject to the provisions of Title II of the Income Tax Law (ITL) which have declared taxable income of $644,599,005 or more in the immediately preceding tax