• No results found

Agenda. About Our Work and Team. Background 5/11/2015. Background Prevention Incident Response Process

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Agenda. About Our Work and Team. Background 5/11/2015. Background Prevention Incident Response Process"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Data Security Incidents:

The Role of IRBs and

Information Security

Teresa Doksum, PhD, MPH & Sean Owen, CISSP, CAP, CRISC

May 22, 2015

Abt Associates | Pg 2

Agenda

Background

Prevention

Incident Response Process

1. Preparation

2. Detection and Analysis

3. Containment and Eradication

4. Post-incident

Background

About Our Work and Team

Our Work

 “Social-behavioral research and evaluation

 Funders include U.S. and other governments, foundations

 IRB volumes (annually):

– 100 non-exempt human subjects research studies/yr

– 100 studies exempt or non-research w/sensitive data

Our Team

• IRB Chair + Administrator • Members: 12 voting • Client Cybersecurity Team • Dept partners

(2)

Abt Associates | Pg 5 Abt Associates | Pg 6

Definitions

PII – Personally Identifiable

Information

– PII has varying levels of sensitivity

– Consider what the PII is paired with

PHI– Protected Health Information per HIPAA

Incident– Security event that

results in the loss of data confidentiality, integrity, or availability

– Loss of confidentiality is data being disclosed to someone who shouldn’t see it

Breach– Loss of

confidentiality of data protected under HIPAA. Breach can also have other meanings

depending on the data (i.e., federal/state/contractual definitions of breach)

Case Study #1: Email PII

External study partner

emails PII to Abt

researcher

Case Study #1: What Abt does

1)

Abt researcher notifies Abt IT help desk

2)

Incident response team engaged

3)

IRB helps identify level of

sensitivity/requirements

4)

Sender and receiver deletes email and provides

confirmation to incident response team

5)

Abt researcher:

– Tells sender to not email PII and reminds them of approved protocol – Completes any additional steps required by Abt’s Security team or the

(3)

Abt Associates | Pg 9

Prevention

Abt Associates | Pg 10

Build Partnerships and

Collaboration

You need 5+ partners to be successful

IT helpdesk manager

– Security manager or higher – IRB chair or staff

– Legal counsel

– Grant/contracts department manager or higher

Defined SOP’s and templates for data security

A communication strategy (meetings, posters, email

reminders)

A training strategy for researchers AND PARTNERS

Require Detailed Data Security

Plan

Main Contents of Data Security Plan

Describes data in detail, including data

dictionary/variable lists

Documents flow of data from start of study to

end among all study partners

Identifies tools to protect data for each step

Includes retention/destruction requirements

Identifies applicable security/privacy regulations

Lists training staff will take (CITI, HIPAA, general

security awareness, study-specific) and

promises

to give a copy of data security plan to all staff

Electronic Data Flow Chart from

Data Security Plan

(4)

Abt Associates | Pg 13

Example of Inadequate Data Security

Plan

Original Abt IRB protocol section for data security:

“Describe the provisions to protect the privacy of subjects

and to maintain the confidentiality of data”

Result: sparse, generic text to gain IRB approval:

– “All staff will promise to keep data confidential”

– “Data will be stored in locked file cabinets”

– “Data will be stored in password protected

computers and folders”

Abt Associates | Pg 14

Case Study #2: Lost

Audiorecorder

Subcontractor travelled to site to conduct

interviews

Used a digital audiorecorder

Sub’s IRB approved study w/few data security

details

Digital audiorecorder lost half way through trip

and interviews

Case Study #2: What Abt did

1)

Reported to both IRBs and funder

2)

Security worked w/sub to develop

procedures to prevent another incident (and

continue interviews)

– Download interview onto laptop; delete from recorder – Upload via secure web portal to secure server

3)

Notified participants

Poll

What encryption does your institution

require?

A. No requirements for encryption

B. Depends…on personnel (students vs.

other?), data & requirements

C. IT encrypts and IRB isn’t involved

D. Not sure, but I plan to find out

(5)

Abt Associates | Pg 17

Encrypt Everything

All mobile devices (e.g., laptops, phones,

USB drives) that store, collect, process data

Use full drive encryption

Encrypt data being sent

Microsoft file passwords are NOT encryption

(or protection)

Abt Associates | Pg 18

Case Study #3: Stolen Laptop

Field interviewer laptop stolen

Laptop was company issued and encrypted

Case Study #3: What Abt does

1)

Field interviewer notifies IT help desk

2)

Verify laptop had full disk encryption

3)

Request that researcher notify police

4)

Document incident and police report number

Incident Response Process

(6)

Abt Associates | Pg 21

Main Players and Data Security

Responsibilities

IRB Ensure researchers protect data; respond to 

incidents per  human subjects regulations Security Manage the information security incident 

response and investigation

IT Maintain software and hardware used to 

protect the information Study Team Protect data and report incidents Contracts 

Department

Support above Legal Counsel Support above

Abt Associates | Pg 22

1. Preparation

Working against the clock

Timers for reporting data security incidents and/or breaches to funder or data providers are in the following:

– Contracts and data use agreements • Varies, 24-72 hours and no more

than 30 days.. – Federal Laws

• PII – 60 minutes • HIPAA – 60 days – State Laws

• MA – “Without unreasonable delay” • CA – “Without unreasonable delay”

Other thoughts about timers

Ethical responsibility

Reputation

30 days is a long time for participants, short

for you.

Better to over report and work out a system

with your client/funder/partner/data provider

than under report and surprise them. Builds

trust.

(7)

Abt Associates | Pg 25

Case Study #4: Lost Paper

Incident (Reporting)

 Day 1: Site notified Abt study team

 Day 3: Abt study team notified IRB +Security. Required study director to immediately notify funder

 Day 5: Abt study director notified funder

Funder said notification took too long

Incident (Event)

 Program site lost 2 consents and baseline form w/SSN

 Forms not found despite weeks of looking and site visit

Abt Associates | Pg 26

Case Study #4: What Abt did

1)

Followed established process once Security was notified

2)

Flew to the site and did data security refresher training

3)

Explained timers involved to all parties

4)

Refined incident reporting process to require simultaneous notification

5)

Clarified description of an “incident”

6)

Training on details above and remediation that can be taken in the field

7)

Notified participants and offered identity theft protection

2. Detection and Analysis

Study Team Reports Incident

IT or Security will ask for the following information to

begin any triage:

1.

What study data was

or may have been

lost or

disclosed to unauthorized people

2.

Why you believe it was lost/disclosed

3.

Who it was disclosed to, if known

4.

Date and time of all the events

5.

What was done, if anything, to reduce the risk of

disclosure

(8)

Abt Associates | Pg 29

Triage – What are the data?

Protected Health Information (PHI) subject to

HIPAA?

Personally Identifiable Information (PII)?

Identifiers only?

Other types of data subject to data agreement

requirements?

What was seen or lost?

How many records?

There will be false alarms!!!

Abt Associates | Pg 30

Classification of Incidents

Customize with legal counsel, funder, institution

expectations

https://www.us-cert.gov/government-users/reporting-requirements

Minorincidents that do notrequire notification – Incident does not disclose information outside the study team

Minorincidents that require notification – Incident that results in a violation of regulation or

requirement, but does not rise to the level of breach

Majorincidents that require notification – Incidents that result in potential harm to participants. The incident satisfies the requirements for “breach”

(9)

Abt Associates | Pg 33

4. Post-Incident

Abt Associates | Pg 34

Post-Incident

Security

– Provides final incident report to funder

– Notifies them that you consider the matter closed

IRB (if needed per policy & regulations) – Request unanticipated problem report – Notify participants

IRB and legal counsel with Security

– Determine threshold for notifying externally (e.g., regulators such as OHRP)

– Refer to security regulations

Lessons learned feeds back into prevention

Final Thoughts

Incident Response is a team effort

Prepare before study teams collect sensitive data

Train everyone on requirements and incident

reporting process

Communicate early and honestly with affected

parties (participants, data provider, funder,

regulators)

Report incident trends back to study teams and

internal partners

For More Info/Resources

PRIM&R Blog post with data security plan template:

– http://primr.blogspot.com/2015/04/the-role-of-irb-and-information-security.html

[email protected]; 301-347-5734

References

Related documents

• 1 1 876 876 First sheet asphalt pavement laid in First sheet asphalt pavement laid in Washington, DC with imported lake.. Washington, DC with

As well as a higher volume of claims reducing the amount of compensation awarded to victims in a no-fault system, the threat of lower compensation is also clear as the Deputy

Although most security breach notification laws focus on incidents affecting electronic data, a number of state and federal laws impose notification requirements when an

As soon as security incidents are detected they should be immediately reported to a member of the Security Incident Response Team or the Security Officer.. A Security

But what differentiates a loyalty program from traditional CRM is that a loyalty programs aim at proactively and continuously rewarding the customer for loyal behaviors and

Profit after tax decreased by 8% to €522.8m compared to €569.3m in the year ended March 31, 2013 primarily due to a 5% increase in total operating expenses and a 4%

As there is no simple definition for an IG a serious incident, the IG team will quality check daily CCG incidents recorded on SIRMS to determine if the recoded incident is

As there is no simple definition for an IG a serious incident, the IG team will quality check daily CCG incidents recorded on SIRMS to determine if the recoded incident