• No results found

First Order Differential Equations

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "First Order Differential Equations"

Copied!
17
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

First Order Di¤erential Equations

Exact Equations

Philippe B. Laval

(2)

Introduction

We are still looking at 1st order equations.

In today’s lecture we will discuss exact equationsthat is di¤erential equations of the form M(x;y)dx+N(x;y)dy =0.

In these slides, we assume that the dependent variable is y and the independent variable isx. When we sayy, we really mean "the dependent variable" and when we say x we really mean "the independent variable". The reader needs to be able to adapt this if di¤erent variables are used in an equation.

(3)

De…nitions

Recall from Calculus that if y =f (x)then the di¤erential of f is de…ned to be dy =f0(x)dx. It represents the amount by whichy will change if y =f (x) andx changes by the amountdx. There is a similar notion for functions of several variables. It is called the total di¤erential.

De…nition

Ifz =f (x;y) is a function of two variables with continuous …rst order partial derivatives then its di¤erential is

dz =df = @f @xdx+

@f

@ydy (1)

It is sometimes called the total di¤erential. It represents the amount by which z or f will change if z =f (x;y) andx changes bydx andy changes by dy.

(4)

De…nitions

With a level curve that is a curve of the formf (x;y) =C, equation 1 becomes @f

@xdx+ @f

@ydy =dC =0. This is of the form M(x;y)dx+N(x;y)dy =0.

De…nition

(5)

De…nitions

M(x;y)dx+N(x;y)dy =0 is a di¤erential equation we obtained by …nding the di¤erential of the level curve f (x;y) =C hence its solution, given implicitly, is f (x;y) =C. Suppose now that we are given a di¤erential equation of the form M(x;y)dx+N(x;y)dy =0, how can we …nd its solution? For this, we have to be able to answer the following two questions:

1 Given M(x;y)dx+N(x;y)dy =0, how do we know if

M(x;y)dx+N(x;y)dy is a total di¤erential that is if there exists a functionf such that M(x;y)dx+N(x;y)dy = @f

@xdx+ @f @ydy? 2 Even if there is such a function f, how do we …nd it?

3 Once we …ndf, the solution toM(x;y)dx +N(x;y)dy =0 will be f (x;y) =C, an implicit solution. In order to …nd C, we will need to be given initial conditions.

(6)

De…nitions

De…nition

Consider the di¤erential form M(x;y)dx+N(x;y)dy.

1 It is said to be exactin a rectangleR if there exists a function f (x;y) such that

@f

@x (x;y) =M(x;y) and @f

@y (x;y) =N(x;y) for all (x;y) in R that is the total di¤erential of f satis…es df (x;y) =M(x;y)dx +N(x;y)dy.

2 IfM(x;y)dx+N(x;y)dy is an exact di¤erential form, then the equation M(x;y)dx +N(x;y)dy =0 is said to be anexact equation.

(7)

De…nitions

Theorem

Suppose the …rst order partial derivatives of M(x;y) and N(x;y) are continuous in a rectangle R then

M(x;y)dx+N(x;y)dy =0

is an exact equation in R if and only if the compatibility condition @M

@y (x;y) = @N

@x (x;y) (2)

holds for all (x;y) in R. Example

(8)

Method 1 for Solving Exact Equations

To solveM(x;y)dx+N(x;y)dy =0, follow these steps: 1 If it is exact, then @f

@x(x;y) =M(x;y). Integrate both sides with respect to x to get

f (x;y) =

Z

M(x;y)dx+g(y) (3)

2 To …nd g(y), di¤erentiate both sides of equation 3 with respect to y, substituting N(x;y) for @f

@y (x;y). Then solve forg 0(y).

3 Integrate g0(y) with respect toy to …nd g(y) which can then be substituted in equation 3 to …nd f (x;y).

4 The solution to M(x;y)dx+N(x;y)dy =0 is given implicitly by f (x;y) =C.

(9)

Method 2 for Solving Exact Equations

To solveM(x;y)dx+N(x;y)dy =0, follow these steps: 1 If it is exact, then @f

@y (x;y) =N(x;y). Integrate both sides with respect to y to get

f (x;y) =

Z

N(x;y)dy +h(x) (4)

2 To …nd h(x), di¤erentiate both sides of equation 4 with respect to x, substituting M(x;y) for @f

@x (x;y). Then solve forh 0(x).

3 Integrate h0(x)with respect to x to …nd h(x) which can then be substituted in equation 4 to …nd f (x;y).

4 The solution to M(x;y)dx+N(x;y)dy =0 is given implicitly by f (x;y) =C.

(10)

Examples

Example (Solving an Exact DE) Solve 2xydx+ x2 1 dy =0

Example (Solving an Exact DE)

Solve e2y ycos(xy) dx+ 2xe2y xcos(xy) +2y dy=0

Example (Solving an Initial Value Problem) Solve dy

dx =

xy2 cosxsinx

(11)

Nonexact Equations Made Exact

Recall from the previous section that the left-hand side of dy

dx +P(x)y =Q(x) can be transformed into a derivative when we multiply the equation by an integrating factor.

The same basic idea sometimes works for a nonexact di¤erential equation M(x;y)dx+N(x;y)dy =0 that is it is sometimes possible to …nd an integrating factor (x;y) such that

(x;y)M(x;y)dx+ (x;y)N(x;y)dy =0 (5) is an exact equation.

(12)

Nonexact Equations Made Exact

To …nd , we use the compatibility condition given in equation 2 that is @ @y ( (x;y)M(x;y)) = @ @x( (x;y)N(x;y)) or M@ @y + @M @y =N @ @x + @N @x or N@ @x M @ @y = @M @y @N @x (6)

(13)

Nonexact Equations Made Exact

Although M andN are known and hence their partial derivatives are known, this is a partial di¤erential equation in .

Solving it is beyond the scope of this class. So, we will make some assumptions to simplify this equation.

Since we only know how to solve ODEs, we are going to assume that depends only in one variable.

So, we have two possibilities to …nd . If one does not work, try the other one. If neither works, then our technique will not work. The possibilities are:

Case 1: = (x) is a function ofx only.

(14)

Nonexact Equations Made Exact: Case 1

In this case, @

@y =0 and equation 6 becomes

d dx = @M @y @N @x N (7) If the quotient @M @y @N @x

N is still a function of bothx andy, then we are at an impasse and our technique won’t work.

But if @M

@y @N

@x

N after all possible simpli…cations is a function of x only, then equation 7 is a separable linear di¤erential equation. Its solution is

(x) =eR ( @M

(15)

Nonexact Equations Made Exact: Case 2

In this case, @

@x =0 and equation 6 becomes

d dy = @N @x @M @y M (8) If the quotient @N @x @M @y

M is still a function of bothx andy, then we are at an impasse and our technique won’t work.

But if @N

@x @M

@y

M after all possible simpli…cations is a function of y only, then equation 8 is a separable linear di¤erential equation. Its solution is

(y) =eR ( @N

@x @@My)

(16)

Nonexact Equations Made Exact: Finishing

If we manage to get , then equation 5 is now exact and we can …nish solving it by using the technique to solve exact equations. We illustrate this with an example.

Example

(17)

Assignment

References

Related documents

Fire, explosion, electrical shock, or pressure release could occur and cause death or serious injury, if these safe service procedures are not followed..

Given any two non-zero distinct irrational Gaussian integers such that their product added with either 1 or 4 is a perfect square, an irrational Gaussian

The foregoing analysis has been designed to illustrate what abductive logic is, how it manifests itself in the workings of a legal system, and what additional

The purpose of this research is to know the factors and variable of change order risk in high building building in DKI Jakarta, to know the result of change order risk analysis

Finally, microscopic evidence is presented for zeolite A synthesis from clear solution (i.e. w ithout initial am orphous gel formation) using recipes, based u p o n

Stougaard and Xue (2004) conducted a 3 year field experiment at Kalispell, USA to investigate the effects of spring wheat seed size and seeding rate on wheat spike

Exact, linear and Bernoulli’s equations, Introduction to second order linear differential equations with variable coefficients, Method of variation of parameters,

Other methods for solving first-order ordinary differential equations include the integration of exact equations, and the use of either clever substitutions or more general