• No results found

Vol 6 No 1: March-2017

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Vol 6 No 1: March-2017"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Research Article

Improving the production of barley

genotypes by foliar application of

micronutrients

Anjum

1

, Bashir Ahmad

1

, Muhammad Islam

1*

, Muhammad Ibrar

2

, Zahid

Hussain

3

and Wajid Ali Shah

3

1. Department of Agronomy, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar-Pakistan 2. Department of Horticulture, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar-Pakistan 3. Department of Agronomy, Bacha Khan University, Charsadda-Pakistan

*Corresponding author’s email: [email protected] Citation

Anjum, Bashir Ahmad, Muhammad Islam, Muhammad Ibrar, Zahid Hussainand Wajid Ali Shah.Improving the production of barley genotypes by foliar application of micronutrients. Pure and Applied Biology. Vol. 6, Issue 1, pp278-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.19045/bspab.2017.60025

Received: 12/02/2016 Revised: 16/02/2017 Accepted: 20/02/2017 Online First: 24/02/2017

Abstract

A field experiment on “improving the production of barley genotypes by foliar application of micronutrients” was carried out at Agronomy Research Farm, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa-Pakistan, during 2013-14. Two barley genotypes [G1=2-Row barley and G2=6-Row barley] and foliar application of two micronutrients Zn and Cu [MN1=Control (water spray), MN2=4 kg Zn ha-1, MN3=1.0 kg Cu ha-1, MN4=4 kg Zn ha-1 + 1.0

kg Cu ha-1] were tested in the experiment. The experiment was laid out in a randomized

complete block design (RCBD) replicated three times. The plot size 1.8m x 3m, having 30 cm row to row distance was used. Results evaluated that 2-row barely produced maximum numbers of tillers plant-1 (7), plant height (98.9 cm), long spikes (9.1cm), and thousand grains weight

(52.5 g), while 6-row was efficient to produced more grains spike-1 (54) and grain yield (3990 kg ha-1). Application of micronutrients revealed that combine application of zinc and copper improved yield and yield components of barley. Maximum tillers plant-1 (7), plant height (92.3

cm), spike length (9.0 cm), grains spike-1 (44), thousand grains weight (53.8g) and grain yield (3934kg ha-1) was produced by combine application of Zn and Cu followed by sole Zn application as compared to control. Therefore it can be concluded from the results that 6-row barley performed better in terms of grain yield and combine application of Zn and Cu enhanced all yield components.

Keywords: Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.); Genotypes; Micronutrients; Yield and yield components

Introduction

Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) is the

important cereal crop of dry areas in many countries of Middle East, West Asia and North Africa [1] and is essential for the livelihood of many poor farmers due to its

(2)

mainly grown for grain and straw for small ruminants in winter with the green fodder [3]. Local varieties show no response or little to fertilizer [4]. Few improved varieties of barley are now available and some of these are resistant to cold, drought and disease [3]. There is therefore considerable potential for the adoption of improved varieties and technology to contribute for improving the livelihoods of farmers in

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and similar

environments. There are two genotypes of barley (two row and six row barley).Two row barley have two rows of main florets which present on the opposite sides of the rachis, fertile and produce seeds. There are two axillary (side branch) florets with each of these main florets. The axillary florets are infertile in two row barley and fertile in six row types [5]. Two-row barley seeds are symmetrical and of an even size, so they have a tendency to absorb water at same rate

and germinate. Six-row barley is

symmetrical center but the two lateral rows of seeds are a little shorter and thinner so they are different in water uptake and germination speed [6]. Micronutrients play a vital role in plant nutrition and plant production. Agricultural soils generally show iron, copper and zinc deficiency. The deficiency of micronutrients may be primary which occur due to their low contents or secondary which caused by soil different factors that reduces their availability to plants [7]. Zinc and copper are important in many plant enzyme systems which act as bridges to connect the enzyme with the substrate upon which it is to act. Zinc is one of the important essential trace elements for the normal healthy growth and reproduction of crop plants. It is required by the plant tissues in relatively small concentrations (5-100 mg kg-1) [8]. Zinc concentration of

plants is also affected by organic matter, water situation, and texture of the soils [9]. Normal growth and metabolism of plants is

affected by copper which is an essential micronutrient. The requirement of these micro elements can be restored by application to the soil or spray on the foliage. The role of essential microelements copper and zinc was proved in forming of more than 200 enzymes [10]. Lack of copper

hinders nitrogen uptake and protein

synthesis. It plays an important role in

transpiration metabolism and electron

transport. Micronutrient deficiency can greatly disturb plant yield and quality, and the health of domestic animals and humans [11]. Thus keeping in view the importance of Zn and Cu in crop production the present experiment was conducted to study the effect of foliar application of Zn and Cu on barley genotypes.

Materials and methods

A field experiment on “improving the production of barley genotypes by foliar

application of micro-nutrients” was

conducted at Agronomy Research Farm, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan, during 2013-14. Two barley genotypes [G1=2-Row barley

and G2=6-Row barley] and foliar

application of two micronutrients Zn and Cu [MN1=Control (water spray), MN2=4 kg Zn

ha-1, MN

3=1.0 kg Cu ha-1, MN4=4 kg Zn ha -1+1.0 kg Cu ha-1] were tested in the

experiment. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) replicated three times. The plot size 1.8m x 3m, having 30 cm row to row distance was used. Zinc sulfate and Copper sulfate were used as source of Zn and Cu respectively. These micro nutrients were applied before boot stage. All other

agronomic practices were uniformly

maintained for all plots. Data were collected on tillers plant-1, plant height (cm), spike length (cm), grains number spike-1, thousand

(3)

plants in each plot and then averaged. Plant height was measured in randomly selected 10 plants from ground to the top of plant with the help of meter rod apart from awns at maturity. Spike length was measured in randomly selected 10 spikes from end to top without awns length and was averaged. Grains spike-1 was recorded by counting grains in randomly selected five spikes in each plot and was averaged simply. Thousand grains weight was recorded on electronic balance after counting thousand grains from the seed lot of each sub plot through laser counting machine. The four central rows of each plot were harvested, sun dried and threshed. The grain weighed and converted in to kg ha-1 using the following formula:

Grain yield (kg ha-1) = Grain yield x 10000

R-R distance (m) x row length (m) x No. of rows Statistical analysis

Data was statistically analyzed according to the procedure described by [12] for randomized complete block design and means were separated by least significant

differences test (P < 0.05) upon

significant F-test.

Results and discussion Tillers plant-1

Barley genotypes, foliar spray of

micronutrients and G x MN interaction had significant effect on tillers plant-1 (Table 1). Higher number of tillers plant-1(7) was

produced by 2 row barley while minimum number of tillers plant-1(6) was produced by 6-row barley. These results are in line with [13] who reported that number of shoots was higher for 2-row as compared to 6-row

barley. Application of micronutrients

revealed that more tillers plant-1(7) were

produce by sole application of zinc as well as combine application of Zn + Cu. Considerably lower number of tillers plant -1(6) recoded where micronutrients were not

applied or Cu was applied alone. Our findings are similar with [14] who reported that micronutrients in form of soil fertilizer or solution spray increased number of tillers. Regarding the interaction between G x MN, more number of tillers plant-1 were recorded

in all genotypes when Cu and Zn were applied in combination (Figure 1a).

Table 1. Tillers plant-1, plant height and spike length of barley genotypes as affected by micronutrients

Treatments Tiller plant plant-1 Plant height (cm) Spike Length (cm)

Barley Genotypes (G)

2-Rows barley 7 a 98.90 a 9.1 a

6-Rows barley 6 b 83.60 b 8.2 b

LSD value 0.3 1.4 0.18

Micronutrients (MN)

Control (no use of nutrients) 6 b 90.12 b 8.4 c

Copper (Cu) 6 b 91.23 ab 8.6 bc

Zinc (Zn) 7 a 90.34 b 8.7 b

Cu + Zn combination 7 a 92.3 a 9 a

LSD value 0.43 2 0.26

LSD value for interaction

G x MN * ns *

(4)

Figure 1a. Tillers plant-1 of barley genotypes as affected by micronutrients

Plant height (cm)

Data regarding plant height of barley as affected by genotypes and micronutrients are presented in Table 1. Barley varieties had also a significant effect on plant height Taller plants were produced by 2-row barley (98.9cm) and short stature plants were produced by 6-row barley (83.6 cm). It might be due to the genetic superiority of 2-row barley. Findings are similar with [15] who reported that 2-row barley has potential to produce maximum dry matter. Foliar spray of micronutrients had a significant effect on plant height. Zinc and Copper combine foliar spray improved plant height more than the remaining treatments. Greater plant height (92.3 and 91.23 cm) was recorded with sole application of Cu and Zn+Cu in combination. Control and Zn application lead to lower plant height (90.12 and 90.34 cm respectively). It might be due to zinc and Copper which improve nitrogen

absorption, protein synthesis and

photosynthesis. Findings are similar to [16, 17] who stated that addition of these nutrients improved yield components. The interactive effect of G x MN was found non-significant.

Spike length (cm)

(5)

Figure 1b. Spike length of barley genotypes as affected by micronutrients

Grains spike-1

Table 2 revealed grains spike-1 of barley considerably varied by genotypes and micronutrients application, whereas G x MN interaction was non-significant. Among the genotypes, 6-row barley produced more number of grains spike-1 (54) while lesser (29) were produced by 2-row barley. Usually 2-row barley has a lower number of

grains spike-1 compensated by higher

tillering capacity and 1000 grains weight [23]. Regarding foliar application of micronutrients, More grains (44) were counted for combine application of Zn and Cu, followed by sole application of Zinc (43) while minimum (39) for control. Our results are supported by [24] who found significant increase in grains spike-1, 1000 grains weight and grain yield of barley through Zinc and Copper solution spray.

Table 2. Number of grains spike-1, 1000 grains weight and grain yield of barley genotypes as affected by micronutrients

Treatments Grains spike-1 Thousand grains

weight (g)

Grain yield (kg ha-1) Barley Genotypes (G)

2-Rows barley 29 b 52.5 a 3681 b

6-Rows barley 54 a 52.1 b 3990 a

LSD value 1.65 0.4 126

Micronutrients (MN)

Control (no use of nutrients) 39 c 51.4 bc 3688 b

Copper (Cu) 41 bc 52.2 b 3801 ab

Zinc (Zn) 43 ab 52.3 b 3920 a

Cu + Zn combination 44 a 53.3 a 3934 a

LSD value 2.3 0.88 178

LSD value for interaction

G x MN ns ** *

(6)

Thousand grains weight (g)

It is evident form statistical analysis of the data that thousand grains weight of barley differed significantly among genotypes, foliar spray of micronutrients (Table 2). Two-row barley produced heavier thousand grains weight (52.2 g) as compared to 6-row barley (52.1 g). These results are in agreement with the investigations of [13] who stated that there is negative co relation between numbers of grains spike-1 and thousand grains weight due to which the thousand grains weight of 6-row barley was inferior. Foliar application of micronutrients

had also a significant effect on thousand grains weight of barley. Heavier thousand grains weight was produced by combine application of Zinc and Copper (53.3 g) as compared to control (51.4 g). [25] reported

similar results. Zinc may enhance

chlorophyll content and also may increase level of indole acetic acid (IAA) a vital

hormone necessary for growth and

development [16]. In case of G x MN

interaction, thousand grains weight was increased in both genotypes with combine application of Zinc and Copper (Figure 1c).

Figure 1c. Thousand grains weight of barley genotypes as affected by micronutrients

Grain yield (kg ha-1)

Grain yield of barley considerably differed

among genotypes and micronutrients

application (Table 2). Regarding barley genotypes, higher grain yield (3990 kg ha-1) was produced by 6-row barley while lower grain yield (3681 kg ha-1) was produced by 2-row barley. It might be due to the more number of grain rows in 6-row barley than 2-row. Results are in line with [13] who reported that 6-row barley produced maximum grain yield than 2-row barley.

(7)

Figure 1d. Grain yield of barley genotypes as affected by micronutrients

Conclusion and recommendations

It has been concluded from the above results that foliar spray of micronutrients (Zn & Cu) in combination produced higher grains spike-1, biological yield and grain yield. In genotypes of barley, 6-row barley performed better in terms of number of grains spike-1 and grain yield than 2-row barley. Thus 6-row barley and the application of Zn+Cu are recommended for higher production of barley.

Authors’ contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: Anjum & B Ahmad, Performed the experiments: Anjum, Data collection and field inspections: Anjum, M Islam & M Ibrar, Statistical Analysis of the data: Anjum, B Ahmad, WA Shah, & Z Hussain, Contributed reagents/ materials/ analysis tools: M Ibrar & B Ahmad, Wrote the paper: Anjum & M Islam.

References

1. Ceccarelli S (1987). Yield potential and

drought tolerance of segregating

populations of barley in contrasting environments. Euphytica 36: 265-274. 2. Forster BP, Ellis RP, Talame V, Sanguineti

MC, Tuberosa R, Bahri MH & Salemn Ben M (2004). Genotype and phenotype association with drought tolerance in

barley tested in North Africa. Ann Appl Biol 144: 157-168.

3. Khan MF, Anderson DM, Nutkani MI & Butt NM (1999). Preliminary results from reseeding degraded Dera Ghazi Khan range land to improve small ruminant production in Pakistan. Small Rumin. Res

32: 43-49.

4. Rees DJ, Islam M, Samiullah A, Qureshi Z, Mehmood S, Rehman F, Keatinge JDH, Raza SH & Khan BR (1989). Water

harvesting and nitrogen fertilizer

application as means of increasing crop water use efficiencies in suboptimal

conditions in upland Balochistan.

International Workshop on Soil and Water Management for Improved Water Use Efficiency in Rain-fed Areas, Ankara, ICARDA, Aleppo 177-185.

5. Komatsuda T, Pourkheirandish M, He C, Azhaguvel P, Kanamori H, Perovic D, Stein N, Graner A, Wicker T, Tagiri A, Lundqvist U, Fujimura T, Matsuoka M, Matsumoto T & Yano M. (2007). Six-rowed barley originated from a mutationin a homeodomain-leucine zipper I-class

homeobox gene. Proceedings of the

National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 1424-1429. 6. Harris DA (1996). The effects of manure,

(8)

of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench in semi-arid Botswana 40(1-2): 73-88.

7. Sharma RK & Agarwal M (2005). Biological effects of heavy metals: an overview J Environ Biol 26: 301-313.

8. Parker DR, Aguilera JJ & Thomason DN (1992). Zinc-phosphorus interactions in two cultivars of tomato (Lycipersicon esculentum L.) grown in chelator-buffered nutrient solutions. Plant Soil 143: 163-177. 9. Bergman W (1992). Nutritional disorders of

plants. Development visual and analytical

diagnosis.Gustav Fisher Veriag Jena.

Stuttgart. New York.

10. Spiro TG (1983). Metal ions in biology and

zinc enzymes, Academic Press, New

York. 232.

11. Welch RM (2003). Farming for nutritious

foods: Agricultural technologies for

improved human health, (IFA-FAO

Agricultural Conference, Rome). 242. 12. Steel RGD & Torrie JH (1996). Principal and

Procedures of statistics, 3rd ed., McGraw

Hill Book Co, Singapore.

13. Gouis JLe (1992). A comparison between two and six-row winter barley genotypes for above-ground dry matter production and distribution. Agron EDP Sci 12 (2): 163-171.

14. Boorboori MR, Eradatmand D & Tehrani MM (2011). Effect of micronutrient application by different methods on yield, morphological traits and grain protein percentage of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)

in greenhouse conditions. Academic

Journal 12: 127-134.

15. Gill KS, Akim TO, Pettyjohn JP & Meghan E (2012). Evaluation of forage type barley varieties for forage yield and nutritive value in the Peace Region of Alberta. J Agric Sci 5(2): 1916-9752. 16. Alloway BJ (2008). Zinc in soils and crop

nutrition. Second edition, published by IZA and IFA Brussels, Belgium and Paris, France 135.

17. Mengel K & Kirkby EA (2001). Principles of plant nutrition. The Netherlands.

Kluwer Academic Publishers 849.

18. Madic, M, Knezevic D & Paunovic A (2012). Genetic analysis of spike traits in

two and multi rowed barley crosses.

Genetika 44(3): 475-482.

19. Michail T, Walter, Astrid T, Walter G, Dieter G, Maria SJ & Doming M (2004). A survey of foliar mineral nutrient concentrations of Pinuscanariensis at field plots in Tenerife. Ecol. Mange 189: 49-55.

20. Thalooth AT, Badr NM & Mohamed MH (2005). Effect of foliar spraying with zinc and different levels of phosphatic fertilizer on growth and yield of sun

flower plants grown under saline

condition. Egypt J Agron 27: 11-22. 21. Mahmoud AR, Magda MH, Ahmed AA &

Abd-El-Baky MMH (2008). Response of okra plants (Hibiscus esculentus L.) to spraying with zinc sulphate and levels of nitrogen application. Egypt J Appl Sci 23: 296-303.

22. El-Desouky SA, Faten HMI, Wanas A, Fathy ES & Abd El-All MM (2009). Effect of natural materials and nutrients

on vegetative growth of tomato

(Lycopersicon Esculentummill) plants under high temperature conditions. Egypt J Appl Sci 24: 312-328.

23. Jestin L (1985). Some aspects of adaptation and adoptability of barley in European condition. Neth J Agric Sci 33: 195-213. 24. Abdel-Hady BA (2007). Effect of zinc

application on growth and nutrient uptake of barley plant irrigated with saline water. J App Sci Res 3(6): 431-436. 25. Malakooti MJ & Tehrani MM (2006). Effect

of micronutrients on increased yield and quality improvement of agricultural product, micro elements with macro effects. 3rded, Tarbiat Modares University

with cooperation of Research Institute of Water and Soil, Behran, Iran 390.

26. McCauley A, Jones C & Jacobsen J (2009). Plant nutrient functions and deficiency

and toxicity symptoms. Nutrient

Figure

Table 1. Tillers plantmicronutrients  Treatments
Figure 1a. Tillers plant-1 of barley genotypes as affected by micronutrients
Table 2. Number of grains spikeas affected by micronutrients Treatments
Figure 1c. Thousand grains weight of barley genotypes as affected by micronutrients

References

Related documents

  ParEEoning    Manager spreads namespace across Owners by assigning leases    Consistency   

• Our goal is to make Pittsburgh Public Schools First Choice by offering a portfolio of quality school options that promote high student achievement in the most equitable and

In the fifteenth century another great building, D, with its arcades opening up, on the ground floor, onto the courtyard, took up the whole of the western side of the Villa.. In

The SPACSYS model provided reasonable simulations on cutting for- age biomass and the dynamics of water fl uxes when compared to the primary measured data collected from the reseeded

If services such as those which enjoined prayer for the Dead … and if phrases such as those which prayed that the elements as Holy Communion might become to the recipients the Body

Principal response curves analysis of changes in the soil chemistry down the profile comparing the ef- fects of full inversion tillage to an untreated control in two contrasting

The range of simulated grain yield caused by different combinations of temperature response functions in APSIM and SiriusQuality was on average 52% (65%) and 64% (78%) of

The findings have shown that although relatively few mental health nurses were undertaking the supplementary prescribing role at the time of research, the majority of