• No results found

BREEAM Refurbishment Statistics

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "BREEAM Refurbishment Statistics"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

BREEAM Refurbishment Statistics

This collection of statistical data provides a ‘snap-shot’ of refurbishment and fit-out projects certificated to BREEAM from projects assessed against BREEAM 2008 and BREEAM 2011 New Construction schemes. It provides clients, architects, contractors, building owners, design teams and assessors with knowledge about how refurbishment and fit-out projects are performing against BREEAM across the market place, helping you to identify how you compare in terms of the overall score as well as individual category scores.

Top ten scoring non domestic refurbishment and fit-out projects

The following table highlights the top 10 scoring refurbishment and fit-out projects assessed under the BREEAM UK 2011, BREEAM UK 2008 New Construction schemes and the BREEAM International Commercial scheme (note: this excludes projects that are mixed new build/refurbishment.).

Development Region Scheme Type Stage Rating Score (%)

1 Embankment Place, Price Waterhouse Coopers LLP

London BREEAM UK New Construction : Offices 2008

Refurbishment Final Outstanding 96.31

Quadrant 2 (10 Air Street), The Crown Estate

London BREEAM UK New Construction : Offices 2011

Major refurb (shell only)

Interim Outstanding 90.65

Harrogate International Centre Yorkshire & the Humber

BREEAM UK New Construction : Bespoke 2008

Refurbishment Interim Outstanding 87.98

Waitrose, Bracknell South East BREEAM UK New Construction : Retail 2008

Fit out Final Outstanding 87.38

Powerhouse Kjørbo Norway BREEAM UK New Construction : Offices 2012

Refurbishment Interim Outstanding 87.2

Carre Vert Ilôt Kleber France BREEAM International Commercial: Offices 2009

Refurbishment Final Outstanding 87.07

4 Stable Street, Argent (Property Development) Services LLP

London BREEAM UK New Construction : Offices 2008

Fit out Final Outstanding 86.72

Bombay Sapphire Distillery Process Buildings

South East BREEAM UK New Construction : Industrial 2008

Refurbishment Interim Outstanding 86.72

1 Southampton Street, Aviva Investors

London BREEAM UK New Construction : Offices 2008

Refurbishment Final Excellent 82.17

Marcol House, Great Portland Estates

London BREEAM UK New Construction : Offices 2008

(2)

Part of the BRE Trust

BREEAM Refurbishment Statistics

P:2

Projects certified under BREEAM UK by scheme

The following data is from an extract of data from 1000 buildings certificated against the BREEAM 2008 schemes, representing 10% of total buildings certificated against BREEAM.

Fit-Out

Offices and Retail fit-out are the most common building types certificated representing 87% of buildings. This is followed by Bespoke (4.7%), Healthcare (2.3%) and Multi-residential (2.3%) with Education, Industrial and Data Centres representing 3.6% of fit-out projects.

Scheme Fit-out Bespoke 4.7% Data Centres 1.2% Education 1.2% Healthcare 2.3% Higher Education 0.0% Industrial 1.2% Multi-residential 2.3% Offices 36.0% Retail 51.0%

Refurbishment

Refurbishment projects assessed against BREEAM generally include a wide range of buildings types with Offices and Bespoke projects being the predominant building type (72%) as well as Higher Education, Industrial, Multi-Residential, Retail and Healthcare making up a significant proportion of building types. Scheme Refurbishment Bespoke 23.7% Data Centres 0.0% Education 0.7% Healthcare 3.0% Higher Education 6.7% Industrial 5.2% Multi-residential 5.2% Offices 48.9% Retail 6.7% Bespoke Data Centres Education Healthcare Higher Education Industrial Multi-residential Offices Retail

Fit-out

Bespoke Data Centres Education Healthcare Higher Education Industrial Multi-residential Offices Retail Refurbishment

(3)

Average BREEAM UK Rating: Refurbishment and Fit-out

Refurbishment

More than 75% of refurbishment projects achieved at least a BREEAM ‘Very Good’ rating. The majority of (65%) refurbishment projects achieved a ‘Very Good’ rating, with 10% achieving an ‘Excellent’ and almost 1% achieving an ‘Outstanding’. 9.6% of buildings achieved a ‘Pass’ and 8.9% achieving a ‘Good’ rating.

Fit-out

More than 97% of fit out projects have achieved at least a BREEAM ‘Very Good’ rating with 67% achieving a ‘Very Good’ rating and more than 30% achieving an ‘Excellent’ Rating, outperforming the typical rating achieved by refurbishment projects with a higher number of projects achieving an Excellent Rating and few achieving a ‘Pass’ or ‘Good’.

Pass 9.6% Good 2.3% Very Good 67% Excellent 30.2% Outstanding 0.7%

Fit-out

Pass 9.6% Good 8.9% Very Good 65.3% Excellent 10.4% Outstanding 0.2% Refurbishment

(4)

Part of the BRE Trust

P:4

Average BREEAM UK category score: Refurbishment

Refurbishment projects perform the best against the Land Use and Ecology, Management, Waste, Materials and Transport Categories, achieving at least 60% of the available score in each category. Some of this performance is likely to be attributed to the positive impacts that refurbishment typically has on retention of existing materials and minimising site impacts on ecology, due to the use of an existing developed site.

Refurbishment projects typically perform the worst against the Pollution, Energy and Health and Wellbeing categories. There are a range of reasons why refurbishment projects may not perform as well against these categories such as limitations with improving building fabric and existing site constraints. However, as indicated by the maximum score achieved this is not always the case with up to 91% being achieved for the energy section, 100% for the pollution category and 76% for the health and wellbeing category.

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Management

Health & wellbeing Energy Transport Water Materials Waste Pollution Land Use & Ecology

% score

Average and maximum % category scores achieved: Refurbishment

(5)

Average BREEAM UK category score: Fit-out

Fit-out projects have the highest performance in the Waste, Materials and Management categories with more than 75% of the available category score being achieved on average.

Fit-out projects tend to score less well against the Pollution, Water, Transport, Energy and Health and Wellbeing categories with less than 60% of category score being achieved. The energy category is the category with the lowest average performance with just over 40% of category score being achieved on average. However, as indicated by the maximum scores achieved up to 90% has been achieved in the energy category.

Further information

For further information on BREEAM Refurbishment including case studies on certificated refurbishment and fit-out projects see www.breeam.com/ndrefurb

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Management

Health & wellbeing Energy Transport Water Materials Waste Pollution % score Average and maximum % category score achieved: Fit-out

References

Related documents

Accordingly, we discuss the key work on managerial risk taking, idiosyncratic risk, information risk, accounting opacity, executive compensation, directors and

As we have seen, in the case of the shell language, when the lexer needs to know if a word must be promoted to a key- word or not, it must inspect the parser context to determine

Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) Federal Research Institute for Animal Health – Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut. Leibniz Institute for Agricultural

The Authority’s internal IT staff now use the management platforms to moni- tor internal network operations; SBC companies manage everything from the firewall out, along

The project complied with this subsection since the project was limited to the replacement and/or respacing of structures and the replacement of conductor along an existing route of

Milk enters the milkline from individual milking units at intervals of 65 to 120 cm (27 to 48 inches) in milking parlors and up to 240 cm (96 inches) in round-the-barn

This paper is organised as follows: Section 2 presents the survey strategy, observations, data reductions and quality as- sessments; Section 3 we present galaxy number counts and