• No results found

Austin Independent School District and NAEP TUDA

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Austin Independent School District and NAEP TUDA"

Copied!
11
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Austin

 

Independent

 

School

 

District

 

and

Atlanta Public Schools Viewed through

Atlanta

 

Public

 

Schools

 

Viewed

 

through

NAEP

 

TUDA

 

2005

2013

Prepared

 

March

 

30,

 

2014

 

by

 

Ed

 

Johnson

Advocate

 

for

 

Quality

 

in

 

Public

 

Education

Atlanta,

 

GA

edwjohnson@aol.com

(2)

Headed in a “positive” direction?

Headed

 

in

 

a

 

positive

 

direction?

Question

With b d i hi h di ti ill

– With everyone onboard , in which direction will any one passenger go?

Answer

– The direction in which the ship goes, although any passengers may at various times deliberately or randomly go here and there while aboard ship

Question

– Why might the ship go in a different direction?

Answer

h C i h ffi i k l d

– The Captain has new sufficient knowledge to change course. Not optimism, not pessimism, not ideology, not training; rather, knowledge

Question

– Does everyone know they are on the same ship, or not?

Answer

– How could they know?

(3)

National

 

Assessment

 

of

 

Education

 

Progress

 

(NAEP)

 

Trial Urban District

District

 

#

District

1

Albuquerque

2

A l

Trial

 

Urban

 

District

 

Assessment

 

(TUDA)

2

Atlanta

3

Austin

4

Baltimore

 

City

5

Boston

 Each chart in this presentation aims to tell a systemic story much at a glance, drawing the reader into light analyses if at all The

6

Charlotte

7

Chicago

8

Cleveland

9

Dallas

the reader into light analyses, if at all. The focus is Austin with respect to Atlanta.

 “Systemic” means all Trial Urban Districts (TUD) as a system, a particular TUD as a system, Reading as a system, Mathematics as

a system, 4th Grades as a system, and 8th

9

Dallas

10

Detroit

11

District

 

of

 

Columbia

 

(DCPS)

12

Fresno

13

Hillsborough County (FL)

y , y ,

Grades as a system. In no case does systemic mean students.

 NAEP TUDA defines scale scores for both Reading and Mathematics to range between zero and 500, inclusive.

13

Hillsborough

 

County

 

(FL)

14

Houston

15

Jefferson

 

County

 

(KY)

16

Los

 

Angeles

 This presentation looks at TUDA average scale scores that were generated by subject, grade, year, jurisdiction, and student‐ reported race/ethnicity using the NAEP Data Explorer, at

http://nces ed gov/nationsreportcard/naepdata/

17

Miami

Dade

18

Milwaukee

19

New

 

York

 

City

20

Philadelphia

http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/naepdata/

 Some charts in this presentation show District #’s instead of District names to avoid clutter.

 Refer to the table at the right to translate a District # into its District name

21

San

 

Diego

(4)

NAEP TUDA, Reading, 2002

2013

(5)

NAEP TUDA, Math, 2003

2013

(6)

NAEP TUDA, Reading, Grade 4, All Students

NAEP

 

TUDA,

 

Reading,

 

Grade

 

4,

 

All

 

Students

AISD

APS

AISD

UCL 226.3 CL 219 8 220 230

Yearly

 

Scale

 

Scores

 

(X)

APS

220 230

Yearly

 

Scale

 

Scores

 

(X)

CL 219.8 LCL 213.3 190 200 210 220

Meria Carstarphen as Superintendnet.

UCL 217.5 CL 208.7 LCL 199.8 190 200 210 220 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 10 12

Year

to

Year

 

Scale

 

Score

 

Ranges

 

(mR)

UCL 10.9

10 12

Yeat

to

Year

 

Scale

 

Score

 

Ranges

 

(mR)

UCL 8.0 CL 2.5 2 4 6 8 CL 3.3 2 4 6 8

(7)

NAEP TUDA, Reading, Grade 8, All Students

NAEP

 

TUDA,

 

Reading,

 

Grade

 

8,

 

All

 

Students

AISD

APS

AISD

UCL 262.8 CL 259 4 260 270

Yearly

 

Scale

 

Scores

 

(X)

APS

UCL 258 4

260 270

Yearly

 

Scale

 

Scores

 

(X)

CL 259.4 LCL 256.0 230 240 250 260

Meria Carstarphen as Superintendnet.

UCL 258.4 CL 248.3 LCL 238.3 230 240 250 260 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 12 14

Year

to

Year

 

Scale

 

Score

 

Ranges

 

(mR)

UCL 12.3

12 14

Year

to

Year

 

Scale

 

Score

 

Ranges

 

(mR)

UCL 4.2 CL 1.3 0 2 4 6 8 10 CL 3.8 0 2 4 6 8 10

What caused this 

“unusual” change?

(8)

NAEP TUDA, Math, Grade 4, All Students

NAEP

 

TUDA,

 

Math,

 

Grade

 

4,

 

All

 

Students

AISD

APS

AISD

UCL 247.2 CL 242.7 240 250

Yearly

 

Scale

 

Scores

 

(X)

APS

240 250

Yearly

 

Scale

 

Scores

 

(X)

LCL 238.2

210 220 230 240

Meria Carstarphen as Superintendnet. UCL 234.4

CL 226.2 LCL 218.0 210 220 230 240 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 10 12

Year

to

Year

 

Scale

 

Score

 

Ranges

 

(mR)

UCL 10.0

10 12

Year

to

Year

 

Scale

 

Score

 

Ranges

 

(mR)

UCL 5.6 CL 1.7 2 4 6 8 CL 3.1 2 4 6 8

(9)

NAEP TUDA, Math, Grade 8, All Students

NAEP

 

TUDA,

 

Math,

 

Grade

 

8,

 

All

 

Students

AISD

APS

AISD

UCL 290.4 CL 284.4 290 300

Yearly

 

Scale

 

Scores

 

(X)

APS

290 300

Yearly

 

Scale

 

Scores

 

(X)

LCL 278.5 230 240 250 260 270 280

Meria Carstarphen as Superintendnet.

UCL 273.1 CL 258.7 LCL 244.3 230 240 250 260 270 280 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 16 18 20

Year

to

Year

 

Scale

 

Score

 

Ranges

 

(mR)

UCL 17.7

16 18 20

Year

to

Year

 

Scale

 

Score

 

Ranges

 

(mR)

UCL 7.4 CL 2.2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 CL 5.4 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013

(10)

Some key considerations…

Some

 

key

 

considerations…

1. AISD wonders around the ship’s upper side without gaining systemic capability to improve, especially not since 2009.

2 ASID experienced usual increases in 2009 or 2011 save 2. ASID experienced usual increases in 2009 or 2011, save the “unusual” increase in 2009 in Reading, Grade 8, that warrants investigating.

3. APS moved from the ship’s lower side to its upper side in a continuous, non‐random way that may come to warrant investigating

warrant investigating.

4. APS stands to “jump ship” and go in a more quality improvement direction than does ASID.

5. Thinking APS needs a “turn around” or “fix it” strategy based in “choice” is unwarranted.

6 Thinking APS needs a superintendency focused on 6. Thinking APS needs a superintendency focused on

“urban school reform” is unwarranted.

7. Thinking APS needs an unconventional Systems Thinking superintendency to lead it out of the “urban” education isolationism that keeps its doomed to remain aboard ship is warranted

ship is warranted.

8. Systems Thinkers are unlikely to be among any “urban” education isolationists onboard ship.

(11)

References

Related documents

Global miR expression and expression of all 39 HOX genes in normal oral keratinocytes (NOKs), oral pre-malignant (OPM) and HNSCC cells was assessed by expression microarray and qPCR

This corresponds to the purely classical analysis of Sampson (1991) who shows for both the unit root and the trend-stationary models, that the sampling theoretic

We show how the Prime Number Theorem can be used to support this conjecture, and how the Mersenne sequence is a special case of a class of linear recurrence sequences which were

704.07 (3) or breaches any covenant or condition of the tenant's lease, other than for payment of rent, the tenant's tenancy is terminated if the landlord gives the tenant a

Scope of practice has become a particularly important issue for advanced practice nurses (and for certain other health professionals such as physician assistants)

By having our staff of 26 service engineers strategically placed throughout the region, Capital Machine provides more service and support than any other vendor!. Capital

Fresh Produce, Fresh Start was a pilot farm to family study which tested the effectiveness of a local produce delivery program on dietary intake of Head Start participants..

In 1938 in British Mandate Palestine, British army officer Orde Wingate organised and led a joint British-Jewish military unit, the Special Night Squads (SNSs), to defeat