• No results found

Trapping and the Detection, Control, and Regulation of Tephritid Fruit Flies

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Trapping and the Detection, Control, and Regulation of Tephritid Fruit Flies"

Copied!
15
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Trapping and the Detection, Control, and

Regulation of Tephritid Fruit Flies

(2)

Fly species (photo credit):

Top row (left to right): Rhagoletis pomonella(Juan Rull),Ceratitis capitata

(Giovanni Benelli), Ceratitis rosa (Robert Copeland)

Middle row: Anastrepha ludens (Ana Rodriguez), Anastrepha

fraterculus (M.Teresa Vera), Bactrocera oleae

(Giovanni Benelli)

Bottom row: Bactrocera tryoni (Jaye Newman), Bactrocera

cucurbitae (Ana Rodriguez), Bactrocera dorsalis

(Ana Rodriguez)

(3)

Todd Shelly • Nancy Epsky • Eric B. Jang •

Jesus Reyes-Flores • Roger Vargas

Editors

Trapping and the Detection,

Control, and Regulation of

Tephritid Fruit Flies

Lures, Area-Wide Programs, and

Trade Implications

(4)

Editors

Todd Shelly APHIS

United States Department of Agriculture Waimanalo, Hawaii, USA

Nancy Epsky ARS

United States Department of Agriculture Miami, Florida, USA

Eric B. Jang ARS

United States Department of Agriculture Hilo, Hawaii, USA

Jesus Reyes-Flores Insect Pest Control Section

International Atomic Energy Agency Food and Agriculture Organization Vienna, Austria

Roger Vargas ARS

United States Department of Agriculture Hilo, Hawaii, USA

ISBN 978-94-017-9192-2 ISBN 978-94-017-9193-9 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-9193-9

Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London

Library of Congress Control Number: 2014947215

©Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht (outside the USA) 2014

Chapters 1, 3, 9, 10, 12, 14, 16 and 17 was created within the capacity of an US government employment. US copyright protection does not apply.

©Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center. Violations are liable to prosecution under the respective Copyright Law.

The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.

While the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication, neither the authors nor the editors nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein.

Printed on acid-free paper

(5)

Dedicated to the Memory of Robert R. Heath

[1945–2011] and Donald A. Lindquist

[1930–2011]

Bob Heath’s expertise in the development and

application of insect semiochemicals along

with Don Lindquist’s vision and coordination

of full scale multinational programs to test

novel approaches have resulted in substantial

advances in the use of trapping for tephritid

fruit fly detection and control.

(6)
(7)

Preface

This project emerged from three simple facts: (i) Certain species of tephritid fruit flies are among the world’s most notorious pests of commercially important fruits and vegetables; (ii) trapping these flies is vital to identifying infestations, control-ling detected populations, and establishing guidelines for international transport of agricultural commodities; and (iii) despite its central role, there exists no compre-hensive repository of factual or theoretical material relating specifically to trapping issues for economically important Tephritidae. While the editors (and we assume many of the authors) would admit to a scientific fascination with this group of insects, production of a volume devoted strictly to trapping of a relatively small number of pest species reflects, not just this scientific curiosity, but also the serious impact these pests have on global commerce. As Aldo Malavasi notes in his Introductory Remarks, every major fruit and vegetable growing county in the world maintains some program relating to surveillance and control of tephritid fruit fly pests. Thus, trapping issues concern scientists, regulatory agencies, and trade organizations in countries of every continent, from Australia and Brazil through the alphabet to Yemen and Zimbabwe.

We thank all the authors for their contributions, which were produced without financial compensation. Collectively, they exhibited a spirit of industry, coopera-tion, and patience that smoothed the task of editing. We extend special thanks to A. Malavasi, who graciously provided introductory remarks. TS also thanks J.C. Stewart, who allowed him time to initiate and complete this project.

Each chapter was reviewed by at least one editor and at least one external reviewer. We extend deep appreciation and gratitude to the following individuals, who served as reviewers: R. Dowell, J. Duan, R. Duthie, W. Enkerlin, Y. Gazit, S. Geib, T. Holler, P. Kendra, L. Leblanc, A. Liebhold, N. Manoukis, A. Manrakhan, D. McInnis, M. De Meyer, D. Midgarden, S. Myers, A. Norrbom, J. Pin˜ero, J. Rojas, D. Rubinoff, M. San Jose, D. M. Suckling, S. Thornsbury, M. Virgilio, T. Yamanaka, B. Yuval, and J. L. Zavala Lopez.

We also thank those who graciously provided the photos appearing in the preceding gallery.

(8)

Our goal was to produce a comprehensive synthesis of tephritid-centric trapping issues, and accordingly the topics included are far-ranging and address lures and traps, population ecology and detection, suppression and eradication strategies, and regulatory issues. We hope we have achieved this goal and that this volume proves useful for years to come.

Waimanalo, HI, USA Todd Shelly

Miami, FL, USA Nancy Epsky

Hilo, HI, USA Eric B. Jang

Vienna, Austria Jesus Reyes-Flores

Hilo, HI, USA Roger Vargas

(9)

Introductory Remarks

From an economic point of view, true fruit flies are, by far, the most important insect family attacking horticultural crops. Tephritid flies cause both direct losses and also indirect losses as their presence can result in major international trading constraints. Total damage caused in all production, harvesting, packing, and mar-keting worldwide is estimated to amount to more than 2 billion dollars annually. Their economic and trading importance is so high that in every fruit growing country there is at least one unit dedicated to fruit fly detection and control under the National Plant Protection Organization.

In this context, an essential issue is to determine the density and distribution of fruit fly populations in the field. In all cases, fly populations vary from zero to high numbers, depending on many factors, but mainly host availability and climate conditions. All this critical information, obtained mainly through trapping, is required to design the most effective strategies in order to suppress or eliminate the population.

The big challenge for researchers and managers of action programs is to choose the best trapping system available for a particular growing area or region and for a specific fruit fly species or group of species. Four critical parameters are involved: trap type, fly attractant, trap density, and service interval. Once such parameters are defined, the operation and logistics of the surveillance network need to be planned to provide the most accurate possible estimates of the actual fruit fly populations in the field – whether an orchard or vegetable field, natural vegetation or an urban area, or an area-wide landscape that includes a mosaic of these different types of areas.

Defining the optimal trap type and fly attractant is an endless task. Both by chance or by active search, many researchers in all countries are deeply involved in developing more effective, selective, inexpensive, and easier to handle combina-tions of trap and attractant. A huge number of solucombina-tions can be found in the literature or in local/regional fruit fly manuals. However, there is a worldwide effort to harmonize the solutions in order to have comparable data that can be internationally recognized.

(10)

The fruit fly trapping system selected affects a wide range of stakeholders and interests, from the government officer in charge of a detection program, to the grower that needs to know the population density in his orchard to start control measures, and up to the packers and trading partners who import or export horti-cultural products.

With the ever increasing invasive process linked to globalization, resulting in the movement of exotic fruit flies to all corners of the world, reliable detection pro-grams are essential to plant protection services with the responsibility to safeguard their countries from unwanted new fruit fly pests.

Furthermore, many exporting programs must have in place an efficient trapping system to help both growers and inspectors make the right decisions regarding the fresh fruit to be exported. Also, in cases of a systems approach, where a low resident adult population is acceptable, the monitoring of fruit flies is a critical issue to guarantee the quality of the commodity. In countries or regions considered fruit fly free, an essential component is a surveillance system to demonstrate to trading partners the absence of the target species.

In conclusion, the establishment of a trapping system should take into consid-eration many elements from natural history to genetics and modeling, from design to cost and logistics, from international plant protection standards to international trade, and this exhaustive book will be an extremely valuable source of information for all readers in this respect.

Many experts with deep knowledge and actual field experience on fruit fly trapping contributed to this book. Here, for the first time, very valuable information often not found in the refereed literature is consolidated, reviewed and synthesized, not only for the fruit fly community – fruit fly technical officers, plant protection inspectors, trappers in charge of surveillance and managers that need to update their trapping program – but also for common growers and academic researchers with interest on fruit fly biology. The editors of this book are commended for their comprehensive effort.

Biofabrica Moscamed Brazil, Juazeiro, BA, Brazil Aldo Malavasi

(11)

Contents

Part I Introduction

1 Fruit Fly Alphabets. . . 3 Todd E. Shelly

Part II Lures and Traps

2 Pheromones, Male Lures, and Trapping of Tephritid

Fruit Flies. . . 15 Keng Hong Tan, Ritsuo Nishida, Eric B. Jang, and Todd E. Shelly

3 History and Development of Food-Based Attractants. . . 75 Nancy D. Epsky, Paul E. Kendra, and Elena Q. Schnell

4 Plant Odors as Fruit Fly Attractants. . . 119 Serge Quilici, Toulassi Atiama-Nurbel, and Thierry Bre´vault

5 Interactions Between Tephritid Fruit Fly Physiological State and Stimuli from Baits and Traps: Looking for the Pied Piper

of Hamelin to Lure Pestiferous Fruit Flies. . . 145 Francisco Dı´az-Fleischer, Jaime C. Pin˜ero, and Todd E. Shelly

Part III Ecology and Detection

6 Trapping to Monitor Tephritid Movement: Results, Best

Practice, and Assessment of Alternatives. . . 175 Christopher W. Weldon, Mark K. Schutze, and Minette Karsten

7 Fruit Fly Invasion: Historical, Biological, Economic Aspects

and Management. . . 219 Nikos T. Papadopoulos

(12)

8 Fruit Fly Detection Programs: The Potentials and Limitations

of Trap Arrays. . . 253 A. Meats

9 Spatial Analysis of Tephritid Fruit Fly Traps. . . 277 David Midgarden, Estuardo Lira, and Micha Silver

10 Using Molecules to Identify the Source of Fruit Fly Invasions. . . 321 Norman Barr, Raul Ruiz-Arce, and Karen Armstrong

11 Modeling Trapping of Fruit Flies for Detection, Suppression,

or Eradication. . . 379 Hugh J. Barclay and Jorge Hendrichs

Part IV Attract and Kill

12 Priorities in Formulation and Activity of Adulticidal Insecticide

Bait Sprays for Fruit Flies. . . 423 Robert L. Mangan

13 Recent Developments and Applications of Bait Stations

for Integrated Pest Management of Tephritid Fruit Flies. . . 457 Jaime C. Pin˜ero, Walther Enkerlin, and Nancy D. Epsky

14 Male Annihilation, Past, Present, and Future. . . 493 Roger I. Vargas, Luc Leblanc, Jaime C. Pin˜ero,

and Kevin M. Hoffman

15 Mass Trapping for Fruit Fly Control. . . 513 Vicente Navarro-Llopis and Sandra Vacas

Part V Phytosanitary Programs and Regulations

16 Integrating Tephritid Trapping into Phytosanitary Programs. . . 559 D.R. Lance

17 Trapping Related to Phytosanitary Status and Trade. . . 589 Eric B. Jang, Walther Enkerlin, Charles “Ed” Miller,

and Jesus Reyes-Flores Part VI Coda

18 The Complexities of Knowing What It Is You Are Trapping. . . 611 Anthony R. Clarke and Mark K. Schutze

Index. . . 633

(13)

Contributors

Karen Armstrong Bio-Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, Lincoln, Christchurch, New Zealand

Toulassi Atiama-Nurbel CIRAD, UMR PVBMT CIRAD/Universite´ de La Re´union, Saint-Pierre, La Re´union, France

Hugh J. Barclay Victoria, BC, Canada

Norman B. Barr Center for Plant Health Science and Technology, Mission Laboratory, USDA-APHIS-PPQ-CPHST, Edinburg, TX, USA

Thierry Bre´vault CIRAD, UR AIDA, Montpellier, France

Anthony R. Clarke School of Earth, Environmental and Biological Sciences, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Francisco Dı´az-Fleischer Instituto de Biotecnologia Aplicada (INBIOTECA), Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Veracruz, Me´xico

Walther Enkerlin Programa Regional Moscamed, Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala

Nancy D. Epsky Subtropical Horticultural Research Station, USDA-ARS, Miami, FL, USA

Jorge Hendrichs Insect Pest Control Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria

Kevin M. Hoffman California Department of Food and Agriculture, Pest Detec-tion/Emergency Projects, Sacramento, CA, USA

Eric B. Jang USDA-ARS, Daniel K. Inouye, U.S. Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center, Hilo, HI, USA

(14)

Minette Karsten Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Univer-sity of Stellenbosch, Matieland, South Africa

Paul E. Kendra Subtropical Horticultural Research Station, USDA-ARS, Miami, FL, USA

David R. Lance USDA-APHIS-PPQ-CPHST, Otis Laboratory, Buzzards Bay, MA, USA

Luc Leblanc Department of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences, Col-lege of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii, Hono-lulu, HI, USA

Estuardo Lira USDA-APHIS-IS Medfly Program, Guatemala City, Guatemala Aldo Malavasi Biofabrica Moscamed Brazil, Juazeiro, BA, Brazil

Robert L. Mangan Subtropical Horticultural Research Station, USDA-ARS, Miami, FL, USA

Alan Meats School of Biological Sciences A12, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

David Midgarden USDA-APHIS-IS Medfly Program, Guatemala City, Guatemala

Charles “Ed” Miller Frederick, MD, USA

Vicente Navarro-Llopis Instituto Agroforestal del Mediterra´neo-Universidad Polite´cnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Ritsuo Nishida Graduate School of Agriculture, Laboratory of Chemical Ecology, Pesticide Research Institute, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan

Nikos T. Papadopoulos Department of Agriculture, Laboratory of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Crop Production and Rural Environment, University of Thessaly, Magnisias, Greece

Jaime C. Pin˜ero Cooperative Research and Extension, Lincoln University, Jef-ferson City, MO, USA

Serge Quilici CIRAD, UMR PVBMT CIRAD/Universite´ de La Re´union, Saint-Pierre, La Re´union, France

Jesus Reyes-Flores Insect Pest Control Section, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria

Raul Ruiz-Arce Center for Plant Health Science and Technology, Mission Lab-oratory, USDA-APHIS-PPQ-CPHST, Edinburg, TX, USA

Elena Q. Schnell Subtropical Horticultural Research Station, USDA-ARS, Miami, FL, USA

(15)

Mark K. Schutze School of Earth, Environmental and Biological Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Todd E. Shelly USDA-APHIS-PPQ-CPHST, Waimanalo, HI, USA Micha Silver Arava Development Company, Sapir, Israel

Keng Hong Tan Tan Hak Heng, Tanjong Bungah, Penang, Malaysia

Sandra Vacas Instituto Agroforestal del Mediterra´neo-Universidad Polite´cnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Roger I. Vargas United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center, Hilo, HI, USA

Christopher W. Weldon Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, South Africa

References

Related documents

Specific and sensitive primers for the detection of predated olive fruit flies, Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae).. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, Volume 15,

Despite these studies, there is little knowledge among stakeholders about fruit fly pests in terms of the economically important species, their pest status,

Losses caused by fruit flies and average sale prices for fruits of seven main mango cultivars found in five orchards studied in the Borgou department (Benin, 2006 mango

Fruit flies associated with mango such as Bactrocera invadens, Ceratitis cosyra, Ceratitis bremii were present in varied proportions in orchards under insecticide

In present study total 09 species of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) were reported from Poonch division of Azad Jammu and Kashmir.. The captured flies mostly contained

Using tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) as a reference species, the present review aims to revisit the mechanisms by which ethylene regulates fruit ripening by taking advantage of new tools

Dacus (Bactrocera) opiliae , a new sibling species of the dorsalis complex of fruit flies from northern Australia (Diptera: Tephritidae).. The fruit fly fauna

Comparative sensitivity to and consumption of methyl eugenol in three Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) complex sibling species. Fruit Flies of Economic