• No results found

Solution. The premium is simply the Loss Cost grossed up for expenses: $ $

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Solution. The premium is simply the Loss Cost grossed up for expenses: $ $"

Copied!
10
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Solution.

The premium is simply the Loss Cost grossed up for expenses: $382.78

(2)

At ABC insurance company, for accident year 2007, the expected loss ratio was 64% and earned premium was $20,890,000. Through the first year of development, to 12/31/2008, cumulative paid losses were $11,987,654. Historical loss development factors are given as: 1/0 = 1.35; 2/1=1.11; 3/2=1.05; 4/3=1.02. All claims are fully developed after 5 years. Determine the estimated loss reserve for 12/31/2008 using the expected loss ratio method.

Solution:

The Estimated Ultimate Losses (EUL), after claims are fully developed, equal premiums times expected loss ratio, and in this case this equals

EUL = $20,890,000⋅0.64 = $13,369,600.

This is the amount we expect to pay in total over 5 years. But in 2008, cumulative amount of payments due to claims are $11,987,654, so the reserve is equal to the Estimated Ultimate Losses minus the amount already paid:

(3)

Determine the estimated loss reserve for 12/31/2008 using the chain ladder method. Solution.

For chain ladder method, the Estimated Ultimate Losses (EUL) are equal to the Cumulative Paid Losses (CPL) given in some year, transformed to the end of the claim development period by using historical loss development factors. Since we are given CPL in 2008, the first development factor from 2007 to 2008 is already built in into the value 11,987,654. We have

EUL = $11, 987, 654⋅1.11⋅1.05⋅1.02≈$14, 251, 043. The loss reserve equals the difference of EUL and CPL:

(4)

At ABC insurance company, for accident year 2007, the expected loss ratio was 64% and earned premium was $20,890,000. Through the first year of development, to 12/31/2008, cumulative paid losses were $11,987,654. Historical loss development factors are given as: 1/0 = 1.35; 2/1=1.11; 3/2=1.05; 4/3=1.02. All claims are fully developed after 5 years. Determine the estimated loss reserve using the Bornhuetter-Ferguson Method.

Solution.

Using the Bornhuetter-Ferguson Method,

Estimated Loss Reserve = EUL ⋅ (1-(1/ fult)), where EUL is computed as in Loss Ratio Method:

EUL = $20,890,000⋅0.64 = $13,369,600.

Note that fultis the factor we would use to compute the EUL in chain ladder method, so ult

f = 1.11⋅1.05⋅1.02 = 1.18881. Substituting these values, we obtain:

(5)

12/2008 3067137 393726 215260 19569 01/2009 3375641 373608 274829

02/2009 4441270 490330 03/2009 4763283

Using the chain ladder method,a reasonable set of loss-development factors are 1.116 for 1/0, 1.068 for 2/1, and 1.005 for 3/2. Using these loss-development factors, determine an estimated loss reserve at 03/2009.

Solution.

Cumulative Claim Payments

Claim Month 0 1 2 3

12/2008 3067137 3460863 3676123 3695692 01/2009 3375641 3749249 4024078

02/2009 4441270 4931600 03/2009 4763283

Based on this, we calculate the reserve as of 03/2009, first separately for each claim month:

01/2009:4024078⋅1.005−4024078=20120,

02/3009:4931600⋅1.068⋅1.005−4931600=361684, 03/2009:4763283⋅1.116⋅1.068⋅1.005−4763283=942403. Total reserve is:

(6)

You are given the following tables of cumulative amounts paid Development Year

Accident year 0 1 2 3 Paid as of

12/31/2009

2006 260 330 360 390 390

2007 300 360 400 380

2008 330 430 420

2009 350 150

You are also given these incurred development factors 0/1: 1.2 1/2: 1.1 2/3: 1.1

Calculate the IBNR reserve as of 12/31/2009. Solution.

Using the development factors we complete the table Development Year Accident year 0 1 2 3 2006 260 330 360 390 2007 300 360 400 1.1⋅400=440 2008 330 430 1.1⋅430=473 1.1⋅473=520.3 2009 350 1.2⋅350 1.1⋅420=462 1.1⋅462=508.2 =420 The total ultimate amount paid is

390+440+520.3+508.2=1858.5.

The amount already paid is

390 + 380 + 420 + 150 = 1340. The IBNR reserve is 1858.5 – 1340 = 518.5.

(7)

What is New Average Gross Rate? Solution.

New Average Loss Cost = Expected Losses in Effective Period (Trended and Developed) / Number of Earned Exposure Units

So …

New Average Loss Cost = $195,490/168.52 = $1160.04 Furthermore

New Average Gross Rate = New Average Loss Cost / Permissible Loss Ratio Thus

(8)

You Bet Your Car Insurance Co. paid $275,000 of losses in 2001, its unpaid loss reserves were $1,200,000 on December 31, 2000, and they increased by 10% by the end of 2001. Find the total amount of losses incurred by this company in 2001.

Solution. We have

Incurred losses (2001) = Paid Losses (2001) + ΔReserves (2001) so that

(9)

Present average manual rate 45 Permissible loss ratio (equal to 1 – Expense ratio) 0.70 Solution.

This can be calculated using the lost cost method and the loss ratio method. Either solution will lead to the same result, as you have learned. First, we consider the loss cost method, as follows:

Expected Effective Loss Cost= Expected Effective Incurred Loss Earned Exposure Units = = 30, 000, 000

1, 000, 000 =30,

Indicated Average Gross Rate= Expected Effective Loss Cost Permissible Loss Ratio =

30

0.70 =42.86. Alternatively, using the loss ratio method:

Expected Effective Loss Ratio= Expected Effective Incurred Loss Earned Premiums at Current Rates = = 30, 000, 000

45, 000, 000 =0.6666... Indicated Rate Change Factor= Expected Effective Loss Ratio

Permissible Loss Ratio −1= = 0.6666...

0.70 −1=−0.04762. Indicated Average Gross Rate= 45⋅

(

1−0.04762

)

=42.86.

(10)

A homeowner has a house valued at 400,000, but has insured it for 250,000 with an insurer that requires 80% of full coverage before it reimburses losses in full. If coverage is less than 80% of full coverage, then any loss is reimbursed of a pro-rata basis of what would have been paid had the 80% requirement been met. The homeowner has a kitchen fire estimated at 40,000 on a replacement cost basis. How much will the insurer pay toward reimbursing the homeowner for this loss?

Solution.

For full coverage, the homeowner needed insurance equal to at least 80% of 400,000, i.e., 320,000, as measured at the time of the loss. But there was only 250,000 worth of

coverage, i.e., 78.125% of what was needed. For this 40,000 kitchen fire loss, the insurer will pay 78.125% of 40,000, i.e., 31,250.

References

Related documents

effect of government spending on infrastructure, human resources, and routine expenditures and trade openness on economic growth where the types of government spending are

The summary resource report prepared by North Atlantic is based on a 43-101 Compliant Resource Report prepared by M. Holter, Consulting Professional Engineer,

The key segments in the mattress industry in India are; Natural latex foam, Memory foam, PU foam, Inner spring and Rubberized coir.. Natural Latex mattresses are

Minors who do not have a valid driver’s license which allows them to operate a motorized vehicle in the state in which they reside will not be permitted to operate a motorized

Newby indicated that he had no problem with the Department’s proposed language change.. O’Malley indicated that the language reflects the Department’s policy for a number

Goals of education programs targeting marginalized children were to improve the quality of education, to improve children’s educational achievement in their public schools, and to

LCOE ranges by individual variable sensitivities, showing all financing structures The results of the individual variable sensitivity analysis indicate that among the input

aggressive variant with a propensity for distant metastases and a high probability of prostate cancer-related death (Kishan et al. The optimal management of very high-risk