• No results found

Portfolio Loss Distribution

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Portfolio Loss Distribution"

Copied!
27
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)
(2)

Risky assets in loan portfolio

• highly illiquid assets

• “hold-to-maturity” in the bank’s balance sheet

Outstandings

The portion of the bank asset that has already been extended to borrowers.

Commitment

A commitment is an amount the bank has committed to lend. Should the borrower encounter financial difficulties, it would draw on this committed line of credit.

(3)

Adjusted exposure and

expected loss

Let α be the amount of drawn down or usage given default.

Asset value at later time H, VH

Outstanding + α × commitment, Risky

(1−α) commitment, Riskless

Adjusted exposure is the risky part of VH.

Expected loss = adjusted exposure × loss given default × probability of default

* Normally, practitioners treat the uncertain draw-down rate as a known function of the obligor’s end-of-horizon credit class rating.

(4)

Example

calculation of expected loss

$6,188

Expected loss

50%

Loss given default for non-secured asset

0.15%

EDF for internal rating = 3

$8,250,000

Adjusted exposure on default

65%

Unused drawn-down on default

(for internal rating = 3)

Non-secured

Type

1 year

Maturity

3

Internal risk rating

$3,000,000

Outstanding

$10,000,000

Commitment

(5)

Unexpected loss

Unexpected loss is the estimated volatility of the potential loss in value of the asset around its expected loss.

2 EDF 2 2 LGD LGD EDF×σ + ×σ × = AE UL where EDF). -(1 EDF 2 EDF = × σ

Assumptions

* The random risk factors contributing to an obligor’s default (resulting in EDF) are statistically independent of the severity of loss (as given by LGD).

(6)

Example on unexpected

loss calculation

* The calculated unexpected loss is 2.16% of the adjusted exposure, while the expected loss is only 0.075%

$178,511

Unexpected loss

25%

σ

LGD

50%

LGD

3.87%

σ

EDF

0.15%

EDF

$8,250,000

Adjusted exposure

(7)

Comparison between expected

loss and unexpected loss

* The higher the recovery rate (lower LGD), the lower is the percentage loss for both EL and UL.

* EL increases linearly with decreasing credit quality (with increasing EDF)

* UL increases much faster than EL with increasing EDF.

Percentage loss per unit of adjusted loss

10%

5%

EL UL

(8)

Assets with varying terms

of maturity

* The longer the term to maturity, the greater the variation in asset value due to changes in credit quality.

* The two-state default process paradigm inherently ignores the credit losses associated with defaults that occur beyond the analysis horizon.

* To mitigate some of the maturity effect, banks commonly adjust a risky asset’s internal credit class rating in accordance with its terms to maturity.

(9)

Portfolio expected loss

i i i i i i p EL AE LGD EDF EL =

=

× ×

where ELp is the expected loss for the portfolio,

AEi is the risky portion of the terminal value of the ith asset to which the bank is exposed in the event of default.

We may write

= i i i i p p AE EL w AE EL

where the weights refer to

. AE AE AE AE p i i i i i w = =

(10)

i AEi wi ELi ELi/AEi 1 $10 M 0.5 $1 0.1 2 $4 M 0.2 $0.5 0.125 3 $6 M 0.3 $0.6 0.1 M 20 $ =

AEi

wi =1 i i i i i p i p i p p AE EL w AE EL AE AE AE EL AE EL = = =

105 . 0 1 . 0 3 . 0 125 . 0 2 . 0 1 . 0 5 . 0 × + × + × = = p p AE EL

(11)

Portfolio unexpected loss

portfolio unexpected loss = =

∑∑

i j j i j i ij p w w UL UL UL ρ where 2 E 2 2 LGD L EDF AE UL i i i DF i i i = × ×σ + GD ×σ

and ρij is the correlation of default between asset i and asset j. Due to diversification effect, we expect

. UL UL <<

i i p

(12)

Risk contribution

The risk contribution of a risky asset i to the portfolio unexpected loss is defined to be the incremental risk that the exposure of a single asset contributes to the portfolio’s total risk.

i p i i UL UL UL RC ∂ ∂ =

and it can be shown that

. UL UL UL RC p j ij j i i

= ρ

(13)

Undiversifiable risk

The risk contribution is a measure of the undiversifiable risk of an asset in the portfolio – the amount of credit risk which cannot be diversified away by placing the asset in the portfolio.

= i i p RC UL

To incorporate industry correlation, using i industry α and

j industry β . U ) 1 ( U U U RC             + − =

∑ ∑

≠ ∈ ∈ αβ α β β αα α ρ ρ k k i p i i L L L L

(14)

Calculation of EL, UL and RC

for a two-asset portfolio

risk contribution from Exposure 2 RC2

risk contribution from Exposure 1 RC1

portfolio unexpected loss ULp

ELp = EL1 + EL2

portfolio expected loss ELp

default correlation between the two exposures

ρ 2 1 2 2 2 1 UL 2 UL UL UL ULp = + + ρ p UL / ) UL UL ( UL RC1 = 1 1 + ρ 2 p UL / ) UL UL ( UL RC2 = 2 2 + ρ 1 ULp = RC1 + RC2 ULp << UL1 + UL2

(15)

Fitting of loss distribution

The two statistical measures about the credit portfolio are

• portfolio expected loss;

• portfolio unexpected loss.

At the simplest level, the beta distribution may be chosen to fit the portfolio loss distribution.

Reservation A beta distribution with only two degrees of freedom is perhaps insufficient to give an adequate description of the tail events in the loss distribution.

(16)

Beta distribution

The density function of a beta distribution is

     > > < < − = − − Γ Γ + Γ otherwise 0 0 , 0 1 0 , ) 1 ( ) , , ( 1 1 ) ( ) ( ) ( β α β α β α β αα β x x x x F

Mean and variance

β α α µ + = . ) 1 ( ) ( 2 2 + + + = β α β α αβ σ 1 x f(x, α, β)

(17)

Economic Capital

If XT is the random variable for loss and z is the percentage probability (confidence level), what is the quantity v of minimum economic capital EC needed to protect the bank from insolvency at the time horizon T such that

Here, z is the desired debt rating of the bank, say, 99.97% for an AA rating.

. ]

(18)

XT

frequency of loss

ULp

ELp

(19)

Capital multiplier

Given a desired level of z, what is EC such that

. ]

EC EL

Pr[XTp ≤ = z

Let CM (capital multiplier) be defined by

p UL CM EC = × then . CM UL EL Pr X z p p T =         ≤ −

(20)

Monte Carol simulation

of loss distribution of a portfolio

2. Estimate asset correlation

between obligors

Determine pairwise asset correlation whenever possible OR

Assign obligors to industry groupings, then determine industry pair correlation 1. Estimate default and

losses

Assign risk ratings to loss facilities and

determine their default probability

+ Assign LGD and σLGD

(21)

Simulate default point + Decomposition of covariance matrix + Correlated default events + Determine stochastic loss given default

4. Generate correlated default events

3. Generate random loss

(22)

6. Loss distribution Construct simulated portfolio loss distribution 5. Loss calculation Calculate facility loss for each

scenario and obtain portfolio loss

(23)

Generation of correlated

default events

• Generate a set of random numbers drawn from a standard normal distribution.

• Perform a decomposition (Cholesky, SVD or eigenvalue) on the asset correlation matrix to transform the independent set of random numbers (stored in the vector ) into a set of correlated asset

values (stored in the vector ). Here, the transformation matrix is M, where

The covariance matrix and M are related by

. ∑ = M M T ee ′ e = M .e

(24)

Calculation of the

default point

The default point threshold, DP, of the ith obligor can be defined as DP = N−1(EDFi, 0, 1). The criterion of default for the ith obligor is

default if no default if i i < DP ' e . ' i iDP e

(25)

Generate loss given default

The LGD is a stochastic variable with an unknown distribution.

A typical example may be

28 50 50 unsecured 21 35 65 secured σLGD (%) LGD (%) Recovery rate (%) s i s i LGD f LGD LGD = + ×σ

where fi is drawn from a uniform distribution whose range is selected so that the resulting LGD has a standard deviation that is consistent with historical observation.

(26)

Calculation of loss

Summing all the simulated losses from one single scenario

LGD exposure Adjusted Loss default in Obligors × =

i

Simulated loss distribution

The simulated loss distribution is obtained by repeating the above process sufficiently number of times.

(27)

Features of portfolio risk

• The variability of default risk within a portfolio is substantial.

• The correlation between default risks is generally low.

• The default risk itself is dynamic and subject to large fluctuations.

Default risks can be effectively managed through diversification.

• Within a well-diversified portfolio, the loss behavior is

characterized by lower than expected default credit losses for much of the time, but very large losses which are incurred infrequently.

References

Related documents

For the poorest farmers in eastern India, then, the benefits of groundwater irrigation have come through three routes: in large part, through purchased pump irrigation and, in a

When a high voltage is applied between the two electrodes immersed in a gaseous medium, the gas becomes a conductor and an electrical breakdown occurs. The

Where the void beneath the base plate is greater than the maximum allowable grout thickness (please refer to the Product Data Sheet) place the epoxy grout in successive layers or

Actual dividend performance varies based on the product a policyowner owns, but Northwestern Mutual pays more in total life, disability income and annuity dividends than the

To achieve the load balancing we determine the sub-domains by using the Morton ordering so that the number of cells and the particle loads becomes uniform between processors as

Three mechanical harvesting systems for olives have been tested in field trials in the two main Portuguese regions of olive production: Trás-os-Montes and Alentejo.. These tests

One of t h e Italian flamethrower tanks, manned by a Spanish driver and an Italian gunner, moved up boldly to within several meters of the enemy, but it was soon destroyed by

Phylogenetic analyses based on amino acid sequences of five conserved genes, including the ATPase subunit of the terminase, confirm the position of AngHV1 within the