• No results found

GENERALIZED DOUBLE SEQUENCE SPACE DERIVED BY USING SUMMABILITY MATRIX AND DOUBLE SEQUENCE OF MODULUS FUNCTIONS OVER n NORMED SPACES

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "GENERALIZED DOUBLE SEQUENCE SPACE DERIVED BY USING SUMMABILITY MATRIX AND DOUBLE SEQUENCE OF MODULUS FUNCTIONS OVER n NORMED SPACES"

Copied!
14
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

GENERALIZED DOUBLE SEQUENCE SPACE DERIVED BY USING

SUMMABILITY MATRIX AND DOUBLE SEQUENCE OF MODULUS

FUNCTIONS OVER n-NORMED SPACES

Ado Balili and Ahmadu Kiltho

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we introduce some double sequence spaces derived by using four dimensional summability matrix and double sequence of modulus functions β„³ = (π‘€π‘˜π‘™) over n-normed spaces, We study some topological properties and a few inclusion relations between these spaces.

KEYWORDS: Double sequence space, Orlicz function, P-convergence, summability matrix

Mathematical Subject Classification: 40A05 40C05 46A45

INTRODUCTION

The concept of 2- normed space was initially developed by GΓ€hler [1] in the mid of 1960’s, while that of n- normed spaces one can see in Misiak [2]. Since then, many others have studied this concept and obtained various results, see Gunawan ( [3], [4]) and Gunawan and Mashadi [5] and various references therein.

International Research Journal of Mathematics, Engineering and IT ISSN: (2349-0322) Impact Factor- 5.489, Volume 4, Issue 12, December 2017 Website- www.aarf.asia, Email : [email protected] , [email protected]

(2)

Let 𝑛 βˆˆβ„• and X be a linear spaces over the field K, where K is the field of real or complex numbers of dimension 𝑑 π‘€π‘•π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ 𝑑 β‰₯ 𝑛 β‰₯ 2. A real valued function . , … , . on 𝑋𝑛 satisfying

the following four conditions:

1 π‘₯1, π‘₯2, … , π‘₯𝑛 = 0, 𝑖𝑓 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘œπ‘›π‘™π‘¦ 𝑖𝑓π‘₯1, π‘₯2, … , π‘₯𝑛 are linear dependent in X.

2 π‘₯1, π‘₯2, … , π‘₯𝑛 is invariant under permutation

3 𝛼π‘₯1, π‘₯2, … , π‘₯𝑛 = 𝛼 π‘₯1, π‘₯2, … , π‘₯𝑛 , π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘Žπ‘›π‘¦ 𝛼 ∈ 𝐾

4 π‘₯ + π‘₯β€², π‘₯2, … , π‘₯𝑛 ≀ π‘₯, π‘₯2, … , π‘₯𝑛 + π‘₯β€², π‘₯2, … , π‘₯𝑛

Is called a n- norm on X, and the pair (𝑋, . , … ,. ) is called a n-normed space over the field K. For example, we may take 𝑋 = ℝ𝑛 being equipped with the Euclidean n- norm

π‘₯1, π‘₯2, … , π‘₯𝑛 𝐸= the volume of the n-dimensional Parallelopiped spanned by the vectors π‘₯1, π‘₯2, … , π‘₯𝑛 which may be given explicitly by the formula

π‘₯1, π‘₯2, … , π‘₯𝑛 𝐸 = det⁑(π‘₯𝑖 𝑗)

Where π‘₯𝑖 = π‘₯𝑖1, π‘₯𝑖2, … , π‘₯𝑖𝑛 ∈ ℝ𝑛 for each 𝑖 = 1, 2, … , 𝑛.

Let (𝑋, π‘₯1, π‘₯2, … , π‘₯𝑛 ) be a n- normed space of dimension 𝑑 β‰₯ 𝑛 β‰₯ 2 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘Ž1, π‘Ž2, … , π‘Žπ‘› be linearly independent set in X. Then the following function . , … , . ∞ π‘œπ‘› 𝑋𝑛 βˆ’1 defined by

π‘₯1, π‘₯2, … , π‘₯𝑛 ∞ = π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ π‘₯1, π‘₯2, … , π‘₯𝑛 βˆ’1, π‘Žπ‘– : 𝑖 = 1,2, … , 𝑛 defines on (n-1)- norm on X with

respect to π‘Ž1, π‘Ž2, … , π‘Žπ‘› .

A sequence π‘₯π‘˜ in a n-normed space 𝑋, . , … , . is said to converge to some 𝐿 ∈ 𝑋 if

lim

π‘˜β†’βˆž π‘₯π‘˜ βˆ’ 𝐿, 𝑧1, … , π‘§π‘›βˆ’1 = 0, π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘’π‘£π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘¦ 𝑧1, … , π‘§π‘›βˆ’1∈ 𝑋.

A sequence π‘₯π‘˜ in a n-normed space 𝑋, . , … , . is said to be Cauchy if

limπ‘˜,π‘β†’βˆž π‘₯π‘˜ βˆ’ π‘₯𝑝, 𝑧1, … , 𝑧𝑛 βˆ’1 = 0, π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘’π‘£π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘¦ 𝑧1, … , 𝑧𝑛 βˆ’1 ∈ 𝑋.

(3)

The initial works on double sequence is found in Bromwich [6]. Later on, it was studied by Hardy [ 7 ], Moricz [ 8 ], Moricz and Rhoades[9], Tripathy ([10] [11]), BaΘ™arir and Sonalcan [12] and many others. Hardy [ 13 ] introduced the notion of regular convergence for double sequences. Quite recently, Zeltser[ 14 ] in her Ph.D thesis has essentially studied both the theory of topological double sequence spaces and the theory of summability of double sequences. Mursaleen and Edely [ 16 ] have recently studied the statistical convergence and Cauchy convergence for double sequences and given the relation between statistical convergent and strongly cesΔƒro summable double sequences, Mursaleen [9] and Mursaleen and Edely [15] have defined the almost strong regularity of matrices for double sequences and applied these matrices to establish a core theorem and introduce M-Core for double sequences and determined those four dimensional matrices transforming every bounded sequence π‘₯ = (π‘₯π‘šπ‘›) into one whose core is a subset of the M-Core of x. More recently, Altay and BaΘ™ar [17 ] have defined the spaces 𝐡𝑆, 𝐡𝑆 𝑑 , 𝐢𝑆𝑝, 𝐢𝑆𝑏𝑝, πΆπ‘†π‘Ÿ π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝐡𝑉 of double sequence consisting of all double series whose sequence of partial sums are in the space ℳ𝑒, ℳ𝑒 𝑑 , 𝐢𝑝, 𝐢𝑏𝑝, πΆπ‘Ÿ π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ ℒ𝑒 respectively and also examined some properties of those sequence spaces as well as the 𝛼 βˆ’duals of these spaces 𝐡𝑆, 𝐡𝑉, 𝐢𝑆𝑏𝑝 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑑𝑕𝑒 𝛽 𝑣 βˆ’ π‘‘π‘’π‘Žπ‘™π‘  of the spaces 𝐢𝑆𝑏𝑝 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ πΆπ‘†π‘Ÿ of double series. Now, recently BaΘ™ar and Sever [18] have introduced the Banach space β„’π‘ž of double sequences corresponding to the well known β„“π‘ž of single sequences and determined some properties of the β„’π‘ž. The class of

sequences which are strongly cesaro summble with respect to a modulus function was introduced by Maddox [19] as an extension of the definition of strongly cesΔƒro summable sequences. Cannor [20] further extended this notion to strongly A-summability with respect to a modulus where 𝐴 = π‘Žπ‘›π‘˜ is a non negative regular matrix, using the definition Cannor established connection between strong A-summability, strong A-summability with respect to a modulus and A-Statistical convergence. In 1900, Pringsheim [21] presented a definition for convergence of double sequences. Following Pringsheim work, Hamilton and Robinson [5] and [22], respectively presented a series of necessary and sufficient conditions on the entries of 𝐴 =

π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,𝑙 that ensure the presentation of Pringsheim type convergence on the following

(4)

Throughout this paper the four dimensional matrices and double sequences are of real valued entries unless otherwise specified. Let 𝑠′′ denotes the set of all double sequences of complex numbers. By the convergence of a double sequence we mean the convergence in Pringsheim sense i.e a double sequence π‘₯ = (π‘₯π‘˜π‘™) has Pringsheim limit L (denoted by P-limit x= L) provided that given πœ– > 0 π‘‘π‘•π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ 𝑒π‘₯𝑖𝑠𝑑𝑠 𝑛 ∈ β„•, 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑕 π‘‘π‘•π‘Žπ‘‘ π‘₯π‘˜π‘™ βˆ’ 𝐿 < πœ–, π‘€π‘•π‘’π‘›π‘’π‘£π‘’π‘Ÿ π‘˜, 𝑙 > 𝑛 (see[21]).

We shall write more briefly as P-convergent. The double sequence π‘₯ = π‘₯π‘˜π‘™ is bounded if there exists a positive number M such that π‘₯π‘˜π‘™ < 𝑀 for all k, l.

The notion of difference sequence spaces was introduced by Kizmaz [23], who studied the difference sequence spaces π‘™βˆž βˆ† , 𝑐 βˆ† and 𝑐0 βˆ† . This notion was further generalized by Et

and Γ§olak [24] defined the sequence spaces π‘™βˆž βˆ†π‘š , 𝑐 βˆ†π‘š and 𝑐

0 βˆ†π‘š . Let m, n a non negative

integers we have the following spaces:

𝑍 βˆ†π‘‘π‘£ = {π‘₯ = (π‘₯π‘˜) ∈ πœ”: (βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯π‘˜) ∈ 𝑍}

For 𝑍 = 𝑐, 𝑐0, π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘™βˆž where

βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯ = βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯π‘˜ = (βˆ†π‘‘π‘£βˆ’1π‘₯

π‘˜ βˆ’ βˆ†π‘‘π‘£βˆ’1π‘₯π‘˜+1), and βˆ†π‘‘0π‘₯π‘˜ = π‘₯π‘˜

For all π‘˜ ∈ 𝑁, which is equivalent to binomial representation

βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯

π‘˜ = (βˆ’1)𝑖

𝑣 𝑖 π‘₯+𝑑𝑖 𝑣

𝑖=0

It was proved that the generalized sequence space 𝑍(βˆ†π‘‘π‘£), where 𝑍 = β„“βˆž, 𝑐 or 𝑐0, is a Banach

space with norm defined by

π‘₯ βˆ†π‘‘π‘£ = 𝑣𝑖=1 π‘₯𝑖 + 𝑠𝑒𝑝 βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯π‘˜ .

Taking 𝑑 = 1, we get the spaces which were introduced and studied by Et and Γ§olak [24].

Taking 𝑑 = 𝑣 = 1, we get the spaces which were introduced and studied by Kizmaz [23].

(5)

1 𝑝 πœƒ = 0

2 𝑝 βˆ’π‘₯ = 𝑝(π‘₯)

3 𝑝 π‘₯ + 𝑦 ≀ 𝑝 π‘₯ + 𝑝(𝑦) and

4 Scalar multiplication is continuous, that is 𝛼𝑛 βˆ’ 𝛼 β†’ 0π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑝 π‘₯𝑛 βˆ’ π‘₯ β†’ 0, π‘–π‘šπ‘π‘™π‘¦ 𝑝 𝛼𝑛π‘₯𝑛 βˆ’

𝛼π‘₯β†’0, for all 𝛼 𝑖𝑛ℝ and x in X. where πœƒ is the zero vector in the space X.

A paranorm p for which 𝑝 π‘₯ = 0, π‘–π‘šπ‘π‘™π‘–π‘’π‘  π‘₯ = πœƒ is called total paranorm and the pair (X, p) is called a total paranormed space. It is well known that the metric of any linear metric space is given by some total paranorm (see [25])

A modulus function is a function β„³: 0,∞ β†’ [0,∞) such that

1 β„³ π‘₯ = 0 𝑖𝑓 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘œπ‘›π‘™π‘¦ 𝑖𝑓 π‘₯ = 0.

2 β„³ π‘₯ + 𝑦 ≀ℳ π‘₯ +β„³ 𝑦 , βˆ€ π‘₯ β‰₯ 0, 𝑦 β‰₯ 0.

3 β„³ is increasing

4 β„³ is continuous from right at 0.

It follows that β„³ must be continuous everywhere on 0,∞ . The modulus function may be bounded or unbounded. For example, if we take β„³ π‘₯ = π‘₯

π‘₯+1, then β„³(π‘₯) is bounded. If

β„³ π‘₯ = π‘₯𝑝, 0 < 𝑝 < 1, then the modulus β„³(π‘₯) is unbounded. Modulus function has been discussed in ([27], [28], [29]) and reference therein.

Let 𝐴 = (π‘Žπ‘š,𝑛,π‘˜,𝑙) denotes a four dimensional summability matrix that maps the complex double sequence x into the double sequence 𝐴π‘₯ where π‘šπ‘›π‘‘π‘• term of 𝐴π‘₯ is as follows:

𝐴π‘₯ π‘š ,𝑛 = βˆžπ‘˜,𝑙=0,0,∞ π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,𝑙π‘₯π‘˜π‘™.

Let β„³ = (π‘€π‘˜π‘™) be a sequence of modulus functions and 𝐴 = π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,𝑙 be a non negative four dimensional matrix of real entries with

sup

π‘š ,𝑛 π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,𝑙

∞,∞

π‘˜,𝑙=0,0

(6)

Let 𝑝 = (π‘π‘˜,𝑙) be bounded sequence of positive real numbers and 𝑒 = (π‘’π‘˜,𝑙) be any sequence of strictly positive real numbers

Sharma and Esi [26 ] have defined and studied the double sequence defined by a sequence of modulus functions over n- normed spaces and discussed the topological properties and inclusion relations between these spaces.

In this paper we define the following sequence spaces: Let 𝑠 β‰₯ 0

(i). πœ”0β€²β€² βˆ†π‘‘π‘£, 𝐴,β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , .

= π‘₯ ∈ 𝑠′′: lim

π‘š ,𝑛 π‘˜π‘™

βˆ’π‘ π‘’

π‘˜,𝑙 π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,π‘™π‘€π‘˜,𝑙

βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯π‘˜,𝑙

𝜌 , 𝑧1, … , π‘§π‘›βˆ’1

π‘π‘˜π‘™ ∞,∞

π‘˜,𝑙=1,1

= 0, 𝜌 > 0 .

(ii). πœ”β€²β€² βˆ†π‘‘π‘£, 𝐴,β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , .

= π‘₯ ∈ 𝑠′′: lim

π‘š ,𝑛 π‘˜π‘™

βˆ’π‘ π‘’

π‘˜,𝑙 π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,π‘™π‘€π‘˜,𝑙

βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯π‘˜,π‘™βˆ’ 𝐿

𝜌 , 𝑧1, … , π‘§π‘›βˆ’1

π‘π‘˜π‘™

∞,∞

π‘˜,𝑙=1,1

= 0, π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘ π‘œπ‘šπ‘’ 𝐿, 𝜌 > 0

(ii). πœ”βˆžβ€²β€² βˆ† 𝑑

𝑣, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , .

= π‘₯ ∈ 𝑠′′: sup π‘š ,𝑛

π‘˜π‘™ βˆ’π‘ π‘’

π‘˜,𝑙 π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,π‘™π‘€π‘˜,𝑙

βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯π‘˜,𝑙

𝜌 , 𝑧1, … , π‘§π‘›βˆ’1

π‘π‘˜π‘™

∞,∞

π‘˜,𝑙=1,1

< ∞, 𝜌 > 0

The following inequality will be used throughout the paper.

Let 𝑝 = (π‘π‘˜π‘™) be a sequence of positive real numbers with 0 ≀ π‘π‘˜π‘™ ≀ supπ‘˜π‘™π‘π‘˜π‘™ = 𝐻 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘˜ = max⁑(1, 2π»βˆ’1) Then

π‘Žπ‘˜π‘™ + π‘π‘˜π‘™ π‘π‘˜π‘™ ≀ 𝐾 π‘Ž

π‘˜π‘™ π‘π‘˜π‘™ + π‘π‘˜π‘™ π‘π‘˜π‘™ (1.1)

(7)

2. MAIN RESULTS

The following theorems will be proved in this section.

Theorem 2.1 Let β„³ = (π‘€π‘˜π‘™) be a sequence of modulus functions, 𝐴 = π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,𝑙 be a

non-negative matrix such that supπ‘š ,𝑛 ∞,βˆžπ‘˜,𝑙=0,0π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,𝑙 < ∞, 𝑝 = (π‘π‘˜,𝑙) be bounded sequence of positive real numbers and 𝑒 = (π‘’π‘˜,𝑙) be any sequence of strictly positive real numbers, 𝑠 β‰₯ 0,the

spaces πœ”0β€²β€² βˆ† 𝑑

𝑣, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , . , πœ”β€²β€² βˆ† 𝑑

𝑣, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , . and

πœ”βˆžβ€²β€² βˆ† 𝑑

𝑣, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , . are linear spaces over the field of complex numbers β„‚.

Proof. Let π‘₯ = π‘₯π‘˜π‘™ , 𝑦 = π‘¦π‘˜π‘™ βˆˆπœ”0β€²β€² βˆ†π‘‘π‘£, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , . and 𝛼, 𝛽 ∈ β„‚. Then there exist

positive real numbers 𝜌1 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝜌2 such that

𝑃 βˆ’ limπ‘š ,𝑛 π‘˜π‘™ βˆ’π‘ π‘’

π‘˜,𝑙 π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,π‘™π‘€π‘˜,𝑙 βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯π‘˜,𝑙

𝜌1 , 𝑧1, … , π‘§π‘›βˆ’1

π‘π‘˜π‘™

∞,∞

π‘˜,𝑙=1,1 = 0, 𝜌1 > 0 (2.1)

𝑃 βˆ’ limπ‘š ,𝑛 π‘˜π‘™ βˆ’π‘ π‘’

π‘˜,𝑙 π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,π‘™π‘€π‘˜,𝑙 βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘¦π‘˜,𝑙

𝜌2 , 𝑧1, … , π‘§π‘›βˆ’1

π‘π‘˜π‘™

∞,∞

π‘˜,𝑙=1,1 = 0, 𝜌2 > 0 (2.2)

Define 𝜌3 = π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ 2 𝛼 𝜌1,, 2 𝛽 𝜌2 . Since β„³ = (π‘€π‘˜π‘™) is increasing, continuous and so by using inequality (1.1), we have

𝑃 βˆ’ limπ‘š ,𝑛 π‘˜π‘™ βˆ’π‘ π‘’

π‘˜,𝑙 π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,π‘™π‘€π‘˜,𝑙

βˆ†π‘‘(𝛼𝑣 π‘₯π‘˜,𝑙+𝛽 π‘¦π‘˜π‘™)

𝜌3 , 𝑧1, … , π‘§π‘›βˆ’1

π‘π‘˜π‘™

∞,∞

π‘˜,𝑙=1,1

≀ 𝑃 βˆ’ limπ‘š ,𝑛 π‘˜π‘™ βˆ’π‘ π‘’

π‘˜,𝑙 π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,π‘™π‘€π‘˜,𝑙

π›Όβˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯π‘˜,𝑙+𝛽 βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘¦π‘˜π‘™

𝜌3 , 𝑧1, … , 𝑧𝑛 βˆ’1

π‘π‘˜π‘™

∞,∞

π‘˜,𝑙=1,1

≀ 𝐾𝑃 βˆ’ limπ‘š ,𝑛 π‘˜π‘™ βˆ’π‘ π‘’

π‘˜,𝑙 π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,π‘™π‘€π‘˜,𝑙 βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯π‘˜ ,𝑙

𝜌1 , 𝑧1, … , π‘§π‘›βˆ’1

π‘π‘˜π‘™

∞,∞

π‘˜,𝑙=1,1

+𝐾𝑃 βˆ’ limπ‘š ,𝑛 π‘˜π‘™ βˆ’π‘ π‘’

π‘˜,𝑙 π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,π‘™π‘€π‘˜,𝑙 βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯π‘˜,𝑙

𝜌2 , 𝑧1, … , π‘§π‘›βˆ’1

π‘π‘˜π‘™

∞,∞

π‘˜,𝑙=1,1

β†’ 0.

Thus 𝛼π‘₯ + 𝛽𝑦 ∈ πœ”0β€²β€² βˆ†π‘‘π‘£, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , . . This proves that the space is a linear space.

Similarly, we can prove that πœ”β€²β€² βˆ† 𝑑

𝑣, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , . and πœ”

βˆžβ€²β€² βˆ†π‘‘π‘£, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , .

(8)

Theorem 2.2 Let β„³ = (π‘€π‘˜π‘™) be a sequence of modulus functions, 𝐴 = π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,𝑙 be a

non-negative matrix such that supπ‘š ,𝑛 ∞,βˆžπ‘˜,𝑙=0,0π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,𝑙 < ∞, 𝑝 = (π‘π‘˜,𝑙) be bounded sequence of positive real numbers and 𝑒 = (π‘’π‘˜,𝑙) be any sequence of strictly positive real numbers, 𝑠 β‰₯ 0,the spaces πœ”0β€²β€² βˆ†π‘‘π‘£, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , . , πœ”β€²β€² βˆ†

𝑑

𝑣, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , . and

πœ”βˆžβ€²β€² βˆ†π‘‘π‘£, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , . are complete topological linear spaces.

Proof. Let (π‘₯π‘˜,π‘™π‘Ÿ ) be a Cauchy sequence in πœ”0β€²β€² βˆ†π‘‘π‘£, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , . . Then, we write

𝑔 π‘₯π‘Ÿ βˆ’ π‘₯𝑕 β†’ 0, π‘Žπ‘  π‘Ÿ, 𝑕 β†’ ∞, βˆ€π‘š, 𝑛 we have

𝑃 βˆ’ limπ‘š ,𝑛 π‘˜π‘™ βˆ’π‘ π‘’

π‘˜,𝑙 π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,π‘™π‘€π‘˜,𝑙

βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯π‘˜π‘™π‘Ÿ βˆ’βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯π‘˜π‘™π‘•

𝜌 , 𝑧1, … , π‘§π‘›βˆ’1 π‘π‘˜π‘™

∞,∞

π‘˜,𝑙=1,1 = 0 (2.3)

Thus for each fixed π‘˜ π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑙 π‘Žπ‘  π‘Ÿ, 𝑕 β†’ ∞, 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝐴 = (π‘Žπ‘š,𝑛,π‘˜,𝑙) is non-negative we are granted

that

π‘˜π‘™ βˆ’π‘ π‘’

π‘˜,𝑙 π‘€π‘˜,𝑙

βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯π‘˜π‘™π‘Ÿ βˆ’ βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯π‘˜π‘™π‘•

𝜌 , 𝑧1, … , 𝑧𝑛 βˆ’1

π‘π‘˜π‘™ β†’ 0

And by continuity of β„³ = (π‘€π‘˜π‘™) and (π‘₯π‘˜,π‘™π‘Ÿ ) is a Cauchy sequence in β„‚ for each fixed k and l. Since β„‚ is complete as 𝑕 β†’ ∞, we have π‘₯π‘˜π‘™π‘Ÿ β†’ π‘₯π‘˜π‘™ π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘’π‘Žπ‘π‘• π‘˜, 𝑙 . Now from equation (2.3), we

have for πœ– > 0, there exists a natural number N such that

π‘˜π‘™ βˆ’π‘ π‘’

π‘˜,𝑙 π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,π‘™π‘€π‘˜,𝑙

βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯π‘˜π‘™π‘Ÿ βˆ’βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯π‘˜π‘™π‘•

𝜌 , 𝑧1, … , π‘§π‘›βˆ’1 π‘π‘˜π‘™

∞,∞

π‘˜,𝑙=1,1,π‘Ÿ,𝑕>𝑁 < πœ– (2.4)

For all m,n, since for any fixed natural number M we have from equation (2.4)

π‘˜π‘™ βˆ’π‘ π‘’

π‘˜,𝑙 π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,π‘™π‘€π‘˜,𝑙

βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯π‘˜π‘™π‘Ÿ + βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯π‘˜π‘™π‘•

𝜌 , 𝑧1, … , π‘§π‘›βˆ’1

π‘π‘˜π‘™

∞,∞

π‘˜,𝑙≀𝑀,π‘Ÿ,𝑕>𝑁

< πœ–

πΉπ‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘Žπ‘™π‘™ π‘š, 𝑛 𝑏𝑦 𝑙𝑒𝑑𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑕 β†’ ∞ in the above expression we obtain

π‘˜π‘™ βˆ’π‘ π‘’

π‘˜,𝑙 π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,π‘™π‘€π‘˜,𝑙

βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯π‘˜π‘™π‘Ÿ + βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯π‘˜π‘™

𝜌 , 𝑧1, … , π‘§π‘›βˆ’1

π‘π‘˜π‘™

∞,∞

π‘˜,𝑙≀𝑀,π‘Ÿ>𝑁

< πœ–

(9)

π‘˜π‘™ βˆ’π‘ π‘’

π‘˜,𝑙 π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,π‘™π‘€π‘˜,𝑙

βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯π‘˜π‘™π‘Ÿ + βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯π‘˜π‘™π‘•

𝜌 , 𝑧1, … , π‘§π‘›βˆ’1

π‘π‘˜π‘™

∞,∞

π‘˜,𝑙=1,1

< πœ–

For all π‘š, 𝑛. 𝑇𝑕𝑒𝑠 𝑔 π‘₯π‘Ÿ βˆ’ π‘₯ β†’ 0π‘Žπ‘  π‘Ÿ β†’ ∞, this proves that πœ”

0β€²β€² βˆ†π‘‘π‘£, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , . is a

complete linear topological space.

Now we shall show that πœ”.β€²β€² βˆ†π‘‘π‘£, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , . is a complete linear topological space.

For this, since π‘₯π‘Ÿ is also a sequence in πœ”

.β€²β€² βˆ†π‘‘π‘£, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , . by definition of

πœ”.β€²β€² βˆ† 𝑑

𝑣, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , . for each r there exists πΏπ‘Ÿ with

π‘˜π‘™ βˆ’π‘ π‘’

π‘˜,𝑙 π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,π‘™π‘€π‘˜,𝑙

βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯π‘˜π‘™π‘Ÿ + βˆ†π‘‘π‘£πΏπ‘Ÿ

𝜌 , 𝑧1, … , π‘§π‘›βˆ’1

π‘π‘˜π‘™

∞,∞

π‘˜,𝑙=1,1

β†’ 0, π‘Žπ‘  π‘š, 𝑛 β†’ ∞

Whence, from the fact that

sup

π‘š ,𝑛

π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,𝑙

∞,∞

π‘˜,𝑙=0,0

< ∞

From the definition of Modulus function, we have π‘€π‘˜π‘™ βˆ†π‘‘π‘£πΏπ‘Ÿβˆ’βˆ†π‘‘π‘£πΏπ‘•

𝜌 β†’ 0, π‘Žπ‘  π‘Ÿ, 𝑕 β†’

∞ π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘ π‘œ πΏπ‘Ÿ π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘£π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘”π‘’π‘  π‘‘π‘œ 𝐿. Thus

π‘˜π‘™ βˆ’π‘ π‘’π‘˜,𝑙 π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,π‘™π‘€π‘˜,𝑙 βˆ†π‘‘

𝑣π‘₯ π‘˜,𝑙+ 𝐿

𝜌 , 𝑧1, … , π‘§π‘›βˆ’1

π‘π‘˜π‘™

∞,∞

π‘˜,𝑙=1,1

β†’ 0

π‘Žπ‘  π‘š, 𝑛 β†’ ∞, π‘₯ ∈ πœ”.β€²β€² βˆ†π‘‘π‘£, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , . and this complete the proof.

Theorem 2.3 Let β„³ = (π‘€π‘˜π‘™) be a sequence of modulus functions, 𝐴 = π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,𝑙 be a non-negative matrix such that supπ‘š ,𝑛 ∞,βˆžπ‘˜,𝑙=0,0π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,𝑙 < ∞, then

(i). πœ”.β€²β€² βˆ† 𝑑

𝑣, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , . βŠ‚ πœ”

βˆžβ€²β€² βˆ†π‘‘π‘£, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , .

(ii). πœ”0β€²β€² βˆ†π‘‘π‘£, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , . βŠ‚ πœ”

βˆžβ€²β€² βˆ†π‘‘π‘£, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , .

(10)

π‘˜π‘™ βˆ’π‘ π‘’

π‘˜,𝑙 π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,π‘™π‘€π‘˜,𝑙

βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯π‘˜,𝑙

𝜌 , 𝑧1, … , π‘§π‘›βˆ’1

π‘π‘˜π‘™

∞,∞

π‘˜,𝑙=1,1

= π‘˜π‘™ βˆ’π‘ π‘’π‘˜,𝑙 π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,π‘™π‘€π‘˜,𝑙 βˆ†π‘‘

𝑣π‘₯

π‘˜,π‘™βˆ’ 𝐿 + 𝐿

𝜌 , 𝑧1, … , π‘§π‘›βˆ’1

π‘π‘˜π‘™

∞,∞

π‘˜,𝑙=1,1

≀ π‘˜π‘™ βˆ’π‘ π‘’

π‘˜,𝑙 π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,π‘™π‘€π‘˜,𝑙

βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯π‘˜,π‘™βˆ’ 𝐿

𝜌 , 𝑧1, … , π‘§π‘›βˆ’1

π‘π‘˜π‘™

∞,∞

π‘˜,𝑙=1,1

+ π‘˜π‘™ βˆ’π‘ π‘’π‘˜,𝑙[π‘€π‘˜,𝑙 1

𝜌, 𝑧1, … , π‘§π‘›βˆ’1

π‘π‘˜π‘™

] π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,𝑙

∞,∞

π‘˜,𝑙=1,1

Let there exist an integer π‘šπ‘™, such that 1

𝜌, 𝑧1, … , π‘§π‘›βˆ’1 ≀ π‘šπ‘™. Thus, we have

π‘˜π‘™ βˆ’π‘ π‘’

π‘˜,𝑙 π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,π‘™π‘€π‘˜,𝑙 βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯π‘˜,𝑙

𝜌 , 𝑧1, … , π‘§π‘›βˆ’1 π‘π‘˜π‘™

∞,∞ π‘˜,𝑙=1,1

= π‘˜π‘™ βˆ’π‘ π‘’

π‘˜,𝑙 π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,π‘™π‘€π‘˜,𝑙

βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯π‘˜,π‘™βˆ’ 𝐿

𝜌 , 𝑧1, … , π‘§π‘›βˆ’1

π‘π‘˜π‘™

∞,∞

π‘˜,𝑙=1,1

+π‘šπ‘™π‘’π‘˜,π‘™π‘€π‘˜,𝑙(1) π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,𝑙

∞,∞

π‘˜,𝑙=1,1

Since supπ‘š ,𝑛 ∞,βˆžπ‘˜,𝑙=0,0π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,𝑙 < ∞, and π‘₯ ∈ πœ”.β€²β€² βˆ† 𝑑

𝑣, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , .

Thus, we have π‘₯ ∈ πœ”βˆžβ€²β€² βˆ†π‘‘π‘£, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , . .This complete the proof.

(ii). It is easy to prove in view of (i) so we omit the details.

Theorem 2.4 Let β„³ = (π‘€π‘˜π‘™) be a sequence of modulus functions, 𝐴 = π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,𝑙 be a non-negative matrix such that supπ‘š ,𝑛 ∞,βˆžπ‘˜,𝑙=0,0π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,𝑙 < ∞ and 𝛽 = limπ‘‘β†’βˆž π‘€π‘˜π‘™(𝑑)

𝑑 > 0, then

πœ”.β€²β€² βˆ†π‘‘π‘£, 𝐴, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , . = πœ”.β€²β€² βˆ†π‘‘π‘£, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , .

(11)

It is sufficient to show that πœ”.β€²β€² βˆ†

𝑑

𝑣, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , . βŠ‚ πœ”

.β€²β€² βˆ†π‘‘π‘£, 𝐴, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , .

Now, let 𝛽 > 0. By definition of 𝛽, we have π‘€π‘˜π‘™ 𝑑 β‰₯ 𝛽 𝑑 , βˆ€ 𝑑 β‰₯ 0. since 𝛽 > 0, we have

𝑑 β‰€π‘€π‘˜π‘™(𝑑)

𝛽 , βˆ€π‘‘ β‰₯ 0.

Let π‘₯ ∈ πœ”.β€²β€² βˆ† 𝑑

𝑣, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , . . Thus we have

π‘˜π‘™ βˆ’π‘ π‘’π‘˜,𝑙 π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,π‘™π‘€π‘˜,𝑙

βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯π‘˜,π‘™βˆ’ 𝐿

𝜌 , 𝑧1, … , π‘§π‘›βˆ’1

π‘π‘˜π‘™

∞,∞

π‘˜,𝑙=1,1

≀ 1

𝛽 π‘˜π‘™

βˆ’π‘ π‘’

π‘˜,𝑙 π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,π‘™π‘€π‘˜,𝑙

βˆ†π‘‘π‘£π‘₯π‘˜,𝑙

𝜌 , 𝑧1, … , π‘§π‘›βˆ’1

π‘π‘˜π‘™

∞,∞

π‘˜,𝑙=1,1

Which implies that π‘₯ ∈ πœ”.β€²β€² βˆ† 𝑑

𝑣, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , . . This complete the proof.

Theorem 2.5 If 𝐴 = (π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛,π‘˜,𝑙) has only positive entries and 𝐡 = (π‘π‘š,𝑛,π‘˜,𝑙) be a non-negative matrix such that π‘π‘š ,𝑛 ,π‘˜ ,𝑙

π‘Žπ‘š ,𝑛 ,π‘˜ ,𝑙 is bounded then

πœ”βˆžβ€²β€² βˆ†π‘‘π‘£, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , . βŠ‚ πœ”βˆžβ€²β€² βˆ†π‘‘π‘£, 𝐡, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , .

Proof. It is easy to prove so we omit the details.

3. CONCLUSION

We discovered that the generalized spaces πœ”0β€²β€² βˆ†π‘‘π‘£, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , . ,

πœ”β€²β€² βˆ†π‘‘π‘£, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , . and πœ”

βˆžβ€²β€² βˆ†π‘‘π‘£, 𝐴, β„³, 𝑒, 𝑝, 𝑠, . , … , . are not only linear over the

(12)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors thank the anonymous referees for their valuable suggestions which led to the improvement of the manuscript.

REFERENCES

[ 1 ] S. GΓ€hler, Linear 2-normietre Rume. (1965), 1-43.

[ 2 ] F. Moricz, Extension of the spaces 𝑐 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑐0 from single to double spaces. Acta Math. Hungarica 57 (1991), 129-136.

[ 3 ] H. Gunawan, The spaces of P-Summable sequences and its natural n-norm. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 64 (2001), 137-147.

[ 4 ] H. Gunawan and M. Mashadi, On n-normed spaces. Int. J. Math. Sci. 27 (2001), 631-639. [ 5 ] H. J. Hamilton, Transformation of multiple sequences. Duke Math. J. 2 (1936), 29-60. [ 6 ] T. J. Bromwich, An introduction to the theory of infinite series. Macmillan and Co., Ltd., New York, 1965.

[ 7 ] G. H. Hardy, Divergent series. Oxford at the clarendon press, 1949.

[ 8 ] F. Moricz and B. E. Rhoades, Almost convergence of double sequences and strong regularity of summability matrices, Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 104 (1988), 283-294.

[ 9 ] M. Mursaleen, Almost strongly regular matrices and core theorem for double sequences, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 293 (2), (2004), 523-531.

(13)

[ 12 ] M. BaΘ™arir and O. Sonalcan, On some double sequence spaces, J. Indian Acad. Math., 21 (1999 ), 193-200.

[13 ] G. H. Hardy, On the convergence of certain multiple series, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 19 (1917), 86-95.

[ 14 ] M. Zeltser, Investigation of double sequence spaces by soft and hard analytical methods, Diss. Math. Univ. Tartu, 25, Tartu Univ. Press, Univ. of Tartu, Faculty of Math. And Comp. Science. Tartu (2001).

[ 15 ] M. Mursaleen and O. H. H. Edely, Almost convergence and a core theorem for double sequences, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 293 (2), (2004), 532-540.

[ 16 ] M. Mursaleen and O. H. H. Edely, Statistical convergence of double sequences J. Math. Anal. Appl., 288 (1) (2003),223-231.

[ 17 ] B. Altay and F. BaΘ™ar, Some new spaces of double sequences, J. Math., Anal. Appl., 309 (2005), 70-90.

[ 18 ] F. BaΘ™ar and Y. Sever, The β„’π‘ž of double sequences, Math. J. Okayama Univ., 51 (2009),

149-157.

[19] I. J. Maddox, Sequence spaces defined by a modulus. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 100 (1986), 161-166.

[20] J. Cannor, On strong matrix summability with respect to a modulus and statistical convergence. Canad. Math. Bull. 30 (1989), 194-198.

[ 21 ] A. Pringsheim, Zur theory der zweifach unendlichen Zahlenfolgen, Math. Ann. 53 (1900), 289-321.

[22] G. M. Robinson, Divergent double sequences and series. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 28 (1926), 50-73.

[ 23 ] H. Kizmaz, On certain sequence spaces, Canad. Math. Bull., 24 (1981), 169-176.

(14)

[25] A. Wilansky, Summability through functional analysis. 85,North-Holland Math. Stud. 1984. [26] S. K. Sharma and A. Esi, Double sequence spaces defined by a sequence of modulus functions over n-normed spaces. Acta Univ. Palacki. Obmuc. Fac. Rer. Nat. Mathematica, 53, 1 (2014)117-134.

[27] Y. Altin, Properties of some sets of sequences defined by a modulus function. Acta. Math. Sci. ser. B Engl. Ed. 29 (2009), 427-434.

[28] Y. Altin and M. Et, Generalized difference sequence spaces defined by a modulus function in a locally convex space. Soochow J. Math. 31 (2005), 233-243.

[29] Y. Altin, M. Isik, and R. Colak A new sequence space defined by a modulus. Stud. Univ. Babes-Bolyai Math., 53 (2008), 3-13.

References

Related documents