• No results found

Global Poincaré inequalities for the composition of the sharp maximal operator and Green’s operator with Orlicz norms

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Global Poincaré inequalities for the composition of the sharp maximal operator and Green’s operator with Orlicz norms"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

R E S E A R C H

Open Access

Global Poincaré inequalities for the

composition of the sharp maximal operator

and Green’s operator with Orlicz norms

Bao Gejun

1

and Yi Ling

2*

*Correspondence: [email protected] 2Department of Mathematical

Science, Delaware State University, Dover, 19901, USA

Full list of author information is available at the end of the article

Abstract

In this paper, we establish the global Poincaré-type inequalities for the composition of the sharp maximal operator and Green’s operator with Orlicz norm.

Keywords: Poincaré-type inequalities; Orlicz norm; sharp maximal operator; Green’s operator

1 Introduction

TheLp-theory of solutions of the homogeneousA-harmonic equationdA(x,du) =  for

differential formsuhas been very well developed in recent years. ManyLp-norm

esti-mates and inequalities, including the Poincaré inequalities, for solution of the homoge-neousA-harmonic equation have been established; see [, ]. The Poincaré inequalities for differential forms is an important tool in analysis and related fields, including partial differential equations and potential theory. However, the study of the nonhomogeneous A-harmonic equationsdA(x,du) =B(x,du) has just begun [–]. In this paper, we focus

on a class of differential forms satisfying the well-known nonhomogeneousA-harmonic equationdA(x,du) =B(x,du).

Let us first introduce some necessary notation and terminology. will refer to a bounded, convex domain inRnunless otherwise stated andBis a ball inRn,n. We

useσBto denote the ball with the same center asBand withdiam(σB) =σdiam(B),σ> . We do not distinguish the balls from cubes in this paper. We use |E|to denote then -dimensional Lebesgue measure of the setE⊆Rn. We saywis a weight ifwL

loc(Rn) and

w>  a.e. For a functionu, we denote the average ofuoverBby

uB=

 |B|

B

u dx,

where|B|is the volume ofBand theμ-average ofuoverBby

uB,μ=

μ(B)

B

u dμ.

Let∧l=∧l(Rn) be the set of alll-forms inRn, letD(,∧l) be the space of all differ-entiall-forms on, and letLp(,l) be thel-formsu(x) =

IuI(x)dxI onsatisfying

(2)

|uI|pdx<∞ for all orderedl-tuples I, l= , , . . . ,n. We denote the exterior

deriva-tive byd:D(,∧l)D(,l+) forl= , , . . . ,n– , and define the Hodge star

opera-tor:∧k→ ∧nk as follows. Ifu=u

IdxI,i<i<· · ·<ik, is a differentialk-form, then

u= (–)(I)u

IdxJ, whereI= (i,i, . . . ,ik),J={, , . . . ,n}–I, and

(I) =k(k+)+kj=ij.

The Hodge codifferential operator

d:D,∧l+→D,∧l

is given byd= (–)nl+donD(,l+),l= , , . . . ,n– . We write

u s,=

|u|sdx /s

.

The well-known nonhomogeneousA-harmonic equation is

dA(x,du) =B(x,du), ()

whereA:× ∧l(Rn)→ ∧l(Rn) andB:× ∧l(Rn)→ ∧l–(Rn) satisfy the conditions:

A(x,ξ) ≤a|ξ|p–, A(x,ξξ≥ |ξ|p, B(x,ξ) ≤b|ξ|p– ()

for almost every x and allξ ∈ ∧l(Rn). Here,a,b>  are constants and  <p<

is a fixed exponent associated with (). If the operator B= , equation () becomes dA(x,du) = , which is called the (homogeneous)A-harmonic equation. A solution to ()

is an element of the Sobolev spaceWloc,p(,∧l–) such that

A(x,du+B(x,duϕ= 

for allϕWloc,p(,∧l–) with compact support. LetA:× ∧l(Rn)→ ∧l(Rn) be defined

byA(x,ξ) =ξ|ξ|p–withp> . ThenAsatisfies the required conditions anddA(x,du) = 

becomes thep-harmonic equation

ddu|du|p–=  ()

for differential forms. If uis a function (-form), equation () reduces to the usual p -harmonic equation div(∇u|∇u|p–) =  for functions. A remarkable progress has been

made recently in the study of different versions of the harmonic equations, see [] for more details.

LetC∞(,∧l) be the space of smoothl-forms onand

W,∧l=uLloc,∧l:uhas generalized gradient.

The harmonicl-fields are defined by

H,∧l=uW,∧l:du=du= ,uLpfor some  <p<∞.

The orthogonal complement ofHinLis defined by

(3)

Then Green’s operatorGis defined as

G:C,∧lH⊥∩C,∧l

by assigningG(u) to be the unique element ofH⊥∩C∞(,∧l) satisfying Poisson’s equation

G(u) =uH(u), whereHis the harmonic projection operator that mapsC∞(,∧l) onto

Hso thatH(u) is the harmonic part ofu. See [] for more properties of these operators. In harmonic analysis, a fundamental operator is the Hardy-Littlewood maximal opera-tor. The maximal function is a classical tool in harmonic analysis but recently it has been successfully used in studying Sobolev functions and partial differential equations. For any locallyLs-integrable formu(y), we define the Hardy-Littlewood maximal operatorM

sby

Ms(u) =Ms(u)(x) =sup r>

 |B(x,r)|

B(x,r)

u(y) sdy

s

, ()

whereB(x,r) is the ball of radiusr, centered atx, ≤s<∞. We writeM(u) =M(u) if

s= . Similarly, for a locallyLs-integrable formu(y), we define the sharp maximal operator

M#

s by

M#

s(u) =M

#

s(u)(x) =sup r>

 |B(x,r)|

B(x,r)

u(y) –uB(x,r)

s

dy

s

. ()

Some interesting results about these operators have been established, see [, ] and [] for more details.

The purpose of this paper is to estimate the global Poincaré-type inequalities for the composition of the sharp maximal operator and Green’s operator with Orlicz norm.

2 Definitions and lemmas

We now introduce the following definition and lemmas that will be used in this paper.

Definition  We say the weightw(x) satisfies theAr() condition,r> , writewAr()

ifw(x) >  a.e., and

sup

B

 |B|

B

w dx

 |B|

B

w

r–

dx r–

<∞ ()

for any ballB.

Definition  A proper subdomain⊂Rnis called aδ-John domain,δ> , if there exists a pointx∈ which can be joined with any other pointx by a continuous curve γso that

d(ξ,)≥δ|xξ|

(4)

Lemma [] Eachhas a modified Whitney cover of cubesV={Qi}such that

i

Qi=,

Qi∈V χ

QiN χ

and some N > ,and if QiQj=∅,then there exists a cube R(this cube need not be a

member ofV)in QiQj such that QiQjNR.Moreover,ifisδ-John,then there is

a distinguished cube Q∈V which can be connected with every cube QV by a chain of

cubes Q=Qj,Qj, . . . ,Qjk =Q fromV and such that QρQji,i= , , , . . . ,k,for some

ρ=ρ(n,δ).

3 Poincaré inequalities

In this section, we prove the global Poincaré inequalities for the composition of the sharp maximal operator and Green’s operator withLpnorm.

To get our result, we rewrite our Theorem  in [] as follows.

Lemma  Let u be a smooth differential form satisfying A-harmonic equation ()in a

bounded domain ,let G be Green’s operator,and let Ms be the sharp maximal

oper-ator defined in()with <sp,q<∞.Then there exists a constant C,independent of u,

such that

B

M

s

G(u)–MsG(u)B qdμ

/q

C(δ,)|B|+n–p+q

σB

|u|pdμ

/p

for all balls B withσB,and a constantσ> ,where the measureμis defined by dμ=

w(x)dx and w(x)∈Ar()with wδ> for some r> and a constantδ.

Theorem  Let uLt

loc(,∧l),l= , , . . . ,n,be a smooth differential form satisfying

A-harmonic equation(),let G be Green’s operator,and letMsbe the sharp maximal operator

defined in()with <s<t<∞.Then there exists a constant C(n,t,δ,N,),independent

of u,such that

M

s

G(u)–M

s

G(u)Q

t

/t

C(n,t,δ,N,)

|u|tdμ

/t

()

for any bounded and convexδ-John domain⊂Rn,where the fixed cube Q

⊂,the

constant N> appeared in Lemma,and the measureμis defined by dμ=w(x)dx and

w(x)∈Ar()with wδ> for some r> and a constantδ.

Proof First, we use Lemma  for the bounded and convexδ-John domain. There is a

modified Whitney cover of cubesV={Qi}forsuch that=

Qi, and

Qi∈Vχ

 Qi

for someN> . Moreover, there is a distinguished cubeQ∈V which can be

(5)

such thatQρQji,i= , , , . . . ,k, for someρ=ρ(n,δ). Then, by the elementary

inequal-ity (a+b)t≤t(|a|t+|b|t),t≥, we have

M

s

G(u)–MsG(u)Q

t

/t

Qi∈V

t Qi M s

G(u)–M

s

G(u)Q

i

t

+ t

Qi

M

s

G(u)Q

i

M

s

G(u)Q

t

/t

C(t)

Qi∈V

Qi

M

s

G(u)–MsG(u)Q

i

t

/t

+

Qi∈V

Qi

M

s

G(u)Q

i

M

s

G(u)Q

t

/t

. ()

The first sum in () can be estimated by using Lemma .

Qi∈V

Qi

M

s

G(u)–M

s

G(u)Q

i

t

C(n,t,δ,)

Qi∈V

ρiQi

|u|tdμ

C(n,t,δ,)

Qi∈V

|u|tdμ

C(n,t,N,δ,)

|u|tdμ, ()

where the measureμis defined by=w(x)dxandw(x)∈Ar() withwδ>  for some

r >  and a constantδ.

To estimate the second sum in (), we need to use the property ofδ-John domain. Fix a cubeQiVand letQ=Qj,Qj, . . . ,Qjk=Qibe the chain in Lemma . Then we have

M

s

G(u)Q

i

M

s

G(u)Q

 ≤ k– i= M s

G(u)Q

ji

M

s

G(u)Q

ji+

. ()

The chain{Qji}also has the property that for eachi,i= , , . . . ,k– ,QjiQji+=∅. Thus,

there exists a cubeDisuch thatDiQjiQji+andQjiQji+⊂NDi,N> . So,

max{|Qji|,|Qji+|}

|QjiQji+|

≤max{|Qji|,|Qji+|}

|Di| ≤

N. ()

Note that

μ(Q) =

Q

=

Q

w(x)dx

Q

(6)

By (), () and Lemma , we have

M

s

G(u)Q

ji

M

s

G(u)Q

ji+

t

= 

μ(QjiQji+)

QjiQji+

M

s

G(u)Q

ji

M

s

G(u)Q

ji+

t

≤ 

δ|QjiQji+|

QjiQji+

M

s

G(u)Q

ji

M

s

G(u)Q

ji+

t

N

δmax{|Qji|,|Qji+|}

QjiQji+

M

s

G(u)Q

ji

M

s

G(u)Q

ji+

t

C(n,t,δ,N,)

i+

k=i

 |Qjk|

Qjk

M

s

G(u)–M

s

G(u)Q

jk

t

C(n,t,δ,N,)

i+

k=i

|Qjk| +n

|Qjk|

σjkQjk |

u|tdμ

=C(n,t,δ,N,)

i+

k=i

|Qjk|  n

σjkQjk|

u|tdμ

C(n,t,δ,N,)

i+

k=i

||n

|u|tdμ

C(n,t,δ,N,)

Qi∈V

|u|tdμ

C(n,t,δ,N,)

|u|tdμ. ()

Then, by (), () and the elementary inequality|Mi=ti|sMs–

M

i=|ti|s, we finally

ob-tain

Qi∈V

Qi

M

s

G(u)Q

i

M

s

G(u)Q

t

C(n,t,δ,N,)

Qi∈V

Qi

|u|tdμ

=C(n,t,δ,N,)

Qi∈V

Qi

|u|tdμ

C(n,t,δ,N,)

|u|tdμ

=C(n,t,δ,N,)μ()

|u|tdμ

=C(n,t,δ,N,)

|u|tdμ. ()

(7)

4 Poincaré inequality with Orlicz norm

In this section, we give a global Poincaré inequality with Orlicz norm for the composition of the sharp maximal operator and Green’s operator.

Definition  Letϕbe a continuously increasing convex function on [,∞) withϕ() = , and letbe a domain withμ() <∞. Ifuis a measurable function in, then we define the Orlicz norm ofuby

u L(ϕ,,μ)=inf

k>  : 

μ()

ϕ

| u(x)|

k

≤

. ()

A continuously increasing functionψ: [,∞)→[,∞) withϕ() =  is called an Orlicz function. A convex Orlicz functionϕis often called a Young function.

In [], Buckley and Koskela gave the following class of functions.

Definition  We say a Young functionϕlies in the classG(p,q,C), ≤p<q<∞,C≥, if (i) /Cϕ(t/p)/g(t)Cand (ii) /Cϕ(t/q)/h(t)Cfor allt> , wheregis a convex

increasing function andhis a concave increasing function on [,∞).

From [] and [], we know that the classG(p,q,C) contains some very interesting func-tions, such asϕ(t) =tpandϕ(t) =tplogα

+(t),p≥,α∈R, and each ofϕ,gandhis doubling

in the sense that its values attand tare uniformly comparable for allt> , and the con-sequent fact that

Ctqh–

ϕ(t)≤Ctq, Ctpg–

ϕ(t)≤Ctp, ()

whereCandCare constants.

Now, we are ready to give our another global Poincaré inequality with Orlicz norm.

Theorem  Letϕbe a Young function in the class G(p,q,C), ≤p<q<∞,C≥,let u

Ltloc(,∧l),l= , , . . . ,n,be a smooth differential form satisfying A-harmonic equation()

in,let G be Green’s operator,and letMsbe the sharp maximal operator defined in()

with <st<∞.Then there exists a constant C,independent of u,such that

M

s

G(u)–MsG(u)Q

L(ϕ,,μ)≤C u L(ϕ,,μ)

for any bounded and convexδ-John domain⊂Rnwithμ() <,where the fixed cube

Q⊂appeared in Lemma,and the measureμis defined by dμ=w(x)dx and w(x)∈

Ar()with wδ> for some r> and a constantδ.

Proof Letg,hbe the functions in theG(p,q,C) condition. Note thatϕis an increasing

function. Using Theorem , (i) in Definition , and Jensen’s inequality, we obtain

ϕ

k

M

s

G(u)–MsG(u)Q

t

/t

ϕ

kC

|u|tdμ

(8)

=ϕ

ktC

t

|u|tdμ

/t

Cg

ktC

t

|u|tdμ

=Cg

ktC

t

|u|tdμ

C

g

ktC

t

|u|t

. ()

Again, from (i) in Definition , we have

g(x)≤Cϕ

xt.

Thus, we obtain

g

ktC

t

|u|t

C

ϕ

kC|u|

. ()

Combining () and () yields

ϕk M s

G(u)–M

s

G(u)Q

t

/t

C

ϕ

kC|u|

=C

ϕ

kC|u|

. ()

Now, using Jensen’s inequality forh–, () and (ii) in Definition , and noticing thatϕis doubling, we see

ϕ

|M

s(G(u)) –Ms(G(u))Q|

k =h h– ϕ |M

s(G(u)) –Ms(G(u))Q|

k h h– ϕ |M

s(G(u)) –Ms(G(u))Q|

k h C |M

s(G(u)) –M

s(G(u))Q|

k

t

Cϕ

C

|M

s(G(u)) –Ms(G(u))Q|

k

t

t

=Cϕ

k C M s

G(u)–M

s

G(u)Q

t

t

Cϕ

k M s

G(u)–MsG(u)Q

(9)

Substituting () into () and using the fact thatϕis doubling, we get

ϕ

|M

s(G(u)) –Ms(G(u))Q|

k

()

C

ϕ

kC|u|

C

ϕ

k|u|

. ()

Therefore, from Definition , we have

M

s

G(u)–MsG(u)Q

L(ϕ,,μ)≤Cu L(ϕ,,μ).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

All authors completed the paper together. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Author details

1Department of Mathematics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150001, P.R. China.2Department of Mathematical

Science, Delaware State University, Dover, 19901, USA.

Acknowledgements

The first author was supported by NSF of P.R. China (No. 11071048).

Received: 23 April 2013 Accepted: 8 October 2013 Published:11 Nov 2013

References

1. Agarwal, RP, Ding, S, Nolder, CA: Inequalities for Differential Forms. Springer, Berlin (2009)

2. Agarwal, RP, Ding, S: Global Caccioppoli-type and Poincaré inequalities with Orlicz norms. J. Inequal. Appl.2010, Article ID 727954 (2010)

3. Ling, Y, Umoh, HM: Global estimates for singular integrals of the composition of the maximal operator and the Green’s operator. J. Inequal. Appl.2010, Article ID 723234 (2010)

4. Ling, Y, Gejun, B: Some local Poincaré inequalities for the composition of the sharp maximal operator and the Green’s operator. Comput. Math. Appl.63, 720-727 (2012)

5. Warner, FW: Foundations of Differentiable Manifolds and Lie Groups. Springer, New York (1983)

6. Ding, S: Norm estimate for the maximal operator and Green’s operator. Dyn. Contin. Discrete Impuls. Syst., Ser. A Math. Anal.16, 72-78 (2009). Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems, suppl. S1

7. Nolder, CA: Hardy-Littlewood theorems forA-harmonic tensors. Ill. J. Math.43, 613-631 (1999) 8. Buckley, SM, Koskela, P: Orlicz-Hardy inequalities. Ill. J. Math.48, 787-802 (2004)

9. Ding, S:L(ϕ,μ)-averaging domains and Poincaré inequalities with Orlicz norm. Nonlinear Anal.73, 256-265 (2010)

10.1186/1029-242X-2013-526

References

Related documents