• No results found

Neurophysiologic effects of spinal manipulation in patients with chronic low back pain

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Neurophysiologic effects of spinal manipulation in patients with chronic low back pain"

Copied!
10
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

Loading

Figure

Figure 1 The experimental setup for performing transcranialmagnetic stimulation (TMS; left) to evoke motor evokedpotentials (MEP; right) from the lumbar erector spinae muscles.SA=Stimulus artifact.
Figure 3 Schematic illustration of the high-velocity low-amplitude spinal manipulation technique.
Figure 4 Spinal manipulation did not alter the amplitude ofthe motor evoked potential (left) or short-latency stretch reflex(right) recorded from the erector spinae muscles in patientswith chronic low back pain (LBP) or in asymptomatic controls.
Figure 6 A commonly proposed neural pathway suggested toform the basis of a pain-spasm-pain cycle

References

Related documents

tasked the DOJ, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), to “reduce domestic terrorist threats, and investigate and prosecute actual or attempted terrorist attacks

Keputusan regresi juga meunjukkan bahawa sikap dan kawalan tingkah laku dilihat adalah prediktor yang paling signifikan bagi intensi perkongsian pengetahuan;

The objectives of this study were to investigate the occurrence of carbapenem-resistant GNB isolated from hospitalized and external patients in Algeria and to screen

Notably, SOD1-G93A/PGC-1 a double transgenic animals showed a similar level of complex I (Figure 4A, B) and complex IV activities (Figure 4C, D) as wild-type animals, suggesting

The research involved the co-design and implementation of an embedded learning intervention – a serious board game – to educate junior doctors (interns and SHOs) about patient

Group 2 included blood samples from 107 women who had a previous neural tube defect birth but whose current pregnancy was not affected and 414 control subjects.. Group 3 samples

The results of Theorem 2 together with the matching lower bounds of Theorem 3 provide complete classification of minimax rates of convergence in the problem of density estimation on

The 95% CIs for the sensi- tivity, specificity, and ␬ coefficient of parental report overlapped for all children; for children who were or were not at high risk (6 –23 months of age