• No results found

Group 1 Chabot Elementary School Hillcrest Elementary School Kaiser Elementary School Thornhill Elementary School

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Group 1 Chabot Elementary School Hillcrest Elementary School Kaiser Elementary School Thornhill Elementary School"

Copied!
24
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR

ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

(RFP NO. 13156)

Group 1

Chabot Elementary School

Hillcrest Elementary School

Kaiser Elementary School

Thornhill Elementary School

Group 2

Cleveland Elementary School

Crocker Highlands Elementary School

Lafayette Elementary School

Peralta Elementary School

Piedmont Avenue Elementary School

Group 3

Fruitvale Elementary School

Joaquin Miller Elementary School

Laurel Elementary School

Redwood Heights Elementary School

Sequoia Elementary School

Group 4

Brookfield Elementary School

Burckhalter Elementary School

Markham Elementary School

Melrose Leadership

(2)

  KITCHEN  PROJECT NAME:  Chabot Elementary School      SITE NUMBER:  106 (Region 1 / District 1)    EXISTING CONDITIONS:   

 Exis ng 304 s.f. kitchen does not meet the District 

Standard to be a “Finishing Kitchen”.  This kitchen 

is classified as a “Warming Kitchen”. 

 Some exis ng equipment that meets the “Finishing 

Kitchen” concept is re‐usable.  

 Shared ADA compliant staff restrooms are in close 

proximity to the exis ng kitchen.  There is no staff 

locker accommoda on. 

   

(3)

KITCHEN  PROJECT NAME:  Hillcrest Elementary School      SITE NUMBER:  127 (Region 1 / District 1)    EXISTING CONDITONS:   Exis ng 233 s.f. kitchen does not meet the Dis-trict Standard to be a “Finishing Kitchen”.  This  school is classified as a “No Kitchen” site.   Exis ng staff restroom is not ADA compliant.   

(4)

 

KITCHEN 

PROJECT NAME:  Henry Kaiser Elementary School     

SITE NUMBER:  171 (Region 1 / District 1)   

EXISTING CONDITIONS: 

 This school has no kitchen space and has food  service equipment located in the Mul ‐Use  Room.  This school therefore is classified as a  “No Kitchen” site. 

   

(5)

PROJECT NAME:  Thornhill Elementary School     

SITE NUMBER:  157 (Region 1 / District 4)   

EXISTING CONDITIONS: 

 Exis ng 1000 s.f. cooking kitchen does not meet  the District Standard to be a “Finishing Kitchen”.   This kitchen is classified as a “Warming Kitchen”.   Some exis ng equipment that meets the 

“Finishing Kitchen” concept is re‐usable.   Exis ng staff restroom is not ADA compliant.   

 

(6)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR

ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

(RFP NO. 13156)

Group 1

Chabot Elementary School

Hillcrest Elementary School

Kaiser Elementary School

Thornhill Elementary School

Group 2

Cleveland Elementary School

Crocker Highlands Elementary School

Lafayette Elementary School

Peralta Elementary School

Piedmont Avenue Elementary School

Group 3

Fruitvale Elementary School

Joaquin Miller Elementary School

Laurel Elementary School

Redwood Heights Elementary School

Sequoia Elementary School

Group 4

Brookfield Elementary School

Burckhalter Elementary School

Markham Elementary School

Melrose Leadership

Parker Elementary School

Reach Academy

(7)

KITCHEN  PROJECT NAME:  Cleveland Elementary School      SITE NUMBER:  108 (Region 1 / District 2)    EXISTING CONDITIONS: 

 Exis ng 324 s.f. kitchen does not meet the District 

Standard to be a “Finishing Kitchen”.  This kitchen is 

classified as a “Warming Kitchen”. 

 Some exis ng equipment that meets the “Finishing 

Kitchen” concept is re‐usable.  

 A shared ADA compliant staff restroom is in close 

proximity to the exis ng kitchen.  There is no staff 

locker accommoda on. 

  SGI_v3  06‐16‐2014 

(8)

  KITCHEN @ BASEMENT  PROJECT NAME:  Crocker Highlands Elementary  School    SITE NUMBER:  111 (Region 1 / District 2)    EXISTING CONDITIONS:   Exis ng 260 s.f. kitchen does not meet the  District Standard to be a “Finishing Kitchen”.   This kitchen is classified as a “Warming Kitchen”.   Some exis ng equipment that meets the  “Finishing Kitchen” concept is re‐usable.    A shared ADA compliant staff restroom is in close  proximity to the exis ng kitchen.  There is no  staff locker accommoda on.    SGI_v3  06‐16‐2014 

(9)

KITCHEN            PROJECT NAME:  Lafaye e Elementary School      SITE NUMBER:  129 (Region 1 / District 3)    EXISTING CONDITIONS:   Exis ng 447 s.f. kitchen does not meet the District  Standard to be a “Finishing Kitchen”.  This kitchen  is classified as a “Warming Kitchen”.   Some exis ng equipment that meets the  “Finishing Kitchen” concept is re‐usable.   Exis ng staff restroom is not ADA compliant.   There is no staff locker accommoda on.    SGI_v3  06‐16‐2014 

(10)

  KITCHEN  PROJECT NAME:  Peralta Elementary School      SITE NUMBER:  145 (Region 1 / District 1)    EXISTING CONDITIONS:   Exis ng 300 s.f. kitchen does not meet the  District Standard to be a “Finishing Kitchen”.   This kitchen is classified as a “Warming  Kitchen”.   Some exis ng equipment that meets the  “Finishing Kitchen” concept is re‐usable.   Some exis ng equipment may need to 

con nue to be located in Mul ‐Purpose 

Room.   There is no ADA compliant staff restroom  adjacent to the exis ng kitchen.  There is no  staff locker accommoda on.      SGI_v3  06‐16‐2014 

(11)

KITCHEN  PROJECT NAME:  Piedmont Avenue Elementary  School      SITE NUMBER:  146 (Region 1 / District 1)    EXISTING CONDITIONS:   Exis ng 229 s.f. kitchen does not meet the  District Standard to be a “Finishing Kitchen”.   This school is classified as a “No Kitchen” site.   Some exis ng equipment that meets the  “Finishing Kitchen” concept is re‐usable.   There is no ADA compliant staff restroom  adjacent to the exis ng kitchen.  There is no staff  locker accommoda on.     

(12)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR

ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

(RFP NO. 13156)

Group 1

Chabot Elementary School

Hillcrest Elementary School

Kaiser Elementary School

Thornhill Elementary School

Group 2

Cleveland Elementary School

Crocker Highlands Elementary School

Lafayette Elementary School

Peralta Elementary School

Piedmont Avenue Elementary School

Group 3

Fruitvale Elementary School

Joaquin Miller Elementary School

Laurel Elementary School

Redwood Heights Elementary School

Sequoia Elementary School

Group 4

Brookfield Elementary School

Burckhalter Elementary School

Markham Elementary School

Melrose Leadership

Parker Elementary School

Reach Academy

(13)

KITCHEN  PROJECT NAME:  Fruitvale Elementary School      SITE NUMBER:  117 (Region 2 / District 4)    EXISTING CONDITIONS:   Exis ng 600 s.f. kitchen does not meet the  District Standard to be a “Finishing Kitchen”.   This kitchen is classified as a “Warming Kitchen”.   Some exis ng equipment that meets the  “Finishing Kitchen” concept is re‐usable.   Exis ng staff restroom is not ADA compliant.    SGI_v3  06‐16‐2014 

(14)

 

KITCHEN 

PROJECT NAME:  Joaquin Miller Elementary School     

SITE NUMBER:  142 (Region 1 / District 4)   

EXISTING CONDITIONS: 

 Exis ng 800 s.f. cooking kitchen does not meet  the District Standard to be a “Finishing Kitchen”.   This kitchen is classified as a “Warming Kitchen”.   Some exis ng equipment that meets the 

“Finishing Kitchen” concept is re‐usable.   Exis ng staff restroom is not ADA compliant.            SGI_v3  06‐16‐2014 

(15)

KITCHEN 

PROJECT NAME:  Laurel Elementary School     

SITE NUMBER:  131 (Region 2 / District 4)   

EXISTING CONDITIONS: 

 This school has no kitchen space and has food  service equipment  in the Mul ‐Use Room.  This  school therefore is classified as a “No Kitchen”  site. 

 Some exis ng equipment that meets the  “Finishing Kitchen” concept is re‐usable.   

 

(16)

 

KITCHEN 

PROJECT NAME:  Redwood Heights Elementary  School   

 

SITE NUMBER:  148 (Region 2 / District 4)   

EXISTING CONDITIONS: 

 Exis ng 545 s.f. kitchen does not meet the  District Standard to be a “Finishing Kitchen”.   This school is classified as a “No Kitchen” site.   Some exis ng equipment that meets the 

“Finishing Kitchen” concept is re‐usable.   Exis ng staff restroom is not ADA compliant.   

There is no staff locker accommoda on.   

 

(17)

PROJECT NAME:  Sequoia Elementary School     

SITE NUMBER:  151 (Region 1 / District 4)   

EXISTING CONDITIONS: 

 Exis ng 693 s.f. cooking kitchen does not meet  the District Standard to be a “Finishing Kitchen”.   This kitchen is classified as a “Warming Kitchen”.   Some exis ng equipment that meets the 

“Finishing Kitchen” concept is re‐usable.   Exis ng staff restroom is not ADA compliant.    

 

(18)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR

ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

(RFP NO. 13156)

Group 1

Chabot Elementary School

Hillcrest Elementary School

Kaiser Elementary School

Thornhill Elementary School

Group 2

Cleveland Elementary School

Crocker Highlands Elementary School

Lafayette Elementary School

Peralta Elementary School

Piedmont Avenue Elementary School

Group 3

Fruitvale Elementary School

Joaquin Miller Elementary School

Laurel Elementary School

Redwood Heights Elementary School

Sequoia Elementary School

Group 4

Brookfield Elementary School

Burckhalter Elementary School

Markham Elementary School

Melrose Leadership

Parker Elementary School

Reach Academy

(19)

KITCHEN 

PROJECT NAME:  Brookfield Elementary School     

SITE NUMBER:  103 (Region 3 / District 7)   

EXISTING CONDITIONS:   

 Exis ng 722 s.f. cooking kitchen does not meet the  District Standard to be a “Finishing Kitchen”.  This  kitchen is classified as a “Warming Kitchen”.   Some exis ng equipment that meets the “Finishing 

Kitchen” concept is re‐usable. 

 Exis ng staff restroom is not ADA compliant.   

(20)

 

KITCHEN  PROJECT NAME:  Burckhalter Elementary School   

 

SITE NUMBER:  105 (Region 3 / District 6)   

EXISTING CONDITIONS: 

 This school has no kitchen space and has food service  equipment in the 1632 s.f. Cafeteria Portable.  This  school therefore is classified as a “No Kitchen” site.   Some exis ng equipment that meets the “Finishing 

Kitchen” concept is re‐usable.   

 

(21)

KITCHEN 

PROJECT NAME:  Markham Elementary School     

SITE NUMBER:  138 (Region 3 / District 6)   

EXISTING CONDITIONS: 

 Exis ng 249 s.f. kitchen does not meet the  District Standard to be a “Finishing Kitchen”.   This school is classified as a “No Kitchen” site.   Some exis ng equipment in the serving area that 

meets the “Finishing Kitchen” concept is re‐ usable. 

 There is no ADA compliant staff restroom 

adjacent to the exis ng kitchen.  There is no staff 

locker accommoda on. 

 

(22)

 

KITCHEN 

PROJECT NAME:  Melrose Leadership Academy  (139—Maxwell Park Elementary School)     

SITE NUMBER:  235 (Region 2 / District 4)   

EXISTING CONDITIONS: 

 Exis ng 203 s.f. kitchen does not meet the  District Standard to be a “Finishing Kitchen”.   This kitchen is classified as a “Warming Kitchen”.   Some exis ng equipment in the MP Room that 

meets the “Finishing Kitchen” concept is re‐ usable. 

 Some exis ng equipment may need to con nue  to be located in Mul ‐Purpose Room. 

 Exis ng staff restroom is not ADA compliant.   There is no staff locker accommoda on. 

  

(23)

 

KITCHEN  PROJECT NAME:  Parker Elementary School   

 

SITE NUMBER:  144 (Region 3 / District 6)   

EXISTING CONDITIONS: 

 Exis ng 525 s.f. kitchen does not meet the  District Standard to be a “Finishing Kitchen”.   This kitchen is classified as a “Warming Kitchen”.   Some exis ng equipment that meets the 

“Finishing Kitchen” concept is re‐usable.   Exis ng staff restroom is not ADA compliant.   

 

(24)

  KITCHEN  PROJECT NAME:  Reach (Cox Elementary School)      SITE NUMBER:  193 (Region 3 / District 7)    EXISTING CONDITIONS:   Exis ng 404 s.f. kitchen does not meet the  District Standard to be a “Finishing Kitchen”.   This kitchen is classified as a “Warming Kitchen”.   Some exis ng equipment that meets the  “Finishing Kitchen” concept is re‐usable.   Exis ng staff restroom is ADA compliant.        SGI_v3  06‐16‐2014 

References

Related documents

The present study has not only highlighted the pivotal role played by OHCW in the identification, diagnosis and management of oral manifestations of HIV/AIDS but has also

Hawthorne Elementary School Hebbville Elementary School Johnnycake Elementary School Lansdowne Elementary School Logan Elementary School Mars Estates

(Corporate Seal) Secretary. pcrior court of said county, to be A. RIGGS, Filed in odfice thLs the 151h day held on the fourth Monday in July, only 100 of whom, it is said, arc wo_

 Ford Dealers/Fleet Management Companies must report the vehicle sold to the proper end user FIN, LF018 using the applicable fleet delivery type (i.e. Delivery type "D"

The relationship between economic growth rates Data from Table 1 confirm that if the growth rate is and unemployment appears through the following linked with low

1 Finite State Machine Design Procedure 388 2 Application: A Simple Vending Machine 389. Alternative State Machine

Percutaneous transcatheter closure of the native aortic valve to treat de novo aortic insufficiency after implantation of a left ventricular assist device.. Santini F, Forni A,

These include the smooth transition from a curved oblique shock to ODW [10-12] and several more complex ODW formation of different wave configurations, for example, with the