International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering
Website: www.ijetae.com (ISSN 2250-2459, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal, Volume 7, Issue 10, October 2017)
395
Algebraic-Groups and Elucidation of Their Structure
Dr. Ramawatar Prasad
1, Sri Ram Nandan Yadav
2,
Dr. H.C. Jha3,Dr. Abhishek Kumar Singh
41,3Associate Prof. & Head, 2Research Scholar, 4PhD, M.Sc., (Gold-Medalist)
1,2University Department of Mathematics, K.S. College, L.Sarai, L.N.M.U, Darbhanga, Bihar (INDIA) 3
University Department of Mathematics, C.M. Science College, L.N.M.U, Darbhanga, Bihar (INDIA)
4
University Department of Mathematics, Magadh University, Bodhgaya -824234, Bihar (INDIA)
Abstract: Since Algebraic Groups are groups defined by Polynomials. As the group of Matrices of Determinant one is an algebraic group. Algebraic Groups play a vital role in most branches of Mathematics and also in Quantum Mechanics and in Lie Groups. Also Arithmetic Groups are groups of Matrices with integer entries and an important source of discrete groups acting on manifolds. Our aim is to provide a modern Exposition of theory of algebraic groups and also the Extension of Duality between Algebraic groups & their categories of representations.
Keywords: Algebraic Groups, Polynomials, Quantum Mechanics, Lie-Group, Discrete, Manifold, Duality, Categories.
I. INTRODUCTION
The classification of Algebraic Groups and their structures are the great achievements in Mathematics. Algebraic Groups are used in most branches of Mathematics and they hence also played an important role in Quantum Mechanics and their branches of physics usually as Lie-Group.
As per the definition of Algebraic Group, the co-ordinate Ring is allowed to have nilpotent elements. But in the years the Tannkien Duality between Algebraic Groups similar to that of Pontryagin Duality in the theory of locally compact abelian groups.
A connected Algebraic Group G is simple if it is not commutative and has no normal algebraic subgroups and also its centre Z is finite and G/Z is simple.
SLn is simple for n > 1 because its Centre
1
0
0
nZ
is finite and the quotient PSLn= SLn/Z is simple.
An Algebraic Group G is solvable if there is a sequence of Algebraic subgroups.
1
...
...
2 1
0
G
G
G
G
nG
such thateach
G
i1 is Normal and1
i
i
G
G
is commutative.Theorem 1.2 : Let
G
mbe the functor RR (multiplicative group). Eacha
R
has a unique inverse, and so
a
b
R
ab
Hom
k
X
Y
XY
R
R
G
m(
)
~
,
1
~
k alg[
,
]
/(
1
),
2
Therefore
G
mis an affine algebraic group, called themultiplicative group.
Proof: Let
k
(
X
)
be the field of fractions ofk
(
X
)
, and letk
[
X
,
X
1]
be the subring of polynomials inX
and1
X
. The homomorphism1 1
,
],
,
[
]
,
[
X
Y
k
X
X
X
X
Y
X
k
defines an isomorphism
k
[
X
,
Y
]
/(
XY
1
)
~
k
[
X
,
X
1]
, and so
G
m(
R
)
~
Hom
kalg(
k
[
X
,
X
1],
R
).
Thus
,
)
(
]
,
[
];
,
[
)
(
1
1
G
mk
X
X
for
f
k
X
X
and
a
G
mR
R
f
R(
a
)
f
(
a
,
a
1).
Theorem 1.3 : Let G be the functor such that G(R) = {1}
for all k-algebras R. Then
),
,
(
~
)
(
R
Hom
lgk
R
G
kaAnd so G is an affine algebraic group, called the trivial algebraicgroup.
Proof : More generally, for any finite group G, let
g G
g
k
G
O
(
)
(product of copies of k indexed by the elements of G). ThenR
Hom
kalg(
O
(
G
),
R
)
is anaffine algebraic group
(
G
)
kover k such that(
G
)
k(R)= GInternational Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering
Website: www.ijetae.com (ISSN 2250-2459, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal, Volume 7, Issue 10, October 2017)
396
Theorem 1.4 : For any k-vector space V, the functor of k-algebras3
Da(V) : R Homk-lin (V,R), (additive group)
is represented by the symmetric algebra Sym(V) of V :
),
,
(
~
)
),
(
(
lg
Sym
V
R
Hom
V
R
Hom
ka
klinR a k-algebra,
Therefore Da(V) is an affine group over k (and even an
affine algebraic group when V is finite dimensional).
Proof: Now assume that V is finite dimensional. Then
Hom
klin(
V
,
R
)
~
R
kV
,
and so
R
~
R
kV
(additive group) is an affinealgebraic group with coordinate ring Sym(
V
). Moreover,EndR-lin
(
R
kV
)
~
R
k Endk-lin),
(
~
)
(
V
R
kV
kV
and so the functor
R
~
EndR-lin(
R
kV
)
(additive group)is an algebraic group Va with coordinate ring Sym
)
(
V
kV
. The choice of a basis e1, ..., en for Vdefines isomorphisms EndR-lin
(
R
kV
)
~
M
n(
R
)
andSym
(
V
V
)
k
~
k
[
X
11,
X
12,...
...,
X
nn]
(polynomial algebra in the n2 symbol (Xij)1
i, j
n). Forf
[
,
,...
...,
]
12
11
X
X
nnX
k
and),
(
)
(
a
M
R
a
ij
n
f
R(
a
)
f
(
a
11,
a
12,
...,
a
nn).
Theorem 1.5 : For
n
n
matrices M and N with entries in a k-algebra R,det(MN) = det(M). det(N)
and
adj(M).M = det(M). I = M. adj(M) by (Cramer's rule),
where I denotes the identity matrix and
adj(M) = ((-1)i + j det Mji)
Mn(R)With Mij the matrix obtained from M by deleting the ith
row and jth column.
Proof: These formulas can be proved by the same argument as for R a field, or by applying the principle of permanence of identities. So, there is a functor SLn sending a k-algebra
R to the group of
n
n
matrices with entries in R and with determinant 1. HenceSLn(R)
,
,
)
1
)
(det(
]
...,
,
,
[
~
11 12lg
R
X
X
X
X
k
Hom
ij n n a kwhere det(Xij) is the polynomial, and so SLn is an affine
algebraic group with O(SLn)=
.
)
1
)
(det(
]
...,
,
,
[
11 12
ij n nX
X
X
X
k
It is called the special
linear group. For
f
O(SLn) anda
(
a
ij)
SLn(R),).
...,
,
(
)
(
11 nnR
a
f
a
a
f
Theorem 1.6 : Similar arguments show that the
n
n
matrices with entries in a k-algebra R and with determinant a unit in R form a group GLn(R), and that
R
~
GLn(R) is a functor. Moreover,GLn(R)
,
,
)
1
)
(det(
]
,
...,
,
,
[
~
11 12lg
R
Y
X
Y
X
X
X
k
Hom
ij n n a kand so GLn is an affine algebraic group with coordinate
ring4
,
.
)
1
)
(det(
]
,
...,
,
,
[
11 12
R
Y
X
Y
X
X
X
k
ij n nIt is called the
general linear group. For
f
O
(
GL
n)
anda
(
a
ij)
GLn(R),
).
)
det(
,
...,
,
(
)
(
ij
11 nn ij 1R
a
f
a
a
a
f
Proof: Again let A be the k-algebra in 2n2 symbols, X11,
X12, ..., Xn n, Y11, ..., Ynn modulo the ideal generated by
the n2 entries of the matrix (Xij) (Yij)-I. Then
Homk-alg(A, R) =
(
A
,
B
)
A
,
B
M
n(
R
),
AB
I
.
The map (A, B)
A projects this bijectively onto {A
Mn(R)/A is invertible} (because a right inverse of asquare matrix is unique if it exists, and is also a left
International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering
Website: www.ijetae.com (ISSN 2250-2459, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal, Volume 7, Issue 10, October 2017)
397
II. CONCEPT OF STRUCTURE OF SOLVABLE ALGEBRAICGROUPS
Let G be an abstract group and commutator of
G
y
x
,
is
1 1 1)
(
)
(
,
y
x
y
x
y
xy
yx
x
So,
[
x
,
y
]
1
if and only ifxy
yx
,
and G is commutative if and only if every commutator equals 1. Thederived group G1 of G is the subgroup generated by commutators.
Since every automorphism of G maps commutators to commutators, and So G' is a characteristic subgroup of G
(in particular, it is normal). In fact, it is the smallest normal subgroup such that G/G' is commutative.
Let us define a suitable mapping such as :
x
y
x
y
G
G
y
x
y
x
1,
1,...
..,
n,
n)
1,
1...
n,
n:
2n
(
has image the set of elements of G that can be written as a product of at most n commutators, and so DG is the union
of the images of these maps. The map
G
2n2
G
factors throughG
2n
G
.
1 1
1 1
1 1 1
1 1
1 1
1
,
,...
..,
,
)
(
,
,...
..,
,
,
1
,
1
)
,
...
,
(
x
y
x
ny
n
x
y
x
ny
n
x
y
x
ny
n Also a group G is saidto be solvable if the derived series
...
2
DG
D
G
G
terminates with 1. For example, if
n
5
,
thenS
n is not solvable because its derived seriesS
n
A
nterminates withA
n.
Now we are going to extend the idea of algebraicgroups.
Commutative groups are trangulizable :
At first we prove by linear algebra, then
Theorem 1.7 : If V be a finite -dimensional vector space over an algebraically closed field k, and let S be a set of commuting endomorphisms of V. There exists a basis of V
for which S is contained in the group of upper triangular matrices, i.e., a basis e1, ..., en such that
e
1,...
.
e
i
e
1,...
..
e
i
for all i.Let S be a set of commutating
n
n
matrices : then there exists an invertible matrix P such that PAP-1 is upper triangular for allA
S
.
Proof : We prove this by induction on the dimension of V.
If every
S
is a scalar multiple of the identity map, then there is nothing to prove. Otherwise, there exists anS
and an eigenvaluea
for
such that the eigenspaceV
a
V
.
Because every element of Scommutes with
,V
ais stable under the action of the elements of S : for
S
andx
V
a.
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
x
x
ax
a
x
The induction hypothesis applied to S acting on
V
a anda
V
V
/
shows that there exist basese
1,...
e
mforV
aand
e
m1,...,
e
n forV
/
V
a such that
e
1,...
.
e
i
e
1,...
..
e
i
for alli
m
e
m1,...
.
e
mi
e
m1,...
.
e
mi
for allm
n
i
Let
e
mi
e
mi
V
a withe
mi
V
.
Then e1, ...en is a basis for V .
Theorem-1.8 : Let V be a finite-dimensional vector space over an algebraically closed field k, and let G be a
commutative smooth algebraic subgroup of
GL
V.
Thereexists a basis of V for which G is contained in
T
n.
Proof : We have from above then , there exists a basis for
V such that the map
GL
(
V
)
GL
n(
k
)
defined as)
(
k
International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering
Website: www.ijetae.com (ISSN 2250-2459, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal, Volume 7, Issue 10, October 2017)
398
)
(
k
G
GL
(
V
)
)
(
k
T
nGL
n(
k
)
Now
G
T
n is an algebraic subgroup of G such that (G
T
n) (k) = G(k), and soG
T
n= G. So,.
n
T
G
Theorem-1.9 : Every commutative smooth algebraic group
G over an algebraically closed field is a direct product of two algebraic subgroups
u
s
G
G
G
~
–
such that
G
s(
k
)
G
(
k
)
sandG
u(
k
)
G
(
k
)
u.Proof : First note that the subgroups
D
nandU
n ofT
nhave trivial intersection, because
}
{
)
(
)
(
n nn
R
U
R
I
D
(insideT
n(
R
)
) for all R.Choose an embedding
G
T
n for some n, and letn
D
G
Gs
and .G
u
G
n Because G is commutative.G
G
G
s
u
is a homomorphism with kernel
G
s
G
u. Because}
1
{
n
n
U
D
as algebraic groups,G
s
G
u
{
1
}
, and so is injective; becauseG
s(
k
)
G
u(
k
)
G
(
k
)
and G is smooth, is subjective ; therefore it is an isomorphism.Theorem- 1.10: The quotient
G
DG
is commutative(hence DG is the smallest normal sub-group with this property).
Proof : Let N1 and N2 be normal subgroups of G. Then
N1(R) and N2(R) are normal subgroups of G(R) and
)
(
)
(
)
)(
(
N
1
N
2R
N
1R
N
2R
. Therefore)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
–
~
)
)(
(
)
(
R
N
1N
2R
G
R
N
1R
G
R
N
2R
G
on varying R and passing to the associated sheaves, we get an isomorphism
2 1
2
1
N
~
G
N
G
N
N
G
Therefore,
G
N
1
N
2 is commutative ifG
N
1and
G
N
2 are commutative. Similarly, for any finitefamily
(
N
i)
i
I
ofG
N
i is commutative if eachquotient
G
N
iis commutative, and it suffices to considerfinite families.
DG, it is analogous to the description of the derived group as the subgroup generated by commutators. As for abstract groups, there exist maps of functors
.
...
24 2
G
G
G
G
n
Let In be the kernel of the homomorphism
)
(
)
(
2nG
O
G
O
of k-algebras defined by.
2
G
G
n
Then
...
...
2
1
I
I
n
I
and we let
I
I
nTheorem -1.11 : The coordinate ring of DG is O(G)/I.
Proof : We have from the figure of set-valued functors
G
G
G
G
G
G
mult
n n
n
2 42
We get a diagram of k-algebras
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
2G
O
G
O
G
O
I
G
O
I
G
O
I
G
O
n n n
(because O(G)/In is the image of O(G) in O(G 4n
International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering
Website: www.ijetae.com (ISSN 2250-2459, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal, Volume 7, Issue 10, October 2017)
399
I
G
O
I
G
O
G
O
(
)
(
)
/
(
)
/
:
factors through
O
(
G
)
O
(
G
)
I
, and defines a Hopf algebra structure onO
(
G
)
I
, which corresponds to the smallest algebraic subgroup G' of G such that G'(R)contains all the commutators for all R. Clearly, this is also the smallest normal subgroup such that G/G' is commutative.
III. APPLICATION
The application of the main paper is in-depth study of modern Mathematics especially in modern Algebra which has the importance in Algebraic groups and Lie-Groups.
REFERENCES
[1] ARTIN, M. (1991). Algebra. Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
[2] BOREL, A. (1991). Linear algebraic groups. Springer-Verlag, New York.
[3] HARTSHORNE, R. (1977). Algebraic geometry. Springer-Verlage. New York.
[4] HUMPHREYS, J.E. (1975). Linear algebraic groups. Springer-Verlag, New York.
[5] CONRAD, B. (2002). A modern proof of Chevalley's theorem on algebraic groups. j. Ramanujan Math. Soc. 17: 1-18.
[6] KASSEL, C. (1995). Quantum groups, volume 155 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York.
[7] BOURBAKI, N. Lie. Groups et Algebres de Lie. Elements de mathematique. Hermann; Masson, Paris. Chap. I, Hermann 1960; Chap. II, III, Hermann 1972; Chap. IV, V, VI, Masson 1981; Chap. VII, VIII, Masson 1975; Chap.IX, Masson 1982 (English translation available from Springer).
[8] ERDMANN, K. and Wildon, M. J. 2006. Introduction of Lie algebras. Springer Undergraduate Mathematics Series. Springer-Verlag London Ltd., London.
[9] HUMPHYEYS, J.E. 1972. Introduction to Lie algebras and representation theory. Springer-Verlag, New York.
[10] IWAHORI, N. 1954. On some matrix operators. J. Math. Soc. Japan 6: 76-105.
[11] JACOBSON, N. 1962. Lie algebras. Interscience Tracts in Pure and Applied Mathematics, No. 10.. Interscience Publishers. New York London. Reprinted by Dover 1979.
[12] SAAVEDRA RIVANO, N. 1972. Categories Tannakiennes. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
[13] SERRE, J.P. 1965 : Lie algebras and Lie groups, volume 1964 of Lectures given at Harvard University, W.A. Benjamin, Inc., New York-Amsterdam.