Essential roles of a zebrafish prdm1/blimp1 homolog in embryo patterning and organogenesis

Full text




Vertebrate development entails a series of cell fate specification and morphogenetic events regulated by networks of evolutionarily conserved transcription factors and secreted molecules. In zebrafish, maternally deposited dorsal determinants are translocated by microtubule-dependent mechanisms to the future dorsal side of the embryo, leading to nuclear accumulation of β-catenin in the dorsalmost extra-embryonic yolk syncytial layer (YSL) and the overlying dorsal blastomeres. At the onset of zygotic transcription, β-catenin activates expression of bozozok (boz) and squint (sqt), encoding a transcriptional repressor and the Nodal-related 1 secreted ligand, respectively, both of which play independent and cooperative roles during formation of the gastrula organizer (Shimizu et al., 2000; Sirotkin et al., 2000). This signaling center, conserved in all vertebrate gastrulae, induces neuroectoderm, patterns the germ layers, and orchestrates gastrulation movements (Spemann and Mangold, 2001).

A wealth of data support the notion that the activity of the gastrula organizer is highly dynamic, but our understanding of the underlying genetic hierarchies remains incomplete (Spemann and Mangold, 2001) (reviewed by Hibi et al., 2002).

In zebrafish embryos, many organizer-specific genes, such as

goosecoid (gsc), are expressed in the dorsal blastomeres exclusively, whereas others, for example boz, are initially expressed in dorsal blastomeres, somewhat later in both dorsal blastomeres and the dorsal YSL, and finally exclusively in the dorsal YSL (Stachel et al., 1993; Yamanaka et al., 1998; Koos and Ho, 1998). The contribution of the dorsal YSL to the specification and function of the gastrula organizer remains puzzling. Transplantation studies demonstrate that the yolk cell, including the YSL, is capable of inducing organizer gene expression in host blastomeres in a non-cell-autonomous fashion (Mizuno et al., 1999). Furthermore, function of boz

only in the YSL is sufficient for normal development (Fekany et al., 1999). However, experimental degradation of RNA in the YSL does not prevent organizer formation (Chen and Kimelman, 2000). Therefore, the YSL and the dorsal blastoderm probably function in a redundant fashion to mediate Spemann-Mangold organizer formation and function.

The vertebrate gastrula organizer contributes to the elaboration of the embryonic pattern by secreting factors, including Chordin, Noggin and Cerberus, that antagonize the ventrally expressed TGF-β superfamily cytokines, the BMPs. The resulting BMP activity gradient is thought to specify a

During vertebrate development the dorsal gastrula or Spemann-Mangold organizer orchestrates axis formation largely by limiting the ventralizing and posteriorizing activity of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs). In mouse and Xenopus laevis, genes encoding the zinc finger transcriptional repressor Prdm1/Blimp1 (PR domain containing 1, with ZNF domain; previously named B lymphocyte-induced maturation protein 1) were recently shown to be expressed in the visceral endoderm and anterior endomesoderm, respectively, and the prechordal plate of gastrula stage embryos. Later in development

Prdm1/Blimp1is expressed in many other tissues, including pharyngeal arches, limb buds, otic vesicles, photoreceptor cell layer, slow muscle and cloaca. Based on misexpression and dominant-negative studies, Prdm1/Blimp1 was proposed to promote anterior endomesoderm and head development in Xenopus laevis. Here we report the isolation and functional characterization of zebrafish prdm1

exhibiting a dynamic and evolutionarily conserved expression pattern. Misexpression of prdm1 inhibits the

formation of dorsoanterior structures and reduces expression of chordin, which encodes a BMP antagonist. Conversely, interference with Prdm1 translation using antisense morpholino oligonucleotides, increases chordin

expression, while reducing expression of Bmp genes, and consequently dorsalizing the embryo. At the end of the gastrula period, prdm1 morphant embryos have enlarged animal-vegetal and anteroposterior embryonic axes. This altered embryo morphology is associated with augmented extension movements of dorsal tissues and normal posterior migration of ventral tissues. Additionally, Prdm1 activity is essential for proper development of slow muscle, the photoreceptor cell layer, branchial arches and pectoral fins. Our studies reveal essential roles for prdm1in limiting the function of the gastrula organizer and regulating cell fate specification and morphogenetic processes in precise correspondence with its intricate expression pattern.

Key words: Blimp1, Chordin, BMP, Gastrula organizer, Convergence and extension


Essential roles of a zebrafish prdm1/blimp1 homolog in embryo

patterning and organogenesis

Thomas P. Wilm and Lilianna Solnica-Krezel*

Vanderbilt University, Department of Biological Sciences, VU Station B 351634, Nashville, TN 37235-1634, USA

*Author for correspondence (e-mail:

Accepted 8 November 2004

Development 132, 393-404

Published by The Company of Biologists 2005 doi:10.1242/dev.01572

Research article



dorsoventral and anteroposterior progression of cell fates, with head and dorsal midline structures developing at the lowest levels of BMP activity, trunk structures at intermediate levels, and ventroposterior structures being specified by the highest BMP activity levels (reviewed by Hammerschmidt and Mullins, 2002; De Robertis et al., 2000). Therefore, understanding of the genetic hierarchy that regulates BMP activity during vertebrate gastrulation is of particular importance. In mouse embryos homozygous for mutations that inactivate both chordin and

noggin, axis formation proceeds rather normally, except that forebrain and notochord are missing (Bachiller et al., 2000), suggesting that yet additional factors operate to limit BMP activity in murine embryos. In zebrafish, bozand chordin(chd) act in partially overlapping pathways to limit BMP activity during head and trunk development (Gonzalez et al., 2000). Whereas chd mutant embryos exhibit mild ventralization and

boz embryos lack dorsal structures such as forebrain and notochord (Schulte-Merker et al., 1997; Fekany et al., 1999),

boz chd double-mutant embryos exhibit synergistic loss of head and trunk and have an enlarged tail, largely due to excess BMP activity (Gonzalez et al., 2000). Expression of chd is strongly reduced in young bozgastrulae but, at late gastrulation, returns almost to normal levels (Fekany-Lee et al., 2000). Additionally,

chd expression is only mildly affected in ndr1/sqt mutant embryos (Dougan et al., 2003). Thus, it is likely that several genes play redundant roles in regulating chdgene expression in zebrafish gastrulae.

The Krüppel-type zinc-finger gene Prdm1/Blimp1 (PR domain containing 1, with ZNF domain; B lymphocyte-induced maturation protein 1), a transcriptional repressor known to promote terminal differentiation of B lymphocytes and macrophages in the mouse embryo (Turner et al., 1994; Chang et al., 2000), is expressed in multiple tissues during early embryogenesis in Xenopus laevis, mouse and chick (de Souza et al., 1999; Chang et al., 2002; Ha and Riddle, 2003). Notably,

Prdm1/Blimp1 is expressed in the anterior endomesoderm in X.

laevis and the visceral endoderm in mice, tissues hypothesized to possess similar activities as the YSL of the zebrafish embryo supported by expression of orthologous genes such as

hematopoietically expressed homeobox (hhex) and LIM homeobox 1a(lhx1a) (reviewed by Sakaguchi et al., 2002). Due to early embryonic lethality of mice with inactivated Prdm1/Blimp1, functional studies have so far focused on its involvement in B lymphocyte development. Conditional targeting of prdm1 shows that mature B cells lacking Prdm1/Blimp1 activity cannot differentiate into immunoglobulin-secreting plasma cells (Turner et al., 1994; Shapiro-Shelef et al., 2003). In X. laevis, Prdm1/Blimp1 is hypothesized to induce anterior endomesoderm and promote head formation by positively regulating expression of cerberus

in cooperation with Chordin and Mix.1 (de Souza et al., 1999). Recently, zebrafish prdm1 was shown to be affected by a hypomorphic mutation known as u boottp39 (ubo) and to be required for slow muscle fiber differentiation (Roy et al., 2001; Baxendale et al., 2004). Whereas prdm1expression is dynamic, analyses of the loss-of-function phenotype have focused on a limited set of developmental events (Baxendale et al., 2004). Thus our understanding of zebrafish Prdm1 during embryogenesis remains incomplete.

Here we report that zebrafish prdm1 exhibits a dynamic expression pattern shared by the murine, chick and X. laevis

Prdm1/Blimp1 encoding genes. Misexpression of prdm1inhibits the formation of dorsoanterior structures and reduces expression of the BMP antagonist Chordin. Conversely, interference with Prdm1 translation using morpholino oligonucleotides (MOs) increases chordin expression and dorsalizes the embryo. Our studies propose a role for Prdm1 in limiting the function of the gastrula organizer and show that its activity is essential for many cell fate specification and morphogenetic processes in precise correspondence with the intricate expression pattern of this transcription factor.

Materials and methods

Zebrafish husbandry

Fish (Danio rerio) were maintained as described (Solnica-Krezel et al., 1994). Embryos were staged according to Kimmel et al. (Kimmel et al., 1995). The following mutant alleles were used: bozm168(Solnica-Krezel et al., 1996; Fekany et al., 1999), dintt250(Hammerschmidt et al., 1996; Schulte-Merker et al., 1997), oeptz57 (Gritsman et al., 1999), ogotm305

(Hammerschmidt et al., 1996), swrtc300a (Mullins et al., 1996;

Kishimoto et al., 1997), smub641 (Barresi et al., 2000), casta56

(Alexander et al., 1999b).


An expressed sequence tag (EST) with sequence similarity to reported Prdm1/Blimp1 proteins was used to isolate a zebrafish homolog by 3′/5′ SMART RACE (BD Biosciences) from a 6.5-hour postfertilization (hpf) cDNA preparation. Full-length prdm1 was obtained by proof-reading PCR (PfuUltra, Stratagene), cloned into the EcoRV site of the pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega) and used for antisense probe synthesis with SP6 RNA polymerase after ApaIlinearization. For misexpression, the full-length cDNA was cloned into the pCS2+ vector (Rupp et al., 1994) and used for capped RNA synthesis with SP6 RNA polymerase after NotI linearization (mMESSAGE mMACHINE, Ambion). The NCBI accession number is AY841759.

In situ hybridization

Single and double color whole-mount in situ hybridization was performed essentially as described (Thisse et al., 1993); BM Purple (Roche) was used as blue and Magenta phosphate (175µg/ml in DMF; Fluka) combined with Tetrazolium Red (350µg/ml in 70% DMF; Sigma) as red alkaline phosphatase substrates. The following molecular markers were used: gsc(Stachel et al., 1993), dlx3b (Akimenko et al., 1994), six3b(Kobayashi et al., 1998; Seo et al., 1998a), pax2a (Krauss et al., 1991), egr2b/krox20 (Oxtoby and Jowett, 1993), hgg1/ctslb

(Vogel and Gerster, 1997), boz(Koos and Ho, 1998; Yamanaka et al., 1998), chd(Schulte-Merker et al., 1997; Miller-Bertoglio et al., 1997),

szl/ogo(Martyn and Schulte-Merker, 2003; Yabe et al., 2003), bmp4

(Chin et al., 1997; Martínez-Barberá et al., 1997), ntl(Schulte-Merker et al., 1992), wnt8a(Kelly et al., 1995), mix(Kikuchi et al., 2000), sox17

(Alexander and Stainier, 1999), ptc1(Concordet et al., 1996), vox, vent

(Melby et al., 2000; Kawahara et al., 2000a; Kawahara et al., 2000b),

six7(Seo et al., 1998b), dkk1(Hashimoto et al., 2000), nog1(Fürthauer et al., 1999), hhex(Ho et al., 1999), ndr1 (Rebagliati et al., 1998), ndr2

(Erter et al., 1998), dlc(Smithers et al., 2000), gata1(Detrich et al., 1995), eve1 (Joly et al., 1993).

Microinjection and photoactivation of fluorescent lineage tracer

Embryos were microinjected at the 1-cell stage using 50, 100 or 200 pg doses of synthetic prdm1capped RNA (Marlow et al., 1998) or 1, 2 or 4 ng doses of a prdm1-specific morpholino oligonucleotide (MOprdm1,

5′-TGTGTGATCTCTCCCCTGAGTGTGT-3′; GeneTools, LLC) (Nasevicius and Ekker, 2000). A mutant form of prdm1 (prdm1mut)

predicted to be unable to bind MOprdm1was constructed by site-directed



mutagenesis (5′-AC(A/t)CACT(C/a)AGG(G/t)(G/t)AGAGATCA(C/t) ACA-3′) and used to evaluate the specificity of the MOprdm1-induced

phenotype. In co-injection experiments each reagent was microinjected independently at the 1-cell stage. Injection and photoactivation of anionic dextran DMNB caged fluorescein (Molecular Probes, D-3310) was performed as described (Sepich et al., 2000).


Embryos processed for whole-mount in situ hybridization were mounted in 80% glycerol/PBT and photographed using a Zeiss Axiophot compound microscope and an Axiocam digital camera. Live embryos were anesthetized if needed and mounted in 1.5% or 2.5% methylcellulose.


Cloning of Zebrafish prdm1

In order to investigate further the role of Prdm1/Blimp1 during early vertebrate development we searched the NCBI-database and identified a single zebrafish EST with sequence similarity to vertebrate Prdm1/Blimp1genes (de Souza et al., 1999; Turner et al., 1994; Ha and Riddle, 2003; Keller and Maniatis, 1991). The full-length cDNA sequence was obtained from a gastrula stage cDNA pool and designated prdm1. The transcript spans a total of 2522 bp and encodes a polypeptide of 776 amino acids (~87.7 kDa). Comparative sequence analysis revealed high similarity to human, mouse, chick and X. laevisPrdm1/Blimp1 proteins in the N-terminal SET domain predicted to harbor histone methyltransferase activity (Tschiersch et al., 1994), as well as in the C-terminal DNA-binding domain, which encompasses five Krüppel-type (C2H2) zinc-fingers (Fig. 1). The overall sequence

identity to vertebrate Prdm1/Blimp1 proteins is 55-56% (67-68% similarity), whereas within the zinc-finger motif sequence identity is 88-89% (91-94% similarity).

Expression profile of prdm1

Expression of prdm1was first detected by whole-mount in situ hybridization in the external YSL at the end of the blastula period (5.5 hpf; Fig. 2A). At the onset of gastrulation (6 hpf),

prdm1expression in the external YSL became more prominent, and shortly thereafter prdm1transcripts appeared at low levels in the anteriormost part of the prechordal mesoderm (Fig. 2B). By contrast, gscis expressed in the entire prechordal mesoderm and part of the chordamesoderm throughout gastrulation (Stachel et al., 1993) (Fig. 2F,G). The abundance of prdm1

transcripts in the prechordal mesoderm increased during gastrulation and expression extended more posteriorly compared with the hgg1 expression domain (Fig. 2C,D,H,I). At mid-gastrulation, prdm1transcripts were identified in the non-neural ventral ectoderm (not shown) and gradually confined to a line of cells marking the boundary between neural and non-neural ectoderm during late gastrula stages (Fig. 2C,D) following the dynamic pattern described for dlx3b(Fig. 2H,I). Furthermore, two stripes of slow muscle precursor cells adjacent to the notochord began to express prdm1 (Fig. 2D). Throughout segmentation, slow muscle expression of prdm1 decreased gradually from anterior to posterior somites but was maintained in the posterior and thus youngest somites (Fig. 2E,J,K). In addition, prdm1was expressed in a variety of tissue precursors, including the otic vesicle, the branchial arches and unidentified cells or cell groups in the central nervous system (Fig. 2E,J). At

24 hpf, prdm1transcripts were maintained in the developing ears, branchial arches and hatching gland, and newly detected in the pectoral fin buds, ectodermal cells of the fin folds and the cloaca (Fig. 2K).

Fig. 1.Sequence alignment of putative vertebrate Prdm1/Blimp1 proteins to zebrafish Prdm1 (D. rerio, in red). Identical sequences are boxed in dark gray, sequences with similar properties in light gray. The regions harboring a putative Groucho binding site (orange) (Ren et al., 1999), and five zinc-fingers (green) are highlighted.



A new prdm1expression domain in the photoreceptor layer of the retina was detected at 2 days postfertilization (dpf) and maintained until 3 dpf (Fig. 2L,M). Expression of prdm1in the cloaca, the pharyngeal pouches and the pectoral fins was maintained at least until 5 dpf, whereas prdm1expression in the ear disappeared by 3 dpf (Fig. 2L,M,N). Similarly, prdm1

transcripts disappeared gradually in the fin folds and were maintained only in the tip of the tail by 5 dpf (Fig. 2N). Starting at 3 dpf, prdm1 expression was detected in the developing neuromasts of the lateral line organ (Fig. 2N).

To place prdm1 in genetic hierarchies that regulate early development, we examined its expression in several pattern formation mutants. In bozm168embryos lacking dorsoanterior tissues such as forebrain, chorda and prechordal mesoderm (Solnica-Krezel et al., 1996; Fekany et al., 1999), the two lines of prdm1-expressing slow muscle precursor cells were either absent or fused, whereas the prechordal plate expression domain of prdm1 was missing (Fig. 3A,H,B,I). By contrast, injection of synthetic boz RNA induced ectopic prdm1

expression at early gastrulation (not shown). Therefore, both loss-of-function and gain-of-function data place mesendodermal prdm1 expression downstream of boz. Similarly, mesodermal and endodermal prdm1 expression depends on Nodal signaling, as the prechordal plate prdm1

expression domain was not detected in maternal-zygotic one-eyed pinheadtz57(MZoep) embryos lacking activity of the EGF-CFC co-factor essential for Nodal activity (Gritsman et al., 1999). By contrast, the ectodermal expression of prdm1was not affected in MZoep mutants (Fig. 3A,H,C,J). prdm1

expression is also dependent on BMP signaling. Embryos homozygous for a null mutation in the bmp2b locus swirltc300a

(swr) lack most ventral cell fates (Mullins et al., 1996). We observed that expression of prdm1in the non-neural ectoderm was reduced and confined to a small ventral region of swr

embryos (Fig. 3A,H,D,K). Conversely, dinott250(din) mutant gastrulae lacking activity of the negative BMP regulator Chordin displayed reduced dorsal structures with a concomitant expansion of the ventral prdm1expression domain (Fig. 3E,F) (Hammerschmidt et al., 1996).

slow muscle omittedb641(smu) mutant embryos, which lack activity of the Shh signal transducer Smoothened (Smo), fail to specify slow muscle (Barresi et al., 2000; Varga et al., 2001). This expression domain of prdm1was absent in smu mutant embryos (Fig. 3L,M), suggesting that Prdm1 functions downstream of Shh signaling in the slow muscle precursors. Cloaca expression of prdm1was missing in casanovata56(cas) mutant embryos carrying a mutation in the sox32 locus and lacking endodermal structures (Fig. 3G,N) (Alexander et al., 1999b; Kikuchi et al., 2001; Dickmeis et al., 2001), underscoring dynamic expression of Prdm1 in all germ layers.

Misexpression of prdm1 causes deficiency of dorsoanterior structures

In order to investigate the role of Prdm1 during embryogenesis, we microinjected synthetic prdm1 RNA at the one-cell stage and studied the effects on embryo morphology. Injection of high doses (400 pg) resulted in 100% embryonic lethality by 24 hpf, whereas most embryos injected with 100 or 200 pg Fig. 2.Expression of prdm1during embryogenesis. (A-C,F-H) Lateral view, dorsal to the right. (K-N) Lateral view, anterior to the left. (D,I) Animal view, dorsal to the bottom. (E,J) Flat mounts, anterior to the left. (C,D,H,I) Different views of same embryo. (D) Different focal plane in box. (A,B)

prdm1expression in YSL (arrows) and prechordal plate shortly before and after onset of gastrulation, compared with gscexpression (F,G). (C,D)

prdm1expression in prechordal plate, at the boundary of non-neural and neural ectoderm and slow muscle precursors (adaxial cells) at the end of gastrulation, compared with hgg1and dlx3bexpression (H,I). (E) New prdm1expression in branchial/gill arch progenitors and otic vesicle at 14 hpf. (J) prdm1expression in slow twitching myoblasts and unidentified neuronal cells; trunk and tail are shown. (K) New prdm1expression at 24 hpf in pectoral fin buds, dorsal and ventral fin folds and the cloaca; maintained expression in the hatching gland. (L,M) New prdm1expression in the photoreceptor cell layer at 2 dpf. (N) New prdm1expression in lateral line organ. Scale bar: 200µm. ac, adaxial cells; ba, branchial arch progenitors; cl, cloaca; fb, fin buds; ff, fin folds; ga, gill arches; hg, hatching gland; ll, lateral line organ; nc, neuronal cells; ne, neural ectoderm; nne, non-neural ectoderm; ov, otic vesicle; pf, pectoral fin; pl, photoreceptor cell layer; pp, prechordal plate; sm, slow twitching myoblasts.



doses completed embryogenesis. Starting at 4 hpf and throughout gastrulation (6-9.5 hpf), these embryos exhibited irregular epibolic movements that normally thin and spread the blastoderm around the yolk cell (not shown). However, the completion of epiboly appeared unaffected. We used 100 pg doses in all the gain-of-function experiments described below if not indicated otherwise.

At 1 dpf embryos misexpressing Prdm1 exhibited reduction (45%) or loss (42%) of forebrain, including eyes, anterior midbrain and notochord, while the remainder of the body axis appeared largely unaffected (n=286; Fig. 4A,B,C). A low number of these embryos appeared to be affected much more severely (9%; Fig. 4D) and 4% died by 24 hpf. In support, forebrain expression of six3b was reduced (52%) or missing (42%) and pax2a expression at the mid/hindbrain boundary was reduced (11%), whereas hindbrain expression of krox20

was not affected (n=189; Fig. 4E,F).

The defects observed after Prdm1 misexpression phenocopied bozm168mutants (Solnica-Krezel et al., 1996). To gain further insight into the molecular nature of these patterning defects, we analysed expression of the organizer genes bozand gscand of the dorsoventral patterning genes chd,

szland bmp4in prdm1RNA-injected embryos. Expression of

boz, normally detected from midblastula transition until early gastrulation in the dorsal aspect of the blastoderm and the YSL (Koos and Ho, 1998; Yamanaka et al., 1998), was missing in 39% of injected embryos at 4.5 hpf (n=167; Fig. 4G,H). Accordingly, expression of the early anterior axial mesoderm marker gsc, which depends on boz function (Fekany et al., 1999), was strongly reduced or completely absent at 5.5 hpf (45%; n=143; Fig. 4I,J). These observations indicated that the gastrula organizer was not properly specified in prdm1 -misexpressing embryos. In support of this notion, expression of chd, broadly distributed in dorsal mesoderm and ectoderm (Miller-Bertoglio et al., 1997), was reduced in 58% of early gastrulae (n=176; Fig. 4K,L). Moreover, ventral expression of

szlencoding another BMP antagonist positively regulated by BMP signaling (Martyn and Schulte-Merker, 2003; Yabe et al., 2003) and of bmp4 was expanded (69%, n=188 and 65%,

n=200, respectively; Fig. 4M-P). Furthermore, expression of

hgg1 in the anterior prechordal plate mesoderm was either

reduced and positioned more posteriorly (43%), or completely absent at 10.5 hpf (44%, n=238; Fig. 4Q,R). These effects are consistent with the head deficiencies observed at 24 hpf.

The similarity of dorsoanterior deficiencies observed in embryos misexpressing Prdm1 and boz mutants prompted us to test whether prdm1 RNA-injection could modify the boz

phenotype, which exhibits both variable penetrance and expressivity and decreases with the age of the female parent (Fekany et al., 1999). At sub-threshold doses (50 pg), prdm1

RNA injection affected AP neural patterning mildly in 5.9% of wild-type embryos (Fig. 4U), indicated by slightly reduced forebrain six3b expression and unaltered pax2a and krox20

expression. By contrast, Prdm1 misexpression at the same dose in boz embryos caused increased penetrance of forebrain defects (66, 67 and 85%, respectively) compared with untreated siblings (0, 0 and 12%, respectively; Fig. 4U) (Fekany et al., 1999). The expressivity of the bozphenotype was also increased, as revealed by further reduction of six3b

expression (Fig. 4S,T) (Fekany et al., 1999). Thus, given that

bozm168is a strong/null allele (Fekany et al., 1999; Koos and Ho, 1999), Prdm1 misexpression at a sub-threshold dose can impact organizer formation by regulating expression of other genes in addition and/or parallel to boz.

The severely affected embryos misexpressing Prdm1 (Fig. 4A,D) suggested that additional cell types were impaired. Expression of the pan-mesodermal marker ntlat the blastoderm margin was reduced in 73% of prdm1misexpressing embryos at late blastula stages (n=188; Fig. 5A,B). Similarly, expression of wnt8a, also involved in mesoderm development (Lekven et al., 2001; Erter et al., 2001), was reduced as well (92%, n=160; Fig. 5C,D). Likewise, expression of two endodermal markers,

mixandsox17, was reduced in prdm1misexpressing embryos at late blastula (21%, n=100; Fig. 5E,F) and early gastrula stages (91%, n=190; Fig. 5G,H), respectively. In conclusion, Prdm1 can also affect endodermal and mesodermal cell fate specification when ectopically expressed.

Prdm1 function is required to limit chordin expression in the gastrula organizer

To address the requirement for Prdm1 activity during development, we aimed to eliminate prdm1gene function by Fig. 3.Placing prdm1in genetic hierarchies. (A-D) Lateral view, dorsal to the right. (E,F) Dorsal view, anterior to the top. (H-K) Animal view, dorsal to the bottom. (L,M) Vegetal view, dorsal to the top. (G,N) Lateral view of trunk-tail junction, anterior to the left. (A,H;B,I;C,J;D,K) Different views of same embryo. (H,I) Different focal plane in box. (A,H,E,L,G) Normal prdm1expression at the conclusion of gastrulation, at early somitogenesis and at 24 hpf; compare Fig. 2 for details. prdm1expression in boz(B,I), MZoep(C,J), swr(D,K), din (F), smu(M) and cas

(N) mutants. For details see text. Scale bar: 200µm in A; 50µm in G.



using morpholino antisense oligonucleotides (MOprdm1) designed to interfere with translation of the targeted transcripts (Nasevicius and Ekker, 2000). Embryos injected with 1 ng of MOprdm1typically developed until 7 dpf (100%, n=376; see Fig. S1A,B in the supplementary material), while higher doses of 2 or 4 ng caused widespread necrosis in all germ layers and developmental arrest by 24 hpf (see Fig. S1A,C in the supplementary material). Therefore, in all loss-of-function experiments, MOprdm1 doses of 2 ng/embryo were used for phenotypic analysis during gastrulation and early segmentation and doses of 1 ng/embryo for analysis during late segmentation and beyond 24 hpf. We evaluated effectiveness and specificity of the MOprdm1-induced phenotype in a series of co-injection experiments using synthetic capped RNA of wild type and a mutated form of prdm1(Table 1A,B). First we assessed the effectiveness of MOprdm1by testing its ability to suppress the

prdm1 gain-of-function phenotype. Whereas most embryos injected with 100 pg of prdm1 mRNA exhibited irregular epibolic movements at late blastula stages and throughout gastrulation, this phenotype was suppressed when co-injected with 1 ng of MOprdm1 (Table 1A). No such suppression of ectopic Prdm1 activity was observed when synthetic prdm1mut mRNA, harboring mutations predicted to prevent binding of MOprdm1, was used instead (Table 1A). These experiments provide support for the effective and specific interference with

prdm1RNA activity.

The earliest morphological abnormalities of MOprdm1 -injected embryos were observed at the conclusion of

gastrulation (10 hpf), featuring an elongated animal-vegetal (AV) axis and mediolateral expansion in a dose-dependent fashion (Fig. 7N-S). At 2 ng doses all injected embryos (n=358) were affected, 93% of which strongly, whereas at 1 ng doses 85% (n=376) of injected embryos were affected less strongly, and the remainder appeared unaffected (data not shown). To investigate whether the defects observed in MOprdm1-injected embryos resulted from the reduction of Prdm1 function alone, we carried out rescue experiments using a sub-threshold dose of synthetic prdm1mut RNA (50 pg) causing mildly impaired epiboly in small numbers of injected embryos (Table 1B). When co-injected with 1 ng of MOprdm1, the number of injected embryos exhibiting animal-vegetal elongation at 10 hpf was significantly reduced to 31% (Table 1B). This result demonstrates suppression of the MOprdm1 phenotype by ectopic Prdm1 activity, supporting the notion that MOprdm1specifically impairs prdm1function.

To investigate whether the prdm1 morphant phenotype exhibiting an elongated AV axis is associated with dorsalization, as described for swrtc300aor somitabundtc24(sbn; lacking Smad5 activity) mutant embryos (Mullins et al., 1996), we studied expression of bmp4, szl andchd. Consistently, ventroposterior expression of bmp4 was reduced in 60% of prdm1 morphant embryos at 10 hpf, while the anterior expression domain in prechordal mesoderm was unchanged (n=180; Fig. 6A,B). Correspondingly, mediolateral expansion of chd expression (68%, n=163) and reduction of ventral szl expression (70%,

n=174) was observed at midgastrulation (6.5 hpf; Fig. 6C-F).

Fig. 4.prdm1misexpression phenotype. (A-D) Lateral view, anterior to the left. (E,F) Dorsal view, anterior to the top. (G,H,M,N,S,T) Lateral view, dorsal to the right. (I-L,O,P) Animal view, dorsal to the right. (Q,R) Animal view, dorsal to the bottom. (S,T) Dorsal view, animal to the top. (A,E,G,I,K,M,O,Q,S) Untreated controls (ctrl). (B-D,F,H,J,L,N,P,R,T) Embryos microinjected with synthetic prdm1RNA (Prdm1). (A-D) Overall morphology at 1 dpf. (E,F) six3b, pax2a, krox20expression in the developing brain at early somitogenesis; somitic dlcexpression for staging purposes. (G,H) boz; (I,J) gsc; (K,L) chd; (M,N) szl; and (O,P) bmp4expression. (Q,R)hgg1and dlx3bexpression at the start of somitogenesis. (S) six3b, pax2a, krox20expression in untreated and (T) prdm1-injected bozembryos with low phenotypic penetrance and expressivity. (U) prdm1-misexpression causes increased penetrance and expressivity of the bozphenotype monitored by reduction of six3b

expression; independent females (#1-3). For details see text. Scale bars: 200µm. d, dorsal; pp, prechordal plate. Animal pole highlighted by a star.



However, these alterations of expression domains of dorsoventral (DV) patterning genes were milder than those reported for bmp2b/swrand smad5/sbnmutants (Kishimoto et al., 1997; Nguyen et al., 1998; Hild et al., 1999; Kramer et al., 2002). Furthermore, in agreement with the endogenous expression profile of prdm1, BMP signaling was not altered before the onset of gastrulation (not shown).

As Prdm1 functions in slow muscle development downstream of Shh signaling (Fig. 3L,M) (Roy et al., 2001) and shh is expressed in the gastrula organizer and axial mesoderm throughout gastrulation (Krauss et al., 1993), we investigated whether the effects on DV patterning observed in

prdm1 morphant embryos might depend on Shh signaling. After injection of MOprdm1, most smu/smo mutant embryos, identified by missing ptc1 slow muscle expression, were elongated animal-vegetally and showed reduction of bmp4

expression compared with untreated siblings (n=44; Fig. 6G,H). Thus, Prdm1 function in DV patterning does not depend on Shh signaling. Furthermore, interfering with ectodermal Prdm1 activity resulted in increased chdexpression in 61% of MOprdm1-injected MZoepmutant embryos at the end

of gastrulation (10 hpf; n=174; Fig. 6I,J). Hence, Prdm1 can regulate chdexpression independently of Nodal signaling.

Further supporting the mild dorsalization phenotype, 85% of MOprdm1-injected embryos displayed a mediolaterally enlarged neuroectoderm (krox20) and somitic mesoderm (dlc) at the onset of somitogenesis (10.5 hpf), whereas position of the anterior prechordal mesoderm (hgg1) was unchanged (n=142; Fig. 6K-N). In addition, AP neural patterning (six3b, pax2a krox20) was not affected in prdm1morphant embryos (n=167; Fig. 6O,P). At mid-somitogenesis (16 hpf), expression of the ventral tissue markers gata1 in blood precursors and eve1 in ventroposterior cells in the tail were reduced in 94% (n=139) and 98% (n=135) of prdm1 morphant embryos, respectively (Fig. 6Q-T), suggesting a class C3 dorsalization phenotype according to Mullins et al. (Mullins et al., 1996). Nevertheless, at 24 hpf, judged by overall morphology, morphant embryos rather exhibited class 1 dorsalization characteristics (see Fig. S1A,B in the supplementary material).

The increase of chd and corresponding decrease of szl

expression in prdm1morphant embryos (Fig. 6A-F) prompted us to investigate whether interference with prdm1function can suppress the ventralized phenotypes of din/chd and ogontm305

(ogo; lacking Szl activity) mutant embryos. Whereas misexpression of Chd can fully suppress the ventralization phenotype of ogo/szlmutants (Miller-Bertoglio et al., 1999), misexpression of Szl does not rescue din/chd mutants, suggesting that Szl requires Chd function for its dorsalizing activity (Yabe et al., 2003). At 24 hpf, the ventral fin fold of the tail is characteristically duplicated and enlarged in both

ogo/szl and din/chd embryos (Fig. 7A,B,D). Interestingly, when injected with MOprdm1, we observed partial suppression of this phenotype in ogo/szl(92%, n=53) but not din/chd(0%,

n=69) embryos (Fig. 7A-E). Accordingly, bmp4 expression was reduced in 72% of ogo/szlembryos (n=36; Fig. 7F,G) but not in din/chd embryos (0%, n=80; Fig. 7H,I) injected with MOprdm1. Furthermore, the neuroectoderm was mediolaterally enlarged in ogo/szlbut not in din/chdembryos with impaired

prdm1function (Fig. 7J-M). However, other characteristics of the ventralized phenotypes were not affected. The observation that the dorsalization of prdm1 morphants is associated with increased chdexpression together with the above gain- and loss-of-function experiments suggest that Prdm1 activity promotes Fig. 5.Effects of prdm1misexpression on mesendoderm formation.

(A-F) Animal view, dorsal to the right. (G,H) Dorsal view, animal to the top. (A,C,E,G) Untreated controls (ctrl). (B,D,F,H) Embryos microinjected with 100 pg of synthetic prdm1mRNA (Prdm1). (A,B)

ntlexpression in mesoderm. (C,D) wnt8aexpression in mesoderm. (E,F)mixexpression in endoderm. (G,H) sox17expression in endoderm and dorsal forerunner cells. Scale bar: 200 µm (B). df, dorsal forerunner cells; en, endoderm.

Table 1. Evaluation of efficiency and specificity of morpholino-based Prdm1 knockdown

Dose of reagent injected Stage Frequency of defect (%)

Experiment prdm1 prdm1mut MOprdm1 (hpf) Phenotype observed Low High Wild type Dead n

A Efficiency of MOprdm1-binding to wild-type and mutated synthetic prdm1RNA

100 pg – – 4.5 Impaired epiboly 5 95 0 0 123

100 pg – 1 ng 4.5 Impaired epiboly 0 0 100 0 137

– 100 pg – 4.5 Impaired epiboly 7 93 0 0 134

– 100 pg 1 ng 4.5 Impaired epiboly 11 89 0 0 129

B Specificity of MOprdm1by restoring endogenous Prdm1 activity

– 50 pg – 4.5 Impaired epiboly 28 0 72 0 134*

– 50 pg – 10 Dorsalization 0 0 100 0 134*

– 50 pg 1 ng 4.5 Impaired epiboly 32 0 68 0 247†

– 50 pg 1 ng 10 Dorsalization 31 0 69 0 247†

– – 1 ng 4.5 Impaired epiboly 0 0 100 0 230‡

– – 1 ng 10 Dorsalization 93 0 7 0 230‡

Two different phenotypic degrees were scored, low and high, depending on the dose used. Gain-of-function phenotypes in red and loss-of-function phenotypes in blue.

*,†,‡Embryos from same experiments were scored for different traits independently.



BMP signaling during zebrafish gastrulation, probably through limiting expression of chdin the organizer region.

Given that boz negatively regulates bmp2b expression (Fekany-Lee et al., 2000; Koos and Ho, 1999; Leung et al., 2003) and ectopic Prdm1 activity can suppress boz expression (Fig. 4H), we tested whether dorsalization of prdm1 morphants is caused by excessive or prolonged expression of bozand/or its downstream targets. We found that the boz expression domain was not affected in prdm1 morphant embryos at late blastula stages, and was correctly downregulated at the onset of gastrulation (not shown). Similarly, expression of vox and vent,

negatively regulated by Boz (Kawahara et al., 2000a; Kawahara et al., 2000b; Melby et al., 2000; Imai et al., 2001), gsc, six3b

and six7(Kobayashi et al., 1998; Seo et al., 1998a,b), the Wnt8 antagonist dkk1 and the BMP antagonist nog1, confined to the presumptive anterior prechordal mesoderm (Hashimoto et al., 2000; Fürthauer et al., 1999), and hhex, expressed in the dorsal YSL (Ho et al., 1999), was normal in prdm1morphant embryos at early gastrula stages (not shown). Furthermore, mesodermal

ntl and wnt8a expression and endodermal mix and sox17

expression were unchanged in prdm1morphant embryos (not shown). Hence, although Prdm1 can suppress boz expression in misexpression experiments, its function does not appear to be essential for the regulation of bozand its downstream effectors. We conclude that Prdm1 appears to function in limiting chd

expression via boz- and sqt-independent mechanisms.

Knockdown of Prdm1 activity increases dorsal extension movements

Dorsalized mutant embryos exhibit an elongated AV and narrowed mediolateral (ML) axis, reflected by an increased AV/ML ratio (Myers et al., 2002) and an increase of the AP embryonic length at the conclusion of gastrulation (Sepich and Solnica-Krezel, 2004). Given that prdm1morphant embryos also showed altered morphology (Fig. 7N-Q), we carried out morphometric analyses by capturing micrographs of untreated and MOprdm1-injected sibling embryos at the end of gastrulation (Sepich et al., 2000). The AV/ML ratio of prdm1 morphant embryos was significantly increased (1.27±0.05) compared with untreated sibling embryos (1.1±0.04; Table 2) (Sepich et al., 2000). This increase of the AV/ML ratio of prdm1 morphant embryos prompted us to investigate the length of the nascent embryonic body (Fig. 7N) (Sepich et al., 2000), which is enlarged in dorsalized mutant embryos at the conclusion of gastrulation (Myers et al., 2002; Sepich and Solnica-Krezel, 2004). Embryonic length of prdm1 morphant embryos was significantly increased to 1551.7±50.7 µm, compared with 1415.2±52.3µm in untreated sibling embryos (Fig. 7N,O; Table 2). However, unlike strongly dorsalized swr/bmp2b or

sbn/smad5embryos, which cease extension of the AP body axis by the end of gastrulation and do not survive early segmentation (Myers et al., 2002), prdm1morphant embryos still exhibited increased embryonic length at early segmentation (Fig. 7P,Q; Table 2). Furthermore, ML width of the developing somites was enlarged in prdm1morphant embryos at 12.5 hpf (Fig. 7R,S).

In order to test whether impaired gastrulation movements are responsible for the morphological defects observed in prdm1

morphant embryos, we tracked the AP extension of the dorsal mesendoderm between onset and conclusion of gastrulation in MOprdm1-injected and untreated sibling embryos (Topczewski et al., 2001). A co-injected caged dextran-fluorescein conjugate was photoactivated at 6 hpf in a small cell population residing at the blastoderm margin dorsally in the embryonic shield or ventrally opposite to the embryonic shield (Fig. 7T). At the end of gastrulation the AP extension of the labeled tissue was measured. In morphant embryos, the labeled mesoderm formed a significantly longer cell array (1042.9±57.1 µm) than in untreated sibling embryos (989.1±49.2µm; Fig. 7U,V; Table 2), revealing increased extension movements of dorsal tissues. Furthermore, consistent with mild dorsalization in MOprdm1 -injected embryos, labeled ventral cell populations underwent almost normal cell movements toward the tailbud exhibiting Fig. 6.MO-induced interference with Prdm1 activity affects DV

patterning. (A,B,G-J,O,P) Lateral view, dorsal to the right.

(C-F) Animal view, dorsal to the right. (K,L) Dorsal view, anterior to the top. (M,N) Animal view, dorsal to the bottom. (K,M;L,N) different views of same embryos. (Q-T) Lateral views, anterior to the left; tailbud region is shown. (A,C,E,G,I,K,M,O,Q,S) Untreated controls (ctrl). (B,D,F,H,J,L,N,P) Embryos microinjected with 2 ng of MOprdm1(MO). (R,T) Embryos microinjected with 1 ng of MOprdm1. (A,B) bmp4expression. (C,D) chdexpression, domain boundaries highlighted (arrows). (E,F) szl expression. (G,H) Reduced ventral expression of bmp4 in morphant smuembryos; lack of ptc1

expression identifies smumutants (not shown). (I,J) Increased dorsal

chd expression in MZoepmutant embryos. (K,L) Mediolateral expansion of forming neural and somitic tissues as revealed by expression of krox20, dlx3band dlc. (M,N) Formation of the prechordal plate was not altered in morphants. (O,P) AP neural patterning, revealed by six3b, pax2aand krox20expression. (Q,R) Ventroposterior expression of gata1in blood precursors. (S,T) Expression of eve1in ventroposterior cells in the tail tip at midsegmentation. Scale bar: 200µm. d, dorsal; r3/rS, rhombomeres 3 and 5; v, ventral. Animal pole highlighted by a black star. The vegetal pole is highlighted by a white star.



mild ectopic AP extension (Fig. 7W,X). By contrast, strongly dorsalized sbn/smad5mutants exhibit a dramatic AP extension of ventral cell populations (Myers et al., 2002).

Late phenotypes

Late loss-of-function phenotypes in slow muscle, photoreceptor cell layer, branchial arches, pectoral fin and cloaca development are presented in Figs S1 and S2 in the supplementary material.


We report the functional analysis of zebrafish prdm1 expressed in a dynamic and complex fashion throughout embryonic development. Previously, Prdm1/Blimp1had been described in human, mouse, chick and frog sharing many expression domains with zebrafish prdm1(Keller and Maniatis, 1991; Turner et al., 1994; Ha and Riddle, 2003; de Souza, 1999). The strong similarities of sequence and expression pattern suggest functional conservation between all vertebrate Prdm1/Blimp1

genes. Conditional targeting of murine Prdm1had revealed its essential role in B lymphocytes for plasmacytic differentiation, including secretion of immunoglobulins (Turner et al., 1994; Shapiro-Shelef et al., 2003). Misexpression of wild-type and dominant-negative forms of Prdm1/Blimp1in X.laevisembryos suggested a role for Prdm1/Blimp1 in head formation (de Souza et al., 1999). A recent report by Baxendale and colleagues (Baxendale et al., 2004) showed that the function of zebrafish Prdm1 is partially inactivated in ubotp39 mutants, revealing an

essential role of this gene in the differentiation of slow muscle downstream of Shh signaling (Roy et al., 2001; Baxendale et al., 2004). The role of Prdm1 in early development was not investigated by that work.

In early mouse and frog gastrulae Prdm1/Blimp1is expressed in equivalent structures, the anterior visceral endoderm and the anterior endomesoderm, respectively, as well as in the presumptive prechordal plate mesoderm, both of which are implicated in forebrain specification and patterning (reviewed by de Souza and Niehrs, 2000; Kiecker and Niehrs, 2001). Similarly, prdm1is expressed in the entire YSL underlying the blastoderm margin shortly before gastrulation starts and after onset of gastrulation, in the anterior portion of the prechordal mesendoderm. Interestingly, in mouse gastrulae, Prdm1/Blimp1

expression was also detected in the posterior visceral endoderm (de Souza et al., 1999), reminiscent of prdm1 expression in ventral and lateral YSL (Fig. 2A,B).

We have addressed the role of Prdm1 during early development in gain-of-function and loss-of-function experiments. Misexpression of Prdm1 primarily caused reduction of dorsoanterior structures similar to defects observed in boz mutants (Solnica-Krezel et al., 1996). Furthermore, expression of the dorsal genes boz, gsc and chd was downregulated. The notion of an important role of Prdm1 in limiting the gastrula organizer function is further supported by the loss-of-function experiments, which revealed that prdm1

morphant embryos were mildly dorsalized at the conclusion of gastrulation. These embryos exhibited an elongation of the Fig. 7.Early loss-of-function phenotype after MO-mediated interference with Prdm1 activity. (A-E) Ventral view, anterior to the left; tail region is shown. (F-I,N-Q,U-X) Lateral view, dorsal to the right. (J-M) Animal view, dorsal to the bottom. (R,S) Dorsal view, anterior to the top; somitic region is shown. (F,J;G,K;H,L;I,M) Different views of same embryo. (A,B,D,F,H,J,L,N,P,R,U,W) Untreated controls (ctrl) . (C,E) Embryos microinjected with 1 ng of MOprdm1(MO). (G,I,K,M,O,Q,S,V,X) Embryos microinjected with 2 ng of MOprdm1. (A) Wild-type tail. (B,C)

Interference with Prdm1 function partially suppressed duplicated fin fold phenotype in ogomutant embryos. (D,E) Similar experiment in din

mutant embryos did not show this effect. (F-I) bmp4expression was reduced after injection of MOprdm1in ogobut not dinmutants. (J-M) Anterior

neural ectoderm was expanded mediolaterally in ogobut not dinmutants injected with MOprdm1(white arrows) compared with untreated siblings

(white open arrows). (N,O) Animal-vegetally elongated morphology of morphant embryos compared with control siblings at the end of gastrulation; dimensions measured are indicated, embryonic length (yellow), dorsal mesoderm extension (green), animal-vegetal axis (red), mediolateral axis (blue). (P,Q) Animal-vegetal elongation of morphant embryonic axis persisted throughout early segmentation. (R,S) Forming somites were mediolaterally expanded. (T) Schematic overview of photoactivation of caged lineage tracer dye, dorsal at the embryonic shield and ventral at the blastoderm margin. (U,V) Tracking of dorsally photoactivated lineage tracer (between green arrows) at the end of gastrulation. (W,X) Tracking movements of ventrally photoactivated lineage tracer (between green arrows) at the end of gastrulation. Scale bars: 150µm in B,D; 200

µm in G,U; 100µm in R. av, animal-vegetal axis; bm, blastoderm margin; d, dorsal; dm, dorsal mesoderm extension; el, embryonic length; es, embryonic shield; ml, mediolateral axis; s5, fifth somite; v, ventral; vm, ventralmost mesoderm; ye, yolk extension.



animal-vegetal axis typical of dorsalized zebrafish mutants (Mullins et al., 1996; Myers et al., 2002). Accordingly, molecular analyses revealed mediolateral expansion of chd expression dorsally and reduction of ventral expression of bmp4 and szl, which encodes another BMP antagonist positively regulated by BMP signaling (Yabe et al., 2003; Martyn et al., 2003). Furthermore, at midsegmentation ventroposterior gata1and eve1

expression was reduced. Additionally, depletion of Prdm1 activity partially suppressed the ventralized ogo mutant phenotype, but had no such effect on chdmutant embryos. This is also in agreement with recent work by Yabe et al. (Yabe et al., 2003), which showed that Chd activity is required for the ogo -dependent dorsalization. We hypothesize that Prdm1 acts directly or indirectly on chdin limiting gastrula organizer function.

In contrast to gain-of-function experiments, expression of

bozand many other dorsal genes downstream of boz, such as

gsc, hhex, six3b, six7, dkk1and nog1, as well as expression of ventral genes such as vox and vent and of the Nodal-related genes ndr1 and ndr2, was not altered in prdm1 morphant embryos. This and the fact that many of the gain-of-function experiments did not reflect endogenous Prdm1 function, led us to propose that although ectopic Prdm1 activity is able to suppress boz expression, its function may not be essential for the regulation of boz and many of its downstream effectors during normal development. We conclude that Prdm1 limits the gastrula organizer function in zebrafish by negatively regulating chd expression, largely via boz independent mechanisms. We hypothesize that Prdm1 regulates boz

expression during normal fish development in a functionally redundant manner with other unknown genes.

Our analyses of morphogenetic defects in prdm1-depleted gastrulae are in support of the molecular data presented above. In embryos deficient in BMP signaling, the characteristic abnormalities in embryonic shape are a consequence of specific alteration of convergence and extension gastrulation movements (Myers et al., 2002). During normal gastrulation strong extension and moderate convergence movements are restricted to the dorsal hemisphere, generating embryos of slightly ovoid shape at the conclusion of gastrulation. Dorsalized sbnmutant embryos exhibit increased elongation of the animal-vegetal dimension and of the AP axis, in part due to slightly increased extension movements of dorsal cell populations (Myers et al., 2002; Sepich and Solnica-Krezel et al., 2004). Our morphometric analyses of prdm1 morphant embryos are consistent with the increased extension movements of dorsal cell populations causing the increased length of the animal-vegetal and AP embryonic axes at the end of the gastrula period, typical of dorsalized mutants.

However, in strongly dorsalized smad5/sbnmutants at early segmentation, AP axis elongation becomes reduced compared

with wild type and premature tail eversion takes place (Myers et al., 2002). Both defects have been attributed to altered cell movements of ventral cell populations. Whereas cells residing in the ventral regions of wild-type gastrulae, and experiencing the highest levels of BMP signaling, do not engage in convergence and extension movements and migrate toward the vegetal pole, in embryos with strongly reduced BMP signaling these cell populations undergo strong extension typical of more dorsal cell populations (Myers et al., 2002). By contrast, prdm1

morphant embryos manifest AP axes longer than wild type at 12.5 hpf, and develop a normal tail. Labeled ventral cell populations of embryos injected with MOprdm1 underwent relatively normal movements toward the tailbud (Fig. 7W,X), consistent with a mild dorsalization of the morphant embryos. Together our gain- and loss-of-function experiments establish a role for Prdm1 in limiting organizer function, uncovering noteworthy similarities and differences to the proposed function of X.laevis Prdm1/Blimp1. In zebrafish embryos prdm1 gain-of-function impaired primarily dorsoanterior structures, whereas in X.laevis it affected the entire anteroposterior axis, without exerting stronger effects on head versus trunk and tail (de Souza et al., 1999). While in agreement with our observations, expression of the BMP antagonist chordinwas downregulated in X.laevisgastrulae overexpressing Prdm1/Blimp1, expression of other organizer genes, such as gscand cerberus (cer), was either unchanged in dorsal marginal zone explants or ectopically induced in ventral explants (de Souza et al., 1999). These data lead to the conclusion that in X.laevisPrdm1/Blimp1 activity is required for head formation via positive regulation of cer

expression (de Souza et al., 1999). Thus specific roles of Prdm1/Blimp1 in the organizer gene regulatory networks might differ between the two systems.

We thank L.S.-K.’s laboratory members for discussions, and B. Appel, J. R. Jessen, T. Van Raay and A. Inbal for critical comments. We thank P. Ingham, K. Artinger and W. Driever for sharing their results before publication. We acknowledge excellent fish care by J. Clanton and A. Bradshaw and thank C. Yin for assistance with confocal microscopy, D. S. Sepich for assistance with photoactivation experiments, and A. Flynt for help with the misexpression experiments. We thank A. Schier and M. Mullins for mutant lines, M. Westerfield, M. Halpern, T. Hirano, P. Ingham, M. Ekker, B. Thisse, C. Thisse, T. Schilling and T. Jowett for probes, and J. Malicki and F. E. Stockdale for a generous gift of antibodies and probes. Work in L.S.-K.’s laboratory is supported by NIH grants GM55101 and GM62283.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material for this article is available at Table 2. Morphometric analyses

Embryonic dimension Age (hpf) Morphant (MO) nMO Untreated (ctrl) nctrl P

Animal-vegetal axis (AV) 10 (tailbud) 832.1±16.3 µm 17* 751.5±22.6 µm 13* 4.4210–10

Mediolateral axis (ML) 10 (tailbud) 656.2±22.5 µm 17* 668.2±12.6 µm 13* 0.077

AV/ML ratio 10 (tailbud) 1.27±0.05 17* 1.12±0.04 13* 6.6110–10

Embryonic length (EL) 10 (tailbud) 1551.7±50.9 µm 17* 1415.2±52.3 µm 13* 1.4310–7

Dorsal mesoderm extension (DM) 10 (tailbud) 1042.9±57.1 µm 11 989.1±49.2 µm 11 0.028

Embryonic length (EL) 12.5 (5 somites) 1753.3±41.3 µm 15 1625.2±7 µm 2 0.028

*Embryos from the same experiment.




Akimenko, M. A., Ekker, M., Wegner, J., Lin, W. and Westerfield, M. (1994). Combinatorial expression of three zebrafish genes related to distal-less: part of a homeobox gene code for the head. J. Neurosci.14, 3475-3486.

Alexander, J. and Stainier, D. Y. (1999). A molecular pathway leading to endoderm formation in zebrafish. Curr. Biol.9, 1147-1157.

Alexander, J., Rothenberg, M., Henry, G. L. and Stainier, D. Y. R. (1999).

casanovaplays an early and essential role in endoderm formation in zebrafish.

Dev. Biol. 215, 343-357.

Bachiller, D., Klingensmith, J., Kemp, C., Belo, J. A., Anderson, R. M., May, S. R., McMahon, J. A., McMahon, A. P., Harland, R. M., Rossant, J. et al. (2000). The organizer factors Chordin and Noggin are required for mouse forebrain development. Nature403, 658-661.

Barresi, M. J., Stickney, H. L. and Devoto, S. H. (2000). The zebrafish slow-muscle-omittedgene product is required for Hedgehog signal transduction and the development of slow muscle identity. Development 127, 2189-2199.

Baxendale, S., Davison, C., Muxworthy, C., Wolff, C., Ingham, P. W. and Roy, S. (2004). The B-cell maturation factor Blimp-1 specifies vertebrate slow-twitch muscle fiber identity inresponse to Hedgehog signaling. Nat. Genet.36, 88-93.

Chang, D. H., Angelin-Duclos, C. and Calame, K. (2000). BLIMP-1: trigger for differentiation of myeloid lineage. Nat. Immunol.1, 169-176.

Chang, D. H., Cattoretti, G. and Calame, K. L. (2002). The dynamic expression pattern of B lymphocyte induced maturation protein-1 (Blimp-1) during mouse embryonic development. Mech. Dev.117, 305-309.

Chen, S. R. and Kimelman, D. (2000). The role of the yolk syncytial layer in germ layer patterning in zebrafish. Development127, 4681-4689.

Chin, A. J., Chen, J.-N. and Weinberg, E. S. (1997). Bone morphogenetic protein-4 expression characterizes inductive boundaries in organs of developing zebrafish. Dev. Genes Evol. 207, 107-114.

Clement, J. H., Fettes, P., Knochel, S., Lef, J. and Knochel, W. (1995). Bone morphogenetic protein 2 in the early development of Xenopus laevis. Mech. Dev.52, 357-370.

Concordet, J. P., Lewis, K. E., Moore, J. W., Goodrich, L. V., Johnson, R. L., Scott, M. P. and Ingham, P. W. (1996). Spatial regulation of a zebrafish

patchedhomologue reflects the roles of sonic hedgehogand protein kinase A in neural tube and somite patterning. Development122, 2835-2846.

De Robertis, E. M., Larraín, J., Oelgeschläger, M. and Wessely, O. (2000). The establishment of Spemann’s organizer and patterning of the vertebrate embryo. Nat. Rev. Genet. 1, 171-181.

de Souza, F. S. and Niehrs, C. (2000). Anterior endoderm and head induction in early vertebrate embryos. Cell Tissue Res.300, 207-217.

de Souza, F. S. J., Gawantka, V., Gomez, A. P., Delius, H., Ang, S.-L. and Niehrs, C. (1999). The zinc finger gene Xblimp1 controls anterior endomesodermal cell fate in Spemann’s organizer. EMBO J.18, 6062-6072.

Detrich, H. W., III, Kieran, M. W., Chan, F. Y., Barone, L. M., Yee, K., Rundstadler, J. A., Pratt, S., Ransom, D. and Zon, L. I. (1995). Intraembryonic hematopoietic cell migration during vertebrate development.

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA92, 10713-10717.

Dickmeis, T., Mourrain, P., Saint-Etienne, L., Fischer, N., Aanstad, P., Clark, M., Strähle, U. and Rosa, F. (2001). A crucial component of the endoderm formation pathway, CASANOVA, is encoded by a novel sox-related gene. Genes Dev.15, 1487-1492.

Dougan, S. T., Warga, R. M., Kane, D. A., Schier, A. F. and Talbot, W. S.

(2003). The role of the zebrafish nodal-related genes squintand cyclopsin patterning of mesendoderm. Development130, 1837-1851.

Erter, C. E., Solnica-Krezel, L. and Wright, C. V. E. (1998). Zebrafish nodal-related 2 encodes an early mesendodermal inducer signaling from the extraembryonic yolk syncytial layer. Dev. Biol.204, 361-372.

Erter, C. E., Wilm, T. P., Basler, N., Wright, C. V. and Solnica-Krezel, L.

(2001). Wnt8 is required in lateral mesendodermal precursors for neural posteriorization in vivo. Development128, 3571-3583.

Fekany, K., Yamanaka, Y., Leung, T., Sirotkin, H. I., Topczewski, J., Gates, M. A., Hibi, M., Renucci, A., Stemple, D., Radbill, A. et al. (1999). The zebrafish bozozoklocus encodes Dharma, a homeodomain protein essential for induction of gastrula organizer and dorsoanterior embryonic structures.

Development 126, 1427-1438.

Fekany-Lee, K., Gonzalez, E., Miller-Bertoglio, V. and Solnica-Krezel, L.

(2000). The homeobox gene bozozok promotes anterior neuroectoderm formation in zebrafish through negative regulation of BMP2/4 and Wnt pathways. Development127, 2333-2345.

Fürthauer, M., Thisse, B. and Thisse, C. (1999). Three different noggingenes antagonize the activity of bone morphogenetic proteins in the zebrafish embryo. Dev. Biol.214, 181-196.

Gonzalez, E. M., Fekany-Lee, K., Carmany-Rampey, A., Erter, C., Topczewski, J., Wright, C. V. E. and Solnica-Krezel, L. (2000). Head and trunk in zebrafish arise via coinhibition of BMP signaling by bozozok and

chordino. Genes Dev.14, 3087-3092.

Gritsman, K., Zhang, J., Cheng, S., Heckscher, E., Talbot, W. S. and Schier, A. F. (1999). The EGF-CFC protein one-eyed pinhead is essential for nodal signaling. Cell97, 121-132.

Ha, A. S. and Riddle, R. D. (2003). cBlimp-1expression in chick limb bud development. Gene Expr. Patterns.3, 297-300.

Hammerschmidt, M. and Mullins, M. C. (2002). Dorsoventral patterning in the zebrafish: bone morphogenetic proteins and beyond. Results Probl. Cell Differ.40, 72-95.

Hammerschmidt, M., Pelegri, F., Mullins, M. C., Kane, D. A., van Eeden, F. J., Granato, M., Brand, M., Furutani-Seiki, M., Haffter, P., Heisenberg, C. P. et al. (1996). dino and mercedes, two genes regulating dorsal development in the zebrafish embryo. Development123, 95-102.

Hashimoto, H., Itoh, M., Yamanaka, Y., Yamashita, S., Shimizu, T., Solnica-Krezel, L., Hibi, M. and Hirano, T. (2000). Zebrafish Dkk1 functions in forebrain specification and axial mesendoderm formation. Dev. Biol.217, 138-152.

Hatta, K., Bremiller, R., Westerfield, M. and Kimmel, C. B. (1991). Diversity of expression of engrailed-like antigens in zebrafish. Development112, 821-832.

Hibi, M., Hirano, T. and Dawid, I. B. (2002). Organizer formation and function. Results Probl. Cell Diff.40, 48-71.

Hild, M., Dick, A., Rauch, G. J., Meier, A., Bouwmeester, T., Haffter, P. and Hammerschmidt, M. (1999). The smad5mutation somitabun blocks Bmp2b signaling during early dorsoventral patterning of the zebrafish embryo.

Development126, 2149-2159.

Ho, C. Y., Houart, C., Wilson, S. W. and Stainier, D. Y. (1999). A role for the extraembryonic yolk syncytial layer in patterning the zebrafish embryo suggested by properties of the hexgene. Curr. Biol.9, 1131-1134.

Imai, Y., Gates, M. A., Melby, A. E., Kimelman, D., Schier, A. F. and Talbot, W. S. (2001). The homeobox genes voxand ventare redundant repressors of dorsal fates in zebrafish. Development128, 2407-2420.

Joly, J. S., Joly, C., Schulte-Merker, S., Boulekbache, H. and Condamine, H. (1993). The ventral and posterior expression of the zebrafish homeobox gene eve1is perturbed in dorsalized and mutant embryos. Development119, 1261-1275.

Kawahara, A., Wilm, T., Solnica-Krezel, L. and Dawid, I. B. (2000a). Antagonistic role of vega1and bozozok/dharmahomeobox genes in organizer formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA97, 12121-12126.

Kawahara, A., Wilm, T., Solnica-Krezel, L. and Dawid, I. B. (2000b). Functional interaction of vega2and goosecoidhomeobox genes in zebrafish.

Genesis28, 58-67.

Keller, A. D. and Maniatis, T. (1991). Identification and characterization of a novel repressor of beta-interferon gene expression. Genes Dev.5, 868-879.

Kelly, G. M., Greenstein, P., Erezyilmaz, D. F. and Moon, R. T. (1995). Zebrafish wnt8and wnt8bshare a common activity but are involved in distinct developmental pathways. Development121, 1787-1799.

Kiecker, C. and Niehrs, C. (2001). The role of prechordal mesendoderm in neural patterning. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.11, 27-33.

Kikuchi, Y., Trinh, L. A., Reiter, J. F., Alexander, J., Yelon, D. and Stainier, D. Y. (2000). The zebrafish bonnie and clydegene encodes a Mix family homeodomain protein that regulates the generation of endodermal precursors.

Genes Dev.14, 1279-1289.

Kikuchi, Y., Agathon, A., Alexander, J., Thisse, C., Waldron, S., Yelon, D., Thisse, B. and Stainier, D. Y. (2001). casanovaencodes a novel Sox-related protein necessary and sufficient for early endoderm formation in zebrafish.

Genes Dev.15, 1493-1505.

Kimmel, C. B., Ballard, W. B., Kimmel, S. R., Ullmann, B. and Schilling, T. F. (1995). Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev. Dyn.203, 253-310.

Kishimoto, Y., Lee, K. H., Zon, L., Hammerschmidt, M. and Schulte-Merker, S. (1997). The molecular nature of zebrafish swirl: BMP2 function is essential during early dorsoventral patterning. Development124, 4457-4466.

Kobayashi, M., Toyama, R., Takeda, H., Dawid, I. B. and Kawakami, K.

(1998). Overexpression of the forebrain-specific homeobox gene six3induces rostral forebrain enlargement in zebrafish. Development125, 2973-2982.

Koos, D. S. and Ho, R. K. (1998). The nieuwkoidgene characterizes and mediates a Nieuwkoop-center-like activity in the zebrafish. Curr. Biol. 8, 1199-1206.

Koos, D. S. and Ho, R. K. (1999). The nieuwkoid/dharmahomeobox gene is



Fig. 1. Sequence alignment of putative vertebrate Prdm1/Blimp1proteins to zebrafish Prdm1 (D
Fig. 1. Sequence alignment of putative vertebrate Prdm1/Blimp1proteins to zebrafish Prdm1 (D p.3
Fig. 2. Expression of prdm1 during embryogenesis. (A-C,F-H) Lateral view, dorsal to the right
Fig. 2. Expression of prdm1 during embryogenesis. (A-C,F-H) Lateral view, dorsal to the right p.4
Fig. 3. Placing prdm1 in genetic hierarchies. (A-D) Lateral view, dorsal to the right
Fig. 3. Placing prdm1 in genetic hierarchies. (A-D) Lateral view, dorsal to the right p.5
Fig. 4. prdm1somitogenesis. (S) expressivity. (U) expression; independent females (#1-3)
Fig. 4. prdm1somitogenesis. (S) expressivity. (U) expression; independent females (#1-3) p.6
Fig. 6O,P). At mid-somitogenesis (16 hpf), expression of theventral tissue markers gata1 in blood precursors and eve1 inventroposterior cells in the tail were reduced in 94% (=139)
Fig. 6O,P). At mid-somitogenesis (16 hpf), expression of theventral tissue markers gata1 in blood precursors and eve1 inventroposterior cells in the tail were reduced in 94% (=139) p.7
Table 1. Evaluation of efficiency and specificity of morpholino-based Prdm1 knockdown

Table 1.

Evaluation of efficiency and specificity of morpholino-based Prdm1 knockdown p.7
Fig. 6. MO-induced interference with Prdm1 activity affects DVpatterning. (A,B,G-J,O,P) Lateral view, dorsal to the right.
Fig. 6. MO-induced interference with Prdm1 activity affects DVpatterning. (A,B,G-J,O,P) Lateral view, dorsal to the right. p.8
Fig. 7. Early loss-of-function phenotype after MO-mediated interference with Prdm1 activity
Fig. 7. Early loss-of-function phenotype after MO-mediated interference with Prdm1 activity p.9
Table 2. Morphometric analyses

Table 2.

Morphometric analyses p.10