• No results found

Leap Zagreb Indices of Some Wheel Related Graphs Shiladhar P., A. M

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Leap Zagreb Indices of Some Wheel Related Graphs Shiladhar P., A. M"

Copied!
11
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Leap Zagreb Indices of Some Wheel Related Graphs

Shiladhar P., A. M. Naji and N. D. Soner Department of Studies in Mathematics,

University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysuru-570 006, INDIA.

email:shiladharpawar@gmail.com and ndsoner@yahoo.co.in.

(Received on: March 12, 2018)

ABSTRACT

Recently, A. M. Naji et al.10, introduced leap Zagreb indices of a graph based on the second degrees of vertices (number of their second neighbours). The first leap Zagreb index 𝐿𝑀1(𝐺) is equal to the sum of squares of the second degrees of the vertices, the second leap Zagreb index 𝐿𝑀2(𝐺) is equal to the sum of the products of the second degrees of pairs of adjacent vertices of G and the third leap Zagreb index 𝐿𝑀3(𝐺) is equal to the sum of the products of the first degrees with the second degrees of the vertices. In this paper, exact expressions for leap Zagreb indices of wheel 𝑊𝑛, and some related graphs as gear 𝐺𝑛, helm 𝐻𝑛, flower 𝐹𝑙𝑛 and sunflower 𝑆𝑓𝑛 graphs are computed.

2010 Mathematics Subject Classification : 05C07, 05C12, 05C76.

Keywords: Degrees, Second degrees (of vertex), Leap Zagreb indices, Wheel graphs.

1. INTRODUCTION

In this paper, we are concerned only with simple graphs, i.e., finite graphs having no

loops, multiple and directed edges. Let 𝐺 = (𝑉, 𝐸) be such a graph with vertex set 𝑉 (𝐺) and

edges set 𝐸(𝐺). As usual, we denote by 𝑛 = | 𝑉| and 𝑚 = | 𝐸 | to the number of vertices and

edges in a graph 𝐺, respectively. The distance 𝑑

𝐺

(𝑢, 𝑣) between any two vertices u and v of a

graph 𝐺 is equal to the length of (number of edges in) a shortest path connecting them. For a

vertex 𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝐺) and a positive integer 𝑘, the open 𝑘-neighborhood of 𝑣 in a graph 𝐺 is

denoted by 𝑁

𝑘

(𝑣/𝐺) and is defined as 𝑁

𝑘

(𝑣/𝐺) = {𝑢 ∈ 𝑉 (𝐺) ∶ 𝑑

𝐺

(𝑢, 𝑣) = 𝑘}. The k-

distance degree of a vertex v in G is denoted by 𝑑

𝑘

(𝑣/𝐺) (or simply 𝑑

𝑘

(𝑣) if no

misunderstanding) and is defined as the number of k- neighbours of the vertex v in G, i.e.,

𝑑

𝑘

(𝑣/𝐺) = |𝑁

𝑘

(𝑣/𝐺)|. It is clearly that 𝑑

1

(𝑣/𝐺) = 𝑑(𝑣/𝐺) for every 𝑣 ∈ 𝑉(𝐺). For a

vertex v of G, the eccentricity 𝑒(𝑣) = 𝑚𝑎𝑥{𝑑

𝐺

(𝑣, 𝑢) ∶ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑉 (𝐺)}. The diameter of G is

(2)

𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑚(𝐺) = 𝑚𝑎𝑥{𝑒(𝑣) ∶ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝐺)} and the radius of G is 𝑟𝑎𝑑(𝐺) = 𝑚𝑖𝑛{𝑒(𝑣) 𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝐺)}. For any terminology or notation not mention here, we refer to

9

.

A topological index of a graph is a graph invariant number calculated from a graph representing a molecule and applicable in chemistry. The Zagreb indices have been introduced, more than forty four years ago, by I. Gutman and Trinajestic

7

, in 1972, and elaborated in

6

. They are defined as:

𝑀

1

( 𝐺) = ∑ 𝑑

12

( 𝑣/𝐺)

𝑣∈𝑉( 𝐺)

and

𝑀

2

(𝐺) = ∑ 𝑑

1

𝑢,𝑣∈𝐸( 𝐺)

( 𝑢/𝐺) 𝑑

1

(𝑣/𝐺) .

For properties of the two Zagreb indices see

2,3,6,12,15

and the papers cited therein. In recent years, some novel variants of ordinary Zagreb indices have been introduced and studied, such as Zagreb coincides

1,8

, multiplicative Zagreb indices

5,13,15

, multiplicative sum Zagreb index

4,14

, and multiplicative Zagreb coincides

16

and etc.

Recently, A. M. Naji et al.

10

, have been introduced a new distance-degree-based topological indices conceived depending on the second degrees of vertices (number of their second neighbours), and are so-called leap Zagreb indices of a graph G and are defined as, respectively.

𝐿𝑀

1

(𝐺) = ∑ 𝑑

22

(𝑣/𝐺)

𝑣∈𝑉(𝐺)

.

𝐿𝑀

2

(𝐺) = ∑ 𝑑

2

(𝑢/𝐺) 𝑑

2

(𝑣/𝐺)

𝑢𝑣∈𝐸(𝐺)

.

𝐿𝑀

3

(𝐺) = ∑ 𝑑(𝑢/𝐺) 𝑑

2

(𝑣/𝐺)

𝑣∈𝑉(𝐺)

.

For properties of the leap Zagreb indices see

10,11

.

In this paper, the explicit formulae for leap Zagreb indices of wheel and some related graph are presented.

2. MAIN RESULT

Definition.2.1. The wheel graph 𝑊

𝑛

with 𝑛 + 1 vertices is defined to be the join of 𝐾

1

and 𝐶

𝑛

, where 𝐾

1

is the complete graph with one vertex and 𝐶

𝑛

is the cycle graph with n vertices.

Clearly, |V (𝑊

𝑛

)| = n + 1 and |E (𝑊

𝑛

)| = 2n. The vertex corresponding to 𝐾

1

is known as apex

while the vertices corresponding to 𝐶

𝑛

are 𝐾

1

known as rim vertices.

(3)

Figure 1: Wheel graph 𝑾𝒏.

Lemma 2.1. Let 𝑊

𝑛

be a wheel graph with n+1 vertices ( as shown in fig. 1 ).Then we have 𝑑(𝑣

0

) = 𝑛, 𝑑

2

(𝑣

0

) = 0.

𝑑(𝑣

𝑖

) = 3, 𝑑

2

(𝑣

𝑖

) = 𝑛 − 3.

Theorem 2.2. Let 𝑊

𝑛

, n ≥ 4 be a wheel graph with n+1 vertices. Then 1) 𝐿𝑀

1

(𝑊

𝑛

) = 𝑛(𝑛

2

− 6𝑛 + 9)

2) 𝐿𝑀

2

( 𝑊

𝑛

) = 𝑛( 𝑛 − 3)

2

3) 𝐿𝑀

3

( 𝑊

𝑛

) = 3𝑛(𝑛 − 3).

Proof. Let 𝑊

𝑛

, 𝑛 ≥ 4 be a wheel with 𝑛 + 1 vertices and let 𝑣

0

,𝑣

1,

…, 𝑣

𝑛

be a vertices set of 𝑤

𝑛

, where 𝑣

0

be the apex vertex and 𝑣

1,

𝑣

2,

…,𝑣

𝑛

be the rim vertices of 𝑊

𝑛

.

1) By Lemma 2.1., and 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝐿𝑀

1

( 𝐺) 𝑤𝑒 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 , 𝐿𝑀

1

(𝑊

𝑛

) = ∑ 𝑑

22

𝑣∈𝑉( 𝑊𝑛)

(𝑣)

= 𝑑

22

(𝑣

0

) + ∑ 𝑑

22

𝑛

𝑖=1

(𝑣

𝑖

)

= 0 + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

1(𝑛 − 3)

2

= 0 + 𝑛(𝑛 − 3)

2

= 𝑛(𝑛

2

− 6𝑛 + 9)

Therefore 𝐿𝑀

1

(𝑊

𝑛

) = 𝑛(𝑛

2

− 6𝑛 + 9). ∎

2) From figure 1., we have two types of edges 𝑣

0

𝑣

𝑖

and 𝑣

𝑖

𝑣

𝑖+1

, for indices being taken modolu 𝑛, and from definition of L𝑀

2

(𝐺) we have,

𝐿𝑀

2

(𝑊

𝑛

) = ∑ 𝑑

2

𝑢,𝑣∈𝐸(𝑊𝑛)

(𝑣

0

)𝑑

2

(𝑣)

(4)

= ∑

𝑣0𝑣

𝑑

2

𝑖∈𝐸(𝑊𝑛)

(𝑣

0

)𝑑

2

(𝑣

𝑖

) + ∑

𝑛𝑣𝑖𝑣

𝑑

2

𝑖+1∈𝐸(𝑊𝑛)

(𝑣

𝑖

)𝑑

2

(𝑣

𝑖+1

) = 0 + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

(𝑛 − 3)(𝑛 − 3)

= 0 + 𝑛 (𝑛 − 3)

2

Therefore, 𝐿𝑀

2(𝑊𝑛)

= 𝑛( 𝑛 − 3)

2

. ∎ 3) From definition of L𝑀

3

(𝐺) we have,

𝐿𝑀

3

(𝑊

𝑛

) = ∑ 𝑑(𝑣) 𝑑

2

(𝑣)

𝑣∈𝑉(𝑊𝑛)

= 𝑑(𝑣

0

)𝑑

2

(𝑣

0

) + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

𝑑 (𝑣

𝑖

)𝑑

2

(𝑣

𝑖

) = 0 + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

3(𝑛 − 3 )

= 3𝑛(𝑛 − 3)

Therefore 𝐿𝑀

3

(𝑤

𝑛

) = 3𝑛(𝑛 − 3). ∎

Definition 2.2. The gear graph 𝐺

𝑛

, also sometimes known as a bipartite wheel graph, is a graph obtained from wheel graph 𝑊

𝑛

by added a vertex between each pair of adjacent rim vertices. It contains three type of vertices, the vertex of degree n called apex, n vertices of degree three and n vertices of degree two. The gear graph 𝐺

𝑛

has 2n+1 vertices and 3n edges.

Figure 2: Gear graph 𝑮𝒏.

Lemma 2.3. Let 𝐺

𝑛

be a gear graph with 2𝑛 + 1 vertices ( as shown in fig. 2). Then we have, 𝑑(𝑣

0

) = 𝑛 𝑑

2

(𝑣

0

) = 𝑛

𝑑(𝑣

𝑖

) = 3 𝑑

2

(𝑣

𝑖

) = 𝑛 − 1 𝑑(𝑢

𝑖

) = 2 𝑑

2

(𝑢

𝑖

) = 3 Theorem 2.4. Let 𝐺

𝑛

be a gear graph with 2𝑛 + 1 vertices. Then 1) L𝑀

1

(𝐺

𝑛

) = 𝑛(𝑛

2

− 𝑛 + 10).

2) 𝐿𝑀

2

(𝐺

𝑛

) = 𝑛(𝑛 − 1)(𝑛 + 6).

3) 𝐿𝑀

3

(𝐺

𝑛

) = 𝑛( 4𝑛 + 3).

(5)

Proof. Let 𝐺

𝑛

be a gear graph and let 𝑣

0

be the apex vertex, 𝑣

𝑛

, 𝑣

2

, 𝑣

3

, … , 𝑣

𝑛

be the vertices of 𝐺

𝑛

with three degree and 𝑢

1

, 𝑢

2

, … , 𝑢

𝑛

be the vertices of 𝐺

𝑛

with two degree.

1) By Lemma 2.3., and from definition of L𝑀

1

(𝐺) , we have , 𝐿𝑀

1

(𝐺

𝑛

) = ∑ 𝑑

22

(𝑣)

𝑣∈𝑉(𝐺𝑛)

.

= 𝑑

22

(𝑣

0

) + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

𝑑

22

(𝑣

𝑖

) + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

𝑑

22

(𝑢

𝑖

) = 𝑛

2

+ ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

(𝑛 − 1)

2

+ ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

3

2

= 𝑛

2

+ 𝑛(𝑛 − 1)

2

+ 3

2

𝑛 = 𝑛

2

+ 𝑛(𝑛

2

− 2𝑛 + 1) + 9𝑛 = 𝑛

2

+ 𝑛

3

− 2𝑛

2

+ 𝑛 + 9𝑛 = 𝑛

3

− 𝑛

2

+ 10𝑛

= 𝑛( 𝑛

2

− 𝑛 + 10).

Therefore 𝐿𝑀

1

(𝐺

𝑛

) = 𝑛( 𝑛

2

− 𝑛 + 10). ∎ 2) From definition of L𝑀

2

( 𝐺), we have ,

𝐿𝑀

2

(𝐺

𝑛

) = ∑

𝑢𝑣∈𝐸( 𝑍𝑛)

𝑑

2

(𝑢)𝑑

2

(𝑣)

= ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

𝑑

2

(𝑣

0

)𝑑

2

(𝑣𝑖) + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

𝑑

2

( 𝑢

𝑖

) 𝑑

2

( 𝑣

𝑖

) = ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

𝑛(𝑛 − 1 ) + ∑

2𝑛𝑖=1

3(𝑛 − 1)

= 𝑛 . 𝑛 (𝑛 − 1) + 2𝑛. 3(𝑛 − 1) = 𝑛

2

(𝑛 − 1) + 6𝑛(𝑛 − 1) = 𝑛

3

− 𝑛

2

+ 6𝑛

2

− 6𝑛 Therefore, L𝑀

2

(𝐺

𝑛

) = 𝑛(𝑛 − 1)(𝑛+6). ∎ 3) From definition of L𝑀

3

( 𝐺), we have,

𝐿𝑀

3

(𝐺

𝑛

) = ∑ 𝑑(𝑣)𝑑

2

(𝑣)

𝑣∈𝑉(𝐺𝑛)

.

= 𝑑(𝑣

0

)𝑑

2

(𝑣

0

) + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

𝑑(𝑣

𝑖

) 𝑑

2

(𝑣

𝑖

) + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

𝑑 (𝑢

𝑖

)𝑑

2

(𝑢

𝑖

) = 𝑛 . 𝑛 + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

3 (𝑛 − 1) + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

2 (3)

= 𝑛

2

+ 3𝑛(𝑛 − 1) + 6𝑛 = 𝑛

2

+ 3𝑛

2

− 3𝑛 + 6𝑛 = 4𝑛

2

+ 3n

Therefore 𝐿𝑀

3

(𝐺

𝑛

) = 𝑛(4𝑛 + 3). ∎

Definition 2.3. The helm graph 𝐻

𝑛

is a graph obtained from wheel graph 𝑊

𝑛

by attaching a

pendant edge to each rim vertex. The helm graph contains three types of vertices, the vertex

of degree n called apex, n pendant vertices and n rim vertices of degree four. The helm graph

𝐻

𝑛

has 2n + 1 vertices and 3n edges.

(6)

Figure 3 : Helm graph 𝑯𝒏

Lemma 2.5. Let 𝐻

𝑛

be a helm graph with 2n + 1 vertices( as shown in fig. 3). Then we have, 𝑑(𝑣

0

) = 𝑛 𝑑

2

(𝑣

0

) = 𝑛

𝑑(𝑣

𝑖

) = 4 𝑑

2

(𝑣

𝑖

) = 𝑛 − 1 𝑑(𝑢

𝑖

) = 1 𝑑

2

(𝑢

𝑖

) = 3 Theorem 2.6. Let 𝐻

𝑛

be a helm graph with 2n + 1 vertices. Then 1) 𝐿𝑀

1

(𝐻

𝑛

) = 𝑛( 𝑛

2

– 𝑛 + 10)

2) 𝐿𝑀

2

(𝐻

𝑛

) = 2𝑛( 𝑛

2

− 1) 3) 𝐿𝑀

3

(𝐻

𝑛

) = 𝑛(5𝑛 − 1).

Proof . Let 𝐻

𝑛

be a helm graph with 2n + 1 vertices and let 𝑣

0

be the apex vertex, 𝑣

1

, 𝑣

2

, 𝑣

3

, … , 𝑣

𝑛

be the rim vertices with four degrees and 𝑢

1

, 𝑢

2

, 𝑢

3

, … , 𝑢

𝑛

be the pendant vertices.

1) By Lemma. 2.5., and from definition of L𝑀

1

( 𝐺), we have,

𝐿𝑀

1

(𝐻

𝑛

) = ∑ 𝑑

22

(𝑣)

𝑣∈𝑉(𝐻𝑛)

.

= 𝑑

22

(𝑣

0

) + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

𝑑

22

(𝑣

𝑖

) + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

𝑑

22

(𝑢

𝑖

) = 𝑛

2

+ 𝑛(𝑛 − 1)

2

+ 3

2

𝑛

= 𝑛

2

+ 𝑛( 𝑛

2

− 2𝑛 + 1) + 9𝑛 = 𝑛

2

+ 𝑛

3

− 2𝑛

2

+ 𝑛 + 9𝑛 = 𝑛

3

− 𝑛

2

+ 10𝑛

Therefore L𝑀

1

(𝐻

𝑛

) = 𝑛( 𝑛

2

− 𝑛 + 10). ∎ 2) From definition of L𝑀

2

( 𝐺), we have,

(7)

𝐿𝑀

2

(𝐻

𝑛

) = ∑ 𝑑

2

(𝑢)

𝑢𝑣∈𝐸( 𝐻𝑛)

𝑑

2

(𝑣)

= ∑ 𝑑

2

( 𝑣

0

)

𝑛

𝑣0,𝑣𝑖∈𝐸(𝐻𝑛)

𝑑

2

(𝑣

𝑖

) + ∑ 𝑑

2

𝑛

𝑣𝑖,𝑢𝑖

(𝑣

𝑖

)𝑑

2

(𝑢

𝑖

) + ∑ 𝑑

2

𝑛

𝑣𝑖,𝑣𝑖+1

(𝑣

𝑖

)𝑑

2

( 𝑣

𝑖+1

) = ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

𝑛 ( 𝑛 − 1 ) + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

(𝑛 − 1) 3 + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

( 𝑛 − 1 ) (𝑛 − 1) = 𝑛

2

( 𝑛 − 1) + 3𝑛(𝑛 − 1) + 𝑛(𝑛 − 1)

2

= 𝑛

3

− 𝑛

2

+ 3𝑛

2

− 3𝑛 + 𝑛( 𝑛

2

− 2𝑛 + 1) = 𝑛

3

− 𝑛

2

+ 3𝑛

2

− 3𝑛 + 𝑛

3

− 2𝑛

2

+ 𝑛 = 2𝑛

3

− 2𝑛

Therefore L𝑀

2

(𝐻

𝑛

) = 2𝑛(𝑛

2

− 1). ∎

3) From definition of L𝑀

3

( 𝐺), we have, 𝐿𝑀

3

(𝐻

𝑛

) = ∑ 𝑑(𝑣)𝑑

2

𝑣∈𝑉(𝐻𝑛)

(𝑣).

= 𝑑(𝑣

0

)𝑑

2

(𝑣

0

) + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

𝑑 (𝑣

𝑖

)𝑑

2

(𝑣

𝑖

) + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

𝑑 (𝑢

𝑖

)𝑑

2

(𝑣

𝑖

) = 𝑛 . 𝑛 + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

4 ( n − 1) + ∑

ni=1

1 ( 3)

= 𝑛

2

+ 4𝑛( 𝑛 − 1) + 3𝑛 = 𝑛

2

+ 4𝑛

2

− 4𝑛 + 3𝑛 = 5𝑛

2

− 𝑛

Therefore L𝑀

3

(𝐻

𝑛

) = 𝑛 (5𝑛 − 1). ∎

Definition 2.4. The flower graph 𝐹𝑙

𝑛

is a graph obtained from a helm graph by joining each pendant vertex to the apex of the helm graph. There are three types of vertices, the apex of degree 2n, n vertices of degree four and n vertices of degree two. The flower graph 𝐹𝑙

𝑛

has 2n + 1 vertices and 4n edges.

Figure 4 : Flower graph 𝑭𝒍𝒏.

(8)

Lemma 2.7., Let 𝐹𝑙

𝑛

be a flower graph with 2n + 1 vertices ( as shown in fig. 4). Then we have, 𝑑(𝑣

0

) = 2𝑛 , 𝑑

2

(𝑣

0

) = 0,

𝑑(𝑣

𝑖

) = 4 , 𝑑

2

(𝑣

𝑖

) = 𝑛 − 5, 𝑑(𝑣

𝑖

) = 2, 𝑑

2

(𝑢

𝑖

) = 𝑛 − 2 . Theorem 2.8. Let 𝐹𝑙

𝑛

be a flower graph with 2n + 1 vertices. Then 1) L𝑀

1

(𝐹𝑙

𝑛

) = 𝑛(2𝑛

2

− 14𝑛 + 29 )

2) 𝐿𝑀

2

(𝐹𝑙

𝑛

) = 𝑛(2𝑛

2

− 17𝑛 + 35) 3) 𝐿𝑀

3

( 𝐹𝑙

𝑛

) = 2𝑛( 3𝑛 − 12).

Proof. Let 𝐹𝑙

𝑛

be a flower graph with 2n + 1 vertices, 4n edges and let 𝑣

0

be the apex vertex, 𝑣

1

, 𝑣

2

, 𝑣

3

, … , 𝑣

𝑛

be the rim vertices with four degrees and 𝑢

1

, 𝑢

2

, 𝑢

3

, … , 𝑢

𝑛

be the extreme vertices with two degrees. Since 𝑑(𝑣

0

) = 2𝑛.

1) By Lemma 2.7., and from definition of L𝑀

1

( 𝐺), we have, 𝐿𝑀

1

(𝐹𝑙

𝑛

) = ∑ 𝑑

22

(𝑣).

𝑣∈𝑉(𝐹𝑙𝑛)

= 𝑑

22

(𝑣

0

) + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

𝑑

22

(𝑣

𝑖

) + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

𝑑

22

(𝑢

𝑖

) = 0 + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

( 𝑛 − 5)

2

+ ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

( 𝑛 − 2)

2

= 𝑛( 𝑛 − 5)

2

+ 𝑛(𝑛 − 2)

2

= 𝑛( 𝑛

2

− 10𝑛 + 25) + 𝑛( 𝑛

2

− 4𝑛 + 4) = 𝑛

3

− 10𝑛

2

+ 25𝑛 + 𝑛

3

− 4𝑛

2

+ 4𝑛 = 2𝑛

3

− 14𝑛

2

+ 29𝑛

Therefore 𝐿𝑀

1

(𝐹𝑙

𝑛

) = 𝑛(2𝑛

2

− 14𝑛 + 29). ∎

2) From figure 4., we have four types of edges,𝑣

0

𝑣

𝑖

, 𝑣

0

𝑢

𝑖

, 𝑣

𝑖

𝑢

𝑖

𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑣

𝑖

𝑣

𝑖+1

, 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑖 = 1,2, … , 𝑛 and definition of L𝑀

2

( 𝐺), we have,

𝐿𝑀

2

(𝐹𝑙

𝑛

) = ∑ 𝑑

2

𝑢,𝑣 ∈𝐸(𝐹𝑙𝑛)

(𝑢

𝑖

)𝑑

2

(𝑣

𝑖

)

= ∑𝑛 𝑑2

𝑖=1 ( 𝑣0)𝑑2(𝑣𝑖) + ∑𝑛 𝑑2

𝑖=1 (𝑣0)𝑑2(𝑢𝑖) + ∑𝑛 𝑑2

𝑖=1 (𝑣𝑖)𝑑2(𝑢𝑖) + ∑𝑛 𝑑2

𝑖=1 (𝑣𝑖)𝑑2(𝑣𝑖+1)

= 0 + 0 + 𝑛( 𝑛 − 5)( 𝑛 − 2) + 𝑛 ( 𝑛 − 5) ( 𝑛 − 5)

= 𝑛(𝑛 − 5)[(𝑛 − 2) + (𝑛 − 5) ] = 𝑛(𝑛 − 5) ( 2𝑛 − 7)

= 2𝑛

3

− 7𝑛

2

− 10𝑛

2

+ 35

Therefore L𝑀

2

(𝐹𝑙

𝑛

) = 𝑛( 2𝑛

2

− 17𝑛 + 35). ∎ 3) Form definition of L𝑀

3

( 𝐺) we have,

𝐿𝑀

3

(𝐹𝑙

𝑛

) = ∑ 𝑑(𝑣)𝑑

2

( 𝑣)

𝑣∈𝑉( 𝐹𝑙𝑛)

.

= 𝑑(𝑣

0

)𝑑

2

( 𝑣

0

) + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

𝑑 ( 𝑣

𝑖

)𝑑

2

( 𝑣

𝑖

) + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

𝑑 (𝑢

𝑖

)𝑑

2

(𝑢

𝑖

)

(9)

= 0 + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

4 (𝑛 − 5) + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

2 (𝑛 − 2) = 4𝑛(𝑛 − 5) + 2𝑛( 𝑛 − 2)

= 4𝑛

2

− 20𝑛 + 2𝑛

2

− 4𝑛 = 6𝑛

2

− 24𝑛

Therefore L𝑀

3

(𝐹𝑙

𝑛

) = 2𝑛( 3𝑛 − 12). ∎

Definition 2.5. The sunflower graph 𝑆𝑓

𝑛

is the graph obtained from the flower graph 𝐹𝑙

𝑛

by attaching n pendant edges to the apex vertex. 𝑆𝑓

𝑛

has four types of vertices, the apex of 3n, n vertices of degree four, n vertices of degree two and n pendant vertices.

Figure 5 : Sunflower graph 𝑺𝒇𝒏.

Lemma 2.9. Let 𝑆𝑓

𝑛

be a sunflower graph with 3n + 1 vertices ( as shown in fig. 5).Then we have, 𝑑(𝑣

0

) = 3𝑛, 𝑑

2

(𝑣

0

) = 0,

𝑑(𝑣

𝑖

) = 4 , 𝑑

2

(𝑣

𝑖

) = 3𝑛 − 4, 𝑑(𝑢

𝑖

) = 2, 𝑑

2

(𝑢

𝑖

) = 3𝑛 − 2 , 𝑑(𝑤

𝑖

) = 1, 𝑑

2

(𝑤

𝑖

) = 3𝑛 − 1.

Theorem 2.10. Let 𝑆𝑓

𝑛

be a sunflower graph with 3n + 1 vertices. Then 1) L𝑀

1

(𝑆𝑓

𝑛

) = 3𝑛( 9𝑛

2

− 14𝑛 + 7)

2) 𝐿𝑀

2

(𝑆𝑓

𝑛

) = 6𝑛( 3𝑛

2

− 7𝑛 + 4) 3) 𝐿𝑀

3

(𝑆𝑓

𝑛

) = 21𝑛( 𝑛 − 1).

Proof. Let 𝑆𝑓

𝑛

be a sunflower graph with 3n + 1 vertices, 5n edges and let 𝑣

0

be the apex vertex, 𝑣

1

, 𝑣

2

, 𝑣

3

, … , 𝑣

𝑛

be the rim vertices with four degrees and 𝑢

1

, 𝑢

2

, 𝑢

3

, … , 𝑢

𝑛

be the extreme vertices with two degrees. since d(𝑣

0

)= 3n.

1) By Lemma 2.9., and from definition of L𝑀

1

(𝐺), we have, 𝐿𝑀

1

(𝑆𝑓

𝑛

) = ∑

𝑣∈𝑉(𝑆𝑓𝑛)

𝑑

22

( 𝑣).

= ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

𝑑

22

(𝑣

0

) + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

𝑑

22

(𝑣

𝑖

) + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

𝑑

22

(𝑢

𝑖

) + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

𝑑

22

(𝑤

𝑖

)

= 0 + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

( 3𝑛 − 4)

2

+ ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

( 3𝑛 − 2)

2

+ ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

( 3𝑛 − 1)

2

(10)

= 𝑛( 3𝑛 − 4)

2

+ 𝑛(3𝑛 − 2)

2

+ 𝑛( 3𝑛 − 1)

2

= 𝑛( 9𝑛

2

− 24𝑛 + 16) + 𝑛( 9𝑛

2

− 12𝑛 + 4) + 𝑛(9𝑛

2

− 6𝑛 + 1) = 9𝑛

3

− 24𝑛

2

+ 16𝑛 + 9𝑛

3

− 12𝑛

2

+ 4𝑛 + 9𝑛

3

− 6𝑛

2

+ 𝑛 = 27𝑛

3

− 42𝑛

2

+ 21𝑛

Therefore 𝐿𝑀

1

(𝑆𝑓

𝑛

) = 3𝑛(9𝑛

2

− 14𝑛 + 7). ∎

2) From definition of L𝑀

2

(𝐺)we have, 𝐿𝑀

2

(𝑆𝑓

𝑛

) = ∑ 𝑑

2

(𝑢)𝑑

2

(𝑣).

𝑢𝑣∈𝐸(𝑆𝑓𝑛)

= ∑ 𝑑

2

𝑛

𝑖=1

(𝑣

0

)𝑑

2

(𝑣

𝑖

) + ∑ 𝑑

2

𝑛

𝑖=1

(𝑣

0

)𝑑

2

(𝑢

𝑖

) + ∑ 𝑑

2

(𝑣

0

)

𝑛

𝑖=1

𝑑

2

(𝑤

𝑖

) +

∑ 𝑑

2

(𝑣

𝑖

)

𝑣𝑖,𝑣𝑖+1

𝑑

2

(𝑣

𝑖+1

) + ∑ 𝑑

2

(𝑣

𝑖

)

𝑛

𝑖=1

𝑑

2

(𝑢

𝑖

)

= 0 + 0 + 0 + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

( 3𝑛 − 4) ( 3𝑛 − 4) + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

( 3𝑛 − 4) ( 3𝑛 − 2) = 𝑛(3𝑛−4)

2

+ 𝑛( 3𝑛 − 4)( 3𝑛 − 2)

= 𝑛 ( 3𝑛 − 4)[ 3𝑛 − 4 + 3𝑛 − 2]

= 𝑛 ( 3𝑛 − 4 ) ( 6𝑛 − 6) = 18𝑛

3

− 18𝑛

2

− 24𝑛

2

+ 24𝑛 = 6𝑛 ( 3𝑛

2

− 7𝑛 + 4)

Therefore, L𝑀

2

(𝑆𝑓

𝑛

) = 6𝑛( 3𝑛

2

− 7𝑛 + 4). ∎ 3) From definition of L𝑀

3

( 𝐺) and Lemma 2.9, we have,

𝐿𝑀

3

(𝑆𝑓

𝑛

) = ∑ 𝑑(𝑣)𝑑

2

(𝑣).

𝑣∈𝑉(𝑆𝑓𝑛)

= 𝑑(𝑣

0

)𝑑

2

(𝑣

0

) + ∑ 𝑑(𝑣

𝑖

)𝑑

2

(𝑣

𝑖

) + ∑ 𝑑(𝑢

𝑖

)𝑑

2

(𝑢

𝑖

) + ∑ 𝑑(𝑤

𝑖

)𝑑

2

(𝑤

𝑖

)

𝑛

𝑖=1 𝑛

𝑖=1 𝑛

𝑖=1

= 0 + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

4 ( 3𝑛 − 4) + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

2 ( 3𝑛 − 2) + ∑

𝑛𝑖=1

1 (3𝑛 − 1) = 4𝑛( 3𝑛 − 4) + 2𝑛 ( 3𝑛 − 2) + 𝑛 (3𝑛 − 1)

= 12𝑛

2

− 16𝑛 + 6𝑛

2

− 4𝑛 + 3𝑛

2

− 𝑛 = 21𝑛

2

− 21𝑛

Therefore 𝐿𝑀

3

(𝑆𝑓

𝑛

) = 21𝑛( 𝑛 − 1). ∎

(11)

REFERENCES

1. A. R. Ashrafi, T. Doslic and A. Hamzeh, The Zagreb coindices of graph operations, Discrete Appl. Math., 158, 1571-1578 (2010).

2. B. Borovicanin, K. C. Das, B. Furtula, and I. Gutman, Bounds for Zagreb indices, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 78(1), 17-100 (2017).

3. K. C. Das and I. Gutman, Some properties of the second Zagreb index, MATCH Commun.

Math. Comput. Chem., 52, 103-112 (2004).

4. M. Eliasi, A. Iranmanesh and I. Gutman, Multiplicative versions of first Zagreb index, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 68, 217-230 (2012).

5. I. Gutman, Multiplicative Zagreb indices of trees, Bull. Soc. Math. Banja. Luka., 18, 17- 23 (2011).

6. I. Gutman, B. Ruscic, N. Trinajstic and C. F. Wilcox, Graph theory and molecular orbitals, XII. Acyclic polyenes, J. Chem. Phys., 62, 3399-3405 (1975).

7. I. Gutman and N. Trinajstic, Graph theory and molecular orbitals. Total -electron energy of Alternant hydrocarbons, Chem. Phys. Lett., 17, 535-538 (1972).

8. I. Gutman, B. Furtula, Z. K. Vukicevic and G. Popivoda, On Zagreb indices and coindices, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 74, 5-16 (2015).

9. F. Harary, Graph theory, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Mass. Menlo Park, Calif. London,(1969).

10. A. M. Naji, N. D. Soner and I. Gutman, On leap Zagreb indices of graphs, Communi.

Combin. Optim., 2(2), 99-117 (2017).

11. A. M. Naji and N. D. Soner, The first leap Zagreb index of some graph opertations, Int. J.

Appli. Graph Theory, In pess.

12. S. Nikolic, G. Kovacevic, A. Milicevic and N. Trinajstic, The Zagreb indices 30 years after, Croat. Chem. Acta, 76, 113-124 (2003).

13. R. Todeschini and V. Consonni, New local vertex invariants and molecular descriptors based on functions of the vertex degrees, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 64, 359-372 (2010).

14. K. Xu and K. C. Das, Trees, unicyclic, and bicyclic graphs extremal with respect to Multiplicative sum Zagreb index, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 68, 257-272 (2012).

15. K. Xu and H. Hua, A unified approach to extremal multiplicative Zagreb indices for trees, unicyclicand bicyclic graphs, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 68, 241-256 (2012).

16. K. Xu, K. C. Das and K. Tang, On the multiplicative Zagreb coindex of graphs, Opuscula

Math., 33, 197-210 (2013).

References

Related documents

The Chair shall preside at meetings; shall serve as the Workforce Board’s chief spokesperson and signatory; shall appoint committee chairs and committee members subject to these

The Cardiology Enterprise Viewer is a viewing component for cardiology images and reports that can be accessed from IntelliSpace

linear regression model will all yield the same predicted value for that particular weld.

(LOS) Average length of stay of patients in the unit Quality Department: Existing automated data source. 

For a graph G , the first, second, and third leap Zagreb indices are the sum of squares of 2 -distance degree of vertices of G ; the sum of product of 2 -distance degree of

The Leap Zagreb coindices and the Wiener polarity index are examples of less frequently studied topological indices that are based on the number of vertices lying at second and

Unlike the   KV ’s decision concerning the alleged abuse of dominance in Telekomunikacije RS   case, the Crumb group ’s claim concerning the existence of an

The aim of this study was to address this gap by investigating how E2 counters the effects of Cd on haematological, biochemical, and oxidative stress parameters,