Volume 2011, Article ID 705943,12pages doi:10.1155/2011/705943
Research Article
Fixed Point and Common Fixed Point Theorems
for Generalized Weak Contraction Mappings of
Integral Type in Modular Spaces
Chirasak Mongkolkeha and Poom Kumam
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT), Bangmod, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
Correspondence should be addressed to Poom Kumam,[email protected]
Received 11 January 2011; Accepted 19 April 2011
Academic Editor: S. M. Gusein-Zade
Copyrightq2011 C. Mongkolkeha and P. Kumam. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
We prove new fixed point and common fixed point theorems for generalized weak contractive mappings of integral type in modular spaces. Our results extend and generalize the results of A. Razani and R. Moradi2009and M. Beygmohammadi and A. Razani2010.
1. Introduction
LetX, dbe a metric space. A mappingT :X → Xis a contraction if
dTx, Ty≤kdx, y, 1.1
where 0 < k < 1. The Banach Contraction Mapping Principle appeared in explicit form in Banach’s thesis in 19221. For its simplicity and usefulness, it has become a very popular tool in solving existence problems in many branches of mathematical analysis. Banach contraction principle has been extended in many different directions; see2–6. In 1997 Alber and Guerre-Delabriere7introduced the concept of weak contraction in Hilbert spaces, and Rhoades8
has showed that the result by Akber et al. is also valid in complete metric spaces A mapping T :X → Xis said to be weakly contractive if
whereφ : 0,∞ → 0,∞is continuous and nondecreasing function such thatφt 0 if and only ift 0. If one takesφt 1−ktwhere 0 < k < 1, then1.2reduces to1.1. In 2002, Branciari9gave a fixed point result for a single mapping an analogue of Banach’s contraction principle for an integral-type inequality, which is stated as follow.
Theorem 1.1. LetX, dbe a complete metric space,α∈0,1,f :X → Xa mapping such that for eachx, y∈X,
dfx,fy
0
ϕtdt≤α
dx,y
0
ϕtdt, 1.3
whereϕ : → is a Lebesgue integrable which is summable, nonnegative, and for allε > 0,
ε
0ϕtdt >0. Then, f has a unique fixed pointz∈Xsuch that for eachx∈X,limn→ ∞fnxz.
Afterward, many authors extended this work to more general contractive conditions. The works noted in10–12are some examples from this line of research.
The notion of modular spaces, as a generalize of metric spaces, was introduced by Nakano 13 and redefined by Musielak and Orlicz 14. A lot of mathematicians are interested, fixed points of Modular spaces, for example15–22. In 2009, Razani and Moradi
23studied fixed point theorems forρ-compatible maps of integral type in modular spaces. Recently, Beygmohammadi and Razani24proved the existence for mapping defined on a complete modular space satisfying contractive inequality of integral type.
In this paper, we study the existence of fixed point and common fixed point theorems forρ-compatible mapping satisfying a generalize weak contraction of integral type in mod-ular spaces.
First, we start with a brief recollection of basic concepts and facts in modular spaces.
Definition 1.2. Let X be a vector space over or . A functional ρ : X → 0,∞is called
a modular if for arbitrary f and g, elements of X satisfy the following conditions:
1ρf 0 if and only iff0;
2ραf ρffor all scalarαwith|α|1;
3ραf βg≤ρf ρg, wheneverα, β≥0 andαβ1.If we replace3by
4ραf βg≤ αsρf βsρg, forα, β ≥ 0,αsβs 1 with an s ∈0,1, then the
modularρis called s-convex modular, and ifs1,ρis called convex modular.
Ifρis modular inX, then the set defined by
Xρ
x∈X:ρλx−→0 asλ−→0 1.4
is called a modular space.Xρis a vector subspace ofX.
Definition 1.3. A modular ρ is said to satisfy theΔ2-condition ifρ2fn → 0 as n → ∞,
wheneverρfn → 0 asn → ∞.
Definition 1.4. Let Xρbe a modular space. Then,
1the sequencefnn∈inXρis said to beρ-convergent tof∈Xρifρfn−f → 0, as
2the sequencefnn∈inXρis said to beρ-Cauchy ifρfn−fm → 0, asn, m → ∞,
3a subsetCofXρis said to beρ-closed if theρ-limit of aρ-convergent sequence ofC
always belong toC,
4a subset C of Xρ is said to be ρ-complete if any ρ-Cauchy sequence in C is ρ
-convergent sequence and its is inC,
5a subsetCofXρis said to beρ-bounded ifδρC sup{ρf−g;f, g∈C}<∞.
Definition 1.5. Let C be a subset of Xρ and T : C → Can arbitrary mapping.T is called
aρ-contraction if for eachf, g∈Xρthere existsk <1 such that
ρTf−Tg≤kρf−g. 1.5
Definition 1.6. LetXρbe a modular space, whereρsatisfies theΔ2-condition. Two
self-map-pingsT and f ofXρare calledρ-compatible ifρTfxn −fTxn → 0 asn → ∞, whenever
{xn}n∈is a sequence inXρsuch thatfxn → zandTxn → zfor some pointz∈Xρ.
2. A Common Fixed Point Theorem for
ρ
-Compatible Generalized
Weak Contraction Maps of Integral Type
Theorem 2.1. LetXρbe aρ-completemodular space, whereρsatisfies theΔ2-condition. Letc, l∈ ,c > landT, f:X
ρ → Xρare twoρ-compatiblemappings such thatTXρ⊆fXρand
ρcT x−T y
0
ϕtdt≤
ρlf x−f y
0
ϕtdt−φ
ρlf x−f y
0
ϕtdt , 2.1
for all x, y ∈ Xρ, where ϕ : 0,∞ → 0,∞ is a Lebesgue integrable which is summable,
nonnegative, and for allε > 0, 0εϕtdt > 0 andφ : 0,∞ → 0,∞is lower semicontinuous function withφt> 0 for allt > 0 andφt 0 if and only ift0. If one ofT orfis continuous, then there exists a unique common fixed point ofT andf.
Proof. Letx ∈ Xρand generate inductively the sequence{Txn}n∈ as follow:Txn fxn1.
First, we prove that the sequence{ρcTxn−Txn−1}converges to 0. Since,
ρcT xn−T xn−1
0
ϕtdt≤
ρlf xn−f xn−1
0
ϕtdt−φ
ρlf xn−f xn−1
0
ϕtdt
≤
ρlf xn−f xn−1
0
ϕtdt
≤
ρlT xn−1−T xn−2
0
ϕtdt
<
ρcT xn−1−T xn−2
0
ϕtdt.
This means that the sequence {0ρcT xn−T xn−1} is decreasing and bounded below. Hence, there existsr ≥0 such that
lim
n→ ∞
ρcT xn−T xn−1
0
ϕtdtr. 2.3
Ifr >0, then limn→ ∞
ρcT xn−T xn−1
0 ϕtdtr >0. Takingn → ∞in the inequality2.2which
is a contradiction, thusr0. This implies that
ρcTxn−Txn−1−→0 asn−→ ∞. 2.4
Next, we prove that the sequence{Txn}n∈isρ-Cauchy. Suppose{cTxn}n∈is notρ
-Cauchy, then there existsε > 0 and sequence of integers{mk},{nk}withmk > nk ≥ksuch
that
ρcTxmk−Txnk≥ε fork1,2,3, . . . 2.5
We can assume that
ρcTxmk−1−Txnk< ε. 2.6
Letmkbe the smallest number exceedingnkfor which2.5holds, and
θk
m∈ | ∃nk∈; ρcTxm−Txnk≥ε, m > nk≥k
. 2.7
Sinceθk ⊂ and clearlyθk/∅, by well ordering principle, the minimum element ofθk is
denoted bymkand obviously2.6holds. Now, letα∈ be such thatl/c1/α1, then we
get
ε
0
ϕtdt≤
ρcT xmk−T xnk
0
ϕtdt
≤
ρlf x
mk−f xnk
0
ϕtdt−φ
ρlf xmk−f xnk
0
ϕtdt
≤
ρlf xmk−f xnk
0
ϕtdt
≤
ρlT x
mk−1−T xnk−1
0
ϕtdt,
ρlTxmk−1−Txnk−1 ρlTxmk−1−TxnkTxnk −Txnk−1
ρ
l
ccTxmk−1−Txnk 1
ααlTxnk −Txnk−1
≤ρcTxmk−1−Txnk ραlTxnk −Txnk−1
< εραlTxnk−Txnk−1.
2.9
Using theΔ2-conditionand2.4, we obtain
lim
n→ ∞ραlTxnk −Txnk−1 0. 2.10
It follows that
lim
k→ ∞
ρlT x
mk−1−T xnk−1
0
ϕtdt <
ε
0
ϕtdt. 2.11
From2.8and2.11, we also have
ε
0
ϕtdt≤
ρlT x
mk−1−T xnk−1
0
ϕtdt
<
ε
0
ϕtdt,
2.12
which is a contradiction. Hence,{cTxn}n∈isρ-Cauchyand by theΔ2-condition,{Txn}n∈
isρ-Cauchy. SinceXρisρ-complete, there exists a pointu∈Xρsuch thatρTxn−u → 0 as
n → ∞. IfT is continuous, thenT2x
n → TuandTfxn → Tuasn → ∞. SinceρcfTxn−
Tfxn → 0 asn → ∞, byρ-compatible,fTxn → Tuasn → ∞. Next, we prove thatuis
a unique fixed point ofT. Indeed,
ρcT2xn−T xn
0
ϕtdt
ρcTT xn−T xn
0
ϕtdt
≤
ρlf T xn−f xn
0
ϕtdt−φ
ρlf T xn−f xn
0
ϕtdt
≤
ρlf T xn−f xn
0
ϕtdt.
2.13
Takingn → ∞in the inequality2.13, we have
ρcT u−u
0
ϕtdt≤
ρlT u−u
0
which implies thatρcTu−u 0 andTu u. SinceTXρ ⊆fXρ, there existsu1 such
thatuTufu1. The inequality,
ρcT2xn−T u1
0
ϕtdt≤
ρlf T xn−f u1
0
ϕtdt−φ
ρlf T xn−f u1
0
ϕtdt
≤
ρlf T xn−f u1
0
ϕtdt
2.15
asn → ∞, yields
ρcT u−T u1
0
ϕtdt≤
ρlT u−f u1
0
ϕtdt 2.16
and, thus,
ρcu−T u1
0
ϕtdt≤
ρlu−f u1
0
ϕtdt
≤
ρlu−u
0
ϕtdt
0,
2.17
which implies that,uTu1 fu1and alsofu fTu1 Tfu1 Tu usee25. Hence,
fuTu u. Suppose that there existsw ∈Xρsuch thatw Tw fwandw /u, we have
ρcw−u
0 ϕtdt >0 and
ρcw−u
0
ϕtdt
ρcT w−T u
0
ϕtdt
≤
ρlf w−f u
0
ϕtdt−φ
ρlf w−f u
0
ϕtdt
<
ρlf w−f u
0
ϕtdt
<
ρcw−u
0
ϕtdt,
2.18
which is a contradiction. Hence,uwand the proof is complete.
Corollary 2.2see23. LetXρbe aρ-completemodular space, whereρsatisfies theΔ2-condition.
Supposec, l ∈ ,c > landT, h :Xρ → Xρare twoρ-compatiblemappings such thatTXρ ⊆
hXρand
ρcT x−T y
0
ϕtdt≤k
ρlhx−hy
0
ϕtdt, 2.19
for somek∈0,1, whereϕ: → is a Lebesgue integrable which is summable, nonnegative, and for allε >0,0εϕtdt >0. If one ofhorTis continuous, then there exists a unique common fixed point ofhandT.
Corollary 2.3see23. LetXρbe aρ-completemodular space, whereρsatisfies theΔ2-condition.
Supposec, l ∈ ,c > landT, h :Xρ → Xρare twoρ-compatiblemappings such thatTXρ ⊆
hXρand
ρcT x−T y
0
ϕtdt≤ψ
ρlhx−hy
0
ϕtdt , 2.20
whereϕ : → is a Lebesgue integrable which is summable, nonnegative, and for allε > 0,
ε
0ϕtdt >0 andψ : → is a nondecreasing and right continuous function withψt< tfor
allt >0. If one ofhorTis continuous, then there exists a unique common fixed point ofhandT.
3. A Fixed Point Theorem for Generalized Weak Contraction
Mapping of Integral Type
Theorem 3.1. LetXρbe aρ-completemodular space, whereρsatisfies theΔ2-condition. Letc, l∈ ,c > landT :X
ρ → Xρbe a mapping such that for eachx, y∈Xρ,
ρcT x−T y
0
ϕtdt≤
ρlx−y
0
ϕtdt−φ
ρlx−y
0
ϕtdt , 3.1
whereϕ:0,∞ → 0,∞is a Lebesgue integrable which is summable, nonnegative, and for allε >0,
ε
0ϕtdt >0 andφ:0,∞ → 0,∞is lower semicontinuous function withφt>0 for allt >0
andφt 0 if and only ift0. Then,T has a unique fixed point.
Proof. First, we prove that the sequence{ρcTnx−Tn−1x}converges to 0. Since,
ρcTnx−Tn−1x
0
ϕtdt≤
ρlTn−1x−Tn−2x
0
ϕtdt−φ
ρlTn−1x−Tn−2x
0
ϕtdt
≤
ρlTn−1x−Tn−2x
0
ϕtdt
<
ρcTn−1x−Tn−2x
0
ϕtdt,
it follows that the sequence{0ρcTnx−Tn−1x}is decreasing and bounded below. Hence, there existsr ≥0 such that
lim
n→ ∞
ρcTnx−Tn−1x
0
ϕtdtr. 3.3
Ifr >0, then limn→ ∞
ρcTnx−Tn−1x
0 ϕtdtr >0, takingn → ∞in the inequality3.2which
is a contradiction, thusr0. So, we have
ρcTnx−Tn−1x−→0 as n−→ ∞. 3.4
Next, we prove that the sequence {Tnx}
n∈ isρ-Cauchy. Suppose {cT
nx}
n∈ is notρ
-Cauchy, there existsε >0 and sequence of integers{mk},{nk}withmk> nk≥ksuch that
ρcTmkx−Tnkx≥ε fork1,2,3, . . . . 3.5
We can assume that
ρcTmk−1x−Tnkx< ε. 3.6
Letmkbe the smallest number exceedingnkfor which3.5holds, and
θk
m∈ | ∃nk∈; ρcT
mx−Tnkx≥ε, m > n
k≥k
. 3.7
Sinceθk ⊂ and clearlyθk/∅, by well ordering principle, the minimum element ofθk is
denoted bymkand obviously3.6holds. Now, letα∈ be such thatl/c1/α1, then we
get
ε
0
ϕtdt≤
ρcTmkx−Tnkx
0
ϕtdt
≤
ρlTmk−1x−Tnk−1x
0
ϕtdt−φ
ρlTmk−1x−Tnk−1x
0
ϕtdt
≤
ρlTmk−1x−Tnk−1x
0
ϕtdt,
, 3.8
ρlTmk−1x−Tnk−1xρlTmk−1x−TnkxTnkx−Tnk−1x
ρ
l cc
Tmk−1x−Tnkx 1 ααl
Tnkx−Tnk−1x
≤ρcTmk−1x−TnkxραlTnkx−Tnk−1x
< εραlTnkx−Tnk−1x.
Using theΔ2-conditionand3.4, we obtain
lim
k→ ∞ρ
αlTnkx−Tnk−1x0, 3.10
lim
k→ ∞
ρlTmk−1x−Tnk−1x
0 ϕtdt <
ε
0ϕtdt. 3.11
From3.8and3.11, we have
ε
0
ϕtdt≤
ρlTmk−1x−Tnk−1x
0
ϕtdt
<
ε
0
ϕtdt,
3.12
which is a contradiction. Hence,{cTnx}n∈ isρ-Cauchy and again by theΔ2-condition,
{Tnx}
n∈isρ-Cauchy. SinceXρisρ-complete, there exists a pointu∈Xρsuch thatρT
nx−
u → 0 asn → ∞. Next, we prove thatuis a unique fixed point ofT. Indeed,
ρc
2u−Tu
ρc
2
u−Tn1xTn1x−Tu
≤ρcu−Tn1xρcTn1x−Tu,
3.13
ρcTn1x−T u
0
ϕtdt≤
ρlTnx−u
0
ϕtdt−φ
ρlTnx−u
0
ϕtdt
≤
ρlTnx−u
0
ϕtdt.
3.14
SinceρTnx−u → 0 asn → ∞, we obtain
lim
n→ ∞
ρcTn1x−T u
0
ϕtdt≤0, 3.15
which implies that
ρcTn1x−Tu−→0 asn−→ ∞. 3.16
So, we have
Thusρc/2u−Tu 0 andTuu. Suppose that there existsw∈Xρsuch thatTwwand
w /u, we have0ρcw−uϕtdt >0 and
ρcw−u
0
ϕtdt
ρcT w−T u
0
ϕtdt
≤
ρlw−u
0
ϕtdt−φ
ρlw−u
0
ϕtdt
<
ρlw−u
0
ϕtdt
<
ρcw−u
0
ϕtdt,
3.18
which is a contradiction. Hence,uwand the proof is complete.
Corollary 3.2. LetXρbe aρ-completemodular space, whereρsatisfies theΔ2-condition. Letf :
Xρ → Xρbe a mapping such that there exists anλ ∈0,1andc, l∈ wherel < cand for each
x, y∈Xρ,
ρcf x−f y
0
ϕtdt≤λ
ρlx−y
0
ϕtdt 3.19
whereϕ:0,∞ → 0,∞is a Lebesgue integrable which is summable, nonnegative, and for allε >0,
ε
oϕtdt > o. Then,T has a unique fixed point inXρ.
Corollary 3.3see24. LetXρbe aρ-completemodular space whereρsatisfies theΔ2-condition.
Assume thatψ: → 0,∞is an increasing and upper semicontinuous function satisfyingψt< t
for allt >0. Letϕ:0,∞ → 0,∞be a Lebesgue integrable which is summable, nonnegative, and for allε > 0,0εϕtdt > 0 and letf :Xρ → Xρbe a mapping such that there arec, l ∈ where
l < c,
ρcT x−T y
0
ϕtdt≤ψ
ρlx−y
0
ϕtdt , 3.20
for eachx, y∈Xρ. Then,T has a unique fixed point inXρ.
Acknowledgments
References
1 S. Banach, “Sur les op´erations dans les ensembles abstraits et leur application aux ´equations int´egrales,” Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 3, pp. 133–181, 1922.
2 G. Jungck, “Compatible mappings and common fixed points,” International Journal of Mathematics and
Mathematical Sciences, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 771–779, 1986.
3 G. Jungck, “Common fixed points for noncontinuous nonself maps on nonmetric spaces,” Far East
Journal of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 199–215, 1996.
4 G. Jungck and B. E. Rhoades, “Fixed points for set valued functions without continuity,” Indian Journal
of Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 227–238, 1998.
5 W. Sintunavarat and P. Kumam, “Coincidence and common fixed points for hybrid strict contractions without the weakly commuting condition,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 1877–1881, 2009.
6 W. Sintunavarat and P. Kumam, “Weak condition for generalized multi-valuedf, α, β-weak contrac-tion mappings,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 460–465, 2011.
7 Y. I. Alber and S. Guerre-Delabriere, “Principle of weakly contractive maps in Hilbert spaces,” in New
Results in Operator Theory and Its Applications, vol. 98 of Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, pp.
7–22, Birkh¨auser, Basel, Switzerland, 1997.
8 B. E. Rhoades, “Some theorems on weakly contractive maps,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods &
Applications, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 2683–2693, 2001.
9 A. Branciari, “A fixed point theorem for mappings satisfying a general contractive condition of integral type,” International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 531– 536, 2002.
10 B. E. Rhoades, “Two fixed-point theorems for mappings satisfying a general contractive condition of integral type,” International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, vol. 2003, no. 63, pp. 4007– 4013, 2003.
11 W. Sintunavart and P. Kumam, “Gregus-type common fixed point theorems for tangential multival-ued mappings of integral type in metric spaces,” International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical
Sciences, vol. 2011, Article ID 923458, 12 pages, 2011.
12 W. Sintunavarat and P. Kumam, “Gregus type fixed points for a tangential multi-valued mappings satisfying contractive conditions of integral type,” Journal of Inequalities and Applications. In Press.
13 H. Nakano, Modulared Semi-Ordered Linear Spaces, Tokyo Mathematical Book Series, Maruzen Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan, 1950.
14 J. Musielak and W. Orlicz, “On modular spaces,” Studia Mathematica, vol. 18, pp. 49–65, 1959.
15 T. Dominguez Benavides, M. A. Khamsi, and S. Samadi, “Uniformly Lipschitzian mappings in modular function spaces,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 267– 278, 2001.
16 M. A. Khamsi, “Quasicontraction mappings in modular spaces withoutΔ2-condition,” Fixed Point
Theory and Applications, vol. 2008, Article ID 916187, 6 pages, 2008.
17 M. A. Khamsi, W. M. Kozłowski, and S. Reich, “Fixed point theory in modular function spaces,”
Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 935–953, 1990.
18 P. Kumam, “On nonsquare and Jordan-von Neumann constants of modular spaces,” Southeast Asian
Bulletin of Mathematics, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 69–77, 2006.
19 P. Kumam, “On uniform Opial condition, uniform Kadec-Klee property in modular spaces and application to fixed point theory,” Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 377–385, 2005.
20 P. Kumam, “Fixed point theorems for nonexpansive mappings in modular spaces,” Archivum
Mathe-maticum, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 345–353, 2004.
21 P. Kumam, “Some geometrical properties and fixed point theorems in modular spaces,” in
Interna-tional Conference on Fixed Point Theory and Applications, pp. 173–188, Yokohama Publishers, Yokohama,
Japan, 2004.
22 A. Razani, E. Nabizadeh, M. B. Mohamadi, and S. H. Pour, “Fixed points of nonlinear and asymptotic contractions in the modular space,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2007, Article ID 40575, 10 pages, 2007.
23 A. Razani and R. Moradi, “Common fixed point theorems of integral type in modular spaces,” Bulletin
24 M. Beygmohammadi and A. Razani, “Two fixed-point theorems for mappings satisfying a general contractive condition of integral type in the modular space,” International Journal of Mathematics and
Mathematical Sciences, vol. 2010, Article ID 317107, 10 pages, 2010.
Submit your manuscripts at
http://www.hindawi.com
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Mathematics
Journal ofHindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com
Differential Equations International Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex Analysis
Journal ofHindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Optimization
Journal ofHindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Combinatorics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied Analysis
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
The Scientific
World Journal
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Discrete Mathematics
Journal ofHindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014