• No results found

PFMEA Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis. James Davis, General Dynamics

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "PFMEA Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis. James Davis, General Dynamics"

Copied!
34
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

PFMEA

Process Failure Mode and Effects

Analysis

(2)

Purpose

The purpose of this presentation is to

share the benefits of a detailed Process

Flow Diagram, conducted during a

Process Failure Mode and Effects

Analysis, that will ensure product

quality in the manufacturing/assembly

process.

(3)
(4)

Definition of FMEA

A FMEA is an

analytical

tool that uses a

disciplined technique

to identify and help

eliminate product and process potential

failure modes.

o

By ID of potential failures

o

Assessing the risks caused by failure modes and

Identify corrective actions

o

Prioritizing corrective actions

o

Carry out corrective actions

(5)

Most COMMON Types of FMEA's

Design (Potential) Failure Modes and

Effects Analysis-DFMEA

Focus is on potential

design- related failures

and their causes.

Process (Potential) Failures Modes and

Effects Analysis-PFMEA

Focuses is on potential process failures and

their causes.

(6)

Value of FMEA's

z

Aids in improving designs for products and

process

ƒ Increased safety

ƒ Enhances Customer Satisfaction

o

Better Quality

o

Higher Reliability

z

Contributes to cost savings

ƒ Decreases warranty costs

(7)

PFMEA's

z

Focus is on potential

process –related

failures

and their causes.

ƒMain drive is to understand the process through the

identification of as many potential failures

as possible.

o

e.g. Incorrect material used

z

PFMEA typically assumes that the design

is sound.

z

Development of Recommended Actions is

targeted at eliminating the

Root Cause

of

the potential failures.

(8)

PFMEA

Three Parts:

z

Process Flow Diagram (PFD)

z

Process Failure Mode and Effects

Analysis (PFMEA)

(9)

Product Definition:

Key Product Characteristics, DFMEA

Process Definition:

Process Flow Diagram (PFD),

Failure Mode Analysis:

PFMEA

Control Strategy:

Control Plan,

Error proofing

Customer Requirements:

Manufacturing:

Work Instructions & Process Monitoring

Information Flow

SOR, Vehicle Tech Specs,

System Technical Specs

(10)

DFMEA/PFMEA Information

Interrelationships

DFMEA

Design FMEA

Process Flow

Diagram

PFMEA

Process FMEA

Boundary (Block)

Diagram, P- Diagram,

Etc.

Design Verification

Plan & Report

(DVP&R)

Process Control

Plan

(11)

Process Flow Diagrams

z

The Process Flow

Diagram provides a

logical (visual)

depiction of the

process that is being

analyzed.

(12)

z

The SAE/AIAG PFMEA guidelines describe two

methods of defining process functions.

Either or both may be used.

z

Process Functions may be described in terms of:

ƒ

The

product features/characteristics

that are

created

or

ƒ

The

process actions

that are performed

z

Process functions should be identified in detail

as necessary to provide information for the

PFMEA to develop effective Process Controls

(13)

z

Consider a simple operation to drill a hole in a

metal part

z

The product

characteristics

& requirements are:

ƒ

Hole size

: 4.00 mm +/- 0.13

ƒ

Hole Location

:

X = 28.0 mm +/- 0.2

Y = 15.0 mm +/- 0.2

ƒ

Perpendicular to surface

,

no burrs

, etc.

z

The process operation must create these

product characteristics and meet the

Process Function / Requirement

X

Y

(14)

z

To drill the correct hole size in the

specified location, the process must:

ƒ Position and hold the part

ƒ Align the part fixturing

with the drill position

ƒ Assure the correct drill

bit size is used

ƒ Set and control drill speed

ƒ Anticipate tool wear and

schedule preventive maintenance

z

If the Function/Requirement is defined in

the PFMEA as “Drill Hole” could any of

these be missed?

(15)

Process Flow Diagram (PFD)

z

Process Flow Diagram is the foundation

ƒ The process must be defined step by step, including

interfaces

ƒ The PFD provides the structure to document what product

characteristics and requirements (OUTPUTS) are affected

by a given operation and how these characteristics and

sources of variation are controlled (INPUTS)

ƒ PFD is a graphical representation of every possible path a

part can take through the anticipated manufacturing

process

ƒ A well defined PFD establishes the foundation for the

PFMEA

z

Helps in developing equipment specifications.

ƒ How will the process control non-conforming material?

ƒ How and when will inspections be performed, what is

required?

(16)

Process Flow Diagram (PFD)

z

Hidden Factories:

ƒ Interfacing Processes

Quality Audits

Product/tooling Changeovers

Rework Processes

Part Ident./Labeling

Alternative Processes

Teardown

Scrap

Gauging Stations

Part Buffers

Reject Handling

Part Movement

ƒ Interface process issues affect quality performance

o

Rework and scrap parts bypass process controls

o

Mixed parts in the manufacturing process at changeovers

z

Need for common systems

ƒ Part of the overall Quality Strategy must include

o

Common content, common format, common approach

ƒ Quality strategy must extend to suppliers

(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)

PFD Feeds PFMEA

Identify the Function(s)

z

Function is a description of what the

Process does to meet the requirements

¾Related to process specification and product

characteristics

¾Comes from the PFD operation description column

z

Functions can be described as:

¾ Do this operation…

¾ To this part or material…

(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)

Sources and Types of Manufacturing Variation

Source of Variation

Types of Variation

Typical Process Controls

Operator

Operator Skill,

Ergonomic Factors

Training, instructions, visual aids, feedback

layout, motion analysis, human factors

Component /

Material

Incoming raw material, purchased

parts, previous operations

Supplier management, internal controls, error

proofing

Equipment /

Machine

Machine capability, adjustment,

wear over time

Equipment specifications, closed-loop

machine controls, preventive maintenance

Environment

Temperature, humidity, dust, noise

Climate control, air filtration, clean room,

sound insulation

Methods & Systems

Sequence, procedure, layout

Industrial Engineering techniques,

Lean Flow analysis

Set Up

(for stable

processes)

Initial set up or adjustment

Process specification, first / last piece check,

automated controls

Tool

Wear over time, breakage,

tool-to-tool differences

Predictive maintenance, detection error-

proofing, tooling specifications

Maintenance

Repair, replacement, reassembly,

adjustment

Instructions, error-proofing, machine

qualification, production trial run

(25)

z

PCP will be based on the previous

activities in PFD and PFMEA.

z

Review the PFMEA information

developed & supplied and use to identify:

ƒ Specific controls that may be needed due to the

information added

ƒ Identify which controls are Product or Process

o

Note any Special Characteristics

o

Identify evaluation methods, frequency and Control

Methods

o

Note Reaction Plans (particularly related to NC parts)

(26)

Process Control Plan Example

Part/ Process Number Process Name / Operation Description Machine, Device, Jig, Tools for Mfg. Characteristics Special Char. Class. Methods Reaction Plan No. Product Process

Product / Process Specification / Tolerance Evaluation Measurement Technique Sample Control Method Size Frequency

300 Initiate weld sequence /

Perform TIG weld of frame parts. Robotic Arm controller. TIG welders. Weld beads per design specification.

Tube welds meet pull test with failure in parent material.

Pull test using test fixture 20-1.

1 pc. Per shift. Hydraulic pull test instruction TI21-01 Process monitoring form PMF-20-01 Quarantine material since last good pull test. Good welds, no visible defects.

yes Weld appearance meets visual standard. Operator evaluation to Visual Std TB20-VS1 100% Each piece.

Visual inspection OWI #20-01.

Remove part and send to repair. Weld voltage yes 24 Volts AC

+/- 2.0 volts Machine Control 100% Each weld cycle. Closed-loop machine control.

Scrap part & Re-start welder. Weld voltage yes 24 Volts AC

+/- 2.0 volts Visual Once each Shift start or change-over or maint. event.

Set-up OWI #20-02 & Form PMF-20-02 Periodic maintenance per PM-WI #20. Scrap current part. Shut down. Notify maintenance .

Inert gas flow rate

yes 5 cubic feet / min. +/- 0.5 cfm

Visual twice Per shift. Operator cleans gas cup twice per shift PM-WI-20. Process monitoring form PMF-20-01 Notify maintenance .

Inert gas flow rate

yes 5 cubic feet / min. +/- 0.5 cfm Visual of verification of Flow Meter Once each Shift start or change-over or

Set-up OWI #20-02 & Form PMF-20-02. Equipment Calibration Procedure Quarantine material since last good pull

Form 818-1 (Rev 12Apr02)

CONTROL PLAN

Control Plan No:

Part Number/Latest Change Level Key Contact/Phone Date (Orig.) Date (Rev.) Customer Part Number Core

Team

Customer Engineering Approval/Date (If Req'd.) Part Name/Description Supplier/Plant Approval/Date Customer Quality Approval/Date (If Req'd.) Supplier/Plant Supplier Code Other Approval/Date (If Req'd.) Other Approval/Date (If Req'd.)

(27)

Process Control Plan Example

Initiate weld sequence / Confirm Wire feed rate Initiate weld sequence / Confirm Weld voltage Initiate weld sequence / Perform TIG weld of frame parts.

Initiate weld sequence / Confirm Inert Gas flow rate

Scrap part & Re-start welder Closed-loop machine control. Each weld cycle. 100% Machine Control 300 mm / minute +/- 10 mm / min. yes Weld wire feed rate Scrap part & Re-start welder Closed-loop machine control. Each weld cycle. 100% Machine Control 24 Volts AC +/- 2.0 volts yes Weld voltage Notify maintenan ce.

Operator cleans gas cup twice per shift PM-WI-2500. Process monitoring form PMF-20-10 Per shift. twice Visual 5 cubic feet / min.

+/- 0.5 cfm yes

Inert gas flow rate

Remove part and send to repair.

Visual inspection OWI #20-010. Each piece. 100% Operator evaluation to Visual Std TB20-VS1. Weld appearance meets visual standard. yes Good welds, no visible defects. Scrap current

Set-up OWI #20-020 &

Shift start 100% Operator 300 mm / minute yes Weld wire Quarantine material since last good pull test. Notify maintenan ce.

Set-up OWI #20-02 & Form PM-00-02. Equipment Calibration Procedure #368 Shift start or change-over or maint. event Once each Visual verification of Flow Meter 5 cubic feet / min.

+/- 0.5 cfm yes

Inert gas flow rate Scrap current part. Shut down. Notify maintenanc e.

Set-up OWI #20-02 & Form PM-20-02 Periodic maintenance per PM-WI #20. Shift start or change-over or maint. event Once each Visual 24 Volts AC +/- 2.0 volts yes Weld voltage Quarantine material since last good pull test.

Hydraulic pull test instruction TI41-01 Process monitoring form PM-20-010 Per shift. 1 pc. Pull test using test fixture 20-1. Tube welds meet

pull test with failure in parent material. Weld beads per

design specification. Robotic Arm TIG welders and controllers. 300. . Robotic Arm TIG welders Initiate weld sequence /

Close and latch curtain 300 Frequency Size Reaction Plan Control Method Sample Evaluation Measurement Technique Product / Process Specification / Tolerance Process Product No. Methods Special Char. Class. Characteristics Machine, Device, Jig, Tools for Mfg. Process Name / Operation Description Part/ Process Number

(28)

Case Studies – Supplier A

z

Not ISO Certified, Primarily Defense business base

z

Sole Source - Unique Technology

z

No Process Flow

ƒ

Operator work instruction for 100 piece component

o

20 process steps on a single piece of paper (included machining)

o

Building the component relied on Tribal Knowledge

z

Diagramming the Process Flow

ƒ

20 steps turned into 951 steps to produce the component

ƒ

22 manufacturing related issues (from DFMEA) were

incorporated in the PFD/PFMEA

z

Supplier A used PFD - FMEA to

ƒ

Develop work instructions

ƒ

Determine the requirement to developed training programs

for assemblers / machinists, QC personnel

(29)

Case Studies – Supplier B

z

ISO Certified, Primarily Defense business base

z

Sole Source - Unique Design

z

“Fair” Documented Process Flow

ƒ

Relied on a combination of operator knowing what should

be done next with operator work instructions.

o

However it did allow for repeatable assembly of component with

skilled employee

z

Diagramming the Process Flow

ƒ

270 step PFD became 1,170 steps

o

FMEA analysis determined: work instructions that needed

improvement and new work instructions were required

z

Supplier B used PFD- FMEA to

(30)

Case Studies – Supplier C

z

ISO Certified, Defense/Civil business base

z

Well Documented Process Flow

ƒ

Operator work instructions allowed for repeatable assembly

ƒ

Error Proofing allows for assembly with “average”

employees

z

Diagramming the Process Flow

ƒ

263 step PFD became 268 steps

ƒ

32 manufacturing related issues (from DFMEA) were

incorporated in the PFD/PFMEA

o

FMEA analysis determined: work instructions that needed

improvement and new work instructions were required

z

Supplier C used PFD- FMEA to

(31)

Case Studies – Supplier D

z

ISO Certified, Aerospace business base

z

Very Small Company

ƒ

2 Master Assemblers (1 of which was the Assembly & Test

Manager)

z

Unique Technology

z

“Fair” Documented Process Flow

ƒ

Relied on a combination of operator knowing what should be done next

with broad operator work instructions.

o

However it did allow for repeatable assembly of component with highly

skilled employee

z

Diagramming the Process Flow

ƒ

5 page PFD became 22 pages

ƒ

FMEA analysis determined: work instructions needed improvement

to allow for production of more than 1 component at a time

z

Supplier D used PFD - FMEA to

ƒ

Develop work instructions with boundary photos

ƒ

Recall non-compliant parts

ƒ

Determine the requirement to developed training programs for

assemblers, QC personnel

(32)

Recapping

Process Flow Diagram

“What does the process do?

Control Plan

“What needs to be controlled/monitored?”

“How do we react to problems?”

PFMEA

“What could go wrong?”

“Could we prevent or detect?”

Operator Instructions & Monitoring

“What am I supposed to do?”

“How am I supposed to do it?”

(33)

References

z

AIAG FMEA Fourth Edition June 2008

(34)

Vocabulary

z

AIAG FMEA Fourth Edition Published June 2008

z

SAE FMEA J1739 Published March 2009

z

PFD, Process Flow Diagram

z

PFMEA, Process Failure Modes and Effects

Analysis

References

Related documents