• No results found

Carpel size, grain filling, and morphology determine individual grain weight in wheat

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Carpel size, grain filling, and morphology determine individual grain weight in wheat"

Copied!
16
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

Loading

Figure

Fig. 1. Carpel from a wheat floret (A) and a schematic diagram of grain dry calculated, and termed the initial, rapid, and late GFR
Fig. 2. Relationships between carpel size at anthesis, grain dry matter and water accumulation, and final grain weight
Table 1. Phenotypic correlations of carpel size at anthesis with grain dry matter and water accumulation, and grain dimensions
Table 3. Phenotypic correlations between maximum grain dimensions and grain dry weight accumulation
+5

References

Related documents

• Saunders Cervical Home Traction’s innovative design replicates clinical traction and promotes consistency of treatment. • The Cervical Home Traction’s positioning

Some judges in the High Court and Court of Appeal have been at the forefront in making sure that women are not oppressed, but enjoy their rights guaranteed by the

However Schloezer does say it is the only detailed account on Scriabin’s belief in the magical power of art – his journals and poetry tend to be more concerned with the

Proposition 6 When the economy starts with a higher physical-human capital ratio than that of the stationary solution, the short-run rate of physical capital accumulation is lower

Wind energy generation in 2017 accounted for 539 GW of installed capacity, including almost 20 GW of offshore capacity worldwide, the majority of which comes from China, the

Although the amplitudes of TWS and residual TWS over the basin during wet periods of 2003, late 2007, and 2010 are are somewhat consistent with those of rainfall anomalies ( Fig. 9

In this environment, the Prime Reserve Fund, a well-established money market fund that had exposure to Lehman commercial paper, "broke the buck." Money market fund

original New York order, which it modified, had been properly en- tered at the time under New York law because both parties were then residents in New York, but