• No results found

KIPP Los Angeles College Preparatory

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "KIPP Los Angeles College Preparatory"

Copied!
25
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

KIPP Los Angeles College Preparatory

View Larger Map

Carlos Lanuza, Principal

Principal, KIPP Los Angeles College Preparatory

KIPP Los Angeles College Preparat ory School (KIPP LA Prep) is a high-performing t uit ion-free public chart er middle school locat ed in Boyle Height s. W e serve 470 st udent s in grades five t hrough eight .

KIPP LA Prep is part of t he nat ional KIPP (Know ledge Is Pow er Program) net w ork of schools. W e are operat ed by KIPP LA Schools, a chart er school management organizat ion.

KIPP LA Prep’s mission is t o prepare st udent s w it h t he academic skills, int ellect ual habit s, and charact er t rait s t hat are necessary for success in high school, college, and t he compet it ive w orld beyond. In pursuing t his mission, w e aim t o serve our communit y as a w hole by educat ing st udent s w ho w ill make a difference in our communit y and t he w orld.

KIPP LA Prep is a California Dist inguished School and it is t he t op performing middle school in Los Angeles Unified School Dist rict for t he fourt h consecut ive year.

2810 W hittier Blvd.

Los Angeles, CA 90023

Phone: 323-264-7737 E-mail: clanuza@kippla.org

About Our SchoolAbout Our School

ContactContact

(2)

Data and Access

Every school in California is required by st at e law t o publish a School Account abilit y Report Card (SARC), by February 1 of each year. T he SARC cont ains informat ion about t he condit ion and performance of each California public school.

For more informat ion about SARC requirement s, see t he California Depart ment of Educat ion (CDE) SARC W eb page.

For addit ional informat ion about t he school, parent s and communit y members should cont act t he school principal or t he dist rict office.

DataQuest

Internet Access

Additional Information

Dat aQuest is an online dat a t ool locat ed on t he CDE Dat aQuest W eb page t hat cont ains addit ional informat ion about t his school and comparisons of t he school t o t he dist rict , t he count y, and t he st at e. Specifically, Dat aQuest is a dynamic syst em t hat provides report s for account abilit y (e.g., st at e Academic Performance Index [API], federal Adequat e Y early Progress [AY P]), t est dat a, enrollment , high school graduat es, dropout s, course enrollment s, st affing, and dat a regarding English learners.

Int ernet access is available at public libraries and ot her locat ions t hat are publicly accessible (e.g., t he California St at e Library). Access t o t he Int ernet at libraries and public locat ions is generally provided on a first -come, first -served basis. Ot her use rest rict ions may include t he hours of operat ion, t he lengt h of t ime t hat a w orkst at ion may be used (depending on availabilit y), t he t ypes of soft w are programs available on a w orkst at ion, and t he abilit y t o print document s.

For furt her informat ion regarding t he dat a element s and t erms used in t he SARC see t he 2012-13 Academic Performance Index Report s Informat ion Guide

locat ed on t he CDE API W eb page.

(3)

Last updated: 1/27/2014

Last updated: 1/27/2014

Last updated: 1/27/2014

About This School

Contact Information (School Year 2012-13) Contact Information (School Year 2012-13)

School

School Name KIPP Los Angeles College Preparat ory

St reet 2810 W hit t ier Blvd.

Cit y, St at e, Zip Los Angeles, Ca, 90023

Phone Number 323-264-7737

Principal Carlos Lanuza, Principal

E-mail Address clanuza@kippla.org

Count y-Dist rict - School (CDS) Code

19647330100867

Dist rict

Dist rict Name Los Angeles Unified

Phone Number (213) 241-1000

Web Sit e w w w .lausd.net

Superint endent First Name

John

Superint endent Last Name

Deasy

E-mail Address john.deasy@lausd.net

School Description and Mission Statement (School Year 2012-13) School Description and Mission Statement (School Year 2012-13)

KIPP LA Prep’s mission is t o prepare st udent s w it h t he academic skills, int ellect ual habit s, and charact er t rait s t hat are necessary for success in high school, college, and t he compet it ive w orld beyond. In pursuing t his mission, w e aim t o serve our communit y as a w hole by educat ing st udent s w ho w ill make a difference in our communit y and t he w orld.

Opportunities for Parental Involvement (School Year 2012-13) Opportunities for Parental Involvement (School Year 2012-13)

KIPP LA Prep is commit t ed t o involving parent s in t heir child’s learning. Parent s are encouraged t o at t end

regular w orkshops, parent /t eacher conferences, and family act ivit y night s. At KIPP LA Prep parent s commit t o t w ent y hours of service per school year. Many

parent s help w it h daily act ivit ies, including helping guide t raffic during arrival and dismissal, serving breakfast and lunch, and packing snacks.

(4)

Student Performance

Standardized Testing and Reporting Program

T he St andardized T est ing and Report ing (ST AR) Program consist s of several key component s, including:

California St andards Test s (CSTs), w hich include English-language art s (ELA) and mat hemat ics in grades t w o t hrough eleven; science in grades five, eight , and nine t hrough eleven; and hist ory-social science in grades eight , and nine t hrough eleven.

California Modified Assessment (CMA), an alt ernat e assessment t hat is based on modified achievement st andards in ELA for grades t hree t hrough eleven;

mat hemat ics for grades t hree t hrough seven, Algebra I, and Geomet ry; and science in grades five and eight , and Life Science in grade t en. T he CMA is designed t o assess t hose st udent s w hose disabilit ies preclude t hem from achieving grade-level proficiency on an assessment of t he California cont ent st andards w it h or w it hout accommodat ions.

Alt ernat e Performance Assessment (CAPA), includes ELA and mat hemat ics in grades t w o t hrough eleven, and science for grades five, eight , and t en. T he CAPA is given t o t hose st udent s w it h significant cognit ive disabilit ies w hose disabilit ies prevent t hem from t aking eit her t he CST s w it h accommodat ions or modificat ions or t he CMA w it h accommodat ions.

T he assessment s under t he ST AR Program show how w ell st udent s are doing in relat ion t o t he st at e cont ent st andards. On each of t hese assessment s, st udent scores are report ed as performance levels.

For det ailed informat ion regarding t he ST AR Program result s for each grade and performance level, including t he percent of st udent s not t est ed, see t he CDE ST AR Result s W eb sit e.

Not e: Scores are not show n w hen t he number of st udent s t est ed is t en or less, eit her because t he number of st udent s in t his cat egory is t oo small for st at ist ical accuracy or t o prot ect st udent privacy.

Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for All Students - Three-Year Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for All Students - Three-Year Comparison

Comparison

Subject

Percent of St udent s Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meet ing or exceeding t he st at e st andards)

School Dist rict St at e

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

English-Language Art s 72% 77% 80% 44% 48% 47% 54% 56% 55%

Mat hemat ics 87% 88% 87% 43% 44% 45% 49% 50% 50%

Science 89% 95% 95% 47% 51% 52% 57% 60% 59%

Hist ory-Social Science 100% 95% 96% 37% 39% 40% 48% 49% 49%

English-Language Art s Percent of St udent s Scoring at Proficient or Advanced

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Mat h Percent of St udent s Scoring at Proficient or Advanced

0 20 40 60 80 100

(5)

Last updated: 1/27/2014

Science Percent of St udent s Scoring at Proficient or Advanced

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

0 20 40 60 80 100

Hist ory Percent of St udent s Scoring at Proficient or Advanced

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Standardized Testing and Reporting Results by Student Group – Most Recent Year Standardized Testing and Reporting Results by Student Group – Most Recent Year

Group

Percent of St udent s Scoring at Proficient or Advanced

English-Language Art s Mat hemat ics Science Hist ory-Social Science

All St udent s in t he LEA 47% 45% 52% 40%

All St udent s at t he School 80% 87% 95% 96%

Male 75% 85% 96% 98%

Female 85% 88% 94% 94%

Black or African American N/A N/A N/A N/A

American Indian or Alaska Nat ive N/A N/A N/A N/A

Asian N/A N/A N/A N/A

Filipino N/A N/A N/A N/A

Hispanic or Lat ino 79% 86% 95% 97%

Nat ive Haw aiian or Pacific Islander N/A N/A N/A N/A

W hit e N/A N/A N/A N/A

T w o or More Races N/A N/A N/A N/A

Socioeconomically Disadvant aged 79% 87% 95% 97%

English Learners 38% 73% 83% N/A

St udent s w it h Disabilit ies 32% 57% 88% N/A

St udent s Receiving Migrant Educat ion Services N/A N/A N/A N/A

(6)

Last updated: 1/27/2014

T he California High School Exit Examinat ion (CAHSEE) is primarily used as a graduat ion requirement . How ever, t he grade t en result s of t his exam are also used t o est ablish t he percent ages of st udent s at t hree proficiency levels (not proficient , proficient , or advanced) in ELA and mat hemat ics t o comput e AY P designat ions required by t he federal ESEA, also know n as NCLB. For det ailed informat ion regarding CAHSEE result s, see t he CDE CAHSEE W eb sit e at ht t p://cahsee.cde.ca.gov/.

Not e: Scores are not show n w hen t he number of st udent s t est ed is t en or less, eit her because t he number of st udent s in t his cat egory is t oo small for st at ist ical accuracy or t o prot ect st udent privacy.

California High School Exit Examination Results for All Grade Ten Students – California High School Exit Examination Results for All Grade Ten Students – Three-Year Comparison

Three-Year Comparison

Subject

Percent of St udent s Scoring at Proficient or Advanced

School Dist rict St at e

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

English-Language Art s N/A N/A N/A 48% 45% 49% 59% 56% 57%

Mat hemat ics N/A N/A N/A 46% 50% 54% 56% 58% 60%

English-Language Art s Percent of St udent s Scoring at Proficient or Advanced

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

Mat hemat ics Percent of St udent s Scoring at Proficient or Advanced

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

(7)

Last updated: 1/27/2014

Not e: Scores are not show n w hen t he number of st udent s t est ed is t en or less, eit her because t he number of st udent s in t his cat egory is t oo small for st at ist ical accuracy or t o prot ect st udent privacy.

California High School Exit Examination Grade Ten Results by Student Group California High School Exit Examination Grade Ten Results by Student Group

Group

English-Language Art s Mat hemat ics

Not Proficient Proficient Advanced Not Proficient Proficient Advanced

All St udent s in t he LEA 52% 23% 25% 46% 35% 19%

All St udent s at t he School N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Male N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Female N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Black or African American N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

American Indian or Alaska Nat ive N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Asian N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Filipino N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Hispanic or Lat ino N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Nat ive Haw aiian or Pacific Islander N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

W hit e N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

T w o or More Races N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Socioeconomically Disadvant aged N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

English Learners N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

St udent s w it h Disabilit ies N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

St udent s Receiving Migrant Educat ion Services N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

(8)

Last updated: 1/27/2014

T he California Physical Fit ness T est (PFT ) is administ ered t o st udent s in grades five, seven, and nine only. T his t able displays by grade level t he percent of st udent s meet ing t he fit ness st andards for t he most recent t est ing period. For det ailed informat ion regarding t his t est , and comparisons of a school’s t est result s t o t he dist rict and st at e, see t he CDE PFT W eb page.

Not e: Scores are not show n w hen t he number of st udent s t est ed is t en or less, eit her because t he number of st udent s in t his cat egory is t oo small for st at ist ical accuracy or t o prot ect st udent privacy.

California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2012-13) California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2012-13)

Grade level

Percent of St udent s Meet ing Fit ness St andards

Four of Six St andards Five of Six St andards Six of Six St andards

5 22.4% 24.0% 32.8%

7 34.6% 14.0% 30.8%

9 N/A N/A N/A

(9)

Last updated: 1/27/2014

Last updated: 1/27/2014

Accountability

Academic Performance Index

T he Academic Performance Index (API) is an annual measure of st at e academic performance and progress of schools in California. API scores range from 200 t o 1,000, w it h a st at ew ide t arget of 800. For det ailed informat ion about t he API, see t he CDE API W eb page.

T his t able displays t he school’s st at ew ide and similar schools’ API ranks. T he st at ew ide API rank ranges from 1 t o 10. A st at ew ide rank of 1 means t hat t he school has an API score in t he low est t en percent of all schools in t he st at e, w hile a st at ew ide rank of 10 means t hat t he school has an API score in t he highest t en percent of all schools in t he st at e.

T he similar schools API rank reflect s how a school compares t o 100 st at ist ically mat ched “similar schools.” A similar schools rank of 1 means t hat t he school’s academic performance is comparable t o t he low est performing t en schools of t he 100 similar schools, w hile a similar schools rank of 10 means t hat t he school’s academic performance is bet t er t han at least 90 of t he 100 similar schools.

Not e: “N/D” means t hat no dat a w ere available t o t he CDE or LEA t o report . “B” means t he school did not have a valid API Base and t here is no Grow t h or t arget informat ion. “C” means t he school had significant demographic changes and t here is no Grow t h or t arget informat ion.

Academic Performance Index Ranks – Three-Year Comparison Academic Performance Index Ranks – Three-Year Comparison

API Rank 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

St at ew ide 9 10 10

Similar Schools 10 10 10

Academic Performance Index Growth by Student Group – Three-Year Comparison Academic Performance Index Growth by Student Group – Three-Year Comparison

Group Act ual API Change 2010-11 Act ual API Change 2011-12 Act ual API Change 2012-13

All St udent s at t he School 40 6 -7

Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Nat ive Asian

Filipino

Hispanic or Lat ino 39 8 -6

Nat ive Haw aiian or Pacific Islander W hit e

T w o or More Races

Socioeconomically Disadvant aged 41 6 -8

English Learners 63 -9 6

St udent s w it h Disabilit ies

(10)

Last updated: 1/27/2014

Last updated: 1/27/2014 T his t able displays, by st udent group, t he number of st udent s included in t he API and t he Grow t h API at t he school, LEA, and st at e level.

T he federal ESEA requires t hat all schools and dist rict s meet t he follow ing Adequat e Y early Progress (AY P) crit eria:

• Part icipat ion rat e on t he st at e’s st andards-based assessment s in ELA and mat hemat ics

• Percent proficient on t he st at e’s st andards-based assessment s in ELA and mat hemat ics

• API as an addit ional indicat or

• Graduat ion rat e (for secondary schools)

For det ailed informat ion about AY P, including part icipat ion rat es and percent proficient result s by st udent group, see t he CDE AY P W eb page.

Academic Performance Index Growth by Student Group – 2012-13 Growth API Academic Performance Index Growth by Student Group – 2012-13 Growth API Comparison

Comparison

Group Number of St udent s School Number of St udent s LEA Number of St udent s St at e

All St udent s at t he School 459 918 407,864 749 4,655,989 790

Black or African American 4 34,995 698 296,463 708

American Indian or Alaska Nat ive 0 1,557 756 30,394 743

Asian 4 17,001 908 406,527 906

Filipino 1 9,841 864 121,054 867

Hispanic or Lat ino 447 916 304,752 728 2,438,951 744

Nat ive Haw aiian or Pacific Islander 0 1,544 786 25,351 774

W hit e 2 36,642 871 1,200,127 853

T w o or More Races 1 1,289 564 125,025 824

Socioeconomically Disadvant aged 432 916 283,245 731 2,774,640 743

English Learners 232 888 162,555 706 1,482,316 721

St udent s w it h Disabilit ies 34 789 52,441 573 527,476 615

Adequate Yearly Progress Overall and by Criteria (School Year 2012-13) Adequate Yearly Progress Overall and by Criteria (School Year 2012-13)

AYP Crit eria School Dist rict

Made AY P Overall No No

Met Part icipat ion Rat e - English-Language Art s Y es No

Met Part icipat ion Rat e - Mat hemat ics Y es No

Met Percent Proficient - English-Language Art s Y es No

Met Percent Proficient - Mat hemat ics No No

Met API Crit eria Y es Y es

Met Graduat ion Rat e N/A N/A

(11)

Last updated: 1/27/2014 Schools and dist rict s receiving federal T it le I funding ent er Program Improvement (PI) if t hey do not make AY P for t w o consecut ive years in t he same cont ent area (ELA or mat hemat ics) or on t he same indicat or (API or graduat ion rat e). Aft er ent ering PI, schools and dist rict s advance t o t he next level of int ervent ion w it h each addit ional year t hat t hey do not make AY P. For det ailed informat ion about PI ident ificat ion, see t he CDE PI St at us Det erminat ions W eb page .

Not e: Cells shaded in black or w it h N/A values do not require dat a.

Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2013-14) Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2013-14)

Indicat or School Dist rict

Program Improvement St at us Not in PI In PI

First Y ear of Program Improvement 2010-2011

Y ear in Program Improvement Y ear 3

Number of Schools Current ly in Program Improvement N/A 658

Percent of Schools Current ly in Program Improvement N/A 83.1%

(12)

Last updated: 1/29/2014

Last updated: 1/27/2014

School Climate

Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2012-13) Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2012-13)

Grade Level Number of St udent s

Grade 5 132

Grade 6 123

Grade 7 112

Grade 8 104

T ot al Enrollment 471

Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2012-13) Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2012-13)

Group Percent of Tot al Enrollment

Black or African American 1.1

American Indian or Alaska Nat ive 0.0

Asian 0.9

Filipino 0.2

Hispanic or Lat ino 96.3

Nat ive Haw aiian or Pacific Islander 0.0

W hit e 1.3

T w o or More Races 0.2

Socioeconomically Disadvant aged 89.9

English Learners 50.8

St udent s w it h Disabilit ies 7.7

Black or A frican A merican A merican Indian or A lask a Nativ e A sian

Filipino Hispanic or Latino

Nativ e Hawaiian or Pacific Islander W hite

Two or More Races

1%

98%

1%

(13)

Last updated: 1/27/2014

Last updated: 1/28/2014

Last updated: 1/28/2014

* Number of classes indicat es how many classes fall int o each size cat egory (a range of t ot al st udent s per class).

* Number of classes indicat es how many classrooms fall int o each size cat egory (a range of t ot al st udent s per classroom). At t he secondary school level, t his informat ion is report ed by subject area rat her t han grade level.

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary) Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary)

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

Grade Level Average Class Size

Number of Classes *

Average Class Size

Number of Classes *

Average Class Size

Number of Classes *

1-20 21-32 33+ 1-20 21-32 33+ 1-20 21-32 33+

K 1 2 3 4

5 30.4 18 19 30.2 20

6 32.1 19 21 30.2 21

Ot her

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary) Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary)

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

Subject Average Class Size

Number of Classes *

Average Class Size

Number of Classes *

Average Class Size

Number of Classes *

1-22 23-32 33+ 1-22 23-32 33+ 1-22 23-32 33+

English 29.0 22 30.0 23 31.0 16

Mat hemat ics 29.0 27 28.0 27 31.0 16

Science 29.0 23 28.0 23 31.0 16

Social Science 29.0 22 27.0 22 31.0 16

School Safety Plan (School Year 2012-13) School Safety Plan (School Year 2012-13)

T he safet y of st udent s and st aff is a primary concern of KIPP LA Prep. All visit ors t o t he campus must sign in at t he office and w ear a visit or's pass at all t imes.

Supervision is provided t o ensure t he safet y of each st udent before school, during breaks, at lunch and aft er school. T o furt her safeguard t he w ell-being of st udent s and st aff, a comprehensive School Sit e Safet y Plan has been developed and includes regular safet y drills.

(14)

Last updated: 1/29/2014

Suspensions and Expulsions

* T he rat e of suspensions and expulsions is calculat ed by dividing t he t ot al number of incident s by t he t ot al enrollment .

School Dist rict

Rat e * 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

Suspensions 9.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 3.00

Expulsions 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Suspensions

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

0 2 4 6 8 10

School Suspensions District Suspensions

Expulsions

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

School Expulsions District Expulsions

(15)

Last updated: 1/27/2014

School Facilities

School Facility Good Repair Status (School Year 2013-14)

School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements (School Year 2013-14) School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements (School Year 2013-14)

KIPP LA Prep provides a safe and clean environment for st udent s, st aff, and volunt eers. Basic cleaning operat ions are performed on a daily basis t hroughout t he school year w it h emphasis on classrooms and rest rooms.

A cleaning schedule is in place t o ensure a clean, safe, and funct ional learning environment .

T he school sit e is in good condit ion. All syst ems are in proper w orking order and t he facilit ies are w ell maint ained.

A w ork order process is used w hen issues arise t hat require immediat e at t ent ion. Emergency repairs are given t he highest priorit y; repair request are complet ed efficient ly and in t he order in w hich t hey are received.

Syst em Inspect ed

Repair St at us

Repair Needed and Act ion Taken or Planned

Syst ems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sew er

Good

Regular inspect ions and maint enance

Int erior: Int erior Surfaces Good

Regular inspect ions and maint enance

Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness, Pest / Vermin Infest at ion

Good

Regular inspect ions and maint enance

Elect rical: Elect rical Good

Regular inspect ions and maint enance

Rest rooms/Fount ains: Rest rooms, Sinks/ Fount ains

Good

Regular inspect ions and maint enance

Safet y: Fire Safet y, Hazardous Mat erials Good

Regular inspect ions and maint enance

St ruct ural: St ruct ural Damage, Roofs Good

Regular inspect ions and maint enance

Ext ernal: Playground/School Grounds, W indow s/ Doors/Gat es/Fences

Good

Regular inspect ions and

maint enance

(16)

Last updated: 1/27/2014

Last updated: 1/29/2014

Teachers

Not e: “Misassignment s” refers t o t he number of posit ions filled by t eachers w ho lack legal aut horizat ion t o t each t hat grade level, subject area, st udent group, et c.

* T ot al T eacher Misassignment s includes t he number of Misassignment s of T eachers of English Learners.

Teacher Credentials Teacher Credentials

Teachers School Dist rict

2010- 11

2011- 12

2012- 13

2012- 13

W it h Full Credent ial 17 19 21

W it hout Full Credent ial 0 0 0

T eachers T eaching Out side Subject Area of Compet ence (w it h full credent ial)

0 0 0

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

0 5 10 15 20 25

Teachers with Full C redential Teachers without Full C redential

Teachers Teaching O utside Subject A rea of C ompetence

Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions

Indicat or

2011- 12

2012- 13

2013- 14

Misassignment s of T eachers of English Learners

0 0 0

T ot al T eacher Misassignment s* 0 0 0

Vacant T eacher Posit ions 0 0 0

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners Total Teacher Misassignments

Vacant Teacher Positions

(17)

Last updated: 1/27/2014

T he federal ESEA, also know n as NCLB, requires t hat core academic subject s be t aught by Highly Qualified T eachers, defined as having at least a bachelor’s degree, an appropriat e California t eaching credent ial, and demonst rat ed core academic subject area compet ence. For more informat ion, see t he CDE Improving T eacher and Principal Qualit y W eb page.

Not e: High-povert y schools are defined as t hose schools w it h st udent eligibilit y of approximat ely 40 percent or more in t he free and reduced price meals program. Low - povert y schools are t hose w it h st udent eligibilit y of approximat ely 39 percent or less in t he free and reduced price meals program.

Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2012-13) Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2012-13)

Locat ion of Classes

Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subject s Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers

Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subject s Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers

T his School 100 0

All Schools in Dist rict 100 0

High-Povert y Schools in Dist rict

100 0

Low -Povert y Schools in Dist rict

0 0

(18)

Last updated: 1/29/2014

Support Staff

Not e: Cells shaded in black or w it h N/A values do not require dat a.

* One Full-T ime Equivalent (FT E) equals one st aff member w orking full-t ime; one FT E could also represent t w o st aff members w ho each w ork 50 percent of full-t ime.

Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff (School Year 2012-13) Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff (School Year 2012-13)

Tit le Number of FTE* Assigned t o School Average Number of St udent s per Academic Counselor

Academic Counselor 0.6

Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development ) 0.0 N/A

Library Media T eacher (librarian) 0.0 N/A

Library Media Services St aff (paraprofessional) 0.0 N/A

Psychologist 0.1 N/A

Social W orker 0.0 N/A

Nurse 1.0 N/A

Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist 0.1 N/A

Resource Specialist (non-t eaching) 1.0 N/A

Ot her 6.0 N/A

(19)

Last updated: 1/29/2014

Curriculum and Instructional Materials

T his sect ion describes w het her t he t ext books and inst ruct ional mat erials used at t he school are from t he most recent adopt ion; w het her t here are sufficient t ext books and inst ruct ion mat erials for each st udent ; and informat ion about t he school’s use of any supplement al curriculum or non-adopt ed t ext books or inst ruct ional mat erials.

Y ear and mont h in w hich dat a w ere collect ed: July 2013

Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (Fiscal Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (Fiscal Year 2013-14)

Year 2013-14)

Core Curriculum Area Text books and inst ruct ional mat erials

From most recent adopt ion?

Percent st udent s lacking own assigned copy Reading/Language Art s

T eacher creat ed, unit s of st udy, Accelerat ed Reader, eSpark

Y es 0.0

Mat hemat ics

CPM, ST Mat h, eSpark Y es 0.0

Science

T eacher creat ed Y es 0.0

Hist ory-Social Science

DBQ, Hist ory Alive Y es 0.0

Foreign Language

N/A 0.0

Healt h

T eacher creat ed Y es 0.0

Visual and Performing Art s

T eacher creat ed Y es 0.0

Science Laborat ory Equipment

(grades 9-12) N/A 0.0

(20)

Last updated: 1/29/2014

Last updated: 1/27/2014

School Finances

Not e: Cells shaded in black or w it h N/A values do not require dat a.

Supplement al/Rest rict ed expendit ures come from money w hose use is cont rolled by law or by a donor. Money t hat is designat ed for specific purposes by t he dist rict or governing board is not considered rest rict ed. Basic/unrest rict ed expendit ures are from money w hose use, except for general guidelines, is not cont rolled by law or by a donor.

For det ailed informat ion on school expendit ures for all dist rict s in California, see t he CDE Current Expense of Educat ion & Per-pupil Spending W eb page. For informat ion on t eacher salaries for all dist rict s in California, see t he CDE Cert ificat ed Salaries & Benefit s W eb page. T o look up expendit ures and salaries for a specific school dist rict , see t he Ed-Dat a W eb sit e.

Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2011-12) Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2011-12)

Level

Tot al Expendit ures Per Pupil

Expendit ures Per Pupil (Supplement al / Rest rict ed)

Expendit ures Per Pupil (Basic / Unrest rict ed)

Average Teacher Salary

School Sit e N/A N/A N/A N/A

Dist rict N/A N/A N/A N/A

Percent Difference – School Sit e and Dist rict

N/A N/A -37.27% 9.96%

St at e N/A N/A N/A N/A

Percent Difference – School Sit e and St at e

N/A N/A 13.35% 5.46%

Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2012-13) Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2012-13)

Inst ruct ional services including: general inst ruct ion, int ervent ion inst ruct ion, special educat ion inst ruct ion, enrichment inst ruct ion and st udent t echnology.

Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2011-12) Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2011-12)

Cat egory Dist rict Amount St at e Average For Dist rict s In Same Cat egory

Beginning T eacher Salary $39,008 $41,462

Mid-Range T eacher Salary $62,307 $66,133

Highest T eacher Salary $77,359 $85,735

Average Principal Salary (Element ary) $104,537 $107,206

Average Principal Salary (Middle) $114,610 $111,641

Average Principal Salary (High) $115,924 $122,628

Superint endent Salary $275,000 $225,176

Percent of Budget for T eacher Salaries 35.0% 38.0%

(21)

Last updated: 1/27/2014

Teacher Salary Chart

Beginning Teacher Salary Mid-Range Teacher Salary Highest Teacher Salary 0

10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 80000

Principal Salary Chart

A v erage Principal Salary (Elementary )

A v erage Principal Salary (Middle)

A v erage Principal Salary (High) 0

20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000

(22)

Last updated: 1/29/2014

School Completion and Postsecondary Preparation

Admission Requirements for California’s Public Universities

Universit y of California

Admission requirement s for t he Universit y of California (UC) follow guidelines set fort h in t he Mast er Plan, w hich requires t hat t he t op one-eight h of t he st at e’s high school graduat es, as w ell as t hose t ransfer st udent s w ho have successfully complet ed specified college course w ork, be eligible for admission t o t he UC. T hese requirement s are designed t o ensure t hat all eligible st udent s are adequat ely prepared for Universit y-level w ork.

For general admissions requirement s, please visit t he UC Admissions Informat ion W eb page.

California St at e Universit y

Eligibilit y for admission t o t he California St at e Universit y (CSU) is det ermined by t hree fact ors:

Specific high school courses

Grades in specified courses and t est scores Graduat ion from high school

Some campuses have higher st andards for part icular majors or st udent s w ho live out side t he local campus area. Because of t he number of st udent s w ho apply, a few campuses have higher st andards (supplement ary admission crit eria) for all applicant s. Most CSU campuses have local admission guarant ee policies for st udent s w ho graduat e or t ransfer from high schools and colleges t hat are hist orically served by a CSU campus in t hat region. For admission, applicat ion, and fee informat ion see t he CSU W eb page .

Dropout Rate and Graduation Rate Dropout Rate and Graduation Rate

Indicat or

School Dist rict St at e

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12

Dropout Rat e 16.6 14.7 13.1

Graduat ion Rat e 68.7 61.0 66.4 74.72 77.14 78.73

Dropout /Graduat ion Rat e Chart

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

Dropout Rate (1 y ear) Graduation Rate

(23)

Last updated: 1/29/2014

Last updated: 1/27/2014 T his t able displays, by st udent group, t he percent of st udent s w ho began t he 2011-12 school year in grade t w elve and w ere a part of t he school’s most recent graduat ing class, meet ing all st at e and local graduat ion requirement s for grade t w elve complet ion, including having passed bot h t he ELA and mat hemat ics port ions of t he CAHSEE or received a local w aiver or st at e exempt ion.

Not e: “N/D” means t hat no dat a w ere available t o t he CDE or LEA t o report .

Completion of High School Graduation Requirements Completion of High School Graduation Requirements

Group

Graduat ing Class of 2012

School Dist rict St at e

All St udent s

Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Nat ive Asian

Filipino

Hispanic or Lat ino

Nat ive Haw aiian or Pacific Islander W hit e

T w o or More Races

Socioeconomically Disadvant aged English Learners

St udent s w it h Disabilit ies

Career Technical Education Participation (School Year 2012-13) Career Technical Education Participation (School Year 2012-13)

Measure CTE Program Part icipat ion

Number of pupils part icipat ing in CT E 0

Percent of pupils complet ing a CT E program and earning a high school diploma 0.0

Percent of CT E courses sequenced or art iculat ed bet w een t he school and inst it ut ions of post secondary educat ion 0.0

Courses for University of California and/or California State University Admission Courses for University of California and/or California State University Admission

UC/CSU Course Measure Percent

2012-13 St udent s Enrolled in Courses Required for UC/CSU Admission

2011-12 Graduat es W ho Complet ed All Courses Required for UC/CSU Admission

(24)

Last updated: 1/27/2014 Not e: Cells shaded in black or w it h N/A values do not require dat a.

*W here t here are st udent course enrollment s.

Advanced Placement Courses (School Year 2012-13) Advanced Placement Courses (School Year 2012-13)

Subject Number of AP Courses Offered* Percent of St udent s In AP Courses

Comput er Science N/A

English N/A

Fine and Performing Art s N/A

Foreign Language N/A

Mat hemat ics N/A

Science N/A

Social Science N/A

All Courses

(25)

Last updated: 1/27/2014

Instructional Planning and Scheduling

T his sect ion provides informat ion on t he annual number of school days dedicat ed t o st aff development for t he most recent t hree-year period.

Professional Development Professional Development

Regular professional development t akes place on a mont hly basis, w it h annual w orkshops and seminars at t ended by all t eachers. In addit ion, t eachers visit schools

t hat exemplify excellence, and part icipat e in t eam-building professional development opport unit ies cont inuously t hroughout t he year.

References

Related documents

bilingual phrases 2000 frases bilingues NIVEL 5 para el quinto curso de las escuelas de idiomas LEVEL 5 for the fifth course of the schools of languages...

The final regulations for the reauthorized Individual with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 2004 were published in the Federal Register on August 14, 2006, and became effective

Except the first lag of LGDP and LOPENNESS which they are way insignificant, aging has a negative impact on economic growth of Turkey in long-run as 1 percent increase in growth

Black candles used in workings of destruction are used to incite the slower destruction of enemies, opposed to accidents or sudden attacks associated with the color red. Black

Ama çok sarhoş olduğu için kendi başına çıkıp gidemedi.» Başgarson, yanın­ da duran aşçı kadına yavaşça m ırıldandı: «Demek ki, ziyarete gelmiş,

Packing in the work center offers you the following range of functions: ● Scanning of ○ HU Identification ○ Product ○ Warehouse Task ○ Storage Section ● Creation of

23/09/1998 Asst Exe Engr Head Works Sub Division Peechi ,

phenolic acid ethyl esters under ultrasound irradiation and in a solvent-free system was used to get monoglyceryl phenolic acids using N435 (yields over 97%). 356 Glyceryl