Evidence Outline

(1)

EVIDENCE EVIDENCE

Atty. Demetrio C. Custodio Atty. Demetrio C. Custodio

RULE 129 SECTIONS 1 & 2 – JUDICIAL NOTICE RULE 129 SECTIONS 1 & 2 – JUDICIAL NOTICE

1.

1. _{State Prosecutors vs. Muro – 236 S 505}_{State Prosecutors vs. Muro – 236 S 505}

2.

2. PePeopople vsle vs. Re. Reananzazares – 3res – 334 S 634 S 62424

3.

3. _{People vs. Tundag – 342 S 704}_{People vs. Tundag – 342 S 704}

RULE 129 SECTION 4 – JUDICIAL ADMISSIONS RULE 129 SECTION 4 – JUDICIAL ADMISSIONS

1.

1. _Aguen_{Aguenza vs. Metr}_{za vs. Metropolitan B}_{opolitan Bank & Trus}_{ank & Trust Co. – 27}_{t Co. – 271 S 1}_{1 S 1} 2.

2. _{Philamgen vs. Sweet Lines, Inc. – 212 S 195}_{Philamgen vs. Sweet Lines, Inc. – 212 S 195}

3.

3. AlAlanano vso vs. CA . CA – 2– 283 83 S 2S 26969 4.

4. PePeopople vsle vs. So. Solaylayao – 2ao – 262 S62 SCRCRA 255A 255 RULE 130 SECTION 1 – OBJECT EVIDENCE RULE 130 SECTION 1 – OBJECT EVIDENCE

1.

1. PePeopople vle vs. Ms. Mananalo – alo – 21219 S 69 S 65656 2.

2. PePeopople vle vs. Ms. Malalimiimit – 26t – 264 S 14 S 16767 3.

3. PePeopople vle vs. Js. Jumumamamoy – oy – 22221 S 31 S 33333 4.

4. PePeopople vle vs. Fs. Florlores – es – 32328 S 48 S 46161

RULE 130 SECTION 3 – BEST EVIDENCE RULE RULE 130 SECTION 3 – BEST EVIDENCE RULE

1.

1. _{Borje vs. Sandiganbayan – 125 S 763}_{Borje vs. Sandiganbayan – 125 S 763} 2.

2. _{Widows and Orphans Association, Inc. vs. CA – 212 S 360}_{Widows and Orphans Association, Inc. vs. CA – 212 S 360}

3.

3. PePeopople vle vs. Ts. Tanandoy doy – 19– 192 S 22 S 288

4.

4. _{Security Bank and Trust Co. vs. Triumphs Lumber and Construction Corp. – 301 S 537}_{Security Bank and Trust Co. vs. Triumphs Lumber and Construction Corp. – 301 S 537}

RULE 130 SECTION 9 – PAROL EVIDENCE RULE RULE 130 SECTION 9 – PAROL EVIDENCE RULE Inciong, Jr. vs. CA – 257 S 578

Inciong, Jr. vs. CA – 257 S 578 Nationa

National Irrigation Administration vs. Gamit – l Irrigation Administration vs. Gamit – 215 S 436215 S 436 Gurango vs. IAC – 215 S 332

Gurango vs. IAC – 215 S 332

1.

1. _{CKH Industrial and Development Corp. vs. CA – 272 S 333}_{CKH Industrial and Development Corp. vs. CA – 272 S 333}

RULE 130 SECTION 20 – WITNESSES RULE 130 SECTION 20 – WITNESSES

1.

1. PePeopople vle vs. Ts. Tananeo – eo – 21218 S 48 S 49494 2.

2. PePeopople vsle vs. Ba. Balanlanon – 2on – 233 S 633 S 67979 3.

3. PePeopople vle vs. Bs. Baiaid – 3d – 336 36 S 6S 65656 4.

4. PePeopople vs Lle vs Loliolito Hto Hononor – 58or – 584 S 544 S 5477 5.

5. PeoPeople vple vs Ss Solomolomon Dion Dioneoneda – da – 587 587 S 31S 3122

RULE 130 SECTION 22 – DISQUALIFICATION BY REASON OF MARRIAGE RULE 130 SECTION 22 – DISQUALIFICATION BY REASON OF MARRIAGE

(2)

1.

1. OrOrdoñdoño vso vs. Da. Daququigigan – an – 62 S 62 S 272700 2.

2. PePeopople vsle vs. Ca. Castastañeñeda Jrda Jr. – 88 S 5. – 88 S 56262

RULE 130 SECTION 23 – DEAD MAN STATUTE RULE RULE 130 SECTION 23 – DEAD MAN STATUTE RULE

1.

1. RaRazozon vn vs. s. IAIAC – C – 20207 S 7 S 232344

RULE 130 SECTION 24 – DISQUALIFICATION BY REASON OF PRIVILEDGED RULE 130 SECTION 24 – DISQUALIFICATION BY REASON OF PRIVILEDGED

COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION 1. 1. _{US vs. Antipolo – 37 P 726}_{US vs. Antipolo – 37 P 726} 2. 2. LiLim vsm vs. C. CA – A – 21214 S 4 S 272733 3. 3. _{Krohn vs. CA – 233 S 146}_{Krohn vs. CA – 233 S 146} 4. 4. FoFortirtich ch vs. vs. CA CA – 2– 268 68 S 1S 15252

RULE 130 SECTION 26 – ADMISSIONS OF A PARTY RULE 130 SECTION 26 – ADMISSIONS OF A PARTY

1.

1. PePeopople vsle vs. Ag. Agusustin – 2tin – 240 S 540 S 54141

2.

2. _{Tuason vs. CA – 241 S 695}_{Tuason vs. CA – 241 S 695}

3.

3. PePeopople vle vs. Cs. Chuhua Uy – a Uy – 32327 S 37 S 33535

4.

4. _{People vs. Cepeda – 324 S 290}_{People vs. Cepeda – 324 S 290}

RULE 130 SECTION 27 – OFFER OF COMPROMISE NOT ADMISSIBLE RULE 130 SECTION 27 – OFFER OF COMPROMISE NOT ADMISSIBLE

1.

1. PePeopople vle vs. Ls. Lasase – 2e – 219 S 19 S 585844

2.

2. _{Trans Pacific Industrial Supplies, Inc. vs. CA – 235 S 494}_{Trans Pacific Industrial Supplies, Inc. vs. CA – 235 S 494}

3.

3. PePeopople vle vs. Bs. Bueuemio mio – 2– 265 S 65 S 585822

4.

4. _{People vs. Amaca – 277 S 215}_{People vs. Amaca – 277 S 215}

RULE 130 SECTION 30 – ADMISSION BY CONSPIRATOR RULE 130 SECTION 30 – ADMISSION BY CONSPIRATOR

1.

1. PePeopople vsle vs. Co. Condndememenena – 23 S a – 23 S 919100 2.

2. PePeopople vle vs. Ps. Provrovo – o – 37 37 S 1S 199 3.

3. PePeopople vle vs. Ps. Pueuesca sca – 8– 87 S 17 S 13030

RULE 130 SECTION 32 – ADMISSION BY SILENCE RULE 130 SECTION 32 – ADMISSION BY SILENCE

1.

1. _{US vs. Bay – 27 P 495}_{US vs. Bay – 27 P 495}

RULE 130 SECTION 33 – CONFESSION RULE 130 SECTION 33 – CONFESSION

1.

1. PePeopople vsle vs. Ag. Agusustin – 2tin – 240 S 540 S 54141 2.

2. PePeopople vle vs. Ts. Tioziozon – on – 19198 S 38 S 36868 3.

3. PePeopople vle vs. Ts. Tujoujon – 2n – 215 S 15 S 555599 4.

4. PeoPeople vs Lple vs Ladaadao – GR 10o – GR 100940940-41 N0-41 Noveovembember 27, 20r 27, 200101 5.

5. PePeopople vs Ele vs Encncipiipido – 1do – 146 S 46 S 474788

6.

6. _{People vs Janjalani – 639 S 157}_{People vs Janjalani – 639 S 157}

RULE 130 SECTION 36 – HEARSAY RULE RULE 130 SECTION 36 – HEARSAY RULE

(3)

1.

1. PePeopople vle vs. Vs. Valalero ero – 11– 112 S 62 S 66161 2.

2. PePeopople vle vs. Ds. Damamasaso - 2o - 212 S 12 S 545477 3.

3. AgAgcacaoli voli vs. Ms. Moliolina na – 24– 249 S 49 S 48282 4.

4. PePeopople vle vs. Bs. Briorioso – so – 37 37 S 3S 33636

RULE 130 SECTION 37 – DYING DECLARATION RULE 130 SECTION 37 – DYING DECLARATION

1.

1. PePeopople vle vs. Ds. De Joe Joya – ya – 20203 S 343 S 3433

2.

2. _{People vs. Dunig – 215 S 469}_{People vs. Dunig – 215 S 469}

3.

3. PePeopople vle vs. As. Amamaca – ca – 27277 S 27 S 21515

4.

4. _{US vs. Antipolo – 37 P 726}_{US vs. Antipolo – 37 P 726}

RULE 130 SECTION 42 – PART OF THE RES GESTAE RULE 130 SECTION 42 – PART OF THE RES GESTAE

1.

1. _{People vs. Tiozon – 198 S 368}_{People vs. Tiozon – 198 S 368}

2.

2. PePeopople vle vs. Ns. Nararananja – 1ja – 108 P 08 P 787811 3.

3. PePeopople vsle vs. Pa. Palomlomonones – 3es – 336 S 36 S 8080 4.

4. PePeopople vle vs. Rs. Raqaqueuel – 26l – 265 S 25 S 24848

RULE 130 SECTION 44 – ENTRIES IN OFFICIAL RECORDS RULE 130 SECTION 44 – ENTRIES IN OFFICIAL RECORDS

1.

1. PePeopople vsle vs. Be. Bernarnaldeldez – 29z – 294 S 314 S 3177 2.

2. PePeopople vle vs. Ds. Diviivina – na – 22221 S 21 S 20909

3.

3. _{People vs. Leones – 117 S 382}_{People vs. Leones – 117 S 382}

4.

4. PePeopople vsle vs. Cr. Crisoisostostomo – 1mo – 160 S 460 S 477

5.

5. _{Feria vs. CA – 325 S 525}_{Feria vs. CA – 325 S 525}

RULE 130 SECTION 47 – TESTIMONY OR DEPOSITION AT A FORMER RULE 130 SECTION 47 – TESTIMONY OR DEPOSITION AT A FORMER

PROCEEDING PROCEEDING 1.

1. De LDe Leoeon vsn vs. P. Peoeople ple – 2– 210 S 10 S 151511 RULE 130 SECTION 48 – OPINION RULE RULE 130 SECTION 48 – OPINION RULE

1.

1. _{Lim vs. CA – 214 S 273 (supra)}_{Lim vs. CA – 214 S 273 (supra)}

2.

2. PePeopople vsle vs. Ga. Gallelleno – 2no – 291 S 791 S 76262

RULE 130 SECTION 49 – OPINION OF EXPERT WITNESS RULE 130 SECTION 49 – OPINION OF EXPERT WITNESS

1.

1. _{Cebu Shipyard and Engineering Works, Inc. vs. William Lines, Inc. – 306 S 762}_{Cebu Shipyard and Engineering Works, Inc. vs. William Lines, Inc. – 306 S 762}

RULE 131 SECTION 1 – BURDEN OF PROOF RULE 131 SECTION 1 – BURDEN OF PROOF

1.

1. JiJimemenenez vsz vs. NL. NLRC – RC – 25256 S 86 S 844 2.

2. MaMallllarari vsi vs. CA . CA – 26– 265 S 45 S 45656

RULE 131 SECTION 3 – DISPUTABLE PRESUMPTIONS RULE 131 SECTION 3 – DISPUTABLE PRESUMPTIONS

1.

1. LozLozano vano vs. Ds. De Loe Los Ss Santantos – os – 274 274 S 4S 455 2.

2. LRLRT vsT vs. N. Natiatividvidad – ad – 39397 S 77 S 755 3.

(4)

5.

5. PePeopople vle vs. Ns. Navavaja aja – 2– 220 S 20 S 626244 6.

6. PePeopople vsle vs. Ca. Castastañeñeda – 25da – 252 S 242 S 2477 7.

7. PePeopople vsle vs. Si. Simbmbulaulan – 2n – 214 S 514 S 53737 8.

8. PePeopople vsle vs. Ba. Ballulluda – 3da – 318 S 18 S 505033

RULE 132 SECTION 3 – RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF A WITNESS RULE 132 SECTION 3 – RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF A WITNESS

(IN RELATION TO THE RIGHT AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION) (IN RELATION TO THE RIGHT AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION) 1.

1. PePeopople vle vs. Ss. Salalververon – on – 22228 S 98 S 922 2.

2. PeoPeople vple vs. Ms. Malimalimit – 2it – 264 S 64 S 167 167 (su(suprapra))

RULE 132 SECTION 4 – ORDER IN THE EXAMINATION OF AN INDIVIDUAL RULE 132 SECTION 4 – ORDER IN THE EXAMINATION OF AN INDIVIDUAL

WITNESS WITNESS

1.

1. _{Bachrach Motors Co. Inc. vs. CIR – 86 S 27}_{Bachrach Motors Co. Inc. vs. CIR – 86 S 27} 2.

2. _{People vs. Padero – 226 S 810}_{People vs. Padero – 226 S 810}

RULE 132 SECTION 10 – LEADING AND MISLEADING QUESTIONS RULE 132 SECTION 10 – LEADING AND MISLEADING QUESTIONS

1.

1. _{People vs. Caparas – 111 S 68}_{People vs. Caparas – 111 S 68}

RULE 132 SECTION 13 – HOW WITNESS IMPEACHED BY EVIDENCE OF RULE 132 SECTION 13 – HOW WITNESS IMPEACHED BY EVIDENCE OF

INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS 1.

1. US US vsvs. B. Balaluyuyot – ot – 40 40 P 3P 38585

2.

2. _{People vs. Relucio – 86 S 227}_{People vs. Relucio – 86 S 227} 3.

3. _{People vs. Winston De Guzman – 288 S 346}_{People vs. Winston De Guzman – 288 S 346}

RULE 132 SECTION 19 – CLASSES OF DOCUMENTS RULE 132 SECTION 19 – CLASSES OF DOCUMENTS

1.

1. JoJososon vsn vs. Ba. Baltaltazazar – 19r – 194 S 14 S 11414 2.

2. SaSaleles vss vs. CA . CA – 2– 211 S 11 S 858588

3.

3. _{Lucente vs. Evangelista, Jr. – 396 S 627}_{Lucente vs. Evangelista, Jr. – 396 S 627} 4.

4. _{Yturralde vs. Azurin – 28 S 407}_{Yturralde vs. Azurin – 28 S 407}

RULE 132 SECTION 20 – PROOF OF PRIVATE DOCUMENT RULE 132 SECTION 20 – PROOF OF PRIVATE DOCUMENT

1.

1. RaRaz vz vs. s. IAIAC – 1C – 184 84 S 7S 72020 2.

(5)

RULE 132 SECTION 22 – HOW GENUINENESS OF HANDWRITING PROVED RULE 132 SECTION 22 – HOW GENUINENESS OF HANDWRITING PROVED

1.

1. LaLaynyno vso vs. Pe. Peopople – le – 21213 S 63 S 68686 2.

2. JaJacocob vsb vs. CA . CA – 2– 224 S 24 S 181899

3.

3. _{Security Bank and Trust Co. vs. Triumph Lumber and Construction Corp. – 301 S}_{Security Bank and Trust Co. vs. Triumph Lumber and Construction Corp. – 301 S}

537 (supra) 537 (supra) 4.

4. Sy Sy vsvs. C. CA – A – 33330 S 0 S 555500

RULE 132 SECTION 23 – PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AS EVIDENCE RULE 132 SECTION 23 – PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AS EVIDENCE

1.

1. DuDupilpilas vsas vs. Cab. Cabacacunungagan – 36 P 25n – 36 P 2544

RULE 132 SECTION 34 – OFFER OF EVIDENCE RULE 132 SECTION 34 – OFFER OF EVIDENCE

1.

1. CaCatutuira ira vs. vs. CA CA – 2– 236 36 S 3S 39898

2.

2. _{Vda. de Onate vs. CA – 250 S 283}_{Vda. de Onate vs. CA – 250 S 283}

3.

3. Sy vSy vs. Cs. CA – 3A – 330 S 30 S 55550 (s0 (supuprara))

4.

4. _{Macasiray vs. People – 291 S 154}_{Macasiray vs. People – 291 S 154} 5.

5. _{Tuason vs. CA – 241 S 695}_{Tuason vs. CA – 241 S 695} 6.

6. _{Candido and Rumbaua vs. CA – 253 S 78}_{Candido and Rumbaua vs. CA – 253 S 78}

7.

7. PePeopople vsle vs. Ba. Barerellallano – 3no – 319 S 519 S 56767 8.

8. PePeopople vsle vs. Sa. Sancnchehez – 30z – 308 S 268 S 2644 RULE 133

RULE 133

SECTION 1 – PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE, HOW DETERMINED SECTION 1 – PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE, HOW DETERMINED SECTION 2 – PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT

SECTION 2 – PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT 1.

1. DBP PDBP Pool of ool of AccreditAccredited Insued Insurance Crance Companieompanies vs Ras vs Radio Minddio Mindanao Nanao Network Getwork GRR 147039, Jan 27, 2006

147039, Jan 27, 2006 2.

2. PePeopople vle vs. Ms. Mejejia – ia – 55 55 S 4S 45353 3.

3. PePeopople vsle vs. Ma. Matritrimomonio – 2nio – 215 S 615 S 61313 4.

4. PePeopople vsle vs. Go. Gondndora – ora – 26265 S 405 S 4088 5.

5. PePeopople vle vs. Cs. Cababileiles – 2s – 248 S 48 S 202077 6.

6. PePeopople vsle vs. Lo. Lorerenznzo – 24o – 240 S 620 S 6244 7.

7. PePeopople vle vs. Rs. Rigigododon – 2on – 238 S 38 S 2727 8.

8. Tin Tin vs. vs. PePeopople – le – 36362 S 52 S 59494

RULE 133 SECTION 4 – CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, WHEN SUFFICIENT RULE 133 SECTION 4 – CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, WHEN SUFFICIENT

1.

1. _{People vs. Salvame – 270 S 766}_{People vs. Salvame – 270 S 766}

2.

2. PeoPeople vple vs. Ms. Malimalimit – 2it – 264 S 64 S 167 167 (su(suprapra))

3.

3. _{People vs. Ramos – 240 S 191}_{People vs. Ramos – 240 S 191} 4.

4. _{People vs. Adofina – 239 S 67}_{People vs. Adofina – 239 S 67}

RULE 133 SECTION 5 – SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE RULE 133 SECTION 5 – SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

1.

1. FaFabebella vlla vs. Cs. CA – A – 28282 S 2 S 252566 2.

2. PAPAL vsL vs. NL. NLRC – RC – 26263 S 63 S 63838 3.

(6)