• No results found

RECOMMENDATION DISCUSSION:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "RECOMMENDATION DISCUSSION:"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

DATE: April 3, 2015

TO: Matt Jordan, General Manager

FROM: Alison Adams, Chief Technical Officer

SUBJECT: Comprehensive Asset Management Program - Presentation

SUMMARY: Tampa Bay Water is implementing its comprehensive asset management

program, RISE, which is fundamental for maintaining a reliable water supply and delivery system. A new component to this program is development of an Environmental Management System for continual improvement. Status of all program activities underway is provided in this item.

RECOMMENDATION: Receive status report and presentation

DISCUSSION: Tampa Bay Water is implementing a comprehensive asset management

program, RISE, which stands for Resilient Infrastructure Systems and Employees. The Asset Management Assessment Report and Implementation Plan was completed in April 2014. This document details a multi-year formal approach to asset management through integrating and enhancing existing data, systems, business processes, and practices into a comprehensive asset management program. Staff began implementing the Asset Management Implementation plan in December 2013 with the Board’s decision to purchase Maximo as the Agency’s computerized maintenance management system.

A new component to the overall Asset Management program is the Environment Management System (EMS). The EMS framework ensures that best management practices are defined and used within the organization to reduce environmental impacts and continually improve organizational performance. The framework is based on ISO 14001 standards and is endorsed by EPA and water utility organizations. Use of this framework will provide the agency with the best opportunity to successfully implement a continual improvement program. Implementation of this program is planned as an internal staff effort.

Accomplishments to date include:

 Maximo “go live” –successful start-up of phase I scope

 Implementation of a vertical asset hierarchy structure in Maximo

 Completion of maintenance work flows, job plans and preventive maintenance schedules for implementation in Maximo

 Purchase of Aurigo Capital Improvement software and development of workflows for CIP implementation

 Board approval of updated Strategic Plan

 Established cross functional teams across the agency  Established an Asset Management Advisory Team  Developed internal communications plan

(2)

Matt Jordan April 3, 2015 Page 2

Work in progress:

 Performance measure monitoring using operation and executive dashboards  Developing an Environmental Management System within the Agency

 Developing the scope and level of effort to implement Maximo for linear assets  Refinement of maintenance job plans

 Development of additional asset-specific job plans

 Optimizing Maximo for vertical asset maintenance work scheduling, assigning, tracking and reporting

 Implementation of Aurigo CIP software with go-live scheduled for October 2015  Review of the Agency’s renewal and replacement planning model

 Continued development of a comprehensive training tracking process

Planned Future work:

 Integration of MUNIS and Maximo to include inventory/warehouse and purchase orders

 Implementation of the service request and work order Maximo functions for non-maintenance departments (e.g., engineering, survey, monitoring, mitigation, and laboratory)

 Implementation of IT help functionality in Maximo

 Updating/revising the Renewal and Replacement planning model

The majority of costs have occurred within the first two years of implementation through 2015 (see Table 1). The updated actual and planned expenditures for this program for years 2014 and 2015 are $2,151,843. In June 2014 the estimated expenditures for 2014 and 2015 presented to the Board were $1,791,007. The difference is a result of the final software budget approved for 2015 and the increase of $259,886 to purchase the CIP software and professional services which was approved by the Board December 2014. The budget estimate for FY 2016 is $625,000, resulting in total program funding of $2,776,843 through 2016. However this does not include additional outside services not included in the 2016 proposed budget that may be needed to fully integrate our MUNIS financial software system with Maximo. Discussions are continuing with MUNIS to fully evaluate the issues and solutions.

Program costs to date include software purchases (Maximo and Aurigo CIP), professional services to integrate the new software systems, and professional services to support staff in various aspects of the Asset Management Implementation Plan.

The Implementation Plan charts a set of 17 projects (see Table 2) which actually began January 2014. These projects cover the areas of Maintenance Management, Financial tools, Level of service/Risk, Continual Improvement, Training and Strategic planning. An incremental approach is being used to address completion of the 17 projects with the intent to involve and train staff during the earlier project implementation steps and then transition the work away from consultant services to staff. Completion of the implementation plan is dependent upon staff availability and budget.

(3)

BACKGROUND: Since Tampa Bay Water’s inception in 1998, its infrastructure has

increased dramatically. In April 2011, the Board adopted the 2011 Strategic Plan. The updated Strategic Plan was approved by the Board in December 2014. In support of the Board’s mission to provide water now and for future generations, the vision to be a leader in innovation and best practices, the value to strive for continuous improvement in everything we do, the goal to achieve a reliable water supply and delivery system, and the strategy to implement a framework for long term regional system reliability, Tampa Bay Water staff are implementing a comprehensive asset management program, similar to several of our member governments, in accordance with the water utility industry best practices.

Asset Management is maintaining a desired level of service at the lowest life cycle cost with limited resources and at an acceptable level of risk. Lowest life cycle cost determines the best appropriate cost for rehabilitating, repairing or replacing an asset. Asset management is implemented through as Asset Management Program which includes a written Asset Management Plan. Implementation of a comprehensive Asset Management Program is the foundation for long-term water supply planning.

(4)

Matt Jordan April 3, 2015 Page 4

Table 1. Asset Management Program Revised Asset Management

Program Element Expenditures 2014 2015 Budget Projected 2016 Budget Total Plan Development $139,000 $139,000 Software licenses and maintenance $169,957 $323,936 $135,000 $628,893 Maximo Phase I Integration Services $395,000 $154,050 $549,050 Implementation Plan Services $468,000 $285,000 $290,000 $1,043,000 Maximo Phase II $216,900 $200,000 $416,900 Total $1,171,957 $979,886 $625,000 $2,776,843 Notes:

(1) June 2014 estimated program cost through 2016 was $2,298,257. The program cost update is due to a decision to purchase Aurigo CIP software, the final software budget for 2015 and refinements in the 2016 proposed budget. The overall program budget is subject to further refinement based on project priorities, degree of difficulty in Maximo/MUNIS integration, and staff availability.

(2) Software licenses and maintenance includes cost for Aurigo CIP software and professional services

(5)

Asset Registry and Inventory ‐ Linear assets (Project  2) 2015 Will start linear assets June 2015 Sep‐14 Phase 1b Maximo Implementation 2015 Linear Asset Maximo Implementation level  of effort under evaluation Sep‐15 Phases 2/3 Maximo Implementation (Project 4) 2016 Other agency depts: Engr, Lab, Hydro  monitoring, IT, Buildings and Grounds start  in FY 2016 / one workshop in 2015 with CH2 ?? Maintenance Workflows and SOPs (Project 5) 2014 Completed NA

Maintenance Strategies, FEMA, and PMs (project 6) 2014 In progress Sep‐15

Condition Assessment Process for Renewal and  Replacement (project 7) 2015 Preliminary evaluation of current condition  assessment processes being lead by maint.  Strategies team Sep‐17 Condition Assessment Process for Renewal and 

Replacement (project 8) 2016 Not started Sep‐17

Maintenance Strategies  Joe Kehoe Mandi Rice Implement Maintenance Strategies (project 9) 2015 In progress Sep‐15

Development of LOS (project 10) 2014

Draft executive and operational dashboards 

under review  Dec‐15

Risk/Reliability Models development and 

implementation (project 11) 2015 In progress, will slow down this project Dec‐16

Continual Improvement  Michelle Biddle Chuck Carden Continual Improvement (project 12)

2014

Initiated light blub project forms. For 2015  will develop a Corrective and Preventive 

Action Request process using ISO 14001 Sep‐15 Continual Improvement  Alison Adams Develop Environmental Management System 

(refinement of project 12) 2015 Developing framework Dec‐18

CIP software procurement support 2014

Purchased software, go live scheduled for 

October 2015 Sep‐16

Business Case Evaluation process and 

implementation 2016 Deferred until 2016 Sep‐16

Review of Renewal and Replacement model and  Maximo data extraction for R/R model (project 13 &  14) 2016 Preliminary assessment draft scope under  review may be deferred until 2016 Sep‐16 Development training programs related to asset  management (project 15) 2014 Staff are moving forwarding with setting up  a training tracking system for MUNIS and  Maximmo Sep‐15 Incorporate Asset Management into Agency 

Strategic Plan and Update Strategic Plan (project 16) 2014 Board approval December 2014 Dec‐14

Develop internal communication strategies specific 

to asset management program (project 17) 2014 Completed Sep‐14

Asset Hierarchy Team Jennifer Lawrence ‐ Jones Mandi Rice

CMMS Implementation Jennifer Lawrence ‐ Jones Mandi Rice

Phase I Maximo Implementation / EDI contract 

(Project 3) 2014 Go live successful Jan‐15

Maintenance Strategies  Joe Kehoe Mandi Rice

Condition Assessment ** Not established Not established

Level of Service/Risk Jon Kennedy Alison Adams

Financial Forecasting  Maribel Medina Christina Sackett

Strategy,  Communications,  Training 

References

Related documents

UPnP Control Point (DLNA) Device Discovery HTTP Server (DLNA, Chormecast, AirPlay Photo/Video) RTSP Server (AirPlay Audio) Streaming Server.. Figure 11: Simplified

An analysis of the economic contribution of the software industry examined the effect of software activity on the Lebanese economy by measuring it in terms of output and value

The summary resource report prepared by North Atlantic is based on a 43-101 Compliant Resource Report prepared by M. Holter, Consulting Professional Engineer,

Let us now return to the anonymous Times reviewer and his observation that in the Biblical Songs, Dvořák set psalms in ‘anything but a conventional manner.’ 1 As I have shown, the

The objective of the study was to conduct a feasibility study of the use of manual image segmentation using sonographic images of axillary lymph nodes to create 3D models..

Results of the survey are categorized into the following four areas: primary method used to conduct student evaluations, Internet collection of student evaluation data,

If the roll is equal to or higher then the model's shooting skill then it hits and wounds as described in close combat.. If the roll was lower then the model's shooting skill then

In October 1995, the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) began the CAHPS® initiative with researchers from Harvard Medical School, RAND, and Research Triangle