• No results found

Positive properties of Green’s function for focal type BVPs of singular nonlinear fractional differential equations and its application

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Positive properties of Green’s function for focal type BVPs of singular nonlinear fractional differential equations and its application"

Copied!
12
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

R E S E A R C H

Open Access

Positive properties of Green’s function for

focal-type BVPs of singular nonlinear

fractional differential equations and its

application

Manli Jin and Yuguo Lin

*

*Correspondence: [email protected]

School of Mathematics, Beihua University, Jilin, 132013, China

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the properties of Green’s function for the singular nonlinear fractional differential equation boundary value problem

0+u(t) =f

(

t,u(t)), 0 <t< 1,

u(0) =u(0) =u(1) =u(1) = 0,

where 3 <

α

≤4 is a real number and0+is the standard Riemann-Liouville

differentiation. As an application of the properties of Green’s function, we give the existence of multiple positive solutions for the above mentioned singular boundary value problems. Our tools are Leray-Schauder nonlinear alternative and Krasnoselskii’s fixed-point theorem on cones.

MSC: 34A08; 34B18; 45B05

Keywords: fractional differential equation; positive solution; fractional Green’s function; fixed-point theorem

1 Introduction

Fractional differential equations have been of great interest recently. This is due to the in-tensive development of the theory of fractional calculus itself as well as its applications. Apart from diverse areas of mathematics, fractional differential equations arise in rheol-ogy, dynamical processes in selfsimilar and porous structures, fluid flows, electrical net-works, viscoelasticity, chemical physics, and many other branches of science. For details, see [–]. Now the boundary value problem for fractional differential equations attracts lots of attention. Especially, Jiang and Yuan [] considered the nonlinear fractional differ-ential equation Dirichlet-type boundary value problem and established the existence of positive solutions for the corresponding BVP. Xuet al.[] dealt with the following equa-tion:

+u(t) =f

t,u(t),  <t< ,

u() =u() =u() =u() = .

(2)

Some properties of Green’s function for the above BVP were obtained. For other related works on the fractional differential equation, see [–].

Motivated by the above mentioned works, we consider the properties of Green’s func-tion for

+u(t) =f

t,u(t),  <t< , (.)

u() =u() =u() =u() = , (.)

where  <α≤ is a real number and

+ is the standard Riemann-Liouville differentia-tion. As an application of Green’s function, we will give the existence of multiple positive solutions for singular boundary value problems (.), (.). As far as we know, no contri-butions concerning BVP (.), (.) exist.

The outline of this paper is as follows. In Section , we derive the corresponding Green’s function and some of its properties. In Section , by using Leray-Schauder nonlinear alter-native and Krasnoselskii’s fixed-point theorem in a cone, we offer criteria for the existence of positive solutions for singular BVP (.), (.).

2 Background materials and Green’s function

For the convenience of the reader, we present here the necessary definitions from frac-tional calculus theory. These definitions can be found in the recent literature such as [].

Definition .[] The Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of orderα>  of a function

y: (,∞)→Ris given by

+y(t) =  (α)

t

(ts)α–y(s)ds

provided the right-hand side is pointwise defined on (,∞).

Definition .[] The Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative of orderα>  of a contin-uous functiony: (,∞)→Ris given by

+y(t) =  (nα)

d dt

n t

y(s) (ts)αn+ds,

wheren= [α] + , [α] denotes the integer part of the numberα, provided that the right-hand side is pointwise defined on (,∞).

From the definition of the Riemann-Liouville derivative, we can obtain the statement.

Lemma .[] Letα> .If we assume that uC(, )∩L(, ),then the fractional differ-ential equation

+u(t) = 

has u(t) =C–+C–+· · ·+CNtαN,Ci∈R,i= , , . . . ,N,as unique solutions,where

(3)

Lemma .[] Assume that uC(, )∩L(, )with a fractional derivative of orderα> 

that belongs to C(, )∩L(, ).Then

Iα++u(t) =u(t) +C–+C–+· · ·+CNtαN

for some Ci∈R,i= , , . . . ,N,N is the smallest integer greater than or equal toα.

In the following, we present Green’s function of the fractional differential equation boundary value problem (.), (.).

Lemma . Given hC[, ]and <α≤,the unique solution of

+u(t) =h(t),  <t< , (.)

u() =u() =u() =u() =  (.)

is

u(t) =

G(t,s)h(s)ds,

where

G(t,s) =

⎧ ⎨ ⎩

(ts)α–+–(–s)α–[(α–)t(–s)–(α–)t+(α–)s]

(α) , st,

–(–s)α–[(α–)t(–s)–(α–)t+(α–)s]

(α) , ts.

(.)

Here G(t,s)is called Green’s function of BVP(.), (.).

Proof We may apply Lemma . to reduce (.) to an equivalent integral equation

u(t) =

+h(t) +C–+C–+C–+C–

for someC,C,C,C∈R. Consequently, the general solution of (.) is

u(t) =  (α)

t

(ts)α–h(s)ds+C–+C–+C–+C–.

By (.), we get thatC=C= , and

C=

(α)

(α– )( –s)α–– (α– )( –s)α–h(s)ds,

C=

α–  (α)

( –s)α–sh(s)ds.

Therefore, the unique solution of (.), (.) is

u(t) =  (α)

t

(ts)α–h(s)ds

+ 

(α)

(4)

+α– 

This completes the proof.

From the expression ofG(t,s), we can obtain the following properties.

Lemma . Green’s function G(t,s)defined by(.)has the following properties:

Gtt(t,s)≤, ≤st≤; (.)

Proof of(.) By direct calculation, we get

(5)

On the one hand, forts, from (.), we can get

≤(α– )( –s)α–s

=(α)Gt(,s)≤(α)Gt(t,s)≤(α)Gt(s,s)

= (α– )–( –s)α–– )s( –s) – (α– )s+ (α– )s

= (α– )–( –s)α–(α– ) – (α– )s

≤(α– )(α– )–( –s)α–.

On the other hand, forts, we have

(α)Gt(t,s) = (α– )–( –s)α–

(α– )t( –s) – (α– )t+ (α– )s

≤(α– )–( –s)α–(α– )s

= (α– )(α– )–( –s)α–

and

(α)Gt(t,s) = (α– )–( –s)α–

(α– )t( –s) – (α– )t+ (α– )s

≥(α– )–( –s)α–(α– )s– (α– )s+ (α– )s

= (α– )–( –s)α–– )s.

Hence,

≤(α)Gt(t,s)≤(α– )(α– )–( –s)α–, ts.

In summary, the property (.) holds.

Proof of(.) Forts, we have

(α)G(t,s) =–( –s)α–(α– )t( –s) – (α– )t+ (α– )s

–( –s)α–– )ssα–( –s)α–

and

(α)G(t,s) =–( –s)α–(α– )t( –s) – (α– )t+ (α– )s

–( –s)α–– )s– (α– )s+ (α– )s

= (α– )stα–( –s)α–

≥(α– )–( –s)α––.

So, we have

(6)

Forts, we first prove that

(α)G(t,s)≥(α– )–( –s)α––, st. (.)

For fixeds∈(, ), let

z(t) =(α)G(t,s) – (α– )–( –s)α––, t∈[s, ].

Obviously,z(s)≥ andz()≥. Equation (.) together with

∂t

–(α– )–( –s)α––= –(α– )(α– )–( –s)α––≤

implies thatz(t)≤,t∈[s, ]. Hence (.) holds.

By (.) we know that(α)G(t,s) is increasing inton [s, ]. Hence, forst,

(α)G(t,s)≤(α)G(,s)

= ( –s)α–+ ( –s)α–(α– )( –s) – (α– ) + (α– )s

= ( –s)α–+ ( –s)α–[– + s]

= ( –s)α–( –s)–  + s

= ( –s)α–s( –s)≤( –s)α––.

In summary,

(α– )–( –s)α––≤(α)G(t,s)≤–( –s)α–, st.

This completes the proof of property (.).

As an application of properties of Green’s function, we will establish the existence of positive solutions for BVP (.), (.) in Section , in which Leray-Schauder nonlinear al-ternative and Krasnoselskii’s fixed-point theorem on cones are our main tools. For the convenience of the reader, we recall the two famous theorems here.

Lemma . Assume thatis a relative subset of a convex set K in a normed space X.Let A:¯ →K be a compact map with∈.Then

(a) Ahas a fixed point in¯,or

(b) there arex∂and <λ< such thatx=λA(x).

Lemma . Let E be a Banach space,and let CE be a cone in E.Assume that,are

open subsets of E with∈⊂ ¯⊂,and let T:C∩(¯\)→C be a completely

continuous operator such that either

(i) Tuu,uC;Tuu,uC;or

(ii) Tuu,uC;Tuu,uC.

(7)

3 Positive solution of a singular problem

In this section, we establish the existence of positive solutions for singular BVP (.), (.). Throughout this section, we always assume thatf : [, ]×(,∞)→[,∞) is continuous. Given aL(, ), we writea ifa≥ fort∈[, ] and it is positive in a subset of positive measure.

LetC[, ] be endowed with the maximum norm,u=max≤t≤|u(t)|.

Theorem . Suppose that the following hypotheses hold:

(H) for each constantL> ,there exists a continuous functionφLsuch thatf(t,u)≥

(H) there exists a positive numberrsuch that

sider the family of integral equations

(8)

Thus, it follows from the choice ofn, (.), (.), (H) and (H) that for allt∈[, ],

which contradicts (H) and the claim is proved.

It is easy to check from (.), (.) and (H) that the operator

is completely continuous, wheren∈N. We omit the details here.

Now Lemma . guarantees that the integral equationu(t) =Sn(t) has a solution,

(9)

theorem, we have that

u(t) =

G(t,s)fs,u(s)ds,

where (.) is used. Therefore,u(t) is a positive solution of BVP (.), (.).

Theorem . Suppose that(H), (H), (H)and(H)are satisfied.Furthermore,assume

that(H)there exists a positive number R>r such that the following inequality holds:

α–  (α)g(R)

–( –s)α–

 +h(

(α–)–R

 )

g((α–)–R)

dsR.

Then BVP(.), (.)has another solutionu with r˜ <˜u<R.

Proof To show the existence ofu˜, we will use Lemma .. Define

K=

uC[, ] :u(t)≥(α– )t

α–

ufort∈[, ]

. (.)

It is obvious thatKis a cone onC[, ]. Let

=

uC[, ] :u<r,

=

uC[, ] :u<R.

Next, the operatorT:K∩(\)→C[, ] is defined by

(Tu)(t) =

G(t,s)fs,u(s)ds.

It is easy to check that the operatorT mapsK∩(\) intoK. In fact, for anyu

K∩(\), we have from (.) that fort∈[, ],

Tu ≤ 

(α)

–( –s)α–fs,u(s)ds

and

(Tu)(t)≥(α– )t

α–

(α)

–( –s)α–fs,u(s)ds.

This implies that (Tu)(t)≥(α–)–Tu, that is,T :K∩(\)→K. In addition, by

a similar argument as in Theorem ., it is not difficult to prove that the operator T :

K∩(\)→Kis completely continuous. Now we prove that

(10)

For anyuK, from (.), (H), (H), (.) and (H), we have that fort∈[, ],

Therefore, (.) holds. Next, we will prove that

Tuu, ∀uK. (.)

This implies that (.) holds.

It follows from Lemma . that the operatorT has a fixed pointu˜ ∈K∩(\).

Clearly, this fixed pointu˜ is a positive solution of BVP (.), (.) satisfyingruR.

Example . Consider the boundary value problem

+u(t) =ua(t) +μub(t), t∈(, ),

μis some positive constant.

(11)

Proof We will apply Theorems . and . to obtain our desired results. Note that (H)

holds withφL(t) =La. Let

g(u) =ua, h(u) =μub, K= .

Then (H) and (H) are satisfied. Since  <a<αα––, (H) is also satisfied. Now for (H) to

be satisfied, we need

μ<Ar

+a– 

ra+b

for somer> , where

A=

+a– )a (α)

s(α–)(–a)( –s)α–ds

–

.

Therefore, (.) has at least one nonnegative solution for

 <μ<μ:=sup

r>

Ar+a– 

ra+b .

Note that ifb< ,μ=∞. Ifb> , set

l(r) :=Ar

+a– 

ra+b .

The functionl(r) possesses a maximum at

r:=

a+b

(b– )A

a+ >

A

a+ ,

thenμ=l(r) > . We have the desired results (i) and (ii). Ifb> , condition (H) becomes

μR

+aB

CRa+b (.)

for someR> , where

B=α–  (α)

–( –s)α–ds,

C=(α– ) a+b+

a+b(α)

s(α–)(a+b+)( –s)α–ds.

Sinceb> , the right-hand side of (.) tends to  asR→+∞. Thus, for any given  < μ<μ, it is always possible to find anRrsuch that (.) is satisfied. Therefore, (.)

has another nonnegative solutionu˜. This implies that (iii) holds.

Competing interests

(12)

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed equally in this article. They read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The author Yuguo Lin would like to express his gratitude to Professor Daqing Jiang for his careful direction. This work was partially supported by NSFC of China (No. 11201008).

Received: 22 May 2013 Accepted: 22 May 2013 Published: 6 June 2013 References

1. Kilbas, AA, Srivastava, HM, Trujillo, JJ: Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations. North-Holland Mathematics Studies, vol. 204. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)

2. Oldham, KB, Spanier, J: The Fractional Calculus. Academic Press, New York (1974)

3. Nonnenmacher, TF, Metzler, R: On the Riemann-Liouville fractional calculus and some recent applications. Fractals3, 557-566 (1995)

4. Tatom, FB: The relationship between fractional calculus and fractals. Fractals3, 217-229 (1995)

5. Podlubny, I: Fractional Differential Equations. Mathematics in Science and Engineering, vol. 198. Academic Press, New York (1999)

6. Samko, SG, Kilbas, AA, Marichev, OI: Fractional Integral and Derivatives: Theory and Applications. Gordon & Breach, Yverdon (1993)

7. Jiang, D, Yuan, C: The positive properties of the Green function for Dirichlet-type boundary value problems of nonlinear fractional differential equations and its application. Nonlinear Anal.72, 710-719 (2010)

8. Xu, X, Jiang, D, Yuan, C: Multiple positive solutions for the boundary value problem of a nonlinear fractional differential equation. Nonlinear Anal.71, 4676-4688 (2009)

9. Babakhani, A, Gejji, VD: Existence of positive solutions of nonlinear fractional differential equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl.278, 434-442 (2003)

10. Delbosco, D, Rodino, L: Existence and uniqueness for a nonlinear fractional differential equation. J. Math. Anal. Appl.

204, 609-625 (1996)

11. Zhang, S: The existence of a positive solution for a nonlinear fractional differential equation. J. Math. Anal. Appl.252, 804-812 (2000)

12. Zhang, S: Existence of positive solution for some class of nonlinear fractional differential equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl.278, 136-148 (2003)

13. Nakhushev, AM: The Sturm-Liouville problem for a second order ordinary differential equation with fractional derivatives in the lower terms. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR234, 308-311 (1977)

14. Bai, Z, Lü, H: Positive solutions for boundary value problem of nonlinear fractional differential equation. J. Math. Anal. Appl.311, 495-505 (2005)

15. Benchohra, M, Graef, JR, Hamani, S: Existence results for boundary value problems with nonlinear fractional differential equations. Appl. Anal.87(7), 851-863 (2008)

doi:10.1186/1687-1847-2013-159

References

Related documents

Keywords: human values, meaning of work, quality of life, knowledge society, creativity,.. Greece,

It begins with a definition o f issue systems and static and dynamic interconnections before considering the probable patterns of variation between parties - for

Head designers, landscape and art directors /Architettura, paesaggio e direzione artistica: Carlo Cappai, Maria Alessandra Segantini, C+S Architects. Structural

In the distant periphery, composed of terms that are neither frequently nor immediately mentioned by the participants (high rank and low frequency) among the different elements of the

The main themes identified were: limited awareness and knowledge of hepatitis B and C (especially lack of awareness about the asymptomatic nature of chronic infection and

(2011), who found that both fear and disgust frames produce similar effects on resources allocated to encode mes- sages (in anti-tobacco ads), the current study has observed a

Hanushek and Woessmann (2006) or Ammermueller (2005), which find th at tracking increases educational inequality and exacerbates the effect of family background

Moreover, the model does not investigate the peak behavior of flows which leads to less accurate bounds while we consider performance analysis for VBR traffic in on-chip