• No results found

Part A: Summary Report CONFIRMED

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Part A: Summary Report CONFIRMED"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

PROGRAMME APPROVAL/REVIEW/MODIFICATION REPORT Part A: Summary Report

CONFIRMED

A1 Programme Specification Title(s)

Legal Practice Course

A2 Home Department/School Manchester Law School A3 Home Faculty Business and Law

A4 Type of Event Review

A5 Date of Event 15 December 2014 A6 Objectives of Event

To ensure that the design, academic standards and quality of learning opportunities of the existing provision, together with the proposed developments, given strategic approval on 26 June 2014(SA ref PARM/14/047 refers) and as outlined in 7 below, remain appropriate to the award to which the provision leads and are informed by reference to institutional regulations and policies, national benchmarks (particularly the Framework for Higher Education

Qualifications and relevant subject benchmarks) and relevant professional and employment demands.

A7 Brief Outline of Proposal/Propose Developments  Last periodic review – 2008/2009

 MMU Award

 Qualification as a solicitor is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). Satisfactory completion of a Legal Practice Course (LPC) is an essential requirement to qualify as a solicitor in England and Wales under the provisions of the SRA Training Regulations 2011 Part 1 – Qualification Regulations. The LPC builds on students’ academic knowledge of the law and prepares them for their training and early years in practice. The LPC course outcomes, course design and assessment methods are specified by the SRA. The course has two parts: Stage 1 which covers all the compulsory elements of the course and Stage 2 which is made up of three vocational electives chosen from a range of elective subjects on offer. Stage 1 and Stage 2 are separate and can be studied consecutively or simultaneously. Students obtain the Post Graduate Diploma in Legal Practice on successful completion of Stage 1 and Stage 2.

 The LPC is validated in its current format by the SRA until the end of the 2017/18 academic year. The SRA and Bar Standards Board completed a review of professional legal education during 2013/15. The full recommendations will have a profound impact on professional legal education for the future. In order to ensure that there is stability and continuity the professional bodies have indicated that the current arrangements will remain in place until the end of 2017/18. This proposal therefore is required to ensure that we have robust and appropriate provision in place for 2015/16, 2016/17 and 2017/18 which takes account of updates and amendments to the current LPC. A further validation will be

(2)

required prior to 2018/19 academic year when the new proposals are full developed by the professional bodies.

 The LPC Assessment regulations are governed by the requirements of the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and MMU’s Taught Postgraduate Regulations from time to time in force.

 Where the SRA requirements are in conflict with the MMU Taught Postgraduate Regulations, the SRA regulations take precedence and the MMU regulations have been varied accordingly.

 Exemptions were granted on 21 September 2009. A further request for variations was made on 30 October 2014 and was not approved on 27 November 2014.

 A single request for exemption will be submitted.

 The changes will roll in from September 2015. A8 Conduct of the Event and Panel Membership

The event, comprising private panel meetings and meetings of the panel with members of the programme team [and representatives of current/former students], was held on the All Saints Campus.

The panel included the following internal members: Christine Horrocks (Panel Chair)

Carole Forbes (Faculty Representative) Julie Watson (CASQE Representative) Karen Weekes (Panel Secretary)

Helen Poveda (Student Representative)

Barbara Walters (Management Services Manager) Julie Wright (PARM Chair Observer)

The panel included the following external members appointed by the Head of Centre for Academic Standards & Quality Enhancement after nomination by the Faculty:

Emma Piasecki (School of Law, Northumbria University) Gemma Davies (School of Law, Northumbria University).

[Secretary’s note: As this event was a periodic review, only one external assessor was required to attend the event. However, due to health reasons, the original external assessor was not in a position to confirm whether or not she would be able to be present at the event. An alternative external assessor from the same institution was, therefore, approved, as a “back up” arrangement. In the event, both were able to attend].

A9 Documentary Evidence Base

 Strategic Approval Form and Strategic Approval sign off

 Programme Specification

 Unit Specification Proformas

 Exemption Document (PARM 23) submitted on 30 October 2014

(3)

 Course Development Plan

 Summary CVs of staff teaching on the programme

 PSRB course specification requirements and guidance. A10 Conclusions on Innovation and Good Practice

The Panel identified the following aspects of good practice:

1. With regard to employability; work based learning in the form of Jordan Maxwell (a virtual law firm) was evidenced as innovative and highly effective.

2. Having a designated Pastoral Care Co-ordinator was commended by the Panel; ensuring timely and effective pastoral care and support for students.

3. Student feedback mechanisms are varied and responsive to the student voice. 4. The development and delivery of well-structured online/distance learning was

deemed excellent by students and thus a specific area of good practice. A11 Conclusions on Quality and Standards

The Panel concluded that the intended learning outcomes of the provision were being achieved by students, that the standards of the University’s awards were being maintained and that the provision, as modified, remained current and valid in the light of developing knowledge in the discipline, practice in its operation and developments in teaching and learning.

A12 Summary of Outcome

The Panel recommended:

(i) Continued approval of Legal Practice Course as modified with effect from September 2015.

A13 Condition(s) of Approval

No conditions of approval were set. However, the outcome of a request to Academic Board for exemption from MMU Taught Postgraduate Regulations was awaited.

Secretary’s Note 4 Sept 2015:

As part of the Legal Education and Training Review, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (professional body) have announced that, with effect from September 2018, it will be changing the way in which students are trained to become law professionals. In light of this development, the Head of CASQE has agreed that the course specific regulations for the LPC would not be required at this stage. The position will be reviewed by the University on receipt of information confirming the new arrangements from the SRA.

A14 Deadline(s) for Fulfilment of Condition(s)

(4)

A15 Recommendations

The Programme Team must consider and address explicitly the following recommendation(s) in the course of its annual monitoring processes:

1. In the light of increased competition, to consider how the course marketing strategy can ensure that evidence of the excellent student experience is capitalised upon to maintain market share.

2. In order to meet University expectations in relation to completion the Programme Team should continue to take forward efforts to ensure that students complete in year of study.

3. For MMU, respond more quickly to issues raised by students in relation to the teaching learning environment (e.g. temperature of teaching rooms).

A16 Date of next scheduled review

The next scheduled periodic review of the Legal Practice Course will be held during the Autumn/Spring term of the academic year 2020/21.

(5)

Section C – Not required Section D - For CASQE use only

D1 Date Finalised Report Received 4 September 2015

D2 Date Panel Recommendation &

responses to conditions confirmed by Head of CASQE

4 September 2015

References

Related documents

In our study, consumption of high zinc biofortified wheat flour for 6 months compared to low zinc bioforti- fied wheat resulted in statistically significant reduction in days

La formación de maestros investigadores en el campo del lenguaje y más específicamente en la adquisición de la escritura en educación ini- cial desde una perspectiva

• Follow up with your employer each reporting period to ensure your hours are reported on a regular basis?. • Discuss your progress with

The main activity of Innobuzz is providing training in Information Security, which is delivered to its audience all over the world via Computer Based Training Courses, Onsite

Proposed Framework Form a project team Communicat e objectives to all concerned Confirm the value drivers Define Objective s. Based on the results of data analysis, the

Data sender authenticity Protection service Combined Algorithm selection Selective protection Protection level Combined User-defined Protection level

In addition, results of our exploratory analyses suggest that exposure to specific microbes (e.g., lactobacilli and bifidobacteria) in the maternal vaginal flora may influence

Roboprint Prints 2 pages per second Voltronn Prints 1 page every 2 seconds Vantek Plus Prints 160 pages in 2 minutes DLS Pro Prints 100 pages per minute. Which printer is the