• No results found

MPLS Traffic Engineering with Auto-Bandwidth: Operational Experience and Lessons Learned. Mohan Nanduri Mark Kasten Naoki Kitajima

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "MPLS Traffic Engineering with Auto-Bandwidth: Operational Experience and Lessons Learned. Mohan Nanduri Mark Kasten Naoki Kitajima"

Copied!
12
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

MPLS Traffic Engineering with Auto-Bandwidth:

Operational Experience and Lessons Learned

Mohan Nanduri

Mark Kasten

Naoki Kitajima

(2)

Agenda

Auto-Bandwidth basics and overview

Operational Experience

Lessons Learned

Configuration examples

(3)

MPLS Auto-Bandwidth Basic and

Overview

Automates the process of monitoring and adjusting LSP

bandwidth

MPLS auto-bandwidth uses traffic flows through the

LSP and automatically adjusts the bandwidth based on

the measured traffic flowing through the LSP

LSP bandwidth is adjusted on a per-LSP based on

configurable values

Automatic bandwidth adjustment feature treats each

LSP independently to adjust bandwidth according to

the adjustment frequency configured for the LSP

without regard for any adjustments previously made or

pending for other LSPs

(4)

MPLS Auto-Bandwidth Basic and

Overview

Auto-Bandwidth Calculation mechanism:

– Uses average per-LSP traffic utilization samples and picks the highest measured

bandwidth value observed during the configured interval

– At the end of each interval the highest measured bandwidth value is compared

with the existing LSP bandwidth value

– If the delta is between existing LSP bandwidth and highest measured bandwidth

value chosen is equivalent or greater than adjust-threshold value, the LSP tries to re-signal with the new bandwidth, otherwise the LSP bandwidth remains the same

– Make-before-break mechanism kicks into place and LSP re-signals for the new

bandwidth. Once it’s successful in setting up the LSP, the maximum bandwidth value is reset to zero.

– The above process is repeated for the next adjust-interval

Auto-Bandwidth uses two mechanisms to adjust the bandwidth

– Adjust-Interval

(5)

MPLS Auto-Bandwidth With

Adjust-Interval

• The highest measured bandwidth value is 100 Mbps for a given adjust-interval

period, the LSP is signaled with 100 Mbps and its reset to zero.

• As the new adjust-interval starts, the highest measured bandwidth value is 50

Mbps. LSP is signaled with 50 Mbps if the adjust-threshold value is met.

• If for any reason the LSP cannot signal 50 Mbps, the LSP’s bandwidth will remain at

(6)

MPLS Auto-Bandwidth With Overflow

• If the highest measured bandwidth value is higher than the current LSP signaled

bandwidth value.

• The delta between highest measured bandwidth value and current LSP signaled

bandwidth value is greater than or equal to configured adjust-threshold value.

• The number of occurrences must reach the configured overflow count

consecutively. Overflow counter resets to the configured overflow value if the bandwidth decreases during one the sampling cycles.

• LSP is signaled with the new bandwidth value before the configured

adjust-interval.

(7)

Benefits of Auto-Bandwidth

Network can react faster to sudden burst of

traffic in near real-time and not rely on

manually intervention

Effective use of bandwidth resources by

minimizing the over-subscription/padding of

LSP bandwidth

Maximizes the usage of available bandwidth

and optimizes the network effectively to signal

better paths

(8)

Why auto-bandwidth for us?

Extensive use of traffic engineering using

offline bandwidth calculation and adjusting

bandwidth based on historical traffic data

Lagging behind bandwidth adjustments

(9)

Operational Experience

Auto-bandwidth deployed since early 2009 globally

Some skepticism initially letting the device automatically adjust bandwidth

– Engineers who came from ISP background and were used to offline

bandwidth calculation

Worked fairly well so far

– Ran into some issues early on

– Smear timers not spacing LSPs properly – Bloated traffic stats used to setup LSPs

Phased rollout of auto-bandwidth globally

Extensive analysis was performed on network after auto-bandwidth was

introduced to optimize

– Significant churn by smaller sized LSPs

– Tiered LSP model was introduce to reduce churn

RSVP interface subscriptions were modified to account spike in traffic

Sudden spike in traffic was still a issue

(10)

Lessons Learned

Significant amount of time was spent to understand internals, was

tough to get info initially from vendor

Many hours were spent testing the feature, it was a big change on

the network, test all the available knob thoroughly, ran into

multiple issues

Thorough planning and training made the deployment very smooth

Correlation scripts to check traffic stats and MPLS bandwidth setup

Show commands lacks historical bandwidth adjustment

information, have to glean information from multiple log files

Multiple enhancements have been submitted to display info to make

troubleshooting easier, to name a few: show previous bandwidth

adjusted values, maximum bandwidth ever used and counter to keep

track of bandwidth adjustments.

(11)

Configuration

groups { autobw_lsp_setup { protocols { mpls { label-switched-path <*> { ldp-tunneling; soft-preemption;

admin-group include-any [ gold]; adaptive; auto-bandwidth { adjust-interval 900; adjust-threshold 10; minimum-bandwidth 1m; maximum-bandwidth 2g; } } } } autobw_lsp_setup_1M_profile { protocols { mpls { label-switched-path <*> { ldp-tunneling;

admin-group include-any [ gold ]; adaptive; auto-bandwidth { adjust-interval 900; adjust-threshold 50; minimum-bandwidth 1m; maximum-bandwidth 50m; } } } } } } mpls { statistics {

file mpls_stats.log size 1m files 10; interval 60; auto-bandwidth; } label-switched-path rtr1-to-rtr2 { apply-groups autobw_lsp_setup; to 10.1.1.2;

admin-group exclude [bad]; }

label-switched-path rtr1-to-rtr3 {

apply-groups autobw_lsp_setup_1M; to 10.1.1.3;

admin-group exclude [bad]; }

(12)

Show Commands

mnanduri@sn1-96cb-1a> show mpls lsp ingress extensive Ingress LSP: 119 sessions

10.1.1.1

From: 10.1.1.2, State: Up, ActiveRoute: 86, LSPname: rtr1-to-rtr2 ActivePath: standard_path (primary)

LSPtype: Static Configured LoadBalance: Random Autobandwidth

MinBW: 5Mbps MaxBW: 250Mbps

AdjustTimer: 900 secs AdjustThreshold: 50%

Max AvgBW util: 716.416kbps, Bandwidth Adjustment in 806 second(s). Overflow limit: 0, Overflow sample count: 0

Encoding type: Packet, Switching type: Packet, GPID: IPv4 *Primary standard_path State: Up

Priorities: 3 3

Bandwidth: 7.53702Mbps OptimizeTimer: 900 SmartOptimizeTimer: 180

Include Any: transpacific favored core Exclude: transatlantic Reoptimization in 226 second(s).

mohan@sat-96c-poc-netwk-1a# run show log mpls-new.stats Jan 2 04:53:33 trace_on: Tracing to "/var/log/mpls-new.stats" started

HiPri-96c-to-16c (LSP ID 2, Tunnel ID 23040) 18663575116 pkt 9145151806840 Byte 49709 pps 24357859 Bps Reserved Bw 0 Bps 96c-to-16c-1 (LSP ID 2, Tunnel ID 23044) 54876339 pkt 26889406110 Byte 0 pps 0 Bps Reserved Bw 0 Bps

Jan 2 04:54:33 Total 34 sessions: 7 success, 0 fail, 27 ignored

HiPri-96c-to-16c (LSP ID 2, Tunnel ID 23040) 18669639725 pkt 9148123465250 Byte 51366 pps 25169789 Bps Reserved Bw 0 Bps 96c-to-16c-1 (LSP ID 2, Tunnel ID 23044) 54876339 pkt 26889406110 Byte 0 pps 0 Bps Reserved Bw 0 Bps

References

Related documents

Primary bone marrow macrophages (BMMs) from control and complete long-form leptin receptor (ObRb) knockout (KO) mice were stimulated with 100nM leptin and 10 -7 to 10 -.. M

2201 1325_06_2000_c1 Applications: Enterprise Backbone Applications: Enterprise Backbone • MPLS provides Scalability IP services Traffic engineering • Benefits Flexibility

In order to gain a better understanding of MPLS technology and its usefulness to traffic engineering and bandwidth management, we are developing our own MPLS implementation for

The preliminary objectives were to test the effects of relative and fixed bandwidth allocation to classes using WFQ and CBQ inside the MPLS cloud for full-blast and bursty

MPLS (Multiprotocol label switching) as a traffic- engineering tool has emerged as an elegant solution to meet the bandwidth management and service requirements for

19 DELA CRUZ MARIZ SABACAN NUEVA ECIJA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &amp; TECHNOLOGY-CABANATUAN). 20 DELA CRUZ MARK JAYSON BAUTISTA

In this paper we focus on Bandwidth guaranteed paths and we are introducing a MPLS Routing algorithm called Bandwidth guaranteed MPLS Routing Algorithm (BGMRA) is provided to get

low-latency paths and sufficient new capacity to support basic video communications. IP m continued, but the new network did not provide the levels of QoS needed for