• No results found

Case Farm: McMahon's E-Z Acres

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Case Farm: McMahon's E-Z Acres"

Copied!
37
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Cornell’s Winter Dairy Management 2006

Enhance Dairy Profitability: Achieve Balance Between Crops and Cows

Case Farm:

Case Farm:

McMAHON’S

McMAHON’S

E

E--Z

Z

ACRES

ACRES

HOMER, New York

(2)

Farm overview

Farm overview

ƒƒ McMahon’s EZMcMahon’s EZ--AcresAcres

ƒƒ Located in Homer NYLocated in Homer NY O d b t b th O d b t b th

ƒƒ Owned by two brothersOwned by two brothers

ƒƒ Soils are a mix ofSoils are a mix of

ƒƒ Deep wellDeep well--drained gravel drained gravel

ƒƒ Valley floorValley floor Edie

ƒƒ Valley floorValley floor

ƒƒ Aquifer for over 50,000 peopleAquifer for over 50,000 people

ƒƒ Shallow, poorly drained, acidic clay’sShallow, poorly drained, acidic clay’s

ƒƒ 675 cows and typically 505 heifers675 cows and typically 505 heifers

Edie

yp y yp y

ƒƒ 6 row free6 row free--stall built in 1995stall built in 1995

ƒƒ Heifer facilities (weaned calves through breeding) built in Heifer facilities (weaned calves through breeding) built in 1996

1996

D f iliti b ilt i 2000 D f iliti b ilt i 2000

Pete

ƒƒ Dry cow facilities built in 2000Dry cow facilities built in 2000

ƒƒ Bred Heifer Facility (with pasture system) in 2005Bred Heifer Facility (with pasture system) in 2005

ƒƒ DEC protected brownDEC protected brown--trout stream flows through all of valley trout stream flows through all of valley land

land

Mike

land land

(3)

1997:

1997:

Hi t i l P

ti

Hi t i l P

ti

Historical Perspective

Historical Perspective

ƒƒ

Consolidated from 4 aging

Consolidated from 4 aging

tie

tie--stall barns in ‘95

stall barns in ‘95

ƒƒ

Average of 515 cows in

Average of 515 cows in

Average of 515 cows in

Average of 515 cows in

new 6

new 6--row free stall barn

row free stall barn

ƒƒ

New double 14 parallel

New double 14 parallel

parlor

parlor

parlor

parlor

ƒƒ

20,162 lbs. shipped per

20,162 lbs. shipped per

cow

cow

ƒƒ

Grow herd capacity from

Grow herd capacity from

within

(4)

1995 1997 1996 2000 2005 1997

(5)

1997: Major Issues

1997: Major Issues

ƒƒ

Located in environmentally

Located in environmentally--sensitive area

sensitive area

ƒƒ

50%+ of tillable land over sole

50%+ of tillable land over sole--source aquifer

source aquifer

ƒƒ

50%+ of tillable land over sole

50%+ of tillable land over sole--source aquifer

source aquifer

ƒƒ

Only 10

Only 10--14 days of manure storage

14 days of manure storage

ƒƒ

Perception: Land insufficient to provide

Perception: Land insufficient to provide

ƒƒ

Perception: Land insufficient to provide

Perception: Land insufficient to provide

enough forage

enough forage

ƒƒ

Homegrown forage at 43%

Homegrown forage at 43%

ƒƒ

Bunk space inadequate

Bunk space inadequate

ƒƒ

Bunk space inadequate

Bunk space inadequate

ƒƒ

Purchased feed costs high

Purchased feed costs high

ƒƒ

Production and herd health problems

Production and herd health problems

ƒƒ

Production and herd health problems

Production and herd health problems

ƒƒ

Milk per cow stagnant at 68 lbs/cow

Milk per cow stagnant at 68 lbs/cow

(6)

View South to Homer

Houses/Fields/Manure Houses/Fields/Manure

(7)

BEGINNING WITH CUNMPS

BEGINNING WITH CUNMPS

ƒƒ

Agreed to participate in early 1997

Agreed to participate in early 1997

ƒƒ

Hoped to gain advantage for environmental

Hoped to gain advantage for environmental

d

l t

i

(CAFO)

d

l t

i

(CAFO)

and regulatory issues (CAFO)

and regulatory issues (CAFO)

ƒƒ

Many unanticipated benefits

Many unanticipated benefits

ƒƒ

“Precision Farming” led to improvements

“Precision Farming” led to improvements

in every enterprise of the dairy.

(8)

ECONOMIC IMPACT

ECONOMIC IMPACT

GROWING OUR WAY TO

GROWING OUR WAY TO

GROWING OUR WAY TO

GROWING OUR WAY TO

PROFITABILITY

PROFITABILITY

ƒƒ

In 1997, debt per cow was increasing post expansion.

In 1997, debt per cow was increasing post expansion.

Bad.

Bad.

ƒƒ

Benchmark indicators of profitability below desired

Benchmark indicators of profitability below desired

levels. Bad.

levels. Bad.

ƒƒ

High fixed costs demanded increased productivity per

High fixed costs demanded increased productivity per

cow

cow

without increasing debt load

without increasing debt load

ƒƒ

Rigorous budgeting process with per cow & cwt. targets

Rigorous budgeting process with per cow & cwt. targets

C iti

l “ t

t h” t

t

t i 2001

d b

d f

C iti

l “ t

t h” t

t

t i 2001

d b

d f

ƒƒ

Critical “stretch” targets met in 2001 and beyond for

Critical “stretch” targets met in 2001 and beyond for

feed costs, hired labor and machinery cost.

(9)

Results

Results

ƒƒ

Debt per cow decreasing.

Debt per cow decreasing.

Good.

Good.

9

1997- $4700; 2003 - $3187; 2004 - $2922; 2005 - $3220 (

Ç

Heifer Barn, Chopper)

ƒƒ

Benchmark indicators of profitability well

Benchmark indicators of profitability well

above desired levels.

above desired levels.

Good, but hope to

Good, but hope to

get back into DFBS top 20% in 2006.

get back into DFBS top 20% in 2006.

ƒƒ

Total productivity increasing while

Total productivity increasing while

controlling debt.

(10)

??

Questions?

Questions?

(11)
(12)

24 hr. Sol. P Lactic Acetic Butyric

EZ Acres Forage Lab Results – Key Feeding and Storage Quality Factors

y Date DM% NDF% dNDF% CP% %of CP Acid% Acid% Acid%

Grass 4/06/05 25.9 51.7 48 25.7 53 6/14/05 46.5 58.2 55 13 45 2.25 1.1 0 8/18/05 38.6 57.3 18.5 48.6 9/23/05 29.8 49.6 53 18.9 57 5.13 2.17 0.03 11/14/05 90(Hay) 63.6 16 19 Legume 2/1/05 28 9 42 2 37 24 8 63 2/1/05 28.9 42.2 37 24.8 63 8/18/05 50.8 45 47 (30hr) 18.1 43.9 9/23/05 58.2 36.8 59 25.2 47 1.6 .65 0

Corn Silage Starch% NEL

9/23/05 31.3 40.8 36 32.2 .78 6.31 1.6 0 11/08/05 33 2 43 6 32 32 2 72 1 95 26 0 11/08/05 33.2 43.6 32 32.2 .72 1.95 .26 0 1/04/06 31.4 40.4 42 32.3 .80 7.5 3.49 0

(13)

Ration objectives

Ration objectives

ƒƒ

Maximize forage intake

Maximize forage intake

ƒƒ

Goal: 1% bodyweight as NDF capacity (but not at

Goal: 1% bodyweight as NDF capacity (but not at

ƒƒ

Goal: 1% bodyweight as NDF capacity (but not at

Goal: 1% bodyweight as NDF capacity (but not at

the expense of “Rumen Healthy Income over

the expense of “Rumen Healthy Income over

Feed Cost)

Feed Cost)))

ƒƒ

E.g. 1400 pound cow, 1% BW = 14 pounds NDF. If

E.g. 1400 pound cow, 1% BW = 14 pounds NDF. If

forage is 50% NDF, she can eat 28 pounds of forage. If

forage is 50% NDF, she can eat 28 pounds of forage. If

60% NDF she can only eat 23 pounds

60% NDF she can only eat 23 pounds

60% NDF, she can only eat 23 pounds.

60% NDF, she can only eat 23 pounds.

ƒƒ

Entire herd is currently about 0.94%

Entire herd is currently about 0.94%

ƒƒ

Need inventory, quality and a little

Need inventory, quality and a little

luck with weather

luck with weather

(high dNDF)

(high dNDF)

to achieve this!

to achieve this!

(14)

STAYING THE COURSE:

STAYING THE COURSE:

RESULTS OF HIGH FORAGE DIET

RESULTS OF HIGH FORAGE DIET

Herd struggled to recover from acidosis thru 2001, but

Herd struggled to recover from acidosis thru 2001, but

1997

1997

Today

Today

1997

1997

Today

Today

Herd Average #

Herd Average #

g

g

20,165*

20,165*

,,

26,000*

26,000*

26,000

26,000

Cull Rate

Cull Rate

44 %

44 %

33%**

33%**

Purchased Feed

Purchased Feed

(concentrate)

(concentrate)

5.45/cwt

5.45/cwt

4.65/cwt

4.65/cwt

*3X, No bST, shipped *3X, No bST, shipped

**Full barn, many dairy sales **Full barn, many dairy sales

IOPCFC

IOPCFC

($13.50 Milk)

($13.50 Milk)

(Income Over Purchased

(Income Over Purchased

$1623/cow

$1623/cow

$2301/cow

$2301/cow

(Income Over Purchased

(Income Over Purchased

Concentrate Feed Costs)

Concentrate Feed Costs)

(15)

Impact

Impact--Rations

Rations

Proportion of diet

Purchased Feed Homegrown purchased Cost Per cwt

1997 42.9% 57.1% $5.45 1999 48.9% 51.1% $4.06 2000 47.5% 52.5% $4.55 2001 55.0% 45.0% $3.57 2002 59.1% 40.9% $3.43 2005 61% 39% $4.65 52.1% 68% 142% 05 vs. 97 142% 68% 52.1% 05 vs. 97 142% 68% 52.1%85.3% 05 vs. 97 142% 68% 52.1% 05 vs. 97

(16)

HERD HEALTH IMPACT

HERD HEALTH IMPACT

Herd health

Herd health key

key to growing cow

to growing cow

numbers without adding debt

numbers without adding debt

numbers without adding debt

numbers without adding debt

ƒƒ Fresh cows leaving herd <40 DIM: Fresh cows leaving herd <40 DIM:

ƒƒ

1998 = 9.4%

1998 = 9.4%

ƒƒ

2005 = 2.4%

2005 = 2.4%

ƒƒ Barn at full capacityBarn at full capacity someone goessomeone goes

ƒƒ Barn at full capacity Barn at full capacity –– someone goessomeone goes

ƒƒ Milk production at 129% of incremental Milk production at 129% of incremental improvement start in 2000

improvement start in 2000

ƒƒ Decrease in daily fluctuations from Decrease in daily fluctuations from pounds to tenths.

pounds to tenths.

9Was 2 3 lbs ; Now 0 2 0 3 lbs !

(17)

??

Questions?

Questions?

(18)
(19)

FIRST STEP: FIELD CROPS

FIRST STEP: FIELD CROPS

ƒƒ

Match the crop to the soil

Match the crop to the soil

resources.

resources.

ƒƒ

Low yield fields rotated to

Low yield fields rotated to

Intensively Managed Grass

Intensively Managed Grass

Intensively Managed Grass

Intensively Managed Grass

ƒƒ 17 tons/acre eased forage 17 tons/acre eased forage inventory concerns

inventory concerns inventory concerns inventory concerns

ƒƒ Voracious “sinks” for Voracious “sinks” for liquid manure

liquid manure 9Was “not corn or alfalfa, it’s a weed”! ƒƒ 95% of original IMGs 95% of original IMGs

continue high yield continue high yield

9200 Acres in first year

980% Reedscanary, 20% Orchard

94 appl. Manure, 12,000 gallons per year

9200 Lbs. urea @ greenup + 150 lbs. post-harvest

(20)

FIRST STEP: FIELD CROPS

FIRST STEP: FIELD CROPS

Silage corn varieties carefully

Silage corn varieties carefully

matched to soil/elevation

matched to soil/elevation\\

ƒƒ

Planting dates & maturities used to

Planting dates & maturities used to

l

h

h

i d

l

h

h

i d

lengthen harvest window

lengthen harvest window

C

t

t

t

t h d t

t i

t

C

t

t

t

t h d t

t i

t

ƒƒ

Corn starter custom matched to nutrient

Corn starter custom matched to nutrient

levels

levels

9Was 200 lbs. 6:24:24

9Now whatever called for of 20:20:0

ƒƒ

PSNTs used to assess supplemental N

PSNTs used to assess supplemental N

needs

(21)

LESSONS IN FORAGE QUALITY

LESSONS IN FORAGE QUALITY

ƒƒ

Quantity is good but quality is crucial

Quantity is good but quality is crucial

ƒƒ

Clear quality goals

Clear quality goals

ƒƒ NDF based, not proteinNDF based, not protein

ƒƒ

Cutting intervals

Cutting intervals

9300 A grass (2 days) Æ400 A Alfalfa (2 days)

9Grass start May 25 + 30D + 30D + 30D

9Alfalfa start May 30 + 35D + 35D + watch growth

Cutting intervals

Cutting intervals

ƒƒ

Field drying time

Field drying time

ƒƒ

Harvesting quickly

Harvesting quickly

ƒƒ

Apply recommended fertilizer amounts

Apply recommended fertilizer amounts

9Alfalfa start May 30 + 35D + 35D + watch growth

pp y

pp y

ƒƒ

Investment in SP Harvester with kernel processor

Investment in SP Harvester with kernel processor

ƒƒ

Custom mowing, harvesting & hauling at peak

Custom mowing, harvesting & hauling at peak

times

(22)

Adequate Iron?

Machinery Inventory EZ Acres (700 Acres Hay Crop, 605 Acres Corn)

Tillage

-Disk Ripper (min. tillage) -Offset Disk

Chopping

-2005 forced upgrade to JD 7300 (385 HP)

(center piv t n 13’ pickup)

Planting

-(Custom air seeder) -Cultipacker

(center pivot on 13 pickup)

Hauling

3 str i ht ri dump trucks p

-12 Row Corn Planter (3-way flex for hills)

Mowing

-3 straight rig dump trucks -1 dumping trailer

P kin Mowing

-(2) 15’ Pull Behind Rotary plus 2 more custom

-(2) Custom mowers h lf lf Packing -JD 9400 @ 56,000 Lbs. (12 wheels – 6/axel) -9’ Swath – Alfalfa

(less with grasses)

Merging

Other

-5’ x 5’ Round Baler

-Occasional Rented Bagger

Merging

-(2) Mergers 3 Æ 1

(in 1st Crop)

(23)

??

Questions?

Questions?

(24)
(25)

H

t I t

t

9

350 A

(2 d

)

Æ

350 A Alf lf (2 d

)

Harvest Intent

9

350 A grass (2 days)

Æ

350 A Alfalfa (2 days)

9

Grass start May 25 + 30D + 30D + 30D

9

Alf lf t t M 30 35D 35D t h

th

(26)

Adequate Iron?

Machinery Inventory EZ Acres (700 Acres Hay Crop, 605 Acres Corn)

Tillage

-Disk Ripper (min. tillage) -Offset Disk

Chopping

-2005 forced upgrade to JD 7300 (385 HP)

(center piv t n 13’ pickup)

Planting

-(Custom air seeder) -Cultipacker

(center pivot on 13 pickup)

Hauling

3 str i ht ri dump trucks p

-12 Row Corn Planter (3-way flex for hills)

Mowing

-3 straight rig dump trucks -1 dumping trailer

P kin Mowing

-(2) 15’ Pull Behind Rotary plus 2 more custom

-(2) Custom mowers h lf lf Packing -JD 9400 @ 56,000 Lbs. (12 wheels – 6/axel) -9’ Swath – Alfalfa

(less with grasses)

Merging

Other

-5’ x 5’ Round Baler

-Occasional Rented Bagger

Merging

-(2) Mergers 3 Æ 1

(in 1st Crop)

(27)
(28)

??

Questions?

Questions?

(29)
(30)

FEED STORAGE:

FEED STORAGE:

A PROBLEM FROM SUCCESS

A PROBLEM FROM SUCCESS

ƒƒ

Forage resulted in overload on existing bunks

Forage resulted in overload on existing bunks

Forage resulted in overload on existing bunks

Forage resulted in overload on existing bunks

ƒƒ

Bags were short

Bags were short--term band

Bags were short

Bags were short term band

term band--aid

term band aid

aid

aid

ƒƒ

Started segregating by type, not cutting

Started segregating by type, not cutting

g

g

g

g

g y yp ,

g y yp ,

g

g

ƒƒ

Build flexibility into your feed storage system

Build flexibility into your feed storage system

y

y

y

y

g

g

y

y

(e.g. open ended bunks)

(e.g. open ended bunks)

(31)

Feed Center and view of “telephone pole high” corn silage bunk in use before new setup across the road. silage bunk in use before new setup across the road. Silo is now part of well-divided hay crop storage.

“PackMaster Pete” risking life and limb on over PackMaster Pete risking life and limb on over -height bunk. Next slide shows much better situation with new bunk.

(32)

25’ Center Height

New Corn Silage Bunker – Stretch goal for 2006 is to feed no new crop corn silage until after the first of the year.

(33)

Newly Opened Corn Silage Bunker Slope (2004 & 2005)

y

p

g

p (

)

11.0 lbs./ft

3

(2004)

11.8 lbs./ft

3

(2005)

90’W x 200’L x 13’ side wall

(34)

Alfalfa Bunker

14.6 lbs./ft

3

60’W x 200’L x 12’ side wall

60 W x 200 L x 12 side wall

(35)

Grass Bunker

Grass Bunker

14.4 lbs./ft

3

(36)

Pregnancy

Rate

Mycotoxin problem

y

p

discovered through

trouble shooting sharp

dip in conception rate.

Took several 21 day

cycles to play through.

Record summer heat is

no picnic either!

(37)

??

Questions?

Questions?

References

Related documents

In general, information should be collected at least for the following standard economic variables to enable basic analysis of the environment industry, as far as possible broken

The paper finishes with a comparison of field based evaluation method and recommendations for usability studies to test mobile map applications.. BACKGROUND

Evaluates the inverse of the noncentral beta cumulative distribution function

Simulink Model of wind energy conversion system as shown in appendix Fig. The induction machine equipped with wind turbine act as induction generator. The output

There are three possibilities to produce L-FOS: (i) bacterial levansucrases are producing high amount of levan and some L-FOS from sucrose, (ii) levan can be hydrolyzed to FOS

Based on the opinion of those who deal directly with medications, we conclude that medical experts consider it reasonable to utilize the systemic transdermal

c 5 μg/mL ESC and 25 μM SB432542 significantly reversed EMT proteins induced by TGF‑β, inhibiting expression of phosphorylation of Smad2 and Vimentin, enhancing expression

The services denied are the processor time consumed in examining the undesired messages and rejecting them, and the loss of network thruput or increased delay due to the