• No results found

The Financial Reporting Framework New Direction! Right Direction?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "The Financial Reporting Framework New Direction! Right Direction?"

Copied!
16
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

The Financial Reporting

Framework

New Direction! Right Direction?

(2)

What do we have today?

New Zealand legislation

(3)

The need for a "future-proof" structure

FAIRNESS TIMELINESS ACCOUNTABILITY ACCESSIBILITY

Public Accountability Economic Significance Separation of

Ownership and Management

PRIMARY FINANCIAL REPORTING PRINCIPLE

Future changes in markets Future changes in user needs Future changes in international standards Future changes in New Zealand Government

(4)

What do the proposals set out to achieve?

“The main objective of the review is to produce a

financial reporting system that works

efficiently

(5)

Overview of the discussion documents

The MED Proposals

• 81 pages

• 25,310 words

• 37 questions for respondents

• 10 parts, covering the objectives of the review,

problem definition, statutory responsibilities, financial

reporting principles and their application to the different sectors identified, and other issues noted

The ASRB Proposals

• 66 pages

• 26,235 words

• 19 questions for respondents

• 6 chapters, covering the general framework for the application of accounting and assurance standards and the application of this framework to the different sectors, as well as related issues and comments

(6)

Assurance framework Financial reporting framework User needs

The user-needs principle

Taxpayers & ratepayers Donors & members Investors Shareholders/ owners Security/ return on investment Stewardship of investment Economic impact Use of donations/ service delivery/ value for money

Use of public money/ service delivery Not-for- profit Profit- oriented Public sector General public

(7)

Sector specific and tier-based approach

Sectoral Specific Basis

For-profit

Public benefit

Public sector Not-for-profit Tier 1 Tier 1 Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 2 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 3 INDICATORS Public accountability Owner/ management separation Economic significance

(8)

Primary concerns?

• The “black hole” that exists from not having a third tier for approx. 500,000 profit-oriented entities

• What fills company reporting in that space and who should be responsible for developing it?

– Not convinced the Australian, “special purpose financial reporting” solution is the best way to go

• Free form

• Positive reference to a framework (everything except for)

• Cherry picking (taken these standards from the framework)

(9)

Financial reporting

• Companies are by definition risk-taking enterprises; there needs to be accountability for the privilege

– To file or not to file; that is the question?

• The number of accounting “rule books” that will need to be put in place

(10)

Assurance

Constructive and useful developments:

– Acceptance of the important role of “review”, but do directors clearly understand what is involved?

– Opt-in and opt-out provisions

– Auditor registration What’s missing?

– The lack of consideration of agreed upon

procedures when considering the “accountability” requirements of smaller entities

(11)

The way forward for small companies …

• For Tier 2 companies: IFRS for SMEs

– Rather than an “Australasian” Differential Reporting solution on the grounds of:

• reduced disclosure

• reduced maintenance

• international comparability

• a lack of resources, and

• a robust methodology to support the ongoing development of differential reporting

(12)

The way forward for small companies …

• For “Tier 3” companies:

– Develop a cut down version of IFRS for SMEs to satisfy tax reporting (ie IR 4 and IR 10) needs

– Link this basis of reporting to the Government’s Standard Business Reporting (SBR) initiative for efficient and effective filing with Government

• Encourage comparability and benchmarking

(13)

Closing remarks

• Both Discussion Papers are good, but there are some gaps

• It’s clear “old” NZ GAAP with its Financial Reporting

Standards and NZ IFRS as it currently stands needs to be replaced

• New Zealand needs to have internationally recognised processes to develop financial reporting standards and assurance standards

(14)

What should you do next?

Read

Discuss

Consider

(15)

Any questions

or comments?

(16)

Contact details

AUCKLAND OFFICE

Level 4, Grant Thornton House, 152 Fanshawe Street, Telephone +649 308 2570 PO Box 1961, Auckland 1140, NEW ZEALAND Facsimile +649 309 4892

WELLINGTON OFFICE

Level 13, AXA Centre, 80 The Terrace Telephone +644 474 8500 PO Box 10712, Wellington 6143, NEW ZEALAND Facsimile +644 474 8509

CHRISTCHURCH OFFICE

Level 9, Anthony Harper Building, 47 Cathedral Square, Telephone +643 379 9580 PO Box 2099, Christchurch 8140, NEW ZEALAND Facsimile +643 366 3720

References

Related documents

Directors before appealing to the Department of Financial Services. If such member insurer is aggrieved by the final action or decision of the Board, or if the Board does not act

Compare the efficacy of a 3-product salicylic acid (SA) acne regimen versus a positive control regimen (2.5% benzoyl peroxide; BP) and a placebo regimen for improving acne vulgaris

Figure 5: Impact of 1 Standard Error shock to Chinese equity prices using trade weights from 1996, and 2012 plus the indirect effect 2012 weight matrix.. Solid lines represent

As partner agencies with an interest in youth health and wellbeing, our purpose is to increase awareness, dispel myths and reduce the harms associated with youth cannabis use

To evaluate the influence of technical characteristics such as edge-gluing and gap size in the cross layers, on the measurement of rolling shear modulus and strength of cross

Thermal Performance Analysis of Solar Dryer Integrated with Heat Energy Storage System and a Low-Cost Parabolic Solar Dish Concentrator for Food Preservation1. Wenceslaus

contrast between Marx and Virilio is somewhat modified by the fact that Marx, too, attributed a fairly significant role to technology in the globalisation of economy: he saw

Referee for journals: Journal of Applied Probability, Journal of Communications and Networks, Mathematical Methods of Eperations Research, Operations Research, Operations