• No results found

Permanent Magnet Motor concept

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Permanent Magnet Motor concept"

Copied!
13
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

www.magnetmotor.at | Dietmar Hohl, Linz/AUSTRIA | Jan. 2010 | Rev. D | Page 1 / 13

Permanent Magnet Motor

concept

(2)

www.magnetmotor.at | Dietmar Hohl, Linz/AUSTRIA | Jan. 2010 | Rev. D | Page 2 / 13 First we begin by taking two triangular magnets.

These magnets are 45 – 45 – 90 degree triangles.

Notice the North Pole and the South Pole are reversed on the magnets.

Now see the magnetic flux lines between them.

Notice the lines between them begin from and go back into the same magnet. These are the lines of magnetic repulsion.

Now move the magnets so that the north and south poles face each other.

See the lines which pass from bottom of one magnet to the bottom of the other. These are the lines of magnetic attraction.

(3)

www.magnetmotor.at | Dietmar Hohl, Linz/AUSTRIA | Jan. 2010 | Rev. D | Page 3 / 13 Now let us stack up five magnets on both sides.

| ROTOR | STATOR |

There are lines going from the top magnet to the bottom magnet on each side. This will not happen when we arrange the magnets in a circle.

A circle does not have a first and last magnet.

If we look closely at the middle magnet, we can see what will happen inside the circle.

If the magnets on the right remain stationary and the magnets on the left are allowed to rotate, the magnets on the right will begin to push the magnets on the left away. We will now watch as the magnets on the left move through 10 different positions. Notice that there never occur any lines of attraction.

(4)

www.magnetmotor.at | Dietmar Hohl, Linz/AUSTRIA | Jan. 2010 | Rev. D | Page 4 / 13 Position# 01

| ROTOR | STATOR |

Position# 02

(5)

www.magnetmotor.at | Dietmar Hohl, Linz/AUSTRIA | Jan. 2010 | Rev. D | Page 5 / 13 Position# 04

Position# 05

(6)

www.magnetmotor.at | Dietmar Hohl, Linz/AUSTRIA | Jan. 2010 | Rev. D | Page 6 / 13 Position# 07

| ROTOR | STATOR |

Position# 08

(7)

www.magnetmotor.at | Dietmar Hohl, Linz/AUSTRIA | Jan. 2010 | Rev. D | Page 7 / 13 Position# 10

| ROTOR | STATOR |

Not only is the repulsion always greater then the attraction, but also the repulsion is in a certain direction. If we do this with flat magnets, the repulsion will always be at 180 degrees. There will be no movement.

However, when we do this with triangular magnets, the magnetic lines between the north and south poles are at an angle, and this will push the opposing magnets at an angle less then 180 degrees.

(8)

www.magnetmotor.at | Dietmar Hohl, Linz/AUSTRIA | Jan. 2010 | Rev. D | Page 8 / 13 The used magnet for Test# 01 & 02:

material /quality: Neodym (NdFeB) / N40 flux density: 1,25 Tesla = 12500 Gauss product of energy: 310 kJ/m3

volume: 155,687 cm3 weight: 1162,3 g / 2,562 lb stored energy: 48263,125 mJ (mWs)

(9)

www.magnetmotor.at | Dietmar Hohl, Linz/AUSTRIA | Jan. 2010 | Rev. D | Page 9 / 13 Test# 01 S t a r t | STATOR | ROTOR |

Simulation: FEMM

= 16 mm

gap ROTOR / Stator = 1mm

ROTOR

x-axis y-axis

(10)

www.magnetmotor.at | Dietmar Hohl, Linz/AUSTRIA | Jan. 2010 | Rev. D | Page 10 / 13 Test# 01 Result Move (mm) x-axis 1 -14,094 N -14,094 2 -12,307 N -12,307 3 -8,516 N -8,516 4 -4,513 N -4,513 5 -0,761 N -0,761 6 2,533 N 2,533 7 4,858 N 4,858 8 6,377 N 6,377 9 7,015 N 7,015 10 6,789 N 6,789 11 5,559 N 5,559 12 3,336 N 3,336 13 0,703 N 0,703 14 -3,253 N 3,253 15 -7,273 N 7,273 16 -11,372 N 11,372 energy balance LOSS : 40,191 N WIN : 59,068 N DIFFERENCE : 18,877 N WIN !

Note:The result is not 100% correct. An integration with the x-axis must be also done!

Chart of two cycles.

| Linz, 09.Jan.2010

attraction LOSS

repulsion WIN

(11)

www.magnetmotor.at | Dietmar Hohl, Linz/AUSTRIA | Jan. 2010 | Rev. D | Page 11 / 13 In the Test# 02 the ROTOR-magnets are balanced exactly against the Stator-magnets.

So all y-axis strengths are always be zero. ;-)

Test# 02 S t a r t | STATOR | ROTOR | STATOR | Simulation: FEMM = 16 mm gap ROTOR/Stator = 1 mm ROTOR x-axis y-axis

(12)

www.magnetmotor.at | Dietmar Hohl, Linz/AUSTRIA | Jan. 2010 | Rev. D | Page 12 / 13 Test# 02 Result move (mm) x-axis 1 -24,413 N -24,413 2 -21,280 N -21,280 3 -13,644 N -13,644 4 -5,596 N -5,596 5 1,867 N 1,867 6 8,067 N 8,067 7 12,607 N 12,607 8 15,631 N 15,631 9 16,995 N 16,995 10 16,414 N 16,414 11 14,034 N 14,034 12 9,816 N 9,816 13 3,925 N 3,925 14 -3,414 N 3,414 15 -11,848 N 11,848 16 -20,060 N 20,060 energy balance LOSS : 64,933 N WIN : 134,678 N DIFFERENCE : 69,745 N WIN!

Happy Flux, Dietmar ;-)

| Linz, 10.Jan.2010 Englisch: http://www.magnetmotor.at/wissen/PMagnetMotor_e.pdf German: http://www.magnetmotor.at/wissen/PMagnetMotor_de.pdf Test# 03 Dreieck_A_N40 Setup: http://www.magnetmotor.at/wissen/Setup_Dreieck_A_N40_e.pdf Data: http://www.magnetmotor.at/wissen/PMM_EB_Dreieck_A_N40x_e.pdf Chart: http://www.magnetmotor.at/wissen/PMM_EB_Dreieck_A_N40_chart_e.pdf Project: http://www.magnetmotor.at/wissen/dreiecke_A_N40.rar

A factor of 1:3 LOSS/WIN seems possible (!) lg Dietmar ;-)

| Linz, 14.Jan.2010

attraction LOSS

repulsion WIN

(13)

www.magnetmotor.at | Dietmar Hohl, Linz/AUSTRIA | Jan. 2010 | Rev. D | Page 13 / 13 HQ-Simulation Deieck_04 (70,5MB):

http://www.file-upload.net/download-2207973/ani_dreieck_04.wmv.html

F&E-Sim Video (Dreieck_04):

http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=102586055

Our special thanks to Stan for his support of correct FEMM -Simulations. ;-) Pls have a small look under his Hompage: http://qdmechanic.com/

References

Related documents

As the name suggests Axial Flux Permanent Magnet (AFPM) machines utilise Permanent Magnets (PM) in their design and the direction of the magnetic flux flow within AFPM is parallel

Upon using 4 pole permanent magnets instead of 2 poles we get following results in coreless type of motors. It is required to mention that these

The hard magnetic properties of MnAl magnets originate from the magnetic phase which is a metastable phase that can be obtained either by quenching the high-temperature phase

Compared to their predecessors, Alnico and ferrites, rare-earth permanent magnets (REPM) have a magnetic energy product up to a magnitude larger, high remanence and high

From the foregoing illustrations we see that magnetic lines of force flowing in opposite directions between current carrying conductors or between magnets (between

included a rotating shaft, a double arc shaped rotating arms type support frame, and two thin ring permanent magnets.. Magnet material N45H (sintered Nd–Fe–B) was used for the

As shown in Figure 3.2, seven pairs of permanent magnets are put above and below the gap between the copper bars to provide magnetic field needed to accelerate the projectile..

It were shown that the permanent magnets with configuration of halbach arrangement, pole length equals 55% of the slot pitch length, and was skewed with skewing angle of